Logo of bmcgenoBioMed Centralsearchsubmit a manuscriptregisterthis articleBMC Genomics
BMC Genomics. 2008; 9: 248.
Published online May 28, 2008. doi:  10.1186/1471-2164-9-248
PMCID: PMC2435238

Identification and characteristics of microRNAs from Bombyx mori

Abstract

Background

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small RNA molecules that regulate gene expression by targeting messenger RNAs (mRNAs) and causing mRNA cleavage or translation blockage. Of the 355 Arthropod miRNAs that have been identified, only 21 are B. mori miRNAs that were predicted computationally; of these, only let-7 has been confirmed by Northern blotting.

Results

Combining a computational method based on sequence homology searches with experimental identification based on microarray assays and Northern blotting, we identified 46 miRNAs, an additional 21 plausible miRNAs, and a novel small RNA in B. mori. The latter, bmo-miR-100-like, was identified using the known miRNA aga-miR-100 as a probe; bmo-miR-100-like was detected by microarray assay and Northern blotting, but its precursor sequences did not fold into a hairpin structure. Among these identified miRNAs, we found 12 pairs of miRNAs and miRNA*s. Northern blotting revealed that some B. mori miRNA genes were expressed only during specific stages, indicating that B. mori miRNA genes (e.g., bmo-miR-277) have developmentally regulated patterns of expression. We identified two miRNA gene clusters in the B. mori genome. bmo-miR-2b, which is found in the gene cluster bmo-miR-2a-1/bmo-miR-2a-1*/bmo-miR-2a-2/bmo-miR-2b/bmo-miR-13a*/bmo-miR-13b, encodes a newly identified member of the mir-2 family. Moreover, we found that methylation can increase the sensitivity of a DNA probe used to detect a miRNA by Northern blotting. Functional analysis revealed that 11 miRNAs may regulate 13 B. mori orthologs of the 25 known Drosophila miRNA-targeted genes according to the functional conservation. We predicted the binding sites on the 1671 3'UTR of B. mori genes; 547 targeted genes, including 986 target sites, were predicted. Of these target sites, 338 had perfect base pairing to the seed region of 43 miRNAs. From the predicted genes, 61 genes, each of them with multiple predicted target sites, should be considered excellent candidates for future functional studies. Biological classification of predicted miRNA targets showed that "binding", "catalytic activity" and "physiological process" were over-represented for the predicted genes.

Conclusion

Combining computational predictions with microarray assays, we identified 46 B. mori miRNAs, 13 of which were miRNA*s. We identified a novel small RNA and 21 plausible B. mori miRNAs that could not be located in the available B. mori genome, but which could be detected by microarray. Thirteen and 547 target genes were predicted according to the functional conservation and binding sites, respectively. Identification of miRNAs in B. mori, particularly those that are developmentally regulated, provides a foundation for subsequent functional studies.

Background

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of endogenous, small, non-coding, single-stranded RNA. They comprise approximately 19–25 nucleotides that are embedded within the stem regions of hairpin transcripts (called "pre-miRNAs") [1-9]. The first miRNA genes, lin-4 [5] and let-7 [6], were identified in Caenorhabditis elegans about a decade ago. Many endogenously encoded miRNAs have been detected in mammals, plants, insects, worms, and viruses through cloning, Northern blotting, microarray assay, sequencing of short RNA molecules [1-9], and computation [10-20]. By December 2007, 5,395 hairpin sequence entries, containing 5,234 mature miRNAs, have been stored in miRBase [21-23]. Sequence analyses have shown that some mature miRNAs are phylogenetically conserved, particularly in the first 8 residues at the 5' end in species of the same kingdom (let-7 miRNAs are present in the human, mouse, rat, cow, dog, pig, chimpanzee, monkey, fish, and various insects, including Bombyx mori (B. mori)) [21]. In rare cases, mature miRNA sequences are conserved between animals and plants. For instance, mir-854, which is conserved in C. elegans, mouse, and human, has also been identified in plants [24]. However, hairpin sequences of precursor miRNAs are phylogenetically diverse. In addition to these characteristics, the genomic locations of miRNA precursor genes and the folding structures of miRNAs have been used to identify previously unknown miRNAs [10-20]. Lai et al. (2003) [11] stated that three characteristics allow miRNA genes to be identified using computational approaches: (i) miRNAs are generally derived from 70–100 nucleotide precursor transcripts having an extended stem-loop structure; (ii) miRNAs are usually conserved between genomes of related species; and (iii) miRNAs display a characteristic pattern of evolutionary divergence [10-20]. Additionally, genomic mapping of known miRNAs has enabled identification of orthologous miRNAs in other species (e.g., B. mori) where genomic annotations are lacking [25,26].

miRNAs are well-studied RNA interference (RNAi) molecules that silence gene expression of sequence-specific targeted messenger RNAs (mRNAs) in all species in which they have been found [27-29]. miRNAs silence gene expression by inducing miRNA-guided mRNA degradation, or by inhibiting translation by forming a miRNA-protein complex that binds to targeted mRNAs [1-4]. Some miRNAs target the non-coding region of a RNA gene transcript [29]. miRNAs are a class of small RNAs that have temporal and spatial specific expression patterns, and that have important roles in the development, proliferation, differentiation, transformation, and death of cells [30-33]. miRNAs affect cell fate during all stages of life, from renewable, pluripotent embryonic cells to fully differentiated cells; miRNAs can also affect aberrant cell growth in some tumors and carcinomas [32]. The ability of miRNAs to silence gene expression through a post-transcriptional mechanism has promoted their use as genetic tools in basic mechanistic studies; miRNAs are also being developed as biomarkers, therapeutic targets and therapeutic agents.

Based on computational cross-genome comparison predictions and experimental identifications, over 5,000 miRNAs have been identified in various organisms, including 152 miRNAs from Drosophila melanogaster, 73 from Drosophila pseudoobscura, 54 from Apis mellifera, 45 from Anopheles gambiae, 21 from B. mori, 137 from C. elegans, and 541 human miRNAs (miRBase release 10.1, December 2007). B. mori is a species of Arthropod, closely related to Nematodes and Platyhelminthes. MiRBase contains 355 miRNA genes in Arthropods (mosquito, honey bee and fruit flies), 232 in Nematodes (C. elegans and C. briggsae) and 63 in Platyhelminthes (Schmidtea mediterranea) [34]. Of the 355 Arthropod miRNAs identified, 21 are B. mori miRNAs that were predicted computationally by our research group [19]; of these, only let-7 has been confirmed by Northern blotting [35,36].

