Logo of brjcancerBJC HomepageBJC Advance online publicationBJC Current IssueSubmitting an article to BJCWeb feeds
Br J Cancer. 2002 Jul 1; 87(1): 75–80.
Published online 2002 Jul 15. doi:  10.1038/sj.bjc.6600367
PMCID: PMC2364279

High-risk human papillomavirus clearance in pregnant women: trends for lower clearance during pregnancy with a catch-up postpartum


We followed 353 women referred with abnormal cervical cytology in a non-intervention cohort study. In 91 pregnant women we compared high-risk human papilloma virus rates in the subsequent trimesters and postpartum in comparison to 262 non-pregnant women. High-risk human papilloma virus clearance was compared with 179 high-risk human papilloma virus positive non-pregnant women. Our main questions were: (1) do high-risk human papilloma virus rates change during pregnancy?; and (2) is there any difference between high-risk human papilloma virus clearance in pregnant and non-pregnant women? Women were monitored 3–4 monthly by cytology, colposcopy, and high-risk human papilloma virus testing. The median follow-up time was 33 months (range 3–74). Non-pregnant women showed prevalence rates of high-risk human papilloma virus of 64, 57, 53, and 50%, respectively, in four subsequent 3-months periods since the start of the study. These high-risk human papilloma virus rates were higher than in the three trimesters of pregnancy, and during the first 3 months postpartum, i.e. 50, 44, 45, and 31%, respectively. Postpartum only, this difference was statistically significant (P=0.004). Paired comparisons of high-risk human papilloma virus prevalence rates of the different trimesters with the postpartum rate showed (McNemar test) decreased rates: first trimester: 18% (P=0.02), second trimester: 13% (P=0.02) and third trimester: 23% (P<0.005). Such a phenomenon was not found in non-pregnant women. Pregnant women showed a trend for increased high-risk human papilloma virus clearance during the third trimester and postpartum compared to non-pregnant women (hazard ratios 3.3 (0.8–13.7) and 4.6 (1.6–12.8), respectively). These results suggest a lowered immune-response against human papilloma virus during the first two trimesters of pregnancy with a catch-up postpartum.

British Journal of Cancer (2002) 87, 75–80. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6600367 www.bjcancer.com

© 2002 Cancer Research UK

Keywords: human papillomavirus, pregnancy, follow-up study, natural history, prevalence

Several epidemiological and biological studies have established the important role of infection with high-risk types of human papilloma virus (HPV) for development of cervical cancer and its precursor lesions. In women with or without abnormal cervical smears a positive high-risk HPV test result indicates an increased risk for development of high grade cervical lesions (Ho et al, 1995; Remmink et al, 1995; Rozendaal et al, 1996, 2000; Nobbenhuis et al, 1999). Moreover, in nearly all cervical cancers high-risk HPV types have been detected (Walboomers et al, 1999).

The increased prevalence of high grade cervical lesions and cervical cancer in immunocompromised patients, such as AIDS patients and transplant recipients, indicates that persistence of high-risk HPV and consequently HPV-mediated carcinogenesis is related to compromised immunosurveillance (IARC, 1995; Petry et al, 1996; Sun et al, 1997). Pregnancy is believed to alter immune-response in women (Schneider et al, 1987; Sethi et al, 1998). Some authors concluded pregnancy has no effect on CIN (Jain et al, 1997). Others reported high regression rates of cervical dysplasia in the postpartum period (Yost et al, 1999). In contrast, high prevalence rates of high-risk HPV have been found in pregnant women (Rando et al, 1989; Saito et al, 1995; Morrison et al, 1996; Fife et al, 1999), although in other studies no differences in HPV prevalence between pregnant and non-pregnant women were seen (Peng et al, 1990; Kemp et al, 1992; De Roda Husman et al, 1995a). In short, the influence of pregnancy on the natural course of infection with high-risk HPV types is not yet known.

We performed a non-intervention follow-up study in 353 women referred for colposcopy because of abnormal cervical cytology and compared high-risk HPV clearance in pregnant women with that of non-pregnant women. Our main questions were: (1) do high-risk HPV rates change during pregnancy?; and (2) is there any difference between HPV clearance in pregnant and non-pregnant women?



