• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of ijpgJournal's HomeManuscript SubmissionAims and ScopeAuthor GuidelinesEditorial BoardHome
Int J Plant Genomics. 2008; 2008: 362451.
Published online Apr 23, 2008. doi:  10.1155/2008/362451
PMCID: PMC2375965

Genomics of Sorghum

Abstract

Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) is a subject of plant genomics research based on its importance as one of the world's leading cereal crops, a biofuels crop of high and growing importance, a progenitor of one of the world's most noxious weeds, and a botanical model for many tropical grasses with complex genomes. A rich history of genome analysis, culminating in the recent complete sequencing of the genome of a leading inbred, provides a foundation for invigorating progress toward relating sorghum genes to their functions. Further characterization of the genomes other than Saccharinae cereals may shed light on mechanisms, levels, and patterns of evolution of genome size and structure, laying the foundation for further study of sugarcane and other economically important members of the group.

1. WHY SORGHUM?

As a food and feed crop, sorghum is an important “failsafe” in the global agroecosystem. Worldwide, sorghum is the 5th most important grain crop grown based on tonnage, after maize, wheat, rice, and barley (www.fao.org). Sorghumis unusually tolerant of low input levels, an essential trait for areas such as Northeast Africa and the US Southern Plains that receive too little rainfall for most other grains. Increased demand for limited fresh water supplies, increasing use of marginal farmland, and global climatic trends, all suggest that dryland crops such as sorghum will be of growing importance to feed the world’s expanding populations.

Currently the 2nd source of grain-based ethanol in the US (after maize), sorghum is a biofuel crop of growing importance. The generally lower water demands and market price for sorghum than maize, versus their equal per-bushel ethanol yields, suggests that sorghum will be of growing importance in meeting grain-based biofuels needs. Cellulosic biofuel production offers compelling advantages over seed-based production [1], but will require greater utilization of marginal lands to make the low per-unit value of biomass production economical, and will be heavily dependent upon the use of perennials to be sustainable [2, 3]. A relatively advanced state of knowledge of the genetic control of perenniality in sorghum [4, 5] and early progress in functional genomics of perenniality [6] add to its promise as a cellulosic biofuels crop. “Sweet sorghums” with high sugar content in stems, already grown for forage and silage, may be especially promising.

The Sorghum genus also offers the opportunity to gain new insights into biology of weeds and invasives. Vegetative dispersal by rhizomes (underground stems) and seed dispersal by disarticulation of the mature inflorescence (shattering) cause “Johnsongrass” [Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers, 2n = 2x = 40] to rank among the world's most noxious weeds [7]. Johnsongrass is an interspecific hybrid of Sorghum bicolor and S. propinquum, the latter contributing rhizomatousness. Sorghum bicolor and S. propinquum are readily crossed, and their progeny provide a system in which to dissect the genetic basis of rhizomatousness [4]. The same features that make Johnsongrass such a troublesome weed are actually desirable in many forage, turf, and biomass crops which are genetically complex. Therefore, sorghum offers novel learning opportunities relevant to weed biology as well as to improvement of a wide range of other forage, turf, and biomass crops.

The small genome of sorghum has long been an attractive model for advancing understanding of the structure, function, and evolution of cereal genomes. Sorghum is representative of tropical grasses in that it has “C4” photosynthesis, using complex biochemical and morphological specializations to improve carbon assimilation at high temperatures. By contrast, rice is more representative of temperate grasses, using “C3” photosynthesis. Its lower level of gene duplication than many other tropical cereals makes sorghum, like rice, an attractive model for functional genomics. However, sorghum is much more closely related than rice to many major cereal crops with complex genomes and high levels of gene duplication. Sorghum and Zea (maize, the leading US crop with a farm-gate value of $15–20 billion/y) diverged from a common ancestor ~12 mya [8, 9] versus ~42 mya for rice and the maize/sorghum lineage [10]. Saccharum (sugarcane), arguably the most important biofuels crop worldwide, valued at ~$30 billion including $1 billion/y in the US*, may have shared ancestry with sorghum as little as 5 million years ago [11], retains similar gene order [12], and even produces viable progeny in some intergeneric crosses [13]. Zea has undergone one whole-genome duplication since its divergence from Sorghum [14], and Saccharum has undergone at least two [12].

