• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of bmjBMJ helping doctors make better decisionsSearch bmj.comLatest content
BMJ. Nov 23, 1996; 313(7068): 1309–1313.
PMCID: PMC2352715

Outcome of planned home and planned hospital births in low risk pregnancies: prospective study in midwifery practices in The Netherlands.


OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relation between the intended place of birth (home or hospital) and perinatal outcome in women with low risk pregnancies after controlling for parity and social, medical, and obstetric background. DESIGN: Analysis of prospective data from midwives and their clients. SETTING: 54 midwifery practices in the province of Gelderland, Netherlands. SUBJECTS: 97 midwives and 1836 women with low risk pregnancies who had planned to give birth at home or in hospital. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Perinatal outcome index based on "maximal result with minimal intervention" and incorporating 22 items on childbirth, 9 on the condition of the newborn, and 5 on the mother after the birth. RESULTS: There was no relation between the planned place of birth and perinatal outcome in primiparous women when controlling for a favourable or less favourable background. In multiparous women, perinatal outcome was significantly better for planned home births than for planned hospital births, with or without control for background variables. CONCLUSIONS: The outcome of planned home births is at least as good as that of planned hospital births in women at low risk receiving midwifery care in the Netherlands.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (1.0M), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • van Teijlingen E, McCaffery P. The profession of midwife in The Netherlands. Midwifery. 1987 Dec;3(4):178–186. [PubMed]
  • Damstra-Wijmenga SM. Home confinement: the positive results in Holland. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1984 Aug;34(265):425–430. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Prechtl HF. The optimality concept. Early Hum Dev. 1980 Sep;4(3):201–205. [PubMed]
  • Touwen BC, Huisjes HJ, Jurgens-van der Zee AD, Bierman-van Eendenburg ME, Smrkovsky M, Olinga AA. Obstetrical condition and neonatal neurological morbidity. An analysis with the help of the optimality concept. Early Hum Dev. 1980 Sep;4(3):207–228. [PubMed]
  • Wiegers TA, Keirse MJ, Berghs GA, van der Zee J. An approach to measuring quality of midwifery care. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996 Mar;49(3):319–325. [PubMed]
  • Treffers PE, Eskes M, Kleiverda G, van Alten D. Home births and minimal medical interventions. JAMA. 1990 Nov 7;264(17):2203–2208. [PubMed]
  • Crandon AJ. Maternal anxiety and obstetric complications. J Psychosom Res. 1979;23(2):109–111. [PubMed]
  • McPherson K. The Cochrane Lecture. The best and the enemy of the good: randomised controlled trials, uncertainty, and assessing the role of patient choice in medical decision making. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1994 Feb;48(1):6–15. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Group


Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...


  • Cited in Books
    Cited in Books
    PubMed Central articles cited in books
  • MedGen
    Related information in MedGen
  • PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...