![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||
Inhibitory Neurotransmission, Plasticity and Aging in the Mammalian Central Auditory System 1 Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, Illinois, USA 2 Illinois College, Jacksonville, Illinois, USA The publisher's final edited version of this article is available free at J Exp Biol. See other articles in PMC that cite the published article.Summary Aging and acoustic trauma may result in partial peripheral deafferentation in the central auditory pathway of the mammalian brain. In accord with homeostatic plasticity, loss of sensory input results in a change in pre- and postsynaptic GABAergic and glycinergic inhibitory neurotransmission. As seen in development, age-related changes may be activity dependent. Age-related presynaptic changes in the cochlear nucleus include reduced glycine levels, while in the auditory midbrain and cortex, GABA synthesis and release are altered. Presumably, in response to age-related decreases in presynaptic release of inhibitory neurotransmitters, there are age-related postsynaptic subunit changes in the composition of the glycine (GlyR) and GABAA receptors (GABAAR). Age-related changes in the subunit makeup of inhibitory pentameric receptor constructs result in altered pharmacological and physiological responses consistent with a net down-regulation of functional inhibition. Age-related functional changes associated with glycine neurotransmission in dorsal cochlear nucleus (DCN) include altered intensity and temporal coding by DCN projection neurons. Loss of synaptic inhibition in the superior olivary complex (SOC) and the inferior colliculus (IC) likely affect the ability of aged animals to localize sounds in their natural environment. Age-related postsynaptic GABAAR changes in IC and primary auditory cortex (A1) involve changes in the subunit makeup of GABAARs. In turn, these changes cause age-related changes in the pharmacology and response properties of neurons in IC and A1 circuits which collectively may affect temporal processing and response reliability. Findings of age-related inhibitory changes within mammalian auditory circuits are similar to age and deafferentation plasticity changes observed in other sensory systems. Although few studies have examined sensory aging in the wild, these age-related changes would likely compromise an animal’s ability to avoid predation or to be a successful predator in their natural environment. Introduction Aging and partial damage to the peripheral sensory systems of mammals appear to result in plastic pre- and postsynaptic changes in the inhibitory neurotransmitter systems of the primary sensory pathways. The exact nature of these changes is dependent upon the anatomic location and function of the inhibitory circuits within the particular primary/lemniscal sensory system. Figure 1
The complex processing which occurs at the level of the MGB and the A1 is beyond the scope of the present review. Coding in the auditory cortex has been recently reviewed by Wang (2007) and also by Rauschecker (2005). As seen in the visual cortex, in the auditory cortex, acoustically complex hierarchical analysis has been described for awake behaving primates (Rauschecker, 2005; Steinschneider et al., 2007). A1 has been shown to undergo age-related plastic changes, including down-regulation of inhibitory coding, similar to that observed at lower levels of the auditory pathway and in visual cortex. Similar to age-related changes, activity dependant changes have been shown to occur in all the primary sensory systems upon selective partial deafferentation (see below). Deafferentation Plasticity Aging can be thought of, in part, as a slow peripheral deafferentation, which in turn can result in compensatory changes throughout the specific sensory CNS. Recent aging studies of primate and feline visual cortex show an age-related loss of orientation and directional selectivity in the responses of visual cortical neurons, including changes consistent with a selective down-regulation of GABA inhibition (Schmolesky et al., 2000; Leventhal et al., 2003; Hua et al., 2006). Similar changes have been observed in humans (Betts et al., 2007). Age-related changes of inhibitory neurotransmission occurring in ascending circuits of the mammalian central auditory system are reviewed below. Where relevant, the effects of adult peripheral deafferentation in the same circuits are described. Homeostatic plasticity describes how, in response to activity dependent input changes in development and deafferentation, neural systems undergo pre- and postsynaptic compensatory changes to stay within a relatively narrow operating range of excitation and inhibition (Turrigiano, 2007; Rich and Wenner, 2007). Rich and Wenner (2007) describe how changes in chronic neuronal activity (over a period of days) trigger compensatory changes in synaptic activity, which in turn, contribute to a return toward original levels of neuronal activity. In this light, the sensory literature suggests that partial peripheral deafferentation of somatosensory, visual or auditory central pathways leads to a selective down-regulation of inhibition, perhaps in an effort to restore the system