• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of pnasPNASInfo for AuthorsSubscriptionsAboutThis Article
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Nov 23, 1999; 96(24): 13863–13868.

Intracellular gene transfer in action: Dual transcription and multiple silencings of nuclear and mitochondrial cox2 genes in legumes


The respiratory gene cox2, normally present in the mitochondrion, was previously shown to have been functionally transferred to the nucleus during flowering plant evolution, possibly during the diversification of legumes. To search for novel intermediate stages in the process of intracellular gene transfer and to assess the evolutionary timing and frequency of cox2 transfer, activation, and inactivation, we examined nuclear and mitochondrial (mt) cox2 presence and expression in over 25 legume genera and mt cox2 presence in 392 genera. Transfer and activation of cox2 appear to have occurred during recent legume evolution, more recently than previously inferred. Many intermediate stages of the gene transfer process are represented by cox2 genes in the studied legumes. Nine legumes contain intact copies of both nuclear and mt cox2, although transcripts could not be detected for some of these genes. Both cox2 genes are transcribed in seven legumes that are phylogenetically interspersed with species displaying only nuclear or mt cox2 expression. Inactivation of cox2 in each genome has taken place multiple times and in a variety of ways, including loss of detectable transcripts or transcript editing and partial to complete gene loss. Phylogenetic evidence shows about the same number (3–5) of separate inactivations of nuclear and mt cox2, suggesting that there is no selective advantage for a mt vs. nuclear location of cox2 in plants. The current distribution of cox2 presence and expression between the nucleus and mitochondrion in the studied legumes is probably the result of chance mutations silencing either cox2 gene.

Most genes encoding mitochondrial (mt) and chloroplast proteins are located in the nucleus, many of these having been transferred from the organellar genomes. Most of this intracellular gene transfer probably occurred early during organellar evolution (reviewed in ref. 1). A number of reports have shown that physical movement of organellar DNA to the nuclear genome is an ongoing process. Although numerous examples of gene fragments of organellar origin have been found in the nuclear genomes of a diverse range of eukaryotes (ref. 2 and references therein), few cases of recent gene transfers resulting in activation of the transferred gene have been documented. Most of these recent evolutionary transfers involve mt genes in plants (e.g., refs. 39); in contrast, the numerous sequenced mt genomes of animals all contain the same set of 13 (or occasionally 12) protein genes (10).

Previously characterized cases of gene transfer have revealed several intermediate stages in the process of intracellular gene transfer. In most cases, physical transfer of plant mt genes has been inferred to occur by an RNA intermediate because the nuclear copy resembles an edited mt mRNA rather than an unedited mt gene (e.g., refs. 35). Acquisition of regulatory elements and a mt targeting sequence is critical for nuclear gene activation. This has been inferred to have occurred by recombination with a duplicated targeting sequence from a preexisting nuclear gene encoding a mt protein (6), by alternative splicing of a targeting sequence shared with a preexisting mitochondrial-targeted gene (8, 9), and by exon shuffling from a nuclear gene encoding a cytosolic protein and gain of mt targeting function (11). After nuclear gene activation, both the nuclear and mt copies should be expressed, at least transiently, but no such examples have been reported previously in plants. Inactivation (silencing) and loss have been reported only for the organellar copy but not the nuclear copy, suggesting that inactivation of the organellar gene is favored.

The respiratory gene cox2, encoding subunit 2 of cytochrome oxidase, was functionally transferred to the nucleus during flowering plant evolution (3). Functional nuclear genes for cox2 have been characterized in two legumes, one of which (Vigna unguiculata; cowpea) lacks the gene in the mt genome and the other of which (Glycine max; soybean) retains an apparently silent copy in the mitochondrion (3, 4). The transfer of cox2 to the nucleus may be a relatively recent evolutionary event and provides an opportunity to identify and study additional intermediate stages of the transfer process by taking a comparative approach. In the current report, we document the first examples of inactivation of a once-active nuclear gene of recent organellar origin and of transcription of both nuclear and mt copies of a transferred gene in the same plant. We show that there have been about equal numbers of separate inactivations of nuclear and mt cox2 genes among the studied legumes, suggesting that there is no selective advantage for a mt or nuclear location of cox2 in plants.

