![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright Crossman et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. A Common Genomic Framework for a Diverse Assembly of Plasmids in the Symbiotic Nitrogen Fixing Bacteria 1The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, United Kingdom 2Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cuernavaca, México 3John Innes Centre, Norwich, United Kingdom 4Department of Biology, University of York, York, United Kingdom 5School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom 6Department of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada Richard R. Copley, Editor Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, United Kingdom * E-mail: lcc/at/sanger.ac.uk (LCC); Email: vgonzal/at/ccg.unam.mx (VC) Analyzed the data: GV LC JY AW GM JD CM JA ZG IH DR VG SC. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: JP LC ZG VG. Wrote the paper: JP AJ LC GM JD CM MH GD VG. Received February 19, 2008; Accepted May 6, 2008. This article has been corrected. See PLoS ONE. 2008 August 01; 3(8): 10.1371/annotation/4a58a9bd-7531-41d0-b101-53039a88c25b. This article has been corrected. See PLoS ONE. 2008 August 18; 3(8): 10.1371/annotation/8d8e2649-c772-4363-b70b-b242c42f505f.Abstract This work centres on the genomic comparisons of two closely-related nitrogen-fixing symbiotic bacteria, Rhizobium leguminosarum biovar viciae 3841 and Rhizobium etli CFN42. These strains maintain a stable genomic core that is also common to other rhizobia species plus a very variable and significant accessory component. The chromosomes are highly syntenic, whereas plasmids are related by fewer syntenic blocks and have mosaic structures. The pairs of plasmids p42f-pRL12, p42e-pRL11 and p42b-pRL9 as well large parts of p42c with pRL10 are shown to be similar, whereas the symbiotic plasmids (p42d and pRL10) are structurally unrelated and seem to follow distinct evolutionary paths. Even though purifying selection is acting on the whole genome, the accessory component is evolving more rapidly. This component is constituted largely for proteins for transport of diverse metabolites and elements of external origin. The present analysis allows us to conclude that a heterogeneous and quickly diversifying group of plasmids co-exists in a common genomic framework. Introduction Rhizobium etli and Rhizobium leguminosarum bv viciae (henceforth called R. leguminosarum) are closely related species which are able to fix atmospheric nitrogen in symbiosis with specific leguminous plants. The common bean is the natural host of R. etli whereas R. leguminosarum interacts with peas, lentils, vetches and Lathyrus spp. Recently, we reported the complete genome sequences of a strain of R. etli and a strain of R. leguminosarum [1], [2], but no comprehensive genome comparison between these species had been carried out. To date, several other complete genome sequences of symbiotic nitrogen fixing bacteria have been published: Mesorhizobium loti, Bradyrhizobium japonicum, B. spp. ORS278, B. spp. BTAi1 and Sinorhizobium meliloti [3]–[6]). Our comparisons of R. etli and R. leguminosarum show that: 1) Rhizobium genomes are composed of “core” and “accessory” components; 2) the chromosomes are markedly conserved in gene content (despite differences in size) and amongst the closest species gene order is also conserved; 3) the plasmids are heterogeneous in size and gene content and in some cases no synteny can be seen even in comparison with phylogenetic neighbours. Rhizobium field isolates have the unusual feature of harbouring several plasmids, ranging in size from 100 kb to >1,000 kb and the plasmid profiles of a particular isolate can be used to type strains reliably [7]. Since R. etli CFN42 and R. leguminosarum 3841 are the most closely-related rhizobial species yet sequenced and both strains have six large plasmids, a detailed genome comparison between them may help us interpret the evolutionary history of these prototypical accessory elements. Indeed, whole genome comparisons allowed us to discern the distinctive properties of the core genome, and also to highlight the genetic differences between these species. Results Main features of the compared species Both R. etli CFN42 and R. leguminosarum 3841 have large genomes composed of a circular chromosome and six large plasmids [1], [2]. The six CFN42 