![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||
Copyright © American Society for Investigative Pathology Stat3 Promotes Metastatic Progression of Prostate Cancer From the Department of Cancer Biology,* Kimmel Cancer Center, and the Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics,† Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; the Department of Urology,‡ St. Clara Hospital, Basel, Switzerland; the Institute for Pathology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland; the Department of Pathology,§ Institute of Biomedicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland; and the Institute of Medical Technology,¶ University of Tampere and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, FinlandAccepted February 14, 2008. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract There are currently no effective therapies for metastatic prostate cancer because the molecular mechanisms that underlie the metastatic spread of primary prostate cancer are unclear. Transcription factor Stat3 is constitutively active in malignant prostate epithelium, and its activation is associated with high histological grade and advanced cancer stage. In this work, we hypothesized that Stat3 stimulates metastatic progression of prostate cancer. We show that Stat3 is active in 77% of lymph node and 67% of bone metastases of clinical human prostate cancers. Importantly, adenoviral gene delivery of wild-type Stat3 (AdWTStat3) to DU145 human prostate cancer cells increased the number of lung metastases by 33-fold in an experimental metastasis assay compared with controls. Using various methods to inhibit Stat3, we demonstrated that Stat3 promotes human prostate cancer cell migration. Stat3 induced the formation of lamellipodia in both DU145 and PC-3 cells, further supporting the concept that Stat3 promotes a migratory phenotype of human prostate cancer cells. Moreover, Stat3 caused the rearrangement of cytoplasmic actin stress fibers and microtubules in both DU145 and PC-3 cells. Finally, inhibition of the Jak2 tyrosine kinase decreased both activation of Stat3 and prostate cancer cell motility. Collectively, these data indicate that transcription factor Stat3 is involved in metastatic behavior of human prostate cancer cells and may provide a therapeutic target to prevent metastatic spread of primary prostate cancer. Progression of prostate cancer to metastatic disease is one of the key problems in the clinical management of prostate cancer.1 This is because there are currently no effective therapies for metastatic prostate cancer, and metastatic prostate cancer is the lethal form of the disease. Identification of the molecular changes that lead to formation of distant metastasis is critical for improvement of therapeutic interventions for metastatic prostate cancer and for development of strategies to prevent primary prostate cancer from metastasizing. Transcription factor Stat3 has been implicated in the promotion of growth and progression of prostate cancer. Stat3, which is both a cytoplasmic signaling molecule and a nuclear transcription factor, belongs to the seven-member Stat gene family of transcription factors.2 Stat3 becomes active by phosphorylation of a specific tyrosine residue in the carboxy-terminal domain by a tyrosine kinase (pY705).3 Activation of Stat3 is supplemented by phosphorylation of a specific serine residue (S727).4 After phosphorylation, Stat3 homodimerizes and translocates to the nucleus where it binds to specific Stat3 response elements of target gene promoters to regulate transcription.3 Transcription factor Stat3 is constitutively active in clinical human prostate cancer,5,6,7,8,9 and activation of Stat3 has been associated with advanced stage of prostate cancer.5,9 Moreover, several reports implicate Stat3 in promotion of prostate cancer cell proliferation and inhibition of apoptosis.5,10,11 Recent studies have linked Stat3 to metastatic progression of several different cancer types. These include lung, skin, liver, ovarian, kidney, and colon cancer.12,13,14,15,16,17 Contribution of Stat3 to metastatic progression of these cancers occurs through a variety of molecular mechanisms. Stat3 was associated with a migratory phenotype of lung cancer cells12 while promoting angiogenesis of melanoma and hepatocellular cancer in animal tumor models.13,14 In ovarian cancer, Stat3 was suggested to increase cell motility and