Logo of bmcbioiBioMed Centralsearchsubmit a manuscriptregisterthis articleBMC Bioinformatics
BMC Bioinformatics. 2008; 9: 281.
Published online 2008 Jun 14. doi:  10.1186/1471-2105-9-281
PMCID: PMC2474620

PURE: A webserver for the prediction of domains in unassigned regions in proteins



Protein domains are the structural and functional units of proteins. The ability to parse proteins into different domains is important for effective classification, understanding of protein structure, function, and evolution and is hence biologically relevant. Several computational methods are available to identify domains in the sequence. Domain finding algorithms often employ stringent thresholds to recognize sequence domains. Identification of additional domains can be tedious involving intense computation and manual intervention but can lead to better understanding of overall biological function. In this context, the problem of identifying new domains in the unassigned regions of a protein sequence assumes a crucial importance.


We had earlier demonstrated that accumulation of domain information of sequence homologues can substantially aid prediction of new domains. In this paper, we propose a computationally intensive, multi-step bioinformatics protocol as a web server named as PURE (Prediction of Unassigned REgions in proteins) for the detailed examination of stretches of unassigned regions in proteins. Query sequence is processed using different automated filtering steps based on length, presence of coiled-coil regions, transmembrane regions, homologous sequences and percentage of secondary structure content. Later, the filtered sequence segments and their sequence homologues are fed to PSI-BLAST, cd-hit and Hmmpfam. Data from the various programs are integrated and information regarding the probable domains predicted from the sequence is reported.


We have implemented PURE protocol as a web server for rapid and comprehensive analysis of unassigned regions in the proteins. This server integrates data from different programs and provides information about the domains encoded in the unassigned regions.


Protein domains are the structural and functional units of proteins and represent one of the most useful levels to understand protein function. Analysis of proteins at the level of domain families has had a profound impact on the study of individual proteins. Protein domain discovery using various computational approaches has been progressing steadily over the past 35 years [1]. They can be defined using multiple criteria, or combinations of criteria, including evolutionary conservation, discrete functionality, and the ability to fold independently [2]. The identification of protein domains within a polypeptide chain can be achieved in several ways. Methods applied by classification databases such as the Dali domain dictionary [3], CATH [4], SCOP [5], DIAL [6] employ structural data to locate and assign domains. Identification of domains at the sequence level most often relies on the detection of global and local sequence alignments between a given target sequence and domain sequences found in databases such as Pfam [7]. However, difficulties in elucidating the domain content of a given sequence arise when searching the target sequence against sequence databases resulting in a lack of significant matches. For example, Mycoplasma genitalium is a small genome with 483 proteins but only 386 protein sequences have known Pfam hits with 56% residue coverage. In such situations, there is a need to further explore other methods for domain assignment from sequence. Though, similar approaches of integrating multiple, sensitive database searches to detect distant homologues has been reported as a successful method to establish remote homology [8], we have recently shown that it is possible to enhance prediction of domains by 25% through indirect connections, namely consulting the domain architecture of sequence homologues [9]. In this paper, we report the availability of a bioinformatics protocol, as a web server called PURE (Prediction of unassigned regions in proteins), which will enhance the domain predictions. PURE protocol utilizes the concept of intermediate sequence search (ISS) [10] to assign functional domain to a given unassigned region with the help of connecting sequences. Indirect connections between the query and distantly related domain is established through a powerful procedure using PSI-BLAST hits which are individually routed through a rigorous Hmmpfam search against Pfam database [11].


PURE server: description and features

PURE server processes the query sequence in FASTA format using a computationally intensive bioinformatics protocol. A detailed flow-chart of the protocol is provided in Figure Figure1.1. The web interface is developed in HTML and Java script. The wrapper scripts for external programs like Globplot [12], Disopred2 [13] Pepcoils [14], Tmap [14], psipred [15], Scanprosite [16], PSI-BLAST [17], cd-hit [18] and Hmmpfam [19], while core programs that integrate results, CGI programs and automated e-mail programs are coded in Perl. Multiple alignment visualization of PSI-BLAST output is enabled using Mview [20]. The graphics that integrate the results are generated using Bio::graphics module from Bioperl [21].

Figure 1
PURE protocol flowchart.

Input options

PURE server is designed to accept a single sequence in FASTA format at a time (Figure (Figure2).2). Users can submit the sequence as a file using the upload option or copy paste option. Users should also submit a valid, non-commercial email address to the server. PURE server will send the result URL to the email address. Options are provided to select E-value for the PSI-BLAST search and Hmmpfam [16] search against various sequence databases like NCBI-NR [22] and SwissProt [23]. Options are also provided to change the clustered sequence space obtained from PSI-BLAST search using different threshold value for cd-hit. User can also choose the filtering option.

