![]() | ![]() |
Formats: |
||||||||||||
Copyright © 1999, The National Academy of Sciences Medical Sciences Increased levels of plasma lysosomal enzymes in patients with Lowe syndrome Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110 *To whom reprint requests should be addressed at: Washington University School of Medicine, Division of Hematology, 660 South Euclid Avenue, Campus Box 8125, St. Louis, MO 63110. E-mail: phil/at/im.wustl.edu. Contributed by Philip W. Majerus Accepted September 27, 1999. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract Lowe syndrome is an X-linked disorder that has a complex phenotype that includes progressive renal failure and blindness. The disease is caused by mutations in an inositol polyphosphate 5-phosphatase designated OCRL. It has been shown that the OCRL protein is found on the surface of lysosomes and that a renal tubular cell line deficient in OCRL accumulated substrate phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate. Because this lipid is required for vesicle trafficking from lysosomes, we postulate that there is a defect in lysosomal enzyme trafficking in patients with Lowe syndrome that leads to increased extracellular lysosomal enzymes and might lead to tissue damage and contribute to the pathogenesis of the disease. We have measured seven lysosomal enzymes in the plasma of 15 patients with Lowe syndrome and 15 age-matched male controls. We find a 1.6- to 2.0-fold increase in all of the enzymes measured. When the data was analyzed by quintiles of activity for all of the enzymes, we found that 95% of values in the lowest quintile come from normal subjects whereas in the highest quintile 85% of the values are from patients with Lowe syndrome. The increased enzyme levels are not attributable to renal insufficiency because there was no difference in enzyme activity in the four patients with the highest creatinine levels compared with the six patients with the lowest creatinine values. Keywords: 5-phosphatase, inositol signaling, phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate, X-linked disorder, enzyme trafficking Lowe syndrome is a disorder characterized by cognitive impairment with a discrete behavioral phenotype including temper tantrums, irritability, complex repetitive behaviors, and unusual mannerisms. Cataracts and severe visual impairment are present at birth, and most patients are blind eventually (1, 2). There is severe renal fanconi syndrome with progressive renal impairment. Growth failure is a prominent feature of the disorder, with most boys attaining a height of less than 5 feet. The disease is caused by mutations in an X-linked gene that encodes the OCRL (oculocerebrorenal:Lowe) protein (3–8). OCRL is an inositol polyphosphate 5-phosphatase that hydrolyzes all of the substrates of the enzymes in this family, including the inositol phosphates inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate and inositol 1,3,4,5-tetrakisphosphate and the inositol lipids phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate [PtdIns(4, 5)P2] and phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate (9). A study using extracts from a renal proximal tubule cell line suggests that OCRL is mainly a lipid phosphatase (10). Thus, cultured cells from a patient accumulate PtdIns(4,5)P2 despite the fact that these cells contain several other isozymes of inositol polyphosphate 5-phosphatase. This result implies that the different isozymes have discrete functions that are nonredundant. In renal proximal tubule cell lines from normal subjects, OCRL was shown to be localized to lysosomes by immunofluorescence (10). In the absence of OCRL, lysosomes may therefore accumulate PtdIns(4, 5)P2. PtdIns(4, 5)P2 is important for the formation of clathrin coated vesicles on lysosomes (11). Thus, in the presence of excess PtdIns(4, 5)P2 in lysosomal membranes, there may be aberrant or increased membrane trafficking. We postulate that, in the case of Lowe syndrome, there may be mistrafficking of lysosomal enzymes, resulting in increased extracellular release of lysosomal enzymes. In the face of cells being continuously bathed in an excess of such hydrolytic enzymes, there may be tissue damage that contributes to