• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of bmjBMJ helping doctors make better decisionsSearch bmj.comLatest content
BMJ. Nov 23, 1996; 313(7068): 1306–1309.
PMCID: PMC2352740

Collaborative survey of perinatal loss in planned and unplanned home births. Northern Region Perinatal Mortality Survey Coordinating Group.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To document the outcome of planned and unplanned births outside hospital. DESIGN: Confidential review of every pregnancy ending in stillbirth or neonatal death in which plans had been made for home delivery, irrespective of where delivery eventually occurred. The review was part of a sustained collaborative survey of all perinatal deaths. SETTING: Northern Regional Health Authority area. SUBJECTS: All 558,691 registered births to women normally resident in the former Northern Regional Health Authority area during 1981-94. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Perinatal death. RESULTS: The estimated perinatal mortality during 1981-94 among women booked for a home birth was 14 deaths in 2888 births. This was less than half that among all women in the region. Only three of the 14 women delivered outside hospital. Independent review suggested that two of the 14 deaths might have been averted by different management. Both births occurred in hospital, and in only one was management before admission of the mother judged inappropriate. Perinatal loss to the 64 women who booked for hospital delivery but delivered outside and to the 67 women who delivered outside hospital without ever making arrangements to receive professional care during labour accounted for the high perinatal mortality (134 deaths in 3466 deliveries) among all births outside hospital. CONCLUSIONS: The perinatal hazard associated with planned home birth in the few women who exercised this option (< 1%) was low and mostly unavoidable. Health authorities purchasing maternity care need to address the much greater hazard associated with unplanned delivery outside hospital.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (913K), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Murphy JF, Dauncey M, Gray OP, Chalmers I. Planned and unplanned deliveries at home: implications of a changing ratio. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1984 May 12;288(6428):1429–1432. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Campbell R, Davies IM, Macfarlane A, Beral V. Home births in England and Wales, 1979: perinatal mortality according to intended place of delivery. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1984 Sep 22;289(6447):721–724. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Davies J, Hey E, Reid W, Young G. Prospective regional study of planned home births. Home Birth Study Steering Group. BMJ. 1996 Nov 23;313(7068):1302–1306. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Ford C, Iliffe S, Franklin O. Outcome of planned home births in an inner city practice. BMJ. 1991 Dec 14;303(6816):1517–1519. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Cole SK, Macfarlane A. Safety and place of birth in Scotland. J Public Health Med. 1995 Mar;17(1):17–24. [PubMed]
  • Barron SL, Thomson AM, Philips PR. Home and hospital confinement in Newcastle upon Tyne, 1960 to 1969. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1977 Jun;84(6):401–411. [PubMed]
  • Lilford RJ. Clinical experimentation in obstetrics. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1987 Nov 21;295(6609):1298–1300. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Woodcock HC, Read AW, Bower C, Stanley FJ, Moore DJ. A matched cohort study of planned home and hospital births in Western Australia 1981-1987. Midwifery. 1994 Sep;10(3):125–135. [PubMed]
  • Tyson H. Outcomes of 1001 midwife-attended home births in Toronto, 1983-1988. Birth. 1991 Mar;18(1):14–19. [PubMed]
  • Duran AM. The safety of home birth: the farm study. Am J Public Health. 1992 Mar;82(3):450–453. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Anderson RE, Murphy PA. Outcomes of 11,788 planned home births attended by certified nurse-midwives. A retrospective descriptive study. J Nurse Midwifery. 1995 Nov-Dec;40(6):483–492. [PubMed]
  • Hoff GA, Schneiderman LJ. Having babies at home: is it safe? Is it ethical? Hastings Cent Rep. 1985 Dec;15(6):19–27. [PubMed]
  • Hafner-Eaton C, Pearce LK. Birth choices, the law, and medicine: balancing individual freedoms and protection of the public's health. J Health Polit Policy Law. 1994 Winter;19(4):813–835. [PubMed]
  • Shepperdson B. Home or hospital birth? A study of women's attitudes. Health Visit. 1983 Nov;56(11):405–406. [PubMed]
  • Morgan BM, Bulpitt CJ, Clifton P, Lewis PJ. The consumers' attitude to obstetric care. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1984 Jul;91(7):624–628. [PubMed]
  • Caplan M, Madeley RJ. Home deliveries in Nottingham 1980-81. Public Health. 1985 Sep;99(5):307–313. [PubMed]
  • Taylor A. Maternity services: the consumer's view. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1986 Apr;36(285):157–160. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Holdsworth JE. General practitioner obstetrics. BMJ. 1989 Apr 29;298(6681):c1177–1178. [PMC free article]
  • Johnson M, Smith J, Haddad S, Walker J, Wong A. Women prefer hospital births. BMJ. 1992 Jul 25;305(6847):255–255. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Glasier A, Anderson F. Women's preference for place of birth. BMJ. 1992 Aug 22;305(6851):476–476. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Group

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

  • Cited in Books
    Cited in Books
    PubMed Central articles cited in books
  • MedGen
    MedGen
    Related information in MedGen
  • PubMed
    PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...