![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
A conserved poxvirus NLPC/P60 superfamily protein contributes to vaccinia virus virulence in mice but not to replication in cell culture aLaboratory of Viral Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA bNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD 20894 *Corresponding author. E-mail address: bmoss/at/nih.gov Abstract Of the vaccinia virus genes that are conserved in all sequenced poxviruses, each one except for VACWR084 (G6R) has been at least partially characterized. The poxvirus protein encoded by G6R belongs to the NLPC/P60 superfamily, which consists of proteins with a papain-like fold and known or predicted protease, amidase or acyltransferase activity. The G6 protein was synthesized late in infection and localized to the interior of virions, primarily between the membrane and core. Unlike other conserved poxvirus genes, G6R was not required for virus propagation and spread in a variety of cells. Nevertheless, G6R null mutants caused less severe disease in mice than the parent or revertant virus. Moreover, mutation of the predicted catalytic cysteine led to the same level of attenuation as a null mutant, suggesting that the G6 protein has enzymatic activity that is important in vivo. Conservation of G6R amongst poxviruses and the disparity between its role in vitro and in vivo imply that the protein is involved in an aspect of the virus-host interaction that is common to vertebrates and insects. Introduction The Poxviridae comprise a large family of complex DNA viruses that replicate in the cytoplasm of a variety of animals from insects to mammals (Moss, 2007). The insect poxviruses differ from vertebrate poxviruses in many aspects of their biology and genome organization. Accordingly, Poxviridae are classified into two subfamilies: Chordopoxvirinae and Entomopoxvirinae. Currently, each of the 8 genera of chordopoxviruses is represented by one or more complete genome sequences, and two genome sequences of entomopoxviruses are available as well (www.poxvirus.org). Comparison of multiple complete poxvirus genome sequences delineated ~ 100 genes that are conserved in all chordopoxviruses and a subset of the latter (~ 50) also present in entomopoxviruses, of which some are even found in other nucleo-cytoplasmic large DNA viruses (Iyer et al., 2006; Upton et al., 2003). The remaining genes (~ 100) are specific for different genera or even species of poxviruses. There is a major functional distinction between the conserved and the genus/species-specific genes of poxviruses. The conserved genes show a strong tendency to be “essential”, i.e., the corresponding knockout mutants are non-viable in cell culture. By contrast, the non-conserved genes are mostly non-essential, i.e., are not required for virus replication in at least some cell lines but contribute to virus-host interactions and virulence. Investigations of the functions of conserved genes have yielded an outline of the poxvirus reproductive cycle. With only a single exception, those genes that are shared by all poxviruses have been functionally characterized (albeit at widely varying level of detail) in vaccinia virus (VACV), the best-studied member of the family. The only gene in this category that remains a complete unknown corresponds to the prototype Western Reserve (WR) strain of VACV gene VACWR084 (henceforth called G6R based on the designation adopted for the Copenhagen strain of VACV (Goebel et al., 1990). An unexpected hint as to the possible activity of the protein (referred to as G6) came from another field of research. As part of a comprehensive computational analysis of proteins involved in bacterial cell-wall biogenesis and degradation, it has been shown that G6 and its orthologs from other poxviruses form a distinct family within the NlpC/P60 superfamily of known and predicted enzymes (Anantharaman and Aravind, 2003). The NlpC/P60 superfamily is extremely diverse at the sequence and taxonomic levels and includes proteins from bacteria, archaea, bacteriophages, eukaryotes, and their viruses. Most of the proteins of this superfamily have not been experimentally characterized but several are known to function as peptidases, amidases or acyltransferases. Secondary structure prediction and identification of conserved motifs containing invariant cysteine and histidine residues has led to the identification of a putative papain-like fold with a catalytic Cys-His dyad in these proteins (Anantharaman and Aravind, 2003). Considering this prediction and the inherent interest in the only remaining uncharacterized conserved protein for poxvirus biology, we set out to characterize the role of the G6 protein in virus reproduction. Results G6 is conserved in all poxviruses and belongs to the NlpC/P60 superfamily of enzymes with a circular permutation of the predicted catalytic domain The VACV G6R open reading frame encodes a protein of 165 amino acids (18.9-kDa), which is conserved in all poxvirus genomes sequenced to date (www.poxvirus.org). The alignment of poxvirus orthologs of the G6 protein shows the conservation of several distinct motifs including two that center at invariant His and Cys residues (Fig. 1
