![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||
Copyright 2008, The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research Felodipine Reduces Cardiac Expression of IL-18 and Perivascular Fibrosis in Fructose-Fed Rats Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Remodeling and Function Research, Chinese Ministry of Education and Chinese Ministry of Public Health; Department of Cardiology, QiLu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China Address correspondence and reprint requests to Wei Zhang, Department of Cardiology, Shandong University QiLu Hospital, 250012, 107# West Wenhua Road, Jinan, China. Phone: 0086-531-82963056; Fax: 0086-531-86169356; E-mail: professor-zhangwei/at/163.com. Received February 25, 2008; Accepted May 20, 2008. Abstract Metabolic syndrome is associated with accelerated macrovascular and microvascular coronary disease, cardiomyopathy, and elevated inflammatory status. To determine whether metabolic syndrome-associated elevation of the inflammatory cytokine interleukin-18 (IL-18) in serum and cardiac tissue, and its potential sequelae could be attenuated pharmacologically, we studied fructose-fed rats. The fructose-fed rats exhibited increases in systolic blood pressure (SBP), body weight, heart weight, left ventricular weight, and blood insulin. Serum IL-18 levels in these rats were also elevated significantly. These changes were significantly different compared to those in control rats. Perivascular fibrosis around coronary arterioles was evident in the fructose-fed rats, accompanied by a paralleled increase in IL-18 by immunohistochemical analysis and real time polymerase chain reaction. Felodipine attenuated the increased levels in serum IL-18 and cardiac IL-18 mRNA as well as coronary perivascular fibrosis. Thus, augmented IL-18 in serum and cardiac tissue in metabolic syndrome may contribute to the coronary perivascular fibrosis; felodipine administration can attenuate the inflammatory and fibrosis process. INTRODUCTION Accelerated coronary atherosclerosis contributes to the increased mortality associated with metabolic syndrome (1,2), a cluster of metabolic disorders including central adiposity, insulin resistance, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and proinflammatory state (3–5). In metabolic syndrome patients, these coronary microvascular changes are common, often preceded by obesity and insulin resistance (6), which are considered the most prominent pathogenic changes underlying metabolic syndrome (7,8). Perivascular arteriolar fibrosis is one of the landmark pathological changes in patients with myocardial ischemia in the absence of angiographically demonstrable stenosis (9). Recently, activated innate immunity and chronic inflammation have been causally implicated in metabolic syndrome-associated atherogenesis (10–12). Interleukin-18 (IL-18), a member of the IL-1 cytokine superfamily, is recognized as an important regulator of innate and acquired immune responses (13,14). IL-18 is a potent proinflammatory cytokine, and plays an important role in plaque destabilization (15). Prospective studies have shown an association of circulating IL-18 levels with cardiovascular death in patients with coronary artery disease (16,17). Recent studies suggest that IL-18 levels may be elevated in metabolic disturbances, although its relationship with metabolic syndrome has not been formally studied. Elevated IL-18 levels are found to be associated with increased adiposity and insulin resistance in obese premenopausal women (18,19). IL-18 concentrations are increased in acute hyperglycemia (20) and type 2 diabetes (21,22). Moreover, IL-18 may influence vascular remodeling (23,24). However, it is not known whether IL-18 is involved in coronary microvascular changes in metabolic syndrome. The present study was designed to characterize IL-18 expression in serum or tissues and the relationship of that expression to coronary microvascular changes in fructose-fed rats. We established the fructose-fed rat model, which simulates the human metabolic syndrome (25,26). We further determined whether the calcium channel blockade (CCB) felodipine, known to attenuate inflammation (27,28), reduces IL-18 expression and perivascular fibrosis in the fructose-fed rats. MATERIALS