• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of plosgenPLoS GeneticsSubmit to PLoSGet E-mail AlertsContact UsPublic Library of Science (PLoS)View this Article
PLoS Genet. Jun 2008; 4(6): e1000094.
Published online Jun 13, 2008. doi:  10.1371/journal.pgen.1000094
PMCID: PMC2396522

Overlapping Protein-Encoding Genes in Pseudomonas fluorescens Pf0-1

Susan M. Rosenberg, Editor

Abstract

The annotated genome sequences of prokaryotes seldom include overlapping genes encoded opposite each other by the same stretch of DNA. However, antisense transcription is becoming recognized as a widespread phenomenon in eukaryotes, and examples have been linked to important biological processes. Pseudomonas fluorescens inhabits aquatic and terrestrial environments, and can be regarded as an environmental generalist. The genetic basis for this ecological success is not well understood. In a previous search for soil-induced genes in P. fluorescens Pf0-1, ten antisense genes were discovered. These were termed ‘cryptic’ genes, as they had escaped detection by gene-hunting algorithms, and lacked easily recognizable promoters. In this communication, we designate such genes as ‘non-predicted’ or ‘hidden’. Using reverse transcription PCR, we show that at each of six non-predicted gene loci chosen for study, transcription occurs from both ‘sense’ and ‘antisense’ DNA strands. Further, at least one of these hidden antisense genes, iiv14, encodes a protein, as does the sense transcript, both identified by poly-histidine tags on the C-terminus of the proteins. Mutational and complementation studies showed that this novel antisense gene was important for efficient colonization of soil, and multiple copies in the wildtype host improved the speed of soil colonization. Introduction of a stop codon early in the gene eliminated complementation, further implicating the protein in colonization of soil. We therefore designate iiv14cosA”. These data suggest that, as is the case with eukaryotes, some bacterial genomes are more densely coded than currently recognized.

Author Summary

Sequenced bacterial genomes provide a vast resource for research fields such as pathogenesis, drug discovery, and microbial ecology. Once sequenced, the genes within a genome are predicted using computational and manual methods. An assumption underlying both approaches is that any given length of DNA encodes only a single gene. This concept has been challenged by findings in eukaryotic genomes, and in bacterial plasmids and viruses where it is known that some stretches of DNA specify both ‘sense’ and ‘antisense’ RNA molecules. In prokaryotic cells there is little information regarding the potential of the genome to code two genes within the same stretch of DNA. We show that in the bacterium Pseudomonas fluorescens Pf0-1, both strands of DNA are transcribed at six locations in the genome, and that at one of these locations (iiv14), two different proteins are specified by the same piece of DNA. At the iiv14 locus, we demonstrate that the newly identified gene (antisense to the predicted gene) functions to promote colonization of soil, and name this gene cosA. Our findings indicate that bacterial genomes have more genes than currently thought, and important genes that have escaped detection occupy the same stretch of DNA as known genes.

Introduction

The genetic basis for ecological success is not well understood, yet has practical and fundamental significance. The environmental versatility of P. fluorescens, coupled with secondary metabolism that enables strains to antagonize plant pathogenic fungi or degrade organic pollutants, makes this species an important and relevant model for investigating environmental fitness and applications such as biocontrol and bioremediation. Furthermore, insight into complex ecosystem interactions is enhanced by knowledge of fitness determinants of the individual players.

To expand the understanding of genes functioning to promote soil fitness, we examined gene activity by evaluating expression when introduced into soil [1]. It has been proposed that elevated gene expression in a particular environment likely contributes to fitness of that organism within that environment [2]. Consistent with this suggestion, several studies have identified niche-specific gene activation and subsequently demonstrated that mutations in some of those genes reduced fitness in the environment in question [3][6]. Using in vivo expression technology (IVET) to directly examine gene expression of P. fluorescens Pf0-1 in soil, we identified 22 genes which were up-regulated during growth in soil. Mutations were subsequently introduced into three of these genes, and in each case the mutant showed a defect in soil colonization. Interestingly, ten soil-induced antisense genes were discovered, none of which was predicted by computational annotation of the Pf0-1 genome sequence [1],[7]. These have previously been termed ‘cryptic’ genes as they had escaped detection by gene hunting algorithms [7]. Herein, these are termed ‘hidden’ or ‘non-predicted’ genes.

Although antisense transcription has been reported in eukaryotic systems [8][11], antisense genes in prokaryote genomes have received limited attention, usually as antisense RNA regulators [12],[13]. Previous IVET experiments have suggested the existence of additional sense/antisense transcriptional pairs in bacteria [e.g. 3,6], but these suggestions have not been further investigated.

We chose for further study six loci at which non-predicted antisense genes were reported opposite predicted genes. Here we report the confirmation of sense/antisense transcription at each of these six loci. We demonstrate that both the hitherto unknown gene iiv14, and the putative membrane protein gene found opposite, specify proteins. Further, we show that the gene iiv14 is important for colonization of soil, and therefore name the iiv14 gene cosA.