toward original levels of activity (D. M. Caspary, unpublished). A few selected examples illustrate how damage to, or a blockade of, peripheral/central sensory projections results in a selective down-regulation of normal adult GABAergic function in the central target structures. Retinal lesions lead to a reduction of GABA levels in visual cortical regions receiving projections from the damaged area (Rosier et al., 1995). Blockade of peripheral visual input reversibly reduces the number of immunolabeled glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) (the synthetic enzyme for GABA) neurons by 50% in primary visual cortex (Hendry and Jones, 1986; Hendry and Jones, 1988; Jones, 1990). Whisker trimming in adult rats results in reversible reductions of GAD immunostaining and muscimol binding in somatosensory cortex (Akhtar and Land, 1991; Fuchs and Salazar, 1998). While in spinal cord, partial peripheral nerve injury promotes a selective functional loss of GABAergic inhibition in the superficial dorsal horn of the spinal cord (Moore et al., 2002). Behavioral Evidence of Age-related Auditory Dysfunction In humans, age-related hearing loss is associated with both peripheral and central processing deficits that combine to make it difficult for the elderly to process speech and other acoustic signals in noisy or complex environments (Bergman et al., 1976; Willott, 1991; Divenyi and Haupt 1997a; Divenyi and Haupt, 1997b). A common complaint of older adults is difficulty understanding communication signals and speech, in complex acoustic environments (Gordon-Salant and Fitzgibbons, 1993; Dubno et al., 1997; Snell, 1997; Strouse et al., 1998). A decreased ability to temporally process acoustic signals may underpin difficulties processing environmental sounds (Gordon-Salant and Fitzgibbons, 1993; Strouse et al., 1998). The impact of aging on temporal processing has been behaviorally assessed in humans and in laboratory animals by varying the width of a silent gap embedded in a continuous acoustic background (Schneider et al., 1994; Snell, 1997; Schneider et al., 1998; Schneider et al., 1999; He et al., 1999; Lister et al., 2002; Barsz et al., 2002; Ison and Allen, 2003; Roberts et al., 2004; Turner et al., 2005c). In addition, human studies show age-related decline in the ability to extract visual signals from a cluttered visual background (Cremer and Zeef, 1987). Age-related Changes in Mammalian Central Auditory Pathways Inhibitory circuits throughout the auditory neuraxis are responsible for important survival functions. These include coding the localization of sound in space, as well as extraction and coding of salient communication signals. Processing environmental sounds is necessary for successful predation or avoiding predation. Certain species of Chiropterans (bats) use many of these same circuits for echo location to navigate their environment and locate insects (Pollak et al., 1977; Simmons, 1989; Portfors and Sinex, 2003; Vater et al., 2003; Portfors and Sinex, 2005). For example, behavioral studies in bats, kangaroo rats, insects and fish show the importance of the auditory system for survival in the wild. This, in turn, suggests that an age-related degradation of acoustic signal processing (sensory function) could play as important a role as motor decline in loss of normal adult behavioral success within an animal’s natural habitat (Webster and Webster, 1971; Cumming, 1996; Anderson et al., 1998; Sisneros and Bass, 2005; Hollen and Manser, 2006). Increasingly, recent studies suggest that a selective loss of normal adult inhibitory neurotransmission may subserve this loss of sensory function. This review is focused on aging in inhibitory neurotransmitter systems; however, it is important to understand that age-related changes occur in other neurotransmitter systems including serotonergic (Tadros et al., 2007a), cholinergic (Caspary et al., 1990) and excitant amino acids (Banay-Schwartz et al., 1989a; Banay-Schwartz et al., 1989b; Tadros et al., 2007b). Accurate temporal processing depends on the ability of inhibitory circuits to sharpen responses to rapidly time-varying signals (Walton et al., 1997; Walton et al., 1998; Krishna and Semple, 2000; Frisina, 2001; Caspary et al., 2002; Liang et al., 2002). Rapidly time-varying signals play an important role in communication and socialization among mammals. For either predator or prey, the loss of these abilities would prove detrimental to survival. The present review will focus on age-related changes in inhibitory neurotransmission involved in circuits within the CN, the SOC, the IC and the A1 (Fig. 1