2. PROGRESS IN SORGHUM GENOME CHARACTERIZATION

2.1. Genetic mapping

Linkage mapping in sorghum takes advantage of its straightforward diploid genetics, amenability to inbreeding, high levels of DNA polymorphism between Sorghum species, and manageable levels of DNA polymorphism within S. bicolor. High-density reference maps of one intraspecific S. bicolor [1518] and one interspecific S. bicolor x S. propinquum [19, 20] cross provide about 2600 sequence-tagged-sites (based on low-copy probes that have been sequenced), 2454 AFLP, and ~1375 sequence-scanned (based on sequences of genetically anchored BAC clones) loci. These two maps share one common parent (S. bicolor “BTx623”) and are essentially colinear [21]. Cytological characterization of the individual sorghum chromosomes has provided a generally adopted numbering system [22].

More than 800 markers mapped in sorghum are derived from other taxa (hence serve as comparative anchors) and additional sorghum markers have been mapped directly in other taxa, or can be plotted based on sequence similarity. Anchoring of the sorghum maps to those of rice [10, 23], maize [20, 24], sugarcane [12, 25], millet [26], switchgrass [27], bermuda grass [28], and others provides for the cross-utilization of results to simultaneously advance knowledge of many important crops.

2.2. Physical mapping

Sorghum was the first angiosperm for which a BAC library was published [29]. Estimates of the physical size of the sorghum genome range from 700 Mbp based on Cot analysis [30] to 772 Mbp based on flow cytometry [31]. This makes the sorghum genome about 60% larger than that of rice, but only about 1/4 the size of the genomes of maize or human. DNA renaturation kinetic analysis [30] shows the sorghum genome to be comprised of about 16% foldback DNA, 15% highly repetitive DNA (with individual families occurring at an average of 5200 copies per genome), 41% middle-repetitive DNA (average 72 copies) and 24% low-copy DNA. About 4% of the DNA remained single-stranded at very high Cot values and is assumed to have been damaged (thus the other percentages are slight underestimates).

High-coverage BAC libraries are available for BTx623 (about 12X coverage from HindIII and 8X from BamHI), S. propinquum (13-14X coverage from EcoRI (~7X) and HindIII (~7X) and IS3620C (~9X coverage from HindIII). A total of 69 545 agarose-based fingerprints from BTx623 BACs are also anchored with 211,558 hybridization loci from 7292 probes (about 2000 of which are genetically mapped). In parallel, 40 957 agarose-based fingerprints from S. propinquum are anchored with 189 735 hybridization loci from 7481 probes (2000 genetically mapped). Targeted HICF of additional contig-terminal BACs has been used to fill gaps. Each of these has been assembled into WebFPC-accessible physical maps (http://www.stardaddy.uga.edu/fpc/WebAGCoL/bicolor/WebFPC and http://www.stardaddy.uga.edu/fpc/WebAGCoL/propinquum/WebFPC), for which earlier versions have been described in detail [32]. About 456 S. propinquum and 303 S. bicolor BAC contigs (41% of BACs, 80% of single-copy loci) appear to be well-anchored to euchromatic regions, with the percentage of the genome attributable to euchromatin likely to rise with additional anchoring. The finding that 41% of BACs are anchored to euchromatin while only 24% of the sorghum genomic DNA is single- or low-copy [with an overall kinetic complexity of 1.64×108 [30]], suggests that sorghum euchromatin includes a mixture of low-copy and repetitive DNA.

2.3. Genome sequence

The shotgun sequencing of a leading US sorghum inbred, BTx623, is now complete, with ~10.5 million reads (~8X coverage) deposited in the NCBI Trace Archive. Early analysis confirms that the sorghum genome sequence will be a suitable substrate for a complete and high-quality annotation. In a preliminary assembly (that is expected to further improve with ongoing analysis), more than 97% of sorghum protein-coding genes (ESTs) were captured in the ~250 longest scaffolds. The vast majority of these can be linked, ordered, and oriented using the genetic and physical map to reconstruct complete chromosomes. Alignments of the preliminary assembly to sorghum methyl-filtered sequence; sorghum, maize, and sugarcane transcript assemblies; and the Arabidopsis and rice proteomes confirms the base-level accuracy of the assembly and correct local structure of protein-coding loci.

