Logo of plosonePLoS OneView this ArticleSubmit to PLoSGet E-mail AlertsContact UsPublic Library of Science (PLoS)
PLoS ONE. 2008; 3(5): e2080.
Published online 2008 May 7. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0002080
PMCID: PMC2358977

SalK/SalR, a Two-Component Signal Transduction System, Is Essential for Full Virulence of Highly Invasive Streptococcus suis Serotype 2

Dagmar Beier, Editor



Streptococcus suis serotype 2 (S. suis 2, SS2) has evolved into a highly infectious entity, which caused the two recent large-scale outbreaks of human SS2 epidemic in China, and is characterized by a toxic shock-like syndrome. However, the molecular pathogenesis of this new emerging pathogen is still poorly understood.

Methodology/Principal Findings

89K is a newly predicted pathogenicity island (PAI) which is specific to Chinese epidemic strains isolated from these two SS2 outbreaks. Further bioinformatics analysis revealed a unique two-component signal transduction system (TCSTS) located in the candidate 89K PAI, which is orthologous to the SalK/SalR regulatory system of Streptococcus salivarius. Knockout of salKR eliminated the lethality of SS2 in experimental infection of piglets. Functional complementation of salKR into the isogenic mutant ΔsalKR restored its soaring pathogenicity. Colonization experiments showed that the ΔsalKR mutant could not colonize any susceptible tissue of piglets when administered alone. Bactericidal assays demonstrated that resistance of the mutant to polymorphonuclear leukocyte (PMN)-mediated killing was greatly decreased. Expression microarray analysis exhibited a transcription profile alteration of 26 various genes down-regulated in the ΔsalKR mutant.


These findings suggest that SalK/SalR is requisite for the full virulence of ethnic Chinese isolates of highly pathogenic SS2, thus providing experimental evidence for the validity of this bioinformatically predicted PAI.


Streptococcus suis (S. suis) is considered an important zoonotic pathogen causing a variety of life-threatening infections that include meningitis, arthritis, septicaemia and even sudden death in pigs and humans [1], [2]. Among the known 35 serotypes [1], [2], S. suis serotype 2 (S. suis 2 or SS2) is the most virulent and the most frequently isolated serotype. It was previously thought that SS2 caused only sporadic cases of meningitis and sepsis in humans [1], [2]. However, two major emerging infectious disease outbreaks of SS2 in China (one in Jiangsu Province, 1998, and the other in Sichuan Province, 2005), raised considerable international concerns among the public health professionals [3], [4]. A key feature of these two Chinese outbreaks is the prevalence of a toxic shock-like syndrome manifesting itself as acute high fever, multiple organ failures, short course of disease and high lethality [5]. Despite the growing significance of such infections, little is known about the factors that govern the physiological responses of this emerging organism, especially the genetic repertoire that the streptococcus employs to cause the toxic shock-like syndrome.

To shed light on the mystery of high virulence of the epidemic outbreak strains of SS2, our joint research group completed a comprehensive study of comparative genomics, decoding the whole genome sequences of two virulent SS2 strains (98HAH12 and 05ZYH33) isolated from Chinese infected patients [6]. A candidate pathogenicity island (PAI) called 89K was predicted, which is only present in the epidemic strains in these two SS2 outbtreaks but not in other domestic clinical isolates or international virulent strains [6]. However, this bioinformatically predicted candidate PAI needs experimental validation and its linkage to SS2-related high pathogenicity remains unknown. As a subgroup of genomic islands (GIs), PAI usually contains some distinct genetic elements acquired by horizontal gene transfer [7], [8]. A wide range of molecular machineries such as quorum sensing, TCSTS, and ABC transporters, are often involved in a putative PAI, whereby the PAI responds to environmental signals and fulfills its critical functions contributing to the virulence in pathogens[8][10]. Further bioinformatics analysis of the 89K island revealed a distinct two-component signal transduction system (TCSTS) encoded therein appears to be orthologous to the SalK/SalR system of S. salivarius, a salivaricin regulated TCSTS [11]. TCSTS, composed of a membrane sensor (histidine kinase, HK) and a cytoplasmic response regulator (RR), is an important mechanism used by bacteria to adapt to and survive in the changing environments. In pathogens, various members of TCSTSs have been shown to play critical roles in both metabolism and pathogenesis [12][23]. Up until now, only one orphan response regulator, RevS, has been found to be implicated in the pathogenesis of SS2 [24].

To date, SalK/SalR is still a little-reported TCSTS in the fast-growing field of bacterial pathogenesis. In the present study, we attempted to generate the deletion mutant of salKR and assess the contribution of this TCSTS to the high pathogenicity of Chinese SS2 strains. Virulence assays together with a series of experiments enabled us to identify a novel genetic determinant which is required for the overall virulence of Chinese isolates of highly pathogenic SS2.


Discovery and Characterization of SalK/SalR

The newly decoded genomic sequence of S. suis 05ZYH33 makes it possible to systematically investigate the genetic basis of streptococcal pathogenicity. We focused on the putative 89K PAI to perform further molecular analysis. On the negative strand of 89K, peptides encoded by 05SSU0944 and 05SSU0943 exhibit 27% and 41% amino acid sequence identity with the SalK and the SalR proteins of Streptococcus salivarius, respectively, forming a TCSTS belonging to the Nar/LuxR family. 05SSU0944 and 05SSU0943 were accordingly renamed salK and salR (Fig. 1). Notably, the average GC content of salKR, 29.9%, is much less than that of both 89K and the whole genome of 05ZYH33 (36.8% and 41.1%, respectively) (Fig. 1B). The results of bioinformatics analysis indicated that the response regulator, SalR, contains 199 amino acids (aa) with the three N-terminal invariant aa residues (D30, D54 and K107) of the receiver domain of response regulators from Gram-positive bacteria [25]. In the C-terminal domain, it contains two residues (E142, G152) that are absolutely conserved in the winged helix-turn-helix DNA-binding domains of response regulators belonging to the LuxR family [26]. salK encodes a 396 aa long protein, with five N-terminal transmembrane domains and a transmitter domain signature motif in the C-terminal - typical of sensor histidine protein kinases of TCSTSs [25].

