![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright : © 2008 Chi et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Genetic and Physiologic Dissection of the Vertebrate Cardiac Conduction System 1 Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics and Programs in Developmental Biology, Genetics, and Human Genetics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America 2 Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America 3 Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America 4 Department of Physiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America 5 Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America 6 Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America 7 Nora Eccles Harrison Cardiovascular Research and Training Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America 8 Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America 9 Program in Developmental and Stem Cell Biology, The Hospital for Sick Children, and Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 10 Developmental Biology, Biomedical Research Foundation, Academy of Athens, Athens, Greece 11 Department of Physiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America 12 Programs in Neuroscience, Genetics, Human Genetics, and Developmental Biology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America Brigid L.M Hogan, Academic Editor Duke University, United States of America * To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: Neil.Chi/at/ucsf.edu (NCC); Email: didier_stainier/at/biochem.ucsf.edu (DYRS) Received February 23, 2007; Accepted March 20, 2008. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract Vertebrate hearts depend on highly specialized cardiomyocytes that form the cardiac conduction system (CCS) to coordinate chamber contraction and drive blood efficiently and unidirectionally throughout the organism. Defects in this specialized wiring system can lead to syncope and sudden cardiac death. Thus, a greater understanding of cardiac conduction development may help to prevent these devastating clinical outcomes. Utilizing a cardiac-specific fluorescent calcium indicator zebrafish transgenic line, Tg(cmlc2:gCaMP)s878, that allows for in vivo optical mapping analysis in intact animals, we identified and analyzed four distinct stages of cardiac conduction development that correspond to cellular and anatomical changes of the developing heart. Additionally, we observed that epigenetic factors, such as hemodynamic flow and contraction, regulate the fast conduction network of this specialized electrical system. To identify novel regulators of the CCS, we designed and performed a new, physiology-based, forward genetic screen and identified for the first time, to our knowledge, 17 conduction-specific mutations. Positional cloning of hobgoblins634 revealed that tcf2, a homeobox transcription factor gene involved in mature onset diabetes of the young and familial glomerulocystic kidney disease, also regulates conduction between the atrium and the ventricle. The combination of the Tg(cmlc2:gCaMP)s878 line/in vivo optical mapping technique and characterization of cardiac conduction mutants provides a novel multidisciplinary approach to further understand the molecular determinants of the vertebrate CCS. Author Summary Aberrant electrical activity of the heart, otherwise known as cardiac arrhythmia, may disrupt heart contractions, leading to loss of consciousness and sudden death. Every year, approximately 450,000 individuals in the United States die suddenly from this event. Currently, the only proven preventive therapy for sudden cardiac death is the automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator, which carries a significant burden and cost to the patient. Greater understanding of the cardiac conduction system, which coordinates rhythmic beating of the heart, may lead to novel and safer therapeutic options for these patients. Working with zebrafish, a productive model system for understanding human disease, we have developed a cardiac-specific fluorescent calcium indicator zebrafish transgenic line to analyze the formation of the cardiac conduction system. Using this fluorescent transgenic line, we have observed four distinct physiologic cardiac conduction stages that correspond to cellular and anatomic changes of the developing heart. Furthermore, we have designed and performed a new, physiology-based, forward genetic screen to identify cardiac conduction mutants that would have escaped discovery in previous screens. Overall, these studies may prove rewarding toward developing therapeutic options aimed at maintaining and/or improving overall cardiac health. Introduction Vertebrate hearts have evolved into multichambered structures requiring coordinated beating of their chambers to achieve antegrade blood flow throughout the organism. Unidirectional blood flow is achieved through two specialized structures that are unique to vertebrates: cardiac valves and the specialized cardiac conduction system (CCS). In the adult heart, the initial electrical impulses are generated in the slow pacemaker sino-atrial (SA) node and then propagated across the atrium. This electrical impulse is delayed at the atrioventricular (AV) boundary through specialized slow conducting AV node cardiomyocytes. After the delay at the AV node, electrical propagation travels rapidly through the fast conduction network comprised of the His-Purkinje system, which coordinates ventricular activation to occur from the apex to the base of the heart. This apex-to-base activation allows for efficient ejection