From June 1990 to December 1992, 353 women referred to the colposcopy clinic of the University Hospital Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, were followed in a non-intervention study. The characteristics of this cohort have been described previously (Nobbenhuis et al, 1999, 2001). Briefly, the inclusion criteria were: referral because of an abnormal cervical smear (i.e. mild to severe dyskaryosis); age 18–55 years; no history of cervical pathology, prenatal diethylstilbestrol exposure, or concomitant cancer; no HIV or immunosuppression, and sufficient Dutch or English language skills. The median follow-up time was 33 months (range 3–74). Enrolment into the study (baseline) took place about 2 months after referral.

Ninety-one women were pregnant during follow-up. The first recorded full term pregnancy in each woman was used to computer-high-risk HPV prevalence rates and analyse high-risk HPV clearance. For the analysis of high-risk HPV clearance we excluded four pregnancies ending in abortion and four women who acquired HPV during follow-up prior to their pregnancy. One hundred and seventy-nine non-pregnant women with a positive high-risk HPV test at baseline (Figure 1; group A) and 38 pregnant women with a positive high-risk HPV test at their first visit during pregnancy (Figure 1; groups B and C) were used to study high-risk HPV clearance between pregnant and non-pregnant women.

Figure 1
Characteristics of study groups.

Women were monitored every 3 to 4 months by cytology, colposcopy and HPV testing (Remmink et al, 1995; Nobbenhuis et al, 1999, 2001). Clinicians and laboratory staff were blinded for HPV test results and clinical findings, respectively. No biopsy samples were taken during follow-up to avoid any interference with the natural course of the disease. Follow-up ended if women reached clinical progression (n=33), defined as a colposcopic impression of CIN 3 covering three or more cervical quadrants or a cervical smear suspect for microinvasive carcinoma, or at the end of the study in December 1996. At the last visit, colposcopically directed biopsy samples were taken for histological verification of suspected lesions (=end histology). In women with normal colposcopy, random samples were taken. If necessary, women were treated according to standard protocols.

The study protocol was approved by the ethics review board of the hospital, and all women voluntarily signed informed consent before enrolment.

Human papillomavirus testing

Testing for HPV was done by EIA PCR, which used HPV general-primer-mediated PCR with the general primers GP 5+/6+ to detect a broad spectrum of mucosotropic HPV types (De Roda Husman et al, 1995b; Jacobs et al, 1997). PCR products were used to identify in one assay all 14 high-risk types using EIA (HPV type 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 66 and 68). In addition, individual high-risk HPV types were determined. This test has been described previously and has been clinically validated (Jacobs et al, 1997, 2000).

Definition of HPV clearance

Women were considered to be clear of infection when no high-risk HPV type from the previous visit was detected at the next visit (Nobbenhuis et al, 1999, 2001).

Statistical analysis

We compared pregnant and non-pregnant women in 3 months periods. In non-pregnant women these periods were designated from the start of the study. Age distribution at baseline and at time of pregnancy was compared by the Mann–Whitney test. The Fisher-exact test was used to calculate differences in high-risk HPV rates and abnormal cervical smears in pregnant and non-pregnant women. We also analysed the prevalence of low-risk HPV types and multiple HPV infections at different trimesters but the numbers were too small to draw any conclusions (data not shown).

Not all women were seen in each trimester of pregnancy. Therefore comparisons for cytology and HPV samples between first, second, and third trimester, or postpartum were made by the McNemar test, only for those women with specimens available at both times. Being interested in the effect of pregnancy, only the first postpartum visit within 6 months after delivery was included in the calculation (range 5–25 weeks after pregnancy). The clearance of high-risk HPV in pregnant and non-pregnant women and between pregnancy groups (pregnant at the start of the study versus conceived during the study) were studied by Kaplan–Meier curves during a period of 12 months. For contrasts we used the log-rank test. The time-point of HPV clearance was taken at the mid-point between positive and negative test results for high-risk HPV (Nobbenhuis et al, 1999, 2001). We included 179 non-pregnant women with a high-risk HPV positive test at baseline (Figure 1; group A) and 38 women with a high-risk HPV positive test at their first visit during pregnancy (Figure 1; groups B and C). In pregnant women the baseline starting-point for the analysis was the last menstruation. Cox-regression was performed to calculate the relative risks (Hazard Rates) to clear high-risk HPV in pregnant and non-pregnant women in different time periods. Adjustment was made for women who conceived during follow-up. Throughout all analyses, a value of P<0.05 was considered significant. We did not correct for multiple testing.