AND METHODS Experimental Animals All rats were handled in accordance with the Animal Management Rules of the Ministry of Health, People’s Republic of China (documentation 55, 2001) and experimental protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care Committee of Shandong University. Male Wistar-Kyoto rats were 6 wks old, and were purchased from the Animal Research Institution of Shandong University School of Medicine. They were housed in individual cages at room temperature and a 12-h light 12-h dark cycle (12:12 L:D) (7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.) was applied to the animal housing. Rats were randomly assigned to two groups: control (n = 12) and fructose (n = 18) groups. Rats in the fructose group were given 10% fructose in drinking water and standard chow diet (16% protein, 8% fat, 50% carbohydrate, 22% trace elements) ad libitum, whereas rats in the control group had free access to tap water and standard chow diet. After being fed for 8 mos, 9 rats of the fructose group were given 5 mg/kg/day felodipine (felodipine group) by intubation between 10:00 a.m. and 10:30 a.m. for 6 wks. The control group received an equal volume of drug-free vehicle (normal saline solution). The dose was adjusted each wk based on body weight calculation for each animal. Rats in the fructose and the felodipine groups were continued on 10% fructose water throughout the treatment period. Blood Pressure Measurement Systolic blood pressure (SBP) was measured every 2 wks by tail cuff plethysmography (29,30). Measurements were obtained with the rats restrained without anesthesia in a plastic chamber. The rats were preconditioned to the experimental procedure before the actual experimental measurements. A pneumatic pulse transducer positioned on the ventral surface of the tail distal to the occlusion cuff detected the return pulse after a slow deflation of the cuff. Cuff pressure was determined by a pneumatic pulse transducer with a programmed electrosphygmomanometer (RBP1, Clinical Medicine Institute, Peking, China) and pulses were recorded on a physiograph. A minimum of three measurements were taken at each session, and the SBP registered was the average of the three readings. Biochemical Analyses After the rats were fasted for 14 h, blood samples were collected from the carotid sinus at baseline and at the end of the experiment period before the rats were killed. Glucose concentrations were measured by the glucose oxidase method. Aliquots of sera were assayed for cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations according to standard methods. Insulin was determined by a solid phase, sandwich immunoassay. Insulin resistance was evaluated using HOMA-IR index, defined as fasting glucose (mmol/L) × fasting insulin (μU/mL) divided by 22.5 (31). Serum IL-18 level was measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Uscnlife, Missouri City, TX, USA) according to the instructions supplied by the manufacturer and met the quality assurance and quality control established for test validity. The intra-assay and inter-assay coefficients of variations (CVs) were 6.1% and 6.5% for IL-18. MORPHOMETRIC ANALYSIS All rats were killed under deep anesthetization (2.0% isoflurane) according to institutional guidelines for animal care and use. The hearts were excised and rinsed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The left ventricle was separated from the right ventricle, the atria, and the great vessels, and was cut into five pieces perpendicular to the long axis. The tissue was fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and dehydrated with graded concentrations of alcohol for embedding in paraffin. Paraffin sections (5 μm) from each heart were stained with Masson’s trichrome (32). Photomicrographs were quantified with NIH Image software to assess the area of perivascular fibrosis, which was calculated as the ratio of the fibrosis area (collagen deposition stained with aniline blue) surrounding the vessel to the total vessel area. Approximately 10 vessels were examined in each heart. The dispersion present in the fibrosis area-to-lumen or fibrosis-to-media ratios was considered. Immunohistochemistry Paraffin sections were cut in 5 μm widths, deparaffinized, and