![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Public Domain declaration which stipulates that, once placed in the public domain, this work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose Immunodominant Tuberculosis CD8 Antigens Preferentially Restricted by HLA-B 1 Department of Pediatrics, Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, Oregon, United States of America 2 Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, Oregon, United States of America 3 Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, Oregon, United States of America 4 Portland Veterans Administration Medical Center, Portland, Oregon, United States of America 5 La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology, San Diego, California, United States of America William Bishai, Editor Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, United States of America * To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: lewinsod/at/ohsu.edu Received April 25, 2007; Accepted July 12, 2007. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract CD8+ T cells are essential for host defense to intracellular bacterial pathogens such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb), Salmonella species, and Listeria monocytogenes, yet the repertoire and dominance pattern of human CD8 antigens for these pathogens remains poorly characterized. Tuberculosis (TB), the disease caused by Mtb infection, remains one of the leading causes of infectious morbidity and mortality worldwide and is the most frequent opportunistic infection in individuals with HIV/AIDS. Therefore, we undertook this study to define immunodominant CD8 Mtb antigens. First, using IFN-γ ELISPOT and synthetic peptide arrays as a source of antigen, we measured ex vivo frequencies of CD8+ T cells recognizing known immunodominant CD4+ T cell antigens in persons with latent tuberculosis infection. In addition, limiting dilution was used to generate panels of Mtb-specific T cell clones. Using the peptide arrays, we identified the antigenic specificity of the majority of T cell clones, defining several new epitopes. In all cases, peptide representing the minimal epitope bound to the major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-restricting allele with high affinity, and in all but one case the restricting allele was an HLA-B allele. Furthermore, individuals from whom the T cell clone was isolated harbored high ex vivo frequency CD8+ T cell responses specific for the epitope, and in individuals tested, the epitope represented the single immunodominant response within the CD8 antigen. We conclude that Mtb-specific CD8+ T cells are found in high frequency in infected individuals and are restricted predominantly by HLA-B alleles, and that synthetic peptide arrays can be used to define epitope specificities without prior bias as to MHC binding affinity. These findings provide an improved understanding of immunodominance in humans and may contribute to a development of an effective TB vaccine and improved immunodiagnostics. Author Summary CD8+ T cells are essential for host defense to intracellular bacterial pathogens such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb), Salmonella species, and Listeria monocytogenes, yet little is known about the antigens recognized by human CD8+ T cells in response to tuberculosis (TB). TB, the disease caused by Mtb infection, remains one of the leading causes of illness and death worldwide and is a frequent complicating infection in individuals with HIV/AIDS. Therefore, we undertook this study to define commonly recognized CD8 Mtb antigens. First, we measured the frequencies of CD8+ T cells recognizing Mtb antigens known to be recognized by CD4+ T cell antigens in persons infected with Mtb. In addition, we identified the Mtb antigen and epitope recognized by several CD8+ T cell clones isolated from infected individuals. The epitope was presented to the T cell clones by an HLA-B allele in all but one case. We conclude that Mtb-specific CD8+ T cells are found in high frequency in infected individuals and are restricted predominantly by HLA-B alleles. These findings provide an improved understanding of how the human immune system recognizes intracellular pathogens and may contribute to the development of an effective TB vaccine and improved immunodiagnostics. Introduction Infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) remains an important cause of infectious disease, morbidity, and mortality worldwide [1] and has emerged as a major opportunistic infection in individuals with HIV/AIDS [2]. Control of infection with Mtb relies heavily on the cellular immune system, that is, the interaction of lymphocytes and Mtb-infected macrophages and dendritic cells (DCs) [3,4]. CD8+ T cells are associated with strong CD4+ TH1 cell responses, and are