The median age in the pregnant and non-pregnant group of women was 30 years (range 20–44 years) and 32 years (range 19–55 years), respectively (P=0.23). At baseline 68% (179 out of 262) of non-pregnant women had a positive high-risk HPV test result compared to 63% (57 out of 91) of pregnant women (P=0.32). At baseline no significant difference in number of abnormal cervical smears was observed in high-risk HPV positive pregnant and non-pregnant women; 133 out of 179 (74%) non-pregnant women still had an abnormal cervical smear compared to 15 out of 25 (60%) pregnant women (P=0.13).

Among pregnant women with cervical smears obtained in the first trimester of pregnancy 39% (21 out of 54 available smears) had abnormal cervical cytology (mild dyskaryosis or worse). Abnormal cytology in the second, and third trimester and postpartum was present in 42% (25 out of 60), 33% (13 out of 39), and 34% (27 out of 79 available smears), respectively. Comparison of paired cervical smear samples among the different trimesters with the postpartum visit did not show any significant difference (P>0.1). In non-pregnant women no significant difference in abnormal cervical smears among the different time periods was found (data not shown).

Prevalence rates of high-risk HPV

In non-pregnant women the prevalence rates of high-risk HPV obtained from the available samples at the different time periods (i.e. 3, 6, 9 and 12 months of follow-up) were 64, 57, 53 and 50%, respectively (Table 1).

Table 1
Prevalence rates of high-risk HPV in pregnant and non-pregnant women at different time points during follow-up

Among pregnant women whose HPV samples were obtained in the first trimester of pregnancy 50% had positive high-risk HPV DNA samples (Table 1). The high-risk HPV prevalence rates in the second and third trimester, and postpartum were 44, 45 and 31%, respectively. Of the remaining 10 women without a postpartum visit, six women wanted to withdraw from the study and had a cervical biopsy during pregnancy, and four women had a follow-up visit more than 6 months postpartum. High-risk HPV positive rates in three monthly periods in the non-pregnant groups were not significantly higher than during pregnancy trimesters and postpartum (Table 1).

Comparison of paired samples of high-risk HPV among the three trimester groups in the pregnant women group did not show any statistical difference (data not shown). In 45 women with paired samples in the first trimester and postpartum a significant decline in high-risk HPV positive tests of 51% (23 out of 45) to 33% (15 out of 45) was found (P=0.02). Comparing second trimester results with postpartum results (paired data available from 53 women) showed a significant decline from 45% (24 out of 53) to 32% (17 out of 53) high-risk HPV positive tests (P=0.02). A significant difference in high-risk HPV rates was also found between the third trimester and postpartum (paired data available from 40 women) from 48% (19 out of 40) to 25% (10 out of 40) (P=0.004).

High-risk HPV clearance

Twenty-five high-risk HPV positive women (66%) were pregnant at baseline (Figure 1; group B) and 13 (34%) became pregnant during follow-up (Figure 1; group C). We used both groups to analyse high-risk HPV clearance. To exclude potential bias for combining these two groups in relation to the starting point we analysed the influence of this heterogeneity. Kaplan–Meier curves did not show differences in clearance rates between the two pregnancy groups or with the non-pregnant reference group (log-rank tests: n.s.). Adjustment for pregnancy groups in Cox regression analysis did not significantly effect the computed relative risks. Moreover, we did not find significant differences between the relative risks in the pregnancy groups. Thus, we did not find any evidence that combining both groups introduces bias.

Among 38 pregnant women with a high-risk HPV positive test at the first visit during pregnancy the cumulative 12-months incidence of high-risk HPV clearance was 42% (95% C.I. 25–59; figure not shown). One hundred and seventy-nine non-pregnant women with a positive high-risk HPV test at baseline had a cumulative 12-months incidence of high-risk HPV clearance of 31% (95% C.I. 24–38; figure not shown). Both clearance curves according to Kaplan–Meier analysis cross at 9 months thus excluding long term effects on prevalence rates. The crude trimester dependent hazard ratio's, and the trimester dependent hazard ratio adjusted for pregnancy groups for HR–HPV clearance (Table 2), show that the differences between the curves are not only related with random variation. At 9 to 12 months of follow-up, i.e. the postpartum period, pregnant women were 4.6 times (95% C.I. 1.6–12.8) more at risk to clear HPV than non-pregnant women followed during the same time since the start of the study. The adjusted hazard ratio's for clearance during the second and third trimester were 0.35 (95% C.I. 0.05–2.6) and 3.3 (95% C.I. 0.8–13.7), respectively. Trends for decreased high-risk HPV clearance in cervical smears in pregnant women in contrast with non-pregnant women are compensated by increased clearance postpartum. The increased clearance probably already starts during the third trimester since the crude hazard ratio was significant during that period. Inclusion of more pregnant women would probably also show a significant adjusted hazard ratio.