Materials and Methods

For plant voucher information, see ref. 12; for complete genus and species names, see supplemental data on the PNAS web site, www.pnas.org. Total cellular DNA or RNA was extracted as described (12, 13); slot blot DNA hybridizations were performed as described (12). All RNAs were treated twice with RNase-free DNase (Promega) before reverse transcription and once before use in Northern hybridizations. Poly(A)+ and poly(A)− RNAs were fractionated by using the poly(A)Ttract kit (Promega). RNAs were electrophoresed through 1.0% gels containing formaldehyde and then were transferred to Immobilon (Millipore) membranes by standard blotting procedures. The membranes were prehybridized and hybridized at 58–68°C in 5× standard saline citrate (SSC), 0.1% SDS, 50 mM Tris (pH 8.0), 10 mM EDTA, 2× Denhardt’s solution, and 5% dextran sulfate (Pharmacia). After hybridization, filters were washed twice in 0.5% SDS and either 2×, 0.5×, or 0.25× SSC at the hybridization temperature. Hybridization probes were made by 32P-labeling using random oligonucleotide primers.

Nuclear and mt cox2 coding region sequences were isolated by PCR using various pairs of primers (see supplemental material at www.pnas.org). PCR was performed by using 20–50 ng of total cellular DNA in 10- to 50-μl reactions, with 0.8–1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM each dNTP, 2 μM of each primer, and Taq polymerase for 30–35 cycles using an Idaho air thermal cycler. Denaturation was at 92°C for 10 sec, annealing at 50–54°C for 20 sec, and extension at 72°C for 1–1.5 min. Reverse transcription was performed at 37°C for 60 min, using 1–2 μg of total cellular RNA, 200 units of Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY), 5 μM random hexamers, 2.5 mM each dNTP, and 20 units of RNasin (Promega). Controls with all reagents except reverse transcriptase were used to detect contaminating DNA. The cDNAs were treated with RNase A to remove residual RNA, and then PCR was performed as above. 5′ rapid amplification of cDNA ends was performed by using a gene-specific primer for reverse transcription, followed by addition of a poly(C) tail using polynucleotide kinase, and finally PCR using an anchor poly(G) forward primer and a gene-specific reverse primer. PCR and reverse transcription (RT)–PCR products were cloned by using the TA cloning kit (Invitrogen), or were sequenced directly, after gel purification using the GeneClean kit (Bio 101). Nucleotide sequences were determined for both strands using Applied Biosystems and Li-Cor (Lincoln, NE) automated DNA sequencers.


Mitochondrial cox2 Gene Losses in Legumes.

We began this study by searching for mt cox2 gene losses among legumes. Finding loss of mt cox2 in a certain species would suggest the presence of cox2 in the nucleus. A slot blot hybridization survey of total DNAs from 392 legume genera (listed in ref. 12) was performed to detect mt cox2 losses. After hybridization with a soybean mt cox2 probe, the blots were stripped and subsequently hybridized with a probe for cox1, a gene “universally” located in the mt genome, as a loading control. Comparison of the cox2 and cox1 hybridizations, taking into account unequal DNA loadings, revealed comparable levels of hybridization to most DNAs, a sampling of which are shown in Fig. Fig.1.1. However, hybridization of the cox2 probe was weaker than cox1 hybridization in three groups of legumes (Fig. (Fig.1):1): (i) many genera from the Phaseoleae subtribe Phaseolinae, (ii) all genera sampled from the tribe Psoraleeae, and (iii) some genera from the Phaseoleae subtribe Cajaninae. We infer that mt cox2 is partially to completely absent in each of these plants.

Figure 1
Presence of cox2 in mt DNA assayed by slot blot hybridization. Shown are hybridizations of mt cox2 and cox1 probes from soybean to 41 of 392 legume DNAs examined. Boxes designate legumes with diminished or undetectable cox2 hybridization relative to the ...

