• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of pnasPNASInfo for AuthorsSubscriptionsAboutThis Article
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Jun 23, 1998; 95(13): 7799–7804.
PMCID: PMC22762
Plant Biology

eskimo1 mutants of Arabidopsis are constitutively freezing-tolerant

Abstract

Temperate plants develop a greater ability to withstand freezing in response to a period of low but nonfreezing temperatures through a complex, adaptive process of cold acclimation. Very little is known about the signaling processes by which plants perceive the low temperature stimulus and transduce it into the nucleus to activate genes needed for increased freezing tolerance. To help understand the signaling processes, we have isolated mutants of Arabidopsis that are constitutively freezing-tolerant in the absence of cold acclimation. Freezing tolerance of wild-type Arabidopsis was increased from −5.5°C to −12.6°C by cold acclimation whereas the freezing tolerance of 26 mutant lines ranged from −6.8°C to −10.6°C in the absence of acclimation. Plants with mutations at the eskimo1 (esk1) locus accumulated high levels of proline, a compatible osmolyte, but did not exhibit constitutively increased expression of several cold-regulated genes involved in freezing tolerance. RNA gel blot analysis suggested that proline accumulation in esk1 plants was mediated by regulation of transcript levels of genes involved in proline synthesis and degradation. The characterization of esk1 mutants and results from other mutants suggest that distinct signaling pathways activate different aspects of cold acclimation and that activation of one pathway can result in considerable freezing tolerance without activation of other pathways.

Keywords: cold acclimation, frost tolerance

Freezing temperatures represent a major environmental constraint for all living organisms. For example, frost damage limits the geographical distribution and growing season of many plant species and results in significant crop losses (1, 2). Many tropical and subtropical plants are incapable of surviving freezing. By contrast, most temperate species respond to a period of low but nonfreezing temperatures by developing greater ability to withstand subsequent freezing through a cell-autonomous process of cold acclimation (1). Cold acclimation also occurs in other organisms such as nematodes and insects (3, 4). The extent of increased freezing tolerance achieved varies among species. For example, winter rye improves freezing tolerance from an LT50 (the temperature that kills 50% of plants) of −6°C in nonacclimated plants to −21°C (5), whereas spinach improves from −6 to −10°C (6). Nonacclimated Arabidopsis were killed at −3°C, whereas a 2-day exposure to 4°C increases the freezing tolerance to −10°C (79).

The process of cold acclimation involves numerous physiological and biochemical changes. The most notable changes include reduction or cessation of growth, reduction of tissue water content (1), a transient increase in abscisic acid (ABA) (10), changes in membrane lipid composition (5, 11), and the accumulation of compatible osmolytes such as proline, betaine, and soluble sugars (12, 13). Cold acclimation is associated with complex changes in gene expression (6). Many genes have been cloned by differential screening of cDNA libraries constructed from cold-acclimated plant species (9). Several lines of evidence indicate that some of these genes have roles in freezing tolerance (14, 15). In general, however, there is no clear understanding of the relative importance of each of these activated genes or indeed which are more general responses to low, nonfreezing temperatures but not specifically involved in freezing tolerance. For example, in Arabidopsis transcripts for alcohol dehydrogenase, phenylalanine ammonia-lyase and chalcone synthase are all strongly induced by low temperature, but mutants deficient in these activities are able to cold acclimate as fully as wild type (8, 16). These studies demonstrate that some cold-induced genes are not required for development of freezing tolerance. To understand cold acclimation, it is essential to determine the relative importance of these cold-induced genes in providing increased freezing tolerance.

Determining how cold acclimation is initiated and coordinated is also a challenging task. In broad terms, it can be assumed that a temperature transducer responds to low temperature by activating a signaling pathway, which, in turn, institutes the biochemical and gene expression events needed for increased freezing tolerance. In the last few years, evidence has accumulated to indicate that classical signaling processes, including protein phosphorylation (17, 18), calcium fluxes (19, 20), and hormone action (21, 22), are all involved in activating cold acclimation. However, very little is known about the organization, degree of complexity, or the sequence within the signaling pathway. To address these issues, and to clone genes controlling cold acclimation, we have isolated a series of Arabidopsis mutants that are constitutively freezing tolerant in the absence of any low-temperature treatment. Isolation of these mutants and characterization of one of them, eskimo1, suggest that at least four separate signaling cascades operate in cold acclimation. The mutants offer new tools to investigate the signaling process mediating cold acclimation and will allow cloning of terminal genes critical for freezing tolerance.

