![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2008, American Thoracic Society Targeting the MEK1 Cascade in Lung Epithelium Inhibits Proliferation and Fibrogenesis by Asbestos Departments of 1Pathology, 2Medicine, 3Medical Biostatistics, and 4Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont; and 5Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut *These authors contributed equally to this study. Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to Brooke T. Mossman, Ph.D., Professor of Pathology, Director, Environmental Pathology Program, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Department of Pathology, 89 Beaumont Avenue, Burlington, VT 05405. E-mail: Brooke.Mossman/at/uvm.edu Received October 23, 2007; Accepted January 7, 2008. Abstract The extracellular signal–regulated kinases 1 and 2 (ERK1/2) are phosphorylated after inhalation of asbestos. The effect of blocking this signaling pathway in lung epithelium is unclear. Asbestos-exposed transgenic mice expressing a dominant-negative mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase-1 (dnMEK1) (i.e., the upstream kinase necessary for phosphorylation of ERK1/2) targeted to lung epithelium exhibited morphologic and molecular changes in lung. Transgene-positive (Tg+) (i.e., dnMEK1) and transgene-negative (Tg−) littermates were exposed to crocidolite asbestos for 2, 4, 9, and 32 days or maintained in clean air (sham controls). Distal bronchiolar epithelium was isolated using laser capture microdissection and mRNA analyzed for molecular markers of proliferation and Clara cell secretory protein (CCSP). Lungs and bronchoalveolar lavage fluids were analyzed for inflammatory and proliferative changes and molecular markers of fibrogenesis. Distal bronchiolar epithelium of asbestos-exposed wild-type mice showed increased expression of c-fos at 2 days. Elevated mRNA levels of histone H3 and numbers of Ki-67–labeled proliferating bronchiolar epithelial cells were decreased at 4 days in asbestos-exposed Tg+ mice. At 32 days, distal bronchioles normally composed of Clara cells in asbestos-exposed Tg+ mouse lungs exhibited nonreplicating ciliated and mucin-secreting cells as well as decreased mRNA levels of CCSP. Gene expression (procollagen 3-a-1, procollagen 1-a-1, and IL-6) linked to fibrogenesis was also increased in lung homogenates of asbestos-exposed Tg− mice, but reduced in asbestos-exposed Tg+ mice. These results suggest a critical role of MEK1 signaling in epithelial cell proliferation and lung remodeling after toxic injury. Keywords: mitogen-activated protein kinases, asbestosis, fibrosis, Clara cell, cell signaling
Signaling cascades generated in the distal bronchiolar epithelium may be important in early injury by or repair from asbestos. Here we first used laser capture microdissection (LCM) and the quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (QRT-PCR) to profile changes in gene expression in distal bronchioles of asbestos-exposed C57/BL6 wild-type mice. We examined mRNA levels of the early response AP-1 protooncogenes, c-jun and c-fos, proliferation-associated genes (histone H3, cyclin D1) and MnSOD (SOD2), an antioxidant enzyme increased after exposure to inflammatory and fibrogenic minerals (8). We then tested the hypothesis that the MEK1/ERK1/2 pathway mediates proliferation and differentiation of bronchiolar epithelium after inhalation of asbestos. To achieve this goal, mice containing a dominant-negative mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase-1 (dnMEK1) transgene (Tg+) targeted to bronchiolar epithelium were created using the CC10 promoter (9). Our results show that modifying MEK1 signaling in distal bronchiolar epithelial cells decreases histone 3 expression and mitogenesis in response to inhaled asbestos fibers. Moreover, differentiation from a predominantly Clara cell population to ciliated and mucin-producing cells is observed in