the phenotype seen in Lowe syndrome. To evaluate this hypothesis, we have measured a panel of seven lysosomal enzymes in the plasma of boys with Lowe syndrome and age-matched male controls. Methods Lysosomal Enzyme Assays. Substrate 4-methylumbelliferyl-glycosides for each of the enzymes measured were purchased from Sigma. Assays were carried out at 37°C in 0.2 ml containing 75 mM sodium acetate (pH 4.75), substrate ranging from 0.0125 mM to 1.25 mM, and plasma. Each plasma sample was assayed for 15, 30, and 60 min. Reactions were stopped by the addition of 2 ml of 0.25 M glycine (pH 10.3). All assays were shown to be linear with time and plasma amount. Results are expressed as nanomoles of 4-methylumbelliferone formed/minute/milliliter of plasma. Plasma creatinine values were measured in the clinical laboratory of Barnes-Jewish Hospital. Patients and Controls. Patients were recruited for the study with the assistance of the parental support group The Lowe Syndrome Association, Inc. Letters inviting participation were sent to the parents of boys aged 2 to 20 along with informed consent forms and a letter to the patients’ physicians instructing them how to handle the blood samples. Blood (5 ml) was collected into EDTA and was centrifuged immediately, and the plasma was removed and frozen. Samples were shipped frozen to St. Louis and were stored at −80°C until thawed for assay. One sample was collected in our laboratory from a patient who lived nearby. Control blood samples were obtained from the outpatient hematology laboratory of St. Louis Children’s Hospital from EDTA anticoagulated samples that were used for routine CBC. Control samples were taken to match the ages of the Lowe syndrome subjects from normal complete blood count samples. The control subjects had no chronic illness but were either normal or were seen for follow-up from fractures, other orthopedic problems, seizure disorder, or post-repair of a variety of congenital anomalies. Samples of both patients and controls were further identified only by number. The protocol and informed consent documents were approved by the Washington University Human Studies Committee. Results In preliminary studies, we measured lysosomal enzyme activity in fresh control plasma, in plasma frozen at −20°C for up to 4 months, and in plasma stored overnight at room temperature. There were no significant differences in the results obtained from these sources, and, thus, we instituted a study. We have measured seven lysosomal enzymes in 15 boys with Lowe syndrome and 15 age-matched male controls. All assays were done by the fluorometric measurement of released 4-methyl umbelliferone from the appropriate substrate. We measured β-d-glucuronidase, α-l-fucosidase, α-d-mannosidase, N-acetyl-β-d-glucosaminidase, N-acetyl-α-d-glucosaminidase, β-d-galactosidase, and α-d-galactosidase. The levels of all seven enzymes were increased in Lowe syndrome plasma from 1.6- to 2-fold, as shown in Fig. Fig.1.1
Discussion It is not clear how a defect in an enzyme of the inositol phosphate signaling pathway could lead to the complex phenotype of Lowe syndrome. The fact that the protein is widely expressed in essentially all tissues (12) and organs with the exception of blood cells while the defects are noted mainly in kidney, brain, and eye is also hard to understand. The OCRL gene has been deleted in mice by homologous recombination, but this experiment failed to yield insight into the disease because the deficient mice have no obvious phenotype (13). It would be of interest to study lysosomal trafficking in these mice or cell lines derived from them. Our previous finding that the OCRL phosphatase is localized to lysosomes in renal proximal tubule cell lines and that the enzyme is primarily a PtdIns(4, 5)P2 phosphatase in these cells suggested that there might be a defect in lysosomal enzyme trafficking in Lowe syndrome. The current results support this hypothesis, although there is little precedent for lysosomal hydrolases evoking tissue damage. There are suggestions that lysosomal hydrolases may play a role in cataract development, one of the phenotypes of Lowe syndrome (14). Muccolipidosis III is a disorder of lysosomal enzyme trafficking, and these patients