![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||
C. elegans pgp-5 IS INVOLVED IN RESISTANCE TO BACTERIAL INFECTION AND HEAVY METAL AND ITS REGULATION REQUIRES TIR-1 AND A p38 MAP KINASE CASCADE 1Department of Genetics, and Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305-5120, USA 2Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC, Canada V5A 1S6 Address correspondence to M-W Tan: Department of Genetics, and Department of Microbiology and Immunology, M337 Always Building, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305-5120, USA; Tel. (650) 736-1688; Fax. (650) 735-1534; E-Mail: (mwtan/at/stanford.edu) #Current address : Centre d'Immunologie de Marseille-Luminy, INSERM/CNRS/Université de la Méditerranée, Case 906, 13288 Marseille Cedex 09, France The publisher's final edited version of this article is available at Biochem Biophys Res Commun. See other articles in PMC that cite the published article.Abstract Animals and plants respond to bacterial infections and environmental stresses by inducing overlapping repertoires of defense genes. How the signals associated with infection and abiotic stresses are differentially integrated within a whole organism remains to be fully addressed. We show that the transcription of a C. elegans ABC transporter, pgp-5 is induced by both bacterial infection and heavy metal stress, but the magnitude and tissue distribution of its expression differs, depending on the type of stressor. PGP-5 contributes to resistance to bacterial infection and heavy metals. Using pgp-5 transcription as a read-out, we show that signals from both biotic and abiotic stresses are integrated by TIR-1, a TIR-domain adaptor protein orthologous to human SARM, and a p38 MAP kinase signaling cassette. We further demonstrate that not all the TIR-1 isoforms are necessary for nematode resistance to infection, suggesting a molecular basis for the differential response to abiotic and biotic stress. Keywords: C. elegans, P. aeruginosa, innate immunity, stress, cadmium, infection, P-glycoprotein INTRODUCTION In the soil, Caenorhabditis elegans contacts with natural toxins and must defend against potentially pathogenic microorganisms that constitute its food. To defend against pathogens, C. elegans uses an immune system that is regulated by several signaling pathways, including the TGF-β [1], insulin [2] and p38 MAPK pathways. [3]. Phosphorylation of the p38 MAPK, PMK-1 and nematode resistance to pathogens requires the evolutionarily conserved protein TIR-1 [4; 5]. To resist environmental toxins, such as heavy metals, C. elegans utilizes strategies ranging from avoidance to detoxification. Evolutionary conserved signaling pathways, like JNK and p38 MAPK, regulate resistance to these stresses [6; 7]. Interestingly, the p38 MAPK pathway is required for resistance to toxins and nematode immunity [6; 8]. P-glycoproteins (PGP) represent an evolutionary well-conserved sub-group of ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters that protect cells by actively exporting drugs and toxins [9]. The C. elegans genome encodes 15 PGP proteins [10]. Athough present in almost every tissue [11], the functions of only 3 have been determined. pgp-2 is expressed in the intestine and is required for acidification of lysosomes and lipid storage [12]. pgp-1 and pgp-3 are necessary to resist phenazine toxins secreted by the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa [13], and contribute to heavy metals and drugs resistance [14; 15]. Although signaling cascades necessary for the nematode resistance to infection and stresses have been identified and transcriptional responses to these stresses have been studied at the whole genome level [16; 17; 18; 19], much remained to be elucidated about how specific downstream effectors are regulated. Moreover, it is not known whether the signaling modules regulating nematode immunity act independently or are part of a global regulation network that integrates the responses to pathogens and stress, as previously suggested [20]. We showed that the C. elegans P-glycoprotein gene pgp-5 is induced upon exposure to heavy metals and bacterial pathogens and is necessary for full resistance to these treatments. By investigating the regulation of pgp-5 expression, we found