![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2008 Saini et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. Re-annotation of the physical map of Glycine max for polyploid-like regions by BAC end sequence driven whole genome shotgun read assembly 1Dept. of Plant, Soil and Agricultural Systems: Genomics and Biotechnology Core Facility: Center for Excellence; the Illinois Soybean Center: Southern Illinois University, Carbondale IL, 62901, USA 2School of Biological Sciences, Louisiana Tech University, 120 Carson Taylor Hall, Ruston, LA 71272, USA 3Biotechnology Centre, Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Jabalpur, India Corresponding author.Navinder Saini: navin12/at/gmail.com; Jeffry Shultz: jshultz/at/latech.edu; David A Lightfoot: ga4082/at/siu.edu Received November 25, 2007; Accepted July 7, 2008. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Background Many of the world's most important food crops have either polyploid genomes or homeologous regions derived from segmental shuffling following polyploid formation. The soybean (Glycine max) genome has been shown to be composed of approximately four thousand short interspersed homeologous regions with 1, 2 or 4 copies per haploid genome by RFLP analysis, microsatellite anchors to BACs and by contigs formed from BAC fingerprints. Despite these similar regions,, the genome has been sequenced by whole genome shotgun sequence (WGS). Here the aim was to use BAC end sequences (BES) derived from three minimum tile paths (MTP) to examine the extent and homogeneity of polyploid-like regions within contigs and the extent of correlation between the polyploid-like regions inferred from fingerprinting and the polyploid-like sequences inferred from WGS matches. Results Results show that when sequence divergence was 1–10%, the copy number of homeologous regions could be identified from sequence variation in WGS reads overlapping BES. Homeolog sequence variants (HSVs) were single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs; 89%) and single nucleotide indels (SNIs 10%). Larger indels were rare but present (1%). Simulations that had predicted fingerprints of homeologous regions could be separated when divergence exceeded 2% were shown to be false. We show that a 5–10% sequence divergence is necessary to separate homeologs by fingerprinting. BES compared to WGS traces showed polyploid-like regions with less than 1% sequence divergence exist at 2.3% of the locations assayed. Conclusion The use of HSVs like SNPs and SNIs to characterize BACs wil improve contig building methods. The implications for bioinformatic and functional annotation of polyploid and paleopolyploid genomes show that a combined approach of BAC fingerprint based physical maps, WGS sequence and HSV-based partitioning of BAC clones from homeologous regions to separate contigs will allow reliable de-convolution and positioning of sequence scaffolds (see BES_scaffolds section of SoyGD). This approach will assist genome annotation for paleopolyploid and true polyploid genomes such as soybean and many important cereal and fruit crops. Background Soybean (Glycine max) is the second most valuable crop in the U.S., accounting for $12–17 billion in annual revenue (USDA-NASS Agricultural Statistics 2000–2007). Genomics has had a profound effect on plant biology, but the impact on major crop species such as soybean remains limited to a few marker characterized disease resistant germplasm releases [1,2]. A primary difficulty is that the soybean genome is 4–10 times larger than the model plants Arabidopsis thaliana, Medicago truncatulata or Lotus japonicus. Further, the soybean genome shows evidence of a paleopolyploid origin with gene-rich islands that were highly conserved following duplication [3,4]. Shultz et al., [4] used BAC fingerprint derived contig clone density to estimate that 25–30% of the genome was highly conserved after both duplications, leading to 50–60% of the genome existing in a two- or four-copy state. That conclusion was supported by the gene number in gene families inferred from EST hybridizations to BAC minimum tile paths (MTPs) [5]. Ultimately, Shultz et al., [4] predicted the genome could be resolved into about four thousand segments (each about 150–350 Kbp in size) that differed in copy number per haploid genome. The regions appear interspersed at random, with no evidence for conserved neighbor relationships. Toward the end of developing a complete map describing