Tg+ mice exposed to asbestos. We also report that molecular markers of fibrogenesis (i.e., procollagens and IL-6 gene expression) are increased in lungs of asbestos-exposed Tg− mice, but not in lungs of Tg+ mice. This study is the first to demonstrate a causal role of the MEK1 cascade in epithelial cell replication and remodeling after lung injury by a pathogenic fiber in vivo. MATERIALS AND METHODS Creation of Transgenic dnMEK1 (Tg+) Mice Inhalation Exposures to Asbestos In duplicate experiments, dnMEK1 transgene positive mice (Tg+) and transgene-negative (Tg−) littermates (n = 3-6/group/time/individual experiments performed in duplicate) were exposed to clean air (sham controls) or crocidolite asbestos (NIEHS reference standard at a concentration of approximately 7 mg asbestos/m3 air for 2, 4, 9, and 32 d) (11). These time points represent peak times of early response protooncogene induction (2 d), distal bronchiolar epithelial cell proliferation (4 d), inflammation and expression of mucin-positive cells (9 d), and fibrogenesis (32 d) in previous inhalation experiments (11, 12). Isolation of Lungs, Histopathology, and Bronchoalveolar Lavage Procedures Ki-67 Immunoperoxidase Staining Paraffin-embedded mouse lung tissue sections were stained using an antibody to Ki-67 and numbers of positively stained cells in distal bronchiolar epithelium evaluated and quantitated as described previously (12). LCM LCM was performed to selectively capture distal bronchioles (restricted to 800 μm in perimeter at ×400 magnification without a smooth muscle peribronchiolar lining) as described previously (11). The captured epithelial cells were extracted for 30 minutes at 42°C in an extraction buffer (Arcturus Engineering, Mountain View, CA) and stored at −80°C until further processing.Quantitative Real-Time PCR Total RNA was extracted from microdissected epithelium or lung tissue using a PicoPure RNA isolation kit (Arcturus) as described in the online supplement. Probes and primers for all genes (see Table E1 in the online supplement), including histone H3, a molecular marker of cell proliferation (13), c-fos, c-jun, MnSOD, and cyclin D1, were used at concentrations of 200 nM and 900 nM, respectively. Reverse Transcription PCR RNA was isolated and reverse transcription performed as described above and in the online supplement. Forward and reverse primers for IL-6, TNFα, procollagen 1-a-1, and procollagen 3-a-1 are described in Table E1. Multifluorescence Studies Using Confocal Scanning Laser Microscopy Lung sections were cut in a cryostat, placed onto glass slides, and stored at −80°C until use. Sections then were fixed in fresh 3% paraformaldehyde for immunohistochemistry using antibodies to Ki-67, CC10, and β-tubulin, a marker of ciliated cells (see online supplement). Antibodies and staining techniques for phosphorylated ERK1/2 have been detailed previously (2, 3). Light Microscopy and Image Analysis Quantitation of ciliated cells and Alcian blue/PAS-positive mucin cells, was performed on distal bronchioles (restricted to 800 μm in perimeter at ×400 magnification and without a surrounding smooth muscle layer), at 4 and 32 days. Ciliated cells were manually counted per total number of bronchiolar epithelial cells on every distal bronchiole in each of two lung sections per mouse. Every distal bronchiole was also scored for the presence or absence of Alcian blue/PAS–positive mucin-containing cells. Image analysis was performed using MetaMorph v6.1 (Universal Imaging, Downingtown, PA).Statistical Analyses All data are graphed as Means ± SEM. Statistical significance was evaluated by ANOVA using the Student-Neuman-Keul's procedure for adjustment of multiple pairwise comparisons between treatment groups or using the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests. Values of P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS Increased Phosphorylation of p-ERK 1/2 Is Not Observed in Bronchiolar Epithelial Cells of dnMEK1 Tg+ Mice To determine whether expression of the dnMEK1 transgene affected ERK1/2 phosphorylation in epithelial cells, we performed immunofluorescence studies on lung tissues. These studies showed that phosphorylated ERK1/2 (pERK1/2) was primarily cytoplasmic in bronchiolar epithelial cells, as reported previously (2, 3), and barely detectable in sham Tg− and Tg+ mice (Figure 1