dehydrated. Endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked by treatment with 0.5% H2O2 in methanol for 30 min. To measure IL-18 levels in cardiac tissue, a polyclonal goat IgG anti-rat IL-18 antibody (R&D System Inc, Minneapolis, MN, USA) at a 1:200 dilution was used. After washing in phosphate-buffered saline for 10 min, the sections were incubated with secondary goat anti-mouse antibody and visualized with 3-amino-9-ethyl car-bazole (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) as substrate. The nuclei were counter-stained with hematoxylin, and the sections were analyzed at a magnification of ×400 under a light microscope equipped with an image analyzer (Image Pro Plus, Media Cybernetics, PA, Italy). Quantitative assessment of intensity of IL-18 staining was performed as integrated optical density (IOD) by two observers blinded with respect to the groups of animals. Isotope IgG as the primary antibody was used as a control for comparison. Expression of IL-18 mRNA Total RNA was extracted from left ventricles using TRIzol reagents (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. After DNase (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) treatment, 1 μg of total RNA was reverse transcribed using random primers and M-MLV reverse transcriptase (Promega). A 2 μL aliquot of the cDNA was amplified by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in 20 μL of PCR mixture using SYBR Green Master Mix with the Light Cycler 2.0 (LCS4 4.0.0.23; Roche, Basel, Switzerland). The PCR primer for IL-18 amplification was forward 5′-AAA CCC GCC TGT GTT CGA-3′ and reverse 5′-ATC AGT CTG GTC TGG GAT TCG T-3′. Expression levels were normalized to the reference gene GAPDH (forward 5′-ATG TAT CCG TTG TGG ATC TGA C-3′; reverse 5′-CCT GCT TCA CCA CCT TCT TG-3′). At the end of each PCR run, the data were analyzed automatically by the system, and amplification plots were obtained. Melting curve analysis was performed to assess the specificity of the PCR products. To correct the efficiency of complementary deoxyribonucleic acid synthesis, the amounts of each measured mRNA were divided by the amounts of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase mRNA as an internal standard (33). All amplification reactions were performed in triplicate. Statistical Analysis Data are expressed as mean ± SD. Statistical significance of differences between three or more groups was determined by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Bonferroni multiple-comparison correction. Levels of serum IL-18 and myocardium IL-18 mRNA expression were correlated with perivascular fibrosis using the Pearson correlation coefficient. A two-tailed probability of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. SPSS version 13.0 for Windows was used in analysis. RESULTS Blood Pressure Changes At baseline, SBP was similar in the control and the fructose groups (111.31 ± 6.22 compared with 113.24 ± 7.07 mmHg). However, SBP increased significantly (138.66 ± 6.43 compared with 115.60 ± 3.30 mmHg, P < 0.01) in fructose-fed rats during the first 8 months. When rats were treated with felodipine, SBP was significantly reduced (115.20 ± 10.66 compared with 137.95 ± 6.01 mmHg, P < 0.01) to a level similar to the level in the control group. Body Weight, Heart Weight, and Left Ventricular Weight Fructose-fed rats exhibited an increase in body weight compared with that of controls (Figure 1
Biochemical Parameters and IL-18 Level in Blood Insulin (17.34 ± 3.08 compared with 8.94 ± 2.03, P < 0.01), triglycerides (1.34 ± 0.74 compared with 0.81 ± 0.24, P < 0.05) and HOMA-IR index (4.15 ± 1.45 compared with 2.13 ± 0.66, P < 0.05) were increased in the fructose group (Table 1). However, glucose and cholesterol levels were not different between fructose-fed and control rats. While felodipine significantly attenuated the increases in insulin level (8.98 ± 2.91 compared with 17.34 ± 3.08, P < 0.01) and HOMA-IR index (2.16 ± 0.89 compared with 4.15 ± 1.45, P < 0.05), it had no effect on triglycerides. Serum IL-18 levels (59.53 ± 6.46 compared with 35.47 ± 6.58, P < 0.01) were significantly higher in fructose-fed rats compared to controls. Felodipine treatment attenuated the increase in serum IL-18 level in fructose-fed rats (50.76 ± 5.66 compared with 59.53 ± 6.46, P < 0.05).
