![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology Loss of Regulators of Vacuolar ATPase Function and Ceramide Synthesis Results in Multidrug Sensitivity in Schizosaccharomyces pombe Paterson Institute for Cancer Research, University of Manchester, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, United Kingdom *Corresponding author. Mailing address for N. Jones: Paterson Institute for Cancer Research, University of Manchester, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, United Kingdom. Phone: 44 161 446 3129. Fax: 44 161 446 3109. E-mail: njones/at/picr.man.ac.uk. Mailing address for C. R. M. Wilkinson: Paterson Institute for Cancer Research, University of Manchester, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, United Kingdom. Phone: 44 161 446 3129. Fax: 44 161 446 3109. E-mail: cwilkinson/at/picr.man.ac.uk †Present address: Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario M5G1X5, Canada. Received February 1, 2008; Accepted April 11, 2008. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract We undertook a screen to isolate determinants of drug resistance in fission yeast and identified two genes that, when mutated, result in sensitivity to a range of structurally unrelated compounds, some of them commonly used in the clinic. One gene, rav1, encodes the homologue of a budding yeast protein which regulates the assembly of the vacuolar ATPase. The second gene, lac1, encodes a homologue of genes that are required for ceramide synthesis. Both mutants are sensitive to the chemotherapeutic agent doxorubicin, and using the naturally fluorescent properties of this compound, we found that both rav1 and lac1 mutations result in an increased accumulation of the drug in cells. The multidrug-sensitive phenotype of rav1 mutants can be rescued by up-regulation of the lag1 gene which encodes a homologue of lac1, whereas overexpression of either lac1 or lag1 confers multidrug resistance on wild-type cells. These data suggest that changing the amount of ceramide synthase activity in cells can influence innate drug resistance. The function of Rav1 appears to be conserved, as we show that SpRav1 is part of a RAVE-like complex in fission yeast and that loss of rav1 results in defects in vacuolar (H+)-ATPase activity. Thus, we conclude that loss of normal V-ATPase function results in an increased sensitivity of Schizosaccharomyces pombe cells to drugs. The rav1 and lac1 genes are conserved in both higher eukaryotes and various pathogenic fungi. Thus, our data could provide the basis for strategies to sensitize tumor cells or drug-resistant pathogenic fungi to drugs. One of the biggest challenges facing modern medicine is that of multidrug resistance (MDR), a phenomenon whereby cells acquire tolerance to a range of structurally and functionally unrelated drugs, such as those used in chemotherapy or compounds employed to treat fungal infections. The common occurrence of MDR in tumors represents a major problem in the successful chemotherapeutic treatment of cancer. Candida albicans is an opportunistic fungal pathogen that can cause severe infections in humans, particularly in those who are immunocompromised such as AIDS patients and individuals undergoing chemotherapy. Fluconazole is widely used to treat such infections; however, resistance to this drug can occur, resulting in reduced treatment efficacy (33). There is a need, therefore, to identify pathways that control resistance, as their manipulation might restore drug sensitivity to MDR cells. MDR arises mainly through the increased efflux of drugs from the cell. This transport is mediated through membrane transporters, which fall into a small number of protein superfamilies such as the major facilitator superfamily and the ATP-binding cassette transporters. These transporters have a broad specificity for a variety of structurally unrelated compounds. In some cases, their natural role is to protect the cell against toxins whereas others have more physiological targets but can, upon overexpression or mutation, confer drug resistance (13). Yeast has long been used as a model organism to study many aspects of cell biology, but recent studies are now utilizing it in anticancer drug discovery (36). Genome-wide screens of budding yeast have been employed to identify the targets and pathways that are acted upon by a particular drug (1, 24, 31). One pathway that seems to control innate resistance to drugs in budding yeast involves the vacuolar (H+)-ATPase (V-ATPase) (31, 50). This is a large, multisubunit complex found in all eukaryotic cells. It is present in the membranes of several organelles such as the Golgi apparatus, endosomes, and vacuoles or lysosomes and is responsible for the acidification of these compartments by coupling the hydrolysis of ATP to the transport of protons across membranes. The V-ATPase consists of two subcomplexes: the V0 complex, which is embedded in the membrane and forms a channel for protons, and the V1 complex, which is bound to the cytosolic surface of the V0 complex and catalyzes the hydrolysis of ATP. In eukaryotic cells, this enzyme plays a role in many physiological processes, including receptor-mediated endocytosis and protein sorting along the secretory pathway (17, 28). The subunits of the budding yeast V-ATPase are encoded by the VMA genes, mutations in which lead to the so-called Vma− phenotype, whereby cells display sensitivity to high levels of extracellular calcium, high pH, heavy metals, and a variety of drugs (31, 50). A number of studies suggest that the role of the budding yeast V-ATPase in determining resistance to drugs appears to be conserved in mammalian cells (25, 30, 31). One factor thought to play a role in controlling V-ATPase function is Rav1 (also known as Soi3), an evolutionarily conserved protein that was initially identified in budding yeast, where it was found as part of a Skp1-containing complex called RAVE (35). Also present in the budding yeast RAVE complex is a protein called Rav2. In other eukaryotes, there are homologues of Skp1 and Rav1, but while most fungi have a homologue of Rav2, there is no obvious candidate in fission yeast. To date, the role of Rav1 and RAVE in the regulation of V-ATPase activity has only been studied in budding yeast. The RAVE complex binds to the V1 domain of the V-ATPase, and consistent with a role in regulating this complex, Scrav1Δ and Scrav2Δ mutants display both a temperature-sensitive Vma− phenotype and defects in vacuolar acidification. RAVE appears to promote the assembly of V-ATPase (35, 40), and Rav1 function is also required for trafficking between the early endosome and the vacuole, presumably through its control of endosome acidification (38). Here we have identified and characterized two fission yeast genes that, when mutated, give rise to multidrug sensitivity. The first, rav1, encodes the homologue of budding yeast Rav1. The second, lac1, encodes a homologue of two budding yeast proteins, Lag1 and Lac1, which are required for the synthesis of ceramide (11, 34). MATERIALS AND METHODS Growth of Schizosaccharomyces pombe. The strains used in this study are listed in Table 1. S. pombe was grown as previously described (26). Gene deletion and epitope tagging were carried out as previously described (4). The sequences of the oligonucleotides used are available upon request. The fission yeast genomic library used to identify rav1 and lag1 was as previously described (27). The lag1, lac1, and vma3 cDNAs were cloned into the pREP1 vector (and the lag1 cDNA was also cloned into pREP41). The sequences of the oligonucleotides used are available upon request. Expression from the nmt41 promoter in pREP41 gives a lower level of expression than expression from the nmt1 promoter in pREP1 (6).