where duplicated regions were located, contigs representing each of the genomic segments were rebuilt at high stringency and a minimum number of merges allowed [4]. Despite the high stringency, homeologous regions coalesced to single contigs. Consequently, each contig was measured for the number of BAC clones per unique DNA band. Six clones per unique band in a clone fingerprint was expected, yet regions of 12 and 24 clones per unique band were common. Since homeology could not be distinguished from over-representation of regions in the BAC libraries, contigs were labeled to distinguish their expected copy number. The 2,408 contigs in the 1 to 3,500 series were expected to be largely single copy (1,092 numbers were removed when contig merges were made). The 240 contigs in the 8,000 to 8,999 series were predicted to be present in two copies and derive from the more recent tetraploidy event. Therefore, with further analyses the 8,000 series of contigs were each expected to be separated into two, resulting in 480 different regions [6]. The 406 contigs in the 9,000 to 9,999 series were predicted to be largely coalescences of 4 genomic regions derived from both the genome duplication and hybridization events that produced an octaploid-like genome (though an octaploid-like soybean may never have existed since the two events were separated by millions of years). With further analyses, contigs containing clones from 4 genomic regions were expected to separate into 1,624 different regions. In total, 2,104 multi-copy regions and 2,408 single-copy regions were expected. DNA markers that anchored the soybean physical map to the genetic map also showed evidence of variation in copy numbers derived from ancient ploidy shifts [4]. All RFLP markers hybridized to clones in two or more contigs. Even the majority (239/363) of microsatellite markers could generate amplicons from clones in two or more contigs. Markers were labeled with an alphabetic suffix, with -a the smallest amplicons, or band, -b the next smallest (sometimes up to -z in cases where many amplicons were found). Alignment of contigs with the genetic map using these anchors was error prone, requiring each marker anchored contig to be shown at each possible location. To resolve the problem of genetic map placement, microsatellite markers derived from BAC end sequences were used to align contigs with the genetic map [7]. Here, only one outcome was expected, the placement of a single contig to a single location. Maps generated with the markers did show single locations, often in gaps in the existing maps [8]. There were 25,123 BES reads available from the physical map of the 'Forrest' cultivar of soybean that provided about two thousand potential satellite markers. These markers should be enough to locate and orientate every contig at a single map location. These markers, however, cannot separate the polyploid-like regions that are composed of nearly identical homeologous BACs as markers in these regions produce multiple amplicons. New approaches are needed to map these regions correctly. SoyGD, based on a distributed annotation systems (DAS) called the generic model organism databases (e.g. GMOD) [9], was developed to show polyploid genomic regions to users (Figure (Figure1).1
The cultivars Forrest and 'Williams 82' provide a large set of useful genomic tools for soybean genomics [6,12,13]. The two cultivars can be thought models in the same way as are cultivars 'Columbia' and 'Landsberg erecta' to Arabidopsis thaliana, or 'Mo17' and 'B73' are to Zea mays. The soybean community is committed to advancing both resources, with Williams 82 as the lead for a complete genome sequence. In 2007 there were 7.4 million trace sequences at NCBI. Some preliminary sequence contigs with annotations for about 90% of the genome were available. Sequence contigs can be viewed on the genetic map at a new section of SoyGD [4]. These sequence resources represent tools for in silico biology that can resolve the physical map and de-convolute the complete genome sequence. Here, these resources were tested for usefulness as tools to determine if the existing contig annotations truly reflect genomic regions that are polyploidy-like, to identify HSVs that can distinguish homeologs within cultivars and to identify HSVs that can distinguish among soybean cultivars. Results and discussion Genomic regions A MegaBlast of Forrest BES (Table 1) to Williams 82 WGS showed some homeologous regions had diverged significantly and were essentially single-copy (Figure (Figure2).2