not only essential for effective immunity to viral pathogens, but also for immunity to some intracellular bacteria, such as Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella species [5]. Increasing experimental evidence in the mouse tuberculosis (TB) model has suggested a protective role for CD8+ T cells in the host response. For example, adoptive transfer or in vivo depletion of CD8+ cells showed that this subset could confer protection against subsequent challenge [6–8]. β2-microglobulin–deficient mice, deficient in expression of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I, are more susceptible to Mtb [9] and to large doses of Bacille Calmette Guérin [10] infection than their wild-type littermates. This finding has been corroborated in CD8-deficient mice [11] and other mice deficient in class I processing and presentation [11–13]. However, mice lacking class Ia–restricted CD8+ T cells demonstrate more moderate susceptibility to Mtb infection [14,15]. In humans, Mtb-specific CD8+ T cells have been identified in Mtb-infected individuals and include CD8+ T cells that are classically, MHC-Ia, restricted [16–22], and non-classically, MHC-Ib, restricted by HLA-E [18,23], and by CD1 [24–26]. Taken together, studies of mice and humans support an important role for CD8+ T cells in TB immunity. For most infections, the repertoire of the CD8 response is shaped by the entry of antigen into the MHC-I processing pathway, binding of peptides and/or non-peptide antigens to MHC-I molecules, and recognition of these structures by T cells. Ultimately, a relatively limited subset of pathogen-specific T cells emerge, a process that has been termed immunodominance [27]. While substantial effort has focused on defining immunodominant CD8 antigens for important human viral pathogens such as HIV and cytomegalovirus (CMV), little is known about the antigens recognized by human CD8+ T cell in response to intracellular bacterial infections. Furthermore, although a number of commonly recognized CD4 Mtb antigens have been described [28,29] (ESAT-6, CFP10, Ag85, etc.), surprisingly little is known about common Mtb antigens recognized by human CD8+ T cells. The majority of CD8+ epitopes that have been identified were defined by testing of Mtb peptides selected for high-affinity binding to MHC class Ia molecules (HLA-A2 in most cases; [19,20,30–34]). In almost all of these examples, however, the ex vivo frequency of these T cells in Mtb-infected individuals is low or undetectable, suggesting that these specificities may not represent immunodominant responses. In contrast, in the limited cases in which T cells have been used to define epitopes contained in selected Mtb antigens, high ex vivo frequencies have been demonstrated [17,35], suggesting that a T cell–centered approach can identify immunodominant epitopes. Moreover, CD8+ T cell responses to some Mtb antigens that represent good CD4 antigens (CFP10, ESAT-6, Ag85, and Mtb39) have been detected at high frequency in persons infected with Mtb [17–19,34]. Therefore, we used a limited library of overlapping synthetic peptides representing several known CD4 Mtb antigens to determine the magnitude of the CD8 response to these antigens in persons with active TB and latent TB infection (LTBI), as well as uninfected individuals. Furthermore, we utilized a panel of Mtb-specific CD8+ T cell clones to define minimal epitopes recognized within these antigens and determined the contribution of these novel epitopes to the ex vivo Mtb-specific CD8 response. Results Definition of Immunodominant Mtb-Specific CD8 Antigens To define immunodominant Mtb-specific CD8 antigens, and to determine whether or not these responses result from infection with Mtb, we have used CD8+ T cells from uninfected donors, those with LTBI, or those actively infected with Mtb. Responses were determined either directly ex vivo, or using CD8+ T cell clones obtained by limiting dilution cloning on Mtb-infected autologous DCs [36]. As much is known about dominant CD4 Mtb antigens, a panel of these commonly recognized antigens was selected for further evaluation. These were Mtb39, CFP10, Mtb8.4, Mtb9.9A, ESAT-6, Ag85b, 19kDa, and EsxG. To avoid bias introduced by using peptides of predicted HLA binding specificity, we synthesized overlapping peptides (15 aa, overlap 11 aa) to represent the proteins of interest [17]. To accurately determine the ex vivo effector cell frequencies of CD8+ T cells, linear regression analysis was used. As shown in Figure 1
Uninfected individuals (n = 14), those with LTBI (n = 20), and those with active TB (n = 12) were evaluated for CD8 responses to a panel of Mtb CD4+ T cell antigens, as well as to Mtb-infected DCs. All individuals tested had robust CD8+ T cell responses to Mtb-infected DCs and were of greater magnitude in individuals with active TB than in those with LTBI (p = 0.01; Figure 2