of blood from the ventricles into the outflow tracts (OFTs) at the base of the heart [1]. Despite extensive knowledge of the anatomy and physiology of the adult vertebrate CCS, the cellular and molecular events that govern the development of this specialized tissue remain unclear. Lineage tracing studies have revealed that the CCS is derived from cardiomyocyte progenitors [2,3]. Myocardial factors that regulate the specification of the CCS include Nkx2.5 and Tbx5 [2,4]. Loss of either transcriptional regulator leads to defects in the maturation and maintenance of the AV conduction system and subsequent AV heart block and bundle branch block. Additional studies have revealed the requirement of the endocardium for cardiomyocyte specification to form the fast conduction network within the ventricle [5–7]. Secreted factors from endocardial as well as other cardiac endothelial cells, such as Endothelin 1 and Neuregulin, are able to induce cardiac conduction markers in cultured embryonic cardiomyocytes and cultured hearts [7–9]. Furthermore, hemodynamic changes regulate the secretion of Endothelin 1 from endocardial cells, thereby affecting the development of the fast conduction pathway [6]. More recently, the role of the endocardium for the development of AV conduction delay has been investigated further using the zebrafish cloche mutant [5], which lacks endothelial cells among other defects [10]. That study concluded that Neuregulin but not Endothelin 1 is required for the induction of AV conduction delay. Optical mapping of cardiac excitation using voltage- and calcium-sensitive dyes has allowed the spatiotemporal analysis of electrical excitation wave dynamics, not only advancing our understanding of the electrical activity during cardiac arrhythmias but also allowing for further analysis of CCS development [11]. However, the use of voltage- and calcium-sensitive dyes is associated with serious shortcomings, including a lack of cellular targeting, limited live animal experimentation, the need for physical loading of these indicators into cells, and cellular toxicity. To circumvent these problems, fluorescent calcium indicator proteins have begun to replace voltage- and calcium-sensitive dyes for physiologic in vivo analysis of tissue/organ electrical activity in different animal model systems including fly and mouse [12–14]. Yet, optical mapping of mouse hearts is currently limited due to explantation for ex vivo analysis. Thus, we have taken advantage of the external fertilization and translucency of zebrafish embryos to create a cardiac-specific fluorescent calcium indicator transgenic line, Tg(cmlc2:gCaMP)s878, to perform in vivo optical mapping analyses throughout the stages of heart development. Here we describe a multidisciplinary approach using the zebrafish toward understanding CCS development. Utilizing the Tg(cmlc2:gCaMP)s878 optical mapping system, we identified four distinct physiologic developmental stages of the CCS that correspond to cellular and anatomical changes of the developing zebrafish heart. (1) Initially, a linear conduction travels across the heart tube from the sinus venosus to the OFT (20–24 hours postfertilization (hpf)); (2) next, a significant AV conduction delay develops during cardiac chamber formation (36–48 hpf); (3) as the heart loops and develops ventricular trabeculations (72–96 hpf), an immature fast conduction network develops within the ventricle; (4) finally, this fast conduction network fully matures to an apex-to-base activation pattern when the ventricular apex has formed. Furthermore, to identify regulators of CCS development, we performed a diploid ethylnitrosourea (ENU) mutagenesis screen and recovered several novel as well as known cardiovascular conduction/rhythm mutants, which we have analyzed using in vivo optical imaging techniques and classified according to the affected physiologic developmental stage of the CCS. Positional cloning of hobgoblin (hob), a novel mutant with AV heart block, reveals that tcf2, a homeobox transcription factor gene involved in mature onset diabetes of the young, also regulates conduction between the atrium and the ventricle. Thus, these detailed electrophysiologic and genetic analyses of wild-type and mutant hearts provide further insights into the development of the vertebrate CCS and will lead to a better understanding of the pathogenesis of cardiac arrhythmias. Results Optical Mapping of Tg(cmlc2:gCaMP)s878 Hearts Reveals Distinct Developmental Stages of the Vertebrate CCS Previous studies have utilized calcium green, a calcium-sensitive fluorescent indicator, in zebrafish hearts to observe cardiac conduction up to 48 hpf [5,15]. However, because loading these hearts and/or embryos with calcium green is technically cumbersome and is only temporary, we created a zebrafish transgenic line Tg(cmlc2:gCaMP)s878 that specifically expresses gCaMP, a genetically encoded calcium reporter based on a circular permutation of green fluorescent protein (GFP) [16], at all developmental stages in the heart, using the cardiac-specific promoter cmlc2 [17] (Figure S1). Because cardiac contraction and blood flow begins at the linear heart tube (LHT) stage, we initiated our optical mapping studies on the LHT of 24 hpf Tg(cmlc2:gCaMP)s878 embryos. These experiments revealed that conduction travels unidirectionally in a relatively slow and linear pattern without significant pauses from the sinus venosus to the OFT, suggesting the presence of a functional SA node pacemaker activity (Figure 1
