![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||
Copyright © 2008 by The National Academy of Sciences of the USA Evolution From the Cover Assembly of the cnidarian camera-type eye from vertebrate-like components *Institute of Molecular Genetics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Videnska 1083, 142 20 Prague 4, Czech Republic; §Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, University of Tokyo, 5-1-5 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8562, Japan; and ¶National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-3655 †To whom correspondence may be addressed. E-mail: kozmik/at/img.cas.cz, Email: joramp/at/nei.nih.gov, or Email: vlcek/at/img.cas.cz Edited by Eviatar Nevo, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel, and approved April 11, 2008 Author contributions: Z.K., J.P., V.P., and C.V. designed research; Z.K., J.R., K.J., Y.M., S.K., and C.V. performed research; Z.K. and I.K. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; Z.K., J.R., K.J., Y.M., P.V., H.S., S.K., J.P., V.P., and C.V. analyzed data; and Z.K., J.P., and C.V. wrote the paper. ‡J.R. and K.J. contributed equally to this work. Received January 14, 2008. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract Animal eyes are morphologically diverse. Their assembly, however, always relies on the same basic principle, i.e., photoreceptors located in the vicinity of dark shielding pigment. Cnidaria as the likely sister group to the Bilateria are the earliest branching phylum with a well developed visual system. Here, we show that camera-type eyes of the cubozoan jellyfish, Tripedalia cystophora, use genetic building blocks typical of vertebrate eyes, namely, a ciliary phototransduction cascade and melanogenic pathway. Our findings indicative of parallelism provide an insight into eye evolution. Combined, the available data favor the possibility that vertebrate and cubozoan eyes arose by independent recruitment of orthologous genes during evolution. Keywords: evolution, gene, opsin, photoreceptor, cnidaria The assembly of diverse animal eyes requires two fundamental building blocks, photoreceptors and dark shielding pigment. The function of photoreceptors is to convert light (stream of photons) into intracellular signaling. The photoreceptor cells (PRCs) are classified into two distinct types: rhabdomeric, characteristic of vision in invertebrate eyes; and ciliary, characteristic of vision in vertebrate eyes (1). In both ciliary and rhabdomeric PRCs, the seven-transmembrane receptor (opsin) associates with retinal to constitute a functional photosensitive pigment. Each photoreceptor type uses a separate phototransduction cascade. Rhabdomeric photoreceptors employ r-opsins and a phospholipase C cascade, whereas ciliary photoreceptors use c-opsins and a phosphodiesterase (PDE) cascade (2, 3). In general, the dark pigment reduces photon scatter and orients the direction optimally sensitive to light. The biochemical nature of the dark pigment appears more diverse than the phototransduction cascades used by the PRCs. Vertebrate eyes use melanin as their exclusive dark pigment. However, among invertebrates, pterins constitute the eye pigment in the polychaete Platynereis dumerilii (4), pterins and ommochromes are accumulated in eyes of Drosophila (5), and melanin is found rarely such as in the inverse cup-like eyes of the planarian, Dugesia (6). Cnidaria, the likely sister group to the Bilateria, constitute the earliest branching phylum containing a well developed visual system. For example, Cubozoa (known as “box jellyfish”) have camera-type eyes with cornea, lens, and retina; unexpectedly, the cubozoan retina has ciliated PRCs that are typical for vertebrate eyes (7–9). Cubomedusae are active swimmers that are able to make directional changes in response to visual stimuli (10). The cubozoan jellyfish, Tripedalia cystophora (Fig. 1
