![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2008, American Society of Plant Biologists Mild Reductions in Mitochondrial Citrate Synthase Activity Result in a Compromised Nitrate Assimilation and Reduced Leaf Pigmentation But Have No Effect on Photosynthetic Performance or Growth1[W] Max-Planck-Institut für Molekulare Pflanzenphysiologie, 14476 Golm, Germany (A.S.-P., A.N.-N., R.S., J.L., D.C.C., A.L., E.U.-W., A.R.F.); and Dipartimento di Scienze della Vita, Seconda Università degli Studi di Napoli, Via Vivaldi, 43 I–81100 Caserta, Italy (P.C.) *Corresponding author; e-mail fernie/at/mpimp-golm.mpg.de. Received February 18, 2008; Accepted March 16, 2008. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract Transgenic tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) plants, expressing a fragment of the mitochondrial citrate synthase gene in the antisense orientation and exhibiting mild reductions in the total cellular activity of this enzyme, displayed essentially no visible phenotypic alteration from the wild type. A more detailed physiological characterization, however, revealed that although these plants were characterized by relatively few changes in photosynthetic parameters they displayed a decreased relative flux through the tricarboxylic acid cycle and an increased rate of respiration. Furthermore, biochemical analyses revealed that the transformants exhibited considerably altered metabolism, being characterized by slight decreases in the levels of organic acids of the tricarboxylic acid cycle, photosynthetic pigments, and in a single line in protein content but increases in the levels of nitrate, several amino acids, and starch. We additionally determined the maximal catalytic activities of a wide range of enzymes of primary metabolism, performed targeted quantitative PCR analysis on all three isoforms of citrate synthase, and conducted a broader transcript profiling using the TOM1 microarray. Results from these studies confirmed that if the lines were somewhat impaired in nitrate assimilation, they were not severely affected by this, suggesting the presence of strategies by which metabolism is reprogrammed to compensate for this deficiency. The results are discussed in the context of carbon-nitrogen interaction and interorganellar coordination of metabolism. Citrate synthase catalyses the condensation reaction occurring between the four-carbon oxaloacetate molecule and the two-carbon acetyl-CoA molecule and is often regarded as the first committed step of the tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA; Landschütze et al., 1995a, 1995b; Fernie et al., 2004). Despite the strategic positional importance of this enzyme, studies that have investigated its metabolic importance in plants remain at a premium (Scheible et al., 2000; Bläsing et al., 2005; Pracharoenwattana et al., 2005; Urbanczyk-Wochniak et al., 2006). That said, many focused studies have been directed on the role of this pathway in plant soil interactions. In this context, citrate synthase has been fiercely debated as an important determinant of root citrate exudation (Delhaize et al., 2001; Kochian et al., 2004), and as such as an important mediator of both phosphate uptake and aluminum tolerance (de la Fuente et al., 1997; Anoop et al., 2003). Moreover, a role for citrate synthase has been postulated in the process of floral development (Landschütze et al., 1995b; Yui et al., 2003). Although these studies have greatly enhanced our understanding of the role of citrate synthase in specific developmental and environmental interactions, they provide little information concerning the general role of isoforms of this enzyme in the regulation of plant respiration. In recent years much research effort has been expended on elucidating the metabolic and physiological functions of the various isoforms of isocitrate dehydrogenase (Galvez et al., 1994; Hodges et al., 2003). In contrast, directed studies, such as those described above, but concerning the metabolic role of citrate synthase are rare (Pracharoenwattana et al., 2005) and do not directly concern the mitochondrial isoform. Despite this fact, studies at the pathway level have provided many interesting insights into the contribution of this isoform in, for example, the regulation of the nitrate assimilation pathway in the illuminated leaf. Such studies have predominantly been focused on the levels of the metabolic intermediates and mRNA levels of enzymes of the pathways in question (Scheible et al., 2000). However, the recent widespread adoption of genomic and postgenomic technologies has facilitated systematic analysis of the global response of metabolism to cellular circumstance (Bläsing et al., 2005; Urbanczyk-Wochniak et al., 2006; www.genevestigator.ethz.ch), facilitating