Utilizing the Tg(cmlc2:eGFP-ras)s883 line (Jungblut B, Munson C, Huisken J, Trinh L, Stainier D, unpublished data ), which outlines individual cardiomyocytes with membrane-bound GFP, confocal microscopy was performed to analyze further the cellular characteristics of the LHT. Despite displaying atrial and ventricular molecular changes [18] (Figure 1 Cellular Changes of the Atrial, Ventricular, and AV Myocardial Cells Occur at 36–48 hpf and Correlate with AV Conduction Delay By 36–48 hpf, the zebrafish embryonic heart has developed a distinct AV canal that separates the cardiac chambers (Figure 2
To determine whether cell morphology or orientation may correlate with these conduction velocity differences, we analyzed and measured cardiomyocytes of 48 hpf Tg(cmlc2:eGFP-ras)s883 hearts. On cross-sectional analysis, it appeared that atrial cardiomyocytes had maintained their squamous cell morphology while ventricular cardiomyocytes had become cuboidal (Figure 2 To determine whether these different populations of myocardial cells exhibit distinct electrophysiologic properties, calcium transients of the atrium, ventricle, and AV canal were recorded from fluorescence of a single pixel from each region. Distinct calcium transients were recorded from each region of 48 hpf Tg(cmlc2:gCaMP)s878 hearts (Figure 3
Development of the Rapid Ventricular CCS Occurs at 100 hpf when Hearts Develop Ventricular Trabeculation To achieve efficient ejection of blood from the ventricle to the arterial system, the adult vertebrate ventricle contracts from the apex to the base of the heart (i.e., where the AV canal and OFT reside). This contraction pattern is achieved through the fast cardiac conduction network (the His-Purkinje system), which passes through the ventricular septum in amniotes and allows for apex-to-base conduction across the ventricular myocardium. Previous studies have shown that the fast CCS in chick and mammalian hearts may initially develop along ventricular trabeculae after cardiac looping but prior to ventricular septation [6,21]. To understand further how the fast CCS develops, we analyzed zebrafish hearts at stages after cardiac looping. Using the Tg(flk1:eGFP)s843 line, which marks endocardial cells with green fluorescence [22], we observed that rhodamine-phalloidin–stained 100 hpf zebrafish hearts not only have completed cardiac looping but also have initiated ventricular trabeculation (Figure 4
Optical mapping of 100 hpf Tg(cmlc2:gCaMP)s878 hearts revealed that ventricular conduction has transformed from a primitive linear propagation traveling from the AV canal to the OFT as observed at 48 hpf (Figure 2 At 2–3 weeks of life, when the ventricle clearly forms an apex, we observed that the initial conduction along the trabeculae (Figures 4 To understand further the development of the fast CCS, we examined the expression of gap junction proteins responsible for cardiac conduction. Connexin40 (Cx40) is expressed in the atrium and the fast conduction system of mammalian hearts, and loss of this gap junction protein results in reduced cardiac conduction velocity and a predisposition to cardiac arrhythmias [23]. In contrast, Connexin43 (Cx43) is expressed abundantly throughout the atrial and ventricular myocardium but in lower amounts in the fast conduction system [24,25]. Because both cx40 and cx43 have been suggested to be expressed in zebrafish hearts [26,27], we performed immunostaining on these hearts with antibodies against Cx40 and Cx43. Cx43 immunostaining is present throughout the heart from 24 hpf onwards (Figure 5
Hemodynamic Flow and Contraction Affect the Development of the CCS Epigenetic factors, such as hemodynamic flow and cardiac contraction, previously have been suggested to influence the development of the CCS [6,9]. To determine the role of hemodynamic factors in the development of both slow/AV and fast/ventricular cardiac conduction pathways in zebrafish hearts, we performed optical mapping on the silent heart (sihb109) mutant heart, which fails to contract due to a null mutation in the cardiac troponin T (tnnt2) gene [15]. Optical mapping of 48 hpf Tg(cmlc2:gCaMP)s878; sih mutant hearts revealed an AV conduction delay, similar to that of 48 hpf wild-type hearts [5] (see Figure 7
To determine possible etiologies for the conduction defects in sih mutant hearts, we analyzed rhodamine-phalloidin-stained Tg(flk1:eGFP)s843; sih mutants to assess the effects of the lack of blood flow and contraction on cardiac development. At 100 hpf, sih mutant hearts appear to have undergone cardiac looping and possess endocardium but do not exhibit trabeculae (Figure 6 Forward Genetic Screen for Cardiac Conduction Mutants We performed a large-scale ENU mutagenesis screen using the Tg(cmlc2:gCaMP)s878 line as a secondary screen for physiologic analysis of cardiac conduction to identify genes that specifically regulate the development of the CCS. Intercrosses of F2 families were screened by visual inspection of live embryos for aberrant heart rates and/or coordination of atrial and ventricular contraction at each developmental stage of the CCS (24, 48, and 96 hpf). F2 carriers of putative mutations were outcrossed into the Tg(cmlc2:gCaMP)s878 background to facilitate the physiologic analysis of cardiac conduction. Recovered mutations were organized into phenotypic groups and tested by complementation analysis. We identified 17 mutations defining 14 cardiac conduction regulating loci, four of which previously had been identified (Table 1). Physiologic analyses by optical mapping revealed that the identified mutations disrupt distinct developmental stages of the CCS. Representative examples of phenotypes observed are described below.
