• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of plosonePLoS OneView this ArticleSubmit to PLoSGet E-mail AlertsContact UsPublic Library of Science (PLoS)
PLoS ONE. 2008; 3(5): e2213.
Published online May 21, 2008. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0002213
PMCID: PMC2374903

Replicative Senescence of Mesenchymal Stem Cells: A Continuous and Organized Process

Thomas Zwaka, Editor

Abstract

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) comprise a promising tool for cellular therapy. These cells are usually culture expanded prior to their application. However, a precise molecular definition of MSC and the sequel of long-term in vitro culture are yet unknown. In this study, we have addressed the impact of replicative senescence on human MSC preparations. Within 43 to 77 days of cultivation (7 to 12 passages), MSC demonstrated morphological abnormalities, enlargement, attenuated expression of specific surface markers, and ultimately proliferation arrest. Adipogenic differentiation potential decreased whereas the propensity for osteogenic differentiation increased. mRNA expression profiling revealed a consistent pattern of alterations in the global gene expression signature of MSC at different passages. These changes are not restricted to later passages, but are continuously acquired with increasing passages. Genes involved in cell cycle, DNA replication and DNA repair are significantly down-regulated in late passages. Genes from chromosome 4q21 were over-represented among differentially regulated transcripts. Differential expression of 10 genes has been verified in independent donor samples as well as in MSC that were isolated under different culture conditions. Furthermore, miRNA expression profiling revealed an up-regulation of hsa-mir-371, hsa-mir-369-5P, hsa-mir-29c, hsa-mir-499 and hsa-let-7f upon in vitro propagation. Our studies indicate that replicative senescence of MSC preparations is a continuous process starting from the first passage onwards. This process includes far reaching alterations in phenotype, differentiation potential, global gene expression patterns, and miRNA profiles that need to be considered for therapeutic application of MSC preparations.

Introduction

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) represent a multipotent adult stem cell population that, given the appropriate culture conditions, is able to differentiate into different mesodermal cell lineages including osteocytes, chondrocytes, and adipocytes. Albeit controversial, there is evidence that MSC can also differentiate into myocytes and cardiomyocytes and even into cells of non-mesodermal origin including hepatocytes and neurons [1][4]. Reliable markers for the definition of the multipotent fraction have not yet been defined and hence these cells have alternatively been named mesenchymal stromal cells [5]. Due to the lack of reliable molecular markers, MSC are concurrently defined by: a) plastic adherent growth, b) immunophenotype and c) their in vitro differentiation potential [6], [7]. Nevertheless, human MSC raise high hopes in various therapeutic applications and their use is concurrently tested in various clinical trials [7].

MSC have a limited lifespan in vitro as any normal, somatic cell. After a certain number of cell divisions, MSC enter senescence, which is morphologically characterized by enlarged and irregular cell shapes and ultimately a stop of proliferation. This phenomenon was first described in the 1960s by Leonard Hayflick [8]. Since then, it is debated if the so-called “Hayflick limit” might reflect the aging process of the whole organism. If cellular senescence triggers aging, this would be of utmost importance for all adult stem cells. The tissues of any organism are continuously renewed by adult stem cells and impairment of their function would inevitably result in aging [9]. Recent studies have indicated that murine and human MSC exhibit reduced differentiation potential upon prolonged in vitro culture [10][13]. Furthermore, senescence of MSC might limit their therapeutic applications. Thus, analysis of in vitro senescence in MSC is crucial for basic research as well as for quality control in cellular therapy.

The molecular mechanisms that underlie senescence are still poorly understood. Two fundamental ways have been hypothesized how this process may be governed: replicative senescence might either be the result of a purposeful program driven by genes or rather be evoked by stochastic or random, accidental events [14]. Most likely, it is an interplay of both mechanisms that promotes aging at various levels. Progressive shortening of the telomeres or modified telomeric structure has been associated with replicative senescence although this mechanism is unlikely to be the only cause of this phenomenon [15], [16]. There is also evidence that senescence involves DNA damage, accumulation of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p16INK4a and oxidative stress [9], [17], [18]. Clearly, cellular senescence is a complex process and the sequence of its molecular events is thus far unknown. Additionally, it is not known how senescence influences the overall expression of coding genes and micro RNAs in MSC.

With this in mind, we devised a study to analyze how morphology, immunophenotype and differentiation capacity of MSC is affected by in vitro expansion. In parallel, we analyzed how mRNA and miRNA expression profiles change upon culturing and in vitro propagation. We intended to gain insight into the molecular effects of replicative senescence even at early passages that would have impact for the quality control of MSC preparations used for therapeutic application.

Results

Long-term growth kinetics and morphology of MSC

Plastic-adherent fibroblast-like colonies were observed in all donor samples within the first days of cultivation. Proliferation gradually decreased in all samples in the course of long-term cultivation until the cells finally stopped to proliferate. Under culture conditions with low serum content and supplemented growth factors (MSCM1) cells proliferated relatively fast for 43 to 77 days, whereas MSC cultured in the commercial cambrex medium with 10% serum (MSCM2) resulted in prolongated growth for 74 to 104 days. Long-term growth curves differed considerably between the eight donor samples and the proliferation rate varied over the time course although the cells were always passaged at the same density of about 70% confluence (figure 1). The cumulative number of population doublings varied between 6 and 16 plus an estimated 7 to 9 population doublings during the initial colony formation. Overall, this would result in a maximal cell number of 3.6×108 to 7.1×1011 for MSCM1 and 1.1×108 to 1.7×108 for MSCM2. Replicative senescence led to previously observed typical morphological changes (figure 2A, B): cells became much larger with irregular and flat shape, and nuclei became more circumscribed in phase contrast microscopy. The cytoplasm began to be granular with many inclusions and aggradations appearing to be cell debris increased. Morphologic changes were not restricted to senescent stages but represented continuous alterations in the course of long-term culture of MSC.

