![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||
Copyright © 2003, The National Academy of Sciences Biochemistry Crystal structure of the tyrosine kinase domain of the hepatocyte growth factor receptor c-Met and its complex with the microbial alkaloid K-252a Departments of *Chemistry and ¶Biology, Pharmacia S.p.A., Discovery Research, Viale Pasteur 10, 20014 Nerviano (MI), Italy; and §Sugen, Inc., 230 East Grand Avenue, South San Francisco, CA 94080 ‡ To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: nikolaus.schiering/at/pharma.novartis.com or maria.flocco/at/pharmacia.com. †Present address: Novartis Pharma AG, WKL-127.P.72, CH-4002, Basel, Switzerland. Communicated by Gregory A. Petsko, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, July 2, 2003 Received February 20, 2003. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract The protooncogene c-met codes for the hepatocyte growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase. Binding of its ligand, hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor, stimulates receptor autophosphorylation, which leads to pleiotropic downstream signaling events in epithelial cells, including cell growth, motility, and invasion. These events are mediated by interaction of cytoplasmic effectors, generally through Src homology 2 (SH2) domains, with two phosphotyrosine-containing sequence motifs in the unique C-terminal tail of c-Met (supersite). There is a strong link between aberrant c-Met activity and oncogenesis, which makes this kinase an important cancer drug target. The furanosylated indolocarbazole K-252a belongs to a family of microbial alkaloids that also includes staurosporine. It was recently shown to be a potent inhibitor of c-Met. Here we report the crystal structures of an unphosphorylated c-Met kinase domain harboring a human cancer mutation and its complex with K-252a at 1.8-Å resolution. The structure follows the well established architecture of protein kinases. It adopts a unique, inhibitory conformation of the activation loop, a catalytically noncompetent orientation of helix αC, and reveals the complete C-terminal docking site. The first SH2-binding motif (1349YVHV) adopts an extended conformation, whereas the second motif (1356YVNV), a binding site for Grb2-SH2, folds as a type II β-turn. The intermediate portion of the supersite (1353NATY) assumes a type I β-turn conformation as in an Shc–phosphotyrosine binding domain peptide complex. K-252a is bound in the adenosine pocket with an analogous binding mode to those observed in previously reported structures of protein kinases in complex with staurosporine. Hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor (HGF/SF)-c-Met signaling is the center of interest for many laboratories due to its importance for both embryonic development, and, when dysregulated, tumorigenesis, particularly in the development of invasive and metastatic phenotypes (1). The original identification of an N-terminal-truncated oncogenic met version on treatment of a human osteosarcoma cell line with the carcinogen N-methyl-N′-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine led Cooper et al. to suggest the abbreviation “met” for this transforming gene (2). c-Met was subsequently shown to be a receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) and the receptor for HGF/SF (3–5). It is the most thoroughly studied member of a small subfamily of RTKs that also includes Ron and Sea. With no orthologs identified in Drosophila melanogaster or Caenorhabditis elegans, c-Met is thought to be unique to vertebrates (6). c-Met is an α–β heterodimer with an extracellular α-chain disulfide linked to the membrane-spanning β-chain (1,390 residues) harboring the intracellular tyrosine kinase domain. Kinase activation is achieved through autophosphorylation of tyrosines 1234 and 1235 in the activation loop (A loop) (7, 8). Perhaps the most striking characteristic of this RTK subfamily is the presence of a conserved tandem-tyrosine containing multifunctional docking site at the C terminus (supersite; in c-Met: 1349YVHVNAT1356YVNV) established to be absolutely required for c-Met signaling both in vitro and in vivo (9, 10). Knock-in mice with phenylalanine substitutions of these tyrosines lead to an embryonically lethal phenotype that resembles that of c-met or HGF knockout animals, presenting placental, liver, muscle, and nerve defects (11). On activation, Tyr-1349 and Tyr-1356 become autophosphorylated and serve as docking sites for a wide spectrum of transducers and adaptors, including PI3K, Src, Grb2, Shc, Gab1, and Stat3 (12). Binding is accomplished in general through interaction with Src homology 2 (SH2) domains, and, in some instances, through Met-binding (Gab1) and phosphotyrosine-binding (PTB) (Shc; ref. 13) domains of the binding partners. The resulting multiprotein signaling complex triggers the intracellular downstream effects, including cell proliferation, scattering, and inhibition of apoptosis. c-Met