In this study, we report the first set of B. mori miRNA genes from larva, moth and pupa. We established our initial computational method for predicting miRNAs by genome-wide miRNA mapping using the available B. mori genomic sequences and Arthropod miRNAs. We further confirmed their identities using comprehensive microarray profiling and Northern blotting. miRNA targeted genes were predicted according to functional conservation and binding sites. Biological classification of predicted targets was determined by GO analysis.

Results

Prediction of B. mori miRNAs

Based on the sequences of all miRNAs previously identified in Arthropoda, we searched the B. mori genome by BLAST. According to the four criteria described in Materials and Methods, we identified 31 potential B. mori miRNAs and their precursor sequences. Information on predicted B. mori miRNAs, including names, lengths, source, and genomic position, are listed in Table Table1.1. The length of the 31 predicted B. mori miRNAs ranged from 19 nt to 26 nt. We used the mfold program to fold each of the 31 predicted B. mori pre-miRNA sequences, ranging in length from 70 nt to 102 nt, and allowing G-U pairing, into hairpin structures [37]. The free energy of folding for these hairpin structures ranged from -24.3 kcal/mol to -48.4 kcal/mol.

Table 1
Information for all 46 predicted B. mori miRNA sequences

miRNA microarray assay

Using the predicted B. mori miRNAs as guides, we designed probes to hybridize to targets in total RNA isolated from B. mori pupae and moths. Probes were classified into one of three groups, i.e., those designed to detect: 1) the 31 predicted miRNAs and their opposite-strand miRNAs; 2) the 704 known miRNAs in miRBase, which consist of miRNAs from several species, including six worm species, D. melanogaster (78 probes), D. pseudoobscura (4 probes), A. gambiae (14 probes), A. mellifera (7 probes), C. elegans (114 probes), C. briggsae (39 probes), and human (448 probes); and 3) control sequences, including the 5S rRNA of B. mori and D. melanogaster. The chip contained 954 probes in total. Each probe was repeated three times on the chip to ensure assay reproducibility.

Microarray results are shown in Figure Figure1.1. Comparison of the signal strengths for the miRNAs detected by microarray assays of RNA isolated from B. mori pupa and moth stages are shown in Figure Figure2.2. In most cases, results between spots for the same miRNA genes were very consistent in RNA isolated from B. mori pupa and moth (k = 0.908, b = 0.3104, R2 = 0.8025). However, expression levels of some miRNAs exhibited obvious differences between the two developmental stages. Sequences exhibiting signal strengths of >80 were considered to be detected miRNA sequences. We detected 114 small RNAs from total RNA isolated from B. mori pupae and moths based on this cutoff. We applied a more stringent analysis by excluding miRNAs differing by only one single base in their sequences or by two bases near sequence ends, and identified 67 miRNAs and a novel small RNA. Of these 67 detected miRNAs, 27 miRNAs belonged to the 31 predicted miRNAs and 12 miRNAs were miRNA*s; another 28 miRNAs were detected only in the microarray assay using probes designed to detect known miRNA from other species. We used these 28 miRNA sequences as query sequences to perform BLAST searches against the B. mori genome. Seven of these sequences were identified in the B. mori genome and their precursor sequences could be folded into hairpin structures and, as such, these seven sequences were likely to be B. mori miRNAs. We designated these sequences bmo-miR-13a*, bmo-miR-14, bmo-miR-46, bmo-miR-46*, bmo-miR-71, bmo-miR-277 and bmo-bantam. Although bmo-miR-13a was one of the 31 miRNAs that were predicted, it was not detected by microarray assay, but its opposite-strand miRNA, named bmo-miR-13a*, was detected. The remaining 21 miRNAs were detected by microarray assay, but were not found in the available B. mori genome (possibly because sequencing of the B. mori genome is incomplete). We considered these 21 miRNAs to be plausible B. mori miRNAs. A novel small RNA was found using a probe designed to detect the known miRNA aga-miR-100. This small RNA was detected by microarray and Northern blotting (Figure (Figure3A)3A) and was identified in the B. mori genome, but its precursor sequence failed to fold into a hairpin structure. This novel small RNA was designated bmo-miR-100-like.

Figure 1
miRNA chip hybridization in B. mori pupa and moth.
Figure 2
Signal strength of detected miRNAs by microarray assay in B. mori pupa and moth. a. all detected miRNAs; b. removed redundant miRNAs; c. B. mori miRNAs. N depicts the signal strength of detected miRNAs.
Figure 3
Identification of miRNAs by Northern blotting using DNA probes complementary to the miRNA sequences. (A). Northern blotting analysis of the miRNAs that belong to the group of 46 miRNAs identified by microarray assay, including the novel small RNA bmo-miR-100-like ...

In conclusion, combining computational predictions with microarray assays, we identified 46 B. mori miRNAs, 13 of which were miRNA*s. We identified a novel small RNA and 21 plausible B. mori miRNAs that could not be found in the available B. mori genome, but which was detected by microarray. Detailed information for these 46 miRNAs and the novel small RNA are listed in Table Table1.1. The 21 plausible B. mori miRNAs are listed in Table Table11 of Additional file 1.

Identification and determination of development-specific expression patterns of B. mori miRNAs by Northern blotting

Northern blotting was done based on microarray assay results to confirm the expression of B. mori miRNAs. Expression of the 46 identified miRNAs, the novel small RNA, and another 21 plausible miRNAs was investigated by Northern blotting of small-sized RNAs isolated from the larva, pupa, and moth stages of B. mori. Twenty-six miRNAs were stably expressed in B. mori in at least one developmental stage (Figure (Figure3).3). Of these 26 miRNAs, 18 belong to the group of 46 miRNAs identified by microarray assay (Figure (Figure3A)3A) and 7 belong to the group of 21 plausible B. mori miRNAs (Figure (Figure3B);3B); the novel small RNA bmo-miR-100-like is shown in Figure Figure3A3A.