We recovered several noncontractile ventricle mutants including s209, s264, s249, s271, and silent ventricles213,s290 [28,29]. Previous work has suggested that a noncontracting ventricle phenotype may be due to contractile defects [15,19,30]. Utilizing the Tg(cmlc2:gCaMP)s878, we discovered that the silent ventricle (siv) mutant heart fails to generate cardiac conduction across the ventricular myocardium (Figure 7 We identified several mutants that had conduction defects across the AV myocardium. The hob s634 mutants develop AV heart block despite displaying a wild-type cardiac morphology and contractility (Figure 7 Finally, we identified a class of cardiac mutants that loses its ventricular conduction at 96 hpf. The mutant, daredevil (ddl), was initially characterized as a cardiovascular contractile mutant in which the ventricle became noncontractile by 96 hpf. Optical mapping of Tg(cmlc2:gCaMP)s878; ddl mutants revealed that these hearts developed heart block between 80–96 hpf and eventually lost all organized ventricular conduction by 96 hpf, resulting in a noncontractile ventricle (Figure 7 Because of its resemblance to human AV heart block (Figure 8
Discussion Previous studies have utilized calcium green, a calcium-sensitive fluorescent dye, in zebrafish hearts to observe cardiac conduction up to 48 hpf [5,15]. Because of its short-lived expression, this method is inadequate to analyze later stages of CCS development. Thus, we comprehensively analyzed the development of the zebrafish CCS through cellular and physiologic studies using two new reporter lines: (1) Tg(cmlc2:gCaMP)s878, a myocardial-specific line that expresses the fluorescent calcium indicator protein, gCaMP, throughout cardiac development, and (2) Tg(cmlc2:eGFP-ras)s883, another myocardial-specific line that allows the morphological analysis of individual cardiomyocytes. These tools enabled us to describe four distinct physiologic cardiac conduction stages that correspond to distinct cellular and anatomical changes of the developing zebrafish heart (Figure 9
Developmental Stages of the CCS The vertebrate CCS can be divided into the slow conduction pathway, which regulates SA pacemaker activity and central AV conduction delay, and the fast conduction pathway, which allows apex-to-base conduction [33]. Through optical mapping of developing wild-type hearts, we observed distinct developmental stages for each of these CCS processes. As early as the LHT stage, we observed that conduction propagates unidirectionally across the myocardium, suggesting the presence of SA node pacemaker activity [34]. Despite chamber specification, no significant conduction delay was detected at this stage. However, increased conduction velocity was observed in the ventricular half of the heart, suggesting that these cardiomyocytes have initiated cellular and molecular changes including the acquisition of relatively faster conducting properties. Interestingly, expression of natriuretic peptide precursor a, a marker of the OC and faster conduction velocities, recently has been observed in a subdomain of the ventricular portion of the LHT near the OFT [19]. The AV conduction delay was observed at 36–48 hpf, a time corresponding to the formation of the AV canal. Action potential and calcium transients of atrial, ventricular, and AV canal regions revealed electrophysiologic differences, suggesting that AV myocardial cells are distinct from atrial and ventricular cells. Whether these differences are due to unique channel expression versus distinct combinatorial effects of several cardiac channels remains unclear. However, weak expression of Connexin40, a marker for fast conduction, was observed at 48 hpf within the atrium and ventricle but lacking from the AV canal. In addition, the AV cardiomyocytes positioned themselves circumferentially around the AV canal. This ring-like orientation of cardiomyocytes has been suggested to contribute to the AV conduction delay [35]. Previous findings suggest that AV endocardial-specific signals, Neuregulin and Notch1b, cause the overlying AV myocardium to differentiate into slow conducting myocardium [5]. Additionally, Tbx3, a transcriptional repressor expressed in the developing conduction system in mouse [36], has been observed in the AV myocardium of 48 hpf zebrafish hearts [37]. Future studies exploring how these myocardial and endocardial factors may impact AV cardiomyocyte morphology, orientation, and action potential properties will be of great interest toward understanding the development of the AV conduction delay. Overall, our findings support studies suggesting that AV cardiomyocytes actively differentiate to become precursors of the AV node [5,20,38]. Despite lacking a distinct interventricular septum, adult zebrafish hearts possess a functionally fast CCS, resulting in an apex-to-base conduction