invasion through effects on cell adhesion and cytoskeleton.15 Moreover, a number of studies using mouse embryo fibroblasts as the model system established Stat3 as a component of RhoGTPase-signaling cascade and an effector of cell migration via regulation of actin cytoskeleton.18,19,20,21,22 In addition, Stat3 was linked to cell migration via regulation of microtubules by interaction with stathmin protein.23 In colon and renal cancer, active Stat3 expression was associated with tumor invasion and poor clinical outcome in patients.16,17 Based on these findings, we formed the hypothesis that Stat3 contributes to the progression of prostate cancer to advanced disease by promoting metastatic spread of human prostate cancer cells. Here, we show that Stat3 induces metastatic behavior of human prostate cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. First, using activation-specific Stat3 antibody we show that phosphorylated Stat3 localized in the nucleus and is activated in 77% of lymph node and 67% of bone metastases of clinical human prostate cancer. Gene delivery of wild-type Stat3 by adenovirus (AdWTStat3) to DU145 and PC-3 cells promoted migration of the cells as shown by wound filling and Boyden chamber assays. Moreover, Stat3 promoted formation of lamellipodia in both DU145 and PC-3 cells, which was accompanied by a phenotypic change in the cytoplasmic arrangement of actin stress fibers and microtubules. Importantly, Stat3 induced a 33-fold increase in colonization of DU145 cells to the lungs of nude athymic mice. Stat3 activation in human prostate cancer cells did not involve RhoGTPases but was rather mediated by Jak2 tyrosine kinase. In summary, Stat3 promotes metastatic behavior of human prostate cancer cells and may provide a therapeutic target protein to prevent metastatic progression of primary human prostate cancer. Materials and Methods Clinical Human Prostate Cancer Specimens and Prostate Cancer Metastases The recurrent human prostate cancer specimens (n = 188) were obtained from the Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland (n = 76)24 and from the Institute for Pathology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland (n = 112).25 All samples were transurethral resections from local recurrences. Of the 188 patients, 121 had received androgen ablation therapy (orchiectomy, n = 76; luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone, n = 19; estrogen, n = 1; anti-androgen, n = 2; orchiectomy + estrogen, n = 2; maximal androgen blockade, n = 21), whereas the rest (n = 67) had received no hormonal treatment. Paraffin-embedded prostate cancer metastases were obtained from the Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland (n = 95) (lymph node, n = 44; to bone, n = 1; to other organs, n = 50) and from Georgetown University, Washington, DC (lymph node, n = 22; to bone, n = 14) (approved by the Thomas Jefferson University Institutional Review Board). Adenoviral Gene Delivery Adenoviruses carrying human wild-type Stat3 (AdWTStat3), transcriptionally inactive Stat3 (AdDNStat3) (C-terminally truncated at amino acid 715), wild-type Jak2 (AdWtJak2), and a kinase-domain deleted dominant-negative Jak2 (AdDNJak2) were a gift from Dr. Hallgeir Rui at Thomas Jefferson University.26 Viral stocks were expanded in large-scale cultures, purified by double cesium chloride gradient centrifugation, and titered side-by-side by a standard plaque assay method in QBI-HEK-293A cells (Qbiogene, Carlsbad, CA) per the manufacturer’s instructions. For adenoviral gene delivery, DU145 and PC-3 cells were infected with AdDNStat3, AdWTStat3, AdWTJak2, or AdDNJak2 at multiplicity of infection (m.o.i.) of 10 for 90 minutes, after which RPMI 1640 containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) was added. Immunostaining of Paraffin-Embedded Tissue Sections Slides containing deparaffinized formalin-fixed prostate cancer sections were microwaved in a pressure-cooker with antigen retrieval solution AR-10 (BioGenex Laboratories, San Ramon, CA). Endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked by 0.3% hydrogen peroxide, and nonspecific binding of immunoglobulin was minimized by preincubation in 10% normal goat serum for 2 hours at room temperature. Anti-phosphotyrosine-Stat3 (Y705) polyclonal antibody (pAb) (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA) was used at a concentration of 1:100. Antigen-antibody complexes were