Unexpectedly, the sequences of G6 and its orthologs in other poxviruses showed by far the greatest sequence similarity with a group of bacterial permuted NlpC/P60 proteins as opposed to eukaryotic members of this group (Fig. 1 Another notable feature of poxvirus orthologs of G6 is the conservation of an additional Cys located 7 amino acids downstream of the first in seven genera of chordopoxviruses, with a replacement by Ser in capripoxviruses and entomopoxviruses. This second Cys is also present in many other sequences of permuted NlpC/P60 proteins (Fig. 1 G6 is synthesized after viral DNA replication and is incorporated into the virion To establish that the G6 protein is expressed and determine the kinetics of G6 accumulation during the virus life cycle, we constructed a recombinant VACV in which the G6R gene remained under the control of its native promoter and DNA encoding a V5 epitope tag replaced the last eleven G6R codons, which are not highly conserved. This construction also included the enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) gene under control of the VACV late P11 promoter downstream of the modified G6R gene to allow screening for recombinant virus plaques (Fig. 2A
Localization of G6 in the virus particle The pattern of extraction of proteins from VACV virions with detergents typically correlates with their localization on the surface or interior of the virus particle. Fig. 3
The localization of G6-V5 in the virus particle was further investigated by electron microscopy with anti-V5 antibody and protein A conjugated to gold spheres. There was no staining of cell organelles (not shown). Gold particles were associated with the interior of immature virus particles (Fig. 4A
G6 is not required for virus growth in cell culture The conservation of G6 in all poxviruses suggested an essential role in virus reproduction. To investigate the function of G6 protein in the virus life cycle, we used a strategy for making conditionally lethal mutants that is applicable to VACV late genes (Senkevich et al., 2000; Zhang and Moss, 1991). A recombinant VACV (vG6i) was constructed in which transcription of the G6R gene was placed under control of a bacteriophage T7 promoter and was regulated by the Escherichia coli lac operator system and T7 RNA polymerase. This mutant could express detectable amounts of V5-tagged G6 only in the presence of inducer IPTG. Unexpectedly, vG6i plaque formation did not show dependence on the inducer (not shown). Similar results were obtained with several other recombinant viruses with different orientations of G6R regulated by E. coli lac operator, suggesting that the G6 protein is not essential for virus reproduction or that extremely low levels suffice. To distinguish between the above possibilities, we attempted to replace the G6R gene except for the last 33 bp, which overlaps the adjacent G7L gene, with the gene encoding EGFP under control of the VACV early-late synthetic promoter (Chakrabarti et al., 1997), by homologous recombination. EGFP provided the ability to screen even for very small recombinant virus plaques by fluorescence microscopy and has advantages over antibiotic selection (Da Fonseca and Moss 2003). If G6R were essential, we should not be able to isolate such a recombinant virus. However, green plaques were readily detected and the virus was clonally purified. DNA sequencing confirmed that the recombinant virus, vΔG6 (Table 1), retained only the expected last 33 bp of the G6R ORF. Neither the virus yield nor the plaque size of the recombinant virus was impaired in BS-C-1 cells compared to the wild type virus. In an attempt to detect even a slight difference in the replication of vΔG6 and wild type virus, we infected BS-C-1 cells with only 10−4 PFU/cell and monitored the growth of viruses over multiple cycles for 6 days. Again, however, no difference was observed (Fig. 5
We then attempted to find a cell line or a primary cell culture that would be less permissive for the vΔG6. Eight different cultures were tested (Table 2) and some impairment of vΔG6 growth was detected only in primary chick embryo fibroblasts (CEF). In this culture, the mutant virus produced 3–5 fold fewer plaques of smaller size than in other cultures (Fig. 6
G6 is important for VACV virulence in mice When administered intranasally, the WR strain of VACV causes weight loss and death in BALB/c mice primarily due to pneumonia (Law et al., 2005; Williamson et al., 1990). Here we compared virulence of 5 viruses (Table 1): VACV WR, vG6-rev, vG6-V5 (not containing EGFP), vG6/C-S, and two independent isolates of vG6− (vG6−1 and vG6−2), which have premature termination codons as indicated above. In vG6/C-S, the invariant cysteine in the predicted enzymatic active site of G6 was replaced with a serine. Studies with a mutant virus containing a V5-tagged version of G6/C-S indicated that the single amino acid substitution did not affect expression or stability of the protein. The vG6-V5 virus was included in the experiment because epitope tagged G6 was used to determine the localization of G6 in the virus particle. The virulence of the different viruses was assessed by loss of weight and death, which usually peaks between 7 and 10 days after intranasal infection. Mice were weighed every day for 14 days and sacrificed if they lost 30% of their original body weight. According to their virulence, the tested viruses fell into two groups. The group with higher virulence included VACV WR, vG6-rev and vG6-V5, whereas the less virulent group included vG6−1, vG6−2 and vG6/C-S. There was no difference in virulence within each group. At 104 PFU, mice infected with all 3 viruses of the high-virulence group started to lose weight on day 5 and had minimum weight (approximately 70–75% of the original weight) on day 9. At this time ~50% of the mice had died or were sacrificed and the others started to regain weight (Fig. 7A