Our analysis of sense/antisense transcripts in P. fluorescens dramatically increases the number of experimentally verified sense/antisense pairs in bacteria. Our data suggest that bacterial genomes are more densely coded than currently known, and that key traits pertaining to microbial ecology can be specified by hidden genes found antisense to those predicted during genome annotation.

Results

Predicted Genes and Non-Predicted Antisense Genes in P. fluorescens Pf0-1 Are Transcribed

We previously reported the discovery of ten DNA sequences expressed during growth of P. fluorescens Pf0-1 in soil, that were antisense to predicted genes in the genome of Pf0-1 [1]. These ten antisense sequences are not physically linked to each other, and have no similarity to known protein-coding genes [1]. We carried out RT-PCR experiments at six loci using gene specific primers to generate the cDNA, and thus distinguish transcripts produced from the two DNA strands. In laboratory cultures we detected a basal level of expression from both the predicted coding and antisense sequences (Figure 1A), lower than that required for observable dapB reporter gene activity in the initial IVET screen and for survival on minimal medium [1]. In a control experiment at the rpoS locus, transcription was only detectable from the rpoS gene, not the opposite DNA strand (Figure S1). In all RT-PCR experiments, controls in which reverse transcriptase was omitted produced no products. The direct demonstration of transcription of the non-predicted antisense genes confirms their existence, and transcription of the predicted genes on the opposite strand indicates these are not simply mis-annotated.

Figure 1
Transcription, organization, and translation of annotated and non-predicted antisense genes.

Transcriptional Mapping of the Non-Predicted Gene iiv14

The gene iiv14 was chosen for further investigation. The transcribed region of iiv14 identified by RT-PCR is within a potential open reading frame complementary to bases 1092441–1093457 in the Pf0-1 genome sequence, the conceptual translation product of which has no significant matches in GenBank (GenBank accession number CP000094). If the iiv14 transcript spanned the ORF, it would suggest that iiv14 could be translated. The transcription start site was mapped by 5′ RACE to 160 bp upstream of the candidate ORF. RT-PCR experiments with gene-specific primers were used to determine that the 3′ end of the transcribed sequence was at least 210 bp downstream of the presumed stop codon. In addition, the TransTermHP website (http://transterm.cbcb.umd.edu/tt/Pseudomonas_fluorescens_PfO-1.tt) showed a predicted terminator spanning bases 1092229–1092199 of the Pf0-1 genome (starting 193bp downstream of the presumed stop codon), with a confidence score of 41. Thus, the iiv14 transcript is at least 1388 nucleotides long, and the candidate ORF is within the iiv14 transcript (Figure S2).

Both iiv14 and the Predicted Gene Opposite Are Translated

To provide direct evidence for translation of the candidate iiv14 ORF, and the predicted opposite gene (Pfl_0939) (Figure 1B) we added codons for six histidines to the 3′ end of both putative genes, cloned each in plasmid pME6000 (about 15 copies per cell), and transferred these to Pf0-1. Both constructs included the ORF plus upstream sequence likely to contain the native promoter (747 bp for iiv14 and 148 bp for Pfl_0939). Inclusion of the native promoter and expression in Pf0-1 ensured that observed proteins were not artifacts resulting from expression in a heterologous host or under control of a non-native promoter. Western blot analysis using an antibody directed to polyHis demonstrated that both the iiv14 ORF and Pfl_0939 specify proteins, of approximately the expected size (Figure 1C and D). The iiv14 protein was 37 kDa, consistent with the predicted molecular weight (MW) of 38.788 kDa, while the MW of the Pfl_0939 protein was about 70 kDa, slightly less than the expected 80.745 kDa, but not unusual for membrane proteins. Consistent with the fact that iiv14 is upregulated in soil and only expressed at a basal level in laboratory culture, the His-tagged iiv14 protein had to be purified from 1L of culture and concentrated prior to western blot analysis, and films were exposed for 14–16 hours to obtain a clear signal.

The iiv14/Pfl_0939 Locus Is Required for Efficient Soil Colonization

The proposed translation product of iiv14 has no significant matches in BlastP searches of GenBank, providing no functional clues. We therefore sought to examine its importance in a sterile soil growth assay, where its expression is elevated. The iiv14 ORF was deleted by SOE PCR [14] and allele exchange as described [1]. Because iiv14 and Pfl_0939 overlap, the deletion results in a double mutant. Further, deletion of the iiv14 ORF also removes the first 44 bases of Pfl_0940, probably rendering it non-functional. Growth of this deletion mutant in soil was monitored by periodic sampling of colony forming units. The iiv14/0939/0940 mutant was unable to colonize soil as rapidly as Pf0-1 (p<0.001) (Figure 2A, columns 1 and 2). However, between the first and second days when the wild-type had already approached maximum colonization density, the population of the Pf0-1Δiiv14 strain increased 1000 fold (Figure 2A, column 4), such that the cell numbers of both strains were approximately equal after two days of growth. Thus, the iiv14/0939/0940 deletion affected the early part of soil colonization, rather than soil survival per se. In laboratory medium (PMM), both Pf0-1 and the mutant showed approximately equal doubling times (65 min).