detected using a biotinylated goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody (BioGenex Laboratories) followed by streptavidin-horseradish-peroxidase complex using 3,3(prime)-diaminobenzidine as chromogen and Mayer hematoxylin as counterstain. Scoring of Levels of Active Stat3 in Metastatic and Recurrent Clinical Human Prostate Cancers Individual prostate tumor samples were scored (M.T.N. and J.A.) for active nuclear Stat3 levels on a scale from 0 to 3, where 0 is undetectable and 1 represented positive immunostaining. Solubilization of Proteins, Immunoprecipitation, and Immunoblotting For immunoprecipitation, DU145, LNCaP, PC-3, and CWR22Rv1 prostate cancer cells were lysed in lysis buffer [10 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 7.6), 5 mmol/L ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, 50 mmol/L NaCl, 30 mmol/L sodium pyrophosphate, 50 mmol/L sodium fluoride, 1 mmol/L sodium orthovanadate, 1% Triton X-100, 1 mmol/L phenylmethyl sulfonyl fluoride, 5 μg/ml aprotinin, 1 μg/ml pepstatin A, and 2 μg/ml leupeptin]. The cell lysates were immunoprecipitated for 2 hours with anti-Stat3 pAb (a gift from Dr. Robert Kirken, University of Texas, El Paso). Antibodies were captured by incubation for 2 hours with protein A-Sepharose beads (Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ). The primary antibodies were used at the following concentrations: anti-phosphotyrosine Stat3 pAb (Y705, 1:1000; Cell Signaling), anti-phosphoserine Stat3 pAb (1:1000, Cell Signaling), anti-Stat3 mAb (1:1000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), anti-Jak2 pAb (1:1000; Upstate Biotechnology, Lake Placid, NY), anti-actin pAb (1:3000; Sigma, St. Louis, MO) and detected by horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies in conjunction with enhanced chemiluminescence substrate mixture (Amersham, Piscataway, NJ) and exposed to film. RhoA inhibitors (555550 and Y27632) and a Rac1 inhibitor (553502) were purchased from Calbiochem (San Diego, CA). Wound Filling Assay DU145 (1.5 × 106 cells/well) or PC-3 (1.25 × 106 cells/well) cells were mock-infected or infected with AdWTStat3, AdDNStat3, AdWTJak2, or AdDNJak2 at a m.o.i. of 10. Identical scratches were made in parallel wells 24 hours after infection using a 1000-μl plastic pipette tip. The cells were fixed by 0.5% crystal violet solution (Sigma) at 0, 24, 48, and 72 hours. The size of wound was measured and the percentage of the cells that had migrated was calculated. Cell Motility Assay DU145 and PC-3 cells were mock-infected or infected with AdLacZ, AdWTStat3, AdDNStat3, AdWTJak2, or AdDNJak2 at a m.o.i. of 10. Cells were harvested 24 hours after infection and single-cell suspension of 2.5 × 104 cells was added to the upper chamber of a motility chamber system (8.0 μm pore size; BD BioSciences, San Jose, CA) (modified Boyden chamber assay). FBS (5%) in RPMI media was used as chemoattractant in the lower chamber. The cells were incubated for 24 hours, and the cells that traversed the membrane pores to the lower membrane were fixed, stained with the Diff Quik staining kit (Dade Behring Inc., Newark, DE) and counted in four different quadrants. Each experiment was done in triplicate and error bars represent the mean ± SE. siRNA Transfections Human Stat3 and control siRNA were from Dharmacon (Lafayette, CO). DU145 cells at 40 to 50% confluence were transfected with Stat3 or scrambled control siRNA (100 pmol/well of a 3-cm well) using Lipofectamine2000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After 24, 48, or 72 hours, the cells were harvested for Western blotting, cell viability assays, or microtubule immunocytochemistry. Clustering Assay DU145 and PC-3 cells were infected with AdWTStat3 or AdDNStat3 at a m.o.i. of 10. Twenty-four hours after adenoviral infection, the cells were seeded on Matrigel (total protein, 8.5 mg/ml; endotoxin, 1.0 U/ml) (BD Biosciences) that was spread on glass coverslips. After incubation for 96 hours, the cells were observed for morphological alterations and photographed (Nikon Stereoscope, Chuoku, Japan). Quantification of the Volume of Lamellipodia Photographs of wound margins from wound filling assay of DU145 cells were analyzed for lamellipodia. The areas of lamellipodia along the wound margins were measured using the Metamorph program (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA). The surface areas of lamellipodia were