pmc logo image
Logo of brjcancerBJC HomepageBJC Advance online publicationBJC Current IssueSubmitting an article to BJCWeb feeds

Formats:

Br J Cancer. 2000 January; 82(2): 263–269.
Published online 2000 January 18. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.1999.0913.
PMCID: PMC2363272
Quality of life and home enteral tube feeding: a French prospective study in patients with head and neck or oesophageal cancer
C Roberge,1 M Tran,2 C Massoud,2 B Poirée,2 N Duval,2 E Damecour,2 D Frout,3 D Malvy,4 F Joly,1 P Lebailly,1 and M Henry-Amar11
1Service de Recherche Clinique, Centre François Baclesse, Route de Lion-sur-Mer, Caen cedex 5, 14076, France
2Service Diététique, Centre François Baclesse, Route de Lion-sur-Mer, Caen cedex 5, 14076, France
3Service de Chirurgie ORL, Centre François Baclesse, Route de Lion-sur-Mer, Caen cedex 5, 14076, France
4Institut de Santé Publique, Centre René Labusquière, Bordeaux, France
Received August 27, 1998; Revised July 20, 1999; Accepted August 2, 1999.
Abstract
A prospective study was conducted to evaluate the impact of home enteral tube feeding on quality of life in 39 consecutive patients treated for head and neck or oesophageal cancer at the Centre François Baclesse in Caen, France. Patients were taken as their own controls. Quality of life was evaluated using the EORTC QLQ-C30 core questionnaire, and the EORTC H&N35 and OES24 specific questionnaires. The feeding technique tolerance was evaluated using a questionnaire specifically developed for this study. Two evaluations were made, the first a week after hospital discharge (n = 39) and the second 3 weeks later (n = 30). Overall, the global health status/quality of life scale score slightly improved; among symptoms, scale scores that significantly improved (P< 0.05) concerned constipation, coughing, social functioning and body image/sexuality. The physical feeding technique tolerance was acceptable while the technique was psychologically less tolerated with two-thirds of the patients longing to have the tube removed. Onethird of the patients was also uncomfortable about their body image. Home enteral tube feeding was responsible for not visiting family or close relations in 15% of patients, and not going out in public in 23%. We conclude that home enteral tube feeding is a physically well accepted technique although a substantial proportion of patients may experience psychosocial distress. © 2000 Cancer Research Campaign
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (83K).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ, Filiberti A, Flechtner H, Fleishman SB, de Haes JC, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Mar 3;85(5):365–376. [PubMed]
  • Barber MD, Fearon KC, Delmore G, Loprinzi CL. Should cancer patients with incurable disease receive parenteral or enteral nutritional support? Eur J Cancer. 1998 Feb;34(3):279–285. [PubMed]
  • Beeken L, Calman F. A return to "normal eating" after curative treatment for oral cancer. What are the long-term prospects? Eur J Cancer B Oral Oncol. 1994 Nov;30B(6):387–392. [PubMed]
  • Bjordal K, Hammerlid E, Ahlner-Elmqvist M, de Graeff A, Boysen M, Evensen JF, Biörklund A, de Leeuw JR, Fayers PM, Jannert M, Westin T, Kaasa S. Quality of life in head and neck cancer patients: validation of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-H&N35. J Clin Oncol. 1999 Mar;17(3):1008–1019. [PubMed]
  • Blazeby JM, Alderson D, Winstone K, Steyn R, Hammerlid E, Arraras J, Farndon JR. Development of an EORTC questionnaire module to be used in quality of life assessment for patients with oesophageal cancer. The EORTC Quality of Life Study Group. Eur J Cancer. 1996 Oct;32A(11):1912–1917. [PubMed]
  • Boyd KJ, Beeken L. Tube feeding in palliative care: benefits and problems. Palliat Med. 1994;8(2):156–158. [PubMed]
  • Bozzetti F. Is enteral nutrition a primary therapy in cancer patients? Gut. 1994 Jan;35(1 Suppl):S65–S68. [PubMed]
  • Bruning PF, Halling A, Hilgers FJ, Kappner G, Poelhuis EK, Kobashi-Schoot AM, Schouwenburg PF. Postoperative nasogastric tube feeding in patients with head and neck cancer: a prospective assessment of nutritional status and well-being. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1988 Feb;24(2):181–188. [PubMed]
  • Campos AC, Butters M, Meguid MM. Home enteral nutrition via gastrostomy in advanced head and neck cancer patients. Head Neck. 1990 Mar–Apr;12(2):137–142. [PubMed]
  • Chaturvedi SK, Shenoy A, Prasad KM, Senthilnathan SM, Premlatha BS. Concerns, coping and quality of life in head and neck cancer patients. Support Care Cancer. 1996 May;4(3):186–190. [PubMed]
  • Coben RM, Weintraub A, DiMarino AJ, Jr, Cohen S. Gastroesophageal reflux during gastrostomy feeding. Gastroenterology. 1994 Jan;106(1):13–18. [PubMed]
  • Detsky AS, McLaughlin JR, Abrams HB, Whittaker JS, Whitwell J, L'Abbé K, Jeejeebhoy KN. A cost-utility analysis of the home parenteral nutrition program at Toronto General Hospital: 1970-1982. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1986 Jan–Feb;10(1):49–57. [PubMed]