Cochlear Nuclei and Superior Olivary Complex The first central auditory “relay stations” are the DCN and VCN (for review see Young and Oertel, 2004). In young adult animals, the VCN codes both time and intensity features of sound (Rhode and Smith, 1986a) sending projections to the second major group of nuclei on the auditory neuraxis, the SOC (Warr, 1966). As with all lemniscal auditory structures (primary ascending auditory pathway), these structures are tonotopically arranged. Low frequency sounds may be coded by a firing pattern that approximates the frequency of the acoustic signal, phase-locking, while higher frequencies are coded spatially (Sullivan, 1985; Rhode and Smith, 1986a; Pollak et al., 2002). Response properties of many neurons code both the fine structure and the envelope of communication signals and environmental sounds. Accurate temporal representations of environmental sounds are required for accurate localization of both low and high frequency sounds (Joris and Yin, 2007). Localization of sounds in the horizontal plane is necessary to avoid predation or to successfully localize prey. Localization of high frequency sounds is thought to involve left vs. right comparison of interaural intensity differences, which primarily occurs in the LSO (Batra et al., 1997; Tollin and Yin, 2002). Neurons which compare low frequency sounds from both sides of the head are mostly located in the MSO. The relative size and importance of the LSO and MSO cell groups are directly related to the frequency range of particular species and their particular diurnal habitats (Warr, 1982). In order to minimize temporal jitter in the SOC system, projection neurons in VCN receive both intrinsic and extrinsic inputs, primarily from glycinergic neurons, which dampen excitatory responses and allow VCN neurons to accurately follow small latency shifts and code rapidly time-varying signals over a wide range of signal intensities (Frisina et al., 1990a). Age–related Changes in Cochlear Nuclei Age-related changes in the cochlear nuclei are suggestive of a compensatory down-regulation of inhibition following an age-related loss of peripheral input (Turner and Caspary, 2005) and have been recently reviewed by Frisina and Walton (2001). These age-related changes include reduction of glycine levels in both DCN and VCN (Banay-Schwartz et al., 1989b) along with changes in the subunit make-up of the pentameric, heteromeric glycine receptor (GlyR) (Krenning et al., 1998; Caspary et al., 2002). Age-related GlyR subunit changes in VCN are suggestive of an age-related return to a more developmental form of the GlyRs with a down-regulation of the α1 and up-regulation of the l aα2 subunit (Krenning et al., 1998). Age-related subunit mRNA changes are found throughout the cochlear nuclei, resulting in the loss of strychnine binding observed in the DCN of both aged rats and mice (Milbrandt and Caspary, 1995; Willott et al., 1997). Functionally, the DCN appears to have a role in the extraction of signals in noise (Gibson et al., 1985), while also coding spectral notches to locate sounds in the vertical plane (Nelken and Young, 1996). Similar to communication sounds, the envelope of amplitude and frequency modulated signals are coded by DCN projection neurons (Frisina et al., 1994; Nelken and Young, 1996; Imig et al., 2000). Many of the major response types within the cochlear nuclei receive intrinsic glycinergic endings from vertical and cartwheel cells in the DCN and D-stellate cells in the VCN (see Oertel and Young, 2004 for review). Strychnine blockade of GlyRs within DCN and VCN increases discharge rate, primarily, within the excitatory response area and reduces synchrony of temporal coded events (Wickesberg and Oertel, 1990; Caspary et al., 1994; Backoff et al., 1999). Response properties recorded from aged DCN projection neurons resemble responses observed in young adult animals from the same DCN neurons with their GlyRs blocked. Fusiform cells display age-related increases in maximum discharge rate and changes in temporal responses, consistent with a loss of glycinergic inhibition (Caspary et al., 2005). The reduced damping seen in the response properties of aged DCN fusiform cells would likely affect the ability to extract salient signals from a cluttered acoustic environment and degrade envelope coding of communication signals. Since DCN output neurons project to the contralateral IC, age-related changes would be reflected in the responses of the fusiform cell projection targets in the IC (Ramachandran et al., 1999; Frisina and Walton, 2001). Age-related Changes in the Superior Olivary Complex As noted above, the subnuclei of the superior olivary complex are highly specialized for the localization of sound in space. For the most part, environmental high-frequency sounds are coded by interaural intensity differences. Circuits leading from the VCN on one side enter the LSO directly, while inputs from the contralateral side, synapse first in the medial nucleus of the trapezoid body, which converts the excitatory glutamatergic message into an inhibitory glycinergic message at a short latency, high fidelity synapse known as the endbulb of Held (Moore and Caspary, 1983). Glycinergic inputs impinge on LSO neurons completing a circuit that is exquisitely suited for spatial localization using interaural intensity (Finalayson and Caspary, 1991). Relatively few aging studies have been carried out in the SOC. A selective loss of inhibitory input from the MNTB to the LSO would hamper localization in the ipsilateral hemifield. Casey and Feldman (1982; 1988) found that MNTB neurons were selectively lost in two strains of aged rat. However, functional studies found only small changes in the slope of interaural intensity difference functions in the F344 rat (Finlayson and