Examination of the second BES from B47P08 (ctg 312; LGA1; Figure Figure1)1
Contig 9077, also from LG A1 (Figure (Figure1),1
At BES H51D13 (Figure (Figure5),5 Fourteen BAC clones were chosen from contig 9077 and used for PCR amplification of the BES. Sequencing these amplicons revealed two sequences, each representing one of two homeologs mixed together throughout the contig (Figure (Figure4;4 Of further note, micro-satellite marker Sat_368 anchoring contig 9077 was on the G-type clone ISO56K20. Sat_368 did not appear to have any close homeologs (Additional File 1). Therefore, the octaploid-like regions can be quite heterogeneous across contig-sized regions and suggests diploidization acts on regions less than the size of a BAC clone. A similar pattern was observed on LG G (Figure (Figure6).6
Even the satellite marker Satt688, anchoring BAC H77P02 to contig 9354 and the genetic map showed evidence for conserved homeologs (Figure (Figure8).8
Whole genome comparisions Because BAC clones were selected from the MTP to generate BES, there are many fewer BES from polyploid-like regions than diploidized regions (Table 2). Nonetheless, there are sufficient numbers to examine the usefulness ploidy annotations found at SoyGD. Allowing for 90% identity, the mean number of homeologs inferred from the BES to WGS matches was 8.4 for octaploid-like contigs; 4.5 for tetraploid-like contigs and 1.5 for diploidized contigs. Those means were in good agreement with those inferred from clones per unique band metric used to label contigs in the physical map as potentially repeated and octaploid-like [4]. At 95% identity there were about half as many matches on average, suggesting divergence following the most recent genome duplication has been less than after the first event. At 98 and 99% identity there was evidence for sequence pairs that share significant identity in the polyploid-like regions but not in the diploidized regions.
Genes and markers BAC end sequences anchored to a robust physical map are important tools for genome analysis. BES have been developed from MTP2BH, MTP4BH and MTPE4 (Table 1). Enquiries to GenBank nr and pat databases identified 12,919 potentially geneic homologs. Analysis of the locations of the inferred genes showed evidence of gene rich islands on each chromosome (Figure (Figure1;1 Eighty one homologs of DNA markers found in genetic maps were detected in the BES, i.e. forty two BES's contained sequence highly homologous (over 80–341 bp from e-30 to e-300) to 80 different genetic markers (20 RFLPs, 61 microsatellites), or about 4% of the markers with sequences in GenBank. About three thousand new microsatellite markers were identified within the whole BES collection. SNPs among the HSVs were found in nearly every BES examined. SNIs among the HSVs were found among 24% of sequences (Figure (Figure2,2 Conclusion The comparison of Forrest and Williams 82 sequences represents a powerful tool for soybean geneticists. There are abundant SNPs and SNIs among the sequences, with many linked to predicted gene sequences (Table 1). The high frequency of single nucleotide changes between genomic regions of soybean cultivars has been reported previously [14,15] and stands in contrast to the very low frequency between ESTs [16]. Clearly, further investment in genomic SNP identification is called for. MTP BES [17] make an excellent starting point, providing markers spaced at regular intervals in the genome. In comparison to SNIs, indels larger than 2 bp are very rare. This bias against indels may explain why RFLPs and AFLPs are rare in soybean [3,14]. Further the scarcity of indels will have contributed to the inability of FPC to separate BACs into different contigs, once their sequence identity exceeded 90% [4,18]. The use of SNPs and SNIs to characterize BACs will improve contig building methodology. For example, plate 13 of MTP4BH was developed from just 6 octaploid-like contigs by picking redundant clones from putatively octaploid-like contigs [4]. This set of 748 sequences should resolve into 48 regions when the genome sequence is properly de-convoluted. Bioinformatic and functional annotation of polyploid genomes can be greatly improved using a combination of BAC fingerprint based physical maps, WGS sequence and HSV partitioning of BAC clones in polyploid regions. The separation of contigs will allow the de-convolution of sequence and allow whole genome annotation