evaluation of cross-pathway, or even network responses, at both the transcript and metabolite level. As part of our own ongoing project to determine the function of the TCA cycle in the illuminated leaves, we have, thus far, characterized the Aco1 tomato (Solanum pennellii) mutant deficient in aconitase expression (Carrari et al., 2003), as well as transgenics of the cultivated tomato deficient in the expression of the mitochondrial isoforms of malate dehydrogenase (Nunes-Nesi et al., 2005), fumarase (Nunes-Nesi et al., 2007), and succinyl-CoA ligase (Studart-Guimarães et al., 2007). These genetic studies have generally corroborated those based on the use of mitochondrial inhibitors (for review, see Raghavendra and Padmasree, 2003; Sweetlove et al., 2007), in demonstrating a role for mitochondria in optimizing photosynthesis and are additionally in keeping with results from the analysis of plant genotypes directly affected in activities of proteins associated with normal functioning of the mitochondrial electron transport chain (see Sweetlove et al., [2007] for details). It is, however, worth noting that the characterization of manipulations of the TCA cycle revealed mixed results when addressed from the perspective of cellular metabolism in general. Intriguingly, manipulation of aconitase, fumarase, and the mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase appeared to have greater consequence than that of the mitochondrial reactions catalyzed by succinyl-CoA ligase and isocitrate dehydrogenase (Nunes-Nesi et al., 2005, 2007; Lemaitre et al., 2007; Studart-Guimarães et al., 2007). The former three manipulations displayed clear effects on the rate of both photosynthesis and respiration (Carrari et al., 2003; Nunes-Nesi et al., 2005, 2007), whereas the later two displayed no obvious physiological effects under optimized growth conditions (Lemaitre et al., 2007; Studart-Guimarães et al., 2007). In this study, we turn our attention to the evaluation of the importance of the mitochondrial citrate synthase—often described as the first committed step of the TCA cycle—for metabolism in the illuminated leaf. To continue our ongoing project to determine the function of the TCA cycle in the illuminated leaf we describe here the generation of transgenic plants exhibiting mild decreases in the expression of the mitochondrial isoform of citrate synthase. The transgenic lines generated were comprehensively characterized at biochemical, physiological, and transcriptional levels. Data accumulated in this study are discussed in terms of current models concerning the importance of the TCA cycle in the illuminated leaf as well as the coordination of plant carbon and nitrogen metabolism. RESULTS Cloning of a cDNA Encoding Mitochondrial Citrate Synthase from Tomato Searching tomato EST collections (Van der Hoeven et al., 2003) revealed the presence of 17 ESTs encoding mitochondrial citrate synthase (mCS), all of which belonged to a single tentative consensus (TC180568) sequence. Assembly and sequence analysis of this gene revealed an open reading frame of 470 amino acids. Comparison with functionally characterized citrate synthases revealed 91% identity to potato (Solanum tuberosum; Q43175), 85% to Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) CSY4 (At2g44350), 83% identity to Arabidopsis CSY5 (At3g60100), 56% identity to Saccharomyces cerevisiae Cit1p (NP_014398), 54% Cit2p (NP_009931), and 45% identity to S. cerevisiae Cit3p (NP_015325), which are all mitochondrial isoforms but a much lower identity (<30%) to peroxisomal isoforms (Fig. 1A
Transgenic Plants Show Little Change in Growth Rate, Time of Flowering, or Fruit Set A 1,195-bp fragment of the cDNA encoding mCS was cloned in antisense orientation between the cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) promoter and the ocs terminator (Fig. 1B As a first experiment we grew the transgenic plants in the greenhouse side by side with wild-type controls. No clear difference could be observed in the growth of aerial parts of the plant (exemplified in Fig. 2A
Respiratory Parameters in the Transgenic Lines Given the above indication of an altered respiration in darkened leaves we next studied respiratory fluxes in the illuminated leaf. For this purpose we adopted two strategies. First, we recorded the evolution of 14CO2 following incubation of leaf discs in positionally labeled 14C-Glc molecules, and secondly we performed gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis on extracts from leaf discs following incubation in 20 mm 13C-sodium pyruvate. In the first experiment, we incubated leaf discs taken from plants in the light and supplied these with [1-14C], [2-14C], [3,4-14C], or [6-14C]Glc over a period of 6 h. During this time, we collected the 14CO2 evolved at hourly intervals. Carbon dioxide can be released from the C1 position by the action of the enzymes that are not associated with mitochondrial respiration, but carbon dioxide evolution from the C3:4 positions of Glc cannot (ap Rees and Beevers, 1960). Thus, the ratio of carbon dioxide evolution from C1 to C3:4 provides an indication of the relative rate of the TCA cycle with respect to the other processes of carbohydrate oxidation. When the relative rate of 14CO2 evolution of the transgenic and wild-type lines is compared for the various substrates an interesting picture emerges (Fig. 3A