calculated per cell and plotted on a graph. Immunofluorescence Cytochemistry of Actin and Tubulin DU145 (3 × 104 cells) and PC-3 (1.5 × 104) cells grown on cover glasses were mock-infected or infected with AdWTStat3, AdDNStat3, AdWTJak2, or AdDNJak2 at a m.o.i. of 10. Forty-eight hours after adenoviral expression of Stat3 and Jak2 proteins, the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline for 15 minutes followed by permeabilization with 0.1% Triton X-100 in 4% paraformaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline for 15 minutes. The cells were incubated with rhodamine-conjugated phalloidin (Invitrogen, Eugene, OR) for 1 hour. For immunofluorescence cytochemistry of tubulin, 4% paraformaldehyde and 0.1% Triton X-100 were made in PHEM buffer (60 mM PIPES, 27.5 mM HEPES, 10 mM EGTA, 8 mM MgSO4, pH 7), and the cells were stained with an antibody against tubulin (clone TU-01; Invitrogen) diluted (1:100) in blocking buffer, which was detected with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated secondary antibody (Invitrogen). The nuclei were stained with mounting media containing 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) and examined under a LSM510 META confocal laser scanning microscope with an ×63 objective (Zeiss, Thornwood, NY). Tail-Vein Injections of Human Prostate Cancer Cells Castrated male athymic mice were purchased from Taconic (Germantown, NY) and cared for according to the institutional guidelines. DU145 cells were infected with a m.o.i. of 10 of AdLacZ, AdWTStat3, and AdDNStat3. After 24 hours, 1 × 106 cells were suspended in 0.2 ml of phosphate-buffered saline and injected into the lateral tail vein using a 27-gauge needle. The mice were sacrificed 8 weeks after inoculation, and the lungs were perfused with 1.5 ml of 15% India ink dye in 3.7% formalin. Lungs were then removed, rinsed in water for 15 seconds, and bleached in Fekete’s solution (70% ethanol, 3.7% formaldehyde, 0.75 mol/L glacial acetic acid). Lung surfaces were photographed and scored. Statistical Analysis Differences in groups with respect to number of migrated cells and wound size were assessed using two-sample t-tests or analysis of variance as appropriate. Pair-wise comparisons were performed if the overall analysis of variance test for differences in means was significant. P values for these comparisons were adjusted using Tukey’s procedure. Results Stat3 Is Activated in Clinical Prostate Cancer Metastasis and in Recurrent Prostate Cancer As the first step to test the hypothesis that Stat3 promotes metastatic behavior of human prostate cancer cells, we determined how frequently Stat3 is activated in clinical prostate cancer metastases (n = 131) and recurrent human prostate cancers (n = 181). Stat3 activation was analyzed by immunohistochemical detection of paraffin-embedded tissue sections. In addition to active Stat3 immunostaining, prostate cancer metastases sections were immunostained for PSA to verify the location of prostate cancer cells within the metastases-containing tissues. Parallel sections were stained with normal rabbit serum as a negative control (data not shown). Representative prostate cancer metastases to bone and lymph nodes with positive immunoreaction for active Stat3 and PSA are presented in Figure 1, A and B
A positive immunoreaction for active Stat3 was detected in 64% (84 of 131) of prostate cancer metastases (Table 1). In prostate cancer metastases to regional lymph nodes, an intense immunoreaction for active Stat3 was detected in 77% (51 of 66) of the specimens, whereas Stat3 was activated in 67% (10 of 15) of the bone metastases. Moreover, Stat3 was active in 56% (28 of 50) of prostate cancer metastases to distant organs other than bone. To further investigate Stat3 activation in advanced prostate cancer, we assessed Stat3 activation in recurrent human prostate tumors. Significant activation of Stat3 was detected in 86% (162 of 188) of recurrent human prostate cancer specimens (Table 1). Of these 188 patients, 121 had been treated with androgen deprivation before the recurrence occurred (see Materials and Methods section). Stat3 was constitutively active in 96 of the 121 recurrent prostate cancers (79%) treated with hormone therapy (Table 1). In summary, our results indicate that Stat3 is constitutively active in the majority of distant prostate cancer metastases and in recurrent hormone-refractory prostate cancer.