plasmids, pRetCFN42a-f, will be referred to as p42a-f throughout this article, whilst the six 3841 plasmids (sometimes known as pRL7JI-pRL12JI) are termed pRL7-12. The total size of the R. etli CFN42 genome is 1,221,081 bp shorter than that of R. leguminosarum 3841 (Table S1). The two smaller plasmids of R. etli are substantially larger than the two smallest plasmids of R. leguminosarum, whilst the opposite is the case for the other four plasmids (Table S1). R. leguminosarum plasmids comprise 34.8% of the total genome, whilst R. etli plasmids comprise an equivalent 32.9%. The two smallest R. leguminosarum plasmids are of lower than average GC content, whilst in R. etli the major nitrogen fixation plasmid (pSym; p42d) and the smallest plasmid (p42a) are the only plasmids of significantly lower GC content. The largest plasmids in both genomes resemble their corresponding chromosomes both in GC content and dinucleotide signatures. Symbiotic functions, specified by the nod, nol, nif and fix genes, are mainly encoded by a single plasmid (p42d in R. etli and pRL10 in R. leguminosarum), but other symbiosis-related genes are located on other plasmids and in the chromosome [1], [8]. The R. etli plasmid p42a is transferable at high frequencies and can help the mobilization of p42d [9]–[11] and p42d is also self-transmissible by conjugation [12] although its transfer ability is tightly repressed [13]. In R. leguminosarum, pRL7 and pRL8 are transmissible by conjugation, although neither carries a full set of tra genes [2]. Phylogenomic relatedness between R. etli and R. leguminosarum R. leguminosarum and R. etli are closely related species, judged by 16S rRNA comparisons and other molecular criteria (Figure S1). We first tested the consistency of these traditional phylogenies with genome phylogenies obtained with all individual proteins included in quartops (QUARtet of Orthologous Proteins). To do this, we incorporated two other species of the Rhizobiaceae family, S. meliloti and the non-nitrogen-fixing Agrobacterium tumefaciens, whose complete genomes are also available‥ A total of 33% and 39% of R. leguminosarum and R. etli proteins, respectively, were present in the Quartops; this equates to 2,392 predicted proteins representing core genes that are common to these four organisms (Table 1). Most of these predicted proteins are chromosomally encoded (2,054) but 338 belong to plasmids pRL9, pRL11 and pRL12. Three of the plasmids (pRL7, pRL8 and pRL10) do not have any proteins in Quartops. A total of 2,241 (85% of all proteins included in quartops) supports the phylogenetic relationship that proposes R. leguminosarum and R. etli are the most closely related. However, the high numbers of proteins absent from Quartops suggests that gene losses and gains might significantly have driven the diversification of the fast growing rhizobia. To investigate this area, we clustered all the predicted proteins of R. etli, R. leguminosarum, S. meliloti and A. tumefaciens into families by means of the MCL algorithm [14]. About 28% of the protein families identified (1,965 out 6,827) are shared by the four species, whereas about 10% (668) are only present in three species (Figure 1, bars 1–6
Genome synteny To investigate whether the evolutionary relationship between R. etli and R. leguminosarum is also maintained at the level of gene order, the whole genomes were compared using ACT and Nucmer softwares [15], [16]. A clear syntenic pattern is distinguished between both chromosomes but it is also noticeable for some pairs of plasmids: (p42f-pRL12), (p42e-pRL11) and (p42b-pRL9) as well as large parts of p42c woth pRL10, suggesting a common origin (Figure 2
Core genome composition and evolution R. etli and R. leguminosarum share 5,470 genes with approximately 89–100% similarity (see methods). A significant fraction of these common genes (3,359 or 62%) is solely present in both chromosomes (Chromosomal Only, CHR-O). The rest are situated either in the chromosome or plasmids or exclusively in the plasmids (Non-Chromosomal, N-CHR). Using the Riley classification scheme [20], CHR-O genes are overrepresented in the categories corresponding to small and macromolecule metabolism, structural elements, regulators and hypothetical conserved genes. In contrast, the N-CHR group tends to contain genes implicated in processes like chemotaxis, chaperones, transport, and elements of external origin (Figure 4a