Changes in Primary Carbon Metabolism in the Transformants Analysis of the carbohydrate content of leaves from 6-week-old plants during a diurnal cycle revealed that the transformants were characterized by increases in the levels of Glc, Fru, Suc, and starch; however, due to the previously reported high variance in the levels of these metabolites in this species (Studart-Guimarães et al., 2007), these increases were not significant (data not shown). We next extended these studies, to encompass other major pathways of primary metabolism, by utilizing an established GC-MS protocol for metabolic profiling that facilitates the quantification of some 70 metabolites (Fernie et al., 2004). The full data set (Fig. 4, A and B
Evaluation of Diurnal Changes in Amino Acid Levels Given that there is considerable diurnal variation in the levels of amino acids, we next evaluated whether this was altered in the transgenics. For this purpose we collected samples at five different time points during a 24-h cycle and determined the amino acid levels by HPLC. Using this method allowed us to evaluate the behavior of nine of the amino acids in the wild type and in lines CS40 and CS22 (Fig. 5
Effect of Reduction of Mitochondrial Citrate Synthase on the Activities of Other Enzymes of Primary Metabolism Because some of the changes in metabolites described above were contrary to what had been expected, we next analyzed the maximal catalytic activities of a wide range of important enzymes of photosynthetic carbon metabolism (Table I). The transgenic lines were characterized by changes in a wide range of these enzymes displaying clear decreases in AGPase (in three of the four transgenics), cytosolic Fru-1,6-bisphosphatase, Gln synthetase, the NADP-dependent isoform of isocitrate dehydrogenase, and nitrate reductase (in all lines), and both initial and total activities of NADP-dependent malate dehydrogenase (in the most strongly inhibited lines—CS22 and CS40). In contrast, the levels of acid invertase increased in line CS45, however, changes in these activities were not consistent with the change in citrate synthase activity indicating that they were most likely a pleiotropic effect. Activities of fructokinase, hexokinase, Glc-6-P dehydrogenase, NAD-isocitrate dehydrogenase, ATP-dependent phosphofructokinase, and succinyl-CoA ligase were invariant across the lines (Supplemental Table S1).
Nitrate Content in the Transgenic Lines Given that some of the changes in amino acid metabolism reported above were somewhat unexpected we thought it prudent to directly check the leaf nitrate content. For this reason we spectrophotometrically assayed this. These assays revealed that the transgenics reproducibly contained up to 5- to 6-fold increases in the content of the ion (2.34 ± 0.35, 11.80 ± 3.87, 14.37 ± 4.01, 4.54 ± 1.24, and 4.68 ± 1.48 μmol g−1 fresh weight for wild type, CS22, CS40, CS25, and CS45, respectively), and are in keeping with the observed reduction in the activities of enzymes associated with nitrate assimilation documented above. Furthermore, when considered alongside the total leaf nitrogen content, these data reveal that the lines are not deficient in the transport of nitrate but merely in its utilization. Pigment Contents in the Transgenic Lines Given the above results we next decided to evaluate the levels of the photosynthetic pigments because these compounds have often been reported as important indicators of nitrogen deficiencies (Gaude et al., 2007). HPLC analysis revealed that chlorophyll a and b were both significantly reduced in the transformants as were β-carotene, violaxanthin, and neoxanthin (in all cases these changes were significant in at least three of the transgenic lines; Fig. 6
Expression Levels of Other Isoforms of Citrate Synthase and Other Genes To understand the failure to detect a decreased rate of respiration in the transformants, we next evaluated the expression of isoforms of citrate synthase using an established quantitative reverse transcription (RT)-PCR protocol (Czechowski et al., 2004). This revealed that while one of the peroxisomal isoforms was invariant across the genotypes the other was markedly increased (Fig. 7
