![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||
Alzheimer’s Disease Peptide Epitope Vaccine Reduces Insoluble But Not Soluble/Oligomeric Aβ Species in Amyloid Precursor Protein Transgenic Mice 1The Institute for Brain Aging and Dementia, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California 92697-4540 2Department of Neurology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California 92697-4540 3The Institute for Molecular Medicine, Department of Immunology, Huntington Beach, California 92647 *I.P. and A.G. contributed equally to this work. ‡D.H.C. and M.G.A. contributed equally to this work as senior authors. Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Michael G. Agadjanyan, The Institute for Molecular Medicine, 16371, Gothard Street, H, Huntington Beach, CA 92647-3652. E-mail: magadjanyan/at/immed.org The publisher's final edited version of this article is available free at J Neurosci. See other articles in PMC that cite the published article.Abstract Active vaccination of elderly Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients with fibrillar amyloid-β peptide (Aβ42), even in the presence of a potent Th1 adjuvant, induced generally low titers of antibodies in a small fraction (~20% responders) of those that received the AN-1792 vaccine. To improve the immunogenicity and reduce the likelihood of inducing adverse autoreactive T-cells specific for Aβ42, we previously tested in wild-type mice an alternative approach for active immunization: an epitope vaccine that selectively initiate B cell responses toward an immunogenic self-epitope of Aβ in the absence of anti-Aβ T cell responses. Here, we describe a second generation epitope vaccine composed of two copies of Aβ1–11 fused with the promiscuous nonself T cell epitope, PADRE (pan human leukocyte antigen DR-binding peptide) that completely eliminates the autoreactive T cell responses and induces humoral immune responses in amyloid precursor protein transgenic 2576 mice with pre-existing AD-like pathology. Based on the titers of anti-Aβ1–11 antibody experimental mice were divided into low, moderate and high responders, and for the first time we report a positive correlation between the concentration of anti-Aβ1–11 antibody and a reduction of insoluble, cerebral Aβ plaques. The reduction of insoluble Aβ deposition was not associated with adverse events, such as CNS T cell or macrophage infiltration or microhemorrhages. Surprisingly, vaccination did not alter the levels of soluble Aβ. Alternatively, early protective immunization before substantial neuropathology, neuronal loss and cognitive deficits have become firmly established may be more beneficial and safer for potential patients, especially if they can be identified in a preclinical stage by the development of antecedent biomarkers of AD. Keywords: immunotherapy, Alzheimer’s disease, epitope vaccine, antibody, PADRE, β-amyloid Introduction The age-related accumulation of amyloid-β (Aβ) in the CNS has been hypothesized to play a central role in a cascade of events that eventually induces neuronal loss in affected brain regions in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) (Selkoe, 1991, 1994; Hardy and Higgins, 1992; Price and Sisodia, 1994; Esler and Wolfe, 2001; Hardy and Selkoe, 2002). Previously, major support for the amyloid cascade hypothesis emerged from Aβ-immunotherapy studies demonstrated that anti-Aβ antibodies were capable of reducing AD-like pathology (Schenk et al., 1999) and improving behavior in amyloid precursor protein (APP) transgenic (Tg) mice (Chen et al., 2000; Janus et al., 2000; Morgan et al., 2000). First, immunotherapy clinical trial in AD patients using the AN-1792 vaccine containing B and T cell “self epitopes” of Aβ42 was halted during Phase IIa, when ~6% of the participants developed aseptic meningoencephalitis (Schenk, 2002; Weiner and Selkoe, 2002; Hock et al., 2003; Nicoll et al., 2003; Orgogozo et al., 2003; Ferrer et al., 2004; Bayer et al., 2005; Fox et al., 2005; Gilman et al., 2005; Masliah et al., 2005; Patton et al., 2006). Importantly, only vaccinated participants (n = 18) developed meningoencephalitis, whereas none of the control patients (n = 72) injected with placebo developed adverse events (Orgogozo et al., 2003). Data from these trials suggest that the aseptic meningoencephalitis may have been caused by a T cell-mediated autoimmune response (Nicoll et al., 2003; Ferrer et al., 2004), and that anti-Aβ antibodies were not responsible for the observed adverse effects after active vaccination. In fact, low/moderate titers of anti-Aβ antibodies generated in a small subset of immunized patients (19.7%) were capable of reducing parenchymal amyloid pathology (Nicoll et al., 2003, 2006; Ferrer et al., 2004; Masliah et al., 2005; Patton et al., 2006; Boche et al., 2007; Nitsch and Hock, 2007) and diminishing progressive cognitive decline associated with the disease (Hock et al., 2003; Gilman et al., 2005). However, ~80% of the immunized subjects