in polyploids. Preliminary results from stringent BLAT analysis of BES to sequence scaffolds can be viewed at SoyGD [4] Major challenges will have to be overcome in assigning function to the duplicated regions. Reverse genetic approaches like gene silencing and mutation would be expected to be effective only in certain small gene families and particular genomic regions. Gene silencing should work when duplicated genes of redundant function are close enough in sequence to be inhibited by the same probe [19]. During over-expression [20], the co-suppression response of the endogenous gene family will have to be considered. Will co-suppression actually reduce the activity of the members of the gene family in patterns not predicted by the experimenters? In the case of the identification of mutations for loss of function by TILLING [21-23], the functions of the homeologous genes must have been sufficiently diverged over evolutionary time for success to be expected. Secondly, no aneupleurotic pathways with functional redundancy must exist. The physical map should be used to guide these approaches. A complete map of homeologous regions can help identify genes in regions likely to be unique, single copy, and others likely to be redundant in 2 or 4 copies like an allo-polyploid. Methods Source of sequences Forrest genome resources used included all three MTPs described in Table 1. There were 13,473 BES reads from MTP2 (CG826126 to CG812653). There were 7,700 BES reads from MTP4BH (DX406713 to DX414412) and 3,324 reads from MTP4E (ER962965 to ER966289). After trimming, the mean read length for these BES was about 736 bp. The total sequence generated was 18.5 Mbp, or about 2% of the soybean genome. There were 9,386 paired, forward and reverse reads. At the time of enquiry (mid 2007), there were 7.4 million reads of Williams 82 genome reported in the trace sequence section of NCBI [29]. The total amount of sequence was 6,000 Mbp, about six fold the soybean genome. Most were paired forward and reverse reads from 2–3 kb inserts. These sequences were not trimmed and most contained 50–60 bp of sequence from pUC18 at the start of the sequence. About 36,000 reads had another tract from pUC18 at the end of the sequence. In silico polymorphism detections MegaBlast enquiries were made of the Glycine max WGS database using individual BES [29]. Criteria set were; database Glycine max-WGS; hits computed 250; all low complexity filter selected; expect was set to 10; word size was set to 32 or 64; percent identity used was normally 90% though 99%, 98%, 95%, and 85% were manually tested in instances noted in the results. Results were assembled into groups of 100 by expected copy number and 600 were examined by a manual editor. Distance trees of the results were selected (some some typical result trees were captured as screen shots (Figures (Figures2,2 In vitro HSV polymorphism detection BACs from homeologous regions that assembled into single contigs were picked from BAC library master plates. DNA was extracted as previously described [4,17]. Primers were designed from within the BES to encompass HSV. Settings used for primer design were Tm 55° ± 1°C, amplicons 100–500 bp, primer length 20 ± 2 bp. No constraints on GC% were set to avoid potential bias against the AT rich regions of the soybean genome. Repeated DNA amplicons (mini-satellites, transposons etc.) were filtered out by Blast searching, unlike Shultz et al., [7]. Primers were obtained from Sigma Genosys (Woodlands, TX). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed in a PE 9700 (Boston, MA). An initial 95°C denaturation for 5 min was followed by 30 cycles of 95° for 30 s, 55° for 30 s, and 72° for 30 s. After PCR was complete, gel electrophoresis was performed in a 2% (w/v) agarose gel or a 4% (w/v) PAGE stained with ethidium bromide and amplicon documented using a BioRad GelDoc (Hercules, CA) system. Bands were isolated in pGEM3T. SNP polymorphism was identified by DNA sequencing of PCR amplicons following plasmid isolation using a CEQ2000 (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA). Annotation and map representation All potential SNPs, SNIs and microsatellites that distinguish either cultivars or homeologs were named with the SIUC_ suffix (at each database entry and first mention in the text) followed by N-, I- or S- prefix. For cultivar polymorphisms this was followed by the motif and BAC of origin. For HSVs the letter H- was suffixed, then followed by the motif