Hybridization of the cox2 probe to Phaseolus DNA was only slightly weaker than cox1 hybridization, suggesting that much of the cox2 gene is present. Efforts to PCR amplify the entire mt cox2 coding region from several species within the Phaseolinae (including Phaseolus; see next paragraph), Psoraleeae, and Cajaninae failed, further suggesting the lack of an intact gene. Based on phylogenetic criteria described later, it is likely that mt cox2 gene inactivation occurred independently during the evolution of the Phaseolinae, Psoraleeae, and Cajaninae. We were surprised by the small number of plants lacking an intact copy of mt cox2, and that they all belong to a single legume lineage (Phaseoleae and allies; ref. 14). However, the DNA hybridization surveys would not detect pseudogenes that are mostly intact, and thus there could be mt cox2 pseudogenes in other legumes.

Intact and Disrupted Nuclear and Mitochondrial cox2 Genes.

To search for previously undescribed intermediate stages of the gene transfer process, and to study the evolutionary dynamics of cox2 gene inactivation and loss, we isolated and sequenced mt and nuclear cox2 genes from a number of legumes within the Phaseoleae lineage and assayed transcription of each gene. The entire mt cox2 coding region was PCR-amplified, using primers located in the 5′ and 3′ untranslated regions, and was sequenced from 20 genera within the Phaseoleae lineage and 13 genera from related lineages that potentially contain an intact mt cox2 (as judged by DNA hybridization), to determine whether the genes are indeed intact or are disrupted by molecular lesions. The sequences from all examined species, except Erythrina, were completely intact. Erythrina mt cox2 contains a deletion of 5 bp, at positions 494 to 498 compared with soybean, that disrupts the reading frame. Attempts to isolate an entire mt cox2 gene from common bean failed. We were only able to isolate a 360-bp fragment at the 3′ end of cox2, suggesting that the gene is not intact; this result is consistent with the hybridization results in Fig. Fig.11 and shows that mt pseudogenes could be detected by the DNA hybridizations.

Nuclear cox2 genes and/or cDNAs were isolated and sequenced from 20 legume genera by PCR, RT-PCR, and 5′ rapid amplification of cDNA ends, using several primer combinations. All sequenced nuclear cox2 genes contain a mt targeting sequence that is homologous to the targeting sequences of nuclear cox2 from cowpea and soybean and of similar length to the soybean sequence (4). The cowpea targeting sequence is thus longer than previously reported (3). All examined nuclear cox2 genes also contain an intron located at an identical position between the transit peptide and mature coding regions of the gene. The size of this intron, although generally between 700 and 800 bp, ranged from 117 bp in Atylosia and Eriosema to ≈1,200 bp in Erythrina. Two copies of nuclear cox2 were discovered only in Erythrina, a polyploid genus.

Nuclear cox2 is intact in all but three studied legumes. There are insertions in the targeting sequence of nuclear cox2 in Cologania lemonii (4 bp) and Teramnus uncinatus (2 bp) that disrupt the reading frame. Nuclear cox2 in Pueraria phaseoloides contains a 22-bp deletion at the 5′ splice site of the intron, which probably disrupts splicing. Interestingly, Teramnus labialis and Pueraria lobata do not contain corresponding molecular lesions, suggesting that the insertion in T. uncinatus and deletion in P. phaseoloides occurred very recently.

We were unable to isolate nuclear cox2 sequences from any examined species outside the lineage containing Phaseoleae and allies and from four examined species within this lineage (Canavalia, Galactia, Tephrosia, and Clitoria), suggesting that these legumes may not contain nuclear cox2 (data not shown). Pea does not appear to contain a nuclear cox2, contrary to the previous inference based on Southern hybridization (3). However, we cannot rule out the possibility that a highly divergent nuclear cox2 gene fragment exists in pea or other legumes for which we were unable to isolate a nuclear cox2 gene.

Transcribed and Silenced Nuclear and Mitochondrial cox2 Genes.

Mt and nuclear cox2 transcription was assayed by a combination of RT-PCR and Northern hybridizations in 13 legumes that contain both cox2 genes. RT-PCR was particularly useful to detect transcripts present at low levels, but was not performed in a quantitative manner, whereas Northern hybridizations were useful to determine whether transcripts were abundant.