There are, however, at least some inconsistencies when the microarray results are compared at the single gene level to the changes in enzyme activities reported above. While, as would perhaps be expected, the transcript levels of the high-affinity nitrate transporter and of several genes encoding enzymes of glycolysis decreased, surprisingly the expression of Glu synthetase and the NADH-dependent Glu dehydrogenase were over 2-fold increased. That said the NADH-dependent GOGAT was abundant at significantly lower transcript levels in the transformant. Moreover, it is important to note that the TOM1 array offers far less than full-genome coverage and thus other important isoforms of any enzyme in question could be absent from the chip. Analysis of transcripts associated with regulation revealed two further interesting changes, namely altered expression of the bHLH and Dof finger transcription factor families, both of which have previously been characterized in the regulation of nitrogen assimilation (Yanagisawa, 2004; Lea et al., 2007). However, caution is needed in interpreting these findings given recent studies indicating the lack of a linear relationship between transcript response and cellular protein levels (Gibon et al., 2004). DISCUSSION Much recent research into plant photosynthetic energy metabolism has revealed an important functional role for respiratory metabolism in the illuminated leaf. The results of biochemical (Raghavendra and Padmasree, 2003), light environmental (Igamberdiev et al., 2001), and genetic (Bartoli et al., 2005; Sweetlove et al., 2006) manipulation of components of the mitochondrial electron transport chain indicate that its correct functioning is required to sustain optimal rates of photosynthesis. More recently both forward and reverse genetic strategies have revealed that manipulation in several activities of the TCA cycle also display a clear photosynthetic phenotype with deficiencies in aconitase or the mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase resulting in elevated rates of photosynthesis (Carrari et al., 2003; Nunes-Nesi et al., 2005) whereas that in fumarase resulted in a severe repression of photosynthesis (Nunes-Nesi et al., 2007). In contrast, the antisense citrate synthase plants described here displayed largely unaltered rates of photosynthesis, despite showing clear alterations in metabolism, suggesting that the cell can compensate the decreased mitochondrial citrate synthase expression in the transformants. In light of this fact it is quite surprising that we were only able to recover plants with such mild reductions in activity (particularly when it is considered that Landschütze et al. [1995b] were able to produce transgenic potato with a mere 6% rest activity). Although it is possible that the peroxisomal citrate synthase provides a higher contribution to the total activity in the tomato than the potato, this seems unlikely to account for such a large discrepancy in the degree of inhibition. We also cannot exclude a threshold level of citrate synthase below which tomato could not regenerate, however, we think this improbable. A further possibility would be that there is a second, as yet unidentified, mitochondrial isoform of citrate synthase in tomato. However, the extreme similarity of the tomato and potato genomes does not support this hypothesis. Given these arguments, the hypothesis we favor is that the difference is most likely due to the relative effectiveness of the antisense inhibition itself. The results presented here also suggest an up-regulation of peroxisomal citrate synthase so it is possible that this up-regulation masks some of the down-regulation of the mitochondrial isoform. This up-regulated expression is able to compensate, at least in part, for the deficiency of mitochondrial citrate synthase. In such a scenario, citrate produced during operation of the glyoxylate cycle could either be further metabolism within the peroxisome or exported and subsequently taken up into the mitochondria, either in the form of citrate or isocitrate, in counterexchange for oxaloacetate via the operation of a previously characterized carboxylic acid transporter (Picault et al., 2002). It is possible that the oxaloacetate exported from the mitochondria could subsequently be taken up by the peroxisome to maintain the activity of the peroxisomal citrate synthase. However, whether this occurs in vivo, or if it is rather first converted to Asp before import, remains contentious (Mettler and Beevers, 1980; Pracharoenwattana et al., 2005). Regardless of the exact substrate imported into the peroxisome there is considerable evidence for strong coordination of metabolism between peroxisomal and mitochondrial processes that extends beyond their combined operation in pathways, such