Additional resources from reduced-representation sequencing will contribute to the identification of expressed portions of the genome sequence. The sorghum gene space is presently represented by approximately 204 000 expressed sequence tags, many of which have been clustered into ~22 000 unigenes representing more than 20 diverse libraries from several genotypes [33]. About 500 000 methyl-filtered (MF) reads that provide an estimated 1x coverage of the MF-estimated gene space [34] have been assembled into contigs (SAMIs, http://magi.plantgenomics.iastate.edu).

3. POSTGENOMICS OF SORGHUM

With the genome sequence available, one can anticipate renewed interest and accelerated progress in relating sorghum genes to their functions. Prior efforts will benefit from the sequence as a means of integrating diverse data types, providing for the formulation and testing of new hypotheses about roles of specific genes in particular traits. Existing data from QTL mapping, expression profiling, and early association genetics studies are likely to figure prominently in this merger. To fully realize the fruits of the sorghum sequence, additional functional genomics resources will be needed that provide for identification and study of crippling mutations in specific sorghum genes, in a manner that can be targeted to the subset of genes for which sorghum is a preferred system over rice, maize, or other cereal models.

3.1. QTL mapping

Motivated by interest in a range of basic and applied questions, the linkage maps of sorghum have been employed in the “tagging” (mapping) of genes for a large number of traits. The interspecific population has been especially useful for characterization of genes related to domestication, such as seed size, shattering [23], tillering, and rhizomatousness [4]. Plant height and flowering time [35, 36] have been a high priority. Similarly, the importance of hybrid sorghum motivated much research into the genetic control of fertility restoration [3739]. Resistance genes have been tagged for numerous diseases [4047], key insect pests [4851], and also the parasitic weed, striga [40, 52]. Genes and QTLs have been identified that are related to abiotic stresses including postreproductive stage drought tolerance (stay-green) [5356]; preharvest sprouting [57, 58], and aluminum tolerance [59]. Additional morphological characteristics have also been mapped in interspecific and/or intraspecific populations [21].

3.2. Expression profiling

Progress in characterization of the transcriptome has been paralleled by identification of differential gene expression in response to biotic and abiotic factors, including greenbug feeding [60], dehydration, high salinity and ABA [61], and methyl jasmonate, salicylic acid, and aminocyclopropane carboxylic acid treatments [62].

3.3. Association genetics

Much of the value of the sorghum sequence may be realized through better understanding of the levels and patterns of diversity in extant germ plasm, which can contribute both to functional analysis of specific sorghum genes and to deterministic improvement of sorghum for specific needs and environments. Sorghum is well suited to association mapping methods because of its medium-range patterns of linkage disequilibrium [63] and its self-pollinating mating system. Extensive ex situ sorghum germplasm collections exist within the U.S. National Plant Germplasm System and ICRISAT. Early characterization of complementary association genetics panels developed by a group of US scientists [6], and by Subprogram 1 of the Generation Challenge Program, is in progress. At present, more than 750 SSR alleles and 1402 SNP alleles discovered in 3.3 Mb of sequence [6366] are freely available from the Comparative Grass Genomics Center relational database [67]. Extensive studies of sequence variation in sorghum show that haplotype diversity is low, even when nucleotide diversity is high: for regions of average length 671 bp surveyed in 17 accessions, the median number of haplotypes was three and the mode was two [63]. Common sequence variation can therefore be captured in a small sample of accessions.