Differences between the CHR-O and the N-CHR gene compartments were also detected in regard to rates of evolution. To do this, we calculated the rates of nucleotide substitution per synonymous (Ks) and non-synonymous sites (Ka), for a subset of 2,917 single copy homologues (see methods; Figure 5
Mosaic replicons Despite the high level of genome conservation, it is reasonable to expect that some degree of intra-genomic recombination has occurred since these two strains R. etli and R. leguminosarum had a common ancestor. This was substantiated by comparing the locations of the N-CHR group of genes in the different replicons of both genomes. Approximately 7% of the chromosomal genes of R. leguminosarum are represented in the plasmids of R. etli, and 10% of the chromosomal genes of R. etli are located in the R. leguminosarum plasmids. As shown before, some pairs of plasmids are likely equivalent in terms of their global similarity, but they are mosaic replicons that contain genes from the other replicons. For instance, pRL12 has significant similarity with p42f, but also possesses genes that in R. etli are chromosomal or on another plasmid (Figure 6
A potential symbiosis cassette A comparison of the major symbiotic plasmids (pSyms) pRL10 and p42d shows that the nif-nod region in pRL10 is compacted into 60 kb, whereas in p42d it encompasses 125 kb. As many as 20 common nod and nif genes have been identified in comparisons among complete sequences of pSyms and symbiotic islands of different rhizobia [8]. The plasmid pRL10 contains 18 of these genes and has a particularly enhanced set of nodulation genes, including genes that lack homologs in R. etli, such as nodTNMLEF and rhiABCR. In contrast, pRL10 has a restricted set of genes for nitrogenase maturation, lacking nifS, nifW, nifZ, nifX, iscN, and nifU, which are present in R. etli and in other rhizobia. Besides the common nodulation genes, the R. etli pSym possesses nolT, nolL, nolR, noeI, noeJ, and a Type III secretion system. The symbiotic genes of R. leguminosarum may have been acquired by horizontal gene transfer, since an in silico analysis of pRL10 with the Alien Hunter program [23] reveals that its symbiotic gene cluster, which includes the nif, nod, rhi and fix genes, is located in a short potentially mobile region of DNA (~63.5 kb). Internal to this region are the nifNEKDH genes that are found bounded by two identical IS element repeat regions. The rhi and nod gene cluster, together with fixABCX, lie adjacent on this potential genomic island and are potentially bounded by 20 bp repeats, whilst the fixNOPQ and fixGHIS genes lie immediately downstream on a separate putative genomic island of approximately 11,000 bp, potentially bounded by 18 bp repeats (Figure 7
Physiological differences The consequences of the evolutionary process of gain and losses are reflected in some physiological differences. For example, no candidate genes for respiratory nitrate reductases have been identified in the R. etli or R. leguminosarum genomes, however, the nirK gene for the respiratory nitrite reductase is present on R. etli p42f (RE1PF0000526). This gene appears to participate in nitrite detoxification [24]. Nitric oxide (NO) removal is encoded by R. etli as a predicted norECBD operon on the p42f plasmid located in proximity to the nirKV and probable regulators. These genes are absent in R. leguminosarum, although there are possible alternative NO consumption systems. One of such pathways encoded chromosomally by both R. etli and R. leguminosarum is via the assimilatory nitrite reductase. Another difference is the presence of erythritol catabolic genes, possibly originating from a horizontal transfer event, on pRL12 [25]. This gene cluster is absent from the CFN42 genome. Since the lifestyles of R. etli and R. leguminosarum bv. viciae are similar, they may have similar responses to environmental stimuli. Thus, they may respond similarly with respect to environmental stimuli. For instance, population-density-dependent gene induction by N-acyl homoserine lactones (AHLs) influence symbiotic functions such as nodulation, nitrogen fixation, and surface polysaccharide production as well as several aspects of growth including plasmid transfer and stationary phase adaptation [8], [26] for reviews). Comparative analysis with known AHL regulators shows that there are 11 LuxR-type