Stat3 Promotes Motility of Human Prostate Cancer Cells Given that Stat3 is constitutively active in the majority of clinical human prostate cancer metastases (Table 1), we aimed to determine whether Stat3 is involved in the regulation of metastatic behavior of prostate cancer cells in vitro. The metastatic process is a sequential cascade of multiple cellular events involving invasion of the cells into extracellular matrix, migration of the cells, changes in homo- and heterotypic adhesion, as well as changes in angiogenesis. We chose first to focus on establishing the effects of Stat3 on prostate cancer cell migration because previous studies have suggested that Stat3 proteins may affect cell motility in other cancer types.12,15,19,23 DU145 and PC-3 cells were selected as the experimental models because both cell lines are androgen-independent with high metastatic potential in in vivo studies.27,28,29,30,31 Moreover, DU145 cells express high levels of active Stat3, whereas PC-3 cells do not endogenously express Stat3 (Figure 1C) The migration of DU145 cells was increased by 2.8-fold in cells infected with AdWTStat3 (m.o.i. = 10), compared to cells infected with transcriptionally inactive Stat3 (AdDNStat3) (m.o.i. = 10) (P < 0.0001) as determined by wound filling assay 48 hours after adenoviral exposure (Figure 2A, a and b)
Stat3 Decreases Homotypic Cell Clustering and Induces Lamellipodia Formation To investigate the role of Stat3 in the invasive capacity of human prostate cancer cells in vitro, we examined the effects of Stat3 on homotypic cluster formation of DU145 cells cultured on Matrigel, a collagen-rich extracellular matrix that provides a more physiological growth environment than plastic. DU145 cells (Figure 3A)
Because overexpression of Stat3 in DU145 and PC-3 cells was associated with increased migration of the cells, we investigated whether Stat3 expression was associated with morphological changes characteristic to motile cells (Figure 3B) Stat3 Induces Experimental Metastases of DU145 Cells Because Stat3 induced migration of both DU145 and PC-3 cells in vitro, and because Stat3 is constitutively active in the majority of clinical human prostate cancer metastases, we next tested whether Stat3 will affect the in vivo metastasis process of human prostate cancer cells. We performed experimental metastases assay by infecting DU145 cells with adenovirus expressing WTStat3, DNStat3, or LacZ at a m.o.i. of 10. Twenty-four hours after the adenoviral gene delivery, we injected DU145 cells in athymic nude mice through the tail veins (1 × 106 cells per mouse). The lungs were harvested after 8 weeks and stained with India ink, bleached with Fekete’s solution, and scored for surface lung metastases. As demonstrated in Figure 3C Stat3 Induces Polarization of Actin Cytoskeleton and the Microtubule Network of Prostate Cancer Cells Because Stat3 promoted experimental metastases of human prostate cancer cells in vivo, we next focused our study on the molecular changes underlying Stat3-induced cell migration. Reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton and the microtubule network are the primary mechanisms of cell motility and essential for cell migration. Specifically, actin is organized in parallel bundles forming filopodia or a dense meshwork that forms ruffling lamellipodia. This reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton promotes protrusion of the leading edge of the cell.33,34 In addition, filamentous actin forms contractile stress fibers in migrating cells and is responsible for the contraction of the cell body and retraction of the trailing edge. Because Stat3 induced lamellipodia formation in both DU145 and PC-3 cells, we examined whether Stat3 affects polymerization and organization of the actin cytoskeleton in prostate cancer cells. WTStat3 or DNStat3 were delivered to DU145 cells and PC-3 cells using adenovirus at a m.o.i. of 10 and mock-infected cells served as an additional control. Forty-eight hours after adenoviral expression of Stat3 proteins, the cells were fixed and immunostained for actin using FITC-conjugated secondary antibodies. In both DU145 and PC-3 cells, adenoviral expression of WTStat3 induced extensive polarization of the actin cytoskeleton (Figure 4A)