Figure 2
Soil colonization experiments.

For the soil growth experiments, cells grown in laboratory culture were used as the inoculum. Thus, the slow initial growth of Pf0-1Δiiv14 could potentially be explained by a defect in adapting from laboratory media to soil. We therefore transferred wild-type and iiv14/0939/0940 mutant bacteria which had grown in soil for seven days into fresh soil, by diluting the previously colonized soil with fresh sterile soil. After one day in fresh soil, the increase of the mutant population was significantly (at least 100-fold) lower than that of Pf0-1 (p<0.005), demonstrating that the deletion of the iiv14 locus results in a soil colonization defect, not a defect in adapting to growth in soil after growth in laboratory culture medium (Figure 2B). Over the period between 24 and 48 hours, the iiv14-locus mutant population increased more than the Pf0-1 population, as the latter had already approached its maximum density in the first 24 hours.

Complementation Experiments Demonstrate iiv14 Is Important in Soil Colonization

To be certain that the deletion of the iiv14 locus caused the reduced soil colonization, we used allele exchange to replace the deleted region with wildtype sequence. To achieve this, region 1092301–1093786 in the Pf0-1 genome, which spans iiv14, was cloned in pSR47s. The resulting plasmid was used in allele exchange as described [1]. Recombinants possessing wildtype sequence were confirmed by PCR. In soil colonization experiments, the replacement strain was indistinguishable from Pf0-1, confirming that the deletion was completely responsible for the colonization defect (data not shown).

Because the two genes iiv14 and Pfl_0939 overlap each other, deletion of one results in loss of the other. To test whether loss of iiv14 was sufficient to explain the soil colonization defect, we cloned the iiv14 ORF and upstream region into plasmid pME6000. Two versions of the complementation clone were constructed, one consisting of 1155bp upstream of the iiv14 ORF (called pME14CF1), and the other containing only 329bp of upstream sequence, including 169bp upstream of the iiv14 transcriptional start site (called pME14CF2) (Figure 3A). Neither of these clones includes the full-length Pfl_0939 coding sequence opposite iiv14. Thus, phenotypes attributed to the presence of the complementation clones are related to restoration of iiv14, not the opposite gene. P. fluorescens strains possessing the vector pME6000 grew slower than plasmid-free strains in soil. Therefore, complementation experiments were followed and analyzed on day two, rather than after one day in soil. The findings were compared to controls of Pf0-1 and Pf0-1Δiiv14 carrying the plasmid vector. As seen with plasmid-free strains (Figure 2), the Pf0-1(pME6000) population increased significantly more (about 10-fold; p<0.001) after one day than did the Pf0-1Δiiv14(pME6000) population (not shown). After two days, the Pf0-1(pME6000) population had increased more than the iiv14 mutant carrying pME6000 (p<0.05) (Figure 3B, column 1 and 2), verifying that the phenotypes associated with plasmid-free strains were true for plasmid-bearing strains. Both pME14CF1 and pME14CF2 complemented the defect in Pf0-1Δiiv14 (Figure 3B; compare column 2 with columns 3 and 4). Relative to Pf0-1Δiiv14 harboring the vector alone, the population of complemented strains increased significantly after two days in soil (p<0.005). To further test whether iiv14 or Pfl_0939 was important in soil colonization, the plasmid constructed for expression of His-tagged Pfl_0939 protein (pME0939His) was utilized in complementation experiments. This plasmid lacks the coding sequence for the first 12 amino acids of iiv14, so only Pfl_0939 protein is made. Unlike pME14CF1 and pME14CF2, the pME0939His failed to restore soil colonization, demonstrating that the defect is not due to the loss of Pfl_0939 (data not shown).

Figure 3
Restoring and enhancing soil colonization with multicopy clones of iiv14.

As described above, deletion of iiv14 also removed 44 base pairs of the Pfl_0940 coding sequence. Plasmids pME14CF1 and pME14CF2 both contain the coding sequence for Pfl_0940 in addition to iiv14 (Figure 3A). To distinguish between the deletion of iiv14 and disruption of Pfl_0940 as the cause for the soil colonization defect, we constructed two additional complementation clones in pME6000, called pME940c1 and pME940c2, both of which include the full length of Pfl_0940, but not iiv14 or Pfl_0939. (Figure 3A). Neither of these clones was capable of restoring the soil growth phenotype of the iiv14/0939/0940 mutant (data not shown). Taken together, the complementation experiments using plasmid-based constructs demonstrate that of the three genes at the iiv14 locus, it is the non-predicted iiv14 that is important in colonization of soil, and was designated cosA.