3.4. Need for mutants and their characterization

A collection of ~400 S. bicolor mutants, now under the curation of C. Franks (USDA-ARS, Lubbock TX), provides a start toward testing hypotheses about the functions of individual genes, but a much broader set is needed, ideally providing for the identification of multiple loss-of-function mutants in each gene. Sorghum offers an opportunity to complement more extensive reverse genetics resources in for Oryza and Zea, providing for the study of genes/gene families that are less tractable in maize or rice (e.g., which remain duplicated in both taxa, but are single copy in sorghum), and also for targeting functional analyses to specific sorghum genes implicated in key traits by association genetics or other approaches.

To accelerate identification in a targeted manner of mutants useful to relate Sorghum genes to their functions, 1600 M3 annotated individually pedigreed mutagenized lines using ethyl methane sulfonate have been generated for sorghum genotype BTx623 and their preliminary characterization is in progress [68]. To date, every M3 row inspected closely has been distinguishable from the original stock, and many have multiple mutant phenotypes (Z. Xin, personal communication). More effort in this area is desirable.

Transposon tagging warrants further exploration as a means to obtain additional mutants in sorghum. Cs1 is the first active transposable element isolated from sorghum, and offers several advantages as an insertion mutagen. Cs1-homologous sequences are present in low copy number in sorghum and other grasses, including sudangrass, maize, rice, teosinte, and sugarcane [69]. The low copy number and high transposition frequency of Cs1 implies that this transposon could prove to be an efficient gene isolation tool. Preliminary studies of Cs1 as a mutagen (S. Chopra, personal communication) indicate the feasibility of using this transposon as a tagging tool.

4. BEYOND SORGHUM-BROADER CHARACTERIZATION OF THE SACCHARINEAE

Sorghum sprung from the loins of the Saccharinae group of cereals, which also includes cultivated sugarcane and weedy/invasive Johnsongrass and Microstegium. This curious group shows a 6-fold variation in genome size among closely related species with the same chromosome number (S, bicolor and propinquum versus nitidum) [70]; an apparent reduction in chromosome number from the ancestral 20 to 10 in most parasorghums [71]; at least two chromosome doublings in Saccharum since its divergence from the remainder of the group [12]; and both natural (Sorghum halepense: [4]) and human-mediated polyploidization (Saccharum cultivars: [12]). Knowledge of the mechanisms, levels, and patterns of evolution of genome size and structure in this curious group will help to reveal the path by which the sorghum genome has arrived at its present state, also laying the foundation for further study of sugarcane and other economically important members of the group.

Of singular importance is the role that sorghum may play in clarifying the fates and consequences of genes duplicated in recent whole-genome duplications in Saccharum, and Zea (albeit not in the Saccharinae). Zea is the less complicated of these opportunities—a genomewide (or largely so) duplication in the Zea lineage shortly followed the Sorghum-Zea divergence [14, 72], making Sorghum an excellent outgroup for deducing the ancestral state at duplicated loci with regard to location, sequence, regulatory and other features. This opportunity is less complicated in that Zea is relatively advanced in restoration of the diploid state with regard to chromosome pairing, behaving for practical purposes as a diploid. Saccharum offers insight into an earlier stage following polyploid formation, behaving largely as an autopolyploid although with varying degrees of preferential pairing in different taxa and crosses [12, 73, 74]. Sorghum halepense, although far less well studied than either Zea or Saccharum, appears to be even closer to polyploid formation, in that its formation postdates the divergence of S. bicolor and S. propinquum which we roughly estimate to be 1-2 million years ago (based on ~1.2% divergence of coding nucleotides). While it is very possible that these three polyploidizations differed in the degree of pairing specificity that was possible at the outset of polyploid evolution, insight into the relative degrees of duplicate gene loss, and/or silencing would be a valuable resource toward clarifying recent hypotheses about adaptation of genomes to the polyploid state [75].

Acknowledgment

The author thanks the USDA-CSREES, NSF Plant Genome Research Program, and International Consortium for Sugarcane Biotechnology for funding relevant aspects of his research, and the US Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute Community Sequencing Program for sequencing of the sorghum genome.