RT-PCR was performed by using multiple primer combinations to detect nuclear cox2 transcripts. In the first assay, the forward primer was located in the targeting sequence and the reverse primer was located within the mature coding region. Soybean was used as a positive control; nuclear cox2 in soybean was previously shown to be transcribed (3, 4). This assay produced nuclear cox2 cDNA fragments of 700–790 bp shown in all seven lanes of Fig. Fig.22A and also a 550 bp fragment from Amphicarpa (data not shown), with the sizes depending on the exact location of the primers and the lengths of insertions and deletions within the targeting sequence. These products are all of the correct size for spliced nuclear cox2 cDNAs from the respective legumes, and they were all sequenced to verify nuclear cox2 cDNA amplification from the correct species. In the second assay, RT-PCR was performed for six other species by using primer pairs that were located within the targeting sequence. Fig. Fig.22B shows that amplification of nuclear cox2 was successful in each case when DNA was used as the template, as indicated by the bands of ≈320–420 bp in each lane, but not when cDNA was used as template. The gel was blotted and hybridized to a cox2 probe to verify lack of cox2 amplification in lanes without bands (data not shown), and the PCR products were sequenced to verify their identity. Multiple independent RT-PCR reactions using varying amounts of cDNA template were performed to confirm the results. Mt cox2 and rps10 cDNAs were readily obtained from each species (see below), indicating that the reverse transcription reactions were successful. To confirm the lack of nuclear cox2 transcripts in leaves of the above six species, RT-PCR was also performed by using multiple reverse primers located in the mature coding region, but no nuclear cox2 cDNAs were amplified (data not shown). The results of the RT-PCR assays indicate that steady-state transcripts of nuclear cox2 are not present and suggest that the gene is not transcribed, in young leaves of Pachyrhizus, Calopogonium, Cologania, Pueraria, Pseudovigna, and Teramnus. Lack of detectable nuclear cox2 transcripts was further confirmed by Northern hybridizations using fractionated poly(A)+ and poly(A)− RNAs from Pueraria, Pachyrhizus, Teramnus, and Pseudovigna (data not shown).

Figure 2
Detection of mt and nuclear cox2 transcripts by RT-PCR. (A) Agarose gel showing RT-PCR products generated by using primers that amplify almost all of the nuclear cox2 targeting sequence plus about half of the mature coding region (700–790 bp). ...

Presence or absence of mt cox2 transcripts was assayed by using primers located in the 5′ and 3′ untranslated regions. Fig. Fig.22C shows that a band of ≈885 bp, the expected size for a mt cox2 cDNA, is present in all lanes except that of Cullen. Lack of mt cox2 cDNA amplification from Cullen is consistent with results of the slot blot DNA hybridizations showing partial to complete gene loss in each examined species within the Psoraleeae (Fig. (Fig.1).1). All of the mt cox2 RT-PCR products were cloned, and multiple clones were sequenced to verify cDNA amplification from the indicated species and to determine whether mt cox2 transcripts were properly edited. C-to-U RNA editing of transcripts from most plant mt protein genes is necessary to produce mRNAs that encode the correct amino acid sequence (reviewed in ref. 15). Transcripts of all examined species, except soybean, were C-to-U edited at 13–15 sites. In soybean, only one cDNA clone of seven sequenced showed any RNA editing, but at only two sites. These results indicate that mt cox2 is effectively a pseudogene in soybean, consistent with previous observations (3, 4), but is potentially functional in all other examined species with intact cox2 genes.

The abundance of mt cox2 transcripts was assayed by Northern blots. Total RNAs were hybridized at high stringency (68°C) with a mt cox2 cDNA probe and were washed at high stringency (68°C, 0.25× SSC) to detect only mt cox2 transcripts. Pea and mung bean were used as positive and negative controls, respectively. A mt cox2 cDNA probe hybridized strongly to transcripts of ≈1,200 bases from Dumasia, Pseudeminia, Teramnus, Pachyrhizus, Pseudovigna, and Cologania (Fig. (Fig.33A) and Calopogonium (not shown) whereas somewhat weaker hybridization was detected in the under-loaded pea and Amphicarpa lanes. We were surprised to find that the cox2 probe hybridized very weakly, if at all, to RNAs from Lespedeza, Erythrina, and Neonotonia because fully edited mt transcripts were detected by RT-PCR for all three species. A cox1 control probe hybridized well to all RNAs except Amphicarpa and pea (Fig. (Fig.33B), indicating that ample RNA was present in most lanes. Thus, mt cox2 transcripts are not very abundant in leaves of Lespedeza, Neonotonia, and Erythrina. Mt cox2 transcripts in Lespedeza and Neonotonia could potentially make functional proteins, but their low abundance suggests that most COX2 protein in leaf cells of these plants is produced from the nuclear cox2 gene.

