![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2008, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Drosophila let-7 microRNA is required for remodeling of the neuromusculature during metamorphosis 1 Department of Genetics, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755, USA; 2 Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Physiology, and Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143, USA 3Present addresses: Indiana University, 1001 E. 3rd St., Jordan Hall A502, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA; 4University of Massachusetts Medical School, Program in Molecular Medicine, 373 Plantation St., Two Biotech, Suite 306, Worcester, MA 01605, USA. 5Corresponding authors.E-MAIL vrambros/at/gmail.com; FAX (508) 856-5657. 6E-MAIL nsokol/at/indiana.edu; FAX (812) 855-6082. Received March 10, 2008; Accepted April 11, 2008. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract The Drosophila let-7-Complex (let-7-C) is a polycistronic locus encoding three ancient microRNAs: let-7, miR-100, and fly lin-4 (miR-125). We find that the let-7-C locus is principally expressed in the pupal and adult neuromusculature. let-7-C knockout flies appear normal externally but display defects in adult behaviors (e.g., flight, motility, and fertility) as well as clear juvenile features in their neuromusculature. We find that the function of let-7-C to ensure the appropriate remodeling of the abdominal neuromusculature during the larval-to-adult transition is carried out predominantly by let-7 alone. This heterochronic role of let-7 is likely just one of the ways in which let-7-C promotes adult behavior. Keywords: let-7, let-7-Complex, microRNA, heterochronic, developmental timing, neuromuscular junction Mutations in heterochronic genes in Caenorhabditis elegans cause cells in particular lineages to express their stage-specific fates earlier or later than normal (Ambros and Horvitz 1984). Detailed analysis of these genes has revealed a regulatory pathway of heterochronic genes that specifies the timing of cellular development in diverse cell types and thereby ensures a coordinated schedule of developmental events throughout the worm (for review, see Rougvie 2005; Moss 2007). The existence of the heterochronic gene pathway in worms and the conservation of some of its components through animal evolution suggest that functionally analogous pathways could also coordinate developmental timing in higher organisms (Pasquinelli et al. 2000). Two of these highly conserved components of the heterochronic pathway, let-7 and lin-4, are microRNAs (miRNAs), a class of small RNAs that post-transcriptionally modulate the expression of target transcripts (for review, see Jackson and Standart 2007). The sequences and developmentally regulated expression profiles of let-7 and lin-4 are conserved among diverse bilaterians (Pasquinelli et al. 2000; Sempere et al. 2003). For example, Drosophila let-7 and miR-125 (fly lin-4) are robustly up-regulated during metamorphosis, as is another highly conserved miRNA, miR-100 (Pasquinelli et al. 2000; Sempere et al. 2002, 2003; Bashirullah et al. 2003). All three of these ancient miRNAs are encoded in a 1-kb region of the Drosophila genome (Fig. 1
Results and Discussion The clustered organization of Drosophila miR-100, let-7, and miR-125 suggests that these miRNAs are co-transcribed as a single polycistronic transcript. To test this hypothesis, we isolated cDNAs generated from genomic regions between miR-100 and let-7 and between let-7 and miR-125 using 5′ and 3′ rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE). This analysis identified two overlapping cDNA fragments that corresponded to a 2435-nucleotide (nt) primary transcript that encoded the ~70-nt hairpin sequences of miR-100, let-7, and miR-125, and was comprised of three exons that spanned 17,400 kb of genomic DNA (Fig. 1A To investigate whether let-7-C miRNAs collectively regulate developmental timing in Drosophila, we generated two independent let-7-C knockout strains, let-7-CKO1 and let-7-CGKI (Fig. 1B,C
To test whether the activity of each of the let-7-C miRNAs is required for let-7-C function, we analyzed the phenotypes of three different let-7-C derivative strains in which the expression of miR-100, let-7, or miR-125 had been eliminated individually (Fig. 1C To identify the specific place where let-7-C miRNAs may function to promote adult behavior, we examined the spatiotemporal expression pattern of the let-7-C locus. We used the let-7-CGKI strain, in which the yeast transcriptional activator Gal4 had been inserted into the let-7-C locus (Fig. 1B Gal4 insertion restored miR-100, let-7, and miR-125 expression (Fig. 1D Gal4 expression pattern are outlined below. First, let-7-C Gal4 was expressed in neurons throughout the adult brain and ventral nerve cord, and this adult CNS expression was the culmination of a dramatic expansion in the spatial expression pattern of let-7-C Gal4 that occurred in the CNS during the first half of metamorphosis (Fig. 3B Gal4 was expressed in neurons that innervated structures throughout the adult (Fig. 3C Gal4 was very densely expressed in the posterior tip of the adult abdominal ganglion (Fig. 3B Gal4 was not only expressed in motoneurons but in muscle cells as well, including the DIOMs and DMs (Fig. 3E Gal4 in pupal and adult neurons and muscles is consistent with the hypothesis that the behavioral phenotypes of let-7-C mutant adults are the consequence of defects in the metamorphosis of the neuromusculature.