that the axis defined by TIR-1-p38 MAPK module plays a significant role in integrating the signals from both biotic and abiotic stresses. MATERIALS AND METHODS Infection and toxicity assays Infection assays were performed as described [17]. For toxicity assays, three 1-day-old adult hermaphrodites were deposited on plates seeded with OP50 and allowed to lay eggs for 4–5 h. After the parents were removed, the eggs were counted and the plates incubated for 3 days at 20ºC. The percentage of adults was calculated as the total number of adults divided by the total number of eggs. Each test was performed at least twice with 4 replicates per condition. RNAi and qRT-PCR experiments RNAi and qRT-PCR experiments were performed as described [17], and detailed in Supplemental Materials and Methods. After 24 h treatment, animals were either collected for microscopy, COPAS analysis or RNA preparation. The identity of dsRNA-expressing bacteria (Geneservice, UK) was confirmed by sequencing or restriction digest. Statistical analysis For survival analysis, StatView and Prism softwares were used to calculate the mean time to death (TDmean) and the Kaplan-Meier Log rank test assessed the similarity between survival curves. Student’s t-tests were calculated using Microsoft Excel. Values of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS Transcription of pgp-5 is induced during infection and heavy metal stress In whole-genome microarray experiments, expression of pgp-5 was among the most highly induced in response to intestinal infection by P. aeruginosa strain PA14 (hereafter referred to as PA14) [17; 18]. To confirm and extend these observations, we measured the mRNA levels of pgp-5 and additional pgp genes upon PA14 infection and exposure to heavy metals by quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR). We included pgp-1 and pgp-3 for their known function in resistance to PA14 toxin [13], pgp-4 because it is adjacent to pgp-3, and a cluster composed of pgp-5, pgp-6, pgp-7 and pgp-8 (Supplemental Fig. 1A). Following infection or exposure to cadmium, pgp-5 was the only tested gene induced by at least 3-fold in both conditions (Fig. 1A and 1B
The magnitude and tissue distribution of pgp-5 expression in response to infection and environmental insults are different To determine if the response of pgp-5 to different forms of stresses differs in tissue expression, and to confirm the observed difference in magnitude, we monitored the expression of green fluorescence protein (GFP) in ppgp-5::gfp transgenic animals. The ppgp-5::gfp reporter strain contains an integrated transgene, ppgp-5::gfp, in which the GFP-encoding gene is under the control of the 300 bp upstream sequence of the pgp-5 promoter (Supplemental Fig. 1B). Under standard growth conditions, green fluorescence was undetectable at low magnification (25X) and was detected at a very low level throughout the intestine (Supplemental Fig. 2A) at high magnification (200X) in the majority of adult animals. Consistent with microarray and qRT-PCR data, we observed a very strong increase of green fluorescence in the intestine of PA14-infected worms (Supplemental Fig 2B), and quantified fluorescence related to pgp-5 induction with the COPAS worm sorter (Supplemental Fig 2D). pgp-5 expression was also induced in the intestine of animals infected with pathogenic Salmonella typhimurium, Serratia marcescens or Staphylococcus aureus, but not in worms fed on the non-pathogenic Bacillus subtilis (Supplemental Table 2). Heavy metals, such as cadmium robustly induced the pgp-5 transcription in intestinal cells of adults (Supplemental Fig. 2C and D). In addition to the intestinal expression, majority of cadmium-treated animals expressed the transgene in the terminal bulb of the pharynx (80%, n = 59, Supplemental Fig. 2C). In contrast, only 14% (n = 74) of PA14-infected animals had detectable transgene expression in the pharynx. Copper, colchicine and zinc also potently induced pgp-5 expression (Supplemental Table 2). In general, pgp-5 expression was robustly induced in the intestinal cells of animals exposed to diverse pathogenic bacteria, but the induction was more moderate in animals exposed to several abiotic noxious molecules. PGP-5 is necessary for full resistance to heavy metals and