References

1. Farrell AE, Plevin RJ, Turner BT, Jones AD, O'Hare M, Kammen DM. Ethanol can contribute to energy and environmental goals. Science. 2006;311(5760):506–508. [PubMed]
2. Wagoner P. Perennial grain development: past efforts and potential for the future. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences. 1990;9(5):381–408.
3. Scheinost PL, Lammer DL, Cai X, Murray TD, Jones SS. Perennial wheat: the development of a sustainable cropping system for the U.S. Pacific Northwest. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture. 2001;16(4):147–151.
4. Paterson AH, Schertz KF, Lin Y-R, Liu S-C, Chang Y-L. The weediness of wild plants: molecular analysis of genes influencing dispersal and persistence of johnsongrass, Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1995;92(13):6127–6131. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
5. Hu FY, Tao DY, Sacks E, et al. Convergent evolution of perenniality in rice and sorghum. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2003;100(7):4050–4054. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
6. Kresovich S, Barbazuk B, Bedell JA, et al. Toward sequencing the Sorghum genome. A U.S. National Science Foundation-sponsored workshop report. Plant Physiology. 2005;138(4):1898–1902. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Holm LG, Plucknett DL, Pancho JV, Herberger JP. The World's Worst Weeds: Distribution and Biology. Honolulu, Hawaii, USA: University Press of Hawaii; 1977.
8. Gaut BS, Clark LG, Wendel JF, Muse SV. Comparisons of the molecular evolutionary process at rbcL and ndhF in the grass family (Poaceae) Molecular Biology and Evolution. 1997;14(7):769–777. [PubMed]
9. Swigoňová Z, Lai J, Ma J, et al. Close split of sorghum and maize genome progenitors. Genome Research. 2004;14(10):1916–1923. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. Paterson AH, Bowers JE, Chapman BA. Ancient polyploidization predating divergence of the cereals, and its consequences for comparative genomics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2004;101(26):9903–9908. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Sobral BWS, Braga DPV, LaHood ES, Keim P. Phylogenetic analysis of chloroplast restriction enzyme site mutations in the Saccharinae griseb. subtribe of the Andropogoneae Dumort. tribe. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 1994;87(7):843–853. [PubMed]
12. Ming R, Liu S-C, Lin Y-R, et al. Detailed alignment of saccharum and sorghum chromosomes: comparative organization of closely related diploid and polyploid genomes. Genetics. 1998;150(4):1663–1682. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. de Wet JMJ, Gupta SC, Harlan JR, Grassl CO. Cytogenetics of introgression from Saccharum into Sorghum. Crop Science. 1976;16:568–572.
14. Swigoňová Z, Lai J, Ma J, et al. On the tetraploid origin of the maize genome. Comparative and Functional Genomics. 2004;5(3):281–284. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Xu G-W, Magill CW, Schertz KF, Hart GE. A RFLP linkage map of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 1994;89(2-3):139–145. [PubMed]
16. Bhattramakki D, Dong J, Chhabra AK, Hart GE. An integrated SSR and RFLP linkage map of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench. Genome. 2000;43(6):988–1002. [PubMed]
17. Klein PE, Klein RR, Cartinhour SW, et al. A high-throughput AFLP-based method for constructing integrated genetic and physical maps: progress toward a sorghum genome map. Genome Research. 2000;10(6):789–807. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Menz MA, Klein RR, Mullet JE, Obert JA, Unruh NC, Klein PE. A high-density genetic map of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench based on 2926 AFLP®, RFLP and SSR markers. Plant Molecular Biology. 2002;48(5-6):483–499. [PubMed]
19. Chittenden LM, Schertz KF, Lin Y-R, Wing RA, Paterson AH. A detailed RFLP map of Sorghum bicolor X S.propinquum, suitable for high-density mapping, suggests ancestral duplication of Sorghum chromosomes or chromosomal segments. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 1994;87(8):925–933. [PubMed]