Figure 1
Identification and characterization of a unique two-component regulatory system SalK/SalR in the putative 89K PAI.

As some TCSTS gene pairs are adjacent to the genes that they control, the genetic structure of the salKR locus and its flanking genes was defined (Fig. 2A). The salK coding region overlaps that of salR by 20 base pairs (bp), and no putative promoter or transcriptional terminator could be identified within either gene. A putative promoter located approximately 50 bp upstream from the TTG initiation codon of salK, was predicted using the online server of Neutral Network Promoter Prediction. Further sequence analysis revealed a palindrome of 55 bp with the potential to form a stem-loop structure situated in the intergenic region between salR and 05SSU0942, which may function as a transcriptional terminator. 05SSU0945, situated upstream (729 bp long intergenic region) of the salKR locus, encodes a 94 aa polypeptide for which there were no significant database matches. Downstream of salKR, the 05SSU0942, 05SSU0941, 05SSU0940, 05SSU0939, 05SSU0938 genes were predicted to encode peptides with significant identities to the orthologues of Streptococcus agalactiae. The function of these downstream gene products are unknown except for 05SSU0941, which encodes a predicted DNA primase that might be involed in DNA replication. The genetic organization of this locus indicates that salK might be cotranscribed with salR initiating from the PsalK promoter.

Figure 2
Transcriptional analysis of the salKR locus and its flanking genes of S. suis 05ZYH33.

Transcriptional Analysis of the salKR Locus and its Flanking Sequences

To confirm the predicted transcripts of salKR and the flanking genes, RNA extracted from S. suis 05ZYH33 cells was subjected to RT-PCR analysis by using primers amplifying each intergenic region of salKR and the flanking genes. As shown in Fig. 2B, RT-PCR products were obtained with five pairs of the primers (P3/P4, P5/P6, P7/P8, P9/P10 and P13/P14), but not with the other three primer pairs (P1/P2, P11/P12 and P15/P16). On the other hand, when genomic DNA was used as a template, all these primer pairs yielded the expected PCR products (Fig. 2B, PCR). These results suggested that salK and salR are transcriptionally coupled, and the five downstream (05SSU0942-05SSU0938) genes are co-transcribed from a promoter positioned immediately upstream of 05SSU0942 and that their transcription ends between the 05SSU0938-05SSU0937 intergenic region which contains a terminator-like inverted repeat sequence.

Construction of ΔsalKR

To test the role of SalK/SalR in the pathogenesis of SS2, we constructed a homologous suicide plasmid, pUC::salKR with a SpcR cassette (Fig. 3A), and electrotransformed the competent cells of 05ZYH33. Positive transformants were first screened on THB agar plates under the selective pressure of spectinomycin. Colony PCR-based assays were performed to detect whether salKR was still present in the genome or not. One candidate mutant in which salKR failed to be amplified was obtained. To check this suspected mutant, Southern hybridization analyses were employed using probes of SpcR gene, an internal fragment of salKR, and pUC18, respectively. In wild type strain 05ZYH33, the internal fragment of salKR probe hybridized with a single 4.0 kb Cla I fragment (Fig. 3C, lane 1), whereas the SpcR and pUC18 probes did not hybridized with the genomic DNA (Fig. 3B and 3D, lane 1). In the suspected mutant, a 3.6 kb restriction fragment hybridized with the SpcR probe (Fig. 3B, lane 2), while no hybridization signal was detected when the internal fragment of salKR and pUC18 served as the probes (Fig. 3C and 3D, lane 2). In a single cross-over mutant which was set as the reference, both the SpcR and pUC18 probe hybridized with a 6.1 kb Cla I restriction fragment (Fig. 3B and 3D, lane 3), and the salKR probe hybridized with a 4.0 kb fragment (Fig. 3C, lane 3), indicating that this strain had pUC::salKR integrated into its chromosome by a single cross-over event at the 3′-flanking region of the salKR genes (Fig. 3A, III). Additionally, the allelic replacement of the wild-type salKR genes by the SpcR cassette in the suspected mutant was also confirmed by multiple-PCR analysis and sequencing with primers specific to genomic regions lying out the homologous left and right arms (Fig. 3A and 3E). All these results demonstrate that an isogenic knockout mutant of salKR (namely ΔsalKR) was successfully constructed. RT-PCR experiments later also showed that neither salK nor salR could be transcribed in ΔsalKR (data not shown), which further confirmed that salKR had been deleted from the bacterial chromosome.

Figure 3
Construction and confirmation analysis of the knockout mutant strain ΔsalKR.

Role of SalK/SalR in Virulence

Given the multiple roles of TCSTS in bacteria, we evaluated the effect of salKR deletion on the general biological characteristics of SS2 prior to in vivo work. First, the ability of the mutant strain to retain spectinomycin resistance was assessed. The spectinomycin resistance phenotype was stable in ΔsalKR during in vitro culture (data not shown). Next, the growth kinetics curves of ΔsalKR were compared with that of WT, and no obvious distinctions were observed. When streaked on THB plates with 5% sheep blood, ΔsalKR and WT colonies displayed a similar haemolytic phenotype. Finally, cell morphology and ultrastructure of these two strains were examined under light microscope and transmission electron microscope respectively, however, no significant differences were found (Fig. 4).

Figure 4
Cell morphology and ultrastructure of S. suis wild type strain 05ZYH33 and mutant strain ΔsalKR.