Morphological and Immunohistochemical Changes Considerable fibrosis was observed around coronary arterioles in fructose-fed rats (Figure 2
While only weak immunoreactivity of IL-18 was detected around microvessels of the control rats, strong signals were detected in endothelium of the microvessels in fructose-fed rats (Figure 3
IL-18 mRNA Expression The abundance of IL-18 relative to GAPDH in the hearts of fructose-fed rats and controls is shown in Figure 4
Notably, in the present study, serum IL-18 levels and IL-18 mRNA expression were highly and significantly correlated with the perivascular fibrosis in the fructose group but not in the other two groups (Figure 5A–5D
DISCUSSION High dietary intake of fructose has rapidly become an important causative factor in the development of metabolic syndrome (34). Inflammation and activated innate immunity are thought to play an important role in the development of atherosclerosis and diabetes, which may represent a unifying link between metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease (10–12). Several cross-sectional studies have shown that acute-phase reactants such as C-reactive protein (CRP), and cytokines such as IL-6 and tumor necrosis factor-α are associated with features of the metabolic syndrome such as body mass index, measures of insulin resistance, hypertension, and dyslipidemia (35–38). We found that IL-18 levels were increased in rats with metabolic syndrome, consistent with observations by others (39) who demonstrated a strong association between IL-18 and metabolic syndrome in humans. However the association diminished after accounting for traditional cardiovascular risk factors (40). The mechanisms for the link between inflammation and metabolic syndrome are not fully understood. One explanation is that adipose tissue in obese persons with the metabolic syndrome releases increased amounts of cytokines into the circulation (41). Another possibility is that insulin resistance per se is responsible for a higher production of cytokines (42). We found that fructose-fed rats exhibit increased perivascular fibrosis, which may be associated with altered IL-18 expression. The increased IL-18 is hypothesized to have induced fibroblast activity, thereby stimulating the synthesis of extracellular matrix (43). Other pathways, such as increased production of SMC-derived IFN-γ, also could be responsible for IL-18-associated perivascular fibrosis (44). Diabetic patients are frequently at paucity of coronary collateral circulation, which suggests a limited angiogenesis (45,46). Altered characteristics of left ventricular capillaries in genetically obese diabetic rats have been reported (47). In a preliminary study, we also characterized capillary profiles in fructose-fed rats. Remodeling appeared to be constrained in fructose-fed rats (unpublished observations). In the present study, IL-18 in serum and cardiac tissue in fructose-fed rats that received felodipine was reduced and hence the perivascular fibrosis was modulated. This appears to be a cardiac-specific effect of felodipine. Recently several suggest that some dihydropyridine-type calcium channel blockers, such as nifedipine (48), nilvadipine (49), and benidipine (50), have a direct beneficial effect by inhibiting the nuclear translocation and DNA-binding activity of nuclear factor-κB, which plays a central role in this process by regulating the expression of several proinflammatory genes. Ding and Vaziri (51) demonstrated that felodipine increased nitric oxide (NO) production, endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) activity, and eNOS protein expression in cultured endothelial cells from the rat aorta. In their study, they suggest that the enhancement of endothelial NO production could account for the reported improvement in endothelial function associated with calcium channel blocker in the case of both renal and hypertensive disorders. These mechanisms may contribute to the favorable effects of calcium channel blocker seen in patients at high cardiovascular risk. The most important finding in our study is the role of felodipine in attenuating the metabolic syndrome-associated proinflammatory changes, hence the reduction in myocardial fibrosis. This direct effect may be independent of its blood pressure regulatory effects and suggests a therapeutic modality of the calcium channel blocker in treatment of cardiovascular complications in metabolic syndrome patients. Our study is limited in several aspects. First, the present study did not have an additional antihypertensive treatment group using other calcium channel blockers or other blood pressure-controlling agents. Therefore, our data are not conclusive in ruling out the possibility that the blood pressure lowering may contribute to the attenuation of perivascular fibrosis. However, we speculate that the effect felodipine on cardiac perivascular fibrosis is less likely due to the blood pressure regulation. This hypothesis is supported by a recent finding in diabetic rats which were normotensive. Calcium channel blocker benidipine normalized the endothelin system and reduced cardiac perivascular fibrosis (52), indicating that this effect is independent of the blood pressure-lowering outcome. Second, it is not clarified in the current study whether IL-18 directly affects collagen synthesis or degradation, or both. In summary, this study demonstrates that augmented IL-18 in serum and cardiac tissue in metabolic syndrome may contribute to the coronary perivascular fibrosis. Calcium channel blocker felodipine administration can attenuate the inflammatory and fibrosis process. Thus, felodipine could potentially be used in humans with multiple cardiovascular risk factors. Obviously, further prospective studies relating IL-18 to metabolic syndrome would be informative. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of P. R. China (No. 30670874 to W Zhang) and by the research funding of Astra-Zeneca Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., China (QD02 to W Zhang). Footnotes Online address: http://www.molmed.org REFERENCES 1. Bonora E, et al. Carotid atherosclerosis and coronary heart disease in the metabolic syndrome: prospective data from the Bruneck study. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:1251–7. [PubMed] 2. Reilly MP, et al. Measures of insulin resistance add incremental value to the clinical diagnosis of metabolic syndrome in association with coronary atherosclerosis. Circulation. 2004;110:803–9. [PubMed] 3. Reaven GM. Banting lecture 1988: role of insulin resistance in human disease. Diabetes. 1988;37:1595–607. [PubMed] 4. Meigs JB. Invited commentary: insulin resistance syndrome? Syndrome X? Multiple metabolic syndrome? A syndrome at all? Factor analysis reveals patterns in the fabric of correlated metabolic risk factors. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;152:908–12. [PubMed] 5. Sakkinen PA, Wahl P, Cushman M, Lewis MR, Tracy RP. Clustering of procoagulation, inflammation, and fibrinolysis variables with metabolic factors in insulin resistance syndrome. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;152:897–907. [PubMed] 6. Zaman AK, et al. Salutary effects of attenuation of angiotensin II on coronary perivascular fibrosis associated with insulin resistance and obesity. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2004;37:525–35. [PubMed] 7. Reaven GM. Role of insulin resistance in human disease. Diabetes. 1988;37:1595–606. [PubMed] 8. Haffner S, Taegtmeyer H. Epidemic obesity and the metabolic syndrome. Circulation. 2003;108:1541–5. [PubMed] 9. Murakami H, Urabe K, Nishimura M. Inappropriate microvascular constriction produced transient ST-segment elevation in patients with syndrome X. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32:1287–94. [PubMed] 10. Pickup JC, Mattock MB, Chusney GD, Burt D. NIDDM as a disease of the innate immune system: association of acute-phase reactants and IL-6 with metabolic syndrome X. Diabetologia. 1997;40:1286–92. [PubMed] 11. Pickup JC. Inflammation and activated innate immunity in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:813–23. [PubMed] 12. Biondi-Zoccai GG, Abbate A, Liuzzo G, Biasucci LM. Atherothrombosis, inflammation, and diabetes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41:1071–7. [PubMed] 13. Okamura H, Tsutsui H, Kashiwamura S, Yoshimoto T, Nakanishi K. Interleukin-18: a novel cytokine that augments both acquired and innate immunity. Adv Immunol. 1998;70:281–312. [PubMed] 14. Gracie JA, Robertson SE, McInnes IB. Interleukin-18. J Leukoc Biol. 2003;73:213–24. [PubMed] 15. Mallat Z, et al. Expression of IL-18 in human atherosclerotic plaques and relation to plaque instability. Circulation. 2001;104:1598–603. [PubMed] 16. Blankenberg S, et al. AtheroGene Investigators. Interleukin-18 is a strong predictor of cardiovascular death in stable and unstable angina. Circulation. 2002;106:24–30. [PubMed] 17. Blankenberg S, et al. PRIME Study Group. IL-18 and the risk of coronary heart disease in European men: the Prospective Epidemiological Study of Myocardial Infarction (PRIME). Circulation. 2003;108:2453–9. [PubMed] 18. Esposito K, et al. Weight loss reduces IL-18 levels in obese women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87:3864–6. [PubMed] 19. Escobar-Morreale HF, Botella-Carretero JI, Villuendas G, Sancho J, San Millan JL. Serum IL-18 concentrations are increased in the polycystic ovary syndrome: relationship to insulin resistance and to obesity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89:806–11. [PubMed] 20. Esposito K, et al. Inflammatory cytokine concentrations are acutely increased by hyperglycemia in humans: role of oxidative stress. Circulation. 2002;106:2067–72. [PubMed] 21. Esposito K, et al. Cytokine milieu tends toward inflammation in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:1647. [PubMed] 22. Aso Y, Okumura K, Takebayashi K, Wakabayashi S, Inukai T. Relationships of plasma IL-18 concentrations to hyperhomocysteinemia and carotid intimal-media wall thickness in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:2622–7. [PubMed] 23. Stetler-Stevenson WG. Matrix metalloproteinases in angiogenesis: a moving target for therapeutic intervention. J Clin Invest. 1999;103:1237–41. [PubMed] 24. El Messal M, et al. Elevated serum levels of proinflammatory cytokines and biomarkers of matrix remodeling in never-treated patients with familial hypercholesterolemia. Clin Chim Acta. 2006;366:185–9. [PubMed] 25. Miatello R, et al. Chronic administration of resveratrol prevents biochemical cardiovascular changes in fructose-fed rats. Am J Hypertens. 