Discussion Orthologs of VACV G6 protein are encoded in all sequenced poxvirus genomes, which include representatives of 8 genera of chordopoxviruses (and crocodilepox virus that is likely to become the prototype of a new 9th genus) and two distantly related entomopoxviruses. The majority of the genes that are conserved in all poxviruses are essential for virus replication in cell culture, i.e., the corresponding knockout mutants are lethal. Only two exceptions are presently known, namely, the H6R gene encoding a topoisomerase (Da Fonseca and Moss, 2003) and the D10R gene encoding a decapping enzyme (Parrish and Moss, 2006). However, growth of both of those knockout viruses was severely impaired in all cells tested. Thus, the G6R gene appears to be exceptional for a conserved gene in that deletion had little or no consequence for replication in cell culture. Nevertheless, deletion of G6R or mutation of the predicted active site impaired virulence after intranasal infection of mice. The present results appear to place G6R into the category of poxvirus genes that are involved in virus-host interactions, rather than replication per se. This finding is unexpected because G6R is conserved in both chordopoxviruses and entomopoxviruses. Accordingly, the G6 protein might affect a specific defense mechanism or other host function that is shared by insects and vertebrates. Elucidation of the function of G6 in infected animals has the potential to uncover unknown, evolutionarily conserved mechanisms of virus-host interaction. In this regard, it seems intriguing that G6 shows a phylogenetic affinity with bacterial (as opposed to eukaryotic) NLPC/P60 proteins; thus, a gene coding for a protein involved in virus-host interaction might have been acquired horizontally from a bacterium (perhaps, a symbiont of the host) at the onset of poxvirus evolution. Previously, a similar origin has been inferred for the A22R gene, which encodes the Holiday junction resolvase, a key enzyme of poxvirus DNA replication (Garcia et al., 2000). G6 was localized by immunoelectron microscopy within the interior of immature virus particles and mostly between the central core and membrane of mature virions. The so-called lateral bodies occupy this space, though neither their function nor their compositions have been determined. The viability of G6R deletion mutants suggested that the packaging of the protein in virus particles does not serve an important function in assembly or virus infectivity. Packaging, however, could provide a means of introducing G6 into cells prior to viral gene expression, as occurs with the herpesvirus tegument proteins, which are located between the membrane and capsids and are mostly involved in host-cell interactions (Roizman et al., 2007). Interestingly, a conserved herpesvirus tegument protein with a cysteine protease domain has been shown to have deubiquitinating activity (Kattenhorn et al., 2005; Schlieker et al., 2005). Given the papain fold, evidence for a putative catalytic cysteine in G6 required for full virulence, and the activities of certain other members of the NlpC/P60 superfamily, the possibility exists that G6 is an isopeptidase that hydrolyzes a specific viral or cellular substrate that has been modified with ubiquitin, SUMO or another ubiquitin-like moiety. Materials and Methods Cells and viruses Cell lines were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). Primary human foreskin fibroblasts were provided by A. McBride (National Institute of Allergy and Infectous Diseases, Bethesda, MD), primary human neonatal foreskin keratinocytes were obtained from Cascade Biologics, Inc. (Portland, OR). Primary chick embryo fibroblasts were prepared from 10-day-old embryos and used in the first passage. Standard procedures used for the preparation and maintenance of BS-C-1 cells and for the propagation, titration and purification of VACV have been described previously (Earl et al., 1998). All recombinant VACV were derived from the WR strain (ATCC, VR-1354). On monolayers of BS-C-1 cells, VACV produced clear plaques that were visible after staining with crystal violet; on other cell monolayers, where plaques were less visible, infected cell foci were detected by immunostaining with anti-VACV antibody, followed by protein A conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (Carroll and Moss, 1997). Recombinant viruses All recombinant VACV were constructed using a strategy that involved transfection of a DNA segment with the sequence of interest with 500 bp flanks to allow homologous recombination. The respective DNA sequence in each case was assembled using overlapping polymerase chain reaction as described