Isolation of rav1-1. Wild-type S. pombe was plated to a density of 3 × 103cells/plate and exposed to a predetermined dose of UV calculated to give one lesion per cell. Sensitivity acquired due to mutation was selected by replica plating resultant colonies to yeast extract (YE) plates with and without 50 μg/ml doxorubicin (D1515; Sigma). Determination of drug sensitivities. Drug sensitivity was determined by using dilution assays in which 5 μl of a cell suspension containing 2 × 106cells/ml and 10-fold dilutions from this concentration were pipetted onto YE plates containing appropriate ranges for each drug. The drugs used were obtained from the following suppliers: doxorubicin, Sigma (D1515); fluconazole, gift from Pfizer; bleomycin, Fluka (15361); camptothecin, Sigma (C9911); hydroxyurea, Sigma (H8627); cycloheximide, Sigma (C4859). To assess their sensitivity to heat shock, we grew cells to mid-log phase and treated them at 50°C for 15 min before performing a dilution assay. Microscopy. Imaging of doxorubicin accumulation was performed as already described, except that cells were incubated in doxorubicin for 90 min (41). For indirect immunofluorescence assay, cells were fixed as previously described (48); anti-myc (MCA1929; Serotec) was used at a dilution of 1 to 100. Secondary antibodies were diluted 250-fold (Alexa Fluor 488 anti-mouse, A-11001; Molecular Probes). Filipin staining was done as previously described (45). Quinacrine staining was carried out as previously described (16). Cells were imaged by using the Deltavision system (Applied Precision Instruments); the softworx (API) software was utilized to control image capture. Protein analysis. Immunoprecipitations. For isolating Rav1-interacting proteins with subsequent identification by mass spectrometry, cell extracts were made from rav1-13 myc cells in buffer containing 50 mM Tris (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% NP-40, and protease inhibitors (Roche). Identification of Vma2 was done by the Cancer Research UK mass spectrometry service as previously described (8). The peptides matched to Vma2 covered 52.3% of the protein. All other immunoprecipitations were as previously described (21). RESULTS Isolation of rav1-1 and lac1Δ multidrug-sensitive mutants. In order to define pathways involved in resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs in S. pombe, a screen was performed to isolate mutations resulting in a multidrug-sensitive phenotype by using the anticancer drug doxorubicin. One particular mutant, which we named the rav1-1 mutant for reasons described below, was sensitive to doxorubicin but displayed robust growth on control plates (Fig. (Fig.1A).1A
Loss of the S. pombe lac1 gene also results in multidrug sensitivity. The second genomic clone (clone 2), which resulted in partial rescue of the rav1-1 mutant, corresponded to the SPAC1A6.09c ORF. This encodes a protein homologous to Lag1 and Lac1 in S. cerevisiae, which are required for the de novo synthesis of ceramide. Only one of the two proteins is required for this process, but loss of both ScLag1 and ScLac1 results in a severe growth defect and the inability to synthesize ceramide (11, 34). Sphingolipids are constituents of the membrane bilayer; their backbone consists of ceramide. Along with sterols, sphingolipids form localized structures in the membrane called lipid rafts which are thought to be involved in the biosynthetic delivery of proteins to the yeast plasma membrane (37). The protein encoded by SPAC1A6.09c displays 38 and 39% identity to ScLag1 and Lac1, respectively, and has previously been assigned the name Lag1 (49; http://www.genedb.org/genedb/pombe/index.jsp). There is also a second S. pombe homologue of ScLag1 and Lac1 encoded by the SPBC4F6.02 ORF. This protein is 40 and 41% identical to ScLac1 and ScLag1, respectively, and 35% identical to SpLag1.We have named the gene that encodes this protein lac1. In addition to rescuing the multidrug sensitivity of the rav1-1 mutant, we also found that lag1 overexpression resulted in partial rescue of the rav1Δ mutant's phenotypes (Fig. (Fig.1C).1C The identification of a Rav1 homologue in S. pombe led us to speculate that Rav1 may be playing a role in this yeast similar to that of its counterpart in S. cerevisiae. Therefore, we assessed the growth of Sprav1Δ cells on medium containing high levels of calcium chloride, as mutants defective in vacuolar ATPase function are sensitive to calcium (43, 51). The rav1Δ mutant cells were sensitive to calcium, indicating that SpRav1 may also play a role in regulating vacuolar function. Furthermore, loss of Splac1, but not lag1, resulted in sensitivity to calcium, suggesting that Lac1 may influence vacuolar function (Fig. (Fig.2B2B In addition to the drug sensitivity assays, two further pieces of data demonstrated the differences between lag1 and lac1. Firstly, overexpression of lac1 from the same heterologous promoter used to drive the expression of lag1 did not result in rescue of the rav1Δ mutant's multidrug-sensitive phenotype (Fig. (Fig.2D).2D The ability of lag1 to rescue the multidrug sensitivity of the rav1Δ mutant and the phenotypes associated with loss of lac1 suggested that lag1/lac1 might be involved in controlling the innate drug resistance of wild-type cells. To address this, we overexpressed lag1 and lac1 in the wild type and exposed the cells to medium containing drugs. As shown in Fig. Fig.2F,2F In summary, we have identified two genes, rav1 and lac1, whose loss results in multidrug sensitivity. Overexpression of lag1, a homologue of lac1, resulted in increasing resistance to drugs in the rav1-1 and rav1Δ mutants, whereas overexpression of lag1 and lac1 in the wild type resulted in increased drug resistance, suggesting that altering the dosage of these ceramide synthase components can modulate innate drug resistance. Mutations in rav1 and lac1 lead to an increased amount of doxorubicin in the cell. A possible explanation for the drug sensitivities of the rav1Δ and lac1Δ mutants is that they are more permeable to drugs. Alternatively, these mutants may have a reduced capacity to extrude drugs. Both scenarios could lead to increased amounts of drugs in the cell. We tested this by imaging cells treated with doxorubicin. It is a naturally fluorescent compound, a feature that has been used to visualize its uptake into cells (41). The growth of rav1Δ and lac1Δ mutant cells was impaired on plates containing this drug (Fig. (Fig.3A).3A
In rav1Δ and lac1Δ mutant cells, the drug appears to be distributed throughout the cytoplasm and does not appear to enter the vacuoles (Fig. (Fig.3B3B SpRav1 is part of a RAVE-like complex and influences V-ATPase function. In order to determine how loss of SpRav1 results in multidrug sensitivity, we sought to characterize how SpRav1 functions in the cell. First we investigated whether the RAVE complex is conserved between budding and fission yeasts. As shown in Fig. Fig.4A,4A
There is not an obvious candidate for Rav2 in S. pombe, but we did notice an uncharacterized ORF (SPBC3H7.12) with very weak similarity to ScRav2: 13% identity over 224 amino acids. This ORF encodes a protein of 287 amino acids, which is considerably shorter than ScRav2 and its fungal homologues. An alignment of this ORF, which we have renamed Rav2, with the putative Rav2 sequences from C. albicans and C. glabrata along with the S. cerevisiae Rav2 sequence is shown (Fig. (Fig.4B).4B A deletion mutant of rav2 displayed a mild sensitivity to a range of drugs including doxorubicin, cycloheximide, and bleomycin, and its growth was slightly retarded by high levels of calcium, consistent with a similar but more muted multidrug-sensitive phenotype than that of the rav1Δ mutant (Fig. (Fig.4D4D To gain further insight into the role of the S. pombe RAVE complex, we sought to identify further Rav1-interacting partners by isolating proteins that coprecipitated with Rav1. The resulting material was separated by gel electrophoresis, and we observed one strong band upon silver staining of the gel (Fig. (Fig.5A).5A
Defective V-ATPase activity will result in a reduction in vacuolar acidification; therefore, we assessed the status of the vacuoles in the Sprav1Δ mutant by using quinacrine, which is a weakly basic dye that accumulates in acidic compartments (46). In wild-type cells, the dye accumulated in the vacuoles as expected; however, in the rav1Δ mutant there was no vacuolar accumulation of quinacrine but instead we observed a weak staining of the cytoplasm and the vacuolar membranes (Fig. (Fig.5B).5B Next we asked whether the multidrug-sensitive phenotype of the rav1Δ mutant was due to defective V-ATPase activity or to an additional role for Rav1. Mutants lacking V1 subunits in budding yeast are known to have a disrupted V1 structure and abolished V-ATPase function (14, 18, 29, 44). A deletion mutant of the S. pombe homologue of Vma1 (which contains subunit A of the V1 subcomplex) was multidrug sensitive (Fig. (Fig.5C5C The interaction of Rav1 with the V-ATPase in budding yeast has been proposed to be transient, and consistent with this, ScRav1 has been found to be localized throughout the cytoplasm (35) and also found in punctate structures consistent with early endosomal membranes (38). We found that SpRav1 is also localized to the cytoplasm, where it appeared to be distributed largely in discrete punctate structures, reminiscent of the latter budding yeast study (Fig. (Fig.5D5D Taking all of the above data together, we conclude that SpRav1 is part of a RAVE-like complex in fission yeast. SpRav1 interacts with and appears to regulate the V-ATPase; lack of this function results in defective V-ATPase activity, which renders the cells sensitive to a variety of drugs. Loss of S. pombe lac1 results in heat shock sensitivity and disruption of plasma membrane sterol distribution. We also sought to characterize the lac1Δ mutant. In budding yeast, loss of LAG1 or LAC1 results in viable cells whereas the double mutant is inviable or very sick, suggesting a redundancy of function between these two genes. This lethality is believed to result from an inability to synthesize ceramide (5, 11, 34). Our drug sensitivity assays showed that loss of lac1 but not lag1 resulted in sensitivity to drugs (Fig. (Fig.2).2