Development-specific expression patterns for some B. mori miRNAs were determined by Northern blotting. Some B. mori miRNA genes were expressed only in certain stages (Figure (Figure3).3). bmo-miR-1, bmo-let-7a, bmo-miR-8, bmo-miR-14, bmo-miR-276a, bmo-miR-279 were strongly expressed in all developmental stages (larva, pupa and moth). They were uniformly expressed, suggesting that these miRNAs may play an important role in the regulation of some constitutive process in B. mori. Of these miRNAs, bmo-miR-8 has an opposite-strand miRNA, bmo-miR-8*, which was detected by Northern blotting (Figure (Figure3A)3A) at very low levels in larva, pupa and moth. bmo-let-7b, bmo-let-7c, bmo-miR-9, bmo-miR-9*, bmo-miR-100-like, bmo-miR-263a, bmo-miR-31 and bmo-bantam were expressed in larva and pupa, but were not detected in moth; of these miRNAs, bmo-miR-9 and bmo-miR-9* are also complementary miRNAs. bmo-miR-281a, bmo-miR-281a*, bmo-miR-281b*, bmo-miR-13b and bmo-miR-2b were expressed most strongly in larva, although they were also expressed in pupa and moth. bmo-mri-2a, bmo-miR-100, bmo-miR-276b and bmo-let-7d were also expressed in larva, pupa and moth; bmo-mri-2a and bmo-miR-100 were expressed most strongly in pupa; bmo-miR-276b was expressed most strongly in moth; bmo-let-7d was expressed most weakly in moth. bmo-miR-277 was expressed only in moth and not detected in larva and pupa; the precursor of bmo-miR-277 was also detected [see Figure S1 of Additional file 1]. Similarly, bmo-miR-289 was expressed weakly only in pupa and was not detected in larva and moth. Expression of a miRNA in a specific developmental stage may suggest a role for it in the developmental process.

Computational prediction of B. mori miRNA targets

In the TarBase database, there are 23 miRNAs that regulate 34 targeted genes in D. elanogaster. miRNA functions could be evolutionally conserved between species such as B. mori and D. melanogaster [38]. To deduce the function of B. mori miRNAs, we searched for targeted genes of their orthologous miRNAs reported in D. melanogaster in the TarBase database [39]. In the 46 B. mori miRNAs identified, we found 11 miRNAs, belonging to 8 miRNA families; Drosophila orthologs of these 11 miRNAs have been reported in TarBase and are known to regulate the expression of at least 25 genes. These 11 miRNAs may regulate 13 B. mori orthologs of the 25 Drosophila miRNA-targeted genes according to binding [see Additional file 2]. Bmo-miR-133 may regulate two B. mori orthologs of Mus musculus miRNA targeted genes, SRF and Ptbp2 because of the perfect binding between miRNAs and the complementary sites. GO analysis showed that "nucleus" was over-represented for Drosophila orthologs of the 13 potential targeted genes.

We calculated the potential binding sites between miRNAs and the 3'UTR of mRNAs to determine the potential miRNA targeted genes more globally. With settings hybrid11 and hybridf22 described in Materials and Methods, we obtained 465 and 262 targeted genes, respectively. One hundred and eighty genes were involved in the two settings simultaneously. Removing redundancy, 547 targeted genes including 986 target sites were predicted. Of these binding sites, 338 had perfect base pairing to the seed region of 43 miRNAs. Of the 46 identified miRNAs, bmo-miR-279 was the only one for which we failed to find target sites. Certain miRNAs may have more than one target, and some predicted targets may be regulated by more than one miRNA [see Additional file 3 and Table Table1].1]. Additionally, we found 61 3'UTRs that each contain multiple potential binding sites to a single miRNA [see Additional file 3]; these miRNA-mRNA duplexes showed higher specificity than others. Grun et al. (2005) predicted that at least15% of D. melanogaster genes were regulated by at least one known miRNA [38]. Using settings hybrid11 (hybridf22), we found that 28% (16%) of annotated 1671 3'UTR sequences (corresponding to 1671 genes) had at least one binding site to miRNAs identified in this study. Compared with hybrid11, hybridf22 showed a significantly higher specificity. Biological classification of predicted miRNA targets was done by GO analysis to obtain insight into the function of B. mori miRNAs. GO analysis was completed by submitting gene sequences online (see Materials and Methods). In the predicted targets with settings hybrid11 (hybridf22), 360 (214) genes were assigned to the GO terms of "molecular function" ontology by BLAST, "binding" and "catalytic activity" of which over-represented for the 360 (214) genes; in the "biological process" ontology, "physiological process" over-represented among the 277(184) genes which were predicted with setting hybrid11 (hybridf22) and assigned to GO terms by BLAST [see Additional file 3].

Discussion

We identified 46 miRNAs from B. mori using computational analyses and microarray assays. Of these 46 putative miRNAs, 18 were also confirmed by Northern blotting (Figure (Figure3);3); although the remaining miRNAs were not detected by Northern blotting, they were considered to be miRNAs because they were detected by microarray and their precursors could adopt a hairpin structure. The reason why some miRNAs could not be detected by Northern blotting may be due to expression below the detection limit, or the very narrow temporal expression window for these miRNAs.

Methylated RNA probes have been employed by some research groups for RNA detection [40-42]. We found that methylation of the DNA probe used to detect miRNA by Northern blotting could increase sensitivity. Using methylated DNA probes, signal strength was significantly improved in Northern blots for bmo-miR-14 and bmo-miR-8*, which could not be detected using non-methylated DNA probes [see Figure S2 of Additional file 1]. Improvement may be due to the effect of methylation on base pairing of the probe with the target, or on the secondary structure of the probe.

Analysis of B. mori miRNAs clusters

miRNA clusters have been reported in many species. A cluster usually contains two or three miRNA genes, although larger clusters have also been identified, such as the six-member hsa-miR-17 cluster [7,43,44] or the D. melanogaster cluster containing eight miRNA genes [45]. Clustered miRNA genes can share a high degree of similarity in nucleotide composition, but occasionally the miRNA sequences differ significantly [30,46]. Expression profiles for clustered genes are also very similar, raising the possibility that transcription of these miRNAs is controlled by a common regulatory element [47]. Examining the positions of the identified miRNAs in the B. mori genome, we identified two miRNA clusters (Figure (Figure4):4): bmo-miR-2a-1/bmo-miR-2a-1*/bmo-miR-2a-2/bmo-miR-2b/bmo-miR-13a*/bmo-miR-13b; and bmo-miR-275/bmo-miR-305/bmo-miR-305*. The lengths of the two cluster sequences were 498 and 208 bp, respectively. Genes in the cluster containing bmo-miR-2a-1/bmo-miR-2a-1*/bmo-miR-2a-2/bmo-miR-2b/bmo-miR-13a*/bmo-miR-13b are members of the mir-2 miRNA family. This cluster contains bmo-miR-2a, which can be derived from two different precursor miRNAs transcribed from two paralogous miRNA genes, bmo-miR-2a-1 and bmo-miR-2a-2. The opposite strand to bmo-miR-2a-1 also encodes a miRNA. Searching miRBase, we found that the bmo-miR-2a sequence was identical to the dme-miR-2a, dps-miR-2a, ame-miR-2, and aga-miR-2 sequences, but we failed to identify any other miRNA that had the same sequence as bmo-miR-2b (Figure (Figure5);5); therefore, bmo-miR-2b is a newly identified member of the mir-2 miRNA family. Searching the D. melanogaster and A. gambiae miRNAs, we found that corresponding mir-2 and mir-13 family members also assembled into clusters in these two species. mir-2 and mir-13 repress translation of the target genes, grim, skl and rpr, suggesting that they may be involved in regulating apoptosis [48]. The cluster bmo-miR-275/bmo-miR-305/bmo-miR-305* is also found in D. melanogaster, D. pseudoobscura and A. gambiae. bmo-miR-275 and bmo-miR-305 belong to different miRNA families, mir-275 and mir-305. The functions of these two miRNA families remain unknown.

