![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2008 Ochsenreither et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. Relative quantification of TCR Vbeta-chain families by real time PCR for identification of clonal T-cell populations 1University Hospital Benjamin Franklin, Medizinische Klinik III, Hematology, Oncology, and Transfusion Medicine, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 12200, Berlin, Germany 2University of Würzburg, Clinic for Dermatology, Allergology, and Venerology, 97080, Würzburg, Germany Corresponding author.Sebastian Ochsenreither: sebastian.ochsenreither/at/charite.de; Alberto Fusi: albyjo/at/yahoo.it; Antonia Busse: antonia.busse/at/charite.de; Dirk Nagorsen: dirk.nagorsen/at/charite.de; David Schrama: schrama_d/at/klinik.uni-wuerzburg.de; Jürgen Becker: becker_jc/at/klinik.uni-wuerzburg.de; Eckhard Thiel: eckhard.thiel/at/charite.de; Ulrich Keilholz: ulrich.keilholz/at/charite.de Received February 18, 2008; Accepted July 1, 2008. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Background Quantification of T-cell receptor (TCR) chain families can be utilized for detection of clonal T-cell populations. Besides southern blotting and antibody-based approaches, quantitative real time PCR (qRT PCR) has been more widely applied in this context during the last years. Here, the heterogeneity of sequences within single families is the most challenging problem for exact quantification. Method Vβ-families were quantified using a universal reverse primer and family-specific forward primers with TaqMan technology on a light cycler instrument. Relative concentrations were calculated considering slopes and crossing points of each PCR reaction. Total expression of α/β TCR was assessed by quantification of the constant α-chain as a further control. Results The method was tested by serial dilutions of clonal T-cells in mononuclear cells from healthy volunteers. Calculated percentages were in good correspondence with qRT PCR results demonstrating high reliability. Duplicates showed excellent technical reproducibility. We analyzed blood samples of 20 healthy volunteers for determination of mean and standard deviation for each family. The method was applied both to tissue and blood samples from patients with carcinomas and hematological disorders. Conclusion We introduce a versatile method for the relative quantification of Vβ-families by real time PCR. The experimental strategy described allows the identification of alterations in the Vβ-family repertoire. Background T-lymphocytes are specialized mediators of the adaptive immune system, selectively destroying cells altered by viral infection or malignant transformation [1,2]. T-cell mediated immune responses are characterized by activation and subsequent clonal expansion of antigen-specific cells. Recognition of Major Histocompatibility Complex class I (MHC-I) bound peptide is mediated by the dimeric transmembrane T-cell receptor (TCR) composed of an α- and a β-chain in the majority of cases. The high diversity of these chains is generated by stepwise recombinations of a multitude of variable (V), in case of the β-chain diversity (D), and joining (J) gene sequences with a corresponding constant (C) chain during thymic T-cell evolution [3]. V-genes are grouped in families consisting of genes with at least 50% sequence homology [4]. T lymphocyte repertoire alterations can be evaluated by TCR-diversity restriction analyses of the sequence or the length of the high variable part of the α- or β-chains (e. g. spectrotype, SSCP ('single strand conformation polymorphism'), DGGE ('denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis'), heteroduplex analysis [5-11]) or by TCR V-family quantification [12-16]. Because of the lower described number of Vβ-families compared to Vα-families, the higher variability of the β-chain, and the fact that each T-cell clone can express two different α-chains but only one β-chain, the Vβ-chain has been largely preferred for this type of analysis [12,13,17,18]. Quantification of Vβ-families have been investigated by means of different approaches as southern blotting or, more recently, Fluorescence Activated Cell Sorter (FACS) and quantitative real time reverse transcribed PCR (qRT PCR) [5,12-14]. In contrast to other approaches, PCR-based methods could detect a higher number of different families, had higher selectivity, and were applicable to different specimens. A cumbersome limitation for qRT PCR assessments was the suboptimal establishment of standard dilution curves for exact quantification due to the high heterogeneity of sequences within each family. Here we introduce a versatile and rapid method for qRT PCR relative quantification of Vβ-family expressions based on slope and crossing point of the respective PCR reaction overwhelming therefore the problem of establishing standard dilution curves. Methods Specimen collection Peripheral blood samples were drawn form patients and healthy