Figure 1
Long-term growth curves.
Figure 2
Morphologic changes and immunophenotype upon senescence.

Immunophenotype

Immunophenotypic analysis represents one of the major parameters for the characterization of MSC preparations. Here, we analyzed the impact of senescence on the immunophenotype of MSCM1 preparations by flow cytometry. The median forward scatter signal increased during in vitro cultivation and this may be attributed to the continuously increasing cell size and granularity (figure 2C). A panel of 11 surface markers was tested (figure 2D). All MSC preparations were negative for the hematopoietic markers CD34 and CD45 and positive for CD13, CD29, CD44, CD73, CD90, CD105, CD146, and CD166 as expected [5], [19], [20]. Using this panel of markers, flow cytometry was not able to discern any distinct characteristics with regard to the heterogeneous composition of MSC subpopulations. Surprisingly, the level of surface antigen detection was much higher in early passages when compared to senescent passages. At the same time autofluorescence of MSC increased and this may be due to accumulation of highly fluorescent lipofuscin at later passages. These results indicate that the composition and expression level of surface markers varies upon long-term expansion.

In vitro differentiation

Another key parameter for defining MSC is their potential to differentiate along the adipogenic, osteogenic and chondrogenic lineages [1], [21][23]. Here, we have analyzed how the in vitro differentiation potential is affected by replicative senescence in MSCM1 (figure 3). The potential for adipogenic differentiation was confirmed following standard protocols, and lipid vesicles were stained by Oil red O. Fat formation was much more effective in early MSC passages indicating that adipogenic differentiation potential decreases in the course of in vitro senescence. In contrast, the propensity for osteogenic differentiation increased in later passages as demonstrated upon staining with either von Kossa or Alizarin red dye. Chondrogenic differentiation could also be induced in our MSC. However, despite the same initial cell number the pellets from early passages were larger and denser than those from later passages and this prevented a reliable semi-quantitative comparison of glycosaminoglycan expression. These results support the notion that long-term culture has an incremental impact on differentiation potential of MSC.

Figure 3
In vitro differentiation.

Molecular markers for senescence

Given the functional implications of in vitro senescence on MSC, we were interested in the analysis of senescence biomarkers. Because the enzyme lysosomal pH6 β-galactosidase (SA-β-gal) has been shown to be active in senescent human fibroblasts, but not in quiescent, pre-senescent or differentiated cells [24], we have employed SA-β-gal as senescence marker. In the last passages of MSCM1 the percentage of SA-β-gal positive cells as well as the intensity of the staining increased (figure 3). However, a more specific molecular marker would be necessary to grade the level of senescence of MSC preparations.

Differential gene expression upon replicative senescence

To determine mRNA expression changes indicative for in vitro senescence of MSCM1, we analyzed mRNA expression patterns of corresponding early passages (P2) and senescent passages (PX) of the same donor. We identified global changes in mRNA expression profiles that were commonly observed in three different donors (figure 4). The most significant differentially expressed genes are summarized in table 1 (SAM analysis, FDR<3).

Figure 4
mRNA expression profile of MSC changes extensively with higher passage.
Table 1
Differentially expressed mRNA upon in vitro senescence.

Up-regulated genes included: human glycoprotein NMB (GPNMB) that has high homology to osteoactivin, a glycoprotein that plays a role in osteoblast differentiation and function [25]; regeneration-associated muscle protease homolog (RAMP) that might play a role in regeneration of skeletal muscle; p53 apoptosis effector related to PMP-22 (PERP) that plays a role in stratified epithelial integrity and cell–cell adhesion by promoting desmosome assembly and acts as an effector for the p53-dependent apoptotic pathway [26]; Lymphocyte antigen 96 (LY96) that enhances TLR4-dependent activation of NF-kappa-B; Signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1) involved in the regulation of Interferon γ-activated sequences; and the prion protein (PRNP), which has been implicated in various types of transmissible neurodegenerative spongiform encephalopathies that such as Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease which usually manifest at higher ages [27]. Furthermore, the senescence associated markers cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (p16; Affymetrix ID: 207039_at; log2ratio = 2.12±0.95) and plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI; Affymetrix ID: 202627_s_at; log2ratio = 2.14±1.74) were up-regulated but they did not reach the level of significance. Genes that were down-regulated during replicative senescence included: hyaluronic acid synthetase 1 (HAS1) that mediates expression of the corresponding unbranched polysaccharide which represents an important constituent of the extra cellular matrix; inhibitor of DNA binding 1 (ID1; Affymetrix ID: 208937_s_at; log2ratio = −3.58±0.92) that is higher expressed in MSC preparations in comparison to non-multipotent fibroblasts [20]; and osteoprotegerin ligand (TNFSF11) that has been suggested as an osteoclast differentiation and activation factor [28].

Differential expression of 10 selected genes was verified by quantitative RT-PCR and the results were always in accordance with the microarray data in either the same three MSC preparations or in three additional independent donor samples. Furthermore, differential gene expression was also verified for nine of these genes in three MSC preparations that were isolated under different culture conditions (MSCM2). Thus, the identified changes in the global gene expression profile are highly consistent in different MSC preparations.