Figure 4
Secondary structures of miRNA clusters. a. bmo-miR-2a-1/bmo-miR-2a-1*/bmo-miR-2a-2/bmo-miR-2b/bmo-miR-13a*/bmo-miR-13b; b. bmo-miR-275/bmo-miR-305/bmo-miR-305*.
Figure 5
Homologous analysis of mir-2 family.bmo-miR-2b is considered to be a new member of the mir-2 family. (A), Multi-alignment of mir-2 family miRNAs. (B), Hairpin structure of the precursor of bmo-miR-2b.

Analysis of B. mori miRNAs

The identified 46 B. mori miRNAs belonged to 29 miRNA families based on sequence similarity (Table (Table2).2). Among the 46 identified miRNAs, we found 12 pairs of miRNAs and miRNA*s. Scanning miRBase, we determined that seven of these 12 miRNA*s had not been reported. These newly identified miRNAs are bmo-miR-2a*, bmo-miR-8*, bmo-miR-13a*, bmo-miR-46*, bmo-miR-263*, bmo-miR-279*, and bmo-miR-305*.

Table 2
Comparisons of sequence similarity between B. mori miRNAs and corresponding miRNA family members

Observing the orthologous miRNA genes for each family in miRBase, we found that 15 of the 29 families are exclusive to Arthropoda; the other 12 families are found in many species, including five species of Arthropoda. miRNAs having the most orthologs are mir-133 and mir-9, which are found in 25 and 23 animal species, including D. melanogaster and C. elegans.

We determined the number of orthologous and paralogous genes for each detected miRNA. The let-7 miRNA family contains the most members; 77 let-7 family members were identified in miRBase [see Figure S3 of Additional file 1].

Analysis of B. mori precursor miRNA sequences

Variations in pre-miRNA sequences are related to their evolutionary history [22], so we compared the sequences of B. mori pre-miRNAs and members of the same family of pre-miRNAs in the miRBase database (Table (Table2).2). The number of the pre-miRNAs is greater than the number of mature miRNAs because mature miRNAs can be derived from two or more pre-miRNAs. This is consistent with the literature: mature miRNAs are conserved, but pre-miRNAs are diverse [23].

Members of the bantam, mir-71, mir-275, mir-277, mir-279 miRNA families have a high degree of similarity in their precursor sequences. bmo-miR-279 and other mir-279 precursor sequences have sequence similarities of >55%; bmo-miR-277 precursors share >56% sequence similarity; bmo-miR-27 precursors share >57% sequence similarity; bmo-miR-71 precursors share >59% sequence similarity; and bmo-bantam precursors share >60% sequence similarity.

Based on the results of our sequence comparisons, we determined the phylogenetic tree for each miRNA family using the DNAStar MegAlign program to analyze evolutionary relationships between miRNA members from each family. Many of the B. mori miRNA families were found only in Arthropoda; their mature and pre-miRNAs are highly conserved. For these miRNAs, we found that these B. mori miRNAs have close evolutionary relationships with A. mellifera, and A. gambiae miRNAs. We found that these B. mori miRNAs are located on the same branches of the phylogenetic tree as related miRNAs from D. melanogaster, D. pseudoobscura, A. mellifera, and A. gambiae. The phylogenetic tree for the mir-1 and mir-184 miRNA family is shown in Figure Figure6;6; other detailed results are listed in Additional file 4.

Figure 6
Phylogenetic tree of the mir-1 family and the mir-184 family.

We compared the hairpin structures of B. mori miRNA precursor sequences to those of related D. melanogaster, D. pseudoobscura, A. mellifera, and A. gambiae miRNA precursor sequences. Conserved regions of the precursors are found in two arms of the stem-loop structure. The results of comparisons between the hairpin structures of bmo-miR-1, aga-miR-1, ame-miR-1, dme-miR-1 and dps-miR-1 precursors are shown in Figure Figure7.7. Additional file 5 shows the secondary structures of B. mori miRNAs. These results strongly indicate that the identified 46 B. mori sequences are miRNAs.

Figure 7
Comparison of the secondary structures of bmo-miR-1, aga-miR-1, ame-miR-1, dme-miR-1 and dps-miR-1.

Computational prediction of B. mori miRNA targets

MiRNA can regulate the protein expression of genes based on the level of complementarity between miRNA seed sequences and binding sites on target mRNA [49-51]. For animals, the seed sequences of miRNA can bind to complementary sites on 3'UTR of its targeted gene. Complementary sites in targeted genes and seed sequences of miRNAs may be conserved in various species; this may result in the functional conservation of miRNAs, and the orthologous miRNAs may regulate orthologs of the targeted genes. The prediction for miRNA targeted genes according to functional conservation may offer additional insights into the function of miRNAs. Grun et al. (2005) computed the conserved regulatory microRNA-mRNA relationships [38]. They found that 50 unique gene pairs were predicted to be targeted by homologous microRNAs, including 60 microRNA-mRNA regulatory relationships [38]. Weaver et al. (2007) demonstrated that some microRNAs function in the same or similar way in Drosophila and bee (e.g., mir-9a may control sensory organ precursors (SOPs) between Drosophila and bee) [52]. Functional prediction based on cross-species conservation may provide a reference for studying on the functions of B. mori miRNAs. Based on this method, we identified 12 miRNAs that regulate 15 potential targeted genes [see Additional file 2]. Most Drosophila orthologs of these potential targeted genes were the vital genes for development, including transcriptional regulator, apoptosis-related genes and genes involved in signal transduction pathways. mir-2 controls HLHmdelta, and mir-7 controls HLHm3, HLHm5, HLHmgamma, M4 and TOM, in D. melanogaster; these six genes are involved in the Notch signaling pathway. B. mori homologs [GenBank: Bmo.1984 and Bmo.4220] of these six genes can bind perfectly to mir-2 (bmo-miR-2a, bmo-miR-2b, bmo-miR-13a* and bmo-miR-13b) and bmo-miR-7, respectively. mir-2 and mir-7 may be related to the Notch signaling pathway in B. mori; this hypothesis is consistent with previous predictions [38,53]. Cross-species comparisons allow for the identification of evolutionarily conserved and probable functional target sites. The 12 miRNAs could play parts in the development of B. mori by regulating their targeted genes, including the 15 potential targeted genes identified in this study.