Figure 3
Levels of cox2 transcripts as determined by Northern hybridizations. (A) High stringency hybridization of a mt cox2 cDNA probe from Amphicarpa to various total RNAs. (B) Rehybridization with a mt cox1 probe from soybean. (C) RNA gel used for hybridizations ...

Considering that mt cox2 is transcribed at low levels in Neonotonia and Lespedeza but at relatively high levels in Dumasia, Amphicarpa, and Pseudeminia, we wanted to determine whether nuclear cox2 transcripts in the latter three species are abundant. Cox2 transcription in Dumasia, Amphicarpa, and Pseudeminia was assayed by Northern hybridizations using fractionated poly(A)+ and poly(A)− RNAs. Most nuclear mRNAs are polyadenylated whereas most plant mt transcripts are not. A mt cox2 cDNA probe was used because it would be expected to bind approximately equally to nuclear cox2 transcripts from each species. This probe hybridized strongly to RNAs in all three Dumasia lanes, with hybridization in the poly(A)+ lane being stronger and the band being slightly larger than in the poly(A)− lane (Fig. (Fig.33D). An α-tubulin probe hybridized very strongly to the Dumasia poly(A)+ lane, showing that enriched poly(A)+ RNA is indeed present (Fig. (Fig.33E). Levels of contaminating poly(A)− RNA, and thus mt cox2 transcripts, are low in the Dumasia poly(A)+ RNA lane, as seen by the lack of rRNA bands on the ethidium bromide stained gel (Fig. (Fig.33C). The cox2 hybridization signal in the poly(A)+ lane of Dumasia must therefore reflect the presence of nuclear cox2 transcripts rather than contaminating mt transcripts. Thus, cox2 transcripts from both compartments are relatively abundant in Dumasia leaves. Hybridization of the cox2 probe was strong to total and poly(A)− RNAs from Amphicarpa and Pseudeminia but very weak to poly(A)+ RNAs despite strong hybridization of the α-tubulin probe to the poly(A)+ lanes (data not shown). Thus, nuclear cox2 transcripts are present at low levels in Amphicarpa and Pseudeminia.

To further examine the phylogenetic distribution of nuclear cox2 expression within the Phaseoleae lineage and related species, Northern blots were performed by using fractionated poly(A)+ and poly(A)− RNAs from Galactia, Canavalia, Clitoria, and Tephrosia (all part of the Phaseoleae lineage), along with Calpurnia and Crotalaria. Hybridization to the cox2 probe was seen only in poly(A)− lanes of each species, although there was strong hybridization of a probe for the nuclear glycine decarboxylase H-protein gene to all poly(A)+ lanes (data not shown). We infer that nuclear cox2 is not expressed and, based on PCR experiments discussed above, may be absent in these six legumes. Thus, nuclear cox2 expression appears to be restricted to a single group of legumes within the Phaseoleae lineage (14).


Intermediate Stages of Gene Transfer Represented by Legume cox2 Genes.

Through comparative study of cox2 gene presence and expression in legumes, we have caught a rare glimpse of the intracellular gene transfer process in action, an opportunity facilitated by the very recent evolutionary transfer of cox2 to the nucleus. A wide range of intermediate stages in the gene transfer process is represented by nuclear and mt cox2 genes in the studied legumes (Fig. (Fig.4).4). The physical transfer of mt cox2 to the nuclear genome involved an edited RNA intermediate, although the cellular location of the reverse transcription step is unknown (3, 4). All of the many nuclear cox2 genes examined in this study contain a homologous intron located at the same position between the (also homologous) targeting sequence and the mature coding region of the gene; this is consistent with the earlier suggestion (3) that the transferred gene was activated by an exon-shuffling-like process, obtaining its mt targeting sequence and regulatory elements from another, as yet uncharacterized gene.