Increased mRNA Levels of c-fos and histone H3 Occur in Distal Bronchiolar Epithelium of C57/BL6 Mice Exposed to Asbestos We first determined if inhalation of asbestos caused increased expression of the early response protooncogenes c-fos and c-jun, histone H3, and cyclin D1, and the antioxidant enzyme gene, MnSOD or SOD2, in distal bronchiolar epithelial cells, sites of impaction by asbestos fibers (Figures 2A–2C
Cellular and Molecular Markers of Proliferation Reveal Decreased Epithelial Cell Proliferation in Response to Asbestos in dnMEK1 Tg+ Mice We have shown previously that bronchiolar epithelial cell proliferation as measured by incorporation of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) peaks at 4 days in C57BL/6 mice exposed to crocidolite asbestos (11). Thus, we examined proportions of cycling cells in the distal bronchiolar epithelium and peribronchiolar regions of these same bronchioles at 4 days using an antibody for Ki-67 (Figure 3A
Lung Inflammatory Cell Profiles Are Not Altered in Asbestos-Exposed dnMEK1 Tg+ Mice The histopathology of asbestos-exposed lungs in dnMEK1 Tg+ mice and Tg− littermates was similar, reflecting focal inflammation and focal interstitial fibrosis developing at the alveolar duct region (11) at 32 days (data not shown). To eliminate the possibility that epithelial expression of dnMEK1 might affect inflammatory cell influx and profiles in response to asbestos, we next examined inflammatory cell populations in bronchoalveolar lavage fluids (BALF) from mice at 9 days, the time point of peak inflammation in this model (11, 12). Compared with sham air controls, inhalation of asbestos resulted in an increase in total numbers of inflammatory cells in BALF in both dnMEK1 Tg+ and Tg– mice (P 0.05) (Figure 4A
dnMEK1 Tg+ Mice Exhibit Altered Differentiation of Bronchiolar Epithelial Cells after Exposure to Asbestos In the lung, the more distal airway epithelium is composed almost exclusively of Clara cells. Accordingly, fewer than 5% of ciliated cells were observed in the distal bronchiolar epithelium of all mice at 4 days (Figure 5A
To confirm the presence of ciliated cells and their replicative status in distal bronchioles of asbestos-exposed dnMEK1 Tg+ mice, we performed triple fluorescence immunohistochemistry using antibodies to detect β-tubulin, a component of cilia, CCSP, a marker of Clara cells (which by definition are nonciliated) (16), and Ki-67. Multi-fluorescence approaches revealed that in contrast to sham (Tg− and Tg+) or asbestos-exposed Tg− mice (Figure 6A
In comparison to sham controls and asbestos-exposed Tg− mouse lungs, we also noted a larger proportion of Alcian blue–positive mucin-secreting cells in the distal airways of asbestos-exposed dnMEK1 Tg+ mouse lungs at 32 days (Figure 7
Asbestos-Exposed dnMEK1 Tg+ Mice Exhibit Changes in Molecular Indicators of Lung Remodeling at 32 Days Although focal fibrosis is observed in lungs of C57BL/6 mice at 30 days after inhalation of crocidolite asbestos (11), these changes are modest and cannot be measured using quantitative biochemical assays for measurement of hydroxyproline. Therefore, to determine if the fibrotic mediators, IL-6 and TNF-α, and expression of procollagen genes were altered at 32 days in asbestos-exposed Tg+ and Tg− mice, QRT-PCR was performed on whole lung homogenates (Tg− sham mice were used for comparisons here due to the paucity of Tg+ mice). These studies revealed that IL-6 mRNA levels were increased in Tg−, but not dnMEK1 Tg+ mice exposed to asbestos (Figure 8A