bacterial infections The increase in pgp-5 transcription in response to bacterial infections and toxic compounds suggested that PGP-5 could be involved in protection from these insults. We tested this possibility by analyzing the pgp-5(ok856) mutant, in which a 1 kb region, including exons 11 to 13 that encode the second transmembrane domain is deleted (Supplemental Fig. 1B). Under standard culture conditions, the pgp-5(ok856) mutant was phenotypically wild-type. We assayed the effects of different toxic compounds on the developmental rate of pgp-5 mutant animals at a range of concentrations. In the absence of toxic molecules in the media, the N2 and pgp-5 mutant worms developed at the same rate: close to 100% of the eggs developed into adults in 3 days at 20°C (Fig. 2A–B
We next asked if pgp-5 is required to protect C. elegans from bacterial infections by determining the TDmean of worms infected with PA14 or S. typhimurium SL1344. No significant difference in survival could be detected between wild type and pgp-5 mutants on PA14 (TDmean of 3.15 ± 0.05 days and 3.25 ± 0.05 days, respectively; Log rank test, p > 0.11) and SL1344 (TDmean of 9.4 ± 0.6 days and 10.1 ± 0.5 days, respectively; Log rank test, p > 0.07) when the assays were carried out at 25°C. Because small differences in resistance to bacterial pathogens could be better resolved when infections are carried out at a lower temperature [21], we repeated the infection assays at 15°C. At 15°C, wild-type nematodes infected with PA14 had a TDmean of 13.5 ± 1.7 days, whereas the TDmean for pgp-5 was 10.9 ± 1.0 days (Fig. 2C The induction of pgp-5 in response to infection and heavy metal requires TIR-1 and the p38 MAP kinase signaling cascade The pgp-5 transgenic reporter strain allows us to visualize and quantify pgp-5 induction. Combined with gene knock down by RNAi at later larval stages, thereby avoiding potentially confounding effects of developmentally important genes, this represents a powerful tool to identify in vivo regulatory elements that control pgp-5 expression. Initially, we focused on the nsy-1/sek-1/pmk-1 p38 MAPK cascade, because this module is important for defense against both infection and abiotic stresses [3; 7], and on tir-1, an upstream component of the p38 MAPK pathway in C. elegans immunity [5]. With the exception of tir-1, RNAi knock down of nsy-1, sek-1 and pmk-1 did not significantly affect the basal expression of pgp-5 (Fig. 3A
Next we tested two other MAPK pathways, ERK and JNK. ERK contributes to resistance to rectal infection by M. nematophilum [22], and JNK is required for resistance to heavy metal stress [7]. dsRNA knockdown of mpk-1 (ERK) and mek-1 and kgb-1 (JNK) did not significantly affect the basal expression nor the induction of pgp-5 in response to infection or cadmium stress (Supplemental Fig. 5A–C). Two additional immunity pathways, the TGF-beta [1] and insulin pathways [2], also did not affect pgp-5 induction upon infection (see Supplemental Results). Collectively, the results indicate that the tir-1-p38 MAPK pathway is important for the induction of pgp-5 in response to infection and heavy metal stresses. The tir-1 mRNA can be spliced into at least five isoforms, namely tir-1a-e [23] (Supplemental Fig. 6A). The dsRNA construct used in the previous experiments targets all the isoforms (Supplemental Fig. 6A). To determine if different TIR-1 isoforms play distinct roles in discriminating between infection and heavy metal responses upstream of pgp-5, we generated the tir-1b and tir-1a,c,e isoform-specific dsRNA constructs (Supplemental Fig. 6A). Neither RNAi against the tir-1a,c,e nor the tir-1b isoforms reproduced the significant reduction as obtained by pan-isoform RNAi on the cadmium- and PA14-induced expression of ppgp-5::gfp (Supplemental Fig. 6C and D). As only the pan-isoform tir-1 RNAi significantly reduced the pgp-5 induction by PA14 and heavy metals, we decided to directly test the role of the tir-1 isoforms for resistance to infection. As reported [5], knock-down of all the tir-1 isoforms markedly increased susceptibility to PA14 infection (Fig. 4A