Definition of the Minimal Epitope Recognized by Mtb-Specific CD8+ T Cell Clones These ex vivo frequency data demonstrated the presence of high-frequency responses to a number of known Mtb antigens, but did not shed light on the restricting allele, minimal epitope, or dominance hierarchy within the gene of interest. To address this question, we performed limiting dilution cloning of human CD8+ T cells using Mtb-infected DCs [36], and generated panels of both classically and non-classically HLA-restricted CD8+ T cell clones. Using peptide pools representing known CD4 antigens, the antigenic specificity of the HLA-Ia-restricted clones was defined in more than half of the clones (Table 2). This approach is demonstrated in detail for a single representative clone, D466 D6, derived from an individual with active TB. As shown in Figure 3
Immunodominance of MTb CD8 Epitopes in Infected Individuals Because each of the individual CD8+ T cell clones was derived based on growth in the presence of Mtb- infected DCs, we sought to determine whether or not the antigen and epitopes identified reflected immunodominant epitopes ex vivo. Two independent approaches were pursued, the first to determine if the response was present at high frequency, and the second to determine what proportion of the total response to the antigen was constituted by the epitope. To determine the ex vivo effector cell frequency, as described in Figure 1
HLA Binding Affinity to CD8+ T Cell Epitopes Because much work on human CD8+ T cell responses to Mtb has relied upon the use of HLA prediction algorithms, as each epitope was defined we asked whether or not the epitopes would have been predicted by these approaches. Given the prevalence of HLA-B alleles and 10-mer and 11-mer epitopes, it is perhaps not surprising that many of these epitopes were not ranked strongly (unpublished data). This left open the possibility that either HLA binding was indeed not predictive of antigenicity, or simply highlighted the limitations of those algorithms at the time they were used. To address this question experimentally, the IC50 for each peptide that had been synthesized in the course of definition of the minimal epitope was determined against a panel of human HLA molecules (Table S1). Shown in Table 3 is the IC50 for the minimal epitope with the cognate restricting allele. These data demonstrate that the T cell epitopes bound avidly to HLA, and show a high degree of concordance between the T cell epitope data and HLA binding data (Figure 5 Discussion Although the complete repertoire of CD8+ T cell responses in Mtb remains incompletely characterized, the following conclusions can be drawn. First, CD8+ T cell responses are present in persons infected with Mtb at frequencies that are comparable to that seen following many common viral infections such as vaccinia, influenza, and CMV [37,38]. This conclusion is based both on the pooled peptide experiments described above, and on the observation that when defined, dominant epitopes are present at high ex vivo frequencies. Conversely, we have not observed high-frequency responses to CD4+ T cell antigens in those without evidence of infection with Mtb. This observation strongly supports the hypothesis that these responses reflect an adaptively acquired response to infection with Mtb, rather than an innate response. By contrast, CD8+ T cell responses to Mtb-infected DCs were equivalent in infected and uninfected individuals. Using limiting dilution analysis, we have studied the proportions of Ia- versus Ib- restricted CD8+ T cells in Mtb-infected compared to uninfected individuals and have noted that Ib-restricted CD8+ T cell responses predominate in uninfected individuals (D. Lewinsohn, unpublished data). Therefore, we speculate that the response detected to Mtb-infected DCs in uninfected individuals may reflect chiefly a Ib-restricted response. While we did not observe an association of responses to specific antigens with disease status, a larger study might reveal more subtle differences. All but one of the epitopes that have been mapped to date are restricted by HLA-B molecules. The reasons for this possible skewing are not yet clear. It is a formal possibility that the cloning methods we used biased isolation of HLA-B- over HLA-A-restricted T cell clones. However, using identical cloning methodology, we have isolated T cell clones specific for vaccinia, CMV, and influenza that did not display a preference for HLA-B restriction (D. Lewinsohn, unpublished data). Furthermore, in all three cases where we tested ex vivo the entire set of peptides representing CFP10, the entire response mapped to the HLA-B-restricted epitope (Figure 6 While the immune response within an individual to a given antigen is narrowly