failed to develop anti-Aβ antibody titers (“nonresponders”), indicating that the Aβ self-antigen in the AN-1792 vaccine was not a strong immunogen, thus suggesting that alternative immunotherapeutic strategies should be pursued. Based on the results generated in mouse models of AD (Bard et al., 2000; DeMattos et al., 2001; Dodart et al., 2002), a new clinical trial, AAB-001 (Elan and Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, http://elan.com/investorrelations/events/elanwyethsymposium_adpd.asp), has been initiated by using passive transfer of a humanized monoclonal anti-Aβ antibody (bapineuzumab) in an attempt to avoid the problems associated with active immunization of elderly AD patients. However, the design of this new trial is associated with additional challenges such as multiple injections of high concentrations of anti-Aβ antibody every 13 weeks, the high cost of this monoclonal humanized antibody as well as possible side effects of passive vaccination, including microhemorrhages observed in passively immunized very old APP Tg mice (Pfeifer et al., 2002; Wilcock et al., 2004; Racke et al., 2005). This suggests that development of safe active immunotherapeutic strategies may still be desirable. Previously, we engineered and tested a first generation epitope vaccine in wild-type mice (Agadjanyan et al., 2005), and here we report the development and testing the safety and efficacy of therapeutic vaccination of APP Tg 2576 mice with pre-existing AD-like pathology with a second generation epitope vaccine composed of two copies of the B cell epitope, Aβ1–11 in tandem with pan human leukocyte antigen DR-binding peptide (PADRE), a synthetic, foreign promiscuous T cell epitope [preexisting AD-like pathology implies the accumulation of soluble oligomeric forms of amyloid-beta peptide leading to the impairment of cognitive functions in ≥6-month-old APP Tg 2576 mice (Lesne et al., 2006)]. Materials and Methods Mice, epitope vaccine, peptide immunogens, and experimental protocol Aged (~9.4 months old) female APP Tg 2576 mice were bred and provided by the animal facility associated with the University of California at Irvine (UCI) Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center. All animals were housed in a temperature and light-cycle controlled facility, and their care was under the guidelines of the National Institutes of Health and an approved Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee protocol at University of California at Irvine. To engineer an epitope AD vaccine, we synthesized the N terminus of an immunodominant B cell epitope of Aβ1–11 (McLaurin et al., 2002; Bard et al., 2003; Cribbs et al., 2003) in tandem with a promiscuous foreign T cell epitope, so called pan-DR epitope, PADRE (Alexander et al., 1994). The peptide 2Aβ1–11-PADRE was synthesized as a multiple antigenic peptide (MAP), containing a core matrix of 4 branching lysines (Tam, 1988; Chai et al., 1992) to generate 2Aβ1–11-PADRE-MAP (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Aβ42 peptide was synthesized at the Peptide Core Facility at the Institute for Brain Aging and Dementia at UCI by solid-phase Fmoc amino acid substitution and purified by reverse-phase high-pressure liquid chromatography. Mice were immunized with 2Aβ1–11-PADRE-MAP or fAβ42 as described previously (Cribbs et al., 2003; Petrushina et al., 2003; Agadjanyan et al., 2005). Briefly, 2Aβ1–11-PADRE-MAP (500 µg/ml) or the fibrillar (Schenk et al., 1999; Cribbs et al., 2003) Aβ42 peptide (500 µg/ml) were mixed with Quil A, a Th1-type conventional adjuvant, and mice were injected with 50 µg of antigen subcutaneously. Experimental mice at age 9.4 ± 0.9 months old were immunized with 2Aβ1–11-PADRE-MAP (n = 21) or fAβ42 (n = 12), whereas the control group of APP Tg 2576 mice (n = 11) was injected with an adjuvant only. All mice were boosted at monthly intervals. Cellular immune responses were analyzed in five mice from each group killed at 9 d after the fourth immunization. We continued to boost the remaining mice at monthly intervals and sera was collected at 8–10 d after the third, fourth, sixth and 10th immunizations and used for detection of anti-Aβ antibodies. At the end of the study, after 10 vaccinations when animals were 19.4 ± 0.9 months old, neuropathological changes were compared across groups in response to treatment. In these animals, cellular immune responses also were analyzed. T cell proliferation The analysis of T cell proliferation was performed in splenocyte cultures from individual animals, as described previously (Cribbs et al., 2003; Agadjanyan et al., 2005). In addition, CD4+ T cell proliferation was assessed using FACS assay according to the manufacturer’s instructions (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA). Briefly, to detect antigen-specific proliferation of CD4+T cells, we stained splenocyte cultures by 1 µM succinimidyl ester of carboxyfluorescein diacetate (CFSE; Invitrogen) for 10 min at 37°C. After washing, the cells were