DISCUSSION P-glycoproteins protect many organisms from environmental insults. In C. elegans, the intestinal epithelial cells are the main sites of exchange with the external milieu and potential sites for bacterial colonization. Our results suggest that PGP-5 is part of the machinery necessary to protect C. elegans intestinal cells from certain biotic and abiotic toxins, as do other P-glycoproteins in C. elegans and mammals. Although PGP-5 is required for full resistance to cadmium, its role is minor compared to that of stress response regulators like KGB-1 or MEK-1 [7]. On the other hand, like the C. elegans metallothionein genes, the induction of pgp-5 by heavy metals underscores its potential physiological role in heavy metal detoxification. PGP-5 is also contributes to resistance to bacterial infections and its expression is upregulated by infection. By analogy to PGP-1 and PGP-3, PGP-5 may be directly involved in depotentiating bacterial virulence factor(s) other than phenazines. C. elegans pgp-5 is clustered with 3 highly similar genes, pgp-6, -7 and -8 whose expression are induced during PA14 infection and/or cadmium exposure (Fig. 1 Knocking down nsy-1, sek-1 or pmk-1 function significantly reduced pgp-5 induction by PA14 infection and cadmium. These results support a model in which defense pathways converge on the corresponding MAP3K and MAP2K and diverge downstream of their target p38 MAPK, PMK-1. TIR-1 could be one source of specificity in p38 signaling upstream of NSY-1 and SEK-1. At least 5 major isoforms of tir-1 exist (Supplemental Fig. 6A). The tir-1 locus is complex and the precise expression pattern of each tir-1 isoform remains unknown. The tir-1a,c,e isoforms are involved in the activation of NSY-1 and SEK-1 in specific neurons during development [23]. Our results indicate that these isoforms are not important for resistance to pathogens, but implicate tir-1b in this function. The possibility that tir-1d is important for defense against intestinal infection must await the availability of isoform-specific mutants. Although previous studies have identified genes upregulated by abiotic stress or bacterial infection in C. elegans [1; 16; 17; 18; 19], the ppgp-5::gfp reporter provides the first visual in vivo read-out for response against bacterial infections and abiotic stresses. The pgp-5 transgenic strain should therefore serve as an important tool for systematic dissections of molecular networks responsible for the distinct but overlapping responses to the environment at the level of the whole organism. 01 Click here to view.(136K, pdf) 02 Click here to view.(504K, tif) 03 Click here to view.(1.0M, tif) 04 Click here to view.(365K, tif) 05 Click here to view.(309K, tif) 06 Click here to view.(408K, tif) 07 Click here to view.(288K, tif) Acknowledgments We thank members of the Tan lab, the Stanford C. elegans community and Nathalie Pujol for critical comments, discussions and technical advice; Y. Duverger and S. Scaglione for worm sorting at the C. elegans functional genomics platform of Marseille-Nice genopole®. Some nematode strains were provided by the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center, which is funded by the NIH National Center for Research Resources. This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (MWT) and the Canadian Institute of Health Research (DLB). CLK was supported in part by a Bernard Cohen and a Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale Postdoctoral Fellowships. Footnotes Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. References 1. Mallo GV, Kurz CL, Couillault C, Pujol N, Granjeaud S, Kohara Y, Ewbank JJ. Inducible antibacterial defense system in C. elegans. Curr Biol. 2002;12:1209–14. [PubMed] 2. Garsin DA, Villanueva JM, Begun J, Kim DH, Sifri CD, Calderwood SB, Ruvkun G, Ausubel FM. Long-lived C. elegans daf-2 mutants are resistant to bacterial pathogens. Science. 2003;300:1921. [PubMed] 3. Kim DH, Feinbaum R, Alloing G, Emerson FE, Garsin DA, Inoue H, Tanaka-Hino M, Hisamoto N, Matsumoto K, Tan MW, Ausubel FM. A conserved p38 MAP kinase pathway in Caenorhabditis elegans innate immunity. Science. 2002;297:623–6. [PubMed] 4. Couillault C, Pujol N, Reboul J, Sabatier L, Guichou JF, Kohara Y, Ewbank JJ. TLR-independent control of innate immunity in Caenorhabditis elegans by the TIR domain adaptor protein TIR-1, an ortholog of human SARM. Nat Immunol. 