Our data suggested that loss of lac1 also resulted in defective V-ATPase activity, as the lac1Δ mutant displayed Vma− phenotypes such as sensitivity to calcium and heavy metals (Fig. 2B and C We found that the multidrug sensitivity of lac1Δ mutant cells is not merely due to misregulation of the V-ATPase, as a lac1Δ vma1Δ double mutant displayed more severe phenotypes than either single mutant (data not shown). Based on sequence homology to the budding yeast counterparts, we propose that in the Splac1Δ mutant, ceramide synthesis is highly compromised, resulting in misregulation of sphingolipid metabolism. In addition, lac1/lag1 function seems to play an important role in regulating V-ATPase activity, as the lac1 mutant displays Vma− phenotypes and defects in vacuolar acidification while overexpression of lag1 rescues the rav1Δ Vma− and multidrug-sensitive phenotypes. Indeed, overexpression of lag1 was able to restore acidification to the vacuoles as quinacrine accumulated in the vacuoles of a rav1 mutant as it also did in cells where the expression of rav1 had been restored (Fig. (Fig.6D).6D We hypothesized that overexpression of lag1 rescues the multidrug sensitivity of rav1Δ through the restoration of vacuolar acidification (which is defective due to inefficient V-ATPase assembly). Overexpression of lag1 would not, therefore, be expected to rescue the drug sensitivity of a V-ATPase subunit deletion mutant, as in this case, assembly and thus activity of the V-ATPase would be completely abolished (18, 44). To test this, we overexpressed lag1 in a mutant with a deletion of vma3, which encodes a subunit of the V0 subcomplex. Overexpression of lag1 from two different strengths of the heterologous nmt promoter did not rescue sensitivity to fluconazole (Fig. (Fig.6E)6E As shown in Fig. Fig.6F,6F DISCUSSION In this study, we have identified two fission yeast genes, rav1 and lac1, that play an important role in determining the innate resistance of fission yeast to a variety of toxic compounds. This is the first study to demonstrate that loss of either of these evolutionarily conserved proteins, in any organism, results in such a multidrug-sensitive phenotype. These genes were not identified in genome-wide screens in budding yeast for mutants that gave rise to multidrug sensitivity, illustrating the usefulness of carrying out such studies with S. pombe as well as S. cerevisiae. In the case of Scrav1Δ, a mild sensitivity to fluconazole but not to other drugs was previously described (31), but neither the LAG1 nor the LAC1 gene has been identified in such screens (1, 24). In addition, we found that overexpression of the lag1 gene in rav1 mutants resulted in increasing resistance to drugs. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first demonstration that increasing the gene dosage of a ceramide synthase component through overexpression is able to modulate drug resistance. Indeed, the ability of the rav1 mutants to grow on drugs was greatly enhanced when the lag1 cDNA was highly overexpressed under the control of the heterologous nmt1 promoter compared to the genomic clone (Fig. (Fig.1C1C Conservation of the RAVE complex. We have shown that the RAVE complex, as identified in budding yeast, is likely to be conserved at very least among fungi. Moreover, the function of RAVE also seems to have been conserved, as loss of Sprav1 results in defective V-ATPase activity. We propose, therefore, that Rav1 also serves to regulate the assembly of the V-ATPase in fission yeast. Our genetic analysis suggested that the multidrug-sensitive phenotype of the rav1Δ mutant is due to reduced V-ATPase activity. Indeed, although it has been implicated in other organisms, this is the first study to demonstrate that loss of fission yeast V-ATPase activity results in multidrug sensitivity. Intriguingly, however, in the case of doxorubicin, there appeared to be an increased sensitivity in the rav1Δ vma1Δ double mutant (Fig. (Fig.5C).5C Overexpression of lag1 rescues the Vma− phenotypes of a rav1 mutant. We found that overexpression of lag1 rescued the Vma− phenotypes and the vacuolar acidification defect of a rav1 mutant. Given the likely role of lag1 in promoting ceramide synthesis, this suggests a link between sphingolipid metabolism and V-ATPase function. It is possible that altering membrane composition might promote the assembly of the V-ATPase. Alternatively, it might upregulate the activity of any residual V-ATPase already assembled. Sphingolipids with a C26 acyl group are required for the generation of V1 subcomplexes with ATPase activity (7). One possibility that could explain both our findings and those of Chung et al. is that some aspect of RAVE function or assembly requires a specific sphingolipid composition. It will be interesting to determine whether overexpression of lag1 promotes V-ATPase assembly