as photorespiration, which are shared between multiple organelles. The results we present here concerning plants deficient in mitochondrial citrate synthase are consistent with those of other laboratories in demonstrating a clear role for the peroxisomal production of citrate, in conjuncture with the operation of the mitochondrial TCA cycle, in respiration of acetyl units from peroxisomal β-oxidation of fatty acids (Raymond et al., 1992; Hooks, 2002; Pracharoenwattana et al., 2005). They also help to explain previous observations that peroxisomal citrate synthase activity is detected in a wide range of tissues and not only those in which the glyoxylate cycle is active (Cornah and Smith, 2002; Pracharoenwattana et al., 2005). Although the restriction in mitochondrial citrate synthase activity had no major consequences on growth or plant physiology, it did result in considerable shifts in metabolism. Most dramatic among these was the concerted down-regulation of enzymes of nitrate assimilation. Analysis of mRNA levels by microarray revealed that several transcripts associated with nitrogen metabolism were repressed; however, this trend was not universal suggesting that the reduction in nitrate assimilation was, at least in part, mediated at the posttranslational level. Evaluation of steady-state metabolite levels were, by and large, in keeping with a restriction in nitrate assimilation. First, the level of nitrate was elevated in the transgenic lines, although it should be noted that the total leaf nitrogen content was unaltered in the transgenics. Secondly, the levels of several amino acids were reduced in the transformants. Thirdly, the increased levels of starch and soluble carbohydrates and the decreased levels of photosynthetic pigments observed in the transformants are diagnostic of a reduced rate of nitrate assimilation (Fritz et al., 2006; Gaude et al., 2007). That said, despite the clear restriction in nitrate assimilation, the levels of both Asn and Gln were significantly increased in the transformants described here. The increase of these metabolites under nitrate limitation is not without precedence since Orsel et al. (2006) recently reported a similar observation in Arabidopsis. Analysis of changes in the diurnal levels of Asn and Gln revealed that they were less different at the end of the dark period—a fact that supports our hypothesis that these differences are somehow related to the changes in nitrate assimilation seen in these lines. Furthermore our data, when taken together, would seem to suggest that this increase may be due, at least in part, to an increased protein degradation and differential amino acid mobilization within the transformants. For instance, there is a clear up-regulation of genes associated with protein degradation in the transformants (see Supplemental Fig. S2) and in the rate of metabolism of the high-nitrogen amino acids (data not shown), suggesting that the lines may well exhibit altered rates of protein turnover. Contrary to this argument is the fact that the steady-state protein levels did not greatly vary in the lines. The changes in metabolism observed in these lines are highly interesting because they show an accumulation of soluble compounds with high-energy storage capacity suggesting that the cell adjusts for the lack of mitochondrial citrate synthase activity by accumulating slightly less long-term energy stores such as protein and chlorophyll. Indeed, many aspects of the metabolite profiles of the mitochondrial citrate synthase plants, including the accumulation of Gln and Asn, are reminiscent of those reported during extended night treatment or even during dark-induced senescence (Ishizaki et al., 2005; Gibon et al., 2006; Fahnenstich et al., 2007). The recorded reduction in flux through mitochondrial steps of the TCA cycle could also be anticipated to lead to a reduced mitochondrial ATP and NAD(P)H production. Although we did not measure the latter and the steady-state levels of the former were unaltered, this postulate may additionally explain the severe apparent decrease in the in vivo activity of nitrate reductase since both ADP and NAD have been reported to inhibit the activity of this enzyme in vitro (Campbell and Smarrelli, 1978; Maldonado et al., 1978). Furthermore, the fact that the nitrate accumulation was so pronounced whereas the reduction in nitrate reductase activity seen here was relatively mild suggests that it is likely that such posttranslational regulation is taking place here. In addition the data described here provide several insights concerning both the coordination of respiration in the illuminated leaf and the importance of the mitochondrial citrate synthase in the mediation of carbon-nitrogen interactions. Although it is clear that the relatively