Our analysis revealed 1033 transcripts with a more than 2-fold up-regulation in senescent cells whereas 545 transcripts were more than 2-fold down-regulated. GeneOntology (GO) analysis demonstrated that up-regulated genes in senescent cells were highly overrepresented (P<0.0001) in the categories integral to membrane (GO:16021), plasma membrane (GO: 5886), receptor activity (GO:4872), cell adhesion (GO:7155), vacuole (GO:5773) and lysosome (GO:5764) (figure 4B). These findings are in line with the observed enlargement of the membrane compartment and vacuole formation in higher passages. Less abundant genes in senescent passages were associated with cell cycle (GO:7049), DNA metabolism (GO:6259), regulation of cell cycle (GO:51726), cytoskeletal part (GO:44430), DNA repair (GO:6281), chromosome (GO:5694), microtubule cytoskeleton (GO:15630), M-phase (GO:279) and DNA-replication (GO:6260) (figure 4C). These categories are perfectly in line with the reduced proliferation potential, accumulation of DNA defects and changes in cellular cytoskeleton as reflected by the senescence phenotype that was observed morphologically.

All data were probed for evidence of physical clustering among the senescence associated genes. Genes that were 2-fold up-regulated in senescent cells were significantly over-represented on chromosome bands 4q21, 11p13, 2q33, 5q14 and 8p22; whereas genes that were 2-fold down-regulated were over-represented on 4q21, 10q21.1, 5q12, 10q23.33, 1p31.2, 3q25.32 and 8q23 (P<0.01). Interestingly, the most significant over-representation (P<0.0005) for up- and down-regulated genes are co-localized at the same hot-spot on chromosome 4q21 (figure 4D, E).

The question remained, if these changes in mRNA expression are restricted to senescent passages, or if they represent incremental modifications in the course of cellular aging. Thus, we analyzed different cell passages of the same MSC preparation by microarray analysis. We observed continuous changes in global gene expression patterns as reflected by unsupervised hierarchical cluster analysis. Variation in the gene expression profile was already observed in very early passages, when morphological differences were not obvious. This could also be confirmed by QRT-PCR in samples from additional donors (figure 5). Thus, many changes in gene expression patterns of MSC preparations are not restricted to senescent passages, but are increasingly acquired upon in vitro expansion.

Figure 5
QRT-PCR validation of mRNA expression.

Differential microRNA expression upon replicative senescence

Senescence might be associated with the differential expression of miRNAs. We have compared miRNA profiles of early versus senescent MSCM1 passages using a microarray platform based on locked nucleic acids (miCHIP) [29]. Data analysis, normalization and statistical methods were performed described for the mRNA expression analysis. SAM analysis identified a group of five significantly up-regulated miRNAs, (FDR<1): hsa-mir-371, hsa-mir-369-5P, hsa-mir-29c, hsa-mir-499 and hsa-mir-217 (signal intensity of hsa-mir-217 was very low and thus not considered for subsequent analysis). In addition, miRNA expression was analyzed in the different passages of donor 1 and hierarchical cluster analysis indicated that expression of these miRNAs increases in the course of replicative senescence. Differential expression of three miRNAs (hsa-mir-369-5P, hsa-mir-29c and let-7f) was validated by using quantitative RT-PCR in all three donor samples as well as in three independent donor samples (figure 6). QRT-PCR results were in line with miCHIP analysis indicating that the expression of these miRNAs is up-regulated in the course of replicative senescence of MSC.

Figure 6
miRNA expression changes upon in vitro senescence.

Discussion

MSC have paved their way towards therapeutic application although there is little knowledge about specific molecular markers for this population and the impact of culture expansion methods. In this study, we demonstrate that replicative senescence of MSC has functional implications on surface marker expression and differentiation potential and that it evokes consistent changes in the global gene expression and miRNA expression profiles of MSCs from different donors. These senescence-associated effects were not restricted to senescent passages, but are continuously acquired from the onset of in vitro culture.

Many studies have reported that MSC undergo the typical Hayflick phenomenon of cellular senescence with decreasing proliferation and changes in cell morphology. We have found that senescence occurred after a cumulative number of population doublings ranging from 6 to 16 population doublings. In addition, an estimated 7 to 9 population doublings took place during the initial colony formation. Thus, the total number of population doublings would be between 13 and 25 and this is compatible with expansion rates of 104-fold to 108-fold. This is in line with observations of other groups [10], [30]. The pace of senescence might be affected by the culture conditions. Colter et al. reported that single cell derived MSC clones could be expanded up to 50 population doublings in about 10 weeks if cultured by repeated passage at low density whereas cells stopped growing after 15 passages if passed at high cell density [31]. Other authors suggested that lower oxygen concentrations could enhance the maximal number of population doublings [32]. MSC isolated from different tissues have different functional properties including different long-term growth kinetics [30], [33]. Furthermore, there is evidence for a negative correlation between donor age and the proliferative capacity of MSC although this is still under debate [10], [34][36]. Data of this study might demonstrate a tendency for higher cumulative population doublings in MSC form younger donors but more probes would be necessary to verify this effect.

In this study, we demonstrated that in vitro expansion has a major impact on a) the morphology of plastic adherent growth, b) the level of surface marker expression and c) adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation potential and thus on all parameters that are concurrently used for the definition of MSC [6]. Other authors did not find differences in surface marker expression of senescent MSC [10], [36]. This might be due to the fact that in these studies, the level of surface marker expression was not determined simultaneously. Furthermore, our results indicate that adipogenic differentiation potential decreases upon replicative senescence whereas the propensity for osteogenic differentiation increased in higher passages. These observations are based on either fat droplet formation or calcium phosphate deposition and they would be further strengthened by analysis of adipocyte or osteocyte specific gene expression. Our results are in line with similar studies from other groups that demonstrate functional implications on differentiation potential [10], [11], [34], [37]. Thus, in vitro expansion attenuates the parameters that are commonly used to define MSC.