Caspary, 1993). Two additional aging studies in mouse and gerbil also found relatively small age-related changes in the SOC (O’Neill et al., 1997; Frisina, 2001; Gleich et al., 2004). SOC studies do show age-related changes in potassium channels and calcium binding proteins in cells of origin of a descending pathway from the SOC to the cochlea (Zettle et al., 2007). Inferior Colliculus The IC is a mandatory relay-station on the ascending auditory pathway (Oliver and Heurta 1992; Pollak et al., 2002; Malmierca, 2003; Morest and Oliver, 1984). Age-related changes of inhibition within the IC would likely impair the ability of the animal to further refine the localization of an environmental sound source from information received from the SOC, nuclei of the lateral lemnisci, and DCN (Litovsky and Delgutte, 2002; Escabi et al., 2003; Pecka et al., 2007; Palmer et al., 2007). In addition, inhibition plays a role in processing acoustic delay information as well as strict temporal processing (Pollak et al., 2002). Delay coding is critical for echo location in bats and may play a role in processing periodic vs. aperiodic segments in communication signals. IC circuits utilizing both GABAergic and glycinergic inhibition have been shown to be important in coding selective communication calls in animals and are critically involved in delay circuits in bats (Yan and Suga, 1996; Portfors and Wenstrup, 2001; Klug et al., 2002). The IC receives excitatory glutamatergic inputs directly from the DCN as well as a major ascending projection from the SOC (see Kelly and Caspary, 2005 for review). Extrinsic GABAergic projections to the IC arise bilaterally from the dorsal nuclei of the lateral lemniscus, while glycinergic inputs originate from the ventral nucleus of the lateral lemniscus and the LSO. In addition, intrinsic GABAergic neurons are located throughout both the central nucleus and the shell nuclei of the IC. IC neurons also receive a major excitatory descending projection from the auditory cortex (Winer et al., 1998; Winer et al., 2002; Winer, 2006). As is the case for age-related changes described below, it is not known whether age-related inhibitory changes in IC are the result of de novo aging changes within the central nervous system or are the direct result of a gradual loss of peripheral input or both. In response to superthreshold acoustic stimulation, noise-exposed animals (modest damage to the auditory periphery) show altered evoked responses in the IC and auditory cortex, providing a functional picture suggestive of hyperexcitability (Willott and Lu, 1982; Popelar et al., 1987; Salvi et al., 1990; Gerken et al., 1991; Syka et al., 1994; Szczepaniak and Møller, 1995; Wang et al., 1996; Syka and Rybalko, 2000; Aizawa and Eggermont, 2007). Neurochemical findings in support of these functional changes reveal that damage to the auditory periphery results in a selective down-regulation of normal adult inhibitory GABAergic function in the IC. Surface-recorded evoked potentials from the IC of noise-exposed rats show reduced sensitivity to bicuculline blockade (Szczepaniak and Møller, 1995). Bledsoe et al. (1995) found that deafness resulted in decreased GABA release in vivo and decreased numbers of IC neurons showing electrically evoked suppression of unit activity. IC GAD levels were reduced 2–30 days following noise exposure (Abbott et al., 1999; Milbrandt et al., 2000). GABA uptake and release following ossicle removal or cochlear ablation resulted in complex long-term changes in GABA and glycine neurochemistry (Suneja et al., 1998). Collectively, these studies suggest that decreased acoustic input at the auditory periphery results in significant changes in GABA neurotransmission in normal adult IC. Age–related Changes in Inferior Colliculus Single unit recordings from the IC of aged rats show a significant decrease in the level of inhibition within the excitatory response area, an increase in the breadth of the excitatory response area at 30 dB above threshold, and less precise temporal processing of modulated sounds (Palombi and Caspary, 1996a; Palombi and Caspary, 1996b; Palombi and Caspary, 1996c; Shaddock-Palombi et al., 2001). Similar physiological changes occur in C57 and CBA mice (Willott, 1986; Willott et al., 1988; Willott et al., 1991; McFadden and Willott, 1994; Walton et al., 1998; Walton et al., 2002; Simon et al., 2004). A number of measures of presynaptic GABA neurotransmission show age-related changes in the mammalian IC. GABA levels, GABA immunostaining, GAD activity and GABAA and GABAB receptor binding all decrease in the aged rodent IC (Banay-Schwartz et al., 1989a; Banay-Schwartz et al., 1989b; Caspary et al., 1990; Gutiérrez et al., 1994; Raza et al., 1994; Milbrandt et al., 1994; Milbrandt et al., 1996;). The IC neuropil shows an age-related rearrangement of synaptic endings onto soma and proximal dendrites (Helfert et al., 1999). Possibly in response to age-related presynaptic changes, age-related postsynaptic changes occur in the mammalian IC GABAA receptor. The GABAA receptor is a heterogeneous family of ligand-gated Cl− ion channel receptors, which receive input from GABA-releasing inhibitory circuits. GABAA receptors exist as