volunteers. Tissue samples were collected from patients with colorectal cancer who underwent therapeutical resection. Both patients and controls had given informed consent for the use of their specimens before sampling. Human T acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) cell lines JURKAT, MOLT-16, and CCRF-CEM were purchased from German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures (DSMZ) and cultivated under recommended conditions. RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis Total RNA was extracted from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) or fresh tissue using TRIzol® (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California, USA) or RNeasy® Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany) according to manufacturers' instructions. RNA was quantified using a NanoDrop® ND-1000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Wilmington, Delaware, USA), and integrity was checked electrophoretically. Reverse transcription was performed with Omniscript Reverse Transcriptase® (Qiagen) as described previously [19]. Samples were stored at -20°C. Relative quantification of Vβ-families For estimation of the relative expression of a single TCR Vβ-chain, qRT PCRs were performed with a universal reverse primer HBC-rev, a TaqMan probe HBCTP-FAM, both annealing at the constant part of the β-chain (Cβ), and Vβ-family-specific forward primers (modified from [10], Table 1, Figure Figure1A).1A
For the calculation of the percentage P of each Vβ-family j, it was assumed that the effective concentration c of each marker was where Cp was the Crossing point, assuming a constant s for all families. Quantification of TCR constant α-chain For determination of total TCR expression, the TCR constant α-chain (HAC) was quantified on a LightCycler® (Roche) as well as the low-abundance housekeeping gene porphobilinogen deaminidase (PBGD) for normalization as described [19]. PCR reactions were optimized using a mixture of cDNA as template. For quantification, LightCycler® FastStart DNA Master HybProbe (Roche) was used. Primer sequences, final MgCl2 concentration, and annealing temperatures TA were listed in Table 2. After optimization of PCR conditions, fragments were amplified conventionally, cloned into a pCR2.1-TOPO vector, and transformed into TOPO10' competent E. coli using TOPO TA Cloning® Kit (Invitrogen). After subcloning in liquid ImMedia® (Invitrogen) and plasmid preparation with QiaMiniprep® Kit (Qiagen), clones were linearized by digesting with EcoR I (Fermentas, St. Leon-Rot, Baden-Württemberg, Germany). Clones were sequenced, quantified spectrophotometrically and serially diluted as concentration standards. Sample concentrations were extrapolated plotting sample-crossing point Cp against the regression line through standard-Cp. RNA quantity was expressed as ratio plasmid equivalent HAC to PBGD.
Results and Discussion Slopes of the PCR reactions for all Vβ-families were determined by dilution series of a positive control as described (data not shown). The average slope was 3.966 with a standard deviation of 0.61. This value was used for the calculation of family percentages. For assessment of mean value and standard deviation of each family in peripheral blood, PBMCs of 20 healthy volunteers were analyzed (Figure (Figure1B1B For assessment of reliability and reproducibility, samples containing 105 PBMCs of three healthy controls were prepared and different amounts of JURKAT-cells were added. JURKAT is a TCR α/β-expressing T-ALL cell line. Using serial dilution, aliquots of 50, 500, 5000, and 50,000 JURKAT cells were produced and subsequently added to PBMCs. Sample preparation, RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis, and qRT PCR were performed in duplicates for all concentrations for each volunteer. Results were expressed as averages of the calculated percentages of the sample duplicates. The mean difference in the percentage of each Vβ-family in all dilution duplicates was 1.01% indicating excellent technical reproducibility. For all three healthy control PBMCs spiked with JURKAT cells, a clear increase in percentage value of Vβ-family 8 was observed comparing 5000 to 500 cells per 105 PBMC (Figure (Figure2A).2A