We predicted many miRNA targeted genes by calculating target sites. Interestingly, we have studied B. mori profilin gene [GenBank: EF112402]; there was not a linear relationship between the transcription level of this gene and protein expression (data not shown). The long 3'UTR of this gene was found to have nine potential binding sites [see Additional file 3]. Profilin plays an important part in biologically active cellular compartments [54]. It regulates the polymerization, depolymerization, and dynamics of actin, which are important for determining cell shape and movement through the cytoplasm [54].

We can predict miRNA targets specifically according to the level of complementarity between the seed region of miRNA and 3'UTR of mRNA [49]. We set stringent settings for base pairing of binding sites (see Materials and Methods) based on this knowledge. Applying these settings, many targets predicted by functional conservation, such as B. mori homologs of HLHmdelta and M4, would not have been predicted because of stringent filtering of the settings for miRNA-mRNA duplexes. However, using the settings, the predicted binding sites of targets can bind perfectly to miRNA, and the target sites belong mainly to the three categories of known miRNA target sites classified by Sethupathy et al. (2006)[49] [see Additional file 3]. Nevertheless, we identified too many potential binding sites to test experimentally. According to a previous suggestion [49], genes with multiple predicted target sites (61 genes here accounting for 11% of all predicted targets) should be considered strong candidates for future functional studies.

Conclusion

We identified 46 B. mori miRNAs, 13 of which were miRNA*s, by combining computational predictions with microarray assays. We identified a novel small RNA and 21 plausible B. mori miRNAs that could not be found in the available B. mori genome, but which were detected by microarray. The small novel RNA, bmo-miR-100-like, was identified using the known miRNA aga-miR-100 as a probe; it was detected by microarray assay and Northern blotting, but its precursor sequences failed to fold into a hairpin structure. Northern blotting revealed that some B. mori miRNA genes were expressed only during specific stages, indicating that B. mori miRNA genes have developmentally regulated expression patterns. For example, bmo-miR-277 was expressed only during the moth stage. We identified two miRNA gene clusters in the B. mori genome, and bmo-miR-2b was identified as a new member of the mir-2 family. We found that methylation of the DNA probe used to detect the miRNA by Northern blotting may increase its sensitivity. According to functional conservation in various species, we predicted that 11 miRNAs may regulate 13 B. mori orthologs of the 25 known Drosophila miRNA-targeted genes. A total of 547 targeted genes were predicted from 1671 B. mori genes according to the target sites predicted by settings hybrid11 and hybridf22. From the predicted genes, 61 genes each contained multiple predicted target sites and could be candidates for the functional study of miRNA. Three GO terms, "binding", "catalytic activity" and "physiological process", were over-represented for the predicted genes.

Identification of putative miRNAs in other organisms is a worthwhile approach for increasing the understanding of the roles of miRNA. Identification of miRNAs in B. mori may help to elucidate the mechanisms underlying simple and complex regulation of the 42-day lifecycle of B. mori, which consists of six periods of ecdysis and four periods of metamorphosis.

Methods

miRNA reference sets and the B. mori genome

Prediction and identification of miRNAs in B. mori is shown in Figure Figure8.8. We downloaded 78 miRNAs from D. melanogaster, 73 from D. pseudoobscura, 25 from A. mellifera, 38 from A. gambiae, and their precursor sequences from MicroRNA Registry release 7.1 [21,22,55]. These sequences were used as a reference set to predict miRNA in B. mori. Genomic sequences for B. mori were downloaded from the Beijing Genomics Institute [25,26,56]. The total size of B. mori genome is 428.7 Mb, containing 23,156 scaffolds and 66,482 contigs.

Figure 8
Predictions and microarray assays for miRNA in B. mori.

Prediction of B. mori miRNAs by homology search

We used the sequences of known miRNAs (vide supra) and pre-miRNAs in the reference set as query sequences for BLAST searches against the B. mori genome; we used a word size of seven and an E-value cutoff of ten.

Four criteria were used to predict B. mori miRNAs and pre-miRNAs according to BLAST search results: (1) there was >80% similarity between each potential B. mori miRNA and the corresponding miRNA in the reference set; (2) the difference in the lengths between each potential B. mori pre-miRNA and the corresponding pre-miRNA in reference set was <5-nt, and the corresponding positions of the mature miRNAs in their pre-miRNAs were nearly identical; (3) the lowest free energy for folding of the secondary structures for each potential B. mori pre-miRNA, as predicted by the mfold program [37], was less than -20 kcal/mol; and (4) the secondary structures of the predicted pre-miRNA satisfied the requirements set out in reference [23], i.e., a potential fold-back precursor structure must contain the ~22-nt miRNA sequence within one arm of the hairpin, and the hairpin must include at least 16 bp within the first 22 nt of the miRNA. The structure should not contain large internal loops or bulges, particularly not large asymmetric bulges (<5-nt).

Paraflo™ miRNA microarray assay

Based on the predicted results and the sequences of known miRNAs in Arthropoda, Nematoda, and human, we designed probes to detect B. mori miRNAs in B. mori pupa and moth stages by microarray profiling.