incubated for 3 d in culture media alone or with PADRE (5 µM). After incubation, the cultures were stained with phycoerythrin (PE)-labeled rat antimouse CD4 monoclonal antibodies (BD Biosciences). Because dead cells might fluoresce nonspecifically, these cells were excluded from the assay using a nucleic acid dye (7-amino actinomycin D from BD PharMingen, San Diego, CA), and proliferation of viable cells was analyzed by FACS-can flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) as described by the manufacturer. CD4+ population was separately analyzed using CellQuest software (BD Biosciences). Production of cytokines by immune splenocytes The same splenocytes used to assess T cell proliferation were used for detection of Th1 (IFNγ) or Th2 (IL4) lymphokines by ELISPOT (BD PharMingen) as described previously (Cribbs et al., 2003; Agadjanyan et al., 2005). In addition, the FACS method was used for detection of specific cytokines by CD4+ T cells (Pala et al., 2000). Briefly, the cultures of splenocytes from experimental and control animals were restimulated for 3–4 d with PADRE peptide (5 µM), and then for 4–6 h with PMA (phorbol 12-myristate 12-acetate) and ionophore (ionomycin) (both from Sigma, St. Louis, MO). In addition, we used Brefeldin A (BD Biosciences) to block cytokine secretion, which increases intracellular accumulation. Surface staining was performed using FITC-labeled anti-mouse CD4 monoclonal antibodies (MoAb; BD PharMingen). Cells were washed, fixed, permeabilized, and CD4+T cell subset producing IL-4 or IFNγ was detected using the appropriate PE-labeled anti-mouse cytokine antibodies (BD PharMingen). Detection of anti-Aβ antibodies by ELISA Total anti-Aβ42 antibodies were detected as described previously (Cribbs et al., 2003; Petrushina et al., 2003) with small modifications: to develop the color reaction we used the 3,3′,5,5′ tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) peroxidase substrate (Pierce, Rockford, IL), and plates were analyzed spectrophotometrically at 450 nm. The standard curve for determination of anti-Aβ antibody concentrations in the sera was based on different known concentrations of monoclonal antibody 20.1 kindly provided by Dr. Van Nostrand (Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY). The concentrations of antibody were recorded in micrograms per milliliter. To determine the specific isotypes, pooled sera from mice were diluted 1:2500 and tested in duplicate. As we reported previously, mice of H2bxs immune haplotype (APP Tg 2576) do not express IgG2a, producing IgG2c anti-Aβ antibodies instead (Petrushina et al., 2003). Therefore, in our experiments we used anti-IgG2ab-specific antibodies (BD PharMingen) along with anti-IgG1-, IgG2b- and IgM- specific antibodies (Zymed, San Francisco, CA). Detection of Aβ plaques in human brain tissues Sera from immunized mice were also screened for the ability to bind to Aβ plaques in the human brain as we described previously, using immunohistochemistry (Ghochikyan et al., 2003; Agadjanyan et al., 2005). A digital camera (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) was used to capture images of the plaques at 20× magnification. The binding of antisera (dilution 1:1000) to the β-amyloid plaques was blocked by preabsorption of the sera with 5 µM Aβ1–15 peptide (1 h, 37°C). Immunohistochemistry To analyze the effect of active immunization with the epitope vaccine on neuropathological changes in APP Tg 2576 mice (19.4 ± 0.9 months old), the brains were processed for immunohistochemistry and histochemistry by previously published methods (Ghochikyan et al., 2003; Agadjanyan et al., 2005). Animals were killed under deep Nembutal sodium solution (150 mg/kg, i.p.) anesthesia. To ensure proper fixation and immunostaining of brain tissues, mice were exsanguinated by transcardial perfusion with normal saline. Then brains were removed and bisected in midsagittal plane. The right hemisphere was snap frozen for biochemical analysis, whereas the left hemisphere was fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for immunohistochemical analysis. Forty-micrometer-thick free-floating coronal sections of fixed hemibrains were collected using a vibratome. To assess the extent of neuropathology and neuroinflammation that occurs in the brains of mice, the following primary antibodies were used. Aβ deposits were detected with anti-Aβ42 (dilution, 1:2000; Invitrogen) and anti-Aβ40 (1:10000; Invitrogen). Activated microglia were detected with the anti-I-A/I-E [marker of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) II alloantigens; 1:200; BD PharMingen] and anti-CD45 (1:300; Serotec, Raleigh, NC) antibodies. Astrocytes were labeled with anti-glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP; 1:3000) antibodies (Eng et al., 2000). Infiltration of T cells and macrophages were analyzed using anti-CD3-ε (1:50; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), anti-CD4, anti-CD8 (1:250; Novocastra Laboratories, Newcastle, UK), and