focused, dominant epitopes that would be useful for population-based analysis have yet to be defined. This conclusion is based on the fact that few of the HLA-A2 epitopes described to date have proved to be widely recognized, and, most importantly, on the observation that a wide variety of HLA alleles appear to be used in the recognition of Mtb antigens. The antigen CFP10 is an excellent case in point. As is demonstrated in Table 3, T cell clones have been used to define high-frequency epitopes restricted by a variety of HLA alleles. While the N-terminal 15 aa could reasonably be considered immunogenic, in all but one case (CFP102–11; HLA-B44) the minimal epitope defined has been unique to the individual from whom the T cells were derived. By using a T cell–driven approach to epitope identification, it is possible to define dominant epitopes in humans infected with Mtb. While it is striking that for several of the T cell clones the ex vivo frequency of epitope-specific T cells was equal to or exceeded the total ex vivo frequency of Mtb-specific T cells, we acknowledge that the use of peptide-loaded DCs to determine T cell frequency likely overrepresents the proportion of the total Mtb-specific CD8+ T cell responses. Possible reasons are that Mtb infection is likely to produce relatively less cognate peptide compared to peptide loading, and that Mtb infection could possibly interfere with class I processing and presentation. Although the current observations are limited to a small panel of known CD4 antigens, current work is underway to perform a genome-wide survey of dominant CD8 antigens in Mtb. Definition of this panel will likely prove useful in the further study of the natural history of infection with Mtb and in the design of novel vaccines and diagnostics. In TB, evaluation of epitopes based strictly on HLA binding algorithms has focused on HLA-A2, and has often failed to define dominant epitopes. Our observation that many of the epitopes are HLA-B restricted, and often longer than 9 aa, for which these algorithms are less robust, may help explain these findings. However, when evaluated experimentally, all of the minimal epitopes exhibit high-affinity binding to the cognate-restricting allele. In this regard, substantial progress in HLA prediction algorithms is evident [42,43], and could facilitate more efficient identification of dominant epitopes. Here, more information with regard to longer peptides will be of benefit. Finally, we speculate that these caveats are likely to apply to other intracellular pathogens as well. One limitation to current knowledge is that the responses in humans have been made at a single time point. In this regard, a feature of Mtb is the chronic exposure to antigen that may persist for many years. How this chronic infection influences the shaping of the immune response and dominance repertoire is an important question that remains unresolved. The advent of new reagents for immunologic studies in the mouse model [44] will likely be useful in this regard. For example, chronic antigenic exposure seems likely to alter the affinity of the T cell response over time. Furthermore, it is possible that such long-term infection might lead to clonal exhaustion or dysfunction as has been described for chronic viral infection [38]. Finally, given the very high-frequency responses that we and others have observed to Mtb-infected DCs and to single antigens, it appears that the immune response to Mtb occupies a sizable fraction of the host's immunological activity, similar to that previously observed for infection with CMV [45]. If so, then this may have important implications for the aging immune system, and potentially for the requirements for the long-term containment of intracellular infection. For example, it is possible that threshold Mtb-specific CD8 frequencies are necessary for the maintenance of a state of chronic persistence. Conversely, the substantial immunological effort directed at Mtb may limit the host's ability to effectively combat novel infections. As a result, this static picture leaves open important questions as to the evolution of the Mtb-specific responses, and its relationship with chronic infection with Mtb. It seems likely that Mtb has evolved potent mechanisms to modulate the immune response. At present, specific mechanisms for MHC-I immune modulation have not been described. However, it appears that TLR II stimulation via the Mtb-derived 19-kDa lipoprotein can modulate both MHC-I and MHC-II antigen processing, and can interfere with IFN-γ signaling [46–49]. Further work on the T cell subsets important in Mtb, including the immunodominant epitopes, will extend our understanding of the immunology of TB and potentially contribute to the development of a vaccine against this major killer. How the Mtb-specific