Microarray assays were done using a service provider (LC Sciences, Houston, USA). The assay was done on 5-μg total RNA samples from B. mori pupa (labeled cy3) and moth (labeled cy5), which were size fractionated using a mirVana Isolation kit (Ambion, Austin, USA); the small RNAs (<200 nt) were 3'-extended with a poly(A) tail using poly(A) polymerase. An oligonucleotide tag was then ligated to the poly(A) tail for later staining with fluorescent dye; two different tags were used for the two RNA samples in dual-sample experiments. Hybridization was done overnight on a μParaFlo microfluidic chip using a micro-circulation pump (Atactic Technologies, Houston, USA) [57]. On the microfluidic chip, each detection probe consisted of a chemically modified nucleotide coding segment complementary to the target miRNA (miRBase, http://microrna.sanger.ac.uk/sequences/) or other RNA (control or our defined sequences) and a spacer segment of polyethylene glycol to extend the coding segment away from the substrate. Detection probes were made by in situ synthesis using photogenerated reagent (PGR) chemistry. The hybridization melting temperatures were balanced by chemical modifications of the detection probes. Hybridizations used 100 L 6 × SSPE buffer (0.90 M NaCl, 60 mM Na2HPO4, 6 mM EDTA, pH 6.8) containing 25% formamide at 34°C. After hybridization, signals were detected using fluorescence labeling with tag-specfic Cy5 (for B. mori pupa and moth) dyes (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, USA). Hybridization images were collected using a laser scanner (GenePix 4000B, Molecular Device, Sunnyvale, USA) and quantified. Data were analyzed by first subtracting the background, and then normalized using a cyclic LOWESS filter (locally-weighted regression) [58]. For two color experiments, the ratio of the two sets of detected signals (log2 transformed, balanced) and p-values of the t-test were calculated; differentially detected signals were those with p-values of < 0.01. Data classification involved a hierarchical clustering method using average linkage and Euclidean distance metric, and was visualized with TIGR's MeV (Multiple Experimental Viewer; Institute for Genomic Research).

Northern blotting

Total small RNA was isolated from the larva, pupa, and moth stages of the silkworm using mirVana™ miRNA Isolation Kit (Ambion) according to manufacturer instructions. Liquid nitrogen was used to freeze samples before RNA extraction. Small RNA was quantified by spectrophotometer (NanoDrop, Wilmington, USA). Twenty micrograms of small RNA was loaded per lane, and resolved on a denaturing 15% polyacrylamide gel containing 8 M urea at 20 mA; small RNA was transferred by electrophoresis from the gel to a positively charged nylon membrane (Millipore, Shanghai, China) by a semi-dry transfer apparatus (ATTA) at 200 mA for 2 h. After electroblotting, membranes were ultraviolet crosslinked (120 mJ, 30 s) and baked for 1 h at 80°C. DNA probes complementary to small RNA sequences were 5' end-labeled with γ-32P-ATP using a 5' DNA Labeling Kit (Shenergy Biocolor, Shanghai, China). The membrane was prehybridized in prehybridization solution (6 × SSC, 10 × Denhardt's solution, 0.2% SDS) at 64°C for 1 h. Membranes were hybridized in hybridization solution (6 × SSC, 5 × Denhardt's solution, 0.2% SDS) containing 1–5 × 106 cpm 5' end-labeled antisense probes for 18–24 h with gentle agitation at 28°C. Blots were washed three times for 5 min each at 28°C with 6 × SSC and 0.2% SDS, and once at 42°C for 10 min. After the final wash, blots were wrapped in plastic wrap and exposed to a phosphorimager screen (Amersham, Piscataway, USA) according to manufacturer instructions.

Computational prediction of miRNA targets

Functions of the identified B. mori miRNAs were analyzed according to the functional conservation and the potential binding sites between miRNAs and the 3'UTR of responding mRNAs.

Based on the Tarbase database [59], we searched for the known targeted genes of Drosophila orthologs of identified miRNAs. Their B. mori homologs and their 3'UTR were subsequently obtained by the BLAST program. The B. mori miRNA targeted genes were predicted according to the binding between miRNAs and their complementary sites on the 3'UTR of the B. mori homologs by the RNAhybrid program [60].

In general, base pairing between miRNA and the complementary site on mRNA may provide a function prediction for miRNA. We calculated the potential binding sites between identified miRNAs and the 3'UTR of mRNAs of B. mori genes using the RNAhybrid program [60]; we used two settings to obtain specific binding sites. The first setting (P-value cutoff of 0.05, minimum free energy cutoff of -20.0 kcal/mol, maximum internal and bulge loop size of 1) was termed "hybrid11"; if maximum internal and bulge loop size was 2 but the seed region of miRNA could perfectly bind to 3'UTR of a gene (helix constraint of 2.7), we also considered this gene to be a potential miRNA-targeted gene (this setting was termed "hybridf22"). The functional annotation for predicted targeted genes were analyzed using Gene Ontology analysis [61]. B. mori genes were obtained from B. mori Genes Database constructed by us, and which includes 1909 genes. From these genes, 1671 3'UTRs were obtained and used for predicting potential targeted genes.

Authors' contributions

PAH carried out the prediction and analysis of the miRNA and drafted the manuscript. ZMN performed the experiments, and carried out the analysis of miRNA and drafted the manuscript. JQC, JC, ZBL, QS and LYK performed the experiments. SPZ and XLG helped to analyze the data and draft the manuscript. XFW directed all the work of the manuscript. YFJ and YZZ conceived, and carried out the design and draft of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Supplementary Material

Additional file 1:

Northern blotting analysis of B. mori miRNAs. The data provided show the results of Northern blotting analysis for miRNAs. One table and three figures are in the file. The table shows the 21 plausible miRNAs identified by Northern blotting. Figure Figure11 displayed the result of Northern blotting analysis for bmo-miR-277. Figure Figure22 shows improvement of the detectable level of miRNA using methylated probes. Figure Figure33 shows the multi-alignment of the members of miRNA let-7 family.

Additional file 2:

Functional analysis of miRNAs in B. mori according to functional conservation between silkworm and fruit fly. The data provided show the detailed information regarding predicting targets of miRNAs in B. mori. Targets were predicted according to the binding between miRNAs and B. mori orthologs of known miRNA targets of fruit fly.

Additional file 3:

Functional analysis of miRNAs in B. mori according to binding sites between miRNAs and mRNAs. The data provided show the detailed information for miRNA-targeted genes predicted according to binding sites on 3'UTR of mRNAs. There are six sheets in the EXCEL file, including hybrid11, hybridf22, combination with no redundancy, statistics of binding sites, Go analysis, and binding sites of profilin. Sheet hybrid11 shows detailed information of predicted target genes using setting hybrid11; sheet hybridf22 shows detailed information of predicted target genes using setting hybridf22; sheet 3, named "combination with no redundancy", shows the results for the sheet hybrid11 and hybridf22 after removing redundancy; sheet 4, named "statistics of binding sites", shows the results of statistic analysis for all genes that were found to have more than one binding site; sheet 5, named "Go analysis", shows the results of Go analysis of predicted targeted genes; and sheet 6, named "binding sites of profilin", shows information of the potential binding sites between the B. mori profilin gene and miRNAs.