In the present work, we characterize genes required for the assembly of camera-type eyes in Tripedalia. We show that the genetic building blocks typical of vertebrate eyes, namely ciliary opsin and the melanogenic pathway, are used by the cubozoan eyes. Although our findings of unsuspected parallelism are consistent with either an independent origin or common ancestry of cubozoan and vertebrate eyes, we believe the present data favor the former alternative. Results Ciliary Opsin Is Expressed in Camera-Type Eyes of Tripedalia. We screened an expressed sequence tag (EST) library derived from rhopalia of Tripedalia to identify the jellyfish genes that are involved in vision; orthologues of other invertebrates and vertebrates were identified by phylogenetic analysis. Of the four opsin types present at the base of the bilaterians [rhabdomeric (r-opsins), ciliary (c-opsin), Go-opsins, and peropsin/RGR (12–14)], the Tripedalia opsin EST clustered with the c-opsins, an orthology consistent with the conservation of the characteristic stretch of deduced amino acids between the transmembrane domain VII and cytoplasmic tail [supporting information (SI) Fig. S1]. This region includes the c-opsin fingerprint tripeptide NR/KQ (NRS in Tripedalia) that is critical for coupling to the downstream phototransduction cascade through interaction with a GTP-binding protein subunit Gαt in the vertebrate rods and cones (15). An antibody generated against Tripedalia c-opsin recognized a single electrophoretic band in protein extracts prepared from rhopalia and COS-7 cells transfected with c-opsin cDNA (Fig. 1 Spectral Sensitivity of Tripedalia c-Opsin. To address the question of whether the identified Tripedalia c-opsin can function as a true visual opsin, we tested its photochemical properties. Tripedalia c-opsin was expressed in COS-1 cells and reconstituted as a functional photosensitive pigment with 11-cis- retinal. The reconstituted c-opsin was most sensitive to the blue–green region of the spectrum with a peak absorbance (λmax) at 465–470 nm (Fig. 1 Tripedalia Orthologues of Vertebrate-Like Phototransduction Genes. In vertebrates, activated heterotrimeric G proteins use cGMP PDE for signal transduction. In accordance with our identification of a vertebrate-like c-opsin in Tripedalia, we found that the catalytic subunit of pde expressed in the Tripedalia rhopalium phylogenetically clusters with the group of GAF domain-containing PDEs including vertebrate rod- and cone-specific PDE6 (Fig. S2A). Furthermore, we identified other components of the ciliary-type cascade associated with deactivation or adaptation of phototransduction, such as the inhibitory subunit of phosphodiesterase (PDE6D), phosducin and guanylate cyclase (Fig. S2 B–D). Thus, the nature of the genes expressed in the rhopalia (detected by RT-PCR; Fig. S3) suggests that the camera-type eye of Tripedalia uses a ciliary-type phototransduction cascade similar to that of vertebrates. Melanin Granules in Tripedalia PRCs. A conspicuous ring of dark shielding pigment surrounds the area of c-opsin expression (compare Fig. 1
Mitf Expression in Lens and Crystallin Expression in Pigmented PRCs of Nonlens Eyes of Tripedalia. In addition to expression in the pigmented PRCs of camera-type eyes, mitf mRNA was detected in the outermost cells of the Tripedalia lens (Fig. 3 Discussion The present work reveals surprising similarities in the genetic components used for visual system development in vertebrates and cubozoan jellyfish. If Cubozoa and vertebrates express orthologous c-opsins in their PRCs and make use of the same pigmentation pathway including the key transcription factor Mitf, does this represent a parallel evolution or conservation of an ancestral “eye” program between those evolutionarily distant animal phyla (Fig. 4
Even though ciliary and rhabdomeric photoreceptive systems coexist throughout the animal taxa (1), the present evidence suggests that their evolutionary histories differ. For photodetection, all invertebrate PRCs examined employ Go/r-opsin, and all vertebrate PRCs employ c-opsin (2, 3). Importantly, c-opsin is expressed in the ciliary PRCs in the brain of the polychaete worm, P. dumerili, whereas r-opsin is expressed in rhabdomeric PRCs in the eyes (13). Based on this result, Arendt et al. (13) have proposed that early metazoans possessed a single type of PRC with an ancestral opsin for light detection that later diversified into two distinct PRC and opsin types. The rhabdomeric PRCs (with r-opsin) were used in the eyes for photoreception, whereas the ciliary PRCs (with c-opsin) were incorporated into the evolving brain. These findings are consistent with vertebrates confining r-opsin to retinal ganglion cells apparently for photoperiodicity and using ciliary PRCs containing c-opsins exclusively for photoreception (rods and cones). Taken together, the data suggest that the ganglion cells