previously (Senkevich et al., 2000). vG6-V5/EGFP contains the G6R gene at its original position with a C-terminal V5 epitope tag sequence replacing the last 11 codons followed by the VACV strong late A3 gene promoter (P11) regulating the EGFP gene. In vΔG6, the G6R gene, except for the last 33 codons, was replaced with the EGFP gene preceded by an early/late synthetic vaccinia promoter. vG6-rev, vG6−1, vG6−2, vG6/C-S and vG6-V5 were made from vΔG6 by replacing the EGFP gene with the respective DNA and screening for non-fluorescent plaques on the background of green, fluorescent plaques of the parental vΔG6. vG6-rev contains unmutated G6; vG6−1 and vG6−2 are two independent isolates containing stop codons (TAA) in place of the 24th and 25th codons of the G6R gene, respectively; vG6/C-S contains the G6R gene with cysteine 109 replaced by serine; vG6-V5 contains a V5 epitope tag replacing the last 11 codons of G6R. The modified DNA segment of each virus was PCR-amplified and sequenced. Transmission electron microscopy BS-C-1 cells were infected with 10 PFU of virus per cell for 1 h at 37°C, unadsorbed virus was removed by washing and the incubation continued for a total of 20 h. Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde/0.05% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer for 1 h at room temperature and incubated in 10% gelatin at 37° C. The cell pellet was collected by centrifugation, solidified on ice, cut at 4°C into small cubes infiltrated with 2.3 M sucrose in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, frozen on pins in liquid nitrogen, cut into 70- nm sections on a Leica Ultracut FCS microtome (Wetzlar, Germany). Cryosections were picked up on grids, thawed, washed free of sucrose, and stained with a mAb to a V5 epitope tag (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) followed by rabbit anti-mouse IgG and protein A conjugated to 10-nm gold spheres (Department of Cell Biology, Utrecht University School of Medicine, Utrecht, The Netherlands). Sections were analyzed on a transmission electron microscope (model Philips CM100; FEI Co., Hillsboro, OR). Antibodies Anti-V5 Mab (Invitrogen) was used for electron microscopy and anti-V5 horseradish peroxidase-conjugated Mab (Invitrogen) for western blot analysis. The following rabbit polyclonal antibodies against VACV proteins were used for western blot analysis: anti-L1 (R180), provided by G. Cohen and R. Eisenberg (University of Pennsylvania), which was raised against secreted baculovirus-expressed L1 protein (Aldaz-Carroll et al., 2005), and anti-p4b/4b (R. Doms and B. Moss, unpublished). Determination of virus virulence in mice Groups of 7-week-old female BALB/c mice (5 per group) were anesthetized and inoculated intranasally with 104, 105 or 106 PFU of purified wild type or recombinant VACV in 20 µl of phosphate buffered saline-0.05% bovine serum albumin. Virus titers were determined on the day of challenge to confirm the virus dose. Mice were weighed daily for 14 days and sacrificed if they lost 30% of their original body weight according to institutional guidelines. The virulence of the different viruses was assessed by loss of weight and death, which occurred between 7 and 10 days after infection. Protein sequence analysis The non-redundant protein sequence database (NCBI, NIH, Bethesda, MD) was searched using the BLASTP program, and iterative searches were performed using the PSI-BLAST program (Altschul et al. 1997). Multiple sequence alignments were constructed using the CLUSTAL-X program (Thompson et al., 1997). Acknowledgments We thank Norman Cooper for maintaining and providing cells. The research was supported by the NIAD, NIH intramural program. Footnotes Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Virus Res. 2006 Apr; 117(1):156-84.
[Virus Res. 2006]J Virol. 2003 Jul; 77(13):7590-600.
[J Virol. 2003]Virology. 1990 Nov; 179(1):247-66, 517-63.
[Virology. 1990]Genome Biol. 2003; 4(2):R11.
[Genome Biol. 2003]Genome Biol. 2003; 4(2):R11.
[Genome Biol. 2003]Genome Biol. 2003; 4(2):R11.
[Genome Biol. 2003]Biochemistry. 2000 May 2; 39(17):5215-20.
[Biochemistry. 2000]Virology. 2000 Dec 5; 278(1):244-52.
[Virology. 2000]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Feb 15; 88(4):1511-5.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Sep 30; 100(20):11291-6.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003]J Virol. 2003 Mar; 77(6):3418-29.
[J Virol. 2003]J Gen Virol. 2005 Apr; 86(Pt 4):991-1000.
[J Gen Virol. 2005]J Gen Virol. 1990 Nov; 71 ( Pt 11)():2761-7.
[J Gen Virol. 1990]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Sep 30; 100(20):11291-6.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003]J Virol. 2006 Jan; 80(2):553-61.
[J Virol. 2006]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Aug 1; 97(16):8926-31.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000]Mol Cell. 2005 Aug 19; 19(4):547-57.
[Mol Cell. 2005]J Virol. 2005 Dec; 79(24):15582-5.
[J Virol. 2005]Virology. 1997 Nov 24; 238(2):198-211.
[Virology. 1997]Virology. 2000 Dec 5; 278(1):244-52.
[Virology. 2000]Virology. 2005 Oct 10; 341(1):59-71.
[Virology. 2005]Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 Dec 15; 25(24):4876-82.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 1997]