CD8+ T cell response fits into the natural history of infection with Mtb remains poorly characterized. For example, the ontogeny of the CD8+ T cell response relative to infection with Mtb remains unknown, as does the relationship of CD8+ T cell frequencies with regard to bacterial burden. However, by defining commonly recognized CD8+ T cell antigens and epitopes, it will become increasingly possible to employ direct ex vivo analysis to more precisely define Mtb-specific T cell responses in various subject groups of particular interest. Materials and Methods Study participants. Study participants, protocols, and consent forms were approved by the Oregon Health and Science University institutional review board. Informed consent was obtained from all participants. Uninfected individuals and individuals with LTBI were recruited from employees at Oregon Health and Science University as previously described [36]. Uninfected individuals were defined as healthy individuals with a negative tuberculin skin test and no known risk factors for infection with Mtb. Individuals with LTBI were defined as healthy persons with a positive tuberculin skin test and no symptoms and signs of active TB. Individuals with active TB were recruited via institutional review board–approved advertisement and were self-referred from the Multnomah County TB Clinic, Portland, Oregon, United States, or from the Washington County TB Clinic, Hillsboro, Oregon, United States. In all active TB cases, pulmonary TB was diagnosed by the TB Controller of these counties and confirmed by positive sputum culture for Mtb. PBMCs were isolated from whole blood obtained by venipuncture or apheresis. Media and reagents. Culture medium consisted of RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% fetal bovine sera (BioWhittaker, http://www.cambrex.com/), 5 × 10−5 M 2 ME (Sigma-Aldrich, http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/), and 2 mM glutamine (GIBCO BRL, http://www.invitrogen.com/). For the growth and assay of Mtb-reactive T cell clones, RPMI 1640 was supplemented with 10% human serum. Mtb strain H37Rv was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (http://www.atcc.org/) and prepared as previously described [36]. Peptides were synthesized by Genemed Synthesis (http://www.genemedsyn.com/). Synthetic peptide pools consisted of 15 mers overlapping by 11 aa, representing Mtb proteins demonstrated to be potent CD4 antigens. Peptide pools representing CFP10 [50,51], ESAT-6 [52], Mtb39a (two pools, A & B) [53], Mtb8.4 [54], Mtb 9.9A [16], EsxG [55,56], 19kDa antigen [57], and antigen 85b (two pools, A & B) [58] were synthesized. Peptides were resuspended in DMSO, and up to 50 peptides were combined into one pool such that each peptide in the pool was at a concentration of 1 mg/ml. Peptide pools were stored at −80 °C. Cell lines and T cell clones. EBV-transformed B cell lines, LCLs, were either generated in our laboratory using supernatants from the cell line 9B5–8 (American Type Culture Collection) or obtained from the National Marrow Donor Program (http://www.marrow.org/). LCLs were maintained by continuous passage as previously described [18]. Mtb-specific T cell clones were isolated from individuals with LTBI or active TB, using Mtb-infected DCs as APCs and limiting dilution cloning methodology as previously described [36]. Briefly, CD8+ T cells were isolated from PBMCs using negative selection using CD4 antibody-coated beads and then positive selection using CD8 antibody-coated magnetic beads per the manufacturer's instructions (Miltenyi Biotec, http://www.miltenyibiotec.com/) or via flow cytometry. In this case, CD4-PE (BD Biosciences, catalog #555347; http://www.bdbiosciences.com/) negative and CD8-APC (BD Biosciences, catalog #555369) positive cells (purity >99%) were sorted on a Becton Dickinson LSR II (http://www.bd.com/). T cells were seeded at various concentrations in the presence of a 1 × 105–irradiated autologous Mtb-infected DC, generated as described below, and rIL-2 (5 ng/ml) in cell culture media consisting of 200 μl of RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% human sera. Wells exhibiting growth between 10–14 d were assessed for Mtb specificity using ELISPOT and Mtb-infected DCs as a source of APCs. T cells retaining Mtb specificity were further phenotyped for αβ T cell receptor expression and CD8 expression by FACS and expanded as described below. V beta usage was determined using the IOTest Beta Mark Kit from Beckman Coulter, catalog #IM3497 (http://www.beckmancoulter.com/). Expansion of T cell clones. To expand the CD8+ T cell clones, a rapid expansion protocol using anti-CD3 mAb stimulation was used as described previously [18]. Generation and infection of peripheral blood DCs. Monocyte-derived DCs were prepared according to a modified method