Although the actin cytoskeleton provides protrusive and contractile forces, microtubules are important for the intrinsic cell polarization and directional cell migration. Specifically, microtubules are thought to provide a network that allows organelle and protein movement throughout the cell and are linked to actin polymers directly or through intermediate proteins or signaling molecules.23,33,34 Our finding that Stat3 regulates the actin cytoskeleton organization led us to ask whether microtubule polarization is also affected by Stat3 in prostate cancer cells. Parallel wells of DU145 and PC-3 cells, immunostained for actin, were stained for the presence of α-tubulin using FITC-conjugated secondary antibodies (Figure 4B) Jak2, but Not RhoGTPases, Contributes to the Stat3-Induced Migration of Prostate Cancer Cells As a next step, we aimed to identify the kinases involved in the activation of Stat3 and induction of prostate cancer cell migration. The major tyrosine kinases that are known to phosphorylate Stat3 are Jak1 and Jak2,3 which leads to dimerization of Stat3 and translocation of the Stat3 dimer to the nucleus. However, in several different cell types, RhoGTPases are also known to mediate Ser-727 and Tyr-705 phosphorylation and nuclear translocation of Stat3.18,19,35 Importantly, Rho family GTPases regulate the dynamics and organization of microtubules and the assembly of contractile actin in migratory cells.33,36 To test whether RhoGTPases activate Stat3 in human prostate cancer cells, DU145 cells expressing constitutively active Stat3 were treated with increasing concentrations of pharmacological RhoA inhibitors (555550 and Y27632) and a Rac1 inhibitor (553502) for 24, 48, and 72 hours (Figure 5A)
In the next set of experiments, we tested whether Jak2 regulates Stat3 activation in human prostate cancer cells. DU145 cells were infected with adenovirus expressing DNJak2 with WTJak2 or mock-infected cells as the controls, and whole cell lysates were analyzed for Stat3 tyrosine phosphorylation by Western blotting at 24 and 48 hours after the adenoviral exposure at a m.o.i. of 10 (Figure 5C) Discussion Disseminated prostate cancer is a significant challenge for clinical management of prostate cancer. The molecular mechanisms underlying metastatic spread of primary prostate cancer are unclear, therefore limiting the development of effective pharmacological therapies for advanced prostate cancer. In this work, we showed that transcription factor Stat3 induced a 33-fold increase in the number of lung metastases in an in vivo experimental prostate cancer metastases model. We further showed that Stat3 is constitutively active in 77% of lymph node and 67% of bone metastases of clinical prostate cancers. Stat3 induced motility of human prostate cancer cells in culture, and Jak2-activated Stat3 stimulated extension of cytoplasmic actin stress fibers and microtubules in prostate cancer cells. These molecular changes likely underlie lamellipodia formation and the migratory phenotype of human prostate cancer cells induced by Stat3. The key finding of this work is the robust Stat3 induction of lung metastases in an in vivo prostate cancer metastases model. This result is important because in vitro observations on invasiveness or motility of a cell line in culture do not necessarily translate into cells having the ability to metastasize in vivo. Previous reports have focused primarily on enhancement of prostate cancer cell growth by Stat3, which yielded somewhat conflicting results.5,10,11,37,38,39,40 The work presented here is the first study showing promotion of prostate cancer metastases by Stat3 in vivo. The experimental model in this work was tail-vein injections of nude mice with DU145 prostate cancer cells infected with adenovirus expressing wild-type Stat3 with LacZ or transcriptionally inactive Stat3 as controls. It is known that intravenous inoculation of cancer cells into tail veins of nude mice typically results in the development of metastases in the first capillary bed encountered. In this metastases assay, the first capillary network is in the lungs where the prostate cancer cell metastases developed. Future studies should focus on determining the Stat3-induced colonization patterns of human prostate cancer cells after inoculation of the cancer cells to the left cardiac ventricle. In addition, direct implantation of prostate cancer cells expressing active Stat3 into the long bones should determine whether Stat3 is involved in bone metastases formation of prostate cancer cells. Orthotopic prostate tumor growth studies would be able to address the question of whether