gene amplification and/or protein overexpression are frequently found in a number of human carcinomas. In addition, germ-line and somatic missense mutations in the c-Met kinase domain have been identified in papillary renal and hepatocellular carcinoma, as well as in lymph node metastases of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSC) (for reviews, see refs. 1, 6, and 14). These mutations, which render the kinase constitutively active, provide compelling evidence for the link between HGF receptor signaling and cancer and make c-Met a bona fide drug target. Staurosporine is a potent, nonselective protein kinase inhibitor, the first of >50 alkaloids with an indolocarbazole subunit isolated to date (15). Structures of staurosporine in complex with the Ser/Thr kinase domains of CDK2 and protein kinase A (PKA), as well as the tyrosine kinase domains of CSK and Lck, have been reported (16–19). They revealed a common binding mode in the adenosine cleft, induced conformational changes of the enzyme to accommodate the large compound through a complementary apolar interaction surface, and specific hydrogen-bonding interactions (for recent reviews on kinase structure and inhibition, see refs. 20 and 21). The staurosporine analog K-252a is a potent inhibitor of a number of Ser/Thr kinases and the Trk-family of RTKs (22, 23). It was recently shown to potently inhibit also c-Met autophosphorylation, HGF-mediated cell scattering, as well as c-Met-driven proliferation in gastric carcinoma cells, and reported to cause reversion of tumorigenicity in fibroblasts transformed with an oncogenic form of c-Met (24). Here we report the crystal structures of a kinase domain of apo-Met and its complex with K-252a at 1.8-Å resolution. Methods Expression, Purification, and Characterization. c-Met residues 1049–1360 were cloned into the vector PVL1393 (Pharmingen), modified by insertion of GST, a PreScission cleavage site and a Kozak sequence. Of the three major phosphorylation sites, Tyr-1194 and Tyr-1234 were mutated into phenylalanine, and Tyr-1235 was mutated to aspartate to obtain an active form of the kinase (25) by using the QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene). An additional conservative mutation (V1272L) was present in the cDNA template used. Recombinant c-Met was expressed by using High-five insect cells (Invitrogen) and purified by GSH affinity chromatography in 50 mM Tris, pH 7.4/50 mM NaCl/10% glycerol/20 mM DTT. The GST tag was removed by using PreScission protease (Amersham Biosciences) and the recombinant protein was passed over a Resource Q column equilibrated in 50 mM Tris, pH 8.5/50 mM NaCl/3 mM DTT. The flow-through contained the purified protein, which was >95% pure as judged by SDS/PAGE and was found homogeneous and unphosphorylated by mass spectrometry. The specific activity of the mutated protein was comparable with wild-type c-Met by using gastrin as substrate. Details of the construct design and characterization will be published elsewhere. Crystallization. Crystals of apo-Met and the complex with K-252a were obtained by using the hanging drop method and a protein concentration of 10 mg/ml. After optimization, crystals of apo-Met were prepared by mixing 1 μl of the protein in 50 mM Tris, pH 8.5/150 mM NaCl/10% glycerol/3 mM DTT with the same volume of reservoir solution [6–10% polyethylene glycol (PEG) 5000 monomethyl ether/100 mM Hepes, pH 7.1/11% isopropanol]. Employing streak seeding at day 1, crystals grew within a few days to ≈0.2 × 0.06 × 0.02 mm3 at 4°C. K-252a was purchased from Calbiochem. The complex was cocrystallized, adding the DMSO-solubilized compound at a 1.5-fold molar excess. Data Collection and Structure Solution. Diffraction images were collected at the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (Grenoble, France) beamline ID14-2. The crystals were stabilized in mother liquor containing 15% glycerol before freezing in liquid nitrogen. Raw data were reduced with denzo (26) and scaled and merged by using scalepack (ref. 26 and Table 1). The structure of the K-252a complex was solved by molecular replacement by using the program epmr (27) and atomic coordinates of another inhibitor complex of c-Met as a starting model (unpublished data). Interactive model building with the program o (28) was alternated with refinement by using cnx (29) employing simulated annealing, the maximum likelihood target, bulk solvent correction, and restrained B factor refinement. Final rounds of refinement were performed with refmac (30), and water molecules were added by arp (31). Throughout, 5% of the reflections were kept separate for crossvalidation. Refinement of apo-Met was initiated by using as a starting model the refined coordinates of the K-252a complex and was pursued by using an analogous protocol. In apo-Met, 93.5% of the residues are in the most favored region of the Ramachandran plot (K-252a: 92.4%; ref. 32). Statistics for the final models are included in Table 1.