across the ventricular myocardium [39]. Previous studies in mouse and chick have suggested that ventricular trabeculae and Cx40 may be responsible for an apex-to-base conduction prior to ventricular septation [6,21,40]. Consistent with these results, the rapid cardiac conduction network within the zebrafish ventricle develops as early as 96 hpf, a stage when cardiac looping is completed, trabeculae have started forming, and Cx40 expression is present. Loss of blood flow and cardiac contraction prevented the transition of ventricular conduction from a primitive linear pattern to a mature apex-to-base propagation, as previously observed in chick [6]. The absence of this transformation correlated with the lack of trabeculae and Cx40 immunoreactivity. Furthermore, we observed that sih/tnnt2 mutants as well as weak cardiac contractility mutants also developed intermittent AV heart block below the AV canal, suggesting that this defect is within the proximal ventricular portion of the fast CCS rather than the slow AV conduction pathway. How these epigenetic factors modulate the development of the fast CCS remains unknown. However, similar to findings in chick, endocardial signals may be involved, as cloche mutant hearts also fail to develop trabeculae and a fast cardiac conduction network (unpublished data). Finally, a mature apex-to-base ventricular conduction was observed at 21 days postfertilization (dpf) when the hearts develop a distinct apex with increased ventricular trabeculation. Altogether, these data suggest that there is an intermediate step during the development of the mature ventricular apex-to-base conduction prior to the formation of the apex. Overall, these cellular and electrophysiologic data provide the framework for future studies in zebrafish regarding the origin of the vertebrate CCS. Through lineage tracing and optical mapping studies, one should be able to address recent observations related to the ontogeny of the CCS from progenitors that also give rise to chambered myocardium [41]. Systematic Analysis of the Identified Mutants Will Help Elucidate Mechanisms of Cardiac Conduction Development and Cardiac Arrhythmias Previously, a candidate gene approach in zebrafish was performed to identify AV endocardial factors, neuregulin and notch1b, as regulators of AV conduction development [5]. In contrast, we have taken an unbiased approach and performed a new physiology-based forward genetic screen to identify additional mediators of the CCS. The recovered mutants display a wide spectrum of conduction phenotypes that first appear at distinct developmental stages of the CCS (Table 1 and Figure 9 Future analysis and isolation of the genes affected by these mutations promise to uncover new molecular clues and mechanisms that underlie both genetic and acquired forms of heart disease in humans. Novel genes discovered from this screen may be potential candidates for sequencing in population genetic studies of human cardiac arrhythmias. Conversely, candidate genes identified from human genome-wide association studies for cardiac arrhythmias may be validated rapidly and characterized by employing this in vivo optical mapping technique with MO knockdown experiments. Together, these studies will help develop therapeutic options aimed at maintaining and/or improving overall cardiac conduction. Materials and Methods Zebrafish husbandry and generation of the Tg(cmlc2:gCaMP)s878 line. Zebrafish were raised under standard laboratory conditions at 28 °C. We used the following transgenic lines: Tg(flk1:EGFP)s843 [22] and Tg(cmlc2:eGFP-ras)s883 (Jungblut B, Munson C, Huisken J, Trinh L, Stainier D, unpublished data). We generated the Tg(cmlc2:gCaMP)s878 construct by cloning a 900 bp fragment of the cmlc2 promoter [17] upstream of a promoter-less gCaMP construct [16]. We injected 200 pg of linearized DNA into one-cell-stage embryos and selected individual transgenic carrier adults by screening for fluorescent progeny. Six Tg(cmlc2:gCaMP) founders were recovered with identical expression patterns and levels. Homozygous mutant embryos were obtained by incrossing Tg(flk1:EGFP)s84/+; sih/+, Tg(cmlc2:gCaMP)s87/+; sih/+ [15], and Tg(cmlc2:gCaMP)s87/+; conduction mutants double heterozygotes. Immunohistochemistry, confocal microscopy, cell morphology, and in situ analysis. Immunohistochemistry and confocal microscopy were performed as previously described [28,45,46]. The following antibodies were used at the following dilutions: rabbit polyclonal anti-Cx43 (Sigma) at 1:100 and rabbit polyclonal anti-Cx40 (Sigma) at 1:100. Cardiomyocyte surfaces and cross-sections were analyzed using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health (NIH), http://rsb.info.hin.gov/ij/) as described previously [19]. A total of 288 cardiomyocytes were measured from 15 wild-type embryos: 165 OC, 83 IC, and 