and BAC of origin. In contrast, earlier markers were assigned a sequential number [30-33]. The altered naming convention used here was designed to help users find the clone of origin in the physical map. All potential markers will be shown at SoyGD in the BES_SSR, BES_SNP or BES_SNI track (not shown). Markers that have been located in the genetic map by DNA polymorphism scored in RIL populations will be shown on the locus track. Abbreviations BAC: bacterial artificial chromosome; BES: BAC end sequence; bp: base pair; contig: contiguous set of overlapping clones; EST: expressed sequence tag; HSV: homeolog sequence variant; LIS: legume information system; MTP: minimum tiling path; NCBI: National Center for Biotechnology Information; RFLP: restriction fragment length polymorphism; SNH: single nucleotide polymorphism between homeologs; SNI: single nucleotide insertion; SNP: single nucleotide polymorphism between alleles; SSR: simple sequence repeat. Authors' contributions DAL and NS conceived of the study and executed all of the analysis. JS classified the contigs for ploidy based on clones per unique band. DAL drafted the manuscript. NS and JS provided critical review, interpretation of results and funding. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Additional File 1 The WGS trace files homeologous to marker sequence Sat_368. No evidence for multiple homeologs was found. Click here for file(32K, doc) Acknowledgements The physical map was based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 9872635. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. The continued support of SIUC, College of Agriculture and Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research to DAL and the LTU College of Applied and Natural Sciences to JS is appreciated. The authors thank Dr. Q. Tao and Dr, H.B. Zhang for assistance with fingerprinting. We thank Dr. C. Town and Dr. C. Foo at TIGR for the BES and BLAT. We thank the "Soybean Genome Project, at DoE Joint Genome Institute" for release of the WGS reads and scaffolds. We thank the Government of India for support of the Fellowship for NS. References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Genetics. 1996 Sep; 144(1):329-38.
[Genetics. 1996]Nucleic Acids Res. 2006 Jan 1; 34(Database issue):D758-65.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 2006]Nucleic Acids Res. 2006 Jan 1; 34(Database issue):D758-65.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 2006]Plant Methods. 2006 Dec 8; 2():20.
[Plant Methods. 2006]Nucleic Acids Res. 2006 Jan 1; 34(Database issue):D758-65.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 2006]Nucleic Acids Res. 2006 Jan 1; 34(Database issue):D758-65.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 2006]Theor Appl Genet. 2007 Apr; 114(6):1081-90.
[Theor Appl Genet. 2007]Genome Res. 2002 Oct; 12(10):1599-610.
[Genome Res. 2002]Genome Biol. 2003; 4(8):R47.
[Genome Biol. 2003]Nucleic Acids Res. 2006 Jan 1; 34(Database issue):D758-65.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 2006]Bioinformatics. 2005 Sep 1; 21(17):3461-8.
[Bioinformatics. 2005]Nucleic Acids Res. 2006 Jan 1; 34(Database issue):D758-65.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 2006]Nucleic Acids Res. 2006 Jan 1; 34(Database issue):D758-65.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 2006]Nucleic Acids Res. 2006 Jan 1; 34(Database issue):D758-65.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 2006]Nucleic Acids Res. 2006 Jan 1; 34(Database issue):D758-65.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 2006]Genetics. 2003 Mar; 163(3):1123-34.
[Genetics. 2003]Plant Methods. 2006 May 25; 2():9.
[Plant Methods. 2006]Genetics. 1996 Sep; 144(1):329-38.
[Genetics. 1996]Nucleic Acids Res. 2006 Jan 1; 34(Database issue):D758-65.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 2006]Genome Res. 2004 Feb; 14(2):319-26.
[Genome Res. 2004]Nucleic Acids Res. 2006 Jan 1; 34(Database issue):D758-65.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 2006]Plant J. 2001 Sep; 27(6):581-90.
[Plant J. 2001]Plant J. 2005 Aug; 43(3):449-57.
[Plant J. 2005]Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2001 Apr; 4(2):111-7.
[Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2001]Nucleic Acids Res. 2006 Jan 1; 34(Database issue):D758-65.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 2006]Plant Methods. 2006 May 25; 2():9.
[Plant Methods. 2006]Theor Appl Genet. 2007 Apr; 114(6):1081-90.
[Theor Appl Genet. 2007]