Figure 2
Screenshot of input options from PURE server.

Output details

PURE Server examines unassigned regions for the presence of disordered regions, coiled coils, transmembrane helices, appropriate extent of predicted secondary structural content and presence of homologous sequences before the assignment of probable structural domains. These are also provided as links to the URL where the output is stored in. Output can be mainly divided into two:

A. Consensus output: provides a summary of the overall results (Figure (Figure3).3). Consensus result page provides a complete overview of the PURE results for the query sequence. The First table in the Consensus result provides the details about the domain assigned, if any, using PURE protocols. This table provides the name of the domain associated to the unassigned region, domain frequency and the direct link to the Pfam database [7] of the identified domain. The table is followed by a graphical representation of PURE Results indicating domain boundaries and the region of similarity between the unassigned region and the associated Pfam domains. This figure is dynamically generated after processing complete results from PURE run for the query sequence. Further, the Bio::graphics [19] based picture provides a complete overview of the query sequence (query), transmembrane regions (Tmap), coiled coil regions (Pepcoil), extracted sequence segments (sequence_segments) after removal of transmembrane and coiled coil regions from the query sequence and the domains assigned by PURE. Apart from the above mentioned information, consensus results page also provides a link to the detailed results page of the PURE results.

Figure 3
Screenshot of concise output from PURE server.

B. Detailed output: This output is divided into 10 sections for a successful PURE run. Each of the files provided in detailed output gives the background details about the final result file (Figure (Figure44).

Figure 4
Screenshot of detailed results from PURE server.

1. Disorder prediction: This section shows the predicted disordered regions in the query sequence. We have employed Globplot [12] and Disopred2 [13] programs for the prediction of disordered regions in the protein sequence.

2. Pepcoils results: This file is generated for the prediction of coiled coils by Pepcoils (EMBOSS) [14] program that works around COILS [24] algorithm. Details about the coiled coils identified from the query sequence are available in this file. Another file with the query sequence parsed for coiled coil regions (such regions are substituted with '=') is also provided.

3. Tmap results: This file is generated to record probable transmembrane helices in the query sequence as identified by Tmap (EMBOSS) [14] program. Another file with transmembrane regions identified from query sequence substituted with 'x' is also provided for better understanding of the presence of transmembrane regions.

4. Integrated filter results: Both COILS and Tmap files are processed using a Perl program. This program integrates the query sequence to provide a modified query sequence file, with coiled coils and transmembrane regions substituted with '=' and 'x' respectively. By default, such regions are not considered for further analysis. Further, the sequence is split into segments based on the presence of transmembrane regions and coiled coil regions. Only sequence segments having ≥ 30 residues are considered for further analysis, in order to avoid spurious hits in subsequent PSI-BLAST jobs.

5. Examine the sequence segments extracted from query sequence after filtering using Pepcoils and Tmap. Sequence is split into different fragments based on the presence of coiled coil and transmembrane regions, each fragment should have at least 30 residues to be considered for further analysis.

6. Psipred results: We have used psipred [15] program for secondary structure prediction, sequence segments with ≥ 15% secondary structural content considered for further analysis.

7. PSI-BLAST result file: Sequence segments which passed the filtering criteria above are fed to PSI-BLAST [17] for similarity search. Mview based visualization of PSI-BLAST results are also provided for better insight into the PSI-BLAST results.

8. Scanprosite results: Prosite [16] scan results are supplied as a supplement to our method. Scanprosite scans query sequence for the occurrence of patterns, profiles and rules (motifs) stored in the Prosite database [25].

9. Hmmpfam Results: The results obtained by running Hmmpfam on homologous sequences and the assignment of Pfam domains for homologues are provided here. Only representative sequences, as recognized after clustering by cd-hit [18] are considered for the search for domains.

10. Domains assigned using PURE: This is the major output file that integrates the PSI-BLAST and Hmmpfam search output and provide the probable domains identified using PURE protocol for the unassigned regions in the query. Bio::graphics [21] based image is provided for the better overview of the detailed result.

11. Concluding remarks: The concluding mark is derived at the end of each run after analyzing all the files that are generated. Various output possibilities and concluding remarks are discussed in Table Table11.