To test whether let-7-C miRNAs play a role in specifying the configuration of the adult neuromusculature, we examined the abdominal muscle system of let-7-CKO1/GKI mutants since, as shown above, let-7-C is expressed in abdominal motoneurons and muscles. We found two very clear and highly penetrant defects (Fig. 4A,B
To test whether let-7-C affects the remodeling of other internal tissues, we examined the morphogenesis of the CNS during metamorphosis in let-7-CKO1/GKI mutants and found that at a gross level, CNS development appeared to have proceeded normally (data not shown). To examine the results of nervous system remodeling in finer detail, we focused on the morphology of motoneurons that innervate the DIOMs or the DMs. DIOMs are innervated by DIOM motoneurons, which also degenerate after eclosion. The DIOMs and their DIOM motoneurons, however, are triggered to die at different times and therefore may be controlled by independent signals (Kimura and Truman 1990). Interestingly, we found that the neuromuscular junctions (NMJs) connecting DIOMs and their innervating motoneurons failed to decay in let-7-CKO1/GKI mutant adults (Fig. 4 E,F We note the striking similarity between let-7-CKO1/GKI mutant phenotypes and the phenotypes associated with manual denervation of abdominal muscles prior to metamorphosis, reported by Currie and Bate in 1995. In both cases, adult DM muscles fail to grow to wild-type width, contain fewer nuclei, and display aberrant NMJs. However, the let-7-C mutation and denervation differ in at least one respect: their effect on the male-specific muscle of Lawrence (MOL) (Lawrence and Johnston 1986). MOLs are present in let-7-CKO1/GKI adult males but absent in manually denervated adult males (Supplemental Fig. S5; Currie and Bate 1995). Interestingly, Currie and Bate did not report the persistence of DIOMs in denervated adults, which could mean either that DIOM degeneration is unaffected by denervation or that DIOMs degenerate precociously when denervated and were therefore not observed. In either case, the overall similarity between the effects of genetic depletion of let-7-C and muscle denervation during metamorphosis supports the hypothesis that let-7-C is required to regulate an interaction between muscles and motoneurons during neuromusculature remodeling.
To test whether the activities of miR-100, let-7, or miR-125 are required individually for neuromusculature remodeling, we examined the abdominal muscle pattern as well as DM NMJs in miR-100Δ, let-7Δ, and miR-125Δ single mutants (Fig. 5). We found that 2-d-old miR-100Δ (n = 6) and miR-125Δ (n = 7) males retained none of the six DIOMs, while let-7Δ males (n = 7) retained 61% ± 28.5% of DIOMs. Although the frequency of complete DIOM retention is lower in let-7Δ mutants compared to let-7-CKO1/GKI mutants, we noted that 83% ± 25% of let-7Δ mutant DIOMs had arrested at some stage in the process of degeneration. With respect to both the DM and DM NMJ phenotype, we similarly found that miR-100Δ (n = 5) and miR-125Δ (n = 6) mutants appeared normal, whereas let-7Δ mutants (n = 6) phenocopied let-7-CKO1/GKI mutants. miR-100Δ and miR-125Δ DMs were 18.3 ± 0.8 μm and 16.8 ± 0.8 μm in width, respectively, while let-7Δ DMs were 12 ± 1.8 μm in length (Fig. 5A–C). Similarly, miR-100Δ and miR-125Δ NMJs were 45.9 ± 10.2 μm and 55.1 ± 13.3 μm in length, respectively, while let-7Δ NMJs were 12.5 ± 5 μm in length (Fig. 5D,E). For the sake of consistency, all the morphological data quantified in this study were collected from adult males. However, let-7-CKO1/GKI and let-7Δ mutant females exhibited DM and DIOM phenotypes identical to their male siblings (data not shown), suggesting that the reduced egg-laying displayed by let-7Δ mutant females (Fig. 2F The functional dissection of Drosophila let-7-C presented here indicates that let-7-C is required for adult behavior and that defects in neuromusculature remodeling correlate with some aspects of this requirement. We note that the perdurance of juvenile features in adult Drosophila let-7 mutants is analogous to the reiteration of larval cell fates in adult Caenorhabditis elegans let-7 mutants (Reinhart et al. 2000), confirming the suggestion by Pasquinelli et al. in 2000 that let-7 might control developmental transitions in diverse bilateria (Pasquinelli et al. 2000). Future work in flies should extend this analysis to identify the relevant mRNA targets that Drosophila let-7 regulates in its heterochronic