40 AV canal cardioymyocytes. Circularity measurements discriminate circular cells from elliptical cells. In situ analysis was performed as described [47]. ENU mutagenesis and screen. We screened approximately 9,076 F3 clutches from 2,392 ENU-mutagenized F2 families that were generated in the context of two different screens [28,48–51]. On the basis of the number of crosses per F2 family, we estimate that the screens surveyed 2,723 genomes. The specific locus test for each screen indicated a mutation rate of approximately 0.3% per gene per genome. Positional cloning. Utilizing a set of simple sequence length polymorphism markers, we mapped hobs634 to linkage group 5. Fine mapping with 1,164 mutant embryos narrowed the critical region to two bacterial artificial chromosomes: CHORI-211 77I17 and DanioKey pilot 118E10. This region contained two putative open reading frames, tcf2/vhnf-1 and gamma-synergin. The s634 cDNA was isolated, sequenced, and analyzed for both genes. A point mutation was discovered in tcf2 and confirmed by sequencing s634 genomic DNA. Approximately 0.5–1 ng of an ATG MO against tcf2 (Gene-Tools), 5′-CTAGAGAGGGAAATGCGGTATTGTG-3′, was injected into one-cell-stage embryos. For mRNA rescue experiments, one-cell-stage embryos were injected with 50–100 pg of tcf2 mRNA. Optical mapping by widefield epifluorescence. Individual zebrafish between 24 hpf and 21 dpf were placed on a coverglass. Electromechanical isolation was achieved with 10 mM 2,3-butanedione monoxime (Sigma) applied 15 min before imaging. Single-plane widefield epifluorescence images of the heart were obtained with a Nikon TE-2000 inverted microscope, using 20× and 40× Plan Apo air objectives, an Xcite-120 (Exfo) widefield epifluorescent source, and standard fluorescein isothiocyanate filter set. Images were acquired with a Coolsnap HQ camera (Photometrics) using Metavue software (Molecular Devices) in stream acquisition mode at a frame rate of 30 ms/frame (512 × 512 pixels) for 48 hpf hearts and 15 ms/frame (256 × 256 pixels) for 96 hpf hearts. Image processing first consisted of manual adjustment of minor spatial shifts of the image over a temporal imaging series. Then, the fluorescence intensity of each pixel in a 2-D map was normalized to its percentage between the minimum and the maximum recorded values of the pixel over the full series. Isochronal lines at 60 ms intervals were obtained by identifying the maximal spatial gradient for a given time point. The color-coded scheme in each panel and video describes progressive activation of the heart with white/red cells and black/blue cells indicating depolarization and repolarization, respectively. Software processing was performed with Metavue software and procedures written in Matlab (Mathworks). Isolated calcium transient recordings by selective plane illumination microscopy. Videos of the cardiac conduction wave were recorded with selective plane illumination microscopy [52]. The attenuated 488-nm laser line from a diode-pumped solid-state laser (Coherent Sapphire, 30 mW) was focused to a light sheet with a thickness of 6 μm. The sample was oriented such that a thin slice of atrium, AV canal, and ventricle was illuminated. The fluorescence was collected at 90 frames per second with a 20×/0.5 objective lens (Leica) and an emission filter (Chroma, HQ 525/50m) and imaged on an EM-CCD camera (Andor DV885). The microscope and camera were controlled with a Labview (National Instruments) program and analyzed with Matlab. In each sequence, several 15 × 15 pixel areas (i.e. 12 × 12 μm) were selected, and the intensity in these areas was plotted over time. Action potential recordings from embryonic heart. The 48 hpf embryos were dechorionated and anesthetized with 0.02% tricaine for 1–2 min. The heart was dissected from the thorax en bloc, and all experiments were performed at room temperature. The recording chamber was perfused with the following solution containing (in mM) 140 NaCl, 4 KCl, 1.8 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, 10 glucose, and 10 HEPES, pH 7.4. Suction pipettes were made from borosilicate capillary tubes (8250 glass, A-M Systems) and fire-polished to obtain resistances of 6–9 MΩ when filled with (in mM) 120 KCl, 5 EGTA, 5 K2ATP, 5 MgCl2, and 10 HEPES, pH 7.2. Transmembrane potential was measured using an Axoclamp 2A amplifier (Molecular Devices) in the bridge mode using the disrupted patch technique. The pipette was positioned adjacent to the heart, and a seal was formed by application of minimal suction. Through the use of this technique, stable spontaneous APs were recordable for up to 2 h. Transmembrane voltage was filtered at 10 kHz and digitized at a sampling frequency of 20 kHz with a 12-bit analog-to-digital converter (Digidata 1322A Interface, Molecular Devices). Figure S1: Comparison of Calcium-Green–Injected