Table 2
Relative risks to clear high-risk HPV in pregnant and non-pregnant women at different time periods


Our results show that during pregnancy in a group of women initially referred for colposcopy with an abnormal cervical smear the prevalence of high-risk HPV is higher than in the postpartum period. This effect is also demonstrated by the trimester dependent HPV clearance rates; during the postpartum period women were more at risk to clear high-risk HPV than non-pregnant women.

The high-risk HPV prevalence rates in pregnant women varied between 45 and 50% during the trimesters, and 31% in the postpartum period. Similar figures were found by others. Kemp et al (1992) found HPV prevalence rates of up to 42% and Fife et al (1999) up to 36% during pregnancy. However, most of these women had normal cervical cytology smears and were performed in a pregnant population of young women with a high incidence of sexual transmitted diseases.

Using a variety of HPV detection techniques, several other studies also have found a significantly higher prevalence of high-risk HPV during pregnancy in comparison with the postpartum period (Rando et al, 1989; Saito et al, 1995; Fife et al, 1999; Yost et al, 1999). Several reasons for this phenomenon have been postulated. It has been suggested that pregnant women tend to have fewer sexual partners than non-pregnant women of the same age (De Roda Husman et al, 1995a) and therefore have a decreased risk to acquire a new HPV infection (Peng et al, 1990; Tenti et al, 1997). Pregnancy-related explanations for this change in HPV prevalence have been given in terms of possible selective activation of viruses by hormonal (von Knebel Doeberitz et al, 1991; Michelin et al, 1997) and immunological factors (Sethi et al, 1998). Sethi et al (1998) showed that serologic response to HPV type 16 was higher in non-pregnant than in pregnant women suggesting that pregnancy reduces humoral immune response against HPV. In pregnant women we found reduced high-risk HPV clearance during pregnancy with a catch-up postpartum, suggesting that an altered immune-response may be present during pregnancy. Unfortunately, we could not test this since in only a few women blood serum was taken during follow-up. Our study shows that postpartum pregnant women clear HR–HPV faster than non-pregnant women after a same period of follow-up. This downward trend in high-risk HPV prevalence postpartum may be explained by cervical trauma occurring at the time of delivery with additional repair of the cervical epithelium (Yost et al, 1999). Indeed, in a study in which postpartum regression rates of cervical lesions were compared in women who delivered vaginally or by caesarean section, a higher postpartum regression was seen in women with vaginal deliveries probably due to stimulation of local immune factors (Ahdoot et al, 1998).

From recent studies we know that HPV clearance is associated with and precedes on average 3 months regression of cervical lesions (Nobbenhuis et al, 2001; Zielinski et al, 2001). Thus, following clearance an increased regression rate of cervical lesions could be expected postpartum. This phenomenon was already described by Yost et al (1999). However, during a 12-month period they found no difference in clearance rates between pregnant and non-pregnant women. These results indicate that pregnant women with a high-risk HPV positive test during pregnancy are not at higher risk for progression of underlying lesions than non-pregnant women. Indeed, when we followed our women for an additional 6 months period the cumulative incidence of HPV clearance in pregnant and non-pregnant women became similar (data not shown). In addition, no difference in number of women with progressive CIN was seen in the follow-up of pregnant and non-pregnant women with high-risk HPV positive tests, suggesting that both groups are at similar risks over a period of 1½ years (data not shown).

In conclusion, although at long term the course of a high-risk HPV infection is not affected we found evidence that pregnancy influences high-risk HPV clearance. Trends for a decreased high-risk HPV clearance in the first two trimesters in pregnant women in contrast with non-pregnant women are compensated by increased clearance demonstrable postpartum but already starting in the third trimester.


This study was supported by grants from the Dutch Prevention Fund/Zorg Onderzoek Nederland (28-1502 and 28-2089).