pentameric subunit complexes made up of combinations of 19 possible GABAA receptor subunits, which can be activated/allosterically modulated by numerous pharmacological agents (Sieghart, 1992a; Sieghart, 1992b; Wafford et al., 1993; Sieghart, 1995; Rabow et al. 1995; Mohler et al., 2002). Thus, changes in the make-up of the GABAA receptor would alter the function of sensory coding in the aged IC. In the IC, both GABAA receptor subunit message and protein levels show age-related changes with a significant down-regulation of the adult α1 subunit in favor of an up-regulation of the α 3 GABAA receptor subunit (Gutierrez et al., 1994; Milbrandt et al., 1997; Caspary et al., 1999). In situ hybridization and western blot studies show significant age-related up-regulation of the γ1 subunit (Fig. 3
In addition, a direct measure of age-related subunit efficacy was obtained by examining the ability of GABA to flux Cl − ions into microsac/synaptosome preparations from rat IC. GABA influx was significantly increased in samples from aged rat IC, confirming oocyte expression studies noted above (Caspary et al., 1999). These findings differ with previous whole brain synaptosome chloride uptake studies, which found reduced Cl− uptake with aging (Concas et al., 1988). Age-related GABAA receptor changes may reflect a partial postsynaptic compensation for the significant age-related loss in presynaptic GABA release. Taken together, these changes suggest a net down-regulation from normal levels of adult inhibitory function in the aged animals leading to a degradation of temporal and binaural coding in the aged IC. Primary Auditory Cortex Primary auditory cortex (A1) is generally considered necessary for perception and interpretation of the stimulus. Acoustic information reaching A1 has been extensively processed/coded at lower levels of the auditory neuraxis and generally no longer directly resembles the acoustic stimulus in time, intensity, or spatial relationship when observed in the discharge properties of A1 neurons (Schreiner et al., 2000; Nelken, 2004). A1 receives its major ascending projection from the medial geniculate body (MGB) projecting to A1 layer IV (Brodal, 1981; Winer and Lee, 2007). Inputs from the contralateral auditory cortex and nonauditory inputs impinge on layers II and VI with descending and intracortical outputs from layer V (Winer et al., 1998; Winer, 2006). Functionally, A1 has a tonotopic map of the cochlea and a map of binaural properties with excitation and inhibition from the different hemifields represented on orthogonal stripes (Purves et al., 2007). Different regions of primary auditory cortex may be specialized for processing frequency combinations or may selectively code frequency or amplitude modulations (Schreiner et al., 2000). Acoustic processing in non-primary auditory cortex is not well understood, but is likely involved in higher-order processing of scenes and communication signals (Esser et al., 1997; Nelkin, 2004). Specifically, the ability to process temporal sequences of sound, similar to those found in communication signals, is lost following ablation of auditory cortex in cats and primates (Neff, 1977; Hupfer et al., 1977). Thus, without the auditory cortex, primates cannot discriminate conspecific communication sounds from each other (Hupfer et al., 1977). Increased neural noise in the aged cortex due to loss of GABAergic inhibition would likely impair normal adult coding functions. Age-related Changes in Primary Auditory Cortex Aging in mice with high frequency hearing loss showed tonotopic reorganization of A1 similar to that observed with small lesions of the cochlea in adult animals (Willott et al., 1993; Irvine et al., 2000). In rats, aging was associated with deterioration of temporal processing speed in A1 neurons, which was not present in lower structures such as the inferior colliculus and auditory thalamus (Mendelson and Ricketts, 2001; Lee et al., 2002; Mendelson and Lui, 2004). These electrophysiological studies suggest that aging is associated with degraded spectral and temporal properties of the auditory cortex, which might play a role in accurate processing of communication signals. In a recent aging study in rat A1, Turner et al. (2005a) found that aging was associated with a number of changes in response properties. First, the distribution of receptive field shapes was altered in aging. A percentage of classic V/U-shaped, receptive fields (Fig. 5A