regulators in R. etli and 9 in R. leguminosarum. Some of them are known AHL regulators (CinR, TraR and RhiR) with associated AHL synthases (CinI, TraI, and RhiI) but there are also three other regulators, ExpR, AvhR and AsaR, for which there are no matching AHL synthases. In addition, we identified three LuxR-like sequences in R. leguminosarum (RL0606, RL0607 and RL3528) that matched the LuxR family over their entire length, but they could not be identified using protein domain searches. Two of these (RL0606 and RL0607) are highly conserved in R. etli, and in each case, they are located within a cluster of genes associated with bacterial motility, chemotaxis and flagella biosynthesis. Two related genes, visN and visR from S. meliloti strain RU10/406 act as global regulators of flagellar motility and chemotaxis, their products probably functioning as a heterodimer [27]. Although the third regulator (RL3258) also appears to be conserved in R. etli (CH03080) it has no known function. Remarkably, RhiR regulates the rhiABC operon that plays an undefined role in legume infection in R. leguminosarum, although this regulator is not present in R. etli, [28]. Discussion Rhizobium genomes consist of single circular chromosomes and several large plasmids. It is not understood why these genomes are so large and divided. Young et al. (2006) proposed that microbial life in the soil, a very heterogeneous environment, selects for a versatile genomes that encode multiple capabilities [2]. Therefore, genome comparisons between closely related Rhizobium species may indicate how variable these capabilities could be, as well as establishing whether they are distributed throughout the genome or in particular replicons. The comparative analysis presented here allows us to conclude that most of the differences between R. etli and R. leguminosarum tend to be in the plasmids. Previous genomic comparisons of S. meliloti, A. tumefaciens, and R. etli have shown that chromosomes are well conserved both in gene content and gene order, whereas plasmids have few common regions (nif-nod, tra-trb, vir, and others) and a lack of synteny [8]. These comparisons indicate that the plasmids in those three species are not closely related phylogenetically or that they have undergone many recombination events. Our analysis reveals many syntenic blocks exist between some pairs of plasmids of R. etli and R. leguminosarum (p42f-pRL12, p42e-pRL11 and p42b-pRL9 as well large parts of p42c with pRL10) suggesting a common origin. Plasmids of R. etli are smaller than those of R. leguminosarum, and 44–58% of their length is contained in CBs common to R. leguminosarum. Nonetheless, the phylogenetic relationships among the plasmids remain obscure. A particular case of the mosaic structure of Rhizobium plasmids is shown by comparison of the symbiotic plasmids. In R. leguminosarum the pSyms are variable in size and also differ in repC group [2]. It has been noted that pRL10 and pRL1 (a pSym of 200 kb in R. leguminosarum) have a virtually identical nod-nif region, but the remainder of these plasmids appear to be dissimilar [2]. Speculatively, the entire symbiotic region may be a mobile element in R. leguminosarum, as has been proposed for the symbiotic region of p42d [8]. Although direct evidence for this scenario is still lacking, it is plausible given the observed recombinational plasticity displayed by rhizobial plasmids (reviewed by [29], [30]. Nevertheless, the overall structure of pRL10 more closely resembles p42c than p42d of R. etli (Figure 2 Some authors have proposed that bacterial genomes consist of “core” and “accessory” components [2], [32]. The “Core” component, exemplified by the chromosome, is more stable and changes more slowly over time than the “accessory” component. Plasmids are prototypical accessory elements composed of genes from different genomic contexts and evolutionary origin. As shown here, R. etli and R. leguminosarum are good models to study the evolution of plasmid (“accessory”) versus chromosome (“core”) evolution. Their chromosomes are nearly identical and harbor a distinct collection of plasmids that have evolved at different rates to the chromosome. It is tantalizing to speculate that these organisms can recruit plasmids from a pool in their soil environment [32]. Plasmids p42a, p42d, pRL7 and pRL8, in particular, seem to be the outliers. Other