2005;18:864–70. [PubMed] 26. Huang BW, Chiang MT, Yao HT, Chiang W. The effect of high-fat and high-fructose diets on glucose tolerance and plasma lipid and leptin levels in rats. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2004;6:120–6. [PubMed] 27. Hishikawa K, Lüscher TF. Felodipine inhibits free-radical production by cytokines and glucose in human smooth muscle cells. Hypertension. 1998;32:1011–5. [PubMed] 28. Rödler S, Roth M, Nauck M, Tamm M, Block LH. Ca(2+)-channel blockers modulate the expression of interleukin-6 and interleukin-8 genes in human vascular smooth muscle cells. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1995;27:2295–302. [PubMed] 29. Bunag RD. Validation in awake rats of a tail-cuff method for measuring systolic pressure. J Appl Physiol. 1973;34:279–82. [PubMed] 30. Bunag RD. Blood pressure measurement in rats. In: Garten D, De Jong W, editors. Experimental and genetic models of hypertension. Handbook of hypertension. Vol. 16. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1994. pp. 1–17. 31. Matthews DR, et al. Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia. 1985;28:412–9. [PubMed] 32. Masson P. Trichrome stainings and their preliminary technique. J Tech Methods. 1992;2:75–90. 33. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2 (-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001;25:402–8. [PubMed] 34. Basciano H, Federico L, Adeli K. Fructose, insulin resistance, and metabolic dyslipidemia. Nutr Metab. 2005;2:5. 35. Frohlich M, et al. Association between C-reactive protein and features of the metabolic syndrome: a population-based study. Diabetes Care. 2000;23:1835–9. [PubMed] 36. Festa A, et al. Chronic subclinical inflammation as part of the insulin resistance syndrome: the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study (IRAS). Circulation. 2000;102:42–7. [PubMed] 37. Sakkinen PA, Wahl P, Cushman M, Lewis MR, Tracy RP. Clustering of procoagulation, inflammation, and fibrinolysis variables with metabolic factors in insulin resistance syndrome. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;152:897–907. [PubMed] 38. Hak AE, et al. Markers of inflammation and cellular adhesion molecules in relation to insulin resistance in nondiabetic elderly: the Rotterdam study. J Clin Endocrinol Metabol. 2001;86:4398–405. 39. Hung J, McQuillan BM, Chapman CM, Thompson PL, Beilby JP. Elevated interleukin-18 levels are associated with the metabolic syndrome independent of obesity and insulin resistance. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005;25:1268–73. [PubMed] 40. Zirlik A, et al. Interleukin-18, the metabolic syndrome, and subclinical atherosclerosis: results from the Dallas Heart Study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2007;27:2043–9. [PubMed] 41. Greenberg AS, McDaniel ML. Identifying the links between obesity, insulin resistance and beta-cell function: potential role of adipocyte adipocyte-derived cytokines in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes. Eur J Clin Invest. 2002;32:24–34. [PubMed] 42. McLaughlin T, et al. Differentiation between obesity and insulin resistance in the association with C-reactive protein. Circulation. 2002;106:2908–12. [PubMed] 43. Reddy VS, et al. Interleukin-18 stimulates fibronectin expression in primary human cardiac fibroblasts via PI3K-Akt-dependent NF-kappaB activation. J Cell Physiol. 2008;215:697–707. [PubMed] 44. Gerdes N, et al. Expression of interleukin (IL)-18 and functional IL-18 receptor on human vascular endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells, and macrophages: implications for atherogenesis. J Exp Med. 2002;195:245–57. [PubMed] 45. Abaci A, et al. Effect of diabetes mellitus on formation of coronary collateral vessels. Circulation. 1999;99:2239–42. [PubMed] 46. Schaper W, Buschmann I. Collateral circulation and diabetes. Circulation. 1999;99:2224–6. [PubMed] 47. Zaman AK, et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition attenuates hypofibrinolysis and reduces cardiac perivascular fibrosis in genetically obese diabetic mice. Circulation. 2001;103:3123–8. [PubMed] 48. Matsumori A, Nunokawa Y, Sasayama S. Nifedipine inhibits activation of transcription factor NF-kappaB. Life Sci. 2000;67:2655–61. [PubMed] 49. Iwasaki Y, et al. Nilvadipine inhibits nuclear factor-kappaB-dependent transcription in hepatic cells. Clin Chim Acta. 2004;350:151–7. [PubMed] 50. Matsubara M, Hasegawa K. Effects of benidipine, a dihydropyridine-Ca2+ channel blocker, on expression of cytokine-induced adhesion molecules and chemoattractants in human aortic endothelial cells. Eur J Pharmacol. 2004;498:303–14. [PubMed] 51. Ding Y, Vaziri ND. Calcium channel blockade enhances nitric oxide synthase expression by cultured endothelial cells. Hypertension. 1998;32:718–23. [PubMed] 52. Jesmin S, et al. Subdepressor dose of benidipine ameliorates diabetic cardiac remodeling accompanied by normalization of upregulated endothelin system in rats. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2006;290:2146–54. |
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||
Diabetes Care. 2003 Apr; 26(4):1251-7.