An experimental infection model in piglets was designed to assess the role of SalK/SalR in virulence. As shown in Figure 5, all six SPF-piglets inoculated intravenously with WT developed most of the typical disease symptoms, including high fever, limping, swollen joints, shivering, CNS failure and respiratory failure within 24 hrs. Five of them died on day 2 post-infection, and the last one on day 3. In contrast, six infected piglets with an avirulent strain, 05HAS68 (as negative control), survived nearly without any obvious symptoms until the end of the experiment (14 days after infection). Wherein the six piglets challenged with the ΔsalKR mutant were all alive and symptom-free during the entire course monitored. This was similar to those observed in the negative control group, indicating that ΔsalKR totally loses its lethality. The experiments of functional complementation with the complemented strain CΔsalKR showed clearly that the reintroduction of salKR into ΔsalKR restored its high pathogenicity. Five out of six piglets succumbed to the lethal infections of CΔsalKR and died, with median survival times of 2 to 3 days. The last one recovered from serious clinical symptoms and survived at the experiments end. All these results strongly suggest that SalK/SalR plays an important role in the pathogenesis of Chinese isolates of highly invasive SS2.

Figure 5
SPF-piglet experimental infections.

To better evaluate the virulence attenuation of ΔsalKR, colonization experiments were carried out. As shown in Table 1, wild-type bacteria were found in all of the SS2 specific tissues of WT-infected piglets, including heart, lung, liver, kidney, spleen, tonsil, brain, blood, joints and so on. In contrast, in the mutant-inoculated group, no mutant bacteria could be recovered from any of the examined tissue specimens. Obviously, lack of SalK/SalR badly impaired the capability of 05ZYH33 to colonize the various tissues of piglets. In the WT/ΔsalKR coinfection group, besides the detection of wild-type bacteria in all the specimens, ΔsalKR mutant bacteria could also be isolated from some susceptible tissues (such as heart, kidney, tonsil and brain) at a lower degree than the wild-type strain. We anticipated that the ΔsalKR mutant is still able to colonize these organs, is just due to the WT-mediated impairment of host defense against SS2 infection in these tissues.

Table 1
Colonization analysis of ΔsalKR in various tissues of piglets (CFU/g tissue).

Decreased Resistance of ΔsalKR to PMN-Mediated Killing

Together with the wild type strain, ΔsalKR was subjected to PMN-mediated killing assays. We found that the mortality rate of both strains (WT and ΔsalKR) increased coordinately with the extension of the co-culture time with PMN cells (Fig. 6). However, ΔsalKR had a higher mortality rate than that of WT, which means that ΔsalKR was less able to resist killing by PMNs, key mediators of innate immunity. This result may account partially, if not most of all, for the virulence loss in ΔsalKR.

Figure 6
Decreased resistance of ΔsalKR to PMN-mediated killing.

Expression Microarray Analysis of the Mutant Strain ΔsalKR

To gain further insights into the network/circuit mediated by SalK/SalR, whole-genome DNA microarray was applied to reveal the differential transcription profiles between ΔsalKR and WT [13], [19]. For identifying genes whose expression was significantly different, the threshold for the expression ratio between the mutant and wild type strain was set at 2. In total, the absence of SalK/SalR led to decreased expression of 26 genes spread throughout the genome (i.e. 1.2% of the 2194 tested). These down-regulated genes can be roughly categorized into the 3 groups, which can be found in Table 2.

Table 2
Collection of the down-regulated genes in ΔsalKR.

Genes involved in substance transport and metabolism

In the ΔsalKR mutant, transcripts of several ABC-transporters are less abundant. As learned, ABC-transporters and permeases are usually involved in controlling influx and efflux of small molecules through metabolic pathways in response to environmental changes in bacteria [27]. Multidrug resistance [28], [29] and pathogenicity [10] can also be attributed to ABC-transporters. It is widely accepted that over-expression of ABC-type multidrug transporters can efficiently evade the pressure of drugs and enhance the invasion ability of pathogens [28][30]. Furthermore, orotidine-5-phosphate decarboxylase (05SSU1009), a newly identified pathogenesis-related protein in Vibrio vulnificus [31], was also found to be repressed greatly in ΔsalKR. Daigle et al. [32] has shown that mutation of phosphotransferase system (PST) in extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli (ExPEC) can cause the loss of its colonization ability in extraintestinal organs, and bacteria are cleared rapidly from the bloodstream. Similarly, we observed that pst (05SSU0451) is down-regulated in ΔsalKR whose survival in the bloodstream is drastically affected (Fig. 6).

Genes revolved in recombination/repair and transcription

Together with some elements of DNA recombination/repair (05SSU0063, 05SSU0588 and 05SSU0953), two transcription regulators (05SSU0503 and 05SSU1233) were also under the regulation of SalK/SalR. Although these genes were found to be down-regulated in the mutant, it is not understood how they are associated with the attenuation of ΔsalKR.

Genes encoding proteins of unknown function

Several membrane proteins such as 05SSU0677 and 05SSU1912 were also repressed in ΔsalKR. It is well documented that surface proteins or cell wall-anchored proteins are usually thought to contribute to the immunogenicity [33], [34], invasiveness [35][37], and even pathogenesis [38], [39] of pathogens. Moreover, it should be noted that numerous proteins of unknown function are also depressed in ΔsalKR, which may in part lead to the virulence loss of the mutant via some thus-far-unknown mechanisms.