of the vertebrate retina are the evolutionary descendents of rhabdomeric PRCs (3, 13). Moreover, because no identified opsin gene in cnidarians (27) contains a typical r-opsin fingerprint tripeptide HPK critical for coupling to the downstream phototransduction cascade, it was proposed that r-opsins are a bilaterian innovation that originated after the separation of the cnidarian and bilaterian lineages (Fig. 4 All eyes have shielding pigment typically found in cells adjacent to the PRCs. Melanin, the dark pigment of Tripedalia eyes, presumably performs the same function in vertebrate eyes as in the simple cup-like eyes of a basal lophotrochozoan, Dugesia (6). Interestingly, Dugesia uses another pigment, an ommochrome, as the body pigment (2, 6). Pterins constitute the dark eye pigment of the polychaete P. dumerilii (4), and pterins and ommochromes are the pigments in eyes of Drosophila (5). Thus, as with the opsins, Tripedalia shares the same dark pigment in the eye with vertebrates. Unlike in the Dugesia eye, the camera-type Tripedalia eye combines the photoreceptor and pigment functions in the same cell consistent with an ancestral (basal) condition (Fig. 4 For the common-ancestry model to be true, the cnidarian-bilaterian ancestor (CBA) must have had the same genetic determinants as its descendants. The common-ancestry scenario for cubozoan and vertebrate eyes requires, however, that animals in many bilaterian phyla lost their eyes that were initially assembled by using the same building blocks as in present-day vertebrates and Cubozoa (c-opsins, melanin) to explain the exclusive occurrence of rhabdomeric PRCs in invertebrate eyes. There is no obvious explanation for such a specific selection against ciliary PRCs to be used for visual purposes. Eyes in general provide a freely moving animal with a tremendous advantage, and as such there should be a constant selection for eye maintenance, except in, for example, cave or underground animals. Although not definitive, there are at least two additional complications to the common-ancestry model that arise if one invokes the developmental argument that similar transcription factor cascades may direct development of vertebrate and cubozoan eyes. The first is that PaxB, a Pax2/6/8-related transcription factor, is used in Tripedalia (30) instead of Pax6 as in vertebrates (31) as well as flies (32, 33) and other species (34). The second is the apparent evolutionary “promiscuity” of developmental cascades in general; entire regulatory circuits can be co-opted for development of different cell types, tissues, or organs. For example, the Pax–Six–Eya–Dach gene regulatory network has a fundamental role in Drosophila visual system development but is also used for specification of muscle cells or placodes in vertebrates (35). Co-opting orthologous suites of genes for similar functions could be a possible explanation for independent or parallel evolution of cubozoan and vertebrate eyes with ciliary-type PRCs (Fig. 4 In addition to sharing the same genetic building blocks in their PRCs (ciliary phototransduction, melanogenic pathway), cubozoans and vertebrates both use a cellular lens to increase visual sensitivity and produce a sharp image in the desired plane of focus. The optical properties of cellular lenses are caused by the high-level expression of proteins collectively called crystallins (ref. 41 and this work). In striking contrast to the conservation of opsins as the visual pigments in the PRCs, the lens crystallins are diverse proteins that are often taxon-specific, i.e., entirely different proteins function as crystallins in different species. Similar transcription factors including those of the Pax gene family have been independently recruited for the regulation of nonhomologous crystallin genes in Tripedalia and vertebrates (30, 42, 43) to achieve a gradient of refractive index within their transparent lenses. The independent recruitment of lens crystallins is consistent with parallel evolution of cubozoan and vertebrate eyes and provides a striking example of the role of convergence in eye evolution. Finally, the present findings of mitf in the lens and J1-crystallin in the pigmented slit and pit ocelli of Tripedalia support the idea that the cellular cubozoan lens arose from a pigmented cell ancestor. It is known that pigment cells may acquire the capacity to secrete lens-forming material (44). Combined, our data on J1-crystallin and mitf expression suggest that the cellular cubozoan lens with its remarkable ability to refract light without spherical aberration (11) originated from a pigment cell ancestor and that the primitive cup-like eyes located on the cubozoan rhopalia might be evolutionary forerunners of camera-type eyes. In conclusion, the present study uncovers a surprising molecular parallelism in the eye design of vertebrates and cubozoan jellyfish. Although the current data do not distinguish unambiguously between the common-ancestry and independent-recruitment scenarios, we propose that they lean in the direction of the latter, favoring multiple independent reorganizations of common elements and independent recruitments of similar suites of genes during evolution of the diverse eyes. Materials and Methods Jellyfish Collection and Culture. T. cystophor a was collected and cultured as described in ref. 43. Isolation of Rhopalium-Expressed Genes and Phylogenetic Analysis. An EST cDNA library was generated from rhopalia mRNA, and 2,433 individual clones from the library were sequenced by using an ABI capillary sequencer. The accession numbers for the clones are as follows: c-opsin (EU310498), oca (EU310502), mitf (EU310499), catalytic pde (EU310500), inhibitory pde6d (EU310501) and guanylate cyclase (EU310503). Details on phylogenetic analysis including the accession numbers of individual sequences are described in SI Materials and Methods. RNA in Situ Hybridization. Jellyfish were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA), cryoprotected in 30% sucrose overnight at 4°C, and embedded and frozen in OCT (Tissue Tek). RNA in situ hybridization was performed as described in ref. 43. Immunohistochemistry. The cryosections were refixed in 4% PFA for 10 min, washed three times with PBS, permeabilized with PBT (PBS + 0.1% Tween 20) for 15 min, and blocked in 10% BSA in PBT for 30 min. The primary antibodies were diluted in 1% BSA in PBT, incubated overnight at room temperature, washed three times with PBS, and incubated with secondary antibodies in 1% BSA in PBT. The sections were counterstained with DAPI and mounted. Primary antibodies used were: anti-Tripedalia c-opsin, anti-Tripedalia J1-crystallin, and anti-acetylated tubulin (Sigma). The following secondary antibodies were used: Alexa Fluor 488- or 594-conjugated goat anti-mouse or anti-rabbit IgG (Molecular Probes). Generation of Antibodies, COS-7 Cell Transfection, and Western Blotting. Antibodies directed against Tripedalia c-opsin and J1-crystallin were prepared by immunization of rabbits as follows. The C-terminal region of c-opsin cDNA corresponding to amino acids 274–329 was cloned into the expression vector pET42, expressed in BL21(DE3)RIPL cells (Stratagene), and purified by using His6 tag chromatography. The N-terminal peptide of J1-crystallin AAIVGSLVADAATQPVHK was attached to KLH via the C-terminal lysine and used for immunization. Monkey kidney COS-7 cells were transfected with CMV-c-opsin (amino acids 1–329) expression vector by using FuGENE6 reagent (Roche). Total extracts were prepared from c-opsin-transfected cells, mock-transfected cells, and rhopalia and were analyzed by Western blotting by using anti-c-opsin rabbit serum and chemiluminescent detection kit (Pierce). To avoid formation of multimeric opsin complexes, protein extracts from transfected cells were diluted and heated at low temperature (37°C) before SDS/PAGE. Fontana–Masson Method. The cryosections were hydrated in distilled water and then incubated with Fontana silver nitrate working solution (2.5% silver nitrate) at 56°C for 1–2 h. After three washes in distilled water, sections were treated in 0.2% gold chloride at room temperature for 2 min, rinsed once in distilled water, placed in 5% sodium thiosulfate at room temperature for 1 min, washed again in water, and mounted. Melanin Bleach Procedure. Bleaching was performed either after Fontana–Masson staining or RNA in situ hybridization. The sections were hydrated in distilled water and exposed to 0.25% potassium permanganate for 30 min at room temperature. The sections were treated with 5% oxalic acid for 5 min, washed with water, and mounted. Transmission Electron Microscopy. Rhopalia excised from juvenile medusae were treated with Karnovsky fixative (2.5% glutaraldehyde, 2.5% paraformaldehyde in cacodylate buffer) for 24 h at 4°C. Fixed tissue