Stat3 increases local invasion of prostate cancer cells to the neighboring tissues. Moreover, orthotopic prostate tumor growth studies will be able to establish whether human prostate cancer cells expressing active Stat3 will have increased capability to migrate to capillaries and lymphatic ducts in the primary tumor site. Increased colonization of prostate cancer cells into lungs may reflect an increased ability of prostate cancer cells to survive in the pulmonary tissue environment when the cells overexpress active Stat3. An alternative explanation is that the increase in the number of lung metastases induced by Stat3 is attributable to increased extravasation of prostate cancer cells from the lung capillaries to the lung tissue. Enhanced extravasation of prostate cancer cells because of Stat3-stimulated cell motility is supported by our data obtained in cell culture. Specifically, Stat3 increased migration of human prostate cancer cells in vitro in both wound filling and Boyden chamber assays. We also found that Stat3 induced morphological changes characteristic of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition of carcinoma cells such as lamellipodia formation and decreased cell clustering, which was consistent with the Stat3-induced motility of the cells. Lamellipodia formation of DU145 and PC-3 cells was accompanied by Stat3-induced changes in the actin cytoskeleton and the microtubule network. In the control cells, actin fibers and microtubules were arranged circularly around the nuclei, which is characteristic to nonmigratory cells. In contrast, in cells infected with adenovirus expressing WTStat3, actin fibers and microtubules extended toward the lamellipodia and the leading edge. The molecular mechanisms underlying Stat3-regulation of the microtubule network and rearrangement of actin fibers in human prostate cancer cells remain to be determined. Studies on potential Stat3 regulation of heterotypic adhesion of prostate cancer cells with endothelial cells are currently ongoing. We showed in this work that Stat3 is constitutively active in the majority of prostate cancer metastases to lymph nodes and to bones. The factors and mechanisms contributing to the constitutive activation of Stat3 in human prostate cancer metastases are currently unclear. Such mechanisms may involve an autocrine loop of interleukin-6 in prostate cancer metastases. We show in this work that Jak2 activates Stat3 in prostate cancer cells. In contrast, inhibition of RhoGTPases, known to be involved in cell migration and known to activate Stat3 in several cell types,18,19,35 had no effect on serine or tyrosine phosphorylation of Stat3 in prostate cancer cells. Activating mutations of Jak2 have been recently described in hematopoietic malignancies resulting in constitutive activation of Stat5.41 Such Jak2 mutations may also occur in metastatic prostate cancer and result in constitutive activation of Stat3. A third potential mechanism for constitutive activation of Stat3 in prostate cancer metastases is amplification of the Stat3 gene. This is particularly interesting because the gene encoding Stat3 is located in chromosome 17,32 which is frequently altered in prostate cancer.42 In conclusion, this work provides the first evidence of involvement of transcription factor Stat3 in prostate cancer metastases in vivo. Studies testing newly developed pharmacological inhibitors of Stat343,44,45 in prostate cancer should include testing their efficacy in inhibiting metastatic spread of prostate cancer in experimental metastases models of prostate cancer in vivo. Acknowledgments We thank Drs. Shyh-Han Tan and Zhiyong Liao for providing critical feedback for this manuscript; and Dr. Hallgeir Rui for AdLacZ, AdDNStat3, AdWTStat3, AdWTJak2, and AdDNJak2 constructs. Footnotes Address reprint requests to Marja T. Nevalainen, M.D., Ph.D., Dept. of Cancer Biology, Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, 233 S. 10th St., BLSB 309, Philadelphia, PA 19107. E-mail: marja.nevalainen/at/jefferson.edu or m_nevalainen/at/mail.jci.tju.edu. Supported by the National Institutes of Health (Cancer Center support grant CA56035-08 to the Kimmel Cancer Center) and the Department of Defense Prostate Cancer Research Program (Idea Development grant W81XWH-06-01-0076 to M.T.N.). J.A. and L.G. contributed equally to this study. References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||
Surg Oncol. 2006 Nov; 15(3):117-28.