The two major divergent receptive field shapes clearly code sounds differently and are thought to convey different stimulus information (Turner et al., 2005a; Turner et al., 2005b), and are likely to have distinctly different projection patterns (Hefti and Smith, 2000; Hefti and Smith, 2003). V/U-shaped receptive field neurons are more closely associated with larger pyramidal cells that form the descending projections to the brainstem (Games and Winer, 1988; Winer et al., 1998; Winer and Prieto, 2001; Turner et al., 2005a). In contrast, neurons with the Complex maps are associated with smaller layer V pyramidal neurons thought to exhibit an intracortical projection pattern and are more likely to receive direct inhibitory inputs (Hefti and Smith, 2000; Hefti and Smith, 2003; Turner et al., 2005a; Turner et al., 2005b). The relative reduction of V/U-shaped maps and increase in Complex maps could have significant implications for auditory processing in aged animals. The loss of the tips of the tuning curves with aging and hearing loss, in combination with a reduction in the more finely-tuned V/U-shaped receptive fields, would impact descending pathways. Similarly, the relative increase in the poorly tuned Complex receptive fields, as well as their reduced inhibitory response to sound, might serve to introduce more noise into A1 and cortical coding of sound in general. Together, receptive field changes observed in the two major types of aged auditory cortex neurons could translate into degraded coding of acoustic signals, especially in complex acoustic environments. The degree to which these electrophysiological changes seen in aging are associated with specific neurochemical changes related to GABA neurotransmission has been addressed in a series of studies. As noted above, age-related changes within the auditory brainstem included pre- and postsynaptic changes in the neurochemistry of the inhibitory neurotransmitters, GABA and glycine. As was the case for the inferior colliculus, there were significant age-related reductions in the level of both the message and protein for GAD in the rat A1 (Ling et al., 2005). The largest age-related changes in GAD message were found in A1 layer II (GAD67: -40%, Ling et al., 2005). Although GAD message changes related to aging have been observed in other cortical regions, including hippocampus, protein changes in parietal cortex were small when compared to GAD protein changes in A1 (Fig. 6
Overview and Future Research A search of the background literature for this review quickly revealed that little systematic neuroethological research has examined age-related hearing loss and its impact on survival in the wild. While the importance of auditory and visual acuity has been shown to have great survival value for a number of different species (Webster and Webster, 1971; Cumming, 1996; Anderson et al., 1998; Sisneros and Bass, 2005; Hollen and Manser, 2006), the impact of sensory aging on predator/prey relationships in a natural habitat has not been well studied. Many years ago, Webster and Webster (1971) demonstrated that altering the nature of the middle ear of the kangaroo rat changed hearing sensitivity in such a way that the adult kangaroo rats were more susceptible to predation by snakes in a restricted natural habitat. Similar studies designed to examine the impact of aging in the wild have not been carried out. Studies designed to examine the impact of aging, in species which survive into old age in the wild, are sorely needed. Additional sensory studies might investigate how compensatory plastic changes at one brain nucleus within a circuit would impact on other nuclei, and how homeostatic plasticity of aging might differentially affect changes in temporal reliability relative to changes in the place code. Future studies will need to model the impact of age-related changes across the entire ascending and descending auditory pathways mapping the plastic adjustments with both positive and negative consequences throughout the system. It is generally assumed that many mammalian species don’t survive into old age in the wild. However, few systematic aging studies have been done for most species in the wild. The present studies suggest that it is important to consider the impact of age-related sensory dysfunction on survival, rather than simply focus on the impact of aging on normal adult motor function. Conclusions Studies reviewed above suggest there is an age-related net down-regulation of glycinergic and GABAergic inhibition throughout the auditory central nervous system. Behavioral studies in humans and animals suggest 1) an age-related loss of GAP detection, a measure of temporal processing (Barsz et al., 2002); 2) an age-related loss of localization of sound in space (Warren et al., 1978; Brown, 1984) and 3) an age-related loss in the ability to discriminate complex communication signals (Gordon-Salant and Fitzgibbons, 1993; Frisina and Frisina, 1997; Gordon-Salant and Fitzgibbons, 2001; Hamann et al., 2004; He et al., 2007). Diminished dampening due to a decrease of tonic inhibition, reduced accuracy of binaural cues due to a loss of time-locked inhibition, and an increase in neural noise due to a loss of tonic inhibition, all observed in aged populations at different levels of the central auditory process, or help explain the significant auditory deficits observed in aged animals. Acknowledgments We would like to thank Judy Bryan, Jennifer Parrish, Patricia Jett, and Hongning Wang for their time and efforts toward the editing of this review. This review and studies were supported by the National Institutes of Health, Institute on Deafness and other Communicative Disorders DC 000151-27 to DMC. List of Abbreviations References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1965 Jun; 74():463-85.
[Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1965]Exp Brain Res. 1973 Jun 29; 17(4):428-42.
[Exp Brain Res. 1973]J Neurophysiol. 1985 Jan; 53(1):89-109.