was washed 12 h in 0.1% cacodylate buffer at 4°C. Karnovsky-fixed juvenile rhopalia and PFA-fixed adult rhopalia were postfixed in 2% OsO4 for 2 h at 4°C and then washed in water. Samples were dehydrated in series of ethanol solutions, transferred to pure acetone, and embedded in Poly/Bed 812/Araldite 502 resin. Ultrathin sections (600–800 nm) were cut on Ultracut E (Reichert–Jung), placed on copper grids, and treated with 2.5% uranyl acetate for 1 h followed by lead citrate for 15 min. The material was examined by transmission electron microscopy (Jeol-1011), and images were taken with a MEGAview III Soft imaging system. Expression, Reconstitution, and Spectroscopic Analysis of Tripedalia c-opsin. Tripedalia c-opsin cDNA was expressed in transfected COS-1 cells. Transfected cells were resuspended with 5 μM 11-cis-retinal, solubilized with 1% dodecyl maltoside, and the resulting c-opsin photopigment was purified by using immobilized 1D4 (Cell Culture Center, Minneapolis, MN). The UV-visible absorption spectrum was recorded for the c-opsin photopigment from 250 to 650 nm at 0.5-nm intervals by using the Hitachi U3010 dual-beam spectrometer at 20°C. Five replicates were performed in the dark and five more after 3 min of light exposure (with a <440-nm cut-off filter). The λmax value was taken from the dark–light difference spectrum. For additional details, see SI Materials and Methods. Supporting Information
Acknowledgments. We thank Drs. Ales Cvekl and Stanislav Tomarev for comments on the manuscript and Mrs. Veronika Noskova for excellent technical assistance. We are grateful to Prof. Tom Tosteson for kind support during our collecting trip to Puerto Rico. This work was supported in part by Project AV0Z50520514 awarded by the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic and by Center for Applied Genomics Grant 1M6837805002 awarded by the Ministry of Education, Youth, and Sports of the Czech Republic and by the intramural research program of the National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health. Footnotes The authors declare no conflict of interest. This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/0800388105/DCSupplemental. References 1. Fernald RD. Casting a genetic light on the evolution of eyes. Science. 2006;313:1914–1918. [PubMed] 2. Arendt D, Wittbrodt J. Reconstructing the eyes of Urbilateria. Philos Trans R Soc London Ser B. 2001;356:1545–1563. [PubMed] 3. Arendt D. Evolution of eyes and photoreceptor cell types. Int J Dev Biol. 2003;47:563–571. [PubMed] 4. Viscontini M, Hummel W, Fischer A. Isolation of pterin dimers from the eyes of Platynereis dumerilii (German). Helv Chim Acta. 1970;53:1207–1209. 5. Shoup JR. The development of pigment granules in the eyes of wild-type and mutant Drosophila melanogaster. J Cell Biol. 1966;29:223–249. [PubMed] 6. Hase S, et al. Characterization of the pigment produced by the planarian, Dugesia ryukyuensis. Pigment Cell Res. 2006;19:248–249. [PubMed] 7. Conant FS. Notes on the Cubomedusae. Johns Hopkins Univ Circ. 1897;132:8–10. 8. Pearse JS, Pearse VB. Vision of cubomedusan jellyfishes. Science. 1978;199:458. [PubMed] 9. Yamasu T, Yoshida M. Fine structure of complex ocelli of a cubomedusan, Tamoya bursaria. Haeckel Cell Tissue Res. 1976;170:325–339. 10. Garm A, O'Connor M, Parkefelt L, Nilsson DE. Visually guided obstacle avoidance in the box jellyfish Tripedalia cystophora and Chiropsella bronzie. J Exp Biol. 2007;210:3616–3623. [PubMed] 11. Nilsson DE, Gislen L, Coates MM, Skogh C, Garm A. Advanced optics in a jellyfish eye. Nature. 2005;435:201–205. [PubMed] 12. Terakita A. The opsins. Genome Biol. 2005;6:213. [PubMed] 13. Arendt D, Tessmar-Raible K, Snyman H, Dorresteijn AW, Wittbrodt J. Ciliary photoreceptors with a vertebrate-type opsin in an invertebrate brain. Science. 2004;306:869–871. [PubMed] 14. Raible F, et al. Opsins and clusters of sensory G protein-coupled receptors in the sea urchin genome. Dev Biol. 2006;300:461–475. [PubMed] 15. Marin EP, et al. The amino terminus of the fourth cytoplasmic loop of rhodopsin modulates rhodopsin-transducin interaction. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:1930–1936. [PubMed] 16. Coates MM, Garm A, Theobald JC, Thompson SH, Nilsson DE. The spectral sensitivity of the lens eyes of a box jellyfish, Tripedalia cystophora (Conant). J Exp Biol. 2006;209:3758–3765. [PubMed] 17. Arnheiter H. Evolutionary biology: Eyes viewed from the skin. Nature. 