plasmids share many common regions and might have been part of the ancestral chromosome. Shuffling of the repABC genes might be a strategy to allow many plasmids to coexist in the same bacterium, and might explain the amazing plasmid diversity of Rhizobium. A more comprehensive picture of the evolution of the partitioned genomes can only be reached by comparing the respective plasmid pool of additional strains of R. etli and R. leguminosarum to describe how they are able to function in a common genomic framework. Methods Phylogenetic analysis The 16S rRNA sequences were downloaded from EMBL for R. leguminosarum bv viciae Rlv3841, R. etli CFN42, Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58, Sinorhizobium meliloti 2011, Mesorhizobium loti MAFF303099, Bradyrhizobium japonicum USDA 110 and Escherichia coli T10. We first aligned the sequences using ClustalX [33] and generated a maximum likelihood tree using the PHYLIP package [34]. Genome Comparisons The complete nucleotide sequences of the R. etli CFN42 and R. leguminosarum Rlv3841 were obtained from Genbank (Accession numbers: R. etli, NC_007761-NC_007766, and NC_004041; R. leguminosarum NC_008378-NC008384). The sequences of the replicons for each genome were concatenated and used in a global comparison using ACT [15] and the Nucmer application of the Mummer package [16], with the default settings. To calculate the CBs, we took the nucmer.delta output and then parsed it with the show-coords utility. Syntenic segments >1 kb and separated by >1 kb were curated with ad hoc perl scripts and manual editing. Clustering of protein families. First we did BLAST-P comparisons of “all versus all” complete proteomes of R. etli, R. leguminosarum, S. meliloti and A. tumefaciens. Clustering was achieved with MCL using an e-value of 10−7 and an inflation parameter of 1.5 [14]. Homolog grouping and analysis of evolutionary rates The most probable set of homologous proteins shared by R. etli and R. leguminosarum was identified using a reciprocal best-hit criterion. To that end, all R. etli predicted proteins were searched against the R. leguminosarum predicted proteome and vice versa using BLAST with cutoff e value of 10−12 and employing the Blosum-80 matrix [35]. In addition to this criterion, to be included in a homolog group the difference in length between the subject protein and query protein had to be <10%, the alignment region had to be at least of 80%, and there had to be a at least 50% similarity of both query and target sizes. We identified 5,470 homolog groups. The whole set was divided into two subdivisions. The first subdivision contains all the homolog groups in which there was only one protein per genome (unique bidirectional hits or possible orthologs, 2,917). The second subdivision contains homolog groups in which there is more than one protein in at least one genome, that is, possible paralogs (2,533). Further classification of the homolog groups was based on their localization. The “chromosomal-only” group (CHR-O) of homologs is present only in the chromosomes of both genomes, whereas the non-chromosomal group (N-CHR) was located either in chromosome or in plasmids, or exclusively in plasmids. Exclusive genes were recorded as those with no hits in the genomes at e-value of <10−6. The number of nucleotide substitutions per synonymous site “Ks” and the number of nucleotide substitutions per non-synonymous site “Ka” were determined with yn00 from PAML13.14 [36] Identification of genes involved in quorum sensing We identified LuxI homologues using homology searches and independently determined proteins matching InterPro family IPR001690 (Autoinducer synthase). Both methods gave identical results. LuxR homologues were identified using homology searches as a guide, but were not by themselves used to identify likely LuxR proteins since the C-terminal DNA-binding domain in LuxR is also present at the C-terminus of a number of other proteins. Proteins containing the InterPro domain IPR005143 were identified, which corresponds to the N-terminal autoinducer-binding domain. Identification of horizontally acquired regions Potentially horizontally acquired areas of DNA were identified with the Alien Hunter program, available from http://www.sanger.ac.uk/Software/analysis/alien_hunter. Table S1 General features of the Genomes of R.etli and R.leguminosarum. A comparison of the main features of the genomes of Rhizobium leguminosarum and Rhizobium etli. Each replicon is described in terms of length in base pairs, %G+C content and number of coding sequences (CDS). (0.04 MB DOC) Click here for additional data file.