mild decrease in mitochondrial citrate synthase activity has dramatic consequences on both the rate of nitrate assimilation and the rate of flux through the TCA cycle, the effects of this repression cannot be seen in the steady-state levels of the high-nitrogen amino acids Asn and Gln, suggesting that the cell can adjust to such a perturbation via the up-regulation of other pathways. The fact that the peroxisomal citrate synthase can apparently compensate for deficiency in the expression of the mitochondrial isoform is highly interesting especially given the fact that the reduction imposed was relatively mild. Because the up to 40% reduction in expression is well within ranges reported in the literature under a variety of conditions (see, for example, http://www.genevestigator.ethz.ch), it would appear likely that this finding is of physiological relevance. Interestingly, in this respect, is the reduced level of photosynthetic pigments in the transformants, which we believe to be a part of the general reprogramming of metabolism following the inhibition of nitrate assimilation. However, in this study we were unable to identify the exact mechanism underlying the reduction in the levels of these pigments. It can, however, be anticipated that further developments of methods to determine metabolite levels at subcellular resolution (Farre et al., 2001) and their eventual coupling to GC-MS-based flux profiling methods (Baxter et al., 2007) will allow a more detailed dissection of their metabolic regulation in the future. MATERIALS AND METHODS Materials Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) ‘Moneymaker’ was obtained from Meyer Beck. Plants were handled as described in the literature (Carrari et al., 2003). All chemicals and enzymes used in this study were obtained from Roche Diagnostics with the exception of radiolabeled sodium bicarbonate and d-(1-14C) and d-(6-14C) glucoses, which were from Amersham International, d-(2-14C) and d-(3,4-14C) glucoses were from American Radiolabeled Chemicals, and 13C pyruvate was from Cambridge Isotope Laboratories. cDNA Cloning and Expression The 1,195-bp fragment of the mitochondrial citrate synthase enzyme was cloned in antisense orientation into the vector pBINAR (Liu et al., 1999) between the CaMV 35S promoter and the ocs terminator. This construct was introduced into plants by an Agrobacterium-mediated transformation protocol, and plants were selected and maintained as described in the literature (Tauberger et al., 2000). Initial screening of 53 lines was carried out using a combination of activity and mRNA measurements. These screens allowed the selection of four lines, which were chosen for subsequent physiological characterization. RNA Extraction and Quantification Total RNA was isolated using the commercially available Trizol kit (Gibco BRL) according to the manufacturer's suggestions for the extraction from plant material. Hybridization using standard conditions was carried out using the ESTs for the cytosolic isoform of citrate synthase obtained from the Clemson State University collection. Due to their relatively low expression, the transcript levels of all other isoforms of citrate synthase were determined by an established quantitative PCR method (Czechowski et al., 2004), using primers based on the ESTs of the Clemson State University collection. Microarray analysis was carried out exactly as described in Urbanczyk-Wochniak et al. (2006). Analysis of Enzyme Activities Enzyme extracts were prepared as described previously (Gibon et al., 2004), except that Triton-X 100 was used at a concentration of 1% and glycerol at 20%. Citrate synthase, isocitrate dehydrogenase (NAD), and phosphofructokinase (ATP) were assayed as described in Nunes-Nesi et al. (2007). Succinyl-CoA ligase was assayed as described in Studart-Guimarães et al. (2007). Malate dehydrogenase (NADP) was assayed as described in Scheibe and Stitt (1988). AGPase, phosphofructokinase (PPi), Suc-P synthase, cytosolic Fru-1,6-bisphosphatase, glucokinase, fructokinase, Glc-6-P dehydrogenase, NADP-isocitrate dehydrogenase, shikimate dehydrogenase, PEP carboxylase, acid invertase, ferredoxin-dependent GOGAT, nitrate reductase, and Gln synthetase were assayed as described in Gibon et al. (2004). Cytosolic and plastidial phosphoglucose isomerase were assayed as described in Weeden and Gottlieb (1982). Phosphoglucomutase was assayed as described in Manjunath et al. (1998). Determination of Metabolite Levels Leaf samples were taken at the time point indicated, immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80°C until further analysis. Extraction was performed by rapid grinding of tissue in liquid nitrogen and immediate addition of the appropriate extraction buffer. The levels of starch, Suc, Fru, and