anti-F4/80 (1:50; Serotec) antibodies, respectively. The tissues from all animals within a given experimental group were processed in parallel. Sections to be immunostained with anti-Aβ antibodies were pretreated in 90% formic acid for 4 min to enhance Aβ staining (Kitamoto et al., 1987). Sections for the staining with anti-CD45 and anti-I-A/I-E (anti-MHC II) were pretreated with proteinase K (0.03 mg/ml) for 5–7 min at room temperature. Hydrogen peroxide-quenched and blocked sections were incubated with primary antibody overnight at 4°C. Sections were then washed and incubated with appropriate biotinylated secondary antibodies (1 h at room temperature). After multiple washes, the tissues were incubated in ABC for 1 h, and color development was performed using DAB (3,3′- diaminobenzidine) substrate kit (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). Sections were mounted on Vectabond-coated slides (Vector Laboratories), dehydrated, and covered using DPX (BDH Laboratory Supplies, Poole, UK). Fibrillar Aβ deposits were visualized using Thioflavin S (ThS) as described by (Schmidt et al., 1995). Briefly, mouse brain sections were washed with Tris buffer and stained for 10 min with a solution of 0.5% ThS in 50% ethanol. Finally, sections were washed in 50% ethanol and Tris buffer, then dried and covered using Vectashield (Vector Laboratories). Quantitative image analysis NIH imaging was used to analyze the area occupied by β-amyloid and glial reactivity as described previously (Head et al., 2001). Immunostaining was captured using a Sony (Tokyo, Japan) high-resolution CCD video camera (XC-77) and NIH image 1.59b5 software. For every animal, 12 images (525 × 410 µm each) of the frontal parietal region in the cortex at approximately the same plane (0.74 to −2.9 mm with respect to bregma) of two adjacent sections were captured with a 20× or 40× objective. The samples included six images from the superficial layer and the remaining six from the deep layer. NIH imaging was used to analyze the area occupied by β-amyloid (Aβ load) relative to the background, and expressed as the percentage of area occupied. The threshold for detection of immunoreactivity was established and then held constant throughout the image analysis. ThS-positive plaques were counted by visual inspection of cortical region of all stained sections although blind with respect to treatment condition; a mean semiquantitative score was independently determined for each slide by two observers. Prussian blue staining for microhemorrhage Staining for hemosiderin deposits was performed on duplicate adjacent coronal sections of the mice brains containing similar regions located at approximately −1.5 bregma point, 50 µm thick, collected from immunized and naive, age-matched APP Tg 2576 mice. The sections were stained with Prussian blue working solution (equal parts of freshly made 5% potassium ferrocianide and 5% hydrochloric acid) for 30 min at room temperature, washed in deionized water, and counterstained with Nuclear fast red. Possible hemorrhage events in the form of the number of Prussian blue-positive profiles were counted in the brains of each mouse on all sections by two independent observers, and the average number of hemosiderin deposits was calculated per each brain hemisphere. Biochemical analysis Biochemical analysis of the brain tissue was processed as described previously (Kawarabayashi et al., 2001), except that cortices of right hemispheres of brains were used. Briefly, frozen cortices were thawed, minced and then homogenized in 50 mm Tris-HCl buffer containing 2% SDS, pH 8.0, and a mixture of protease inhibitors (MP Biomedicals, Solon, OH). Homogenates were centrifuged (100,000 × g, 1 h, 4°C) and supernatants were stored at −70°C for additional analysis of soluble β-amyloid. Seventy percent formic acid was added to the pellets for extraction of SDS-insoluble β-amyloid. After sonication samples were centrifuged (100,000 × g, 1 h, 4°C) and supernatants were stored for analysis of insoluble β-amyloid. After neutralization of formic acid with 1.0 m Tris-base/0.5 m NaH2P04, concentrations of insoluble and soluble Aβ40 and Aβ42 were analyzed using β-amyloid ELISA kits (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. Plates were analyzed spectrophotometrically at 450 nm via a microplate reader, and the concentrations of Aβ40 and Aβ42 were calculated using standard curves for Aβ40 and Aβ42 peptide by comparing the sample’s absorbance with the absorbance of known concentrations of a standard. Using the wet weight of cortex region in the original homogenate, the final values of Aβ were expressed as micrograms per gram wet weight of cortex. Dot blot assay and combination of IP and WB Soluble fractions from cortical homogenates of experimental and control mice used in ELISA were also used for dot blot assay and for both immunoprecipitation (IP) and Western blot (WB). Total protein concentration in the homogenates was determined using bicinchoninic acid assay (Pierce) and adjusted to 4 mg/ml with PBS. Dot blot Two microliters of sequential dilutions of homogenates were applied to nitrocellulose membrane (GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ), air-dried, and blocked with 5% fat-free dry milk in TBST (10 mm Tris- HCl, pH 8.0, 150 mm NaCl, 0.05% Tween 20). Oligomers were detected by using HRP-conjugated A11 polyclonal antibody (kindly provided by Dr. C. Glabe, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA). Blots were developed with ECL detection system (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Autoradiograms were scanned, and densitometry of Aβ oligomer spots was performed with NIH Image J software, version 1.36b. The relative optical density was calculated and presented as average value ±SD for each group. IP and WB Aliquots of homogenates were pooled into four groups (based on low, moderate, high anti-Aβ antibody responders and control nonimmunized mice, 200 µg of total protein in each pooled aliquot), diluted to 500 µl with PBS and incubated (overnight at 4°C) with anti-Aβ 20.1 monoclonal antibody immobilized on protein G-sepharose. The beads were washed three times in PBS, and proteins were eluted in 20 µl of SDS-PAGE loading buffer by boiling. Samples were subjected to electrophoresis on 12.5% SDS-Tris polyacrylamide gel and proteins were electrotransferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (GE Healthcare). The membrane was boiled for 2 min and blocked with 5% fat-free dry milk followed by detection of Aβ oligomers using anti-Aβ biotinylated 20.1 monoclonal antibody. Three experiments with the same homogenates were performed and Western blots were scanned and converted into digital files. Densitometry of Aβ oligomer bands were performed using NIH Image J software, version 1.36b and data (average ± SD) were presented from three experiments. Statistical analysis All statistical parameters (mean, SD, significant difference, etc.) used in experiments were calculated using Prism 3.03 software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). Statistically significant differences were examined using an ANOVA and post hoc comparisons were done using Tukey’s test (p < 0.05 was considered as statistically different). Results The second generation epitope vaccine stimulates CD4+IFNγ+ T cells specific to PADRE without activation of autoreactive anti-Aβ T helper cells To circumvent the side effects of the AN-1792 vaccine against AD, we engineered a vaccine in which a foreign T helper cell epitope was incorporated with two copies of the B cell epitope of Aβ42. APP Tg 2576 mice vaccinated with 2Aβ1–11-PADRE-MAP induced T cell responses directed against the foreign antigenic determinant, PADRE, but not against self Aβ antigen. More specifically, splenocytes isolated from vaccinated animals proliferated after re-stimulation with PADRE, but not Aβ40 (Fig. 1A
Direct measurement of activation of PADRE-specific CD4+ T helper cells in vaccinated APP Tg 2576 mice by a FACS assay confirmed these results. CD4+ T cells from mice vaccinated with the peptide epitope vaccine induced strong proliferation of this subset of T cells after restimulation with nonself PADRE peptide, but not Aβ40 (Fig. 1B To further investigate T cell responses to vaccination, we analyzed Th1 (IFNγ) and Th2 (IL-4) cytokine production by splenocytes and CD4+ T cells from immunized and control APP Tg 2576 mice using ELISPOT and FACS assays, respectively (Fig. 1C,D Anti-PADRE-specific CD4+IFNγ+ T lymphocytes help B cells to produce therapeutically potent anti-Aβ1–11 specific antibody in vaccinated APP Tg 2576 To determine the ability of activated PADRE-specific T cells to stimulate anti-Aβ B cells, we measured antibody concentrations in the sera pooled from each group of animals after three, four, six, and 10 immunizations. After three injections of the epitope vaccine the concentrations of anti-Aβ antibodies in the sera were higher than that in mice immunized with fAβ42. However, after the sixth immunization this difference in anti-Aβ antibody titers steadily diminished, becoming equal after the last two boosts in both groups (Fig. 2A
As mentioned above, these data were generated with sera pooled from each of the group; however, in individual animals we found significant variability in anti-Aβ antibody responses (Fig. 2B To characterize the types of humoral immune responses from each vaccination group, we measured the production of IgG1, IgG2ab, IgG2b, and IgM anti-Aβ antibodies in the sera collected from individual animals after a total of 10 injections of the epitope vaccine or fAβ42. All mice vaccinated with the epitope vaccine generated comparable amounts of IgG1, IgG2ab, and as a result, the average of IgG1/IgG2ab ratio was close to 1 (Fig. 2F The link between anti-Aβ1–11 antibody concentrations and clearance/reduction of AD-like neuropathology in the brains of APP Tg 2576 mouse model of AD To demonstrate the therapeutic efficacy of anti-Aβ antibodies generated in response to the peptide epitope vaccine, we analyzed neuropathological changes in aged (19.4 ± 0.9 months old) experimental and control APP Tg 2576 mice (after 10 injections). Figure 3