A Nonsense Codon in cosA Abolishes Complementation

Having demonstrated that cosA is important for soil colonization, and that the gene specifies a protein, we created a nonsense mutation in the gene to determine whether it was the cosA-specified protein or some other feature of the sequence that was important for soil colonization. Codon 17 of the cosA gene was changed from AAG to TAG, after which the mutated DNA region was cloned to create plasmids that were identical to pME14CF1 and pME14CF2, apart from the nonsense mutation. The AAG to TAG change in cosA results in a silent change from leucine codon CTT to leucine codon CTA in the Pfl_0939 sequence on the opposite strand. In the sterile soil colonization assay, the mutation-containing plasmids were unable to complement the colonization defect, relative to Pf0-1(pME6000) (p<0.01) (Figure 3B, columns 5 and 6).

Multicopy cosA Clones Improve Soil Colonization

Deletion and complementation experiments (above) demonstrated that cosA specifies a soil colonization factor. Multiple copies of cosA (on the complementing plasmids) accelerated soil colonization by wild-type Pf0-1. After one day in sterile soil, the population of Pf0-1 carrying pME14CF1 increased significantly more than that of Pf0-1 carrying the vector alone (p<0.05) (Figure 3C, columns 1 and 2). Over the first two days in soil, the median increase of the Pf0-1(pME14CF1) population was more than 15 times that of Pf0-1(pME6000), while the median increase for Pf0-1(pME'14CF2) was about 10 times that of the control (p<0.05 for both) (Figure 3C, columns 4–6).

cosA Mutants Have a Competitive Defect

When Pf0-1ΔcosAkmr was introduced into sterile soil in competition with wild-type Pf0-1Smr, the mutant was not competitive during the first day, and was unable to increase its relative population over subsequent days (Figure 4). This result is in contrast to competitions between differently marked wild-type strains, where each makes up 50% of the soil population after co-inoculation with equal numbers (not shown). The proportion of Pf0-1ΔcosA in the population did not decline over time, confirming that the fitness defect of the mutant is confined to the early colonization period.

Figure 4
Soil competition experiments.

Discussion

Our results demonstrate that there are at least six loci in P. fluorescens Pf0-1 at which both annotated (‘sense’) and ‘antisense’ DNA sequences are transcribed. Further investigation of a chosen example provided conclusive evidence for overlapping protein-coding genes specified opposite each other by the same stretch of DNA. Importantly, a role for this locus in soil colonization was identified, and of the two overlapping genes present, it was the novel non-predicted gene cosA that was required for efficient soil colonization.

These findings suggest that current genome annotations provide an incomplete view of the genetic potential of a given organism, a proposal that is not without precedent in prokaryotic biology. Genes specifying the small ncRNAs affect processes including transcriptional regulation, mRNA stability, and chromosome replication [15]. These are still difficult to predict ab initio in organisms for which there is little information on promoter consensus sequences, although new computational approaches have recently become available [16]. In the prokaryotic horizontally mobile elements, antisense RNA has long been known to control copy number in plasmids, and play a role in bacteriophage development [reviewed in 17]. For prokaryote chromosomal genes, both trans- and cis-encoded antisense RNA regulators are known: e.g. control of glnA in Clostridium acetobutylicum [18], ompF in E. coli [19], and the photosynthesis gene isiA in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 [13].

In eukaryotes, the concept that genomes include numerous sense/antisense gene pairs is becoming increasingly obvious with genome-wide transcriptional studies in yeast [8] and Arabidopsis [10]. Antisense transcripts have been implicated in eye development [20] and control of entry into meiosis in yeast [21]. However, discussion of antisense transcription is limited to possible regulatory roles for antisense RNA [e.g. 8], without consideration of the possibility that they may specify proteins. Genome annotations do not routinely predict the existence of two protein-coding genes on opposite DNA strands, and in fact normally deliberately eliminate predicted overlaps. Moreover, small protein-coding genes can be missed by predictive algorithms. For example, the blr gene in E. coli specifies a 41 residue protein, and was discovered in a sequence believed to be intergenic [22].

The fact that antisense genes have been implicated in important biological functions indicates that more attention should be given to this emerging class of genes. Because they are difficult to predict with existing algorithms, experimental techniques should be adapted to allow their inclusion in genome-wide surveys. Tiling array technology is not biased toward predicted genes, and thus can be used to reveal the existence of non-predicted transcripts, such as those found antisense to known genes. Proteomic studies using accurate mass tags have the capacity to identify any and all proteins produced by a given organism. If data from such experiments are analyzed in an unbiased way, proteins produced from non-predicted genes will be identified. Finally, genetic techniques such as the IVET approach that led to the discovery of the iiv sequences described here [1] are well-suited to the discovery of novel genes. We have argued previously [7] that the frequency with which antisense genes are detected by promoter trapping strongly suggests that they represent real genes. The added advantage of IVET-like experiments is that they provide information regarding up-regulation in a particular environment, which yields clues as to function.