  • Ahdoot D, Van Nostrand KM, Nguyen NJ, Tewari DS, Kurasaki T, DiSaia PJ, Rose GS. The effect of route of delivery on regression of abnormal cytologic findings in the postpartum period. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;178:1116–1120. [PubMed]
  • De Roda Husman AM, Walboomers JMM, Hopman E, Bleker OP, Helmerhorst ThJM, Rozendaal L, Voorhorst FJ, Meijer CJLM. HPV prevalence in cytomorphologically normal cervical scrapes of pregnant women as determined by PCR: the age-related pattern. J Med Vir. 1995a;46:97–102. [PubMed]
  • De Roda Husman AM, Walboomers JMM, van den Brule AJC, Meijer CJLM, Snijders PJF. The use of general primers GP5 and GP6 elongated at their 3′ ends with adjacent highly conserved sequences improves human papillomavirus detection by PCR. J Gen Vir. 1995b;76:1057–1062. [PubMed]
  • Fife KH, Katz BP, Brizendine EJ, Brown DR. Cervical human papillomavirus deoxyribonucleic acid persists throughout pregnancy and decreases in the postpartum period. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180:1110–1114. [PubMed]
  • Ho GYF, Burk RD, Klein S, Kadish AS, Chang CJ, Palan P, Basu J, Tachezy R, Lewis R, Romney S. Persistent genital human papillomavirus infection as a risk factor for persistent cervical dysplasia. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995;87:1365–1371. [PubMed]
  • IARC Monographs on the evaluation of the carcinogenic risks to human. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; The Human Papillomavirus. 1995;Vol 64
  • Jacobs MV, van den Brule AJC, Snijders PJF, Meijer CJLM, Helmerhorst ThJM, Walboomers JMM. A general primer GP5+/6+ mediated PCR-EIA for rapid detection of high- and low-risk HPV DNA in cervical scrapes. J Clin Microbiol. 1997;35:791–795. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Jacobs MV, Zielinski D, Meijer CJLM, Poll RP, Voorhorst FJ, de Schipper FA, Meijer CJLM, Walboomers JMM. A simplified and reliable HPV testing of archival Papanicolaou-stained cervical smears: application to cervical smears from cancer patients starting with cytologically normal smears. Br J Cancer. 2000;82:1421–1426. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Jain AG, Higgins RV, Boyle MJ. Management of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;177:298–302. [PubMed]
  • Kemp EA, Hakenewerth AM, Laurent SL, Gravitt PE, Stoerker J. Human papillomavirus prevalence in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1992;79:649–656. [PubMed]
  • Michelin D, Gissmann L, Street D, Potkul RK, Fisher S, Kaufmann AM, Qiao L, Schreckenberger C. Regulation of human papillomavirus type 18 in vivo: effect of estrogen and progesterone in transgenic mice. Gynecol Oncol. 1997;66:202–208. [PubMed]
  • Morrison EAB, Gammon MD, Goldberg GL, Vermund SH, Burk RD. Pregnancy and cervical infection with human papillomaviruses. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 1996;54:125–130. [PubMed]
  • Nobbenhuis MAE, Walboomers JMM, Helmerhorst ThJM, Rozendaal L, Remmink AJ, Risse EKJ, van der Linden HC, Voorhorst FJ, Kenemans P, Meijer CJLM. Relation of human papillomavirus status to cervical lesions and consequences for cervical-cancer screening: a prospective study. Lancet. 1999;354:20–25. [PubMed]
  • Nobbenhuis MAE, Helmerhorst ThJM, van den Brule AJC, Rozendaal L, Voorhorst FJ, Bezemer PD, Verheijen RHM, Meijer CJLM. Cytological regression and clearance of high-risk human papillomavirus in women with an abnormal cervical smear. Lancet. 2001;358:1782–1783. [PubMed]
  • Rando RF, Lindheim S, Hasty L, Sedlaeck TV, Woodland M, Eder C. Increased frequency of detection of human papillomavirus deoxyribonucleic acid in exfoliated cells during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;161:50–55. [PubMed]
  • Remmink AJ, Walboomers JMM, Helmerhorst ThJM, Voorhorst FJ, Rozendaal L, Risse EKJ, Meijer CJLM, Kenemans P. The presence of persistent high-risk HPV genotypes in dysplastic cervical lesions is associated with progressive disease: natural history up to 36 months. Int J Cancer. 1995;61:306–311. [PubMed]