Glc in the leaf tissue were determined exactly as described previously (Fernie et al., 2001). Pigments were determined as described in Bender-Machado et al. (2004). The levels of all other metabolites were quantified by GC-MS exactly following the protocol described by Roessner et al. (2001) with the exception that peak identification was optimized to tomato tissues (Roessner-Tunali et al., 2003) and extended to include newly identified peaks (Kopka et al., 2005; Schauer et al., 2005). Nitrate and Nitrogen Determinations Nitrogen content was determined in lyophilized, oven-dried fine-powdered leaves by combustion in an Elemental Analyzer EA1110 (Carlo Erba Strumentazioni); 5-mg samples were preweighed in tin containers together with 20 mg of tungstic anhydride prior to dropping into the reactor, which was maintained at 900°C with an excess of oxygen, to allow combustion. The oxides produced were separated by gas chromatography and quantified by a thermal conductivity detector by reference to standard compounds with known elemental composition (Friis et al., 1998). Nitrate was determined as detailed in Fritz et al. (2006). Measurements of Photosynthetic Parameters The 14C-labeling pattern of Suc, starch, and other cellular constituents was performed by illuminating leaf discs (10-mm diameter) in a leaf-disc oxygen electrode (Hansatech, Kings Lynn) in saturating 14CO2 at a PFD of 250 μmol m−2 s−1 of photosynthetically active radiation at 20°C for 30 min and subsequent fractionation was performed exactly as detailed by Lytovchenko et al. (2002). Fluorescence emission was measured in vivo using a pulse amplitude modulation fluorometer (Walz) on 6-week-old plants maintained at irradiances ranging from 100 to 800 μmol photons m−2 s−1 for 30 min prior to measurement of chlorophyll fluorescence yield and relative rate of electron transport calculated using the WinControl software package (Walz). Gas-exchange measurements were performed in a special custom-designed open system (Lytovchenko et al., 2002). Measurement of Respiratory Parameters Dark respiration was measured using the same gas exchange system as defined above. Estimations of the TCA cycle flux on the basis of 14CO2 evolution were carried out following incubation of isolated leaf discs in 10 mm MES-KOH (pH 6.5) containing 2.32 KBq mL−1 of [1-14C], [2-14C], [3,4-14C], or [6-14C]Glc. 14CO2 evolved was trapped in KOH and quantified by liquid scintillation counting. The results were interpreted following ap Rees and Beevers (1960). Measurement of Redistribution of Isotope The fate of 13C-labeled pyruvate was traced following feeding of leaves excised from 6-week-old plants via the petiole placed in a solution containing 10 mm MES-KOH (pH 6.5) and 20 mm [U-13C]pyruvate for 3 h. Fractional enrichment of metabolite pools was determined exactly as described previously (Roessner-Tunali et al., 2004; Tieman et al., 2006) and label redistribution was expressed as per Studart-Guimarães et al. (2007). Statistical Analysis The t tests were performed using the algorithm embedded into Microsoft Excel (Microsoft). The term significant is used in the text only when the change in question has been confirmed to be significant (P < 0.05). Supplemental Data The following materials are available in the online version of this article.
[Supplemental Data]
Acknowledgments We gratefully acknowledge the excellent plant care of Helga Kulka, quantitative RT-PCR advice of Tomasz Czechowski, and the laboratory of Peter Dörmann for help with pigment analysis. We also thank Prof. Mark Stitt and Lothar Willmitzer for advice during the course of this work and Wioleta Wojtasik for technical support. Notes 1This work was supported in part by the Max-Planck-Gesellschaft (A.S.-P., A.N.-N., and A.R.F.) and in part by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (D.C.C.). The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is: Alisdair R. Fernie (fernie/at/mpimp-golm.mpg.de). [W]The online version of this article contains Web-only data. References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Planta. 1995; 196(4):756-64.
[Planta. 1995]EMBO J. 1995 Feb 15; 14(4):660-6.
[EMBO J. 1995]Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2004 Jun; 7(3):254-61.
[Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2004]Plant Cell. 2005 Dec; 17(12):3257-81.
[Plant Cell. 2005]Plant Cell. 2005 Jul; 17(7):2037-48.
[Plant Cell. 2005]Plant Physiol. 1994 Jun; 105(2):593-600.
[Plant Physiol. 1994]Plant Cell. 2005 Jul; 17(7):2037-48.
[Plant Cell. 2005]Plant Cell. 2005 Dec; 17(12):3257-81.
[Plant Cell. 2005]Plant Mol Biol. 2006 Mar; 60(5):773-92.
[Plant Mol Biol. 2006]Plant Physiol. 2003 Nov; 133(3):1322-35.
[Plant Physiol. 2003]Gene. 1988 Dec 15; 73(1):237-44.
[Gene. 1988]Mol Biol Evol. 1987 Jul; 4(4):406-25.