  • Dewys WD, Begg C, Lavin PT, Band PR, Bennett JM, Bertino JR, Cohen MH, Douglass HO, Jr, Engstrom PF, Ezdinli EZ, Horton J, Johnson GJ, Moertel CG, Oken MM, Perlia C, Rosenbaum C, Silverstein MN, Skeel RT, Sponzo RW, Tormey DC. Prognostic effect of weight loss prior to chemotherapy in cancer patients. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Med. 1980 Oct;69(4):491–497. [PubMed]
  • Elia M. Home enteral nutrition: general aspects and a comparison between the United States and Britain. Nutrition. 1994 Mar–Apr;10(2):115–123. [PubMed]
  • Elia M. An international perspective on artificial nutritional support in the community. Lancet. 1995 May 27;345(8961):1345–1349. [PubMed]
  • Grindel CG, Whitmer K, Barsevick A. Quality of life and nutritional support in patients with cancer. Cancer Pract. 1996 Mar–Apr;4(2):81–87. [PubMed]
  • Guyatt GH, Feeny DH, Patrick DL. Measuring health-related quality of life. Ann Intern Med. 1993 Apr 15;118(8):622–629. [PubMed]
  • Holden CE, Puntis JW, Charlton CP, Booth IW. Nasogastric feeding at home: acceptability and safety. Arch Dis Child. 1991 Jan;66(1):148–151. [PubMed]
  • Howard L. Home parenteral and enteral nutrition in cancer patients. Cancer. 1993 Dec 1;72(11 Suppl):3531–3541. [PubMed]
  • Howard L, Ament M, Fleming CR, Shike M, Steiger E. Current use and clinical outcome of home parenteral and enteral nutrition therapies in the United States. Gastroenterology. 1995 Aug;109(2):355–365. [PubMed]
  • Launois R. La prise en compte des préférences des patients dans les choix de santé individuels et collectifs. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 1994;42(3):246–262. [PubMed]
  • Lees J. Nasogastric and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding in head and neck cancer patients receiving radiotherapy treatment at a regional oncology unit: a two year study. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 1997 Mar;6(1):45–49. [PubMed]
  • Lipman TO. Clinical trials of nutritional support in cancer. Parenteral and enteral therapy. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 1991 Feb;5(1):91–102. [PubMed]
  • List MA, Mumby P, Haraf D, Siston A, Mick R, MacCracken E, Vokes E. Performance and quality of life outcome in patients completing concomitant chemoradiotherapy protocols for head and neck cancer. Qual Life Res. 1997 Apr;6(3):274–284. [PubMed]
  • Lopez MJ, Robinson P, Madden T, Highbarger T. Nutritional support and prognosis in patients with head and neck cancer. J Surg Oncol. 1994 Jan;55(1):33–36. [PubMed]
  • Malone M. Quality of life of patients receiving home parenteral or enteral nutrition support. Pharmacoeconomics. 1994 Feb;5(2):101–108. [PubMed]
  • Michaelis CA, Warzak WJ, Stanek K, Van Riper C. Parental and professional perceptions of problems associated with long-term pediatric home tube feeding. J Am Diet Assoc. 1992 Oct;92(10):1235–1238. [PubMed]
  • Osoba D. Lessons learned from measuring health-related quality of life in oncology. J Clin Oncol. 1994 Mar;12(3):608–616. [PubMed]
  • Padilla GV, Grant MM. Psychosocial aspects of artificial feeding. Cancer. 1985 Jan 1;55(1 Suppl):301–304. [PubMed]
  • Padilla GV, Grant M, Wong H, Hansen BW, Hanson RL, Bergstrom N, Kubo WR. Subjective distresses of nasogastric tube feeding. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1979 Mar–Apr;3(2):53–57. [PubMed]
  • Patrick DL, Deyo RA. Generic and disease-specific measures in assessing health status and quality of life. Med Care. 1989 Mar;27(3 Suppl):S217–S232. [PubMed]
  • Perl M, Hall RC, Dudrick SJ, Englert DM, Stickney SK, Gardner ER. Psychological aspects of long-term home hyperalimentation. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1980 Nov–Dec;4(6):554–560. [PubMed]
  • Peteet JR, Medeiros C, Slavin L, Walsh-Burke K. Psychological aspects of artificial feeding in cancer patients. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1981 Mar–Apr;5(2):138–140. [PubMed]
  • Rains BL. The non-hospitalized tube-fed patient. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1981 Spring;8(2):8–13. [PubMed]
  • Sami H, Saint-Aubert B, Szawlowski AW, Astre C, Joyeux H. Home enteral nutrition system: one patient, one daily ration of an "all-in-one" sterile and modular formula in a single container. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1990 Mar–Apr;14(2):173–176. [PubMed]
  • Shike M. Nutrition therapy for the cancer patient. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 1996 Feb;10(1):221–234. [PubMed]
  • Souba WW. Nutritional support. N Engl J Med. 1997 Jan 2;336(1):41–48. [PubMed]
  • Srp F, Steiger E, Gulledge AD, Matarese LE, Paysinger J, Roncagli T, Stebbins J, Sullivan M. Psychosocial issues of nutritional support. A multidisciplinary interpretation. Nurs Clin North Am. 1989 Jun;24(2):447–459. [PubMed]
  • Vigano A, Watanabe S, Bruera E. Anorexia and cachexia in advanced cancer patients. Cancer Surv. 1994;21:99–115. [PubMed]