in the absence of Rav1. The multidrug-sensitive phenotype of rav1Δ and lac1Δ mutants. Why are rav1 and lac1 mutants sensitive to a range of drugs? We propose that it is unlikely that each of these mutants could simultaneously modulate the multiple processes affected by the range of drugs to which they are sensitive. It seems more probable that loss of rav1 or lac1 affects the efflux or influx of drugs, as indicated by the increased accumulation of doxorubicin in these mutants (Fig. (Fig.3B).3B While Lac1/Lag1 function may affect the activity of the V-ATPase, lac1Δ and Vma subunit double mutants showed severely retarded growth in the absence of drugs, suggesting that other functions are affected in these cells besides V-ATPase activity (data not shown). An alteration in the lipid composition of the membrane could change the rate of passive uptake of drugs into the cell. Indeed, mutations in various ERG genes encoding components of the ergosterol biosynthesis pathway render budding yeast sensitive to a number of drugs (31). On the other hand, a number of studies with budding yeast have linked defective sphingolipid and ergosterol synthesis to the inefficient delivery of transporters to the plasma membrane, suggesting that trafficking is dependent upon the cellular lipid composition (2, 3, 22, 32, 42). We propose that trafficking defects may be occurring in the lac1Δ mutant due to a disruption of membrane composition, in addition to any defects caused by a reduction in V-ATPase activity. Indeed, in budding yeast, Lag1/Lac1 is required for normal delivery of glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored proteins to the plasma membrane (5). Interestingly, there is a link between MDR and the expression of genes involved in lipid metabolism in budding yeast. The transcriptional activators Pdr1 and -3 regulate the expression of multiple genes encoding components of the sphingolipid biosynthesis pathway; this includes LAC1 but not LAG1. Pdr1 and -3 also control the expression of transporters that mediate the efflux of a variety of drugs; therefore, these transcriptional regulators appear to coordinate the control of both drug transporters and the membrane environment in which they function (12, 20). Homologues of both Rav1 and Lac1/Lag1 can be identified in mammalian cells, as well as in a number of pathogenic fungi, including C. albicans. Thus, these factors could be potential targets, the modulation of which could be used to combat MDR that arises in tumors and fungal infections. Acknowledgments We thank Takashi Toda for anti-Skp1 antibodies, Sara Mole and Kaoru Takegawa for strains, Pfizer for fluconazole, Steve Bagley for help with microscopy, Patty Kane for helpful advice, and Pall Jonsson and Crispin Miller for help with bioinformatic analysis. Footnotes Published ahead of print on 25 April 2008.REFERENCES 1. Aouida, M., N. Page, A. Leduc, M. Peter, and D. Ramotar. 2004. A genome-wide screen in Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals altered transport as a mechanism of resistance to the anticancer drug bleomycin. Cancer Res. 641102-1109. [PubMed] 2. Bagnat, M., A. Chang, and K. Simons. 2001. Plasma membrane proton ATPase Pma1p requires raft association for surface delivery in yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell 124129-4138. [PubMed] 3. Bagnat, M., and K. Simons. 2002. Cell surface polarization during yeast mating. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 9914183-14188. [PubMed] 4. Bähler, J., J. Q. Wu, M. S. Longtine, N. G. Shah, A. McKenzie III, A. B. Steever, A. Wach, P. Philippsen, and J. R. Pringle. 1998. Heterologous modules for efficient and versatile PCR-based gene targeting in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Yeast 14943-951. [PubMed] 5. Barz, W. P., and P. Walter. 1999. Two endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane proteins that facilitate ER-to-Golgi transport of glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored proteins. Mol. Biol. Cell 101043-1059. [PubMed] 6. Basi, G., E. Schmid, and K. Maundrell. 1993. TATA box mutations in the Schizosaccharomyces pombe nmt1 promoter affect transcription efficiency but not the transcription start point or thiamine repressibility. Gene 123131-136. [PubMed] 7. Chung, J. H., R. L. Lester, and R. C. Dickson. 2003. Sphingolipid requirement for generation of a functional v1 component of the vacuolar ATPase. J. Biol. Chem. 27828872-28881. [PubMed] 8. Craven, R. A., S. Hanrahan, N. Totty, P. Harnden, A. J. Stanley, E. R. Maher, A. L. Harris, W. S. Trimble, P. J. Selby, and R. E. Banks. 2006. Proteomic identification of a role for the von Hippel Lindau tumour suppressor in changes in the expression of mitochondrial proteins and septin 2 in renal cell carcinoma. Proteomics 63880-3893. [PubMed] 9. Dickson, R. C. 1998. Sphingolipid functions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: comparison to mammals. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 6727-48. [PubMed] 10. Eide, D. J., S. Clark, T. M. Nair, M. Gehl, M. Gribskov, M. L. Guerinot, and J. F. Harper. 