Isothermal Titration Calorimetry (ITC) Affinity Measurements. ITC measurements were carried out as reverse titrations by using a MicroCal VP-ITC calorimeter. A 100-μM solution of c-Met mutant FFD in PBS and 1 mM DTT was titrated into a 10-μM solution of K-252a prepared in the same buffer. Dilution heats were determined by blank titrations and were subtracted from the normalized dilution heat data. Data were fitted to a single-site model by using the origin software package and fitting routines provided with the instrument. Results and Discussion The c-Met kinase domain follows the bilobal protein kinase architecture with an N-terminal, mainly β-sheet-containing domain linked through a hinge segment to the mainly α-helical C lobe (Fig. 1a
The closest structural similarity is with FGFRK (34), where, in addition to almost the entire C lobe, the majority of the N-lobe secondary structure elements also superimpose closely. The largest difference between these structures in the N lobe is found for helix αC (nomenclature according to ref. 37). In c-Met, the N-terminal portion of αC is pushed away from the C lobe with these helices forming an angle of ≈20° in the superimposed structures from the pivot point at the residue pair 1134 (c-Met)-538 (FGFRK). The difference in the orientation of αC is even more pronounced when comparing c-Met with the active conformation of the insulin receptor [triple-phosphorylated IRK (IRK3P)] (36), where an angle of ≈30° from the residue pair 1134 (c-Met)-1054 (IRK3P) toward the N terminus of the helix is observed. αC in the inactive conformation of insulin receptor [nonphosphorylated IRK (IRK0P)] (35), on the other hand, assumes a similar relative orientation with respect to the kinase body as observed in c-Met. The salt bridge between residues Lys-1110 (β3) and Glu-1127 (αC) expected to be present in the active kinase conformation is not observed in the two c-Met structures described here (Fig. 1b At the N terminus of the structure, before the core kinase domain, residues 1060–1069 form a helix (1067–1069: 310 helix) not present in FGFRK or IRK. The C terminus of αA in PKA is close to the C terminus of this helix in c-Met, but these helices extend toward the N terminus in opposite directions. In c-Met, αA packs at a slight angle and with parallel directionality against αC, with residues Leu-1062, Val-1066, and Val-1069 intercalating with Leu-1125 and Ile-1129 from αC (Fig. 1b The c-Met A loop adopts a unique conformation beyond residue Phe-1223 of the DFG motif. Residues 1223–1226 bulge up toward the N lobe, adopting a type II′ β-turn conformation with residues Gly-1224 and Leu-1225 at the center of the turn. At the apex of this bulge toward the N-lobe is Leu-1225, of which the side chain is in van der Waals distance to Gly-1128 approximately at the center of αC (Fig. 1c In the apo-Met structure, A-loop residues 1231–1244 are not defined by electron density, whereas in the K-252a complex, the entire A loop is ordered. In wild-type c-Met, tyrosines 1234 and 1235 become phosphorylated on receptor activation (7). In our crystallographic studies, we used a mutant where these tyrosines were substituted with phenylalanine and aspartate, respectively. Y1235D is a mutation described in metastatic HNSC carcinoma, leading to an increase in c-Met kinase activity and conferring an invasive phenotype to transformed cells (25). The third mutated residue is Tyr-1194, which was exchanged for phenylalanine. Phe-1194 points into a pocket formed by residues Lys-1198 and Leu-1195, both also originating from αE, as well as His-1136 and Phe-1134 at the C terminus of αC (Fig. 1c A-loop residues 1231–1244 in the K-252a complex adopt a conformation different from that of other active or inactive kinases (IRK0P, IRK3P, and FGFRK, and Fig. 1 c and d Binding of K-252a. K-252a differs from staurosporine in the glycosyl portion, having a furanose, rather than a pyranose moiety (Fig. 2a