20. Bowers JE, Abbey C, Anderson S, et al. A high-density genetic recombination map of sequence-tagged sites for Sorghum, as a framework for comparative structural and evolutionary genomics of tropical grains and grasses. Genetics. 2003;165(1):367–386. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Feltus FA, Hart GE, Schertz KF, et al. Genetic map alignment and QTL correspondence between inter- and intra-specific sorghum populations. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 2006;112(7):1295–1305. [PubMed]
22. Kim J-S, Klein PE, Klein RR, Price HJ, Mullet JE, Stelly DM. Chromosome identification and nomenclature of Sorghum bicolor. Genetics. 2005;169(2):1169–1173. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Paterson AH, Lin Y-R, Li Z, et al. Convergent domestication of cereal crops by independent mutations at corresponding genetic loci. Science. 1995;269(5231):1714–1718. [PubMed]
24. Whitkus R, Doebley J, Lee M. Comparative genetic mapping of sorghum and maize. Genetics. 1992;132:1119–1130. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Dufour P, Deu M, Grivet L, et al. Construction of a composite sorghum genome map and comparison with sugarcane, a related complex polyploid. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 1997;94(3-4):409–418.
26. Jessup RW, Burson BL, Burow G, et al. Segmental allotetraploidy and allelic interactions in buffelgrass (Pennisetum ciliare (L.) Link syn. Cenchrus ciliaris L.) as revealed by genome mapping. Genome. 2003;46(2):304–313. [PubMed]
27. Missaoui AM, Paterson AH, Bouton JH. Investigation of genomic organization in switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) using DNA markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 2005;110(8):1372–1383. [PubMed]
28. Bethel CM, Sciara EB, Estill JC, Bowers JE, Hanna W, Paterson AH. A framework linkage map of bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon x transvaalensis) based on single-dose restriction fragments. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 2006;112(4):727–737. [PubMed]
29. Woo S-S, Jiang J, Gill BS, Paterson AH, Wing RA. Construction and characterization of a bacterial artificial chromosome library of Sorghum bicolor. Nucleic Acids Research. 1994;22(23):4922–4931. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
30. Peterson DG, Schulze SR, Sciara EB, et al. Integration of cot analysis, DNA cloning, and high-throughput sequencing facilitates genome characterization and gene discovery. Genome Research. 2002;12(5):795–807. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
31. Arumuganathan K, Earle E. Estimation of nuclear DNA content of plants by flow cytometry. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter. 1991;9(3):208–218.
32. Bowers JE, Arias MA, Asher R, et al. Comparative physical mapping links conservation of microsynteny to chromosome structure and recombination in grasses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2005;102(37):13206–13211. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
33. Pratt LH, Liang C, Shah M, et al. Sorghum expressed sequence tags identify signature genes for drought, pathogenesis, and skotomorphogenesis from a milestone set of 16,801 unique transcripts. Plant Physiology. 2005;139(2):869–884. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
34. Bedell JA, Budiman MA, Nunberg A, et al. Sorghum genome sequencing by methylation filtration. PLoS Biology. 2005;3(1):e13. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
35. Lin Y-R, Schertz KF, Paterson AH. Comparative analysis of QTLs affecting plant height and maturity across the poaceae, in reference to an interspecific sorghum population. Genetics. 1995;141(1):391–411. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
36. Ulanch PE, Childs KL, Morgan PW, Mullet JE. Molecular markers linked to Ma(1) in sorghum. Plant Physiology. 1996;111:709.
37. Klein RR, Klein PE, Chhabra AK, et al. Molecular mapping of the rf1 gene for pollen fertility restoration in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 2001;102(8):1206–1212.
38. Wen L, Tang HV, Chen W, et al. Development and mapping of AFLP markers linked to the sorghum fertility restorer gene rf4. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 2002;104(4):577–585. [PubMed]
39. Klein RR, Klein PE, Mullet JE, Minx P, Rooney WL, Schertz KF. Fertility restorer locus Rf1 of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) encodes a pentatricopeptide repeat protein not present in the colinear region of rice chromosome 12. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 2005;111(6):994–1012. [PubMed]