The exact role for cosA in colonization of soil is currently unknown. The cosA deletion mutant has no growth defect in laboratory culture, yet is impaired in soil colonization. Pf0-1 strains possessing the complementing cosA containing plasmids are more rapid colonizers of soil than the control strains (Figure 3C), but do not grow faster than control strains in laboratory media. In fact, Pf0-1 carrying the plasmid pME14CF1 forms colonies on agar surfaces considerably less quickly than control strains.

Two proteins, SetA (20 kDa) and SetB (7 kDa), [23] are thought to be encoded opposite pic, which specifies a serine protease [24] on a pathogenicity island in Shigella flexneri serotype 2 strains [25],[26] and in enteroaggregative E. coli [24],[27]. Thus, this example of probable antisense protein-coding genes evolved in the context of a horizontally mobile element.

We have demonstrated that at one sense/antisense chromosomal locus (cosA), both the predicted ‘sense’ gene (Pfl_0939) and the unpredicted ‘antisense’ gene cosA specify proteins, and it is the non-predicted gene identified initially from gene-expression in soil studies which is important for colonization of soil in a model laboratory system. Thus, antisense genes may be more functionally diverse than simply making regulatory or antisense RNAs. The cosA/Pfl_0939 pair is the first demonstration of overlapping antisense protein-coding genes in a prokaryote genome.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial Strains and Plasmids

Pseudomonas fluorescens Pf0-1 was used as wild-type [28]. The genome sequence of Pseudomonas fluorescens Pf0-1 is available under GenBank accession number CP000094. Pf0-1Δiiv14/cosA was made by deleting bases 1092441 to 1093457 in the Pf0-1 genome by SOE-PCR [14] and allele exchange using plasmid pSR47s [29], as described [1]. E. coli DH5α (F- [var phi]80lacZΔM15 Δ(lacZYA-argF) U169 recA1 endA1 hsdR17 (rk−, mk+) phoA supE44 λ- thi-1 gyrA96 relA1) (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) was used to propagate plasmids. E. coli S17-1 (recA pro hsdR RP4-2-Tc::Mu-Km::Tn7 λ-pir) [30] served as the donor strain in conjugations. P. fluorescens strains were grown in PMM [31] at 30°C, and E. coli strains were grown in LB at 37°C. Plasmid pME6000 [32] was used for complementation studies and to express His-tagged proteins. Streptomycin resistant miniTn7 was constructed by inserting a Smr cassette from pHRP315 [33] into pUCT-mTn7T [34], while kanamycin resistant MiniTn7 is carried on pHRB2 [35]. MiniTn7 constructs were used to introduce Kmr and Smr markers into P. fluorescens strains for competition experiments, as described [36]. Complementation plasmids pME14CF1 and pME14CF2 contain regions 1092301–1094612 and 1092301–1093786 of the Pf0-1 genome, respectively. Plasmids pME940c1 and pME940c2 contain regions 1093208–1093627 and 1093208–1093786, respectively. Plasmid pME14His contains bases 1092438–1094204 of the Pf0-1 genome, and has codons for 6-His introduced immediately upstream of the cosA stop codon. Plasmid pME0939His contains bases 1091084–1093421 of the Pf0-1 genome and has codons for 6-His introduced immediately upstream of the Pfl_0939 stop codon. Pf0-1 sequences in each clone were amplified by PCR. In both cases, the six histidine codons were added by inclusion in the 3′ primer used to amplify the desired sequences.

DNA Manipulation and Sequencing

Recombinant DNA techniques were carried out as described [37]. Restriction and DNA modifying enzymes were purchased from Invitrogen Inc and New England Biolabs (Beverly, MA). Plasmid DNA was purified using the Qiaprep spin miniprep kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). Genomic DNA was prepared using Promega's Wizard Genomic DNA purification kit (Madison, WI). DNA was recovered from agarose gel slices using the Qiaex II gel extraction kit (Qiagen). PCR was carried out with Invitrogen Platinum Taq DNA polymerase High Fidelity. PCR products were cloned with pGEM-T Easy (Promega). Oligonucleotides were purchased from IDT (Coralville, IA) and DNA sequences were determined at the Tufts University Core Facility (Boston, MA).