(39K, doc) Figure S1 Phylogenetic tree. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree showing bacteria related to R.etli and R.leguminosarum (0.08 MB TIF) Click here for additional data file.(75K, tif) Figure S2 Chimeric structure of R.etli plasmid p42d. The circles show (outermost to innermost): 1. Atypical regions as bars of degraded colour (red to pale rose) according to the scores obtained from Alien Hunter (red, highest score 73 over a threshold of 32). 2. The 125 kb nif-nod region. 3, CDS of p42d according to the following colour code: blue, nodulation genes; yellow, nif genes; red, energy transfer genes (fix genes); green, insertion sequences; pink, transfer and replication genes; brown, hypotheticals; grey, transport (vir and tssIII genes); sky blue, regulators. 4. Insertion sequences 5. Repeats from 100 to 300 identical nucleotides (black lines); repeats higher than 300 nucleotides (red lines). (0.54 MB EPS) Click here for additional data file.(529K, eps) Acknowledgments The UNAM group wishes to thank the assistance of Patricia Bustos, Rosa I. Santamaría and José L. Fernández. Critical reading of the manuscript by Xianwu Guo is also appreciated. Footnotes Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. Funding: CONACyT 46333-Q and PAPIIT-UNAM IN223005-5 grants supported work on Rhizobium etli. Work on Rhizobium leguminosarum was supported by the Wellcome Trust and the BBSRC under grants 104/P16988, 208/BRE13665, and 208/PRS12210. References 1. González V, Santamaría RI, Bustos P, Hernández-González I, Medrano-Soto A, et al. The partitioned Rhizobium etli genome: genetic and metabolic redundancy in seven interacting replicons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:3834–3839. [PubMed] 2. Young JP, Crossman LC, Johnston AW, Thomson NR, Ghazoui ZF, et al. The genome of Rhizobium leguminosarum has recognizable core and accessory components. Genome Biol. 2006;7:R34. [PubMed] 3. Kaneko T, Nakamura Y, Sato S, Asamizu E, Kato T, et al. Complete genome structure of the nitrogen-fixing symbiotic bacterium Mesorhizobium loti. DNA Res. 2000;7:331–338. [PubMed] 4. Kaneko T, Nakamura Y, Sato S, Minamisawa K, Uchiumi T, et al. Complete genomic sequence of nitrogen-fixing symbiotic bacterium Bradyrhizobium japonicum USDA110 (supplement). DNA Res. 2002;9:225–256. [PubMed] 5. Galibert F, Finan TM, Long SR, Pühler A, Abola P, et al. The composite genome of the legume symbiont Sinorhizobium meliloti. Science. 2001;293:668–672. [PubMed] 6. Giraud E, Moulin L, Vallenet D, Barbe V, Cytryn E, et al. Legumes symbioses: absence of Nod genes in photosynthetic bradyrhizobia. Science. 2007;316:1307–1312. [PubMed] 7. Jumas-Bilak E, Michaux-Charachon S, Bourg G, Ramuz M, Allardet-Servent A. Unconventional genomic organization in the alpha subgroup of the Proteobacteria. J Bacteriol. 1998;180:2749–2755. [PubMed] 8. González V, Bustos P, Ramírez-Romero MA, Medrano-Soto A, Salgado H, et al. The mosaic structure of the symbiotic plasmid of Rhizobium etli CFN42 and its relation to other symbiotic genome compartments. Genome Biol. 2003;4:R36. [PubMed] 9. Brom S, García-de los Santos A, Cervantes L, Palacios R, Romero D. In Rhizobium etli symbiotic plasmid transfer, nodulation competitivity and cellular growth require interaction among different replicons. Plasmid. 2000;44:34–43. [PubMed] 10. Tun-Garrido C, Bustos P, González V, Brom S. Conjugative transfer of p42a from Rhizobium etli CFN42, which is required for mobilization of the symbiotic plasmid, is regulated by quorum sensing. J Bacteriol. 2003;185:1681–1692. [PubMed] 11. Brom S, Girard L, Tun-Garrido C, García-de los Santos A, Bustos P, et al. Transfer of the symbiotic plasmid of Rhizobium etli CFN42 requires cointegration with p42a, which may be mediated by site-specific recombination. J Bacteriol. 2004;186:7538–7548. [PubMed] 12. Pérez-Mendoza D, Domínguez-Ferreras A, Muñoz S, Soto MJ, Olivares J, et al. Identification of functional mob regions in Rhizobium etli: evidence for self-transmissibility of the symbiotic plasmid pRetCFN42d. J Bacteriol. 