40. Mutengwa CS, Tongoona PB, Sithole-Niang I. Genetic studies and a search for molecular markers that are linked to Striga asiatica resistance in sorghum. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2005;4(12):1355–1361.
41. McIntyre CL, Casu RE, Drenth J, et al. Resistance gene analogues in sugarcane and sorghum and their association with quantitative trait loci for rust resistance. Genome. 2005;48(3):391–400. [PubMed]
42. McIntyre CL, Hermann SM, Casu RE, et al. Homologues of the maize rust resistance gene Rp1-D are genetically associated with a major rust resistance QTL in sorghum. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 2004;109(4):875–883. [PubMed]
43. Multani DS, Meeley RB, Paterson AH, Gray J, Briggs SP, Johal GS. Plant-pathogen microevolution: molecular basis for the origin of a fungal disease in maize. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1998;95(4):1686–1691. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
44. Totad AS, Fakrudin B, Kuruvinashetti MS. Isolation and characterization of resistance gene analogs (RGAs) from sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) Euphytica. 2005;143(1-2):179–188.
45. Singh M, Chaudhary K, Singal HR, Magill CW, Boora KS. Identification and characterization of RAPD and SCAR markers linked to anthracnose resistance gene in sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] Euphytica. 2006;149(1-2):179–187.
46. Wang ML, Dean R, Erpelding J, Pederson G. Molecular genetic evaluation of sorghum germplasm differing in response to fungal diseases: rust (Puccinia purpurea) and anthracnose (Collectotrichum graminicola) Euphytica. 2006;148(3):319–330.
47. Tao YZ, Jordan DR, Henzell RG, McIntyre CL. Identification of genomic regions for rust resistance in sorghum. Euphytica. 1998;103(3):287–292.
48. Katsar CS, Paterson RH, Teetes GL, Peterson GC. Molecular analysis of sorghum resistance to the greenbug (Homoptera: Aphididae) Journal of Economic Entomology. 2002;95(2):448–457. [PubMed]
49. Agrama H, Widle G, Reese J, Campbell L, Tuinstra M. Genetic mapping of QTLs associated with greenbug resistance and tolerance in Sorghum bicolor. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 2002;104(8):1373–1378. [PubMed]
50. Nagaraj N, Reese JC, Tuinstra MR, et al. Molecular mapping of sorghum genes expressing tolerance to damage by greenbug (Homoptera: Aphididae) Journal of Economic Entomology. 2005;98(2):595–602. [PubMed]
51. Tao YZ, Hardy A, Drenth J, et al. Identifications of two different mechanisms for sorghum midge resistance through QTL mapping. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 2003;107(1):116–122. [PubMed]
52. Haussmann BIG, Hess DE, Omanya GO, et al. Genomic regions influencing resistance to the parasitic weed Striga hermonthica in two recombinant inbred populations of sorghum. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 2004;109(5):1005–1016. [PubMed]
53. Xu W, Subudhi PK, Crasta OR, Rosenow DT, Mullet JE, Nguyen HT. Molecular mapping of QTLs conferring stay-green in grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) Genome. 2000;43(3):461–469. [PubMed]
54. Subudhi PK, Rosenow DT, Nguyen HT. Quantitative trait loci for the stay green trait in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench): consistency across genetic backgrounds and environments. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 2000;101(5-6):733–741.
55. Crasta OR, Xu W, Rosenow DT, Mullet J, Nguyen HT. Mapping of post flowering drought resistance traits in grain sorghum: association between QTLs influencing premature senescence and maturity. Molecular and General Genetics. 1999;262(3):579–588. [PubMed]
56. Haussmann BIG, Mahalakshmi V, Reddy BVS, Seetharama N, Hash CT, Geiger HH. QTL mapping of stay-green in two sorghum recombinant inbred populations. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 2002;106(1):133–142. [PubMed]
57. Carrari F, Benech-Arnold R, Osuna-Fernandez R, et al. Genetic mapping of the Sorghum bicolor vp1 gene and its relationship with preharvest sprouting resistance. Genome. 2003;46(2):253–258. [PubMed]