As described previously, data from the first human clinical trial indicated that AD patients responding to the AN-1792 vaccine and producing anti-Aβ antibody titers over 1:2200 showed some slowing of cognitive decline and localized reduction of plaques (Hock et al., 2003; Gilman et al., 2005; Masliah et al., 2005; Nicoll et al., 2006). To address this question in our preclinical trials, we grouped all mice vaccinated with the epitope vaccine based on the concentrations of generated anti-Aβ antibodies (Fig. 2C–E
To further confirm an association between serum antibody concentrations and differential effects on reducing Aβ40 or Aβ42, we measured insoluble Aβ40 and Aβ42 in cortical homogenates of experimental and control mice by sandwich ELISA. Insoluble Aβ40 and Aβ42 concentrations were significantly lower in the cortex of mice vaccinated with the epitope vaccine or fAβ42, compared with control animals (Fig. 5A,B
A potential problem of immunotherapy is that reduction of insoluble Aβ may lead to increased levels of soluble forms of this peptide (Patton et al., 2006), possibly oligomers, which are known to be more neurotoxic and can impair cognitive function (Klein et al., 2001; Gong et al., 2003; Cleary et al., 2005; Klyubin et al., 2005; Lesne et al., 2006). Accordingly, we measured soluble Aβ40 and Aβ42 levels in detergent-extracted samples of cortical homogenates of control mice and animals vaccinated with epitope vaccine or fAβ42 by capture ELISA (Fig. 5A,B The effect of vaccination on microglial activation, lymphocyte infiltration, and microhemorrhages To detect inflammation-related pathology in the brains of animals immunized with the epitope vaccine, the same brain regions used for Aβ burden studies were evaluated for microglial activation (MHC class II, CD45), astrocyte hypertrophy (GFAP), and microhemorrhages in blood vessels (Prussian blue). Quantitative image analysis of MHC class II (I-Ab/I-Eb) positive cells demonstrated significantly decreased microglial activation in APP Tg 2576 mice vaccinated with the epitope vaccine, and this decrease was comparable with that seen in the cerebral cortex of mice immunized with fAβ42 (Fig. 6A
Astrocytes in both experimental and control mice were detected using the astrocyte-specific marker (GFAP) and a quantitative image analysis indicated that vaccinated mice had a lesser degree of astrocytosis compared with the control group. However, immunization with epitope vaccine led to a 14% reduction, whereas immunization with fAβ42 resulted in ~53% reduction in GFAP immunoreactivity (Fig. 6J Previously, it was reported that very old APP Tg mice receiving passive transfer of anti-Aβ monoclonal antibodies developed cerebral microhemorrhages (Pfeifer et al., 2002; Wilcock et al., 2004). More recently, it was shown that cerebral amyloid angiopathy-associated microhemorrhages are increased in ~20-month-old APP+presenilin 1 (PS1) transgenic mice immunized eight times with fAβ42 formulated in complete Freunds adjuvant (CFA)/incomplete Freunds adjuvant (IFA) (Wilcock et al., 2007). To assess this potential adverse side effect of epitope vaccine, we selected adjacent coronal sections of mouse brains located at −1.5 bregma and visualized microhemorrhages by detecting hemosiderin (byproduct of degradation of hemoglobin, occurring at the sites of previous microhemorrhages) deposits using Prussian blue staining. Characteristic blue hemosiderin-positive profiles were observed primarily in the neocortical, leptomeningeal, hippocampal and thalamic areas of the brain. These microhemorrhages were detected at a rate of 2.8 ± 0.8 per hemibrain in control nonimmunized mice and 2.6 ± 1.33 in animals immunized with the epitope vaccine. However, vaccination of a group of APP Tg 2576 mice with fAβ42 had resulted in 3.97 ± 1.24 hemosiderin-positive profiles. Although not statistically significant, there was nonetheless approximately a 41% increase compared with the control group, and these data resemble the results generated by (Wilcock et al., 2007) with APP+PS1 aged mice. Thus, immunization with the second generation epitope vaccine did not increase the incidence of cerebral microhemorrhages in ~19-month-old APP Tg 2576 mice (Fig. 6L Discussion Published results from the recently halted AN-1792 clinical trial in patients with AD suggested that aseptic meningoencephalitis was linked to an adverse T cell-mediated autoimmune response (Nicoll et al., 2003; Ferrer et al., 2004). Presence of anti-Aβ antibodies correlated with effective reduction of Aβ pathology in patients that came to autopsy (Nicoll et al., 2003; Ferrer et al., 2004; Masliah et al., 2005), suggesting a possible therapeutic benefit of vaccination (Bayer et al., 2005; Fox et al., 2005; Gilman et al., 2005). We analyzed the effect of different concentrations of anti-Aβ antibodies in serum on