K-252a binds in the adenosine pocket of c-Met with an analogous binding mode to that reported for staurosporine in several kinase complexes (refs. 16–19 and Fig. 2b A large number of hydrophobic contacts between K-252a and the enzyme are present in the complex, with a high complementarity between the interacting surfaces (Fig. 2c The side chains of Met-1211, together with those of Met-1160 and Met-1229 that flank it in van der Waals distance, build a platform for the bottom of the indolocarbazole plane. Major K-252a-induced conformational differences between the apo and complex structures concern the N-terminal portion of the A loop, residues Asp-1228, Met-1229, and Tyr-1230. The side chain of Met-1229, as oriented in apo-Met, would pass through the hinge-distal six-membered ring of the indolocarbazole moiety. To make room for the alkaloid, the main chain moves by 3.8 and 3.1 Å for the Cα positions of Met-1229 and Tyr-1230, with the side chains moving by 5.5 (SD Met-1229) and 6.8 Å (OH Tyr-1230). Arg-1208, which in apo-Met stacks with the phenolic side chain of Tyr-1230, moves its side chain in the complex by 8 Å (CZ atoms) toward the catalytic base, Asp-1204, to free the space for the side-chain position of Tyr-1230 in the K-252a complex. In its new position, which corresponds to the one observed for this conserved arginine residue in IRK and FGFRK, Arg-1208 stacks with its guanidinium portion against the benzyl ring of Phe-1234 (wild-type Tyr-1234) in the A loop (Fig. 1c C-Terminal Docking Site. In c-Met, the C-terminal tail sequence 1349YVHVNAT1356YVNV contains the two tyrosines, which, after phosphorylation, act as docking sites for a multitude of intracellular signal transducers through interactions with SH2, MBD, and PTB domains. Whereas the majority of the SH2-containing binding partners are reported to bind to both motifs, 1356YVNV is a consensus-binding site for the Grb2 SH2 domain. In general, phosphotyrosine-containing peptides bind to SH2 domains in an extended conformation (38). Grb2 SH2 is the only SH2 domain reported to date that binds the peptides in a type I β-turn conformation with the asparagine residue in the position pY + 2 forming two hydrogen bonds with the SH2 domain (39, 40). The bulky Trp-121 side chain in the EF loop of Grb2-SH2 excludes an extended peptide conformation. In our structures, neither of the tyrosines are phosphorylated. The protein chain is in an extended conformation for residues 1349–1352, followed by two β-turns, 1353–1356 and 1356–1359. The first tyrosine motif assumes an extended geometry as in phosphopeptides bound to canonical SH2 domains. Fig. 3a
The residues 1353NATY fold as a type I β-turn. The sequence of this motif is similar to the consensus sequence for Shc-PTB domain-binding peptides (NPXY). The NMR structure of the PTB domain of a Shc:peptide complex showed the NPXpY motif at the C terminus of a β-strand forming a type I β-turn structure (42). Superposition of this β-turn onto the Cα positions of c-Met 1353–1356 shows a high degree of conformational similarity between both β-turns with a Cα rms deviation of 0.18 Å (Fig. 3a Tyr-1356 and the three residues that follow it form a type II β-turn. Phosphopeptides bind to Grb2 in a type I β-turn conformation, which is related to type II β-turns by a 180° flip of the central peptide unit. Fig. 3b Mutations in Cancer. In several human cancers, point mutations in the c-Met kinase domain have been detected, and have been shown to lead to kinase activation in vitro (see introduction; for a review, see ref. 14). Fig. 1a Val-1092 is a hydrophobic residue in the adenosine-binding cleft, and is also one of the residues that make van der Waals contacts with K-252a (Fig. 2 The structure of c-Met provides additional illustration for the plasticity of