METHODS

Petri Dish Freezing Tolerance Assay.

Sterilized Arabidopsis seeds were sown on Petri dishes containing Gamborg basal salts (23) solidified with 0.9% agar. The Petri dishes with seeds were placed at 4°C for 2 days to promote germination and grown at 22°C under 90 μmol quanta m−2[center dot]s−1 continuous light. The freezing test was conducted in the dark. Ten days after germination, Petri dishes of plants were transferred to a chamber set to −1 ± 0.1°C. To achieve uniform freezing, it was necessary to incubate the Petri dishes of plants with ice chips at −1°C for at least 16 hr before further lowering the temperature. In control experiments to establish that this incubation did not induce cold acclimation, the freezing tolerance of wild-type seedlings held in the dark at −1°C was monitored over 2 days. No increase in freezing tolerance was observed at any temperature during the 2 days of treatment. Thus, for all experiments the Petri dishes were maintained at −1°C for 16 hr after the addition of ice crystals before the chamber was programmed to cool at 1°C per hr. The temperature of the culture medium was monitored by a thermocouple. Dishes of plants were removed at desired temperatures, thawed at 4°C for 12 hr in the dark, and then returned to the original growth conditions. Two days later, survival of plants was scored visually.

Mutant Screening.

M2 seeds of ethyl methanesulfonate mutagenized populations of Arabidopsis thaliana ecotype Columbia were either purchased from Lehle Seeds (Round Rock, TX) or generated according to ref. 24. Ten-day-old M2 seedlings grown on Petri dishes were frozen to −8°C as described above, and the Petri dishes were maintained at −8°C for an additional 3 hr before thawing at 4°C. Plants that survived such treatment were transplanted to soil to produce M3 seeds. Constitutive freezing tolerance was retested by using 32 M3 plants.

Electrolyte Leakage Assay.

Wild-type and esk1 seeds were grown on commercial potting mix at 22°C under a diurnal light regime that included 10 hr of illumination at 150 μmol quanta m−2[center dot]s−1. The fourth and fifth leaves from 30-day-old plants were assayed for ion leakage after freezing at various temperatures as described (7, 25).

Genetic Analysis.

To determine the dominance of esk1 mutation, esk1 plants were reciprocally crossed to wild type. Freezing tolerance assays were conducted with 32 F1 plants. To study the segregation of freezing tolerance, one of the resulting F1 hybrids was allowed to self-fertilize, the resulting F2 plants were grown to maturity and the seeds were used to generate F3 families. The genotype of each F2 plant at the esk1 locus was determined by testing the freezing tolerance of 32 F3 seedlings grown on Petri dishes. For genetic mapping of the esk1 mutation, an esk1 plant was crossed to a wild-type plant of the Arabidopsis thaliana Landsberg erecta ecotype and an F1 hybrid was allowed to self-fertilize. A total of 672 F2 plants were used to map esk1 mutation. A single leaf from each F2 plant was sampled and stored at −70°C. After sampling, the plants were self-fertilized to produce F3 seeds. The genotype of each F2 plant at the esk1 locus was determined by testing the freezing tolerance of 32 F3 seedlings derived from the corresponding F2 plant. Genomic DNA from homozygous esk1/esk1 or ESK1/ESK1 plants was extracted according to ref. 26. The chromosome location of esk1 mutation was determined by cosegregation of freezing tolerance with two types of PCR-based polymorphic DNA markers—codominant cleaved amplified polymorphic sequence (CAPS) markers (27) and simple sequence-length polymorphic (SSLP) markers (28).

Proline and Sugar Measurement.

Lyophilized leaf tissue was extracted in 75% ethanol with constant stirring at 4°C for 24 hr. After centrifugation at 20,000 × g for 5 min, an aliquot of the supernatant was dried under vacuum. Amino acids were analyzed with an Amino Acid Analyzer (Bioanalytical Center, Washington State University). The above extract also was used to determine the soluble sugars according to ref. 29.