Embryos versus Stable Tg(cmlc2:gCaMP)s878 Embryos (A, E, I, M, Q) Epifluorescence micrographs of calcium-green-injected live zebrafish embryos at 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hpf. Note ubiquitous and strong fluorescence throughout most of the embryo. (B, F, J, N, R) Higher magnification epifluorescence micrographs of calcium-green-injected embryos focusing on the hearts at 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hpf. Weaker calcium-green fluorescence is observed as the embryos develop. (C, G, K, O, S) Epifluorescence micrographs of Tg(cmlc2:gCaMP)s878 live embryos at 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hpf. Specific gCaMP fluorescence is detected only in hearts. Autofluorescence is detected in the yolk. (D, H, L, P, T) Higher magnification epifluorescence micrographs of Tg(cmlc2:gCaMP)s878 embryos focusing on the hearts at 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hpf. Autofluorescence from yolk does not interfere with imaging the hearts. At, atrium; V, ventricle; HT, heart tube. (2.1 MB AI). Click here for additional data file.(2.0M, pdf) Video S1: Optical Mapping of 24 hpf Tg(cmlc2:gCaMP)s878 Hearts Reveals Linear and Slow Conduction throughout the Heart Tube Calcium activation initiates at the sinus venosus pole (right) and travels across the heart tube to the OFT (left). (3.4 MB MOV) Click here for additional data file.(3.3M, mov) Video S2: Optical Mapping of 48 hpf Tg(cmlc2:gCaMP)s878 Hearts Reveals AV Conduction Delay Calcium activation initiates in the atrium (upper right) and travels to the AV canal where it is significantly delayed. Calcium excitation is completed as the wave front propagates from the AV canal through the ventricle (lower left) and to the OFT. (4.5 MB MOV) Click here for additional data file.(4.4M, mov) Video S3: Optical Mapping of 100 hpf Tg(cmlc2:gCaMP)s878 Hearts Reveals the Fast CCS Calcium activation initiates in the atrium (left) and travels to the AV canal where it is significantly delayed. Calcium excitation within the ventricle (right) initiates within the trabeculae and travels across the ventricular myocardium from the OC toward the base. (5.4 MB MOV) Click here for additional data file.(5.2M, mov) Video S4: 48 hpf hobs634 Mutant Heart Brightfield video of hobs634 mutant heart. The 48 hpf hob mutant hearts develop AV heart block when heart chambers form. Not all atrial beats are conducted to the ventricle. (4.4 MB MOV) Click here for additional data file.(4.2M, mov) Acknowledgments We thank all of the members of the Baier and Stainier laboratory screen teams for their support during the screens; Steve Waldron, Natasha Zvenigorodsky, and Ana Ayala for expert help with the fish; Takashi Mikawa for critical comments on the manuscript; and Junichi Nakai for the gCaMP vector. Abbreviations
Footnotes Author contributions. NCC, RMS, BJ, JH,, HB, LYJ, MT-F and DYRS conceived and designed the experiments. NCC, RMS, BJ, JH, TF, IS, DB, TX and MT-F performed the experiments. All authors analyzed the data. NCC, RMS, BJ, JH, RA, TA, IS, DB, TX, HB, LYJ, MT-F contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools. NCC, RMS, JH, TF, RA, IS, DB, MT-F, and DYRS wrote the paper. Funding. NCC and RMS are supported by K08 grants from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), GlaxoSmithKline Research & Education Foundation Cardiovascular Awards, and Fellow to Faculty American Heart Associated Postdoctoral Awards. JH is and DB was supported by a Human Frontier Science Project Organization fellowship. RA was supported by the Sarnoff Cardiovascular Research Foundation. This work was supported in part by grants from the Packard Foundation and the NIH (NHLBI) to DYRS. Competing interests. The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Circ Res. 2005 Apr 29; 96(8):809-11.
[Circ Res. 2005]Cell. 2004 Apr 30; 117(3):373-86.
[Cell. 2004]Development. 1995 May; 121(5):1423-31.
[Development. 1995]Development. 2004 Aug; 131(16):4107-16.
[Development. 2004]Development. 2006 Mar; 133(6):1125-32.
[Development. 2006]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Aug 6; 99(16):10464-9.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Jun 9; 95(12):6815-8.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998]Development. 2004 Feb; 131(3):581-92.
[Development. 2004]Dev Cell. 2007 Aug; 13(2):254-67.
[Dev Cell. 2007]Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol. 2004 Oct; 280(2):1018-21.
[Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol. 2004]Cell. 2003 Jan 24; 112(2):271-82.
[Cell. 2003]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Mar 21; 103(12):4753-8.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006]Development. 2006 Mar; 133(6):1125-32.
[Development. 2006]Nat Genet. 2002 May; 31(1):106-10.
[Nat Genet. 2002]Nat Biotechnol. 2001 Feb; 19(2):137-41.