neuropathological changes in the brains of actively immunized APP Tg 2576 mice in the absence of an autoreactive anti-Aβ T cell response. We have obtained results somewhat similar to data described in the AN-1792 clinical trial: (1) the higher the concentrations of anti-Aβ antibody specific to the N terminus of Aβ42, the larger the therapeutic effect. The NTB composite z-scores were regressed on the geometric mean antibody titers, although this correlation was not significant (Gilman et al., 2005). (2) AN-1792 vaccine reduced the number of Aβ plaques, but not the level of soluble Aβ in the brains (Patton et al., 2006). To circumvent the side effects of the AN-1792 vaccine and to reduce the potential for cell-mediated autoimmune toxicity in AD patients, we engineered the first (Agadjanyan et al., 2005) generation of epitope vaccine and tested it in wild-type mice. Here, we report on design and testing of the second generation peptide epitope vaccine in APP Tg 2576 mouse model (Hsiao et al., 1996; Kawarabayashi et al., 2001; Westerman et al., 2002), and demonstrated that this prototype AD vaccine induced strong anti-PADRE cellular and anti-Aβ humoral responses (Fig. 1 The AN-1792 clinical trial data demonstrated significant individual variability in anti-Aβ antibody responses in vaccinated AD patients (Bayer et al., 2005; Gilman et al., 2005). As mentioned by Patton et al. (2006), only 59 individuals in the immunized cohort induced desirable antibody titers to immunization with fAβ42. Importantly, some of these AD patients showed a trend toward slowing of cognitive decline associated with the disease (Hock et al., 2003), improvement in the memory domain of the NTB and the decreased CSF tau levels (Gilman et al., 2005). Collectively, these data suggested that higher titers of antibodies might be beneficial for AD patients. Because the concentrations of anti-Aβ antibodies in individual APP Tg 2576 mice vaccinated with our epitope vaccine were not uniform either (Fig. 2B It is difficult to predict the effects of frequent passive delivery of high concentrations of humanized anti-Aβ antibodies in ongoing passive immunotherapy trials with AD patients because this treatment approach may still induce undesirable side effects, for example microhemorrhages. Although these clinical studies are important for the future of Aβ immunotherapy, an effective active immunization approach is still feasible providing that the AD vaccine is safe, induces an adequate antibody response to important B cell epitope of Aβ, and is free of harmful autoreactive T cell responses. The second generation epitope vaccine described in this study induced peripheral anti-PADRE-specific Th1-type proinflammatory responses without infiltration of T cells or macrophages in the brains of vaccinated APP Tg2576 mice. It is known that AN-1792 vaccine caused an increase in cerebral vasculature deposition of Aβ (Masliah et al., 2005; Nicoll et al., 2006; Patton et al., 2006). Previously it was also shown that active Aβ42 vaccination of double transgenic (APP+PS1) mice resulted in significantly increased cerebral amyloid angiopathy and associated microhemorrhages (Wilcock et al., 2007). Although we did not directly investigate the effect of epitope vaccine on Aβ deposition in cerebral vasculature, we demonstrated that anti-Aβ1–11 antibodies did not increase the incidence of cerebral microhemorrhages in the brains of immunized mice (Fig. 6L Acknowledgments This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants AG20241 and NS50895 (D.H.C.) and Alzheimer's Association Grant IIRG-03-6279 (M.G.A.). Additional support for mice and the production of peptides was provided by University of California, Irvive Alzheimer's Disease Research Center Grant P50 AG16573. Dr. Nina Movsesyan was supported by National Institute on Aging training Grant AG00096. We thank Adrine Karapetyan for technical help and valuable comments. References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||
Neuron. 1991 Apr; 6(4):487-98.
[Neuron. 1991]J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1994 Sep; 53(5):438-47.
[J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1994]Science. 1992 Apr 10; 256(5054):184-5.
[Science. 1992]Annu Rev Med. 1994; 45():435-46.
[Annu Rev Med. 1994]Science. 2001 Aug 24; 293(5534):1449-54.
[Science. 2001]Nat Med. 2000 Aug; 6(8):916-9.
[Nat Med. 2000]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jul 17; 98(15):8850-5.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001]Nat Neurosci. 2002 May; 5(5):452-7.
[Nat Neurosci. 2002]Science. 2002 Nov 15; 298(5597):1379.
[Science. 2002]J Neuroinflammation. 2004 Dec 8; 1(1):24.
[J Neuroinflammation. 2004]J Immunol. 2005 Feb 1; 174(3):1580-6.
[J Immunol. 2005]Nature. 2006 Mar 16; 440(7082):352-7.
[Nature. 2006]Nat Med. 2002 Nov; 8(11):1263-9.
[Nat Med. 2002]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Feb 18; 100(4):2023-8.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003]Int Immunol. 2003 Apr; 15(4):505-14.