1998;391:632–633. [PubMed] 18. Oetting WS, Garrett SS, Brott M, King RA. P gene mutations associated with oculocutaneous albinism type II (OCA2). Hum Mutat. 2005;25:323. [PubMed] 19. Rinchik EM, et al. A gene for the mouse pink-eyed dilution locus and for human type II oculocutaneous albinism. Nature. 1993;361:72–76. [PubMed] 20. Fukamachi S, et al. Conserved function of medaka pink-eyed dilution in melanin synthesis and its divergent transcriptional regulation in gonads among vertebrates. Genetics. 2004;168:1519–1527. [PubMed] 21. Protas ME, et al. Genetic analysis of cavefish reveals molecular convergence in the evolution of albinism. Nat Genet. 2006;38:107–111. [PubMed] 22. Hodgkinson CA, et al. Mutations at the mouse microphthalmia locus are associated with defects in a gene encoding a novel basic-helix–loop–helix-zipper protein. Cell. 1993;74:395–404. [PubMed] 23. Nguyen M, Arnheiter H. Signaling and transcriptional regulation in early mammalian eye development: A link between FGF and MITF. Development. 2000;127:3581–3591. [PubMed] 24. Opdecamp K, et al. Melanocyte development in vivo and in neural crest cell cultures: Crucial dependence on the Mitf basic helix–loop–helix zipper transcription factor. Development. 1997;124:2377–2386. [PubMed] 25. Goding CR. Mitf from neural crest to melanoma: Signal transduction and transcription in the melanocyte lineage. Genes Dev. 2000;14:1712–1728. [PubMed] 26. Piatigorsky J, Horwitz J, Norman BL. J1-crystallins of the cubomedusan jellyfish lens constitute a novel family encoded in at least three intronless genes. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:11894–11901. [PubMed] 27. Plachetzki DC, Degnan BM, Oakley TH. The origins of novel protein interactions during animal opsin evolution. PLoS ONE. 2007;2:e1054. [PubMed] 28. Gehring WJ, Ikeo K. Pax 6: Mastering eye morphogenesis and eye evolution. Trends Genet. 1999;15:371–377. [PubMed] 29. Nilsson DE, Pelger S. A pessimistic estimate of the time required for an eye to evolve. Proc Biol Sci. 1994;256:53–58. [PubMed] 30. Kozmik Z, et al. Role of Pax genes in eye evolution: A cnidarian PaxB gene uniting Pax2 and Pax6 functions. Dev Cell. 2003;5:773–785. [PubMed] 31. Hill RE, et al. Mouse small eye results from mutations in a paired-like homeobox-containing gene. Nature. 1991;354:522–525. [PubMed] 32. Quiring R, Walldorf U, Kloter U, Gehring WJ. Homology of the eyeless gene of Drosophila to the small eye gene in mice and Aniridia in humans. Science. 1994;265:785–789. [PubMed] 33. Halder G, Callaerts P, Gehring WJ. Induction of ectopic eyes by targeted expression of the eyeless gene in Drosophila. Science. 1995;267:1788–1792. [PubMed] 34. Gehring WJ. Historical perspective on the development and evolution of eyes and photoreceptors. Int J Dev Biol. 2004;48:707–717. [PubMed] 35. Silver SJ, Rebay I. Signaling circuitries in development: Insights from the retinal determination gene network. Development. 2005;132:3–13. [PubMed] 36. Fernald RD. Eyes: Variety, development, and evolution. Brain Behav Evol. 2004;64:141–147. [PubMed] 37. Fernald RD. Evolving eyes. Int J Dev Biol. 2004;48:701–705. [PubMed] 38. Salvini-Plawen LV, Mayr E. On the evolution of photoreceptors and eyes. Evol Biol. 1977;10:207–263. 39. Kortschak RD, Samuel G, Saint R, Miller DJ. EST analysis of the cnidarian Acropora millepora reveals extensive gene loss and rapid sequence divergence in the model invertebrates. Curr Biol. 2003;13:2190–2195. [PubMed] 40. Putnam NH, et al. Sea anemone genome reveals ancestral eumetazoan gene repertoire and genomic organization. Science. 2007;317:86–94. [PubMed] 41. Piatigorsky J. Gene Sharing and Evolution: The Diversity of Protein Functions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ Press; 2007. 42. Cvekl A, Yang Y, Chauhan BK, Cveklova K. Regulation of gene expression by Pax6 in ocular cells: A case of tissue-preferred expression of crystallins in lens. Int J Dev Biol. 2004;48:829–844. [PubMed] 43. Kozmik Z, et al. Cubozoan crystallins: Evidence for convergent evolution of Pax regulatory sequences. Evolution Dev. 2008;10:52–61. 44. Eakin RM, Westfall JA. Further observation on the fine structure of some invertebrate eyes. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat. 1964;62:310–332. [PubMed] |
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||
Science. 2006 Sep 29; 313(5795):1914-8.