[J Neurophysiol. 1985]Hear Res. 1990 Mar; 44(2-3):99-122.
[Hear Res. 1990]J Neurophysiol. 2001 Dec; 86(6):2647-66.
[J Neurophysiol. 2001]Hear Res. 2007 Jul; 229(1-2):81-93.
[Hear Res. 2007]Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2005 Dec; 1060():125-35.
[Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2005]Nat Neurosci. 2000 Apr; 3(4):384-90.
[Nat Neurosci. 2000]Neurobiol Aging. 2006 Jan; 27(1):155-62.
[Neurobiol Aging. 2006]Vision Res. 2007 Jun; 47(13):1769-80.
[Vision Res. 2007]Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2007 Jun; 17(3):318-24.
[Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2007]Trends Neurosci. 2007 Mar; 30(3):119-25.
[Trends Neurosci. 2007]J Comp Neurol. 1995 Aug 28; 359(3):476-89.
[J Comp Neurol. 1995]Nature. 1986 Apr 24-30; 320(6064):750-3.
[Nature. 1986]Neuron. 1988 Oct; 1(8):701-12.
[Neuron. 1988]J Gerontol. 1976 Sep; 31(5):533-8.
[J Gerontol. 1976]Ear Hear. 1997 Apr; 18(2):100-13.
[Ear Hear. 1997]Ear Hear. 1997 Jun; 18(3):189-201.
[Ear Hear. 1997]J Acoust Soc Am. 1997 Apr; 101(4):2214-20.
[J Acoust Soc Am. 1997]J Acoust Soc Am. 1998 Oct; 104(4):2385-99.
[J Acoust Soc Am. 1998]Science. 1977 May 6; 196(4290):675-8.
[Science. 1977]Cognition. 1989 Nov; 33(1-2):155-99.
[Cognition. 1989]J Neurophysiol. 2003 Oct; 90(4):2274-90.
[J Neurophysiol. 2003]J Exp Biol. 2005 Aug; 208(Pt 16):3121-31.
[J Exp Biol. 2005]Neurobiol Aging. 2007 Jul; 28(7):1112-23.
[Neurobiol Aging. 2007]J Comp Physiol A. 1997 Aug; 181(2):161-76.
[J Comp Physiol A. 1997]J Neurosci. 1998 Apr 1; 18(7):2764-76.
[J Neurosci. 1998]J Neurophysiol. 2000 Jul; 84(1):255-73.
[J Neurophysiol. 2000]Hear Res. 2002 Jun; 168(1-2):163-73.
[Hear Res. 2002]J Neurophysiol. 2002 May; 87(5):2237-61.
[J Neurophysiol. 2002]J Neurophysiol. 1986 Aug; 56(2):287-307.
[J Neurophysiol. 1986]Exp Neurol. 1966 Apr; 14(4):453-74.
[Exp Neurol. 1966]J Neurophysiol. 1985 Jan; 53(1):201-16.
[J Neurophysiol. 1985]Hear Res. 2002 Jun; 168(1-2):60-78.
[Hear Res. 2002]Trends Neurosci. 2007 Feb; 30(2):70-8.
[Trends Neurosci. 2007]Neurochem Res. 1989 Jun; 14(6):563-70.
[Neurochem Res. 1989]Laryngoscope. 1998 Jan; 108(1 Pt 1):26-31.
[Laryngoscope. 1998]Hear Res. 2002 Jun; 168(1-2):163-73.
[Hear Res. 2002]J Comp Neurol. 1997 Sep 1; 385(3):405-14.
[J Comp Neurol. 1997]J Neurophysiol. 1985 Apr; 53(4):940-58.
[J Neurophysiol. 1985]J Neurosci. 1983 Jan; 3(1):237-42.
[J Neurosci. 1983]Neurobiol Aging. 1982 Fall; 3(3):187-95.
[Neurobiol Aging. 1982]Neurobiol Aging. 1993 Mar-Apr; 14(2):127-39.
[Neurobiol Aging. 1993]Hear Res. 1997 Oct; 112(1-2):158-66.
[Hear Res. 1997]Hear Res. 2004 Aug; 194(1-2):47-59.
[Hear Res. 2004]Hear Res. 2002 Jun; 168(1-2):60-78.
[Hear Res. 2002]Int Rev Neurobiol. 2003; 56():147-211.
[Int Rev Neurobiol. 2003]J Comp Neurol. 1984 Jan 10; 222(2):209-36.
[J Comp Neurol. 1984]J Neurophysiol. 2002 Feb; 87(2):976-94.
