![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||
Copyright © 2003, The National Academy of Sciences Physics Coloration strategies in peacock feathers Surface Physics Laboratory (National Key Laboratory) and T-Center for Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, People's Republic of China * To whom correspondence may be addressed. E-mail: jzi/at/fudan.edu.cn or liuxh/at/fudan.edu.cn. Edited by Y. Ron Shen, University of California, Berkeley, CA, and approved August 26, 2003 Received May 31, 2003. Abstract We report the mechanism of color production in peacock feathers. We find that the cortex in differently colored barbules, which contains a 2D photonic-crystal structure, is responsible for coloration. Simulations reveal that the photonic-crystal structure possesses a partial photonic bandgap along the direction normal to the cortex surface, for frequencies within which light is strongly reflected. Coloration strategies in peacock feathers are very ingenious and simple: controlling the lattice constant and the number of periods in the photonic-crystal structure. Varying the lattice constant produces diversified colors. The reduction of the number of periods brings additional colors, causing mixed coloration. Color production in nature takes advantage of either structural coloration (1, 2) or pigmentation. Structural colors result from the interaction of light waves with a featured structure having the same order of size as the light wavelength. Structural colors in avian feathers have been usually qualitatively understood by thin-film interference (3–5) or the scattering from a spongy matrix structure incoherently (6, 7) or coherently (8, 9). Although the structural colors of avian feathers have been studied for a long time (10–14), many questions remain to be answered. In particular, the precise physical mechanism that produces the diversified colors in peacock tail feathers has not been established. Materials and Methods The male peacock tail contains spectacular beauty because of the brilliant, iridescent, diversified colors and the intricate, colorful eye patterns. Peacock feathers serve as an excellent canonical example for investigating structural colors in avian feathers. The structures of the blue, green, yellow, and brown barbules in the eye pattern of a male green peacock (Pavo muticus) feather were characterized by using an optical microscope and a scanning electron microscope. The peacock tail feather has a central stem with an array of barbs on each side. On each side of a barb there is an array of flat barbules. Each barbule has round indentations of typically ≈20–30 μm, which disperse the incident light, causing coloration. The round indentation has a smoothly curved crescent-like profile in transverse cross section (14). To understand the detailed mechanisms of color production in peacock feathers, a plane-wave expansion method (15) was used to calculate the photonic band structure of the periodic photonic structures. A transfer matrix method (16) was adopted to compute the reflectance spectra to compare with experimental results. Results and Discussion Fig. 1
Note that one or two layers of melanin rods are buried in the surface keratin layer. The lattice constants for the blue, green, and yellow barbules are ≈140, 150, and 165 nm, respectively. In the brown barbule the lattice structure is less regular, with the lattice constants of ≈150 and 185 nm along the directions parallel and perpendicular to the cortex surface, respectively. The number of periods is ≈9–12 for the blue and green barbules, ≈6 for the yellow barbule, and ≈4 for the brown barbule. In Fig. 2A
To confirm that coloration in peacock feathers is produced structurally, barbules were immersed into glycerin (refractive index, 1.47) to fill the air holes. The infiltration of glycerin reduces the refractive index contrast and increases the average refractive index of the system. All peak positions in the reflectance spectra for the glycerin-infiltrated barbules shift to the longer wavelengths (Fig. 2B For a 2D photonic crystal, reflectance spectra for E and H (with the electric vector perpendicular to the melanin rods) polarizations should be different. The measured reflectance spectra for two polarizations show that there is only a small difference in the peak position (Fig. 2C To explore the origin of coloration in peacock feathers, we calculated the photonic band structure of an infinite 2D photonic crystal by a plane-wave expansion method (15), shown in Fig. 3