2004;186:5753–5761. [PubMed] 13. Pérez-Mendoza D, Sepúlveda E, Pando V, Muñoz S, Nogales J, et al. Identification of the rctA gene, which is required for repression of conjugative transfer of rhizobial symbiotic megaplasmids. J Bacteriol. 2005;187:7341–7350. [PubMed] 14. Enright AJ, Van Dongen S, Ouzounis CA. An efficient algorithm for large-scale detection of protein families. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:1575–1584. [PubMed] 15. Carver TJ, Rutherford KM, Berriman M, Rajandream MA, Barrell BG, et al. ACT: the Artemis Comparison Tool. Bioinformatics. 2005;21:3422–3423. [PubMed] 16. Delcher AL, Phillippy A, Carlton J, Salzberg SL. Fast algorithms for large-scale genome alignment and comparison. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:2478–2483. [PubMed] 17. Richardson JS, Hynes MF, Oresnik IJ. A genetic locus necessary for rhamnose uptake and catabolism in Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. trifolii. J Bacteriol. 2004;186:8433–8442. [PubMed] 18. Karunakaran R, Ebert K, Harvey S, Leonard ME, Ramachandran V, et al. Thiamine is synthesized by a salvage pathway in Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae strain 3841. J Bacteriol. 2006;188:6661–6668. [PubMed] 19. Girard L, Brom S, Davalos A, López O, Soberón M, et al. Differential regulation of fixN-reiterated genes in Rhizobium etli by a novel fixL-fixK cascade. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2000;13:1283–1292. [PubMed] 20. Riley M. Functions of the gene products of Escherichia coli. Microbiol Rev. 1993;57:862–952. [PubMed] 21. Tatusov RL, Koonin EV, Lipman DJ. A genomic perspective on protein families. Science. 1997;278:631–637. [PubMed] 22. Cevallos MA, Porta H, Izquierdo J, Tun-Garrido C, García-de-los-Santos A, et al. Rhizobium etli CFN42 contains at least three plasmids of the repABC family: a structural and evolutionary analysis. Plasmid. 2002;48:104–116. [PubMed] 23. Vernikos GS, Parkhill J. Interpolated variable order motifs for identification of horizontally acquired DNA: revisiting the Salmonella pathogenicity islands. Bioinformatics. 2006;22:2196–2203. [PubMed] 24. Bueno E, Gómez-Hernández N, Girard L, Bedmar EJ, Delgado MJ. Function of the Rhizobium etli CFN42 nirK gene in nitrite metabolism. Biochem Soc Trans. 2005;33:162–163. [PubMed] 25. Yost CK, Rath AM, Noel TC, Hynes MF. Characterization of genes involved in erythritol catabolism in Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae. Microbiology. 2006;152:2061–2074. [PubMed] 26. Sánchez-Contreras M, Bauer WD, Gao M, Robinson JB, Allan Downie J. Quorum-sensing regulation in rhizobia and its role in symbiotic interactions with legumes. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007;362:1149–1163. [PubMed] 27. Sourjik V, Muschler P, Scharf B, Schmitt R. VisN and VisR are global regulators of chemotaxis, flagellar, and motility genes in Sinorhizobium (Rhizobium) meliloti. J Bacteriol. 2000;182:782–788. [PubMed] 28. Rosemeyer V, Michiels J, Verreth C, Vanderleyden J. luxI- and luxR-homologous genes of Rhizobium etli CNPAF512 contribute to synthesis of autoinducer molecules and nodulation of Phaseolus vulgaris. J Bacteriol. 1998;180:815–821. [PubMed] 29. Palacios R, Flores M. Genome dynamics in rhizobial organisms. In: Newton WE, Palacios R, editors. In Genomes and Genomics of Nitrogen-fixing Organisms. Springer; 2005. pp. 183–200. 30. Romero D, Brom S. Phillips G, Funnell BE, editors. The symbiotic plasmids of the Rhizobiaceae. In: (Chapter 12), Plasmid Biology: American Society for Microbiology. 2004. pp. 271–290. 31. Flores M, Morales L, Avila A, González V, Bustos P, et al. Diversification of DNA sequences in the symbiotic genome of Rhizobium etli. J Bacteriol. 2005;187:7185–7192. [PubMed] 32. Reanney D. Extrachromosomal elements as possible agents of adaptation and development. Bacteriol Rev. 1976;40:552–590. [PubMed] 33. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:4876–4882. [PubMed] 34. Felsenstein J. 2005 “Phylip (Phylogeny Inference Package) version 3.6.” Distributed by the author, Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle. 35. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215:403–410. [PubMed] 36. Yang Z. PAML: a program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Comput Appl Biosci. 1997;13:555–556. [PubMed] |
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Mar 7; 103(10):3834-9.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006]Genome Biol. 2006; 7(4):R34.
