• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of brjcancerBJC HomepageBJC Advance online publicationBJC Current IssueSubmitting an article to BJCWeb feeds
Br J Cancer. Mar 1999; 79(7-8): 1227–1233.
PMCID: PMC2362235

Follow-up of breast cancer in primary care vs specialist care: results of an economic evaluation

Abstract

A randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing primary-care-centred follow-up of breast cancer patients with the current standard practice of specialist-centred follow-up showed no increase in delay in diagnosing recurrence, and no increase in anxiety or deterioration in health-related quality of life. An economic evaluation of the two schemes of follow-up was conducted concurrent with the RCT. Because the RCT found no difference in the primary clinical outcomes, a cost minimization analysis was conducted. Process measures of the quality of care such as frequency and length of visits were superior in primary care. Costs to patients and to the health service were lower in primary care. There was no difference in total costs of diagnostic tests, with particular tests being performed more frequently in primary care than in specialist care. Data are provided on the average frequency and length of visits, and frequency of diagnostic testing for breast cancer patients during the follow-up period. © 1999 Cancer Research Campaign

Keywords: breast cancer, economic evaluation, follow-up care, randomized controlled trial, primary care

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (91K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Clark PB, Morris DL. Management of patients after mastectomy. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1981 Jun 27;282(6282):2095–2096. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Dewar J. Follow up in breast cancer. BMJ. 1995 Mar 18;310(6981):685–686. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Donegan WL. Follow-up after treatment for breast cancer: how much is too much? J Surg Oncol. 1995 Aug;59(4):211–214. [PubMed]
  • Drummond MF, Davies L. Economic analysis alongside clinical trials. Revisiting the methodological issues. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1991;7(4):561–573. [PubMed]
  • Drummond MF, Jefferson TO. Guidelines for authors and peer reviewers of economic submissions to the BMJ. The BMJ Economic Evaluation Working Party. BMJ. 1996 Aug 3;313(7052):275–283. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Grunfeld E, Mant D, Yudkin P, Adewuyi-Dalton R, Cole D, Stewart J, Fitzpatrick R, Vessey M. Routine follow up of breast cancer in primary care: randomised trial. BMJ. 1996 Sep 14;313(7058):665–669. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Hughes LE, Courtney SP. Follow up of patients with breast cancer. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1985 Apr 27;290(6477):1229–1230. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Loprinzi CL. Follow-up testing for curatively treated cancer survivors. What to do? JAMA. 1995 Jun 21;273(23):1877–1878. [PubMed]
  • Robinson R. Costs and cost-minimisation analysis. BMJ. 1993 Sep 18;307(6906):726–728. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Rosselli Del Turco M, Palli D, Cariddi A, Ciatto S, Pacini P, Distante V. Intensive diagnostic follow-up after treatment of primary breast cancer. A randomized trial. National Research Council Project on Breast Cancer follow-up. JAMA. 1994 May 25;271(20):1593–1597. [PubMed]
  • Schapira DV. Breast cancer surveillance--a cost-effective strategy. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1993;25(2):107–111. [PubMed]
  • Strayer F, Kisker CT, Fethke C. Cost-effectiveness of a shared-management delivery system for the care of children with cancer. Pediatrics. 1980 Dec;66(6):907–911. [PubMed]
  • Virgo KS, Vernava AM, Longo WE, McKirgan LW, Johnson FE. Cost of patient follow-up after potentially curative colorectal cancer treatment. JAMA. 1995 Jun 21;273(23):1837–1841. [PubMed]
  • Wilson A. Consultation length in general practice: a review. Br J Gen Pract. 1991 Mar;41(344):119–122. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from British Journal of Cancer are provided here courtesy of Cancer Research UK

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

  • Cited in Books
    Cited in Books
    PubMed Central articles cited in books
  • MedGen
    MedGen
    Related information in MedGen
  • PubMed
    PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...