Remarkably, no gene was found to be up-regulated (more than twice) in ΔsalKR. To examine the validity of the microarray data, we performed further quantitative real-time PCR analysis on 42 genes using RNA from three independent cultures of each strain (WT, the ΔsalKR mutant and the complemented strain CΔsalKR). These genes include the total 26 ones that are down-regulated in the ΔsalKR mutant, four virulence factors (CPS, MRP, EF, SLY) coding genes [40][44], genes immediately flanking the salKR locus (05SSU0945 and 05SSU0942), and 10 genes that selected from the chromosome of 05ZYH33 every 200 ORFs. As shown in Table S1, the quantitative results of RT-PCR were highly compatible to the microarray data, in the ΔsalKR mutant, 41 out of 42 selected genes (97.6%) were confirmed to have similar transcript levels using these two different techniques, thus independently confirming the microarray results. The discrepancies of target genes expression between microarray data and real-time quantitative PCR results probably best reflects differences in the relative sensitivity and specificity of the two methods. Among the 26 down-regulated genes in the ΔsalKR mutant, five did not recover to expression level of the wild-type strain, indicating that the complemented strain does not imitate completely the exact tuning of gene expression as in the wild-type strain.


Since the first description of human infection in Denmark in 1968, SS2 seems to have developed some unknown machinery to behave much more invasively, which is supported by two recent large-scale outbreaks of human epidemics in China (one had 25 cases with 14 deaths in Jiangsu in 1998, the second had 204 cases with 38 deaths in Sichuan in 2005) [4], [5]. During the past decades, a series of virulence determinants of SS2 involved in the survival, spread and pathopoiesis of the bacterium within the host have been identified, such as capsule polysaccharide (CPS), muramidase-related protein (MRP), suilysin, etc. Very recently, Chen et al. [6] reported a candidate PAI of ∼89 kb in the epidemic outbreak strains of SS2 infections in China, gave some genomic clues for elucidating molecular pathways by which SS2 behaved so aggressively. However, they did not provide sufficient experimental evidence supporting the prediction of 89K PAI which was largely based on the results of bioinformatical analysis, and the functions of the vast majority of genes encoding within the 89K island remain largely unknown.

In this study, we carried out a detailed structural and functional analysis of a unique two-component regulatory system designated SalK/SalR which is located in the putative 89K PAI. Bioinformatics analysis revealed that the GC content of salKR is far less than that of 89K island and the whole genome, implying that this TCSTS is of foreign origin which may have been acquired through horizontal gene transfer. It has been well documented that horizontal gene transfer events occur frequently in pathogens [45][47], and some of them have been implicated in high pathogenicity [48] and even in the causation of severe diseases [49]. Suilysin, a known virulence factor, was believed to be introduced into SS2 via lateral gene transfer [43]. Moreover, PCR analysis using primers amplifying the salKR locus also demonstrated that this TCSTS is specific to Chinese epidemic outbreak strains of SS2 (data not shown), implying its tight linkage to the virulence of this new emerging pathogenic species.

In order to define the role of SalK/SalR in SS2 infection, an isogenic SalK/SalR-deficient mutant was generated and the impact of salKR deletion on virulence of SS2 was assessed. Results of piglets experimental infections clearly showed that the deletion of salKR leads to elimination of the lethality of this important pathogen. Colonization analysis also revealed the incapability of the ΔsalKR mutant to colonize any susceptible tissue of piglets when administered alone. These results indicate definitely that SalK/SalR plays a critical role in the pathogenicity of SS2. The reduction in virulence was mostly restored in a complemented strain upon reintroduction of functional copies of salK and salR into the mutant, suggesting that it did not result from polar effects on expression of flanking genes. We consider that the partial complementation observed in the piglets infection model is inherent to the pleiotropic role of this regulatory system which makes it difficult to restore the fine tuning of gene expression as in the wild-type strain. Results of real-time quantitative RT-PCR also confirmed that, in the complemented strain CΔsalKR, only partial genes identified as down-regulated in the mutant rebounded to comparative transcript levels of the wild-type strain. Those unrecovered genes were probably irrelavent to the bacterial virulence of SS2.

It is known that TCSTSs are often implicated in the regulation of the direct downstream genes. However, genes immediately flanking the salKR locus were identified as transcriptionally unaffected by the disruption of the salKR genes. This result is in agreement with the predicted operon organization in the genome, which suggests that salK and salR are a single co-transcriptional unit. Among the 26 target genes affected by SalK/SalR, 17 of them (65.4%) were predicted to be monocistronically transcribed, the others to be part of larger transcriptional units (Table 2). For those members belonging to putative transcriptional operons, microarray results showed that most of those genes cotranscribed with them were also down-regulated to a various degree, although under the threshold of 2. In the 89K island, transcripts of only two genes designated 05SSU0935 and 05SSU0953 that encode a hypothetical protein and a DNA recombinase respectively, were decreased in ΔsalKR, their contributions to the attenuation are unknown. It seems that SalK/SalR may control the full virulence of SS2 by regulating distant gene expression at the genome-wide level. Further investigation of other transcriptional alterations observed in the microarray data will be required for a better understanding of pathogenesis of this highly pathogenic pathogen. Efforts are currently being made in order to address functions of those down-regulated hypothetical proteins individually.

It has been described that genes essential for viability and important virulence factors are often under the regulation of TCSTS. However, in our study, neither microarray findings nor further analysis of real-time quantitative RT-PCR revealed any differences in level of transcription of the known virulence factors (CPS, suilysin, MRP and EF) between the wild type and mutant strain. Several possible explanations may be envisaged. First, some pathogenic determinants are environmentally regulated and induced at specific stages of the infection process [50], [51]. Secondly, some of the TCSTSs of S. pneumoniae were suggested to be involved in key processes of pathogenesis, such as autolysis and cell-cell signaling [52], SalK/SalR might regulate similar processes in Chinese SS2 virulent isolates. More importantly, accumulated evidence suggests that some of the known virulent factors are not requisite for the full virulence of SS2, as the absence of one or more of these proteins in isolates from infected animals cannot necessarily be associated with a lack of virulence [53][56].