To gain insight into the molecular characteristics of replicative senescence, we analyzed changes in mRNA expression profiles of MSC. So far, comparison of expression patterns in early and late passages has only been investigated in other cell types [38], [39]. Differential expression of 10 selected genes was highly consistent in six donor samples as well as in MSC that were isolated under different culture conditions. We have previously demonstrated that variation between these culture conditions has a tremendous impact on gene expression and protein expression profiles [20], [40]. The consistence of senescence associated differential gene expression in different donor samples and under different culture conditions indicates that senescence of MSC preparations follows a common molecular program.

Ontogenetically, it was striking to see, that genes involved in cell cycle, DNA replication and mitosis were significantly less expressed in senescent cells. This further strengthens the hypothesis that senescence follows a fixed program where genes involved in the proliferation machinery are down-regulated. The causal factors that might mediate this process are yet unknown but they might include successive changes in the epigenetic state [13]. On the other hand, these findings do not rule out the possibility that the accumulation of cellular defects (e.g. oxidative stress, telomere loss or DNA damage) activates a specific program for senescence.

Surprisingly, the most significant over-representation of up-regulated and down-regulated genes was at the same locus on chromosome 4q21. Other authors have previously indicated that cell senescence-related genes are localized on human chromosome 4 as introduction of normal human chromosome 4 into three immortal cell lines resulted in loss of proliferation and reversal of the immortal phenotype [41]. The candidate interval has been further specified to a region between 4q22-q23 by analysis of microsatellite markers on the introduced chromosome [42]. Furthermore, a locus on chromosome 4 has been identified by genome-wide scans for linkage of human exceptional longevity and these linkage results indicate the existence of one or more genes that exert a substantial influence on the ability to achieve exceptionally old age [43], [44]. Thus, our differential gene expression analysis provides further evidence that this chromosomal region plays a central role in senescence and aging.

We have demonstrated for the first time that changes of senescence-associated gene expression are not restricted to senescent passages, but increase continuously during in vitro expansion. This is in line with the continuous changes in morphology and loss of differentiation potential. These changes might either be based on the subsequent accumulation of growth arrested senescent cells or on the continuous up-regulation of a program involved in senescence. Either way, our results indicate also on a molecular basis, that replicative senescence is a continuous process starting at time of initiation of in vitro cultures.

We have analyzed the role of miRNA expression in the molecular determination of cellular senescence. miRNAs constitute a group of endogenous small, non coding RNAs of approximately 22 nucleotides in length that exert a post-transcriptional effect on gene expression [45], [46]. These mature miRNA molecules, cleaved from 70–100 nucleotide hairpin pre-miRNA precursors [47], are expressed in a tissue- and cell-type specific manner and play essential roles in development. For the nematode worm Caenorhabditis elegans it was demonstrated that over-expression of lin-4 led to extended life span, and an overall age-related decline in miRNA expression was observed [48], [49]. Other authors reported unchanged miRNA expression patterns in the aging lung of mice [50]. Currently, 556 different human miRNAs are listed in the miRBase registry (miRBase v10, http://microrna.sanger.ac.uk/) and 322 of these are represented on our miCHIP (miRBase v8.0) [29]. We have demonstrated for the first time that miRNAs (hsa-mir-371, hsa-mir-369-5P, hsa-mir-29c, hsa-mir-499 and hsa-let-7f) are up-regulated upon replicative senescence. For target analysis we compared the results from the three miRNA target databases miRBase (http://microrna.sanger.ac.uk/), mirTar (http://mirtar.mbc.nctu.edu.tw/index.html) and Tarbase (http://www.diana.pcbi.upenn.edu/cgi-bin/search.cgi). Despite the fact that each of these miRNAs has a multitude of predicted targets hardly any of these are so far validated. Interestingly it was shown that hsa-mir-29c directly targets DNA-methyl transferase 3A (DNMT3A) and 3B (DNMT3B) in lung cancer tissue [51]. In addition hsa-mir-371 is predicted to target DNMT3A (miRTar), while DNA-methyl transferase 2 (DNMT2) belongs to the predicted targets of hsa-miR-499 (miRTar). Hence, it might be speculated that senescence associated up-regulation of these miRNAs results in changes in the methylation pattern. These epigenetic modifications have been postulated to play a role in senescence [13], [52].

Replicative senescence does not necessarily represent an inevitable fate for all cells, because cellular senescence is not observed in primitive organisms such as sponges or corrals as well as in our germline cells. Somatic cells that have divided many times will have accumulated DNA mutations and would therefore be in danger of becoming cancerous if cell division continued. This implies that in somatic cells replicative senescence might be a purposeful program to protect the organisms rather than a cell culture artifact. Our results indicate that replicative senescence is associated with very reproducible changes in gene expression of MSC from different donors as well as under different culture conditions. Genes involved in DNA replication and repair are successively down-regulated. The final existence of a senescence associated program remains to be proven and specific factors that would activate or regulate such a program are yet unknown. However, the parallel nature of the molecular changes described in this study further indicates that senescence represents a somehow organized process. It is also striking, that these changes increase successively with every passage in a continuous fashion and that they are not restricted to the end of long-term in vitro culture. The characteristics of MSC change almost undetectably from the beginning of in vitro culture. Thus, future quality standards will have to include the senescence state of MSC preparations. Gene expression profiling and miRNA analysis as presented in this study pave the way for molecular characterization of cell preparations including their state of senescence.