Introduction of Nonsense Codon into cosA

The complementing regions from pME14CF1 and pME14CF2 were cloned into plasmid pHRB2, which is smaller than the pME6000 vector. Codon 17 was changed from AAG to TAG. This also causes a silent change from leucine codon CTT to leucine codon CTA in Pfl_0939. The nonsense mutation was introduced using the “round the horn” protocol as described (http://openwetware.org/wiki/'Round-the-horn_site-directed_mutagenesis). The DNA polymerase used was KOD Hot Start DNA polymerase (Novagen). Primers used were 14mutF (tgggcTagtccttcgggcttg), which contains the base change to create the nonsense mutation (upper case), and 14wtR2 (tgcctcgtgaaatcgccttcc). The nonsense mutation was verified in resulting plasmids by DNA sequencing. Two mutants of each complementing region were then each recloned into pME6000, and the DNA sequence was again verified. Each of the four resulting plasmids (two for each of CF1 and CF2) were transferred to Pf0-1ΔcosA, and then assessed for complementing ability in the soil assay as described below.

Soil Growth and Survival

Soil growth and survival assays were carried out as described previously [1] using gamma-irradiated, sandy loam soil, of known composition [38]. Briefly, cultures were grown for 16 hours in minimal medium, and diluted to contain approximately 104 cfu/mL. One mL of diluted culture was mixed with 5 g of soil, achieving approximately 50% water-holding capacity. Cultures for competition experiments in soil were adjusted to equal A600 values prior to dilution and then 500 µL of each competitor were used to inoculate soil as above. Population increase was monitored over time by extraction of cells and cfu determination by colony counting on selective media.

RNA Isolation and RT-PCR

P. fluorescens Pf0-1 RNA was isolated using an RNeasy Mini Kit, including the on-column DNaseI treatment (Qiagen). The RNA was then treated with RQ1 DNaseI (Promega) for 1h at 37°C, and re-purified using a Qiagen RNeasy column. For RT-PCR experiments, cDNA was synthesized from 500 ng of total RNA using Superscript III (Invitrogen) and a gene specific primer, at 52°C for 1 h. The cDNA was amplified by PCR using the gene specific primer, and an appropriate partner primer. All RT-PCR experiments were carried out with a negative control consisting of a reverse transcriptase-free reaction.

5′ RACE

5′ RACE was carried out using Invitrogen 5′ RACE system as recommended. Gene specific primers were 14RT-R (5′-ggcctgctgatctttttcag), 14GSP2 (5′-tgttcctgcaaccgaattcg), and 14GSP3 (5′-gggtgaaaagctacctgcac). Products were cloned in pGEM-T Easy, and sequenced using T7 and SP6 primers.

Protein Purification and Western Blotting

Proteins specified by cosA and Pfl_0939 were modified by addition of six histidine codons immediately before the stop codon, by PCR. In all cases, cultures were grown to A600 = 0.4, in PMM. His-tagged CosA protein was extracted and purified from P. fluorescens Pf0-1 carrying plasmid pME14His, using denaturing conditions, as described for E. coli in the QIAexpressionist handbook (Qiagen). Amicon Ultra-4 (10k) (Millipore, Billerica, MA) centrifugal filters were used to concentrate proteins. His-tagged Pfl_0939 was extracted from Pf0-1 carrying plasmid pME0939His, by sonication of cells, and solubilization in SDS buffer [37], resulting in a crude extract which was used in the western blots. Controls for each extraction (Pf0-1 carrying vector alone) were processed in the same way as each experimental preparation.

For western blot analysis, proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE (12.5% acrylamide for CosA-His protein, and 10% for Pfl_0939-His) and transferred to PolyScreen PVDF membrane (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA) using a Biorad Mini Trans-blot Cell (70 V, 1 h). Membranes were processed for immunodetection as described (QIAexpress Detection and Assay Handbook). Mouse monoclonal anti-polyHistidine antibody (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) was diluted 1[ratio]10000 in fresh TTBS (17.2 mM NaCl, 5.1 mM KCl, 24.8 mM tris base, 22 mM HCl (to pH 7.4), 0.1% Tween 20)+3% BSA. HRP-linked antimouse IgG antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA) secondary antibody was diluted 1[ratio]10000 in TTBS plus 10% non-fat milk powder. Detection of antibodies was carried out using Western Lightning Western Blot Chemiluminescence Reagent Plus (Perkin Elmer). Luminescence was detected with Kodak BioMax MR film after 18 h of exposure. Protein molecular weights were estimated by comparison to the BenchMark Pre-Stained Protein Ladder (Invitrogen).

Statistical Analysis

Data from soil experiments were analyzed by the Mann Whitney test using GraphPad Prism 4 software.

Supporting Information

Figure S1

RT-PCR at the rpoS locus using strand-specific primers. Using the same method as was used for the sense/antisense pairs, we carried out RT-PCR at the rpoS locus as a negative control. In contrast to the sense/antisense pairs shown in Figure 1, transcription could only be detected from the annotated (rpoS) gene, and not from the opposite DNA strand, indicating that this approach successfully discriminates between loci in which one or both strands are transcribed.