In conclusion, a unique two-component regulatory system SalK/SalR has been identified from a putative 89K PAI in Chinese isolates of highly pathogenic SS2. Prior to this study, SalK/SalR is only known to be associated with the production of a kind of lantibiotic peptide named salivaricin A (SalA) in S. salivarius [11], as yet, this TCSTS has not been linked to the regulation of bacterial virulence. Our data confirm, for the first time, that SalK/SalR is absolutely indispensable for the full virulence of Chinese highly invasive SS2 strains, although we fails to define its precise regulatory mechanism. Not only does this investigation provide experimental evidence for the validity of the candidate 89K PAI, but it adds novel insights into the infectious disease pathogenesis of SS2.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial Strains, Plasmids and Growth Conditions

Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 3. SS2 strains were grown in Todd-Hewitt broth (THB) (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI) medium or plated on THB agar containing 5% (vol/vol) sheep blood. E. coli DH5α was cultured in Luria Broth (LB) liquid medium or plated on LB agar. When necessary, 100 µg/ml of spectinomycin (Spc) (Sigma) or 5 µg/ml of chloromycetin (Cm) (Sigma) was used for S. suis transformants, and 50 µg/ml of ampicillin (Amp) (Sigma) was applied to screen the transformants of E. coli.

Table 3
Summary of bacterial strains and plasmids.

Construction of S. suis Mutant, ΔsalKR

To test the role of SalK/SalR in the pathogenesis of SS2, salKR was activated by allelic replacement with a constitutively expressed spectinomycin resistance (SpcR) cassette. First, the flanking DNA sequences to salKR were amplified from the chromosomal DNA of S. suis 05ZYH33 using PCR technique with two pairs of specific primers (LA-F1/LA-R1 and RA-F1/RA-R1) carrying EcoR I/BamH I and Pst I/Hind III restriction enzyme sites, respectively (Table 4). Followed by digestion with the corresponding restriction enzymes, the DNA fragments were cloned into a pUC18 vector directionally. Then, the SpcR gene cassette (from pSET2) was inserted at the BamH I/Pst I sites to generate the salKR knockout vector pUC::salKR. To obtain the isogenic mutant ΔsalKR, the competent cells of 05ZYH33 were subjected to electrotransformation with pUC::salKR as described by Smith et al. [57]. For all the SpcR transformants, colony PCR assay was used to examine them with a series of specific primers. To further confirm whether the suspected mutant was caused by double cross-over recombination, Southern blotting analysis was carried out. The DNA probes including SpcR gene, an internal fragment of salKR, and pUC18 were labeled with biotin using the random primed DNA labeling kit (Pierce). The hybridization signals were detected with the hybridization and detection kit (Pierce) according to the standard protocol recommended by the manufacturer.

Table 4
Primers used for PCR amplification and detection.

Functional Complementation of ΔsalKR

For complementation analysis, the following strategy was utilized. A DNA fragment containing salKR and its upstream promoter was amplified by PCR. Digested with the appropriate restriction enzymes, the resulting DNA fragment was cloned into the E. coli-S. suis shuttle vector pSET1 to generate the recombinant plasmid pSET::C. Then pSET::C was electrotransformed into the ΔsalKR mutant to screen the complemented strain of ΔsalKR (namely CΔsalKR) on THB agar with double selection pressure of Spc and Cm.

Experimental Infections of Piglets

To evaluate the effect of salKR deletion on the virulence of 05ZYH33, three-week-old SPF-piglets (6 piglets/group) were challenged with ΔsalKR and its complementary strain CΔsalKR. The virulent wild type (WT), 05ZYH33, and an avirulent strain, 05HAS68, were utilized as positive reference and negative reference, respectively [5]. As a matter of fact, 50% lethal doses should be ascertained in order to determine differences in virulence between the wild type and mutant strain. For ethical reasons, we could not do this kind of experiment in piglets. Instead, groups of six SPF-piglets were inoculated intravenously with the above 4 types of SS2 strains (dose of 108 CFU/piglet) respectively. Clinical signs and survival time were then recorded. All animal experiments were performed in a facility of bio-safety level 3 (BSL-3) and approved by the local ethical committee.

Colonization ability analysis of ΔsalKR in susceptible tissues of piglets

To better define the difference between the WT strain and the ΔsalKR mutant, the capability of each strain to colonize the various tissues of piglets was analyzed. Groups of three SPF-piglets were inoculated intravenously with the wild type strain 05ZYH33, ΔsalKR mutant and a 1∶1 mixture of WT/ΔsalKR, respectively, at a dose of 108 CFU/piglet. When the WT-infected piglets developed typical SS2 infection symptoms, all these three groups of piglets were sacrificed for colonization analysis as previously described [58].

PMN-mediated Killing Experiments

Polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs, also called neutrophils) were isolated from heparinized venous blood of healthy piglets using the method of dextran sedimentation as described by Baltimore et al.[59]. After removing the contaminant erythrocytes by adding ice-chilled 0.2% NaCl, the excess neutrophils were resuspended in RPMI 1640 medium (Mediatech). The viabilities of neutrophils were confirmed using trypan blue dye exclusion. Killing experiments of SS2 by pig PMNs were carried out as described in earlier methods with minor modifications [60], [61]. Briefly, SS2 in exponential phase were washed, and resuspended in RPMI 1640. Bacteria were opsonized in 50% normal pig serum for 30 min at 37°C, and then concentrated to 108 CFU in RPMI 1640. PMNs (106) were combined with 107 opsonized SS2 in 96-well plates on ice and centrifuged at 380× g for 5 min at 4°C. Samples were analyzed immediately. At each time, PMNs were lysed with 0.1% saponin (20 min on ice), and serial dilutions of the lysates were plated on THB agar. Colonies were counted and the percentage of SS2 killed was measured with the equation of [1−(CFUPMN+/CFUPMN−)]×100% [16]. Each assay was performed in triplicate.