[Nat Biotechnol. 2001]Dev Dyn. 2003 Sep; 228(1):30-40.
[Dev Dyn. 2003]Semin Cell Dev Biol. 1999 Feb; 10(1):93-8.
[Semin Cell Dev Biol. 1999]PLoS Biol. 2007 Mar; 5(3):e53.
[PLoS Biol. 2007]Circulation. 1996 Aug 1; 94(3):571-7.
[Circulation. 1996]Development. 2004 Feb; 131(3):581-92.
[Development. 2004]Development. 2001 May; 128(10):1785-92.
[Development. 2001]Development. 2005 Dec; 132(23):5199-209.
[Development. 2005]Curr Biol. 1998 Feb 26; 8(5):299-302.
[Curr Biol. 1998]Circ Res. 1993 Aug; 73(2):344-50.
[Circ Res. 1993]J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994 Oct; 24(4):1124-32.
[J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994]Dev Biol. 2005 Feb 1; 278(1):208-19.
[Dev Biol. 2005]Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2004 May; 286(5):H1623-32.
[Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2004]Development. 2004 Feb; 131(3):581-92.
[Development. 2004]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Jun 9; 95(12):6815-8.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998]Nat Genet. 2002 May; 31(1):106-10.
[Nat Genet. 2002]Development. 2006 Mar; 133(6):1125-32.
[Development. 2006]Development. 2005 Sep; 132(18):4193-204.
[Development. 2005]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jul 3; 104(27):11316-21.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007]Nat Genet. 2002 May; 31(1):106-10.
[Nat Genet. 2002]PLoS Biol. 2007 Mar; 5(3):e53.
[PLoS Biol. 2007]Development. 2003 Dec; 130(24):6121-9.
[Development. 2003]Development. 2006 Mar; 133(6):1125-32.
[Development. 2006]Development. 1995 Oct; 121(10):3141-50.
[Development. 1995]Development. 1996 Dec; 123():285-92.
[Development. 1996]Development. 2006 Mar; 133(6):1125-32.
[Development. 2006]Nat Genet. 2002 May; 31(1):106-10.
[Nat Genet. 2002]Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2004 Nov; 14(8):301-7.
[Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2004]Adv Myocardiol. 1980; 1():267-77.
[Adv Myocardiol. 1980]PLoS Biol. 2007 Mar; 5(3):e53.
[PLoS Biol. 2007]Circ Res. 1998 Apr 6; 82(6):629-44.
[Circ Res. 1998]Development. 2006 Mar; 133(6):1125-32.
[Development. 2006]Cardiovasc Res. 2004 Jun 1; 62(3):489-99.
[Cardiovasc Res. 2004]PLoS One. 2007 Apr 25; 2(4):e398.
[PLoS One. 2007]Circulation. 1996 Aug 1; 94(3):571-7.
[Circulation. 1996]Dev Biol. 1977 Apr; 56(2):382-96.
[Dev Biol. 1977]Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2003 Apr; 284(4):H1152-60.
[Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2003]Development. 2004 Feb; 131(3):581-92.
[Development. 2004]Development. 2001 May; 128(10):1785-92.
[Development. 2001]Dev Biol. 1977 Apr; 56(2):397-411.
[Dev Biol. 1977]Cell. 2006 Dec 15; 127(6):1151-65.
[Cell. 2006]Development. 2006 Mar; 133(6):1125-32.
[Development. 2006]Chest. 2005 Oct; 128(4):2611-4.
[Chest. 2005]Nat Cell Biol. 2007 Aug; 9(8):954-60.
[Nat Cell Biol. 2007]Development. 2005 Dec; 132(23):5199-209.
[Development. 2005]Dev Dyn. 2003 Sep; 228(1):30-40.
[Dev Dyn. 2003]Nat Biotechnol. 2001 Feb; 19(2):137-41.
[Nat Biotechnol. 2001]Nat Genet. 2002 May; 31(1):106-10.
[Nat Genet. 2002]Development. 2005 Sep; 132(18):4193-204.
[Development. 2005]Dev Cell. 2004 Mar; 6(3):371-82.
[Dev Cell. 2004]Dev Biol. 1999 Oct 1; 214(1):23-37.
[Dev Biol. 1999]PLoS Biol. 2007 Mar; 5(3):e53.
[PLoS Biol. 2007]Curr Biol. 2005 Mar 8; 15(5):441-6.
[Curr Biol. 2005]Development. 2005 Sep; 132(18):4193-204.
[Development. 2005]Dev Biol. 2005 May 1; 281(1):53-65.
[Dev Biol. 2005]Development. 2005 Jul; 132(13):2955-67.
[Development. 2005]Science. 2004 Aug 13; 305(5686):1007-9.
[Science. 2004]