[Int Immunol. 2003]Immunity. 1994 Dec; 1(9):751-61.
[Immunity. 1994]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Aug; 85(15):5409-13.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988]Int Immunol. 2003 Apr; 15(4):505-14.
[Int Immunol. 2003]Neurosci Lett. 2003 Feb 20; 338(1):5-8.
[Neurosci Lett. 2003]J Immunol. 2005 Feb 1; 174(3):1580-6.
[J Immunol. 2005]Nature. 1999 Jul 8; 400(6740):173-7.
[Nature. 1999]Int Immunol. 2003 Apr; 15(4):505-14.
[Int Immunol. 2003]J Immunol. 2005 Feb 1; 174(3):1580-6.
[J Immunol. 2005]Int Immunol. 2003 Apr; 15(4):505-14.
[Int Immunol. 2003]J Immunol. 2005 Feb 1; 174(3):1580-6.
[J Immunol. 2005]J Immunol Methods. 2000 Sep 21; 243(1-2):107-24.
[J Immunol Methods. 2000]Int Immunol. 2003 Apr; 15(4):505-14.
[Int Immunol. 2003]Neurosci Lett. 2003 Feb 20; 338(1):5-8.
[Neurosci Lett. 2003]Eur J Immunol. 2003 Dec; 33(12):3232-41.
[Eur J Immunol. 2003]J Immunol. 2005 Feb 1; 174(3):1580-6.
[J Immunol. 2005]Eur J Immunol. 2003 Dec; 33(12):3232-41.
[Eur J Immunol. 2003]J Immunol. 2005 Feb 1; 174(3):1580-6.
[J Immunol. 2005]Neurochem Res. 2000 Oct; 25(9-10):1439-51.
[Neurochem Res. 2000]Lab Invest. 1987 Aug; 57(2):230-6.
[Lab Invest. 1987]Am J Pathol. 1995 Aug; 147(2):503-15.
[Am J Pathol. 1995]Neurobiol Dis. 2001 Oct; 8(5):792-806.
[Neurobiol Dis. 2001]J Neurosci. 2001 Jan 15; 21(2):372-81.
[J Neurosci. 2001]Neuron. 2003 May 22; 38(4):547-54.
[Neuron. 2003]Neurology. 2005 May 10; 64(9):1553-62.
[Neurology. 2005]Neurology. 2005 Jan 11; 64(1):129-31.
[Neurology. 2005]J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2006 Nov; 65(11):1040-8.
[J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2006]Science. 1996 Oct 4; 274(5284):99-102.
[Science. 1996]Am J Pathol. 2006 Sep; 169(3):1048-63.
[Am J Pathol. 2006]Trends Neurosci. 2001 Apr; 24(4):219-24.
[Trends Neurosci. 2001]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Sep 2; 100(18):10417-22.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003]Nat Neurosci. 2005 Jan; 8(1):79-84.
[Nat Neurosci. 2005]Nat Med. 2005 May; 11(5):556-61.
[Nat Med. 2005]Science. 2002 Nov 15; 298(5597):1379.
[Science. 2002]J Neuroinflammation. 2004 Dec 8; 1(1):24.
[J Neuroinflammation. 2004]Neuroscience. 2007 Feb 9; 144(3):950-60.
[Neuroscience. 2007]Brain. 2003 Feb; 126(Pt 2):285-91.
[Brain. 2003]Eur J Immunol. 2003 Dec; 33(12):3232-41.
[Eur J Immunol. 2003]Nat Med. 2003 Apr; 9(4):448-52.
[Nat Med. 2003]Brain Pathol. 2004 Jan; 14(1):11-20.
[Brain Pathol. 2004]Neurology. 2005 Jan 11; 64(1):129-31.
[Neurology. 2005]Neurology. 2005 Jan 11; 64(1):94-101.
[Neurology. 2005]Neurology. 2005 May 10; 64(9):1563-72.
[Neurology. 2005]Neurology. 2005 Jan 11; 64(1):94-101.
[Neurology. 2005]Neurology. 2005 May 10; 64(9):1553-62.
[Neurology. 2005]Am J Pathol. 2006 Sep; 169(3):1048-63.
[Am J Pathol. 2006]Neuron. 2003 May 22; 38(4):547-54.
[Neuron. 2003]Nature. 2000 Dec 21-28; 408(6815):979-82.
[Nature. 2000]Neurology. 2005 Jan 11; 64(1):129-31.
[Neurology. 2005]J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2006 Nov; 65(11):1040-8.
[J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2006]Am J Pathol. 2006 Sep; 169(3):1048-63.
[Am J Pathol. 2006]Neuroscience. 2007 Feb 9; 144(3):950-60.
[Neuroscience. 2007]J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006 Jul; 61(7):755-8.
[J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006]