Microarray-based Comparative Transcriptomics Analysis of ΔsalKR

According to the whole genome sequence of 05ZYH33, specific oligo-nucleotide probes with an average length of 35 nt were designed to cover every putative ORF (2194 in total) in SS2 genome using Array Designer 2.0 and then synthesized onto complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) matrix utilizing in situ electrochemical synthesis technique (Combimatrix). Total RNA was extracted from SS2 cultures grown in THB to OD600 of 0.8, with Trizol reagent (Invitrogen), and purified using RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen). Subsequently, cDNA was labeled with Cy3-dCTP during the reverse transcription. After pre-hybridization, microarray slides were hybridized with the relevant samples at 65°C for 12∼16 h [62]. This was repeated 4 times for both samples (WT and ΔsalKR). All hybridization slides were scanned by GenePix 4100A scanner after appropriate washing, and the average pixel intensity values were quantified using GenePix Pro 4.1. Statistical analysis was performed, e.g., t-test and P-value. Finally, those genes with more than twice of change ratio were selected to be candidate targets [62].

Real-time Quantitative RT-PCR Evaluation

To validate the data from microarray analysis, 42 genes were selected to confirm by real-time quantitative PCR with SYBR Green detection as described [63]. Quantitative analysis were performed in triplicate with SYBR premix Ex Taq™ (TaKaRa) on an Opticon 2 (MJ Research, USA) using RNA from three independent cultures of each strain (WT, ΔsalKR and CΔsalKR). Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was utilized to serve as the internal control gene. Various Ct values were normalized to average Ct values for the endogenous reference transcript, GAPDH [63]. The mean fold changes in target gene expression were calculated as described by Livak et al. [64].

Statistical Analysis

Where appropriate, the data were analyzed using Student's t test, and a value of P<0.05 was considered significant.

Supporting Information

Table S1

Real-time quantitative RT-PCR validation of microarray data

(0.08 MB DOC)

Table S2

Theoretical size (bp) of each of the PCR products generated with the primer combinations used in the multiple-PCR analysis of ΔsalKR mutant

(0.03 MB DOC)


We thank Dr. Shibo Jiang at New York Blood Center in U.S.A for critical reading of the manuscript. We are very grateful to Dr. Daisuke Takamatsu at National Institute of Animal Health of Japan for the generous gifts of the E. coli-S. suis shuttle vectors pSET1 and pSET2. We are also grateful to Mr. Xinqiao Wang for his technical assistance.


Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Funding: The work was supported by National High-Tech Research & Development Project 863 (2006AA0Z455), National Natural Science Foundation of China (30670105&30600533), National Key Technologies R&D Programs (2006BAD06A01) and National Basic Research Program (973) of China (2005CB523001&2007CB512402), and Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China (BK2006014&BK2007013).