DISCUSSION Although MAPKs have been intensely investigated in many cell types in vitro, our studies are the first to examine the functional roles of MEK1/ERK1/2 signaling pathways in lung after inhalation of asbestos. We demonstrate that early epithelial cell proliferation after inhalation of asbestos, a pathogenic agent injuring lung epithelium and causing compensatory hyperplasia (18), is modulated by the MEK1 cascade. Asbestos-exposed dnMEK1 Tg+ mice also exhibit abnormal population of distal bronchioles with differentiated ciliated cells and mucin-producing cells, revealing a previously unrecognized role for the MEK1 pathway in epithelial cell differentiation. Our studies showing that altered differentiation occurs after Day 4 in asbestos-exposed dnMEK1 Tg+ distal bronchioles exhibiting less proliferation suggest that increased mitogenesis is not related directly to increases in ciliated and mucin-producing cells. As suggested in a previous report (17), Clara cells may undergo phenotypic changes, giving rise to mucin-secreting cells and not requiring increased cell proliferation. Our studies suggest that lack of MEK1 after asbestos injury causes increased mucin expression, consistent with observations that MAPKs and changes in AP-1 expression control transcription of mucin genes in differentiated epithelial cells in vitro (reviewed in Reference 19). Moreover, the MEK1 pathway has been linked to inhibition of differentiation of human small airway epithelial cells to cells expressing CCSP after exposure to an active metabolite of benzo(a)pyrene (20). The fact that attenuation of MEK1 modulates both asbestos-induced epithelial cell proliferation and differentiation suggests that signaling through MEK1 is crucial for determining the fate of epithelial cells in vivo after injury. However, results do not preclude the possibility that chronic MEK1 epithelial inhibition may also impact responsiveness to inhaled asbestos fibers. Activation of ERK1/2 signaling has been shown to be important in normal and tumor cell proliferation induced by growth factors and oxidative stress (21, 22). In bronchiolar epithelial cells in vivo and in vitro, asbestos stimulates proliferation, which may be coupled to repair after initial injury by asbestos (2, 3, 22). Moreover, phosphorylated or activated ERK1/2 is observed in bronchiolar epithelium after inhalation of asbestos (2, 3). Using the small molecule MEK1 inhibitor, PD98059, we have shown that crocidolite asbestos stimulates cell cycle progression and proliferation in C10 cells in an ERK1/2-dependent manner (22). Our study here confirms a functional role of ERK1/2 signaling in mitogenesis of bronchiolar epithelium in vivo. The lack of complete inhibition of asbestos-induced epithelial cell proliferation in dnMEK1 Tg+ mice is consistent with published work showing that other transcription factors and cell survival pathways, such as NF-κB and P13K/Akt, are induced by asbestos and are operative in these mice (14, 15). One possible mechanism by which ERK1/2 activation promotes cell proliferation is by induction of c-fos, a protooncogene encoding c-Fos, a component of the AP-1 transcription factor (23, 24). We show here that inhalation of asbestos causes early up-regulation of c-fos in distal bronchiolar epithelium before the advent of asbestos-associated increases in cell proliferation. Active ERK1/2 phosphorylates the Elk-1 transcription factor, a member of the ternary complex factor (TCF) group of transcription factors (23, 24). In turn, the TCF binds to the serum response element (SRE) of the c-fos promoter, resulting in increased expression of c-Fos protein. Because Fos-Jun heterodimers are more stable than Jun-Jun homodimers, increased expression of c-Fos results in higher AP-1 activity (24). In addition, we have shown that expression of c-Fos–related antigen or Fra-1 is ERK1/2 dependent