[Genome Biol. 2006]DNA Res. 2000 Dec 31; 7(6):331-8.
[DNA Res. 2000]Science. 2007 Jun 1; 316(5829):1307-12.
[Science. 2007]J Bacteriol. 1998 May; 180(10):2749-55.
[J Bacteriol. 1998]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Mar 7; 103(10):3834-9.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006]Genome Biol. 2006; 7(4):R34.
[Genome Biol. 2006]Genome Biol. 2003; 4(6):R36.
[Genome Biol. 2003]Plasmid. 2000 Jul; 44(1):34-43.
[Plasmid. 2000]J Bacteriol. 2004 Nov; 186(22):7538-48.
[J Bacteriol. 2004]Nucleic Acids Res. 2002 Apr 1; 30(7):1575-84.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 2002]Bioinformatics. 2005 Aug 15; 21(16):3422-3.
[Bioinformatics. 2005]Nucleic Acids Res. 2002 Jun 1; 30(11):2478-83.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 2002]J Bacteriol. 2004 Dec; 186(24):8433-42.
[J Bacteriol. 2004]J Bacteriol. 2006 Sep; 188(18):6661-8.
[J Bacteriol. 2006]Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2000 Dec; 13(12):1283-92.
[Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2000]Bioinformatics. 2005 Aug 15; 21(16):3422-3.
[Bioinformatics. 2005]Microbiol Rev. 1993 Dec; 57(4):862-952.
[Microbiol Rev. 1993]Science. 1997 Oct 24; 278(5338):631-7.
[Science. 1997]Plasmid. 2002 Sep; 48(2):104-16.
[Plasmid. 2002]Genome Biol. 2003; 4(6):R36.
[Genome Biol. 2003]Bioinformatics. 2006 Sep 15; 22(18):2196-203.
[Bioinformatics. 2006]Genome Biol. 2003; 4(6):R36.
[Genome Biol. 2003]Biochem Soc Trans. 2005 Feb; 33(Pt 1):162-3.
[Biochem Soc Trans. 2005]Microbiology. 2006 Jul; 152(Pt 7):2061-74.
[Microbiology. 2006]Genome Biol. 2003; 4(6):R36.
[Genome Biol. 2003]Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007 Jul 29; 362(1483):1149-63.
[Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007]J Bacteriol. 2000 Feb; 182(3):782-8.
[J Bacteriol. 2000]J Bacteriol. 1998 Feb; 180(4):815-21.
[J Bacteriol. 1998]Genome Biol. 2006; 7(4):R34.
[Genome Biol. 2006]Genome Biol. 2003; 4(6):R36.
[Genome Biol. 2003]Genome Biol. 2006; 7(4):R34.
[Genome Biol. 2006]Genome Biol. 2003; 4(6):R36.
[Genome Biol. 2003]J Bacteriol. 2005 Nov; 187(21):7185-92.
[J Bacteriol. 2005]Genome Biol. 2006; 7(4):R34.
[Genome Biol. 2006]Bacteriol Rev. 1976 Sep; 40(3):552-90.
[Bacteriol Rev. 1976]Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 Dec 15; 25(24):4876-82.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 1997]Bioinformatics. 2005 Aug 15; 21(16):3422-3.
[Bioinformatics. 2005]Nucleic Acids Res. 2002 Jun 1; 30(11):2478-83.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 2002]Nucleic Acids Res. 2002 Apr 1; 30(7):1575-84.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 2002]J Mol Biol. 1990 Oct 5; 215(3):403-10.
[J Mol Biol. 1990]Comput Appl Biosci. 1997 Oct; 13(5):555-6.
[Comput Appl Biosci. 1997]