Table 1
Concluding remarks from PURE server based on various outputs

Results and Discussion

In cases where the PURE server is not effective with default parameters, the user can manoeuvre the search directions by changing certain parameters. However, the minimum length of 30 residues for an unassigned region (UR) is not recommended to go lower, in order to avoid sub-optimal alignments and false positives. By default, unassigned region will be split whenever transmembrane helices (TM) or coiled coils regions are encountered; however, there is a possibility to override this option. Likewise, the E-value thresholds of PSI-BLAST runs and cd-hit thresholds for representative homologous sequences can be modified according to the choice of the user. It is also possible to increase the number of homologues identified and simultaneously decrease the cd-hit clustering threshold so that fewer representatives are examined for the domain architecture. This strategy is recommended to improve the sampling of sequence space.

We have tested the reliability of the PURE algorithm as well as the performance of the server using various datasets. PURE protocol was successfully employed to annotate 67 adenylyl cyclase proteins with unassigned regions [24] and in Mycoplasma gallisepticum genome analysis where 82 new domains are added to 72 proteins out of which 48 proteins are earlier completely unassigned (unpublished data).


Due to advancement in high-throughput techniques, sequence data are generating at a rapid pace, but the biochemical validation of available sequences is still a challenge. Efficient computational methods can be employed to overcome the lacunae in high-throughput sequence data generation and function annotation. PURE can be used as an efficient and computationally intensive protocol to successfully annotate unassigned regions in sequences.

Availability and requirements

Project name: PURE – Prediction of domains in the protein unassigned regions

Project home page: [26]

A sample consensus page, with above explained features, is available: [27]

Pre-computed results for selected unassigned regions from earlier analysis [9] are available: [28]

Operating system(s): Platform independent (web server)

Programming language: HTML, Perl, CGI, Java script

License: Free for academics, Authorization license needed for commercial usage (Please contact the corresponding author for more details)

Any restrictions to use by non-academics: license needed

Authors' contributions

RS and BOO conceived and helped in the implementation of the webserver idea. CCSR and KS have developed the scripts and tools for the webserver. CCSR and KS wrote the manuscript; RS and BOO provided critical inputs to improve the manuscript.


RS was a senior research fellow of the Wellcome trust, U.K. by which KS's stay could be supported. CSR is supported by a PhD scholarship from Conseil Régional de La Réunion. BO is partially funded by PRES Ocean Indien from Université de La Reunion. We would also like to thank NCBS for infrastructural support. The authors would like to thank Prof. N. Srinivasan and Dr. Alexandre de Brevern for helpful suggestions.