(4.04 MB TIF)

Figure S2

Mapping the iiv14/cosA transcript. A. Location of the iiv14/cosA transcription start site (+1), identified by 5′RACE, relative to a predicted ORF in the Pf0-1 genome (bases 1093457–1092441) (shaded arrow). Also shown are the approximate locations of the primers (F and R) used to show transcription by RT-PCR. The vertical bar at the 3′ end indicates an arbitrary downstream boundary for searching for the transcription terminator. B. Region from base 1180 to 1503, relative to the +1 site. Gene specific RT-PCR primers 1–4, used to map the 3′ end of iiv14/cosA, are shown. C. RT-PCR to map the 3′ end of the iiv14/cosA transcript. RT was carried out with gene specific primers 1–4, followed by PCR with the gene specific primer and primer ‘F’. RT-PCR products are in lanes marked ‘+’, reverse transcriptase-free negative controls are in ‘−’ lanes, while the ‘C’ lanes show positive control PCR using genomic DNA as the template. D. Region 1374–1434, showing the DNA sequence of a putative transcriptional terminator identified by TransTerm. The ‘t’ underlined in the left stem (arrowed) does not match, and is predicted to bulge out of the stem.

(3.51 MB TIF)

Acknowledgments

We thank Julie Nicoll for help with protein purification, Katherine Corso for advice on statistical analysis, and Andrew Wright for comments on the manuscript.

Footnotes

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

This work was supported by USDA grant 2006-35604-16673 to SBL. MWS was supported in part by a postdoctoral fellowship from the New Zealand Foundation for Research Science and Technology.