have marked elevations of many lysosomal enzymes (15). The phenotype of this disorder is quite severe but does not include cataracts or renal insufficiency. An important mechanistic difference in this disorder is that lysosomal enzymes are secreted directly from the Golgi apparatus and not from the lysosomes, as we postulate happens in Lowe syndrome. Active hydrolytic enzymes secreted from lysosomes might be expected to cause more tissue damage than unactivated lysosomal proenzymes secreted from the Golgi (16). The most convincing method for proving that release of lysosomal enzymes accounts for pathogenesis in Lowe syndrome would be to treat patients with inhibitors of lysosomal hydrolases and demonstrate improvement in their clinical condition. To date, no such inhibitors are available to test this strategy. An alternative approach that we are currently pursuing is to stably transfect an immortalized lymphocyte cell line that does not express OCRL with a construct of OCRL in which expression is controlled by tetracycline. In this way, lysosomal enzyme trafficking can be evaluated in the presence and absence of expression of OCRL. Acknowledgments We especially thank the Lowe Syndrome Association, Inc. and the boys and their families who cooperated with us to make this research possible. We also thank Drs. Linton Traub, Joseph Miletich, David Wilson, and Stuart Kornfeld for their helpful advice and Cecil Buchanan for excellent technical assistance. This research was supported by National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute Grants HL 16634 and HL 55672. References 1. Charnas L R, Bernardini I, Radar D, Hoeg J M, Gahl W A. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:1318–1325. [PubMed] 2. Kenworthy L, Charnas L. Am J Med Genet. 1995;59:283–290. [PubMed] 3. Attree O, Olivos I, Okabe I, Bailey C, Nelson D, Lewis R, McInnes R, Nussbaum R L. Nature (London). 1992;358:239–242. [PubMed] 4. Leahey A M, Charnas L R, Nussbaum R L. Hum Mol Genet. 1993;4:461–463. [PubMed] 5. Lin T, Orrison B, Leahey A M, Suchy S, Bernard D, Lewis R, Nussbaum R. Am J Hum Genet. 1997;60:1384–1388. [PubMed] 6. Kubota T, Sakurai A, Arakawa K, Shimazu M, Wakui K, Furihata K, Fukushima Y. Clin Genet. 1998;54:199–202. [PubMed] 7. Lin T, Orrison B M, Suchy S F, Lewis R A, Nussbaum R L. Mol Genet Metab. 1998;64:58–61. [PubMed] 8. Satre V, Monnier N, Berthoin F, Ayuso C, Joannard A, Jouk P S, Lopez-Pajares I, Megabarne A, Philippe H J, Plauchu H, et al. Am J Hum Genet. 1999;65:68–76. [PubMed] 9. Zhang X, Jefferson A B, Auethavekiat V, Majerus P W. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92:4853–4856. [PubMed] 10. Zhang X, Hartz P, Philip E, Racusen L C, Majerus P W. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:1574–1582. [PubMed] 11. Arneson L S, Kunz J, Anderson R A, Traub L M. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:17794–17805. [PubMed] 12. Olivos-Glander I M, Janne P A, Nussbaum R L. Am J Hum Genet. 1995;57:817–823. [PubMed] 13. Janne P A, Suchy S F, Bernard D, MacDonald M, Crawley J, Grinberg A, Wynshaw-Boris A, Westphal H, Nussbaum R L. J Clin Invest. 1998;101:2042–2053. [PubMed] 14. Hayasaka S. Surv Ophthalmol. 1983;27:245–258. [PubMed] 15. Hultberg B, Isaksson A, Sjoblad S, Ockerman P A. Clin Chim Acta. 1980;100:33–38. [PubMed] 16. Kornfeld S, Sly W S. In: The Metabolic and Molecular Bases of Inherited Disease. Scriver C R, Beaudet A L, Sly W S, Valle D, editors. New York: McGraw–Hill; 1995. pp. 2495–2504. |
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||
N Engl J Med. 1991 May 9; 324(19):1318-25.
[N Engl J Med. 1991]Am J Med Genet. 1995 Nov 20; 59(3):283-90.
[Am J Med Genet. 1995]Nature. 1992 Jul 16; 358(6383):239-42.
[Nature. 1992]Am J Hum Genet. 1999 Jul; 65(1):68-76.
[Am J Hum Genet. 1999]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 May 23; 92(11):4853-6.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995]N Engl J Med. 1991 May 9; 324(19):1318-25.
[N Engl J Med. 1991]Am J Hum Genet. 1995 Oct; 57(4):817-23.
[Am J Hum Genet. 1995]J Clin Invest. 1998 May 15; 101(10):2042-53.
[J Clin Invest. 1998]Surv Ophthalmol. 1983 Jan-Feb; 27(4):245-58.
[Surv Ophthalmol. 1983]Clin Chim Acta. 1980 Jan 1; 100(1):33-8.
[Clin Chim Acta. 1980]