and critical to transformation of pleural mesothelial cells, presumably by modulating expression of genes such as c-met and cd44 (25). The present work is the first to implicate the MEK1/ERK1/2 pathway in control of epithelial cell differentiation and remodeling after lung injury in vivo. In a number of in vitro studies, ERK1/2 activity can promote either a differentiated or dedifferentiated phenotype depending upon the cell type involved. For example, in canine kidney epithelial cells (MDCK-C7), constitutive activation of ERK1/2 signaling results in an invasive, less-differentiated, myofibroblast-like state (26). Upon reversal of constitutive activation of ERK1/2 signaling, the cells re-differentiate to epithelial cells. Inhibition of ERK1/2 signaling using the MEK1/2 small molecule inhibitor, U0126, also results in a decrease in branching morphogenesis in fetal lung explants (27). MEK1 is essential for normal thymocyte development, but MEK2 appears to be dispensable for normal embryonic development and thymocyte maturation, suggesting that MEK1 can compensate for a loss in MEK2 function (6). The fact that epithelial cell and lung remodeling are altered after inhibition of the MEK1 pathway in asbestos-exposed mice is consistent with our recent observation that dnMEK1 Tg+ mice crossed with IL-13–overexpressing mice show inhibition of IL-13–induced inflammation and alveolar remodeling as measured by decreases in IL-13–associated cytokines, cathepsin B, and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs 2, 9, 12, and 14) (7). Whether epithelial cells play a crucial role in the development of asbestos-induced lung remodeling and pulmonary fibrosis is a question of intense debate and under scrutiny because of potential therapeutic ramifications of targeting epithelial cells. Moreover, diagnosis of pulmonary fibrosis is associated with a poor prognosis, and anti-inflammatory therapies have been generally ineffective and disappointing. Although only focal increases in fibrosis are observed histologically in mouse lungs after 32 days of exposure to crocidolite asbestos, message levels of IL-6 and procollagens increased in lungs at this time point but were decreased significantly in asbestos-exposed dnMEK1 Tg+ mice (Figure 8 Acknowledgments The authors acknowledge Mary Lou Shane and Tim Hunter from the Vermont Cancer Center DNA Analysis Facility for providing support for QRT-PCR studies. Dr. Mary Gulumian from the National Center of Occupational Health (Johannesburg, South Africa) kindly supplied the sample of crocidolite asbestos for inhalation studies. Laurie Sabens, Beth Langford-Corrigan, and Jennifer Díaz provided valuable assistance in the preparation of this manuscript. Technical assistance in these studies was provided by Stacie Beuschel, Linda Weiss, Nikol A. Manning, Arti Shukla, Maria Ramos-Nino, Justin Robbins, and Masha Stern. The authors acknowledge Dr. Barry Stripp (University of Pittsburgh) and Dr. Francesco DeMayo (Baylor College of Medicine) for providing antibodies to CCSP, and Dr. Jeffrey Whitsett (Children's Hospital of Cincinnati) for supplying the CC10 construct. Notes This research was funded by grants P01 HL67004 from National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and T32 07122 from National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (to B.T.M.). This article has an online supplement, which is accessible from this issue's table of contents at www.atsjournals.org Originally Published in Press as DOI: 10.1165/rcmb.2007-0382OC on January 10, 2008 Conflict of Interest Statement: None of the authors has a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of this manuscript. References 1. Mossman B, Bignon J, Corn M, Seaton A, Gee J. Asbestos: scientific developments and implications for public policy. Science 1990;247:294–301. [PubMed] 2. Robledo R, Buder-Hoffmann S, Cummins A, Walsh E, Taatjes D, Mossman B. Increased