1. Staats JJ, Feder I, Okwumabua O, Chengappa MM. Streptococcus suis: past and present. Vet Res Commun. 1997;21:381–407. [PubMed]
2. Lun ZR, Wang QP, Chen XG, Li AX, Zhu XQ. Streptococcus suis: an emerging zoonotic pathogen. Lancet Infect Dis. 2007;7:201–209. [PubMed]
3. Normile D. Infectious diseases. WHO probes deadliness of China's pig-borne disease. Science. 2005;309:1308–1309. [PubMed]
4. Sriskandan S, Slater JD. Invasive disease and toxic shock due to zoonotic Streptococcus suis: an emerging infection in the East? PLoS Med. 2006;3:e187. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
5. Tang J, Wang C, Feng Y, Yang W, Song H, et al. Streptococcal toxic shock syndrome caused by Streptococcus suis serotype 2. PLoS Med. 2006;3:e151. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
6. Chen C, Tang J, Dong W, Wang C, Feng Y, et al. A Glimpse of Streptococcal Toxic Shock Syndrome from Comparative Genomics of S. suis 2 Chinese Isolates. PLoS ONE. 2007;2:e315. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Lee CA. Pathogenicity islands and the evolution of bacterial pathogens. Infect Agents Dis. 1996;5:1–7. [PubMed]
8. Schmidt H, Hensel M. Pathogenicity islands in bacterial pathogenesis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2004;17:14–56. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Gal-Mor O, Finlay BB. Pathogenicity islands: a molecular toolbox for bacterial virulence. Cell Microbiol. 2006;8:1707–1719. [PubMed]
10. Brown JS, Gilliland SM, Holden DW. A Streptococcus pneumoniae pathogenicity island encoding an ABC transporter involved in iron uptake and virulence. Mol Microbiol. 2001;40:572–585. [PubMed]
11. Upton M, Tagg JR, Wescombe P, Jenkinson HF. Intra- and interspecies signaling between Streptococcus salivarius and Streptococcus pyogenes mediated by SalA and SalA1 lantibiotic peptides. J Bacteriol. 2001;183:3931–3938. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Shimizu T, Shima K, Yoshino K, Yonezawa K, Shimizu T, et al. Proteome and transcriptome analysis of the virulence genes regulated by the VirR/VirS system in Clostridium perfringens. J Bacteriol. 2002;184:2587–2594. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. McCluskey J, Hinds J, Husain S, Witney A, Mitchell TJ. A two-component system that controls the expression of pneumococcal surface antigen A (PsaA) and regulates virulence and resistance to oxidative stress in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Mol Microbiol. 2004;51:1661–1675. [PubMed]
14. Liang X, Zheng L, Landwehr C, Lunsford D, Holmes D, et al. Global regulation of gene expression by ArlRS, a two-component signal transduction regulatory system of Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol. 2005;187:5486–5492. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Ng WL, Tsui HC, Winkler ME. Regulation of the pspA virulence factor and essential pcsB murein biosynthetic genes by the phosphorylated VicR (YycF) response regulator in Streptococcus pneumoniae. J Bacteriol. 2005;187:7444–7459. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Sumby P, Whitney AR, Graviss EA, DeLeo FR, Musser JM. Genome-wide analysis of group a streptococci reveals a mutation that modulates global phenotype and disease specificity. PLoS Pathog. 2006;2:e5. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Lamy MC, Zouine M, Fert J, Vergassola M, Couve E, et al. CovS/CovR of group B streptococcus: a two-component global regulatory system involved in virulence. Mol Microbiol. 2004;54:1250–1268. [PubMed]
18. Beier D, Gross R. Regulation of bacterial virulence by two-component systems. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2006;9:143–152. [PubMed]
19. Graham MR, Smoot LM, Migliaccio CA, Virtaneva K, Sturdevant DE, et al. Virulence control in group A Streptococcus by a two-component gene regulatory system: global expression profiling and in vivo infection modeling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:13855–13860. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Miller AA, Engleberg NC, DiRita VJ. Repression of virulence genes by phosphorylation-dependent oligomerization of CsrR at target promoters in S. pyogenes. Mol Microbiol. 2001;40:976–990. [PubMed]
21. Ba-Thein W, Lyristis M, Ohtani K, Nisbet IT, Hayashi H, et al. The virR/virS locus regulates the transcription of genes encoding extracellular toxin production in Clostridium perfringens. J Bacteriol. 1996;178:2514–2520. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
22. Banu S, Ohtani K, Yaguchi H, Swe T, Cole ST, et al. Identification of novel VirR/VirS-regulated genes in Clostridium perfringens. Mol Microbiol. 2000;35:854–864. [PubMed]
23. Shimizu T, Ba-Thein W, Tamaki M, Hayashi H. The virR gene, a member of a class of two-component response regulators, regulates the production of perfringolysin O, collagenase, and hemagglutinin in Clostridium perfringens. J Bacteriol. 1994;176:1616–1623. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. de Greeff A, Buys H, van Alphen L, Smith HE. Response regulator important in pathogenesis of Streptococcus suis serotype 2. Microb Pathog. 2002;33:185–192. [PubMed]
25. Parkinson JS, Kofoid EC. Communication modules in bacterial signaling proteins. Annu Rev Genet. 1992;26:71–112. [PubMed]
26. Whitehead NA, Barnard AM, Slater H, Simpson NJ, Salmond GP. Quorum-sensing in Gram-negative bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2001;25:365–404. [PubMed]
27. Yazaki K. ABC transporters involved in the transport of plant secondary metabolites. FEBS Lett. 2006;580:1183–1191. [PubMed]
28. Sipos G, Kuchler K. Fungal ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters in drug resistance & detoxification. Curr Drug Targets. 2006;7:471–481. [PubMed]
29. Jones PM, George AM. Multidrug resistance in parasites: ABC transporters, P-glycoproteins and molecular modelling. Int J Parasitol. 2005;35:555–566. [PubMed]
30. Wolfger H, Mamnun YM, Kuchler K. Fungal ABC proteins: pleiotropic drug resistance, stress response and cellular detoxification. Res Microbiol. 2001;152:375–389. [PubMed]
31. Shin NR, Lee DY, Yoo HS. Identification of quorum sensing-related regulons in Vibrio vulnificus by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and differentially displayed reverse transcriptase PCR. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2007;50:94–103. [PubMed]
32. Daigle F, Fairbrother JM, Harel J. Identification of a mutation in the pst-phoU operon that reduces pathogenicity of an Escherichia coli strain causing septicemia in pigs. Infect Immun. 1995;63:4924–4927. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
33. Feng Y, Zheng F, Pan X, Sun W, Wang C, et al. Existence and characterization of allelic variants of Sao, a newly identified surface protein from Streptococcus suis. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2007;275:80–88. [PubMed]
34. Li Y, Martinez G, Gottschalk M, Lacouture S, Willson P, et al. Identification of a surface protein of Streptococcus suis and evaluation of its immunogenic and protective capacity in pigs. Infect Immun. 2006;74:305–312. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
35. Staats JJ, Plattner BL, Stewart GC, Changappa MM. Presence of the Streptococcus suis suilysin gene and expression of MRP and EF correlates with high virulence in Streptococcus suis type 2 isolates. Vet Microbiol. 1999;70:201–211. [PubMed]