2004;5:488–94. [PubMed] 5. Liberati NT, Fitzgerald KA, Kim DH, Feinbaum R, Golenbock DT, Ausubel FM. Requirement for a conserved Toll/interleukin-1 resistance domain protein in the Caenorhabditis elegans immune response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:6593–8. [PubMed] 6. Kim DH, Liberati NT, Mizuno T, Inoue H, Hisamoto N, Matsumoto K, Ausubel FM. Integration of Caenorhabditis elegans MAPK pathways mediating immunity and stress resistance by MEK-1 MAPK kinase and VHP-1 MAPK phosphatase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:10990–4. [PubMed] 7. Mizuno T, Hisamoto N, Terada T, Kondo T, Adachi M, Nishida E, Kim DH, Ausubel FM, Matsumoto K. The Caenorhabditis elegans MAPK phosphatase VHP-1 mediates a novel JNK-like signaling pathway in stress response. Embo J. 2004 8. Huffman DL, Abrami L, Sasik R, Corbeil J, van der Goot FG, Aroian RV. Mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways defend against bacterial pore-forming toxins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:10995–1000. [PubMed] 9. Schinkel AH, Borst P. Multidrug resistance mediated by P-glycoproteins. Semin Cancer Biol. 1991;2:213–26. [PubMed] 10. Sheps JA, Ralph S, Zhao Z, Baillie DL, Ling V. The ABC transporter gene family of Caenorhabditis elegans has implications for the evolutionary dynamics of multidrug resistance in eukaryotes. Genome Biol. 2004;5:R15. [PubMed] 11. Zhao Z, Sheps JA, Ling V, Fang LL, Baillie DL. Expression analysis of ABC transporters reveals differential functions of tandemly duplicated genes in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Mol Biol. 2004;344:409–17. [PubMed] 12. Schroeder LK, Kremer S, Kramer MJ, Currie E, Kwan E, Watts JL, Lawrenson AL, Hermann GJ. Function of the Caenorhabditis elegans ABC transporter PGP-2 in the biogenesis of a lysosome-related fat storage organelle. Mol Biol Cell. 2007;18:995–1008. [PubMed] 13. Mahajan-Miklos S, Tan MW, Rahme LG, Ausubel FM. Molecular mechanisms of bacterial virulence elucidated using a Pseudomonas aeruginosa-Caenorhabditis elegans pathogenesis model. Cell. 1999;96:47–56. [PubMed] 14. Broeks A, Gerrard B, Allikmets R, Dean M, Plasterk RH. Homologues of the human multidrug resistance genes MRP and MDR contribute to heavy metal resistance in the soil nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Embo J. 1996;15:6132–43. [PubMed] 15. Broeks A, Janssen HW, Calafat J, Plasterk RH. A P-glycoprotein protects Caenorhabditis elegans against natural toxins. Embo J. 1995;14:1858–66. [PubMed] 16. O'Rourke D, Baban D, Demidova M, Mott R, Hodgkin J. Genomic clusters, putative pathogen recognition molecules, and antimicrobial genes are induced by infection of C. elegans with M. nematophilum. Genome Res. 2006;16:1005–16. [PubMed] 17. Shapira M, Hamlin BJ, Rong J, Chen K, Ronen M, Tan MW. A conserved role for a GATA transcription factor in regulating epithelial innate immune responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:14086–91. [PubMed] 18. Troemel ER, Chu SW, Reinke V, Lee SS, Ausubel FM, Kim DH. p38 MAPK regulates expression of immune response genes and contributes to longevity in C. elegans. PLoS Genet. 2006;2:e183. [PubMed] 19. Cui Y, McBride SJ, Boyd WA, Alper S, Freedman JH. Toxicogenomic analysis of Caenorhabditis elegans reveals novel genes and pathways involved in the resistance to cadmium toxicity. Genome Biol. 2007;8:R122. [PubMed] 20. Kurz CL, Ewbank JJ. Caenorhabditis elegans: an emerging genetic model for the study of innate immunity. Nat Rev Genet. 2003;4:380–90. [PubMed] 21. Kurz CL, Chauvet S, Andres E, Aurouze M, Vallet I, Michel GP, Uh M, Celli J, Filloux A, De Bentzmann S, Steinmetz I, Hoffmann JA, Finlay BB, Gorvel JP, Ferrandon D, Ewbank JJ. Virulence factors of the human opportunistic pathogen Serratia marcescens identified by in vivo screening. Embo J. 2003;22:1451–60. [PubMed] 22. Nicholas HR, Hodgkin J. The ERK MAP kinase cascade mediates tail swelling and a protective response to rectal infection in C. elegans. Curr Biol. 2004;14:1256–61. [PubMed] 23. Chuang CF, Bargmann CI. A Toll-interleukin 1 repeat protein at the synapse specifies asymmetric odorant receptor expression via ASK1 MAPKKK signaling. Genes Dev. 2005;19:270–81. [PubMed] |
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||
Curr Biol. 2002 Jul 23; 12(14):1209-14.