Figure 4
A model of the intermediate stages of gene transfer represented by nuclear and mt cox2 in different legumes. Disrupted or fragmented cox2 genes are indicated by a shorter double helix compared with intact genes. Transcription is signified by an arrow ...

Once nuclear cox2 was activated, a state of dual intact and transcribed cox2 genes was established; this is a relictual stage that persists in only five, phylogenetically scattered legumes (Fig. (Fig.5)5) of the many examined in this study. Dual transcription of intact genes in both the nucleus and an organelle has been reported only for atp9 in Neurospora crassa (16). Nuclear and mt cox2 transcripts are both abundant in Dumasia, and it is entirely possible that both transcripts are expressed as proteins, perhaps making the genes functionally redundant. In contrast, transcript levels for either mt or nuclear cox2 are very low in leaves of Lespedeza, Neonotonia, Amphicarpa, and Pseudeminia. One of the cox2 genes in each of these four species may be in the process of being silenced. Alternatively, the cox2 transcripts that are present in low levels in leaves may be present at high levels in other tissues, organs, or developmental stages in these plants; such differential expression could provide a selective rationale for retaining active copies of both genes.

Figure 5
Summary of cox2 gene distribution and transcript data in a phylogenetic context. The left two columns indicate the presence (+) or absence (−) of an intact cox2 gene in the mitochondrion (mt) or nucleus (nuc) of the indicated species. ...

Inactivation (silencing) of either nuclear or mt cox2 has occurred multiple times and in a variety of ways (Fig. (Fig.4).4). We have grouped the types of inactivation into two classes: “DNA level” inactivation refers to genes containing mutations within the exons or introns that disrupt the reading frame or intron splicing. “RNA level” inactivation refers to lack of detectable steady-state transcripts or of RNA editing and may reflect mutations in either cox2 regulatory elements or mutations that disrupt trans-acting factors necessary for proper gene expression. DNA, but not RNA, level inactivation (i.e., a transcribed pseudogene) is exemplified by mt cox2 in Erythrina. RNA, but not DNA, level inactivation (i.e., a silent intact gene) is represented by nuclear cox2 in Pachyrhizus, Calopogonium, and Pseudovigna, at least in young leaves. Silencing at the level of RNA processing is exemplified by mt cox2 in soybean, whose transcripts are virtually unedited, rendering them unable to produce a functional protein. Inactivation at both the DNA and RNA levels (i.e., a silent pseudogene) is represented by nuclear cox2 in Cologania lemonii, Pueraria phaseoloides, and Teramnus uncinatus, and mt cox2 in common bean. The final step in the gene transfer process, complete gene loss, is exemplified by mt cox2 in cowpea and mung bean (3), along with most other surveyed members of the genus Vigna and four Phaseolus species (data not shown).

A necessary limitation of this study, given its broad phylogenetic scope, is that transcription was assayed primarily in young green leaves. To look for cases of differential expression of cox2 genes, we have initiated a study to examine other tissues, organs, and developmental stages of a few legumes having intact copies of the cox2 gene in both compartments. Soybean mt cox2 transcripts are not detected by Northern hybridizations, and thus are not abundant, in hypocotyls, flowers, roots, apical meristems, primary leaves, and three ages of secondary leaves (data not shown). Thus, it is unlikely that differential expression occurs in soybean.

Timing of cox2 Transfer and Activation in the Nucleus.

Three lines of evidence suggest that cox2 gene transfer occurred once during the recent evolution of the legume subfamily Papilionoideae, probably during the evolution of the Phaseoleae lineage (Fig. (Fig.5).5). First, DNA hybridizations of 392 legume genera revealed mt cox2 losses in only three groups, all belonging to a single lineage (Phaseoleae and allies). Second, we were unable to isolate nuclear cox2 sequences from any species outside the Phaseoleae lineage and from four examined species that are basal within the Phaseoleae lineage (Canavalia, Galactia, Tephrosia, and Clitoria). Those species found to contain nuclear cox2 are all members of a well supported monophyletic group (79–96% bootstrap support; see Fig. Fig.55 and supplemental material at www.pnas.org). Third, Northern hybridizations and RT-PCR experiments indicated that nuclear cox2 expression appears to be restricted to a subset of species within the Phaseoleae lineage. Taken together, these data suggest that transfer of cox2 occurred much more recently than previously inferred (3, 17). We attribute these previous, seemingly erroneous inferences to phylogenetic artifacts (long branches going deep) stemming from the ≈10-fold higher mutation rate (18) of nuclear cox2 compared with mt cox2. The last common ancestor of all legumes known to have nuclear cox2 also had an “active” nuclear cox2 gene (i.e., gene transfer and activation are phylogenetically coincident among the studied legumes; Fig. Fig.5).5). Therefore, it is likely that nuclear cox2 activation occurred soon after transfer, before the initially inactive nuclear gene could accumulate mutations that would cause it to encode a nonfunctional protein product.