role and to examine how this heterochronic function is integrated into the more general requirements of the let-7-C locus in promoting adult behavior. For the most part, the set of targets predicted for Drosophila let-7 are distinct from those predicted for C. elegans let-7 (Grun et al. 2005; Lall et al. 2006). Our unpublished observations indicate that one of Drosophila let-7’s targets is the transcription factor abrupt (Hu et al. 1995), although we also find that ectopic expression of abrupt in a let-7-C Gal4-driven pattern is not sufficient to recapitulate the let-7Δ phenotype. The conservation of the genomic clustering as well as neuronal expression of let-7, mir-125, and mir-100 from flies to vertebrates (Supplemental Fig. S1; Wienholds et al. 2005; Ason et al. 2006; Wulczyn et al. 2007) suggests that let-7-C loci could function in neuromuscular and/or neuronal remodeling in mammals. Future work on let-7-C should reveal how its diverse effects on temporal cell fates, developmental timing, and neuronal remodeling are related.Materials and methods Drosophila strains and genetics Fly stocks were maintained at 25°C on standard media on a 12-h light, 12-h dark cycle. Canton S and/or w1118 stocks were used as wild-type controls. Transgenic animals were generated using standard methods. Detailed descriptions of methods used to generate let-7-C mutant flies can be found in the Supplemental Material. Histochemistry Adult brains or abdomens were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 1 h or 15 min, respectively. Samples were washed in PBT, blocked for 1 h with 5% goat serum in PBT, and incubated overnight with primary antibodies, including rabbit anti-GFP (1:1000; Molecular Probes), mouse anti-nc82 (1:10; Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank), mouse anti-22c10 (1:20; Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank), rabbit anti-twist (1:4000; Siegfried Roth), and rabbit anti-HRP (1:500; Jackson Laboratories). Samples were washed in PBT and incubated with AlexaFluor 488 or 568 conjugated anti-mouse or anti-rabbit secondary antibodies (Invitrogen) and/or additional stains, including rhodamine phalloidin (1:1000; Sigma), Cy5 conjugated anti-HRP antibodies (1:200; Jackson Labs), and DAPI (1:10,000; Molecular Probes). Samples were washed and mounted in Vectashield (Vector Laboratories). Images were collected on a Leica confocal microscope. The cDNA sequence of pri-let-7-C has been deposited in GenBank under accession number EU624487. Complete methods can be found in the Supplemental Material. Acknowledgments We thank the Developmental Studies Hybdridoma Bank, Yang Hong, and Jeff Sekelsky for reagents; members of the Ambros lab for illuminating discussions; and Yashi Ahmed and Claudio Pikielny for use of their fly room and injection facility. N.S.S. was supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the Damon Runyon Cancer Research Fund (1728-02) and an equipment grant from the Hitchcock Foundation. P.X. was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Health (RO1 NS40929) to Y.N.J., who is an HHMI investigator. The Drosophila project in V.A.’s lab was supported by a National Institute of Health grant (GM066826). Footnotes Supplemental material is available at http://www.genesdev.org. Article is online at http://www.genesdev.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gad.1671708. References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||
Science. 1984 Oct 26; 226(4673):409-16.
[Science. 1984]Development. 2005 Sep; 132(17):3787-98.
[Development. 2005]Curr Biol. 2007 Jun 5; 17(11):R425-34.
[Curr Biol. 2007]Nature. 2000 Nov 2; 408(6808):86-9.
[Nature. 2000]Sci STKE. 2007 Jan 2; 2007(367):re1.
[Sci STKE. 2007]Nature. 2000 Nov 2; 408(6808):86-9.
[Nature. 2000]FASEB J. 2007 Feb; 21(2):415-26.
[FASEB J. 2007]Science. 2008 Apr 4; 320(5872):97-100.
[Science. 2008]J Neurosci. 1990 Feb; 10(2):403-1.
[J Neurosci. 1990]Development. 1991 Sep; 113(1):91-102.
[Development. 1991]Development. 1995 Aug; 121(8):2549-57.
[Development. 1995]J Neurosci. 1990 Feb; 10(2):403-1.
[J Neurosci. 1990]Cell. 1986 May 23; 45(4):505-13.
[Cell. 1986]Development. 1995 Aug; 121(8):2549-57.
[Development. 1995]Nature. 2000 Feb 24; 403(6772):901-6.
[Nature. 2000]Nature. 2000 Nov 2; 408(6808):86-9.
[Nature. 2000]PLoS Comput Biol. 2005 Jun; 1(1):e13.
[PLoS Comput Biol. 2005]Curr Biol. 2006 Mar 7; 16(5):460-71.
[Curr Biol. 2006]Science. 2005 Jul 8; 309(5732):310-1.
[Science. 2005]