protein kinase structures and adds another example of a tyrosine kinase in complex with an indolocarbazole inhibitor. It reveals a conformation of the A loop that contributes with its N-terminal residues to the K-252a-binding site, showing conformational adaptability to indolocarbazole binding. Targeting this subsite might, therefore, aid in the design of specific inhibitors for c-Met. Our study provides structural information for the c-Met kinase domain, including a mutation found in human cancer (Y1235D), and allows mapping of other cancer-related mutations. It elucidates the position and conformation of the C-terminal c-Met supersite in its nonphosphorylated form, allowing to derive a plausible binding orientation for interaction of the Grb2 SH2 domain with the second tyrosine motif. Two additional motifs of the supersite are in a conformation seen in complexes with SH2- and PTB-domain-containing binding partners. A confirmation of the relevance of the conformation of the supersite reported here has to await structure determinations of c-Met complexes with intracellular transducers. Acknowledgments We thank Alexander Cameron and Jay Bertrand for discussion and critical reading of the manuscript; A. Cameron and Elena Casale for help with data collection; and Henryk Kalisz, Albert Stewart, Antonella Isacchi, James Christensen, Mario Varasi, Cristiana Marcozzi, Jan Malyszko, Michael Forstner, and Rosario Baldi for discussions and technical support. Notes Abbreviations: HGF, hepatocyte growth factor; SH2, Src homology 2; PTB, phosphotyrosine binding; PKA, protein kinase A; FGFRK, fibroblast growth factor receptor kinase; A loop, activation loop; IRK, insulin receptor kinase; IRK3P, triple-phosphorylated IRK; ITC, isothermal titration calorimetry; MBD, met-binding domain. Data deposition: The atomic coordinates and structure factors have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank, www.rcsb.org (PDB ID codes 1R0P and 1R1W). References 1. Trusolino, L. & Comoglio, P. M. (2002. ) Nat. Rev. Cancer 2, 289–300. [PubMed] 2. Cooper, C. S., Park, M., Blair, D. G., Tainsky, M. A., Huebner, K., Croce, C. M. & Vande Woude, G. F. (1984. ) Nature 311, 29–33. [PubMed] 3. Dean, M. M., Park, M. M., Le Beau, T. S., Robins, T. S., Diaz, M. O., Rowley, J. D., Blair, D. G. & Vande Woude, G. F. (1985. ) Nature 318, 385–388. [PubMed] 4. Bottaro, D. P., Rubin, J. S., Faletto, D. L., Chan, A. M. L., Kmiecick, T. E., Vande Woude, G. F. & Aaronson, S. A. (1991. ) Science 251, 802–804. [PubMed] 5. Birchmeier, C. & Gherardi, E. (1998. ) Trends Cell Biol. 8, 404–410. [PubMed] 6. Maulik, G., Shrikhande, A., Kijima, T., Ma, P. C., Morrison, P. T. & Salgia, R. (2002. ) Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 13, 41–59. [PubMed] 7. Naldini, L., Vigna, E., Ferracini, R., Longati, P., Gandino, L., Prat, M. & Comoglio, P. M. (1991. ) Mol. Cell. Biol. 11, 1793–1803. [PubMed] 8. Ferracini, R., Longati, P., Naldini, L., Vigna, L. & Comoglio, P. M. (1991. ) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 19558–19564. [PubMed] 9. Ponzetto, C., Bardelli, A., Zhen, Z., Maina, F., Dalla Zonca, P., Giordano, S., Graziani, A., Panayotou, G. & Comoglio, P. M. (1994. ) Cell 77, 261–271. [PubMed] 10. Comoglio, P. M. (2001. ) Nat. Cell Biol. 3, 161–162. 11. Maina, F., Casagranda, F., Audero, E., Simeone, A., Comoglio, P. M., Klein, R. & Ponzetto, C. (1996. ) Cell 87, 531–542. [PubMed] 12. Furge, K. A., Zhang, Y. & Vande Woude, G. F. (2000. ) Oncogene 19, 5582–5589. [PubMed] 13. Saucier, C., Papavasiliou, V., Palazzo, A., Naujokas, M. A., Kremer, R. & Park, M. (2002. ) Oncogene 21, 1800–1811. [PubMed] 14. Danilkovitch-Miagkov, A. & Zbar, B. (2002. ) J. Clin. Invest. 109, 863–867. [PubMed] 15. Wood, J. L., Stoltz, B. M., Dietrich, H.-J., Pflum, D. A. & Petsch, D. T. (1997. ) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119, 9641–9651. 