pmc logo image
Logo of aemFormerly Appl MicrobiolAppl Environ Microbiol SubscriptionsAppl Environ Microbiol Web Site

Formats:

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1984 September; 48(3): 639–646.
PMCID: PMC241579
High-Gravity Brewing: Effects of Nutrition on Yeast Composition, Fermentative Ability, and Alcohol Production
Gregory P. Casey, Carol A. Magnus, and W. M. Ingledew*
Department of Applied Microbiology and Food Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada S7N 0W0
* Corresponding author.
Abstract
A number of economic and product quality advantages exist in brewing when high-gravity worts of 16 to 18% dissolved solids are fermented. Above this level, production problems such as slow or stuck fermentations and poor yeast viability occur. Ethanol toxicity has been cited as the main cause, as brewers' yeasts are reported to tolerate only 7 to 9% (vol/vol) ethanol. The inhibitory effect of high osmotic pressure has also been implicated. In this report, it is demonstrated that the factor limiting the production of high levels of ethanol by brewing yeasts is actually a nutritional deficiency. When a nitrogen source, ergosterol, and oleic acid are added to worts up to 31% dissolved solids, it is possible to produce beers up to 16.2% (vol/vol) ethanol. Yeast viability remains high, and the yeasts can be repitched at least five times. Supplementation does not increase the fermentative tolerance of the yeasts to ethanol but increases the length and level of new yeast cell mass synthesis over that seen in unsupplemented wort (and therefore the period of more rapid wort attenuation). Glycogen, protein, and sterol levels in yeasts were examined, as was the importance of pitching rate, temperature, and degree of anaerobiosis. The ethanol tolerance of brewers' yeast is suggested to be no different than that of sake or distillers' yeast.
Full text
Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (1.4M), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • ANDREASEN AA, STIER TJB. Anaerobic nutrition of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. I. Ergosterol requirement for growth in a defined medium. J Cell Physiol. 1953 Feb;41(1):23–36. [PubMed]
  • ANDREASEN AA, STIER TJ. Anaerobic nutrition of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. II. Unsaturated fatty acid requirement for growth in a defined medium. J Cell Physiol. 1954 Jun;43(3):271–281. [PubMed]
  • Gray WD. Studies on the Alcohol Tolerance of Yeasts. J Bacteriol. 1941 Nov;42(5):561–574. [PubMed]
  • LOWRY OH, ROSEBROUGH NJ, FARR AL, RANDALL RJ. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951 Nov;193(1):265–275. [PubMed]
  • Nagodawithana TW, Castellano C, Steinkraus KH. Effect of dissolved oxygen, temperature, initial cell count, and sugar concentration on the viability of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in rapid fermentations. Appl Microbiol. 1974 Sep;28(3):383–391. [PubMed]
  • Navarro JM, Finck JD. Evolution de l'activite 'hexokinase' de Saccharomyces uvarum fermentant le saccharose. Cell Mol Biol. 1982;28(1):85–89. [PubMed]
  • Patel Girishchandra B, Ingledew W Michael. Trends in Wort Carbohydrate Utilization. Appl Microbiol. 1973 Sep;26(3):349–353. [PubMed]
  • Rattray JB, Schibeci A, Kidby DK. Lipids of yeasts. Bacteriol Rev. 1975 Sep;39(3):197–231. [PubMed]
  • van Uden N, da Cruz Duarte H. Effects of ethanol on the temperature profile of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Z Allg Mikrobiol. 1981;21(10):743–750. [PubMed]