phosphorylated ERK immunoreactivity associated with proliferative and morphologic lung alterations following chrysotile asbestos inhalation in mice. Am J Pathol 2000;156:1307–1316. [PubMed] 3. Cummins AB, Palmer C, Mossman BT, Taatjes DJ. Persistent localization of activated extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERK1/2) is epithelial cell-specific in an inhalation model of asbestosis. Am J Pathol 2003;162:713–720. [PubMed] 4. Vantaggiato C, Formentini I, Bondanza A, Bonini C, Naldini L, Brambilla R. ERK1 and ERK2 mitogen-activated protein kinases affect Ras-dependent cell signaling differentially. J Biol 2006;5:14. [PubMed] 5. Wang Y, Prywes R. Activation of the c-fos enhancer by the ERK MAP kinase pathway through two sequence elements: the c-fos AP-1 and p62TCF sites. Oncogene 2000;19:1379–1385. [PubMed] 6. Pages G, Guerin S, Grall D, Bonino F, Smith A, Anjuere F, Auberger P, Pouyssegur J. Defective thymocyte maturation in p44 MAP kinase (ERK 1) knockout mice. Science 1999;286:1374–1377. [PubMed] 7. Lee PJ, Zhang X, Shan P, Ma B, Lee CG, Homer RJ, Zhu Z, Rincon M, Mossman BT, Elias JA. ERK1/2 mitogen-activated protein kinase selectively mediates IL-13-induced lung inflammation and remodeling in vivo. J Clin Invest 2006;116:163–173. [PubMed] 8. Janssen Y, Marsh J, Driscoll K, Borm P, Oberdorster G, Mossman B. Increased expression of manganese-containing superoxide dismutase in rat lungs after inhalation of inflammatory and fibrogenic minerals. Free Radic Biol Med 1994;16:315–322. [PubMed] 9. Stripp BR, Sawaya PL, Luse DS, Wikenheiser KA, Wert SE, Huffman JA, Lattier DL, Singh G, Katyal SL, Whitsett JA. Cis-acting elements that confer lung epithelial cell expression of the CC10 gene. J Biol Chem 1992;267:14703–14712. [PubMed] 10. Alessandrini A, Greulich H, Huang W, Erikson RL. MEK1 phosphorylation site mutants activate Raf-1 in NIH 3T3 cells. J Biol Chem 1996;271:31612–31618. [PubMed] 11. Manning C, Cummins A, Jung M, Berlanger I, Timblin C, Palmer C, Taatjes D, Hemenway D, Vacek P, Mossman B. A mutant epidermal growth factor receptor targeted to lung epithelium inhibits asbestos-induced proliferation and proto-oncogene expression. Cancer Res 2002;62:4169–4175. [PubMed] 12. Sabo-Attwood T, Ramos-Nino M, Bond J, Butnor KJ, Heintz N, Gruber AD, Steele C, Taatjes DJ, Vacek P, Mossman BT. Gene expression profiles reveal increased mClca3 (Gob5) expression and mucin production in a murine model of asbestos-induced fibrogenesis. Am J Pathol 2005;167:1243–1256. [PubMed] 13. Alterman RB, Ganguly S, Schulze DH, Marzluff WF, Schildkraut CL, Skoultchi AI. Cell cycle regulation of mouse H3 histone mRNA metabolism. Mol Cell Biol 1984;4:123–132. [PubMed] 14. Janssen Y, Barchowsky A, Treadwell M, Driscoll K, Mossman B. Asbestos induces nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kappa B) DNA-binding activity and NF-kappa B-dependent gene expression in tracheal epithelial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995;92:8458–8462. [PubMed] 15. Ramos-Nino ME, Vianale G, Sabo-Attwood T, Mutti L, Porta C, Heintz N, Mossman BT. Human mesothelioma cells exhibit tumor cell-specific differences in phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/AKT activity that predict the efficacy of Onconase. Mol Cancer Ther 2005;4:835–842. [PubMed] 16. Broeckaert F, Bernard A. Clara cell secretory protein (CC16): characteristics and perspectives as lung peripheral biomarker. Clin Exp Allergy 2000;30:469–475. [PubMed] 17. Evans CM, Williams OW, Tuvim MJ, Nigam R, Mixides GP, Blackburn MR, DeMayo FJ, Burns AR, Smith C, Reynolds SD, et al. Mucin is produced by clara cells in the proximal airways of antigen-challenged mice. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2004;31:382–394. [PubMed] 18. Mossman BT, Craighead JE, MacPherson BV. Asbestos-induced epithelial changes in organ cultures of hamster trachea: inhibition by retinyl methyl ether. Science 1980;207:311–313. [PubMed] 19. Mossman BT, Lounsbury KM, Reddy SP. Oxidants and signaling by mitogen-activated protein kinases in lung epithelium. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2006;34:666–669. [PubMed] 20. Jyonouchi H, Sun S, Iijima K, Wang M, Hecht SS. Effects of anti-7,8-dihydroxy-9,10-epoxy-7,8,9,10-tetrahydrobenzo[a]pyrene on human small airway epithelial cells and the protective effects of myo-inositol. Carcinogenesis 1999;20:139–145. [PubMed] 21. Blanc A, Pandey NR, Srivastava AK. Synchronous activation of ERK 1/2, p38 MAPK and PKB/Akt signaling by H2O2 in vascular smooth muscle cells: potential involvement in vascular disease. Int J Mol Med 2003;11:229–234. (review). [PubMed] 22. Buder-Hoffmann S, Palmer C, Vacek P, Taatjes D, Mossman B. Different accumulation of activated extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERK 1/2) and role in cell-cycle alterations by epidermal growth factor, hydrogen peroxide, or asbestos in pulmonary epithelial cells. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2001;24:405–413. [PubMed] 23. Babu GJ, Lalli MJ, Sussman MA, Sadoshima J, Periasamy M. Phosphorylation of elk-1 by MEK/ERK pathway is necessary for c-fos gene activation during cardiac myocyte hypertrophy. J Mol Cell Cardiol 2000;32:1447–1457. [PubMed] 24. Reddy SP, Mossman BT. Role and regulation of activator protein-1 in toxicant-induced responses of the lung. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2002;283:L1161–L1178. [PubMed] 25. Ramos-Nino ME, Scapoli L, Martinelli M, Land S, Mossman BT. Microarray analysis and RNA silencing link fra-1 to cd44 and c-met expression in mesothelioma. Cancer Res 2003;63:3539–3545. [PubMed] 26. Schramek H, Feifel E, Marschitz I, Golochtchapova N, Gstraunthaler G, Montesano R. Loss of active MEK1-ERK1/2 restores epithelial phenotype and morphogenesis in transdifferentiated MDCK cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2003;285:C652–C661. [PubMed] 27. Kling DE, Lorenzo HK, Trbovich AM, Kinane TB, Donahoe PK, Schnitzer JJ. MEK-1/2 inhibition reduces branching morphogenesis and causes mesenchymal cell apoptosis in fetal rat lungs. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2002;282:L370–L378. [PubMed] 28. Simeonova PP, Toriumi W, Kommineni C, Erkan M, Munson AE, Rom WN, Luster MI. Molecular regulation of IL-6 activation by asbestos in lung epithelial cells: role of reactive oxygen species. J Immunol 1997;159:3921–3928. [PubMed] 29. Mossman B, Churg A. State-of-the-art: mechanisms in the pathogenesis of asbestosis and silicosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998;157:1666–1680. [PubMed] 30. Liu JY, Brody AR. Increased TGF-beta1 in the lungs of asbestos-exposed rats and mice: reduced expression in TNF-alpha receptor knockout mice. J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol 2001;20:97–108. [PubMed] 31. Cho HY, Morgan DL, Bauer AK, Kleeberger SR. Signal transduction pathways of tumor necrosis factor–mediated lung injury induced by ozone in mice. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2007;175:829–839. [PubMed] 32. Sullivan DE, Ferris M, Pociask D, Brody AR. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha induces transforming growth factor-beta1 expression in lung fibroblasts through the extracellular signal-regulated kinase pathway. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2005;32:342–349. [PubMed] 33. Fernandez-Serra M, Consales C, Livigni A, Arnone MI. Role of the ERK-mediated signaling pathway in mesenchyme formation and differentiation in the sea urchin embryo. Dev Biol 2004;268:384–402. [PubMed] |
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Science. 1990 Jan 19; 247(4940):294-301.
[Science. 1990]Am J Pathol. 2000 Apr; 156(4):1307-16.
[Am J Pathol. 2000]Am J Pathol. 2003 Mar; 162(3):713-20.
[Am J Pathol. 2003]J Biol. 2006; 5(5):14.
[J Biol. 2006]Oncogene. 2000 Mar 9; 19(11):1379-85.