16. Prade, L., Engh, R. A., Girod, A., Kinzel, V., Huber, R. & Bossemeyer, D. (1997. ) Structure (London) 5, 1627–1636. 17. Lawrie, A. M., Noble, M. E. M., Tunnah, P., Brown, N. R., Johnson, L. N. & Endicott, J. A. (1997. ) Nat. Struct. Biol. 4, 796–801. [PubMed] 18. Lamers, M. B. A. C., Antson, A. A., Hubbard, R. E., Scott, R. K. & Williams, D. H. (1999. ) J. Mol. Biol. 285, 713–725. [PubMed] 19. Zhu, X., Kim, J. L., Newcomb, J. R., Rose, P. E., Stover, D. R., Toledo, L. M., Zhao, H. & Morgenstern, K. A. (1999. ) Structure (London) 5, 651–661. 20. Huse, M. & Kuriyan, J. (2002. ) Cell, 109, 275–282. [PubMed] 21. Scarpin, G. (2002. ) Drug Discov. Today, 7, 601–611. [PubMed] 22. Kase, H., Iwahashi, K., Nakanishi, S., Matsuda, Y., Yamada, K., Takahashi, M., Murakata, C., Sato, A. & Kaneko, M. (1987. ) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 142, 436–440. [PubMed] 23. Ruggeri, B. A., Miknyoczki, S. J., Singh, J. & Hudkins, R. L. (1999. ) Curr. Med. Chem. 6, 845–857. [PubMed] 24. Morotti, A., Mila, S., Accornero, P., Tagliabue, E. & Ponzetto, C. (2002. ) Oncogene 21, 4885–4893. [PubMed] 25. Di Renzo, M. F., Olivero, M., Martone, T., Maffe, A., Maggiora, P., De Stefani, A., Valente, G., Giordano, S., Cortesina, G. & Comoglio, P. M. (2000. ) Oncogene 19, 1547–1555. [PubMed] 26. Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997. ) Methods Enzymol. 276, 307–326. 27. Kissinger, C. R., Gehlhaar, D. K. & Fogel, D. B. (1999. ) Acta Crystallogr. D 55, 484–491. [PubMed] 28. Jones, T. A., Zou, J. Y., Cowan, S. W. & Kjeldgaard, M. (1991. ) Acta Crystallogr. A 47, 110–119. [PubMed] 29. Brünger, A. T., Adams, P. D., Clore, G. M., DeLano, W. L., Gros, P., Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W., Jiang, J. S., Kuszewski, J., Nilges, M., Pannu, N. S., et al. (1998. ) Acta Crystallogr. D 54, 905–921. [PubMed] 30. Collaborative Computational Project 4 (1994. ) Acta Crystallogr. D 50, 760–776. [PubMed] 31. Perrakis, A., Morris, R. & Lamzin, V. S. (1999. ) Nat. Struct. Biol 5, 458–463. 32. Laskovsky, R. A., MacArthur, M. W., Moss, D. & Thornton, J. M. (1993. ) J. Appl. Crystallogr. 26, 283–291. 33. Mohammadi, M., McMahon, G., Sun, L., Tang, C., Hirth, P., Yeh, B. K., Hubbard, S. R. & Schlessinger, J. (1997. ) Science 276, 955–960. [PubMed] 34. Mohammadi, M., Schlessinger, J. & Hubbard, S. R. (1996. ) Cell 86, 577–587. [PubMed] 35. Hubbard, S. R., Wei, L., Ellis, L. & Hendrickson, W. A. (1994. ) Nature 372, 746–754. [PubMed] 36. Hubbard, S. R. (1997. ) EMBO J. 16, 5573–5581. 37. Knighton, D. R., Zheng, J., Ten Eyck, L. F., Ashford, V. A., Xuong, N., Taylor, S. S. & Sowadski, J. M. (1991. ) Science 253, 407–414. [PubMed] 38. Kuriyan, J. & Cowburn, D. (1997. ) Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 26, 259–288. [PubMed] 39. Rahuel, J., Gay, B., Erdmann, D., Strauss, A., García-Echevírra, C., Furet, P., Caravatti, G., Fretz, H., Schoepfer, J. & Grütter, M. G. (1996. ) Nat. Struct. Biol. 3, 586–589. [PubMed] 40. Schiering, N., Casale, E., Caccia, P., Giordano, P. & Battistini, C. (2000. ) Biochemistry 39, 13376–13382. [PubMed] 41. Eck, M. J., Shoelson, S. E. & Harrison, S. C. (1993. ) Nature 362, 87–91. [PubMed] 42. Zhou, M. M., Ravichandran, K. S., Olejniczak E. F., Petros, A. M., Meadows, R. P., Harlan, J. E., Sattler, M., Wade, W. S., Burakoff, S. J. & Fesik, S. W. (1995. ) Nature 378, 584–592. [PubMed] 43. Miller, M., Ginalski, K., Lesyng, B., Nakaigawa, N., Schmidt, L. & Zbar B. (2001. ) Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet. 44, 32–43. [PubMed] 44. Abagyan, R. A., Totrov, M. M., Kuznetsov, D. N. (1994. ) J. Comput. Chem. 15, 488–506. 45. Mroczkowski, B., Hickey, M., McTigue, M. A., Murray, B. W., Parge, H., Sarup, J. & Zhu, J. (2002. ) Eur. Patent Appl. EP 1 243 5a6 A2. |
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||
Nat Rev Cancer. 2002 Apr; 2(4):289-300.