[J Neurophysiol. 2002]J Neurosci. 2003 Dec 17; 23(37):11489-504.
[J Neurosci. 2003]Science. 1982 Jun 18; 216(4552):1331-4.
[Science. 1982]Hear Res. 1987; 26(3):239-47.
[Hear Res. 1987]Hear Res. 1990 Dec; 50(1-2):245-57.
[Hear Res. 1990]Hear Res. 1991 May; 53(1):101-12.
[Hear Res. 1991]Hear Res. 1994 Aug; 78(2):158-68.
[Hear Res. 1994]J Neurophysiol. 1996 Nov; 76(5):3114-25.
[J Neurophysiol. 1996]Hear Res. 1996 Oct; 100(1-2):59-67.
[Hear Res. 1996]Hear Res. 1996 Oct; 100(1-2):41-58.
[Hear Res. 1996]Hear Res. 2001 Mar; 153(1-2):174-80.
[Hear Res. 2001]J Neurophysiol. 1986 Aug; 56(2):391-408.
[J Neurophysiol. 1986]Neurochem Res. 1989 Jun; 14(6):555-62.
[Neurochem Res. 1989]Neurochem Res. 1989 Jun; 14(6):563-70.
[Neurochem Res. 1989]J Neurosci. 1990 Jul; 10(7):2363-72.
[J Neurosci. 1990]J Neurosci. 1994 Nov; 14(11 Pt 2):7168-79.
[J Neurosci. 1994]Hear Res. 1994 Jun 15; 77(1-2):221-30.
[Hear Res. 1994]Cell Signal. 1992 May; 4(3):231-7.
[Cell Signal. 1992]Mol Pharmacol. 1993 Feb; 43(2):240-4.
[Mol Pharmacol. 1993]Pharmacol Rev. 1995 Jun; 47(2):181-234.
[Pharmacol Rev. 1995]Synapse. 1995 Nov; 21(3):189-274.
[Synapse. 1995]J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2002 Jan; 300(1):2-8.
[J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2002]Life Sci. 1988; 43(22):1761-71.
[Life Sci. 1988]Annu Rev Neurosci. 2000; 23():501-29.
[Annu Rev Neurosci. 2000]Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2004 Aug; 14(4):474-80.
[Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2004]Hear Res. 2007 Jul; 229(1-2):3-13.
[Hear Res. 2007]J Comp Neurol. 1998 Oct 19; 400(2):147-74.
[J Comp Neurol. 1998]Hear Res. 2006 Feb; 212(1-2):1-8.
[Hear Res. 2006]Annu Rev Neurosci. 2000; 23():501-29.
[Annu Rev Neurosci. 2000]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Dec 9; 94(25):14019-24.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997]Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1977 Jul-Aug; 86(4 Pt 1):500-6.
[Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1977]Exp Brain Res. 1977 Oct 24; 30(1):75-87.
[Exp Brain Res. 1977]J Comp Neurol. 1993 Mar 15; 329(3):402-11.
[J Comp Neurol. 1993]Hear Res. 2000 Sep; 147(1-2):188-99.
[Hear Res. 2000]Hear Res. 2001 Aug; 158(1-2):84-94.
[Hear Res. 2001]Hear Res. 2002 Dec; 174(1-2):64-74.
[Hear Res. 2002]Hear Res. 2004 May; 191(1-2):21-33.
[Hear Res. 2004]J Neurophysiol. 2005 Oct; 94(4):2738-47.
[J Neurophysiol. 2005]J Neurophysiol. 2005 Oct; 94(4):2738-47.
[J Neurophysiol. 2005]Hear Res. 2005 Apr; 202(1-2):129-40.
[Hear Res. 2005]J Neurophysiol. 2000 May; 83(5):2626-38.
[J Neurophysiol. 2000]J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2003 Mar; 4(1):106-21.
[J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2003]Hear Res. 1988 Jul 1; 34(1):1-25.
[Hear Res. 1988]J Neurochem. 2004 Apr; 89(1):204-16.
[J Neurochem. 2004]J Exp Biol. 2005 Aug; 208(Pt 16):3121-31.
[J Exp Biol. 2005]Neurobiol Aging. 2002 Jul-Aug; 23(4):565-78.
[Neurobiol Aging. 2002]J Gerontol. 1978 Sep; 33(5):731-6.
[J Gerontol. 1978]J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2001 Aug; 44(4):709-19.
[J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2001]J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2004 Mar; 5(1):49-57.
[J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2004]J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Jul; 122(1):467-77.
[J Acoust Soc Am. 2007]Hear Res. 1992 May; 59(2):171-8.
[Hear Res. 1992]