Materials and Methods

Isolation of MSC

Human bone marrow (BM) samples were taken after written consent using guidelines approved by the Ethic Committee on the Use of Human Subjects at the University of Heidelberg. In this study, we have used specimen from 8 healthy donors. The mononuclear cell (MNC) fraction was isolated by Biocoll density gradient centrifugation (d = 1.077 g/cm3; Biochrom, Berlin, Germany). MNC were plated at a density of 105 cells/cm2 in tissue culture flasks (Nunc, Wiesbaden, Germany) under two standardized culture conditions as described in our previous work (MSCM1 and MSCM2) [20], [40].

Culture medium M1 has been described by M. Reyes and colleagues [1]: It consists of 58% Dulbecco's Modified Eagles Medium-Low Glucose (DMEM-LG, Cambrex, Apen, Germany) and 40% MCDB201 (Sigma, Deisenhofen, Germany), 2% FCS (HyClone, Bonn, Germany), supplemented with 2 mM L-Glutamine, 100 U/ml Pen/Strep (Cambrex), 1% insulin transferrin selenium, 1% linoleic acid bovine serum albumin, 10 nM dexamethasone, 0.1 mM L-ascorbic-acid-2-phosphate (Sigma, Hamburg, Germany), PDGF-bb and EGF (10ng/ml each, R&D Systems, Wiesbaden, Germany). Tissue culture flasks were coated with 10 ng/ml fibronectin (Sigma) before use.

Culture medium M2 is the commercially available Poietics Human Mesenchymal Stem Cell Medium (PT-3001, Cambrex). MSCM2 were expanded without fibronectin coating following the manufacturer's instructions.

Expansion and sampling of MSC

MSC were cultured at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% carbon dioxide with medium changes twice a week. After 7–10 days, initial colonies were photo-documented, trypsinized and re-plated in a new culture flask (passage 1, P1). Upon sub-confluent growth at a density of 70%, cells were harvested according to the standardized protocol and re-plated at a density of 104 cells/cm2. Photo documentation and cell counting by using a counting chamber was performed at every passage. Cumulative population doublings were calculated as previously described [35]. As cell numbers were first determined at P1, the cumulative doubling number was first calculated for P2. From P2 onward, there were enough cells for simultaneous expansion of one fraction and harvesting another fraction for subsequent analyses: 106 cells were lysed in TRIzol and stored at −80°C for RNA isolation, 106 cells were pelleted and stored at −80°C for DNA preparation and the remaining cells were cryopreserved for immunophenotyping and in vitro differentiation.

Immunophenotypic analysis

Cryopreserved samples of different MSC passages of the same donor were simultaneously taken into culture at density of 2×104 cells/cm2 and labeled with the following anti-human antibodies: CD13-allophycocyanin (APC, clone WM15, Becton Dickinson [BD], San Jose, USA), CD29-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC, MEM-101a, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), CD34-phycoerythrin (PE, 8G12, BD), CD44-PE (g44-26, BD), CD45-FITC (2D1, BD), CD73-PE (AD2, BD), CD90-PE (G7, BD), CD105-PE (MHCD10504, BD), CD146-PE (P1H12, BD), CD166-PE (3A6, BD), CD184-PE (12G5, BD). Dead cells were discriminated as PI positive. More than 5×104 labeled cells were acquired and analyzed using an upgraded 5-color FACScan flow cytometry system (Cytek Development Inc., Fremont, USA) running CellQuest 3.3 software (BD).

In vitro differentiation

In vitro differentiation was simultaneously analyzed in different cryopreserved MSC passages of the same donor. To induce osteogenic differentiation, cells were re-plated at 2×104 cells/cm2 and cultured for three weeks in DMEM with 10% FCS (Invitrogen), 10 mM β-glycerophosphate, 10−7 M dexamethasone, and 0.2 mM ascorbic acid and with medium changes every 3 to 4 days as previously described [1], [53]. After 21 days, cells were analyzed by either von Kossa or Alizarin red staining. Alizarin red staining was semiquantitatively analyzed at λ595 nm using a plate reader (Bio-TEK-instruments Inc., Winooski, VT, USA). For adipogenic differentiation, cells were plated at 2×104 cells/cm2 and cultured in DMEM with 10% FCS, 0.5 mM isobutyl-methylxanthine (IBMX), 1 µM dexamethasone, 10 µM insulin, 200 µM indomethacin, and Oil Red-O staining was performed after 21 days [19] and analyzed semiquantitatively at λ595 nm as described above. Chondrogenic differentiation was achieved through culturing of a pellet of 2.2×105 cells in differentiation medium for three weeks with subsequent assessment of acid mucopolysaccharides by 1% Alcian blue (Chroma, Köngen, Germany) for 10–30 min. [54].

Senescence associated β-galactosidase staining

Expression of pH-dependent senescence associated β-galactosidase (SA-β-gal) activity was analyzed simultaneously in different passages of MSC using the SA-β-gal staining kit (Cell Signaling Technology, Boston, MA) [24].

RNA isolation

Total RNA was isolated using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Paisley, Scotland) according to the manufacturer's instructions. RNA quality was controlled using the RNA 6000 Pico LabChip kit (Agilent, Waldbronn, Germany) and quantified with a NanoDrop ND-1000 Spectrophotometer (Nanodrop Technologies, Wilmington, USA).