Additional file 4:

Phylogeny trees for each of miRNA families. The data provided show the phylogeny trees for each of miRNA families in B. mori.

Additional file 5:

Detailed information of all the 46 identified miRNAs in B. mori. The data provided show the detailed information of all the 46 identified miRNAs in B. mori, including sequences of the pre-miRNA and mature miRNA, the complementary region of miRNAs, the secondary structure of pre-miRNA, and the minimum energy.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by financial grants from the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program, No.2005CB121006), the National High Technology Research and Development Program (No. 2007AA021703), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.30740015, No.30670447) and the Zhejiang Natural Science Foundation (No. Y205449, Y304122). We thank International Science Editing for English editing.

References

  • Ambros V. MicroRNA pathways in flies and worms: growth, death, fat, stress, and timing. Cell. 2003;113:673–676. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00428-8. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Ambros V. The functions of animal microRNAs. Nature. 2004;431:350–355. doi: 10.1038/nature02871. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Lim LP, Lau NC, Weinstein EG, Abdelhakim A, Yekta S, Rhoades MW, Burge CB, Bartel DP. The microRNAs of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genes Dev. 2003;17:991–1008. doi: 10.1101/gad.1074403. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Carrington JC, Ambros V. Role of microRNAs in plant and animal development. Science. 2003;301:336–338. doi: 10.1126/science.1085242. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Lee RC, Feinbaum RL, Ambros V. The C. elegans heterochronic gene lin-4 encodes small RNAs with antisense complementarity to lin-14. Cell. 1993;75:843–854. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90529-Y. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Reinhart BJ, Slack FJ, Basson M, Pasquinelli AE, Bettinger JC, Rougvie AE, Horvitz HR, Ruvkun G. The 21-nucleotide let-7 RNA regulates developmental timing in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature. 2000;403:901–906. doi: 10.1038/35002607. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Lagos-Quintana M, Rauhut R, Lendeckel W, Tuschl T. Identification of novel genes coding for small expressed RNAs. Science. 2001;294:853–858. doi: 10.1126/science.1064921. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Lau NC, Lim LP, Weinstein EG, Bartel DP. An abundant class of tiny RNAs with probable regulatory roles in Caenorhabditis elegans. Science. 2001;294:858–862. doi: 10.1126/science.1065062. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Lee RC, Ambros V. An extensive class of small RNAs in Caenorhabditis elegans. Science. 2001;294:862–864. doi: 10.1126/science.1065329. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Grad Y, Aach J, Hayes GD, Reinhart BJ, Church GM, Ruvkun G, Kim J. Computational and experimental identification of C. elegans microRNAs. Mol Cell. 2003;11:1253–1263. doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00153-9. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Lai EC, Tomancak P, Williams RW, Rubin GM. Computational identification of Drosophila microRNA genes. Genome Biol. 2003;4:R42. doi: 10.1186/gb-2003-4-7-r42. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Wang XJ, Reyes JL, Chua NH, Gaasterland T. Prediction and identification of Arabidopsis thaliana microRNAs and their mRNA targets. Genome Biol. 2004;5:R65. doi: 10.1186/gb-2004-5-9-r65. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Jones-Rhoades MW, Bartel DP. Computational identification of plant microRNAs and their targets, including a stress-induced miRNA. Mol Cell. 2004;14:787–799. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2004.05.027. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Bonnet E, Wuyts J, Rouze P, Peer Y Van de. Evidence that microRNA precursors, unlike other non-coding RNAs, have lower folding free energies than random sequences. Bioinformatics. 2004;20:2911–2917. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth374. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Yoon S, De Micheli G. Prediction of regulatory modules comprising microRNAs and target genes. Bioinformatics. 2005;21:ii93–100. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti1116. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Wang X, Zhang J, Li F, Gu J, He T, Zhang X, Li Y. MicroRNA identification based on sequence and structure alignment. Bioinformatics. 2005;21:3610–3614. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti562. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Nam JW, Shin KR, Han J, Lee Y, Kim VN, Zhang BT. Human microRNA prediction through a probabilistic co-learning model of sequence and structure. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:3570–3581. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki668. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Dezulian T, Remmert M, Palatnik JF, Weigel D, Huson DH. Identification of plant microRNA homologs. Bioinformatics. 2006;22:359–360. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti802. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Tong CZ, Jin YF, Zhang YZ. Computational prediction of microRNA genes in silkworm genome. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2006;7:806–816. doi: 10.1631/jzus.2006.B0806. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Helvik SA, Snove O, Jr, Saetrom P. Reliable prediction of Drosha processing sites improves microRNA gene prediction. Bioinformatics. 2007;23:142–149. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl570. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Griffiths-Jones S, Grocock RJ, van Dongen S, Bateman A, Enright AJ. miRBase: microRNA sequences, targets and gene nomenclature. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006:D140–144. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkj112. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Griffiths-Jones S. The microRNA Registry. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004:D109–111. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh023. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Ambros V, Bartel B, Bartel DP, Burge CB, Carrington JC, Chen X, Dreyfuss G, Eddy SR, Griffiths-Jones S, Marshall M, et al. A uniform system for microRNA annotation. RNA. 2003;9:277–279. doi: 10.1261/rna.2183803. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Arteaga-Vazquez M, Caballero-Perez J, Vielle-Calzada JP. A family of microRNAs present in plants and animals. Plant Cell. 2006;18:3355–3369. doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.044420. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Xia Q, Zhou Z, Lu C, Cheng D, Dai F, Li B, Zhao P, Zha X, Cheng T, Chai C, et al. A draft sequence for the genome of the domesticated silkworm (Bombyx mori) Science. 2004;306:1937–1940. doi: 10.1126/science.1102210. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Wang J, Xia Q, He X, Dai M, Ruan J, Chen J, Yu G, Yuan H, Hu Y, Li R, et al. SilkDB: a knowledgebase for silkworm biology and genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005:D399–402. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Schwarz DS, Hutvagner G, Du T, Xu Z, Aronin N, Zamore PD. Asymmetry in the assembly of the RNAi enzyme complex. Cell. 2003;115:199–208. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00759-1. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Gregory RI, Chendrimada TP, Cooch N, Shiekhattar R. Human RISC couples microRNA biogenesis and posttranscriptional gene silencing. Cell. 2005;123:631–640. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.10.022. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Velkey JM, Slawny NA, Gratsch TE, O'Shea KS. Gene silencing using RNA interference in embryonic stem cells. Methods Mol Biol. 2006;329:233–261. [PubMed]