References

1. Silby MW, Levy SB. Use of IVET to identify genes important in growth and survival of Pseudomonas fluorescens Pf0-1 in soil: discovery of expressed sequences with novel genetic organization. J Bacteriol. 2004;186:7411–7419. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
2. Rainey PB. Adaptation of Pseudomonas fluorescens to the plant rhizosphere. Environ Microbiol. 1999;1:243–257. [PubMed]
3. Brown DG, Allen C. Ralstonia solanacearum genes induced during growth in tomato: an inside view of bacterial wilt. Mol Microbiol. 2004;53:1641–1660. [PubMed]
4. Camilli A, Mekalanos JJ. Use of recombinase gene fusions to identify Vibrio cholerae genes induced during infection. Mol Microbiol. 1995;18:671–683. [PubMed]
5. Gal M, Preston GM, Massey RC, Spiers AJ, Rainey PB. Genes encoding a cellulosic polymer contribute toward the ecological success of Pseudomonas fluorescens SBW25 on plant surfaces. Mol Ecol. 2003;12:3109–3121. [PubMed]
6. Mahan MJ, Slauch JM, Mekalanos JJ. Selection of bacterial virulence genes that are specifically induced in host tissues. Science. 1993;259:686–688. [PubMed]
7. Silby MW, Rainey PB, Levy SB. IVET experiments in Pseudomonas fluorescens reveal cryptic promoters at loci associated with recognizable overlapping genes. Microbiology. 2004;150:518–520. [PubMed]
8. David L, Huber W, Granovskaia M, Toedling J, Palm CJ, et al. A high-resolution map of transcription in the yeast genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:5320–5325. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Li L, Wang X, Stolc V, Li X, Zhang D, et al. Genome-wide transcription analyses in rice using tiling microarrays. Nat Genet. 2006;38:124–129. [PubMed]
10. Stolc V, Samanta MP, Tongprasit W, Sethi H, Liang S, et al. Identification of transcribed sequences in Arabidopsis thaliana by using high-resolution genome tiling arrays. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:4453–4458. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Yamada K, Lim J, Dale JM, Chen H, Shinn P, et al. Empirical Analysis of Transcriptional Activity in the Arabidopsis Genome. Science. 2003;302:842–846. [PubMed]
12. Dewar SJ, Donachie WD. Antisense transcription of the ftsZ-ftsA gene junction inhibits cell division in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1993;175:7097–7101. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Duhring U, Axmann IM, Hess WR, Wilde A. An internal antisense RNA regulates expression of the photosynthesis gene isiA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:7054–7058. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Horton RM, Hunt HD, Ho SN, Pullen JK, Pease LR. Engineering hybrid genes without the use of restriction enzymes: gene splicing by overlap extension. Gene. 1989;77:61–68. [PubMed]
15. Storz G. An Expanding Universe of Noncoding RNAs. Science. 2002;296:1260–1263. [PubMed]
16. Livny J, Fogel MA, Davis BM, Waldor MK. sRNAPredict: an integrative computational approach to identify sRNAs in bacterial genomes. Nucl Acids Res. 2005;33:4096–4105. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Wagner EGH, Simons RW. Antisense RNA control in bacteria, phages, and plasmids. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1994;48:713–742. [PubMed]
18. Janssen PJ, Jones DT, Woods DR. Studies on Clostridium acetobutylicum glnA promoters and antisense RNA. Mol Microbiol. 1990;4:1575–1583. [PubMed]
19. Mizuno T, Chou M-Y, Inouye M. A unique mechanism regulating gene expression: translational inhibition by a complementary RNA transcript (micRNA). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1984;81:1966–1970. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Alfano G, Vitiello C, Caccioppoli C, Caramico T, Carola A, et al. Natural antisense transcripts associated with genes involved in eye development. Hum Mol Genet. 2005;14:913–923. [PubMed]
21. Hongay CF, Grisafi PL, Galitski T, Fink GR. Antisense transcription controls cell fate in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell. 2006;127:735–745. [PubMed]
22. Wong RSY, McMurry LM, Levy SB. ‘Intergenic’ blr gene in Escherichia coli encodes a 41-residue membrane protein affecting intrinsic susceptibility to certain inhibitors of peptidoglycan synthesis. Mol Microbiol. 2000;37:364–370. [PubMed]
23. Fasano A, Noriega FR, Maneval DRJ, Chanasongcram S, Russell R, et al. Shigella enterotoxin 1: an enterotoxin of Shigella flexneri 2a active in rabbit small intestine in vivo and in vitro. J Clin Invest. 1995;95:2853–2861. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Henderson IR, Czeczulin J, Eslava C, Noriega F, Nataro JP. Characterization of Pic, a secreted protease of Shigella flexneri and enteroaggregative Escherichia coli. Infect Immun. 1999;67:5587–5596. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Al-Hasani K, Rajakumar K, Bulach D, Robins-Browne R, Adler B, et al. Genetic organization of the she pathogenicity island in Shigella flexneri 2a. Microb Pathog. 2001;30:1–8. [PubMed]
26. Rajakumar K, Sasakawa C, Adler B. Use of a novel approach, termed island probing, identifies the Shigella flexneri she pathogenicity island which encodes a homolog of the immunoglobulin A protease-like family of proteins. Infect Immun. 1997;65:4606–4614. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Czeczulin JR, Whittam TS, Henderson IR, Navarro-Garcia F, Nataro JP. Phylogenetic analysis of enteroaggregative and diffusely adherent Escherichia coli. Infect Immun. 1999;67:2692–2699. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
28. Compeau G, Al-Achi BJ, Platsouka E, Levy SB. Survival of rifampin-resistant mutants of Pseudomonas fluorescens and Pseudomonas putida in soil systems. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1988;54:2432–2438. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
29. Matthews M, Roy CR. Identification and subcellular localization of the Legionella pneumophila IcmX protein: a factor essential for establishment of a replicative organelle in eukaryotic host cells. Infect Immun. 2000;68:3971–3982. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
30. Simon R, Priefer U, Puhler A. A broad host range mobilisation system for in vivo engineering: Transposon mutagenesis in gram-negative bacteria. Biotechnology. 1983;1:748–751.
31. Kirner S, Krauss S, Sury G, Lam ST, Ligon JM, et al. The non-haem chloroperoxidase from Pseudomonas fluorescens and its relationship to pyrrolnitrin biosynthesis. Microbiology. 1996;142:2129–2135. [PubMed]
32. Maurhofer M, Reimmann C, Schmidli-Sacherer P, Heeb S, Haas D, et al. Salicylic acid biosynthetic genes expressed in Pseudomonas fluorescens strain P3 improve the induction of systemic resistance in tobacco against tobacco necrosis virus. Phytopathology. 1998;88:678–684. [PubMed]
33. Parales RE, Harwood CS. Construction and use of a new broad-host-range lacZ transcriptional fusion vector, pHRP309, for Gram- bacteria. Gene. 1993;133:23–30. [PubMed]
34. Choi KH, Gaynor JB, White KG, Lopez C, Bosio CM, et al. A Tn7-based broad-range bacterial cloning and expression system. Nat Methods. 2005;2:443–448. [PubMed]
35. Monds RD, Newell PD, Gross RH, O'Toole GA. Phosphate-dependent modulation of c-di-GMP levels regulates Pseudomonas fluorescens Pf0-1 biofilm formation by controlling secretion of the adhesin LapA. Mol Microbiol. 2007;63:656–679. [PubMed]
36. Zuber S, Carruthers F, Keel C, Mattart A, Blumer C, et al. GacS sensor domains pertinent to the regulation of exoproduct formation and to the biocontrol potential of Pseudomonas fluorescens CHA0. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2003;16:634–644. [PubMed]
37. Sambrook J, Russell DW. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor, New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2001.
38. Deflaun MF, Tanzer AS, McAteer AL, Marshall B, Levy SB. Development of an adhesion assay and characterization of an adhesion-deficient mutant of Pseudomonas fluorescens. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1990;56:112–119. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from PLoS Genetics are provided here courtesy of Public Library of Science
PubReader format: click here to try

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...