Microarray analysis

Two µg total RNA was amplified with GeneChip one-cycle target labeling kit (Affymetrix, High Wycombe, United Kingdom) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Quality of amplified RNA was controlled by LabChip technology (only the sample of donor 1 P9 could repeatedly not be amplified). GeneChip Human Genome U133_Plus_2.0 (Affymetrix) were hybridized with 15 µg amplified RNA, washed with a fluidics station 450 (Affymetrix), and scanned with GeneChip scanner 3000 (Affymetrix). The complete microarray data have been deposited in NCBIs Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) and are accessible through GEO Series accession number GSE9593. For subsequent analyses, only those probe sets were considered that were detectable in at least 10 of the 13 hybridizations (19,448 ESTs). Microarray data were normalized to the median and log2ratios were calculated versus P2 of the corresponding donor sample. Genes that were more than 2-fold up- or down- regulated in median of all three donor samples were further classified by GeneOntology analysis using GoMiner software (http://discover.nci.nih.gov/gominer/) and representation in functional categories was analyzed by Fischer's Exact p-value test (P<0.0001). Lists of regulated genes were assembled using Significant Analysis of Microarrays (SAM) [55]. Unsupervised hierarchical cluster analysis was performed by Euclidean distance (average linkage clustering) using the MultiExperiment Viewer (MeV, TM4) [56]. Chromosomal distribution of differentially regulated genes was analyzed by Chromosomal Co-Localization probability calculator (ChroCoLoc) [57].

Quantitative real-time PCR analysis

Quantification of mRNA expression for candidate genes was performed by real-time quantitative PCR (QRT-PCR) using the ABI PRISM® 7700HT Sequence Detection System Instrument (Applied Biosystems, Applera Deutschland GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany). Total RNA was reverse transcribed by using the high capacity cDNA reverse transcription kit (Applied Biosystems). Primers were obtained from Biospring (Frankfurt, Germany) (Table 2). QRT-PCR reactions were performed with the power SYBR® green PCR master mix in a MicroAmp optical 96-well reaction plate with a ABI PRISM® 7700HT sequence detector (Applied Biosystems) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Relative gene expression levels were normalized to GAPDH expression, which was used as a housekeeping gene.

Table 2
Primer sequences.

miRNA profiling

Total RNA (3 µg) was labeled with a Cy3-conjugated RNA linker (Biospring, Frankfurt, Germany) and hybridized to miCHIP as previously described [29], [58]. miCHIP is based on locked nucleic acid (LNA) technology, whereby LNA-modified, Tm-normalized miRCURY capture probes (Exiqon, Vedbaek, Denmark) designed to target 322 unique human miRNAs (miRbase v8.0, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, http://microrna.sanger.ac.uk/) were printed onto Codelink slides (GE Healthcare, Chalfont St Giles, United Kingdom). Array images were generated by using the Genepix 4200AL laser scanner (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, USA) in batches using the Genepix auto PMT (Photo Multiplayer) algorithm, with pixel saturation tolerance set to 0.2%. Tiff images generated by the Genepix 4200AL laser scanner were processed by the Genepix 6 microarray analysis software (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, USA). Artifact-associated spots were eliminated both by software- and visual-guided flags. Signal intensities were measured according to the local background subtraction method. All probes were spotted in quadruplicate and the median signal intensity of these was calculated. This dataset has also been deposited in GEO and are accessible through the series accession number GSE9664. MiCHIP data were median normalized and the log2ratios of P2 versus the corresponding senescent passage was determined. For subsequent analyses, only those probe sets were considered that were detectable in at least 10 of the 14 hybridizations (264 miRNAs). SAM analysis and hierarchical cluster analysis was applied using the same parameters as described for mRNA expression data [55], [56].

RT-PCR analysis of miRNA expression

Expression of hsa-mir-29c, hsa-mir-369-5p and hsa-let-7f was further analyzed using miRNA TaqMan assays according to the manufacture's instructions (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, USA). Ten ng of total RNA was used for each reverse transcription. QRT experiments were performed by using the ABI 7500 real time PCR system (Applied Biosystems). Relative miRNA expression levels were determined in relation to RNU24 abundance.

Acknowledgments

We thank Tomi Ivacevic (EMBL, Heidelberg) for excellent assistance with RNA amplification and microarray hybridization, Jens Stolte (EMBL, Heidelberg) for QRT-PCR analysis of miRNAs, Heiner Bürgers (Department of Physiology, University of Heidelberg) for support in semi-quantitative analysis of in vitro differentiation assays.

Footnotes

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Funding: This work was supported by the German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) within the National Genome Research Network NGFN-2 (EP-S19T01) and within the supporting program “cell based regenerative medicine” (START-MSC), the German Research Foundation DFG (HO 914/7-1), the Joachim Siebeneicher-Stiftung, Germany and the Academy of Sciences and Humanities, Heidelberg (WIN-Kolleg).