[Curr Biol. 2002]Science. 2003 Jun 20; 300(5627):1921.
[Science. 2003]Science. 2002 Jul 26; 297(5581):623-6.
[Science. 2002]Nat Immunol. 2004 May; 5(5):488-94.
[Nat Immunol. 2004]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Apr 27; 101(17):6593-8.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004]Semin Cancer Biol. 1991 Aug; 2(4):213-26.
[Semin Cancer Biol. 1991]Genome Biol. 2004; 5(3):R15.
[Genome Biol. 2004]J Mol Biol. 2004 Nov 19; 344(2):409-17.
[J Mol Biol. 2004]Mol Biol Cell. 2007 Mar; 18(3):995-1008.
[Mol Biol Cell. 2007]Cell. 1999 Jan 8; 96(1):47-56.
[Cell. 1999]Genome Res. 2006 Aug; 16(8):1005-16.
[Genome Res. 2006]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Sep 19; 103(38):14086-91.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006]PLoS Genet. 2006 Nov 10; 2(11):e183.
[PLoS Genet. 2006]Genome Biol. 2007; 8(6):R122.
[Genome Biol. 2007]Nat Rev Genet. 2003 May; 4(5):380-90.
[Nat Rev Genet. 2003]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Sep 19; 103(38):14086-91.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Sep 19; 103(38):14086-91.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Sep 19; 103(38):14086-91.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006]PLoS Genet. 2006 Nov 10; 2(11):e183.
[PLoS Genet. 2006]Cell. 1999 Jan 8; 96(1):47-56.
[Cell. 1999]EMBO J. 2003 Apr 1; 22(7):1451-60.
[EMBO J. 2003]Science. 2002 Jul 26; 297(5581):623-6.
[Science. 2002]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Apr 27; 101(17):6593-8.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004]Curr Biol. 2004 Jul 27; 14(14):1256-61.
[Curr Biol. 2004]Curr Biol. 2002 Jul 23; 12(14):1209-14.
[Curr Biol. 2002]Science. 2003 Jun 20; 300(5627):1921.
[Science. 2003]Genes Dev. 2005 Jan 15; 19(2):270-81.
[Genes Dev. 2005]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Apr 27; 101(17):6593-8.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004]Genes Dev. 2005 Jan 15; 19(2):270-81.
[Genes Dev. 2005]Nat Immunol. 2004 May; 5(5):488-94.
[Nat Immunol. 2004]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Apr 27; 101(17):6593-8.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004]Science. 2002 Jul 26; 297(5581):623-6.
[Science. 2002]Genes Dev. 2005 Jan 15; 19(2):270-81.
[Genes Dev. 2005]Curr Biol. 2002 Jul 23; 12(14):1209-14.
[Curr Biol. 2002]Genome Res. 2006 Aug; 16(8):1005-16.
[Genome Res. 2006]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Sep 19; 103(38):14086-91.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006]PLoS Genet. 2006 Nov 10; 2(11):e183.
[PLoS Genet. 2006]Genome Biol. 2007; 8(6):R122.
[Genome Biol. 2007]