  • Copley RR, Doerks T, Letunic I, Bork P. FEBS Lett. 2002/03/26. Vol. 513. 2002. Protein domain analysis in the era of complete genomes; pp. 129–134. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Holm L, Sander C. Proteins. 1994/07/01. Vol. 19. 1994. Parser for protein folding units; pp. 256–268. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Dietmann S, Holm L. Nat Struct Biol. 2001/10/31. Vol. 8. 2001. Identification of homology in protein structure classification; pp. 953–957. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Orengo CA, Michie AD, Jones S, Jones DT, Swindells MB, Thornton JM. Structure. 1997/08/15. Vol. 5. 1997. CATH--a hierarchic classification of protein domain structures; pp. 1093–1108. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Murzin AG, Brenner SE, Hubbard T, Chothia C. J Mol Biol. 1995/04/07. Vol. 247. 1995. SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures; pp. 536–540. [PubMed]
  • Sowdhamini R, Blundell TL. Protein Sci. 1995/03/01. Vol. 4. 1995. An automatic method involving cluster analysis of secondary structures for the identification of domains in proteins; pp. 506–520. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Sonnhammer EL, Eddy SR, Birney E, Bateman A, Durbin R. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998/02/21. Vol. 26. 1998. Pfam: multiple sequence alignments and HMM-profiles of protein domains; pp. 320–322. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Salamov AA, Suwa M, Orengo CA, Swindells MB. Protein Eng. 1999/04/09. Vol. 12. 1999. Combining sensitive database searches with multiple intermediates to detect distant homologues; pp. 95–100. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Reddy CS, Manonmani A, Babu M, Sowdhamini R. In Silico Biol. 2007/02/06. Vol. 6. 2006. Enhanced structure prediction of gene products containing class III adenylyl cyclase domains; pp. 351–362. [PubMed]
  • Park J, Teichmann SA, Hubbard T, Chothia C. J Mol Biol. 1997/11/21. Vol. 273. 1997. Intermediate sequences increase the detection of homology between sequences; pp. 349–354. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Bateman A, Coin L, Durbin R, Finn RD, Hollich V, Griffiths-Jones S, Khanna A, Marshall M, Moxon S, Sonnhammer EL, Studholme DJ, Yeats C, Eddy SR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003/12/19. Vol. 32. 2004. The Pfam protein families database; pp. D138–41. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Linding R, Russell RB, Neduva V, Gibson TJ. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003/06/26. Vol. 31. 2003. GlobPlot: Exploring protein sequences for globularity and disorder; pp. 3701–3708. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Ward JJ, Sodhi JS, McGuffin LJ, Buxton BF, Jones DT. J Mol Biol. 2004/03/17. Vol. 337. 2004. Prediction and functional analysis of native disorder in proteins from the three kingdoms of life; pp. 635–645. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Rice P, Longden I, Bleasby A. Trends Genet. 2000/05/29. Vol. 16. 2000. EMBOSS: the European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite; pp. 276–277. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • McGuffin LJ, Bryson K, Jones DT. Bioinformatics. 2000/06/27. Vol. 16. 2000. The PSIPRED protein structure prediction server; pp. 404–405. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • de Castro E, Sigrist CJ, Gattiker A, Bulliard V, Langendijk-Genevaux PS, Gasteiger E, Bairoch A, Hulo N. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006/07/18. Vol. 34. 2006. ScanProsite: detection of PROSITE signature matches and ProRule-associated functional and structural residues in proteins; pp. W362–5. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997/09/01. Vol. 25. 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs; pp. 3389–3402. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Li W, Godzik A. Bioinformatics. 2006/05/30. Vol. 22. 2006. Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences; pp. 1658–1659. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Eddy SR. Bioinformatics. 1999/01/27. Vol. 14. 1998. Profile hidden Markov models; pp. 755–763. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Brown NP, Leroy C, Sander C. Bioinformatics. 1998/06/20. Vol. 14. 1998. MView: a web-compatible database search or multiple alignment viewer; pp. 380–381. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Stajich JE, Block D, Boulez K, Brenner SE, Chervitz SA, Dagdigian C, Fuellen G, Gilbert JG, Korf I, Lapp H, Lehvaslaiho H, Matsalla C, Mungall CJ, Osborne BI, Pocock MR, Schattner P, Senger M, Stein LD, Stupka E, Wilkinson MD, Birney E. Genome Res. 2002/10/09. Vol. 12. 2002. The Bioperl toolkit: Perl modules for the life sciences; pp. 1611–1618. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Wheeler DL, Barrett T, Benson DA, Bryant SH, Canese K, Chetvernin V, Church DM, DiCuccio M, Edgar R, Federhen S, Geer LY, Kapustin Y, Khovayko O, Landsman D, Lipman DJ, Madden TL, Maglott DR, Ostell J, Miller V, Pruitt KD, Schuler GD, Sequeira E, Sherry ST, Sirotkin K, Souvorov A, Starchenko G, Tatusov RL, Tatusova TA, Wagner L, Yaschenko E. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006/12/16. Vol. 35. 2007. Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information; pp. D5–12. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Bairoch A, Apweiler R. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999/12/11. Vol. 28. 2000. The SWISS-PROT protein sequence database and its supplement TrEMBL in 2000; pp. 45–48. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Lupas A, Van Dyke M, Stock J. Science. 1991/05/24. Vol. 252. 1991. Predicting coiled coils from protein sequences; pp. 1162–1164. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Hulo N, Bairoch A, Bulliard V, Cerutti L, De Castro E, Langendijk-Genevaux PS, Pagni M, Sigrist CJ. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005/12/31. Vol. 34. 2006. The PROSITE database; pp. D227–30. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • PURE server home page http://caps.ncbs.res.in/PURE
  • Sample consensus page http://caps.ncbs.res.in/PURE/PURE_Results/PURE_Consensus/TueAug21095436IST2007_consensus.html
  • Pre-computed results http://caps.ncbs.res.in/PURE/example_result.html

Articles from BMC Bioinformatics are provided here courtesy of BioMed Central
PubReader format: click here to try


Save items

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...


  • Compound
    PubChem chemical compound records that cite the current articles. These references are taken from those provided on submitted PubChem chemical substance records. Multiple substance records may contribute to the PubChem compound record.
  • MedGen
    Related information in MedGen
  • PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles
  • Substance
    PubChem chemical substance records that cite the current articles. These references are taken from those provided on submitted PubChem chemical substance records.
  • Taxonomy
    Taxonomy records associated with the current articles through taxonomic information on related molecular database records (Nucleotide, Protein, Gene, SNP, Structure).
  • Taxonomy Tree
    Taxonomy Tree

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...