Multiple Inactivations of Both Mitochondrial and Nuclear cox2.

We placed the cox2 presence/absence and expression data in a phylogenetic context to infer the number of losses and silencings of mt and nuclear cox2 that have occurred among the studied legumes. Based on phylogenetic evidence (Fig. (Fig.5;5; supplemental material at www.pnas.org), we infer that mt cox2 has been silenced approximately four times during the evolution of the studied legumes. The 5-bp deletion in mt cox2 of Erythrina could be independent of the partial-to-complete gene loss in Atylosia and Eriosema; conversely, the mt cox2 loss in the Psoraleeae could be the result of the same inactivation event as for soybean, given the low bootstrap support for soybean grouping with Neonotonia, Amphicarpa, and Teramnus (see supplemental material). Although other examples of silencing and partial-to-complete loss of the mt gene after gene transfer have been reported (e.g., refs. 3, 5, and 7), all have been restricted to one loss per transfer event.

We were surprised to discover that nuclear cox2 has also been inactivated several times. Five separate inactivations are inferred in Fig. Fig.5.5. An unlikely alternative is that nuclear cox2 was reactivated in Pseudeminia after inactivation in a common ancestor of Pseudeminia, Cologania, Pueraria, and Pseudovigna; this would call for fewer inactivations. Overall, both nuclear and mt cox2 appear to have been silenced from three to five times among the studied legumes, and nuclear cox2 might have been reactivated once.

Our finding of inactivation of a previously active nuclear copy of a recently transferred gene establishes that either copy of a gene can be inactivated after the intermediate stage of dual expression, consistent with the gene transfer ratchet model recently proposed by Doolittle (19). Why have all previously reported gene inactivations, after recent gene transfer and nuclear activation, been restricted to the mt copy? Most examples of recent gene transfers were discovered by finding a disrupted or missing mt gene in one plant, or by obtaining a nuclear sequence from one plant, and then studying the functional nuclear copy of this gene from the same plant only. A comparative phylogenetic approach might reveal that the nuclear copy of other recently transferred organelle genes has become inactivated in one or more species related to the single plant studied so far.

Selection, Chance, and Directionality of Gene Transfer.

Previous hypotheses have proposed selective advantages for organelle genes to be relocated to the nucleus. One proposed advantage is the release from the effects of Muller’s ratchet, the accumulation of deleterious mutations, and increased genetic load within asexual populations, attributable to the lack of recombination (20). Evidence for Muller’s ratchet can been seen in the tRNAs of animal mt genomes (21). However, the much lower mutation rate in plant organelle genomes than in the nuclear genome (18) would seem to mitigate, if not entirely offset, the effects of Muller’s ratchet (20). Other proposed selective advantages of organelle genes being encoded in the nucleus include relief from free-radical induced mutations (22), which again seems unlikely for plants with their low organellar mutation rates, and improved regulatory control in the nucleus (23).

Finding multiple inactivations of nuclear and mt cox2 suggests that there is no selective advantage for COX2 to be encoded in the nucleus versus the mitochondrion in plants. We surmise that a state of functional redundancy was established once nuclear cox2 became expressed, such that the current distribution of the cox2 gene and its expression among legumes is largely the result of chance mutations silencing one cox2 gene or the other. Perhaps there is no selective advantage for other mt genes to be transferred to the nucleus in plants and other eukaryotes. Alternatively, there may be selective advantages for some mt genes, but not others, to be transferred to the nucleus. Also, selective pressures to relocate genes may have changed over time. For instance, Cavalier-Smith (24) has speculated that selection for organellar economy and efficiency was a major force driving the massive transfer of genes early in organellar evolution but became unimportant once organellar genomes were stripped of most of their genes.