[Surg Oncol. 2006]Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2001 Apr; 13(2):211-7.
[Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2001]Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2002 Sep; 3(9):651-62.
[Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2002]Cell. 1995 Jul 28; 82(2):241-50.
[Cell. 1995]Cancer Res. 2002 Nov 15; 62(22):6659-66.
[Cancer Res. 2002]Am J Pathol. 2001 Jan; 158(1):25-32.
[Am J Pathol. 2001]Oncogene. 2005 May 12; 24(21):3397-408.
[Oncogene. 2005]Cancer Res. 2006 Mar 15; 66(6):3188-96.
[Cancer Res. 2006]Clin Cancer Res. 2006 Dec 1; 12(23):7140-8.
[Clin Cancer Res. 2006]Cancer Res. 2004 May 15; 64(10):3550-8.
[Cancer Res. 2004]J Urol. 2002 Aug; 168(2):762-5.
[J Urol. 2002]Am J Pathol. 2001 Dec; 159(6):2089-94.
[Am J Pathol. 2001]Int J Cancer. 2005 Feb 10; 113(4):619-28.
[Int J Cancer. 2005]Oncogene. 2005 Jan 27; 24(5):746-60.
[Oncogene. 2005]Oncogene. 2005 May 12; 24(21):3397-408.
[Oncogene. 2005]Cancer Res. 2004 May 15; 64(10):3550-8.
[Cancer Res. 2004]J Biol Chem. 2005 Apr 29; 280(17):17275-85.
[J Biol Chem. 2005]J Cell Biol. 2006 Jan 16; 172(2):245-57.
[J Cell Biol. 2006]Cancer Res. 1999 Apr 15; 59(8):1987-93.
[Cancer Res. 1999]Cancer Sci. 2005 Jul; 96(7):379-86.
[Cancer Sci. 2005]Traffic. 2004 Jul; 5(7):470-7.
[Traffic. 2004]J Cell Biol. 2006 Jan 16; 172(2):245-57.
[J Cell Biol. 2006]Cancer Sci. 2005 Jul; 96(7):379-86.
[Cancer Sci. 2005]Traffic. 2004 Jul; 5(7):470-7.
[Traffic. 2004]Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2002 Sep; 3(9):651-62.
[Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2002]Mol Biol Cell. 2001 Oct; 12(10):3282-94.
[Mol Biol Cell. 2001]J Biol Chem. 2005 Apr 29; 280(17):17275-85.
[J Biol Chem. 2005]Science. 2000 Oct 6; 290(5489):144-7.
[Science. 2000]Cancer Sci. 2005 Jul; 96(7):379-86.
[Cancer Sci. 2005]Cancer Res. 2002 Nov 15; 62(22):6659-66.
[Cancer Res. 2002]Clin Cancer Res. 2003 Jan; 9(1):370-6.
[Clin Cancer Res. 2003]Mol Cancer Ther. 2004 Jan; 3(1):11-20.
[Mol Cancer Ther. 2004]Prostate. 2000 Feb 1; 42(2):88-98.
[Prostate. 2000]Prostate. 2000 Feb 15; 42(3):186-95.
[Prostate. 2000]Mol Biol Cell. 2001 Oct; 12(10):3282-94.
[Mol Biol Cell. 2001]J Biol Chem. 2005 Apr 29; 280(17):17275-85.
[J Biol Chem. 2005]Science. 2000 Oct 6; 290(5489):144-7.
[Science. 2000]Lancet. 2005 Mar 19-25; 365(9464):1054-61.
[Lancet. 2005]Oncogene. 2003 Feb 27; 22(8):1247-52.
[Oncogene. 2003]Curr Pharm Des. 2005; 11(22):2841-54.
[Curr Pharm Des. 2005]Mol Cancer Ther. 2004 Mar; 3(3):261-9.
[Mol Cancer Ther. 2004]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Mar 29; 102(13):4700-5.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005]