of Romani et al. [18,59]. To generate Mtb-infected DCs, cells (1 × 106) were cultured overnight in the presence of Mtb at a multiplicity of infection = 50:1. We have determined that this multiplicity of infection is optimal for detection of Mtb-specific CD8+ T cells, as heavy infection is required to optimize entry of antigen into the class I processing pathway [60]. After 18 h, the cells were harvested and resuspended in RPMI/10% human serum. MHC binding assays. The MHC peptide binding assay utilized measures the ability of peptide ligands to inhibit the binding of a radiolabeled peptide to purified MHC molecules, and has been described in detail elsewhere [61] . Briefly, purified MHC molecules, test peptides, and a radiolabeled probe peptide are incubated at room temperature in the presence of human β2-microglobulin and a cocktail of protease inhibitors. After a 2-d incubation, binding of the radiolabeled peptide to the corresponding MHC class I molecule is determined by capturing MHC/peptide complexes on W6/32 antibody (anti-HLA A, B, and C) or B123.2 (anti-HLA B, C, and some A) coated plates, and measuring bound cpm using a microscintillation counter. For competition assays, the concentration of peptide yielding 50% inhibition of the binding of the radiolabeled peptide is calculated. Peptides are typically tested at six different concentrations covering a 100,000-fold dose range, and in three or more independent assays. Under the conditions utilized, where [label] < [MHC] and IC50 ≥ [MHC], the measured IC50 values are reasonable approximations of the true Kd values. IFN-γ ELISPOT assay. The IFN-γ ELISPOT assay was performed as described previously [18]. For determination of ex vivo frequencies of CD8+ T cells responding to Mtb infection or Mtb antigens, CD8+ T cells were positively selected from PBMCs using magnetic beads (Miltenyi Biotec) such that >97% of the cell population were CD8+ T cells. These CD8+ T cells were used as a source of responder T cells and tested in duplicate at four different cell concentrations (5 × 105, 2.5 × 105, 1.2 × 105, and 6 × 104 cells/well). Autologous DCs (20,000 cells/well) were used as APCs, and DCs were either infected with Mtb or pulsed with peptide pools (5 μg/ml, final concentration of each peptide) and then added to the assay. For assays using T cell clones, T cells (1,000 or 5,000 cells/well) were incubated with autologous LCL (20,000 cells/well) in the presence or absence of antigen. Negative and positive controls were included in each assay and consisted of wells containing T cells and DCs either without antigen or without antigen but with inclusion of phytohemagglutanin (PHA, 10 μg/ml; EMD Biosciences, http://www.emdbiosciences.com/), respectively. For all assays, responding T cells were incubated with APCs overnight. Data analysis. To determine the ex vivo frequency of antigen-specific T cells, the average number of spots per well for each duplicate was plotted against the number of responder cells per well. Linear regression analysis was used to determine the slope of the line, which represents the frequency of antigen-specific T cells. The assay is considered positive, i.e., reflecting the presence of a primed T cell response, if the binomial probability [62] for the number of spots is significantly different by experimental and control assays, i.e., if the experimental line is statistically significantly different from the control line. To determine differences in ex vivo T cell frequencies between groups, Wilcoxon/Kruskal–Wallis analysis was used. Online supplemental material. Ex vivo T cell frequencies and MHC binding assays were performed exactly as described above. Table S1: IC50 (nM) of Peptide Binding to HLA (87 KB PDF) Click here for additional data file.(361K, doc) Accession Numbers The accession numbers from TubercuList (http://genolist.pasteur.fr/TubercuList/) for Mtb proteins discussed in the manuscript are as follows: 19kd (Rv3763); Ag85B (Rv1886c), CFP10 (Rv3874); ESAT 6 (Rv3875); EsxG (Rv0287), Mtb8.4 (Rv1174c); Mtb9.9A (Rv1793); Mtb39 (Rv1196). Acknowledgments We are grateful to Roger Croteau for his expert assistance. Abbreviations
Footnotes Author contributions. DAL, AS, and DML conceived and designed the experiments. EW, GMS, KET, MSC, MDN, MEC, and JS performed the experiments. DAL, GMS, JS, and DML analyzed the data. AS contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools. DAL and DML wrote the paper. Funding. This work was supported by a VA Merit Review Grant and the Portland VA Medical Center, and by the ALA Career Investigator Awards (DML), US National Institutes of Health HHSN266200400081C (NO1-A1–400081) (DAL and DML), R01AI054474 (DAL), and R01AI48090 (DML). Competing interests. The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Annu Rev Immunol. 2001; 19():93-129.