[Oncogene. 2000]Free Radic Biol Med. 1994 Mar; 16(3):315-22.
[Free Radic Biol Med. 1994]J Biol Chem. 1992 Jul 25; 267(21):14703-12.
[J Biol Chem. 1992]J Biol Chem. 1992 Jul 25; 267(21):14703-12.
[J Biol Chem. 1992]J Biol Chem. 1996 Dec 6; 271(49):31612-8.
[J Biol Chem. 1996]J Clin Invest. 2006 Jan; 116(1):163-73.
[J Clin Invest. 2006]Cancer Res. 2002 Aug 1; 62(15):4169-75.
[Cancer Res. 2002]Am J Pathol. 2005 Nov; 167(5):1243-56.
[Am J Pathol. 2005]Cancer Res. 2002 Aug 1; 62(15):4169-75.
[Cancer Res. 2002]Am J Pathol. 2005 Nov; 167(5):1243-56.
[Am J Pathol. 2005]Am J Pathol. 2005 Nov; 167(5):1243-56.
[Am J Pathol. 2005]Cancer Res. 2002 Aug 1; 62(15):4169-75.
[Cancer Res. 2002]Mol Cell Biol. 1984 Jan; 4(1):123-32.
[Mol Cell Biol. 1984]Am J Pathol. 2000 Apr; 156(4):1307-16.
[Am J Pathol. 2000]Am J Pathol. 2003 Mar; 162(3):713-20.
[Am J Pathol. 2003]Am J Pathol. 2000 Apr; 156(4):1307-16.
[Am J Pathol. 2000]Am J Pathol. 2003 Mar; 162(3):713-20.
[Am J Pathol. 2003]Cancer Res. 2002 Aug 1; 62(15):4169-75.
[Cancer Res. 2002]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Aug 29; 92(18):8458-62.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995]Mol Cancer Ther. 2005 May; 4(5):835-42.
[Mol Cancer Ther. 2005]Cancer Res. 2002 Aug 1; 62(15):4169-75.
[Cancer Res. 2002]Am J Pathol. 2005 Nov; 167(5):1243-56.
[Am J Pathol. 2005]Clin Exp Allergy. 2000 Apr; 30(4):469-75.
[Clin Exp Allergy. 2000]Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2004 Oct; 31(4):382-94.
[Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2004]Cancer Res. 2002 Aug 1; 62(15):4169-75.
[Cancer Res. 2002]Science. 1980 Jan 18; 207(4428):311-3.
[Science. 1980]Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2004 Oct; 31(4):382-94.
[Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2004]Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2006 Jun; 34(6):666-9.
[Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2006]Carcinogenesis. 1999 Jan; 20(1):139-45.
[Carcinogenesis. 1999]Int J Mol Med. 2003 Feb; 11(2):229-34.
[Int J Mol Med. 2003]Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2001 Apr; 24(4):405-13.
[Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2001]Am J Pathol. 2000 Apr; 156(4):1307-16.
[Am J Pathol. 2000]Am J Pathol. 2003 Mar; 162(3):713-20.
[Am J Pathol. 2003]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Aug 29; 92(18):8458-62.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995]J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2000 Aug; 32(8):1447-57.
[J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2000]Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2002 Dec; 283(6):L1161-78.
[Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2002]Cancer Res. 2003 Jul 1; 63(13):3539-45.
[Cancer Res. 2003]Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2003 Sep; 285(3):C652-61.
[Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2003]Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2002 Mar; 282(3):L370-8.
[Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2002]Science. 1999 Nov 12; 286(5443):1374-7.
[Science. 1999]J Clin Invest. 2006 Jan; 116(1):163-73.
[J Clin Invest. 2006]J Immunol. 1997 Oct 15; 159(8):3921-8.
[J Immunol. 1997]Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998 May; 157(5 Pt 1):1666-80.
[Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998]Am J Pathol. 2005 Nov; 167(5):1243-56.
[Am J Pathol. 2005]J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol. 2001; 20(2):97-108.
[J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol. 2001]