36. Jonsson IM, Mazmanian SK, Schneewind O, Verdrengh M, Bremell T, et al. On the role of Staphylococcus aureus sortase and sortase-catalyzed surface protein anchoring in murine septic arthritis. J Infect Dis. 2002;185:1417–1424. [PubMed]
37. Berthelot-Herault F, Morvan H, Keribin AM, Gottschalk M, Kobisch M. Production of muraminidase-released protein (MRP), extracellular factor (EF) and suilysin by field isolates of Streptococcus suis capsular types 2, 1/2, 9, 7 and 3 isolated from swine in France. Vet Res. 2000;31:473–479. [PubMed]
38. Herwald H, Cramer H, Morgelin M, Russell W, Sollenberg U, et al. M protein, a classical bacterial virulence determinant, forms complexes with fibrinogen that induce vascular leakage. Cell. 2004;116:367–379. [PubMed]
39. Smith HE, Vecht U, Gielkens AL, Smits MA. Cloning and nucleotide sequence of the gene encoding the 136-kilodalton surface protein (muramidase-released protein) of Streptococcus suis type 2. Infect Immun. 1992;60:2361–2367. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
40. Smith HE, de Vries R, van't Slot R, Smits MA. The cps locus of Streptococcus suis serotype 2: genetic determinant for the synthesis of sialic acid. Microb Pathog. 2000;29:127–134. [PubMed]
41. Charland N, Harel J, Kobisch M, Lacasse S, Gottschalk M. Streptococcus suis serotype 2 mutants deficient in capsular expression. Microbiology. 1998;144 (Pt 2):325–332. [PubMed]
42. Tarradas C, Borge C, Arenas A, Maldonado A, Astorga R, et al. Suilysin production by Streptococcus suis strains isolated from diseased and healthy carrier pigs in Spain. Vet Rec. 2001;148:183–184. [PubMed]
43. Takamatsu D, Osaki M, Sekizaki T. Evidence for lateral transfer of the Suilysin gene region of Streptococcus suis. J Bacteriol. 2002;184:2050–2057. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
44. Lun S, Perez-Casal J, Connor W, Willson PJ. Role of suilysin in pathogenesis of Streptococcus suis capsular serotype 2. Microb Pathog. 2003;34:27–37. [PubMed]
45. Roberts AP, Mullany P. Genetic basis of horizontal gene transfer among oral bacteria. Periodontol 2000. 2006;42:36–46. [PubMed]
46. Kurland CG, Canback B, Berg OG. Horizontal gene transfer: a critical view. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:9658–9662. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
47. Jain R, Rivera MC, Moore JE, Lake JA. Horizontal gene transfer in microbial genome evolution. Theor Popul Biol. 2002;61:489–495. [PubMed]
48. Kehoe MA, Kapur V, Whatmore AM, Musser JM. Horizontal gene transfer among group A streptococci: implications for pathogenesis and epidemiology. Trends Microbiol. 1996;4:436–443. [PubMed]
49. Sanders IR. Rapid disease emergence through horizontal gene transfer between eukaryotes. Trends Ecol Evol. 2006;21:656–658. [PubMed]
50. Mahan MJ, Slauch JM, Mekalanos JJ. Selection of bacterial virulence genes that are specifically induced in host tissues. Science. 1993;259:686–688. [PubMed]
51. Vecht U, Wisselink HJ, van Dijk JE, Smith HE. Virulence of Streptococcus suis type 2 strains in newborn germfree pigs depends on phenotype. Infect Immun. 1992;60:550–556. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
52. Throup JP, Koretke KK, Bryant AP, Ingraham KA, Chalker AF, et al. A genomic analysis of two-component signal transduction in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Mol Microbiol. 2000;35:566–576. [PubMed]
53. Smith HE, Vecht U, Wisselink HJ, Stockhofe-Zurwieden N, Biermann Y, et al. Mutants of Streptococcus suis types l and 2 impaired in expression of muramidase-released protein and extracellular protein induce disease in newborn germfree pigs. Infect lmmun. 1996;64:4409–4412. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
54. Gottschalk M, Lebrun A, Wisselink H, Dubreuil JD, Smith H, et al. Production of virulence related-proteins by Canadian strains of Streptococcus suis capsular type 2. Can J Vet Res. 1998;62:75–79. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
55. Gottschalk M, Higgins R, Quessy S. Dilemma of the virulence of Strptococcus suis strains. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37:4202–4203. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
56. Berthelot-Herault F, Gottschalk M, Morvan H, Kobisch M. Dilemma of virulence of Streptococcus suis: Canadian isolate 89-1591 characterized as a virulent strain using a standardized experimental model in pigs. Can J Vet Res. 2005;69:236–240. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
57. Smith HE, Wisselink HJ, Vecht U, Gielkens AL, Smits MA. High-efficiency transformation and gene inactivation in Streptococcus suis type 2. Microbiology. 1995;141:181–188. [PubMed]
58. de Greeff A, Buys H, Verhaar R, Dijkstra J, van Alphen L, et al. Contribution of fibronectin-binding protein to pathogenesis of Streptococcus suis serotype 2. Infect Immun. 2002;70:1319–1325. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
59. Baltimore RS, Kasper DL, Baker CJ, Goroff DK. Antigenic specificity of opsonophagocytic antibodies in rabbit anti-sera to group B streptococci. J Immunol. 1977;118:673–678. [PubMed]
60. Kobayashi SD, Braughton KR, Whitney AR, Voyich JM, Schwan TG, et al. Bacterial pathogens modulate an apoptosis differentiation program in human neutrophils. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:10948–10953. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
61. Voyich JM, Sturdevant DE, Braughton KR, Kobayashi SD, Lei B, et al. Genome-wide protective response used by group A Streptococcus to evade destruction by human polymorphonuclear leukocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:1996–2001. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
62. de Saizieu A, Gardes C, Flint N, Wagner C, Kamber M, et al. Microarray-based identification of a novel Streptococcus pneumoniae regulon controlled by an autoinduced peptide. J Bacteriol. 2000;182:4696–4703. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
63. Schmittgen TD, Zakrajsek BA. Effect of experimental treatment on housekeeping gene expression: validation by real-time, quantitative RT-PCR. J Biochem Biophys Methods. 2000;46:69–81. [PubMed]
64. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001;25:402–408. [PubMed]
65. Takamatsu D, Osaki M, Sekizaki T. Construction and characterization of Streptococcus suis-Escherichia coli shuttle cloning vectors. Plasmid. 2001;45:101–113. [PubMed]

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of Public Library of Science
PubReader format: click here to try


Save items

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...


  • Compound
    PubChem chemical compound records that cite the current articles. These references are taken from those provided on submitted PubChem chemical substance records. Multiple substance records may contribute to the PubChem compound record.
  • MedGen
    Related information in MedGen
  • PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles
  • Substance
    PubChem chemical substance records that cite the current articles. These references are taken from those provided on submitted PubChem chemical substance records.
  • Taxonomy
    Taxonomy records associated with the current articles through taxonomic information on related molecular database records (Nucleotide, Protein, Gene, SNP, Structure).
  • Taxonomy Tree
    Taxonomy Tree

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...