[Diabetes Care. 2003]Circulation. 2004 Aug 17; 110(7):803-9.
[Circulation. 2004]Diabetes. 1988 Dec; 37(12):1595-607.
[Diabetes. 1988]Am J Epidemiol. 2000 Nov 15; 152(10):897-907.
[Am J Epidemiol. 2000]J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2004 Aug; 37(2):525-35.
[J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2004]Diabetologia. 1997 Nov; 40(11):1286-92.
[Diabetologia. 1997]J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Apr 2; 41(7):1071-7.
[J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003]Adv Immunol. 1998; 70():281-312.
[Adv Immunol. 1998]J Leukoc Biol. 2003 Feb; 73(2):213-24.
[J Leukoc Biol. 2003]Circulation. 2001 Oct 2; 104(14):1598-603.
[Circulation. 2001]J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002 Aug; 87(8):3864-6.
[J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002]J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004 Feb; 89(2):806-11.
[J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004]Circulation. 2002 Oct 15; 106(16):2067-72.
[Circulation. 2002]Diabetes Care. 2003 May; 26(5):1647.
[Diabetes Care. 2003]Diabetes Care. 2003 Sep; 26(9):2622-7.
[Diabetes Care. 2003]Am J Hypertens. 2005 Jun; 18(6):864-70.
[Am J Hypertens. 2005]Diabetes Obes Metab. 2004 Mar; 6(2):120-6.
[Diabetes Obes Metab. 2004]Hypertension. 1998 Dec; 32(6):1011-5.
[Hypertension. 1998]J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1995 Oct; 27(10):2295-302.
[J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1995]J Appl Physiol. 1973 Feb; 34(2):279-82.
[J Appl Physiol. 1973]Diabetologia. 1985 Jul; 28(7):412-9.
[Diabetologia. 1985]Methods. 2001 Dec; 25(4):402-8.
[Methods. 2001]Diabetologia. 1997 Nov; 40(11):1286-92.
[Diabetologia. 1997]J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Apr 2; 41(7):1071-7.
[J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003]Diabetes Care. 2000 Dec; 23(12):1835-9.
[Diabetes Care. 2000]Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005 Jun; 25(6):1268-73.
[Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005]Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2007 Sep; 27(9):2043-9.
[Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2007]Eur J Clin Invest. 2002 Jun; 32 Suppl 3():24-34.
[Eur J Clin Invest. 2002]Circulation. 2002 Dec 3; 106(23):2908-12.
[Circulation. 2002]J Cell Physiol. 2008 Jun; 215(3):697-707.
[J Cell Physiol. 2008]J Exp Med. 2002 Jan 21; 195(2):245-57.
[J Exp Med. 2002]Circulation. 1999 May 4; 99(17):2239-42.
[Circulation. 1999]Circulation. 1999 May 4; 99(17):2224-6.
[Circulation. 1999]Circulation. 2001 Jun 26; 103(25):3123-8.
[Circulation. 2001]Life Sci. 2000 Oct 13; 67(21):2655-61.
[Life Sci. 2000]Clin Chim Acta. 2004 Dec; 350(1-2):151-7.
[Clin Chim Acta. 2004]Eur J Pharmacol. 2004 Sep 13; 498(1-3):303-14.
[Eur J Pharmacol. 2004]Hypertension. 1998 Oct; 32(4):718-23.
[Hypertension. 1998]