Note that the midgap frequency scales inversely with the lattice constant. Thus the color strategy in peacock feathers is very simple: the variation of the lattice constant results in different colors. In fact, using the lattice constants for differently colored barbules, the resultant midgap wavelengths match well with the main peak positions observed in the experiment. To confirm the predictions from the photonic band structure, we calculated the reflectance spectra of generic 2D photonic crystals with a finite number of periods by a transfer matrix method (16), shown in Fig. 4
On both sides of the main peaks, the reflectance spectra show some oscillations, due to the Fabry-Perot interference because there are two interfaces in the finite photonic crystal. It is more distinct on the lower wavelength side than on the higher wavelength side. For a photonic crystal consisting of dielectric rods without touching each other, it is the opposite case. The calculated side peaks at the blue wavelength in the yellow and brown barbules agree well with the experimental observations. It should be mentioned that the side peak intensity is more enhanced with the decreasing number of periods. For photonic crystal with a large number of periods, the effect of the partial photonic bandgap is dominant. However, with the decreasing number of periods side peaks also play a role in coloration, giving rise to an additional color. The glycerin immersion measurements reveal that the peak positions in the reflectance spectra shift to longer wavelengths, as shown in Fig. 2B Conclusion Our experiment and simulations reveal that the coloration in peacock feathers takes advantage of the partial photonic bandgap of the 2D photonic-crystal structure in the cortex. The strategies for color production in peacock feathers are very ingenious and rather simple, i.e., by means of the variation of the lattice constant or the number of periods. Varying the lattice constant shifts the midgap frequency of the partial photonic bandgap. The number of periods controls the production of additional colors, eventually leading to the additive, mixed coloration. Diversified colors can be produced by means of these strategies. The revealed physical mechanisms and coloration strategies in peacock feathers could be of great help in understanding structural colors in avian feathers and color steering in nature. Acknowledgments We thank S. H. Xu and X. Y. Hou for technical support and C. T. Chan for interesting discussions. This work was supported primarily by the Chinese National Key Basic Research Special Fund. Partial support from the National Science Foundation of China and the Shanghai Science and Technology Commission, China is acknowledged. Notes This paper was submitted directly (Track II) to the PNAS office. References 1. Srinivasarao, M. (1999. ) Chem. Rev. 99, 1935–1961. [PubMed] 2. Parker, A. R. (2000. ) J. Opt. A Pure Appl. Opt. 2, R15–R28. 3. Mason, C. W. (1923. ) J. Phys. Chem. 27, 401–447. 4. Durrer, H. (1962. ) Verh. Naturf. Ges. Basel 73, 204–224. 5. Land, M. F. (1972. ) Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 24, 77–106. 6. Fox, D. L. (1976. ) Animal Biochromes and Structural Colors (Univ. of California Press, Berkeley). 7. Dyck, J. (1976. ) Proc. Int. Ornithol. Congr. 16, 426–437. 8. Prum, R. O., Torres, R. H., Williamson, S. & Dyck, J. (1998. ) Nature 396, 28–29. 9. Prum, R. O., Torres, R., Williamson, S. & Dyck, J. (1999. ) Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 266, 13–22. 10. Fox, H. M. & Vevers, G. (1960. ) The Nature of Animal Colours (Sidewick & Jackson, London). 11. Dyck, J. (1971. ) Biol. Skrifter. 18, 1–67. 12. Vevers, G. (1982. ) The Colours of Animals, Studies in Biology Series no. 146 (Edward Arnold, London). 13. Prum, R. O. (1999. ) in Proceedings of the 22nd International Ornithological Congress, eds. Adams, N. J. & Slotow, R. H. (BirdLife South Africa, Johannesburg), pp. 1633–1653. 14. Yoshioka, S. & Kinoshita, S. (2002. ) Forma 17, 169–181. 15. Plihal, M. & Maradudin, A. A. (1991. ) Phys. Rev. B 44, 8565–8571. 16. Pendry, J. B. & MacKinnon, A. (1992. ) Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2772–2775. [PubMed] 17. Yablonovitch, E. (1987. ) Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 2059–2062. [PubMed] 18. John, S. (1987. ) Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 2486–2489. [PubMed] 19. Joannoupoulos, J. D., Meade, R. D. & Winn, J. N. (1995. ) Photonic Crystals (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton). 20. Dyck, J. (1971. ) Z. Zellforsch. 115, 17–29. [PubMed] |
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||
Chem Rev. 1999 Jul 14; 99(7):1935-1962.
[Chem Rev. 1999]Phys Rev Lett. 1992 Nov 9; 69(19):2772-2775.
[Phys Rev Lett. 1992]Phys Rev Lett. 1987 May 18; 58(20):2059-2062.
[Phys Rev Lett. 1987]Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat. 1971; 115(1):17-29.
[Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat. 1971]Phys Rev Lett. 1992 Nov 9; 69(19):2772-2775.
[Phys Rev Lett. 1992]