2005. Characterization of the yeast ionome: a genome-wide analysis of nutrient mineral and trace element homeostasis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genome Biol. 6R77. [PubMed] 11. Guillas, I., P. A. Kirchman, R. Chuard, M. Pfefferli, J. C. Jiang, S. M. Jazwinski, and A. Conzelmann. 2001. C26-CoA-dependent ceramide synthesis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is operated by Lag1p and Lac1p. EMBO J. 202655-2665. [PubMed] 12. Hallstrom, T. C., L. Lambert, S. Schorling, E. Balzi, A. Goffeau, and W. S. Moye-Rowley. 2001. Coordinate control of sphingolipid biosynthesis and multidrug resistance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 27623674-23680. [PubMed] 13. Higgins, C. F. 2007. Multiple molecular mechanisms for multidrug resistance transporters. Nature 446749-757. [PubMed] 14. Ho, M. N., K. J. Hill, M. A. Lindorfer, and T. H. Stevens. 1993. Isolation of vacuolar membrane H+-ATPase-deficient yeast mutants; the VMA5 and VMA4 genes are essential for assembly and activity of the vacuolar H+-ATPase. J. Biol. Chem. 268221-227. [PubMed] 15. Ikebe, C., K. Kominami, T. Toda, and K. Nakayama. 2002. Isolation and characterization of a novel F-box protein Pof10 in fission yeast. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2901399-1407. [PubMed] 16. Iwaki, T., T. Goa, N. Tanaka, and K. Takegawa. 2004. Characterization of Schizosaccharomyces pombe mutants defective in vacuolar acidification and protein sorting. Mol. Genet. Genomics 271197-207. [PubMed] 17. Kane, P. M. 2006. The where, when, and how of organelle acidification by the yeast vacuolar H+-ATPase. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 70177-191. [PubMed] 18. Kane, P. M., M. C. Kuehn, I. Howald-Stevenson, and T. H. Stevens. 1992. Assembly and targeting of peripheral and integral membrane subunits of the yeast vacuolar H+-ATPase. J. Biol. Chem. 267447-454. [PubMed] 19. Klionsky, D. J., P. K. Herman, and S. D. Emr. 1990. The fungal vacuole: composition, function, and biogenesis. Microbiol. Rev. 54266-292. [PubMed] 20. Kolaczkowski, M., A. Kolaczkowska, B. Gaigg, R. Schneiter, and W. S. Moye-Rowley. 2004. Differential regulation of ceramide synthase components LAC1 and LAG1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eukaryot. Cell 3880-892. [PubMed] 21. Lawrence, C. L., H. Maekawa, J. L. Worthington, W. Reiter, C. R. Wilkinson, and N. Jones. 2007. Regulation of Schizosaccharomyces pombe Atf1 protein levels by Sty1-mediated phosphorylation and heterodimerization with Pcr1. J. Biol. Chem. 2825160-5170. [PubMed] 22. Lee, M. C., S. Hamamoto, and R. Schekman. 2002. Ceramide biosynthesis is required for the formation of the oligomeric H+-ATPase Pma1p in the yeast endoplasmic reticulum. J. Biol. Chem. 27722395-22401. [PubMed] 23. Lehmann, A., S. Katayama, C. Harrison, S. Dhut, K. Kitamura, N. McDonald, and T. Toda. 2004. Molecular interactions of fission yeast Skp1 and its role in the DNA damage checkpoint. Genes Cells 9367-382. [PubMed] 24. Lum, P. Y., C. D. Armour, S. B. Stepaniants, G. Cavet, M. K. Wolf, J. S. Butler, J. C. Hinshaw, P. Garnier, G. D. Prestwich, A. Leonardson, P. Garrett-Engele, C. M. Rush, M. Bard, G. Schimmack, J. W. Phillips, C. J. Roberts, and D. D. Shoemaker. 2004. Discovering modes of action for therapeutic compounds using a genome-wide screen of yeast heterozygotes. Cell 116121-137. [PubMed] 25. Ma, L., and M. S. Center. 1992. The gene encoding vacuolar H+-ATPase subunit C is overexpressed in multidrug-resistant HL60 cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 182675-681. [PubMed] 26. Moreno, S., A. Klar, and P. Nurse. 1991. Molecular genetic analysis of fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Methods Enzymol. 194795-823. [PubMed] 27. Nakamura, T., M. Nakamura-Kubo, A. Hirata, and C. Shimoda. 2001. The Schizosaccharomyces pombe spo3+ gene is required for assembly of the forespore membrane and genetically interacts with psy1+-encoding syntaxin-like protein. Mol. Biol. Cell 123955-3972. [PubMed] 28. Nishi, T., and M. Forgac. 2002. The vacuolar (H+)-ATPases—nature's most versatile proton pumps. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 394-103. [PubMed] 29. Noumi, T., C. Beltran, H. Nelson, and N. Nelson. 1991. Mutational analysis of yeast vacuolar H+-ATPase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 881938-1942. [PubMed] 30. Ouar, Z., M. Bens, C. Vignes, M. Paulais, C. Pringel, J. Fleury, F. Cluzeaud, R. Lacave, and A. Vandewalle. 2003. Inhibitors of vacuolar H+-ATPase impair the preferential accumulation of daunomycin in lysosomes and reverse the resistance to anthracyclines in drug-resistant renal epithelial cells. Biochem. J. 370185-193. [PubMed] 31. Parsons, A. B., R. L. Brost, H. Ding, Z. Li, C. Zhang, B. Sheikh, G. W. Brown, P. M. Kane, T. R. Hughes, and C. Boone. 2004. Integration of chemical-genetic and genetic interaction data links bioactive compounds to cellular target pathways. Nat. Biotechnol. 