We are left with a paradox: For cox2, at least, there seem to be no selective forces determining which compartment’s gene is silenced and which is retained. Yet, over time it is clear that gene transfer has occurred in a pervasively unidirectional manner, from organelles to the nucleus, possibly according to the gene transfer ratchet model of Doolittle (19). Perhaps the unidirectional flow of genes to the nucleus is largely neutral, driven by mechanistic forces such as the general propensity for organellar DNA to escape from the organelle and be taken up by the nucleus. In this regard, it is notable that experimental studies in yeast have shown remarkably high rates (≈2 × 10−5 per cell per generation) of “escape” of engineered plasmids from the mitochondrion to the nucleus, with the reverse process being undetectable (23, 25). In conclusion, functional gene transfer has been strikingly unidirectional; why this is so is unclear, and mechanistic rather than selective pressures may be of primary importance.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Data:


We thank H. Deiderick, W. Fischer, and P. Keeling for critical reading of the manuscript and E. O’Reilly for amplifying and sequencing mt cox2 from common bean. This work was supported by U.S. Department of Agriculture National Needs Fellowship 95-38420-2214 to K.L.A., National Science Foundation Grant DEB-9614984 to J.J.D., and National Institutes of Health Grant R01 GM-35087 to J.D.P.


reverse transcription


1. Gray M W. Int Rev Cytol. 1992;141:233–357. [PubMed]
2. Blanchard J L, Schmidt G W. J Mol Evol. 1995;41:397–406. [PubMed]
3. Nugent J M, Palmer J D. Cell. 1991;66:473–481. [PubMed]
4. Covello P S, Gray M W. EMBO J. 1992;22:3815–3820. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
5. Wischmann C, Schuster W. FEBS Lett. 1995;375:152–156. [PubMed]
6. Kadowaki K, Kubo N, Ozawa K, Hirai A. EMBO J. 1996;15:6652–6661. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Sanchez H, Fester T, Kloska S, Schroder W, Schuster W. EMBO J. 1996;15:2138–2149. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. Figueroa P, Gómez I, Holuigue L, Araya A, Jordana X. Plant J. 1999;18:601–609. [PubMed]
9. Kubo N, Harada K, Hirai A, Kadowaki K. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:9207–9211. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. Beagley C T, Okimoto R, Wolstenholme D R. Genetics. 1998;148:1091–1108. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Long M, de Souza S, J, Rosenberg C, Gilbert W. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:7727–7731. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Doyle J J, Doyle J L, Palmer J D. Syst Bot. 1995;20:272–294.
13. Schultz D J, Craig R, Cox-Foster D L, Mumma R O, Medford J I. Plant Mol Biol Rep. 1994;12:310–316.
14. Doyle J J, Doyle J L, Ballenger J A, Dickson E E, Kajita T, Ohashi T. Am J Bot. 1997;84:541–554. [PubMed]
15. Maier R M, Zeltz P, Kössel H, Bonnard G, Gualberto J M, Grienenberger J M. Plant Mol Biol. 1996;32:343–365. [PubMed]
16. Bittner-Eddy P, Monroy A F, Brambl R. J Mol Biol. 1994;235:881–897. [PubMed]
17. Laroche J, Li P, Maggia L, Bousquet J. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:5722–5727. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Wolfe K H, Li W-H, Sharp P M. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1987;84:9054–9058. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Doolittle W F. Trends Genet. 1998;14:307–311. [PubMed]
20. Martin W, Herrmann R G. Plant Physiol. 1998;118:9–17. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Lynch M. Mol Biol Evol. 1996;13:209–220. [PubMed]
22. Allen J F, Raven J A. J Mol Evol. 1996;42:482–492. [PubMed]
23. Thorsness P E, Weber E R. Int Rev Cytol. 1996;165:207–233. [PubMed]
24. Cavalier-Smith T. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1987;503:55–71. [PubMed]
25. Thorsness P E, Fox T D. Nature (London) 1990;346:376–379. [PubMed]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences
PubReader format: click here to try


Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...


Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...