  • Bartel DP. MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell. 2004;116:281–297. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00045-5. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Rana TM. Illuminating the silence: understanding the structure and function of small RNAs. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007;8:23–36. doi: 10.1038/nrm2085. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Zhang B, Wang Q, Pan X. MicroRNAs and their regulatory roles in animals and plants. J Cell Physiol. 2007;210:279–289. doi: 10.1002/jcp.20869. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Behura SK. Insect microRNAs: Structure, function and evolution. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2007;37:3–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2006.10.006. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Denli AM, Tops BB, Plasterk RH, Ketting RF, Hannon GJ. Processing of primary microRNAs by the Microprocessor complex. Nature. 2004;432:231–235. doi: 10.1038/nature03049. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Kloosterman WP, Wienholds E, Ketting RF, Plasterk RH. Substrate requirements for let-7 function in the developing zebrafish embryo. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:6284–6291. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh968. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Liu S, Xia Q, Zhao P, Cheng T, Hong K, Xiang Z. Characterization and expression patterns of let-7 microRNA in the silkworm (Bombyx mori) BMC Dev Biol. 2007;7:88. doi: 10.1186/1471-213X-7-88. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Zuker M. Mfold web server for nucleic acid folding and hybridization prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31:3406–3415. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg595. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Grun D, Wang YL, Langenberger D, Gunsalus KC, Rajewsky N. microRNA target predictions across seven Drosophila species and comparison to mammalian targets. PLoS Comput Biol. 2005;1:e13. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0010013. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Sethupathy P, Corda B, Hatzigeorgiou AG. TarBase: A comprehensive database of experimentally supported animal microRNA targets. RNA. 2006;12:192–197. doi: 10.1261/rna.2239606. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Roder K, Hung MS, Lee TL, Lin TY, Xiao H, Isobe KI, Juang JL, Shen CJ. Transcriptional repression by Drosophila methyl-CpG-binding proteins. Mol Cell Biol. 2000;20:7401–7409. doi: 10.1128/MCB.20.19.7401-7409.2000. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Guimaraes-Sternberg C, Meerson A, Shaked I, Soreq H. MicroRNA modulation of megakaryoblast fate involves cholinergic signaling. Leuk Res. 2006;30:583–595. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2005.09.005. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Majlessi M, Nelson NC, Becker MM. Advantages of 2'-O-methyl oligoribonucleotide probes for detecting RNA targets. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998;26:2224–2229. doi: 10.1093/nar/26.9.2224. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Tanzer A, Stadler PF. Molecular evolution of a microRNA cluster. J Mol Biol. 2004;339:327–335. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.03.065. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Aravin AA, Lagos-Quintana M, Yalcin A, Zavolan M, Marks D, Snyder B, Gaasterland T, Meyer J, Tuschl T. The small RNA profile during Drosophila melanogaster development. Dev Cell. 2003;5:337–350. doi: 10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00228-4. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Seitz H, Royo H, Bortolin ML, Lin SP, Ferguson-Smith AC, Cavaille J. A large imprinted microRNA gene cluster at the mouse Dlk1-Gtl2 domain. Genome Res. 2004;14:1741–1748. doi: 10.1101/gr.2743304. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Valencia-Sanchez MA, Liu J, Hannon GJ, Parker R. Control of translation and mRNA degradation by miRNAs and siRNAs. Genes Dev. 2006;20:515–524. doi: 10.1101/gad.1399806. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Lee Y, Jeon K, Lee JT, Kim S, Kim VN. MicroRNA maturation: stepwise processing and subcellular localization. EMBO J. 2002;21:4663–4670. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdf476. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Stark A, Brennecke J, Russell RB, Cohen SM. Identification of Drosophila MicroRNA targets. PLoS Biol. 2003;1:E60. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0000060. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Sethupathy P, Megraw M, Hatzigeorgiou AG. A guide through present computational approaches for the identification of mammalian microRNA targets. Nat Methods. 2006;3:881–886. doi: 10.1038/nmeth954. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Joglekar MV, Parekh VS, Mehta S, Bhonde RR, Hardikar AA. MicroRNA profiling of developing and regenerating pancreas reveal post-transcriptional regulation of neurogenin3. Dev Biol. 2007;311:603–612. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.09.008. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Asangani IA, Rasheed SA, Nikolova DA, Leupold JH, Colburn NH, Post S, Allgayer H. MicroRNA-21 (miR-21) post-transcriptionally downregulates tumor suppressor Pdcd4 and stimulates invasion, intravasation and metastasis in colorectal cancer. Oncogene. 2007. [PubMed]
  • Weaver DB, Anzola JM, Evans JD, Reid JG, Reese JT, Childs KL, Zdobnov EM, Samanta MP, Miller J, Elsik CG. Computational and transcriptional evidence for microRNAs in the honey bee genome. Genome Biol. 2007;8:R97. doi: 10.1186/gb-2007-8-6-r97. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Lai EC. Micro RNAs are complementary to 3' UTR sequence motifs that mediate negative post-transcriptional regulation. Nat Genet. 2002;30:363–364. doi: 10.1038/ng865. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Clarke SR, Staiger CJ, Gibbon BC, Franklin-Tong VE. A potential signaling role for profilin in pollen of Papaver rhoeas. Plant Cell. 1998;10:967–979. doi: 10.1105/tpc.10.6.967. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • miRBase website http://microrna.sanger.ac.uk/sequences/index.shtml
  • Beijing Genomics Institute website http://silkworm.genomics.org.cn/
  • Gao X, Gulari E, Zhou X. In situ synthesis of oligonucleotide microarrays. Biopolymers. 2004;73:579–596. doi: 10.1002/bip.20005. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Bolstad BM, Irizarry RA, Astrand M, Speed TP. A comparison of normalization methods for high density oligonucleotide array data based on variance and bias. Bioinformatics. 2003;19:185–193. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/19.2.185. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Tarbase website http://www.diana.pcbi.upenn.edu/tarbase.html
  • Rehmsmeier M, Steffen P, Hochsmann M, Giegerich R. Fast and effective prediction of microRNA/target duplexes. RNA. 2004;10:1507–1517. doi: 10.1261/rna.5248604. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Gene Ontology analysis website http://goblet.molgen.mpg.de/cgi-bin/goblet/webapp-goblet.cgi?menu=Form

Articles from BMC Genomics are provided here courtesy of BioMed Central
PubReader format: click here to try

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...