References

1. Reyes M, Lund T, Lenvik T, Aguiar D, Koodie L, et al. Purification and ex vivo expansion of postnatal human marrow mesodermal progenitor cells. Blood. 2001;98:2615–2625. [PubMed]
2. Jiang Y, Jahagirdar BN, Reinhardt RL, Schwartz RE, Keene CD, et al. Pluripotency of mesenchymal stem cells derived from adult marrow. Nature. 2002;418:41–49. [PubMed]
3. Petersen BE, Bowen WC, Patrene KD, Mars WM, Sullivan AK, et al. Bone marrow as a potential source of hepatic oval cells. Science. 1999;284:1168–1170. [PubMed]
4. Schwartz RE, Reyes M, Koodie L, Jiang Y, Blackstad M, et al. Multipotent adult progenitor cells from bone marrow differentiate into functional hepatocyte-like cells. J Clin Invest. 2002;109:1291–1302. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
5. Horwitz EM, Le BK, Dominici M, Mueller I, Slaper-Cortenbach I, et al. Clarification of the nomenclature for MSC: The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement. Cytotherapy. 2005;7:393–395. [PubMed]
6. Dominici M, Le Blanc K, Mueller I, Slaper-Cortenbach I, Marini F, et al. Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement. Cytotherapy. 2006;8:315–317. [PubMed]
7. Wagner W, Ho AD. Mesenchymal stem cell preparations - comparing apples and oranges. Stem Cell Rev. 2007;3:239–248. [PubMed]
8. Hayflick L. The limited in vitro lifetime of human diploid cell strains. Exp Cell Res. 1965;37:614–636. [PubMed]
9. Ho AD, Wagner W, Mahlknecht U. Stem cells and ageing. The potential of stem cells to overcome age-related deteriorations of the body in regenerative medicine. EMBO Rep. 2005;6:35–38. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. Bonab MM, Alimoghaddam K, Talebian F, Ghaffari SH, Ghavamzadeh A, et al. Aging of mesenchymal stem cell in vitro. BMC Cell Biol. 2006;7:14. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Baxter MA, Wynn RF, Jowitt SN, Wraith JE, Fairbairn LJ, et al. Study of telomere length reveals rapid aging of human marrow stromal cells following in vitro expansion. Stem Cells. 2004;22:675–682. [PubMed]
12. Banfi A, Muraglia A, Dozin B, Mastrogiacomo M, Cancedda R, et al. Proliferation kinetics and differentiation potential of ex vivo expanded human bone marrow stromal cells: Implications for their use in cell therapy. Exp Hematol. 2000;28:707–715. [PubMed]
13. Noer A, Boquest AC, Collas P. Dynamics of adipogenic promoter DNA methylation during clonal culture of human adipose stem cells to senescence. BMC Cell Biol. 2007;8:18. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Hayflick L. Biological aging is no longer an unsolved problem. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007;1100:1–13. [PubMed]
15. O'Hare MJ, Bond J, Clarke C, Takeuchi Y, Atherton AJ, et al. Conditional immortalization of freshly isolated human mammary fibroblasts and endothelial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:646–651. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Di Donna S, Mamchaoui K, Cooper RN, Seigneurin-Venin S, Tremblay J, et al. Telomerase can extend the proliferative capacity of human myoblasts, but does not lead to their immortalization. Mol Cancer Res. 2003;1:643–653. [PubMed]
17. Janzen V, Forkert R, Fleming HE, Saito Y, Waring MT, et al. Stem-cell ageing modified by the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p16INK4a. Nature. 2006;443:421–426. [PubMed]
18. Kiyono T, Foster SA, Koop JI, McDougall JK, Galloway DA, et al. Both Rb/p16INK4a inactivation and telomerase activity are required to immortalize human epithelial cells. Nature. 1998;396:84–88. [PubMed]
19. Pittenger MF, Mackay AM, Beck SC, Jaiswal RK, Douglas R, et al. Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science. 1999;284:143–147. [PubMed]
20. Wagner W, Wein F, Seckinger A, Frankhauser M, Wirkner U, et al. Comparative characteristics of mesenchymal stem cells from human bone marrow, adipose tissue, and umbilical cord blood. Exp Hematol. 2005;33:1402–1416. [PubMed]
21. Hauner H, Entenmann G, Wabitsch M, Gaillard D, Ailhaud G, et al. Promoting effect of glucocorticoids on the differentiation of human adipocyte precursor cells cultured in a chemically defined medium. J Clin Invest. 1989;84:1663–1670. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
22. Kogler G, Sensken S, Airey JA, Trapp T, Muschen M, et al. A new human somatic stem cell from placental cord blood with intrinsic pluripotent differentiation potential. J Exp Med. 2004;200:123–135. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Niemeyer P, Krause U, Fellenberg J, Kasten P, Seckinger A, et al. Evaluation of mineralized collagen and alpha-tricalcium phosphate as scaffolds for tissue engineering of bone using human mesenchymal stem cells. Cells Tissues Organs. 2004;177:68–78. [PubMed]
24. Dimri GP, Lee X, Basile G, Acosta M, Scott G, et al. A biomarker that identifies senescent human cells in culture and in aging skin in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92:9363–9367. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Abdelmagid SM, Barbe MF, Arango-Hisijara I, Owen TA, Popoff SN, et al. Osteoactivin acts as downstream mediator of BMP-2 effects on osteoblast function. J Cell Physiol. 2007;210:26–37. [PubMed]
26. Ihrie RA, Marques MR, Nguyen BT, Horner JS, Papazoglu C, et al. Perp is a p63-regulated gene essential for epithelial integrity. Cell. 2005;120:843–856. [PubMed]
27. Schoch G, Seeger H, Bogousslavsky J, Tolnay M, Janzer RC, et al. Analysis of prion strains by PrPSc profiling in sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. PLoS Med. 2006;3:14. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
28. Lacey DL, Timms E, Tan HL, Kelley MJ, Dunstan CR, et al. Osteoprotegerin ligand is a cytokine that regulates osteoclast differentiation and activation. Cell. 1998;93:165–176. [PubMed]
29. Castoldi M, Schmidt S, Benes V, Noerholm M, Kulozik AE, et al. A sensitive array for microRNA expression profiling (miChip) based on locked nucleic acids (LNA). RNA. 2006;12:913–920. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