[Science. 2006]Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2001 Oct 29; 356(1414):1545-63.
[Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2001]Int J Dev Biol. 2003; 47(7-8):563-71.
[Int J Dev Biol. 2003]J Cell Biol. 1966 May; 29(2):223-49.
[J Cell Biol. 1966]Pigment Cell Res. 2006 Jun; 19(3):248-9.
[Pigment Cell Res. 2006]Science. 1978 Jan 27; 199(4327):458.
[Science. 1978]J Exp Biol. 2007 Oct; 210(Pt 20):3616-23.
[J Exp Biol. 2007]Nature. 2005 May 12; 435(7039):201-5.
[Nature. 2005]Genome Biol. 2005; 6(3):213.
[Genome Biol. 2005]Science. 2004 Oct 29; 306(5697):869-71.
[Science. 2004]Dev Biol. 2006 Dec 1; 300(1):461-75.
[Dev Biol. 2006]J Biol Chem. 2000 Jan 21; 275(3):1930-6.
[J Biol Chem. 2000]J Exp Biol. 2006 Oct; 209(Pt 19):3758-65.
[J Exp Biol. 2006]Nature. 1998 Feb 12; 391(6668):632-3.
[Nature. 1998]Hum Mutat. 2005 Mar; 25(3):323.
[Hum Mutat. 2005]Nature. 1993 Jan 7; 361(6407):72-6.
[Nature. 1993]Genetics. 2004 Nov; 168(3):1519-27.
[Genetics. 2004]Nat Genet. 2006 Jan; 38(1):107-11.
[Nat Genet. 2006]J Biol Chem. 1993 Jun 5; 268(16):11894-901.
[J Biol Chem. 1993]PLoS One. 2007 Oct 17; 2(10):e1054.
[PLoS One. 2007]Science. 2006 Sep 29; 313(5795):1914-8.
[Science. 2006]Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2001 Oct 29; 356(1414):1545-63.
[Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2001]Int J Dev Biol. 2003; 47(7-8):563-71.
[Int J Dev Biol. 2003]Science. 2004 Oct 29; 306(5697):869-71.
[Science. 2004]PLoS One. 2007 Oct 17; 2(10):e1054.
[PLoS One. 2007]Pigment Cell Res. 2006 Jun; 19(3):248-9.
[Pigment Cell Res. 2006]Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2001 Oct 29; 356(1414):1545-63.
[Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2001]J Cell Biol. 1966 May; 29(2):223-49.
[J Cell Biol. 1966]Nature. 1998 Feb 12; 391(6668):632-3.
[Nature. 1998]Trends Genet. 1999 Sep; 15(9):371-7.
[Trends Genet. 1999]Proc Biol Sci. 1994 Apr 22; 256(1345):53-8.
[Proc Biol Sci. 1994]Dev Cell. 2003 Nov; 5(5):773-85.
[Dev Cell. 2003]Nature. 1991 Dec 19-26; 354(6354):522-5.
[Nature. 1991]Science. 1994 Aug 5; 265(5173):785-9.
[Science. 1994]Science. 1995 Mar 24; 267(5205):1788-92.
[Science. 1995]Int J Dev Biol. 2004; 48(8-9):707-17.
[Int J Dev Biol. 2004]Dev Cell. 2003 Nov; 5(5):773-85.
[Dev Cell. 2003]Int J Dev Biol. 2004; 48(8-9):829-44.
[Int J Dev Biol. 2004]Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat. 1964 Apr 9; 62():310-32.
[Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat. 1964]Nature. 2005 May 12; 435(7039):201-5.
[Nature. 2005]