Because total amount of TCR α/β expression could be different among various types of specimens, we quantified the constant α-chain as a control of sample quality. HAC expression was 50-fold higher in PBMCs than in tissue samples (data not shown). In this study, we introduced a new approach for estimating the distribution of Vβ-family expression in a population of T-cells. To determine the effective concentration of a transcript, standard dilutions of the specific fragment are generally utilized. In case of Vβ-family analysis, not a single target but a big amount of different close related transcripts has to be quantified because of the high variability of the Complement Determining Region 3 (CDR3) both in length and sequence. Therefore, establishment of a PCR in which a dilution series of a single amplicon (standard curve) is used for normalization, besides increase in costs, can not lead to exact results even using probes annealing to the constant part of the Vβ-chain. As PCR reactions lead to an exponential increase of produced fragments, and as a result crossing point values have to be interpreted logarithmically concerning the effective concentration of the target, it is possible to calculate percentages without normalization and independently from the sample concentration when crossing points and slope are taken into consideration. For these reasons, in order to by-pass CDR3 diversity, we established a system in which relative quantification is based on the comparison of crossing points, rather than performing a family-by-family quantification using single sequence plasmids for normalization. There are two drawbacks on the approach: First, because the system is ,normalized' by the sum of its c'-values, results from runs with more than three lacking crossing points (because of suboptimal sample quality or technical problems) will not be informative. Second, the high standard deviation of the slopes limits the correctness of the mathematical procedure. Exemplary calculations showed that this effect was of no practical relevance as long as the concentration difference between compared samples, reflected by the difference between the sums of all c' (c'total), did not exceed a factor of 100 (data not shown). Nevertheless, this effect may play a role comparing blood with tissue as HAC/PBGD ratio in tissue is lower than in PBMCs. If the difference would be much higher, mathematical corrections of the percentage of a single predominant family should be performed considering Δc'total and sj. The method was applied to blood samples of patients with hematological diseases and to colon carcinoma tissues. Three examples with representative Vβ patterns were shown in Figure Figure4.4
Compared to techniques characterizing the CDR3 region (e.g. spectrotyping, SSCP, DGGE), the method described is less time-consuming and useful for high-throughput screening analyses. As for spectrotyping, conclusive proof of clonality can only be achieved by sequencing. Approaches like TC landscape combine CDR3 length analysis with Vβ-family quantification by FACS quantification in order to improve sensitivity [5]. Due to higher number of detectable families and higher sensitivity, the use of a high-throughput PCR-based quantification algorithm could make a combined approach even more effective [16]. Conclusion We present a novel and versatile approach for high-throughput Vβ family quantification. Our approach is suitable for samples from blood or bone marrow as well as from tissue. Because of high reproducibility, comparative analyses of samples in different time points or from different compartments are possible. Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Authors' contributions SO and AF carried out most of the molecular applications. SO developed the mathematical algorithm and did the calculations and the data analysis. AB did the qRT PCR quantification of HAC and PBGD. DN was responsible for collection and storage of blood and tissue samples. DS and JB built up qRT PCRs for family quantification which were used as basis for the LightCycler approach. ET and UK coordinated the laboratory work and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Acknowledgements We thank Susanne Wojtke for excellent technical assistance. References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||
J Invest Dermatol. 2006 Jan; 126(1):32-41.
[J Invest Dermatol. 2006]Annu Rev Immunol. 2006; 24():175-208.
[Annu Rev Immunol. 2006]Nature. 1988 Aug 4; 334(6181):395-402.
[Nature. 1988]Immunogenetics. 1995; 42(6):455-500.
[Immunogenetics. 1995]Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2002 Mar; 9(2):257-66.
[Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2002]Leukemia. 2003 Dec; 17(12):2257-317.
[Leukemia. 2003]Clin Cancer Res. 1996 Apr; 2(4):767-72.
[Clin Cancer Res. 1996]Int J Cancer. 2004 Jul 10; 110(5):721-9.
[Int J Cancer. 2004]J Immunol Methods. 2005 Jul; 302(1-2):54-67.
[J Immunol Methods. 2005]Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2002 Mar; 9(2):257-66.
[Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2002]Clin Cancer Res. 1996 Apr; 2(4):767-72.
[Clin Cancer Res. 1996]J Immunol Methods. 2002 Mar 1; 261(1-2):177-94.
[J Immunol Methods. 2002]Clin Cancer Res. 2004 Mar 1; 10(5):1605-12.
[Clin Cancer Res. 2004]Biotechniques. 1998 Aug; 25(2):244-50.
[Biotechniques. 1998]Immunogenetics. 1995; 42(6):455-500.
[Immunogenetics. 1995]Biotechniques. 1998 Aug; 25(2):244-50.
[Biotechniques. 1998]Clin Cancer Res. 2004 Mar 1; 10(5):1605-12.
[Clin Cancer Res. 2004]Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2002 Mar; 9(2):257-66.
[Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2002]Int J Cancer. 2004 Jul 10; 110(5):721-9.
[Int J Cancer. 2004]