[Nat Rev Cancer. 2002]Nature. 1984 Sep 6-11; 311(5981):29-33.
[Nature. 1984]Nature. 1985 Nov 28-Dec 4; 318(6044):385-8.
[Nature. 1985]Trends Cell Biol. 1998 Oct; 8(10):404-10.
[Trends Cell Biol. 1998]Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2002 Feb; 13(1):41-59.
[Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2002]Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Apr; 11(4):1793-803.
[Mol Cell Biol. 1991]J Biol Chem. 1991 Oct 15; 266(29):19558-64.
[J Biol Chem. 1991]Cell. 1994 Apr 22; 77(2):261-71.
[Cell. 1994]Cell. 1996 Nov 1; 87(3):531-42.
[Cell. 1996]Oncogene. 2000 Nov 20; 19(49):5582-9.
[Oncogene. 2000]Cell. 2002 May 3; 109(3):275-82.
[Cell. 2002]Drug Discov Today. 2002 Jun 1; 7(11):601-11.
[Drug Discov Today. 2002]Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1987 Jan 30; 142(2):436-40.
[Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1987]Curr Med Chem. 1999 Sep; 6(9):845-57.
[Curr Med Chem. 1999]Oncogene. 2002 Jul 25; 21(32):4885-93.
[Oncogene. 2002]Oncogene. 2000 Mar 16; 19(12):1547-55.
[Oncogene. 2000]Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 1999 Feb; 55(Pt 2):484-91.
[Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 1999]Acta Crystallogr A. 1991 Mar 1; 47 ( Pt 2)():110-9.
[Acta Crystallogr A. 1991]Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 1998 Sep 1; 54(Pt 5):905-21.
[Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 1998]Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 1994 Sep 1; 50(Pt 5):760-3.
[Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 1994]Science. 1997 May 9; 276(5314):955-60.
[Science. 1997]Cell. 1996 Aug 23; 86(4):577-87.
[Cell. 1996]Nature. 1994 Dec 22-29; 372(6508):746-54.
[Nature. 1994]Cell. 1996 Aug 23; 86(4):577-87.
[Cell. 1996]Science. 1991 Jul 26; 253(5018):407-14.
[Science. 1991]Nature. 1994 Dec 22-29; 372(6508):746-54.
[Nature. 1994]Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Apr; 11(4):1793-803.
[Mol Cell Biol. 1991]Oncogene. 2000 Mar 16; 19(12):1547-55.
[Oncogene. 2000]Nat Struct Biol. 1997 Oct; 4(10):796-801.
[Nat Struct Biol. 1997]Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 1997; 26():259-88.
[Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 1997]Nat Struct Biol. 1996 Jul; 3(7):586-9.
[Nat Struct Biol. 1996]Biochemistry. 2000 Nov 7; 39(44):13376-82.
[Biochemistry. 2000]Nature. 1993 Mar 4; 362(6415):87-91.
[Nature. 1993]Nature. 1995 Dec 7; 378(6557):584-92.
[Nature. 1995]Nat Struct Biol. 1996 Jul; 3(7):586-9.
[Nat Struct Biol. 1996]J Clin Invest. 2002 Apr; 109(7):863-7.
[J Clin Invest. 2002]Science. 1991 Jul 26; 253(5018):407-14.
[Science. 1991]Proteins. 2001 Jul 1; 44(1):32-43.
[Proteins. 2001]Curr Med Chem. 1999 Sep; 6(9):845-57.
[Curr Med Chem. 1999]Proteins. 2001 Jul 1; 44(1):32-43.
[Proteins. 2001]Nature. 1993 Mar 4; 362(6415):87-91.
[Nature. 1993]Nature. 1995 Dec 7; 378(6557):584-92.
[Nature. 1995]Nat Struct Biol. 1996 Jul; 3(7):586-9.
[Nat Struct Biol. 1996]