58. Lijavetzky D, Martínez MC, Carrari F, Hopp HE. QTL analysis and mapping of pre-harvest sprouting resistance in sorghum. Euphytica. 2000;112(2):125–135.
59. Magalhaes JV, Garvin DF, Wang Y, et al. Comparative mapping of a major aluminum tolerance gene in sorghum and other species in the Poaceae. Genetics. 2004;167(4):1905–1914. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
60. Park S-J, Huang Y, Ayoubi P. Identification of expression profiles of sorghum genes in response to greenbug phloem-feeding using cDNA subtraction and microarray analysis. Planta. 2006;223(5):932–947. [PubMed]
61. Buchanan CD, Lim S, Salzman RA, et al. Sorghum bicolor's transcriptome response to dehydration, high salinity and ABA. Plant Molecular Biology. 2005;58(5):699–720. [PubMed]
62. Salzman RA, Brady JA, Finlayson SA, et al. Transcriptional profiling of sorghum induced by methyl jasmonate, salicylic acid, and aminocyclopropane carboxylic acid reveals cooperative regulation and novel gene responses. Plant Physiology. 2005;138(1):352–368. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
63. Hamblin MT, Salas Fernandez MG, Casa AM, Mitchell SE, Paterson AH, Kresovich S. Equilibrium processes cannot explain high levels of short- and medium-range linkage disequilibrium in the domesticated grass Sorghum bicolor. Genetics. 2005;171(3):1247–1256. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
64. Schloss SJ, Mitchell SE, White GM, et al. Characterization of RFLP probe sequences for gene discovery and SSR development in Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 2002;105(6-7):912–920. [PubMed]
65. Hamblin MT, Mitchell SE, White GM, et al. Comparative population genetics of the panicoid grasses: sequence polymorphism, linkage disequilibrium and selection in a diverse sample of Sorghum bicolor. Genetics. 2004;167(1):471–483. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
66. Casa AM, Mitchell SE, Hamblin MT, et al. Diversity and selection in sorghum: simultaneous analyses using simple sequence repeats. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 2005;111(1):23–30. [PubMed]
67. Gingle AR, Huang Y, Yang H, Bowers J, Kresovich S, Paterson AH. CGGC: an integrated web resource for sorghum. submitted to Plant Physiology.
68. Xin Z, Wang M, Barkley N, Jr, et al. Development of a tilling population for sorghum functional genomics. Proceedings of the 15th International Plant & Animal Genome Conference; January 2007; San Diego, Calif, USA.
69. Chopra S, Brendel V, Zhang J, Axtell JD, Peterson T. Molecular characterization of a mutable pigmentation phenotype and isolation of the first active transposable element from Sorghum bicolor. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1999;96(26):15330–15335. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
70. Price HJ, Dillon SL, Hodnett G, Rooney WL, Ross L, Johnston JS. Genome evolution in the genus Sorghum (Poaceae) Annals of Botany. 2005;95(1):219–227. [PubMed]
71. Spangler R, Zaitchik B, Russo E, Kellogg E. Andropogoneae evolution and generic limits in Sorghum (Poaceae) using ndhF sequences. Systematic Botany. 1999;24(2):267–281.
72. Swigoňová Z, Lai J, Ma J, Ramakrishna W, Llaca V, Bennetzen JL, Messing J. Close split of sorghum and maize genome progenitors. Genome Research. 2004;14(10):1916–1923. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
73. Al-Janabi SM, Honeycutt RJ, McClelland M, Sobral BWS. A genetic linkage map of Saccharum spontaneum L. ‘SES 208’ Genetics. 1993;134(4):1249–1260. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
74. Grivet L, D'Hont A, Roques D, Feldmann P, Lanaud C, Glaszmann JC. RFLP mapping in cultivated sugarcane (Saccharum spp.): genome organization in a highly polyploid and aneuploid interspecific hybrid. Genetics. 1996;142(3):987–1000. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
75. Paterson AH, Chapman BA, Kissinger JC, Bowers JE, Feltus FA, Estill JC. Convergent retention or loss of gene/domain families following independent whole-genome duplication events in Arabidopsis, Oryza, Saccharomyces, and Tetraodon. Trends in Genetics. 2006;22(11):597–602. [PubMed]

Articles from International Journal of Plant Genomics are provided here courtesy of Hindawi Publishing Corporation
PubReader format: click here to try

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...