30. Kern S, Eichler H, Stoeve J, Kluter H, Bieback K. Comparative analysis of mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow, umbilical cord blood, or adipose tissue. Stem Cells. 2006;24:1294–1301. [PubMed]
31. Colter DC, Class R, DiGirolamo CM, Prockop DJ. Rapid expansion of recycling stem cells in cultures of plastic-adherent cells from human bone marrow. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:3213–3218. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
32. Fehrer C, Brunauer R, Laschober G, Unterluggauer H, Reitinger S, et al. Reduced oxygen tension attenuates differentiation capacity of human mesenchymal stem cells and prolongs their lifespan. Aging Cell. 2007;6:745–757. [PubMed]
33. Wagner W, Roderburg C, Wein F, Diehlmann A, Frankhauser M, et al. Molecular and Secretory Profiles of Human Mesenchymal Stromal Cells and their Abilities to Maintain Primitive Hematopoietic Progenitors. Stem Cells. 2007;10:2638–2657. [PubMed]
34. Stenderup K, Justesen J, Clausen C, Kassem M. Aging is associated with decreased maximal life span and accelerated senescence of bone marrow stromal cells. Bone. 2003;33:919–926. [PubMed]
35. Cristofalo VJ, Allen RG, Pignolo RJ, Martin BG, Beck JC. Relationship between donor age and the replicative lifespan of human cells in culture: a reevaluation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:10614–10619. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
36. Mareschi K, Ferrero I, Rustichelli D, Aschero S, Gammaitoni L, et al. Expansion of mesenchymal stem cells isolated from pediatric and adult donor bone marrow. J Cell Biochem. 2006;97:744–754. [PubMed]
37. Fehrer C, Lepperdinger G. Mesenchymal stem cell aging. Exp Gerontol. 2005;40:926–930. [PubMed]
38. Shelton DN, Chang E, Whittier PS, Choi D, Funk WD. Microarray analysis of replicative senescence. Curr Biol. 1999;9:939–945. [PubMed]
39. Zhang H, Pan KH, Cohen SN. Senescence-specific gene expression fingerprints reveal cell-type-dependent physical clustering of up-regulated chromosomal loci. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:3251–3256. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
40. Wagner W, Feldmann RE, Jr, Seckinger A, Maurer MH, Wein F, et al. The heterogeneity of human mesenchymal stem cell preparations-Evidence from simultaneous analysis of proteomes and transcriptomes. Exp Hematol. 2006;34:536–548. [PubMed]
41. Ning Y, Weber JL, Killary AM, Ledbetter DH, Smith JR, et al. Genetic analysis of indefinite division in human cells: evidence for a cell senescence-related gene(s) on human chromosome 4. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991;88:5635–5639. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
42. Bryce SD, Morrison V, Craig NJ, Forsyth NR, Fitzsimmons SA, et al. A mortality gene(s) for the human adenocarcinoma line HeLa maps to a 130-kb region of human chromosome 4q22-q23. Neoplasia. 2002;4:544–550. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
43. Puca AA, Daly MJ, Brewster SJ, Matise TC, Barrett J, et al. A genome-wide scan for linkage to human exceptional longevity identifies a locus on chromosome 4. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:10505–10508. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
44. Weibel J, Sorensen MD, Kristensen P. Identification of genes involved in healthy aging and longevity. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;1067:317–322. [PubMed]
45. Pillai RS. MicroRNA function: multiple mechanisms for a tiny RNA? RNA. 2005;11:1753–1761. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
46. Zamore PD, Haley B. Ribo-gnome: the big world of small RNAs. Science. 2005;309:1519–1524. [PubMed]
47. Bartel DP. MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell. 2004;116:281–297. [PubMed]
48. Ibanez-Ventoso C, Yang M, Guo S, Robins H, Padgett RW, et al. Modulated microRNA expression during adult lifespan in Caenorhabditis elegans. Aging Cell. 2006;5:235–246. [PubMed]
49. Boehm M, Slack F. A developmental timing microRNA and its target regulate life span in C. elegans. Science. 2005;310:1954–1957. [PubMed]
50. Williams AE, Perry MM, Moschos SA, Lindsay MA. microRNA expression in the aging mouse lung. BMC Genomics. 2007;8:172. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
51. Fabbri M, Garzon R, Cimmino A, Liu Z, Zanesi N, et al. MicroRNA-29 family reverts aberrant methylation in lung cancer by targeting DNA methyltransferases 3A and 3B. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:15805–15810. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
52. Chambers SM, Shaw CA, Gatza C, Fisk CJ, Donehower LA, et al. Aging hematopoietic stem cells decline in function and exhibit epigenetic dysregulation. PLoS Biol. 2007;5:201. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
53. Haynesworth SE, Baber MA, Caplan AI. Cell surface antigens on human marrow-derived mesenchymal cells are detected by monoclonal antibodies. Bone. 1992;13:69–80. [PubMed]
54. Hennig T, Lorenz H, Thiel A, Goetzke K, Dickhut A, et al. Reduced chondrogenic potential of adipose tissue derived stromal cells correlates with an altered TGFbeta receptor and BMP profile and is overcome by BMP-6. J Cell Physiol. 2007;211:682–691. [PubMed]
55. Tusher VG, Tibshirani R, Chu G. Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:5116–5121. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
56. Saeed AI, Sharov V, White J, Li J, Liang W, et al. TM4: a free, open-source system for microarray data management and analysis. Biotechniques. 2003;34:374–378. [PubMed]
57. Blake J, Schwager C, Kapushesky M, Brazma A. ChroCoLoc: an application for calculating the probability of co-localization of microarray gene expression. Bioinformatics. 2006;22:765–767. [PubMed]
58. Castoldi M, Benes V, Hentze MW, Muckenthaler MU. miChip: a microarray platform for expression profiling of microRNAs based on locked nucleic acid (LNA) oligonucleotide capture probes. Methods. 2007;43:146–152. [PubMed]

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of Public Library of Science

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...