2262-69. [PubMed] 32. Proszynski, T. J., R. W. Klemm, M. Gravert, P. P. Hsu, Y. Gloor, J. Wagner, K. Kozak, H. Grabner, K. Walzer, M. Bagnat, K. Simons, and C. Walch-Solimena. 2005. A genome-wide visual screen reveals a role for sphingolipids and ergosterol in cell surface delivery in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 10217981-17986. [PubMed] 33. Rex, J. H., M. G. Rinaldi, and M. A. Pfaller. 1995. Resistance of Candida species to fluconazole. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 391-8. [PubMed] 34. Schorling, S., B. Vallee, W. P. Barz, H. Riezman, and D. Oesterhelt. 2001. Lag1p and Lac1p are essential for the acyl-CoA-dependent ceramide synthase reaction in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Biol. Cell 123417-3427. [PubMed] 35. Seol, J. H., A. Shevchenko, A. Shevchenko, and R. J. Deshaies. 2001. Skp1 forms multiple protein complexes, including RAVE, a regulator of V-ATPase assembly. Nat. Cell Biol. 3384-391. [PubMed] 36. Simon, J. A., and A. Bedalov. 2004. Yeast as a model system for anticancer drug discovery. Nat. Rev. Cancer 4481-492. [PubMed] 37. Simons, K., and W. L. Vaz. 2004. Model systems, lipid rafts, and cell membranes. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 33269-295. [PubMed] 38. Sipos, G., J. H. Brickner, E. J. Brace, L. Chen, A. Rambourg, F. Kepes, and R. S. Fuller. 2004. Soi3p/Rav1p functions at the early endosome to regulate endocytic trafficking to the vacuole and localization of trans-Golgi network transmembrane proteins. Mol. Biol. Cell 153196-3209. [PubMed] 39. Smardon, A. M., and P. M. Kane. 2007. RAVE is essential for the efficient assembly of the C subunit with the vacuolar H+-ATPase. J. Biol. Chem. 28226185-26194. [PubMed] 40. Smardon, A. M., M. Tarsio, and P. M. Kane. 2002. The RAVE complex is essential for stable assembly of the yeast V-ATPase. J. Biol. Chem. 27713831-13839. [PubMed] 41. Thornton, G., C. R. Wilkinson, W. M. Toone, and N. Jones. 2005. A novel pathway determining multidrug sensitivity in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Genes Cells 10941-951. [PubMed] 42. Umebayashi, K., and A. Nakano. 2003. Ergosterol is required for targeting of tryptophan permease to the yeast plasma membrane. J. Cell Biol. 1611117-1131. [PubMed] 43. Umemoto, N., Y. Ohya, and Y. Anraku. 1991. VMA11, a novel gene that encodes a putative proteolipid, is indispensable for expression of yeast vacuolar membrane H+-ATPase activity. J. Biol. Chem. 26624526-24532. [PubMed] 44. Umemoto, N., T. Yoshihisa, R. Hirata, and Y. Anraku. 1990. Roles of the VMA3 gene product, subunit c of the vacuolar membrane H+-ATPase on vacuolar acidification and protein transport: a study with VMA3-disrupted mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 26518447-18453. [PubMed] 45. Wachtler, V., S. Rajagopalan, and M. K. Balasubramanian. 2003. Sterol-rich plasma membrane domains in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. J. Cell Sci. 116867-874. [PubMed] 46. Weisman, L. S., R. Bacallao, and W. Wickner. 1987. Multiple methods of visualizing the yeast vacuole permit evaluation of its morphology and inheritance during the cell cycle. J. Cell Biol. 1051539-1547. [PubMed] 47. Wells, G. B., R. C. Dickson, and R. L. Lester. 1998. Heat-induced elevation of ceramide in Saccharomyces cerevisiae via de novo synthesis. J. Biol. Chem. 2737235-7243. [PubMed] 48. Wilkinson, C. R., M. Wallace, M. Morphew, P. Perry, R. Allshire, J. P. Javerzat, J. R. McIntosh, and C. Gordon. 1998. Localization of the 26S proteasome during mitosis and meiosis in fission yeast. EMBO J. 176465-6476. [PubMed] 49. Winter, E., and C. P. Ponting. 2002. TRAM, LAG1 and CLN8: members of a novel family of lipid-sensing domains? Trends Biochem. Sci. 27381-383. [PubMed] 50. Yoshida, S., and Y. Anraku. 2000. Characterization of staurosporine-sensitive mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: vacuolar functions affect staurosporine sensitivity. Mol. Gen. Genet. 263877-888. [PubMed] 51. Zhang, J. W., K. J. Parra, J. Liu, and P. M. Kane. 1998. Characterization of a temperature-sensitive yeast vacuolar ATPase mutant with defects in actin distribution and bud morphology. J. Biol. Chem. 27318470-18480. [PubMed] |
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995 Jan; 39(1):1-8.
[Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995]Nature. 2007 Apr 12; 446(7137):749-57.
[Nature. 2007]Nat Rev Cancer. 2004 Jun; 4(6):481-92.
[Nat Rev Cancer. 2004]Cancer Res. 2004 Feb 1; 64(3):1102-9.
[Cancer Res. 2004]Cell. 2004 Jan 9; 116(1):121-37.
[Cell. 2004]Nat Biotechnol. 2004 Jan; 22(1):62-9.
[Nat Biotechnol. 2004]Nat Biotechnol. 2004 Jan; 22(1):62-9.
[Nat Biotechnol. 2004]Mol Gen Genet. 2000 Jun; 263(5):877-88.
[Mol Gen Genet. 2000]Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2006 Mar; 70(1):177-91.
[Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2006]Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2002 Feb; 3(2):94-103.
[Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2002]Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1992 Jan 31; 182(2):675-81.
[Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1992]Nat Cell Biol. 2001 Apr; 3(4):384-91.
[Nat Cell Biol. 2001]J Biol Chem. 2002 Apr 19; 277(16):13831-9.
[J Biol Chem. 2002]Mol Biol Cell. 2004 Jul; 15(7):3196-209.
[Mol Biol Cell. 2004]EMBO J. 2001 Jun 1; 20(11):2655-65.
[EMBO J. 2001]Mol Biol Cell. 2001 Nov; 12(11):3417-27.
[Mol Biol Cell. 2001]Methods Enzymol. 1991; 194():795-823.
[Methods Enzymol. 1991]Yeast. 1998 Jul; 14(10):943-51.
[Yeast. 1998]Mol Biol Cell. 2001 Dec; 12(12):3955-72.
[Mol Biol Cell. 2001]Gene. 1993 Jan 15; 123(1):131-6.
[Gene. 1993]Genes Cells. 2005 Oct; 10(10):941-51.
[Genes Cells. 2005]EMBO J. 1998 Nov 16; 17(22):6465-76.
[EMBO J. 1998]J Cell Sci. 2003 Mar 1; 116(Pt 5):867-74.
[J Cell Sci. 2003]Mol Genet Genomics. 2004 Mar; 271(2):197-207.
[Mol Genet Genomics. 2004]J Biol Chem. 2007 Feb 23; 282(8):5160-70.
[J Biol Chem. 2007]Genes Cells. 2004 May; 9(5):367-82.
[Genes Cells. 2004]Proteomics. 2006 Jul; 6(13):3880-93.
[Proteomics. 2006]J Biol Chem. 2007 Feb 23; 282(8):5160-70.
[J Biol Chem. 2007]EMBO J. 2001 Jun 1; 20(11):2655-65.
[EMBO J. 2001]Mol Biol Cell. 2001 Nov; 12(11):3417-27.
[Mol Biol Cell. 2001]Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 2004; 33():269-95.
[Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 2004]Trends Biochem Sci. 2002 Aug; 27(8):381-3.
[Trends Biochem Sci. 2002]J Biol Chem. 1991 Dec 25; 266(36):24526-32.
[J Biol Chem. 1991]J Biol Chem. 1998 Jul 17; 273(29):18470-80.
[J Biol Chem. 1998]Genome Biol. 2005; 6(9):R77.
[Genome Biol. 2005]Genes Cells. 2005 Oct; 10(10):941-51.
[Genes Cells. 2005]Genes Cells. 2005 Oct; 10(10):941-51.
[Genes Cells. 2005]Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2006 Mar; 70(1):177-91.
[Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2006]Microbiol Rev. 1990 Sep; 54(3):266-92.
[Microbiol Rev. 1990]Nat Cell Biol. 2001 Apr; 3(4):384-91.
[Nat Cell Biol. 2001]Nat Cell Biol. 2001 Apr; 3(4):384-91.
[Nat Cell Biol. 2001]J Biol Chem. 2007 Sep 7; 282(36):26185-94.
[J Biol Chem. 2007]J Cell Biol. 1987 Oct; 105(4):1539-47.
[J Cell Biol. 1987]J Biol Chem. 1993 Jan 5; 268(1):221-7.
[J Biol Chem. 1993]J Biol Chem. 1992 Jan 5; 267(1):447-54.
[J Biol Chem. 1992]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Mar 1; 88(5):1938-42.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991]J Biol Chem. 1990 Oct 25; 265(30):18447-53.
[J Biol Chem. 1990]Nat Cell Biol. 2001 Apr; 3(4):384-91.
[Nat Cell Biol. 2001]Mol Biol Cell. 2004 Jul; 15(7):3196-209.
[Mol Biol Cell. 2004]Mol Biol Cell. 1999 Apr; 10(4):1043-59.
[Mol Biol Cell. 1999]EMBO J. 2001 Jun 1; 20(11):2655-65.
[EMBO J. 2001]Mol Biol Cell. 2001 Nov; 12(11):3417-27.
[Mol Biol Cell. 2001]Annu Rev Biochem. 1998; 67():27-48.
[Annu Rev Biochem. 1998]J Biol Chem. 1998 Mar 27; 273(13):7235-43.
[J Biol Chem. 1998]J Cell Sci. 2003 Mar 1; 116(Pt 5):867-74.
[J Cell Sci. 2003]J Biol Chem. 1992 Jan 5; 267(1):447-54.
[J Biol Chem. 1992]J Biol Chem. 1990 Oct 25; 265(30):18447-53.
[J Biol Chem. 1990]Nat Biotechnol. 2004 Jan; 22(1):62-9.
[Nat Biotechnol. 2004]Cancer Res. 2004 Feb 1; 64(3):1102-9.
[Cancer Res. 2004]Cell. 2004 Jan 9; 116(1):121-37.
[Cell. 2004]J Biol Chem. 2003 Aug 1; 278(31):28872-81.
[J Biol Chem. 2003]Nat Biotechnol. 2004 Jan; 22(1):62-9.
[Nat Biotechnol. 2004]Mol Biol Cell. 2001 Dec; 12(12):4129-38.
[Mol Biol Cell. 2001]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Oct 29; 99(22):14183-8.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002]J Biol Chem. 2002 Jun 21; 277(25):22395-401.
[J Biol Chem. 2002]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Dec 13; 102(50):17981-6.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005]