[Mol Biol Evol. 1987]Mol Biol Evol. 2007 Aug; 24(8):1596-9.
[Mol Biol Evol. 2007]EMBO J. 1995 Feb 15; 14(4):660-6.
[EMBO J. 1995]Plant J. 2007 Jun; 50(6):1093-106.
[Plant J. 2007]Plant Physiol. 1960 Nov; 35(6):830-8.
[Plant Physiol. 1960]Plant Physiol. 2007 Nov; 145(3):626-39.
[Plant Physiol. 2007]Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2004 Jun; 7(3):254-61.
[Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2004]Plant J. 2007 Feb; 49(4):729-39.
[Plant J. 2007]Plant J. 2004 Apr; 38(2):366-79.
[Plant J. 2004]Plant Physiol. 2005 Jul; 138(3):1195-204.
[Plant Physiol. 2005]BMC Bioinformatics. 2006 Dec 18; 7():535.
[BMC Bioinformatics. 2006]Plant Cell Physiol. 2004 Apr; 45(4):386-91.
[Plant Cell Physiol. 2004]Planta. 2007 Apr; 225(5):1245-53.
[Planta. 2007]Plant Cell. 2004 Dec; 16(12):3304-25.
[Plant Cell. 2004]Trends Plant Sci. 2003 Nov; 8(11):546-53.
[Trends Plant Sci. 2003]J Exp Bot. 2005 May; 56(415):1269-76.
[J Exp Bot. 2005]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Dec 19; 103(51):19587-92.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006]Plant Physiol. 2003 Nov; 133(3):1322-35.
[Plant Physiol. 2003]Plant Physiol. 2005 Feb; 137(2):611-22.
[Plant Physiol. 2005]Plant J. 2006 May; 46(4):533-48.
[Plant J. 2006]Plant J. 2007 Feb; 49(4):729-39.
[Plant J. 2007]Plant Physiol. 2006 Nov; 142(3):1304-17.
[Plant Physiol. 2006]Plant Cell. 2005 Sep; 17(9):2587-600.
[Plant Cell. 2005]Genome Biol. 2006; 7(8):R76.
[Genome Biol. 2006]Plant Physiol. 1978 Apr; 61(4):611-616.
[Plant Physiol. 1978]Plant Physiol. 2001 Oct; 127(2):685-700.
[Plant Physiol. 2001]Phytochemistry. 2007 Aug-Sep; 68(16-18):2313-9.
[Phytochemistry. 2007]Plant Physiol. 2003 Nov; 133(3):1322-35.
[Plant Physiol. 2003]Plant J. 2000 Jul; 23(1):43-53.
[Plant J. 2000]Plant J. 2004 Apr; 38(2):366-79.
[Plant J. 2004]Plant Mol Biol. 2006 Mar; 60(5):773-92.
[Plant Mol Biol. 2006]Plant Cell. 2004 Dec; 16(12):3304-25.
[Plant Cell. 2004]Plant J. 2007 Jun; 50(6):1093-106.
[Plant J. 2007]Plant Physiol. 2007 Nov; 145(3):626-39.
[Plant Physiol. 2007]Plant Physiol. 1982 Mar; 69(3):717-723.
[Plant Physiol. 1982]Plant Physiol. 1998 Jul; 117(3):997-1006.
[Plant Physiol. 1998]Planta. 2001 Jan; 212(2):250-63.
[Planta. 2001]Plant Mol Biol. 2004 Jul; 55(5):645-62.
[Plant Mol Biol. 2004]Plant Cell. 2001 Jan; 13(1):11-29.
[Plant Cell. 2001]Plant Physiol. 2003 Sep; 133(1):84-99.
[Plant Physiol. 2003]Bioinformatics. 2005 Apr 15; 21(8):1635-8.
[Bioinformatics. 2005]Plant J. 2006 May; 46(4):533-48.
[Plant J. 2006]Planta. 2002 Oct; 215(6):1013-21.
[Planta. 2002]Plant Mol Biol. 2006 Mar; 60(5):773-92.
[Plant Mol Biol. 2006]Plant J. 2004 Aug; 39(4):668-79.
[Plant J. 2004]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 May 23; 103(21):8287-92.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006]Plant Physiol. 2007 Nov; 145(3):626-39.
[Plant Physiol. 2007]