  • Rozendaal L, Walboomers JMM, van der Linden JC, Voorhorst FJ, Kenemans P, Helmerhorst ThJM, van Ballegooijen M, Meijer CJ. PCR based high risk HPV test in cervical cancer screening gives objective risk assessment of women with cytomorphologically normal cervical smears. Int J Cancer. 1996;68:766–769. [PubMed]
  • Rozendaal L, Westerga J, van der Linden JC, Walboomers JMM, Voorhorst FJ, Risse EKJ, Boon ME, Meijer CJ. PCR based high risk HPV testing is superior to neural network based screening for predicting incident CIN III in women with normal cytology and borderline changes. Int J Cancer. 2000;53:606–611. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Peng TC, Searle CP, Shah KV, Repke JT, Johnson TRB. Prevalence of human papillomavirus infections in term pregnancy. Am J Perinat. 1990;7:189–192. [PubMed]
  • Petry KU, Kochel H, Bode U, Schedel L, Niesert S, Glaubitz M, Maschek H, Kuhnle H. Human papillomavirus is associated with the frequent detection of warty and basaloid high-grade neoplasia of the vulva and cervical neoplasia among immunocompromised women. Gynecol Oncol. 1996;60:30–34. [PubMed]
  • Saito J, Sumiyoshi H, Nakatani H, Ikeda M, Hoshiai H, Noda K. Dysplasia and HPV infection initially detected by DNA analysis in cytomorphologically normal cervical smears. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 1995;51:43–48. [PubMed]
  • Schneider A, Hotz M, Gissmann L. Increased prevalence of human papillomaviruses in the lower genital tract of pregnant women. Int J Cancer. 1987;40:198–201. [PubMed]
  • Sethi S, Müller M, Schneider A, Blettner M, Smith E, Turek L, Wahrendorf J, Gissmann L, Chang-Claude J. Serologic response to the E4, E6, and E7 proteins of human papillomavirus type 16 in pregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;178:360–364. [PubMed]
  • Sun XW, Kuhn L, Ellerbrock TV, Chiasson MA, Bush TJ, Wright TC. Human papillomavirus infection in women infected with the human immunodeficiency virus. N Engl Med J. 1997;337:1343–1349. [PubMed]
  • Tenti P, Zappatore R, Migliora P, Spinillo A, Maccarini U, De Benedittis M, Vesentini N, Marchitelli G, Silini E, Carnevali L. Latent human papillomavirus infection in pregnant women at term: a case-control study. J Infect Dis. 1997;176:277–280. [PubMed]
  • von Knebel Doeberitz M, Bauknecht T, Bartsch D, Zur Hausen H. Influence of chromosomal integration on glucocorticoid-regulated transcription of growth-stimulating papillomavirus genes E6 and E7 in cervical carcinoma cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1991;88:1411–1415. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Walboomers JMM, Jacobs MV, Manos MM, Bosch FX, Kummer A, Shah KV, Snijders PJF, Meijer CJLM, Muñoz N. Human papillomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer worldwide. J Pathol. 1999;189:12–19. [PubMed]
  • Yost NP, Santoso JT, McIntere DD, Iliya FA. Postpartum regression rates of antepartum cervical intraepithelial neoplasia II and III lesions. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;93:359–362. [PubMed]
  • Zielinski GD, Snijders PJF, Rozendaal L, Voorhorst FJ, Runsink AP, de Schipper FA, Meijer CJLM. High-risk HPV testing in women with borderline and mild dyskaryosis: long term follow-up data and clinical relevance. J Pathol. 2001;195:300–306. [PubMed]

Articles from British Journal of Cancer are provided here courtesy of Cancer Research UK
PubReader format: click here to try


Save items

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...


  • Compound
    PubChem chemical compound records that cite the current articles. These references are taken from those provided on submitted PubChem chemical substance records. Multiple substance records may contribute to the PubChem compound record.
  • MedGen
    Related information in MedGen
  • PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles
  • Substance
    PubChem chemical substance records that cite the current articles. These references are taken from those provided on submitted PubChem chemical substance records.
  • Taxonomy
    Taxonomy records associated with the current articles through taxonomic information on related molecular database records (Nucleotide, Protein, Gene, SNP, Structure).
  • Taxonomy Tree
    Taxonomy Tree

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...