[Annu Rev Immunol. 2001]Annu Rev Immunol. 2004; 22():599-623.
[Annu Rev Immunol. 2004]Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 1994; 189():1-8.
[Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 1994]Tubercle. 1987 Dec; 68(4):277-83.
[Tubercle. 1987]Immunology. 1994 Nov; 83(3):341-6.
[Immunology. 1994]Annu Rev Immunol. 1999; 17():51-88.
[Annu Rev Immunol. 1999]Scand J Infect Dis. 2001; 33(9):643-7.
[Scand J Infect Dis. 2001]Microbes Infect. 2005 May; 7(5-6):922-31.
[Microbes Infect. 2005]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Jan 6; 95(1):270-5.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998]J Immunol. 1998 Sep 1; 161(5):2400-6.
[J Immunol. 1998]J Immunol. 2000 Jul 15; 165(2):925-30.
[J Immunol. 2000]J Immunol. 2001 Jan 1; 166(1):439-46.
[J Immunol. 2001]J Immunol. 2000 Jul 15; 165(2):925-30.
[J Immunol. 2000]Annu Rev Immunol. 2003; 21():29-70.
[Annu Rev Immunol. 2003]Nat Immunol. 2005 Sep; 6(9):873-9.
[Nat Immunol. 2005]Nature. 2004 Dec 9; 432(7018):769-75.
[Nature. 2004]C R Acad Sci III. 1998 Nov; 321(11):941-51.
[C R Acad Sci III. 1998]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Mar 15; 91(6):2091-4.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994]Immunity. 2005 Feb; 22(2):155-61.
[Immunity. 2005]J Exp Med. 2004 Dec 6; 200(11):1479-89.
[J Exp Med. 2004]Nat Immunol. 2005 Sep; 6(9):873-9.
[Nat Immunol. 2005]J Exp Med. 2005 Sep 5; 202(5):673-85.
[J Exp Med. 2005]J Immunol. 2001 Jul 15; 167(2):910-8.
[J Immunol. 2001]Infect Immun. 2004 Apr; 72(4):2101-10.
[Infect Immun. 2004]J Immunol. 2000 Jul 15; 165(2):925-30.
[J Immunol. 2000]J Immunol. 2000 Jul 15; 165(2):925-30.
[J Immunol. 2000]Microbiology. 1998 Nov; 144 ( Pt 11)():3195-203.
[Microbiology. 1998]J Clin Microbiol. 2000 Sep; 38(9):3285-90.
[J Clin Microbiol. 2000]Infect Immun. 1995 May; 63(5):1710-7.
[Infect Immun. 1995]Infect Immun. 1999 Jun; 67(6):2941-50.
[Infect Immun. 1999]J Exp Med. 2002 Dec 2; 196(11):1473-81.
[J Exp Med. 2002]J Immunol. 2000 Jul 15; 165(2):925-30.
[J Immunol. 2000]J Exp Med. 2002 Dec 2; 196(11):1473-81.
[J Exp Med. 2002]J Exp Med. 2002 Dec 2; 196(11):1473-81.
[J Exp Med. 2002]J Exp Med. 1994 Jul 1; 180(1):83-93.
[J Exp Med. 1994]Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003 Dec 1; 168(11):1346-52.
[Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003]J Exp Med. 2002 Dec 2; 196(11):1473-81.
[J Exp Med. 2002]Microbes Infect. 2006 Sep; 8(11):2587-98.
[Microbes Infect. 2006]