Osmotic Pressure Determination.

The fourth and fifth leaves from 30-day-old plants were assayed for osmotic pressure of leaf cell sap. The leaves were sampled at the midday and frozen immediately in liquid nitrogen. Cell sap was collected by centrifugation at 20,000 × g for 5 min at 4°C. The osmotic pressure was measured with a Wescor Vapor Pressure Osmometer (Wescor, Logan, UT).

RNA Isolation and Hybridization.

Total RNA was isolated according to ref. 30. Hybridization and washing conditions were the same as described in ref. 31.

Relative Growth Rate.

Plants were grown on commercial potting mix in 4-inch pots under 150 μmol quanta m−2[center dot]s−1 continuous light and 22°C. At 3-day intervals from 4 to 25 days after germination, samples of five plants were harvested and the dry weight of above-ground parts were measured. The relative growth rate was calculated as the slope of the natural logarithm of dry weight versus time in days. To measure the relative growth rate at 4°C, 7-day-old plants were transferred to 4°C. At 7-day intervals between 1 and 63 days after transfer, samples of five plants were harvested and the dry weight of above-ground parts were used to calculate relative growth rate.

RESULTS

Isolation of Mutants.

We established a freezing-survival protocol that can clearly distinguish cold-acclimated from nonacclimated plants by using seedlings of Arabidopsis grown on Petri dishes. In this assay, nonacclimated wild-type seedlings had a LT50 of −5.5°C and were completely killed by freezing at −7°C (Fig. (Fig.11B). After a 2-day acclimation at 4°C, seedlings did not show any visible injury at temperatures above −8°C, 90% of plants survived freezing at −10°C, and 68% of the plants survived freezing at −12°C (Fig. (Fig.11B). This intrinsic ability of Arabidopsis to acclimate and then withstand lower freezing temperatures suggested that it might be possible to discover mutants that are constitutively freezing tolerant in the absence of cold acclimation.

Figure 1
Freezing survival of wild-type and esk1 plants. (A) Nonacclimated wild-type (Left) and esk1 plants were frozen at −8°C under the protocol described under Methods. (B) Percent survival of nonacclimated and acclimated plants after freezing ...

From ethyl methanesulfonate-mutagenized populations of Arabidopsis, 800,000 plants were screened for their ability to survive freezing at −8°C, which reliably killed nonacclimated wild-type plants. The plants that survived this freezing treatment were transferred to soil to produce M3 seeds. The constitutive freezing tolerance of each line was measured again with 32 M3 plants. Mutants confirmed in this way were backcrossed to wild-type plants and reselected from the resulting F2 progeny. After several rounds of screening and selection, we obtained 26 mutant lines that demonstrated heritable increases in constitutive freezing tolerance. Allelism tests among the first nine lines demonstrated that they represent mutations at six separate loci. One of these mutants, designated eskimo1 (esk1), was chosen for detailed analysis. A second allele at this locus, esk1–2, was subsequently isolated from an independently mutagenized population. All the characteristics of the esk1–1 mutants described here also have been demonstrated in esk1–2 plants.

Genetic Analysis of esk1.

To determine the genetic basis of the esk1 mutation, esk1 plants were reciprocally crossed to wild type. Resulting F1 seedlings from either cross were freezing-sensitive like the wild type, indicating that the esk1 mutation is recessive. One of the resulting F1 hybrids was allowed to self-fertilize to produce F2 seeds, which were planted individually to generate 167 F3 families. When 32 seedlings from each F3 family were tested for constitutive freezing tolerance, it was found that 41 families showed 100% survival, 80 families showed 18–30% survival, and 46 families showed no surviving individuals. This ratio is a good fit to the Mendelian expectation of 1:2:1 (χ2 = 0.59, P = 0.75) for a single recessive mutation. The esk1 mutation was mapped to 71.4 ± 0.3 cM on chromosome 3 between CAPS markers TT5 and BGL1 on the Recombinant Inbred Map of Lister and Dean updated on October 2, 1997 (http://genome-www.stanford.edu/Arabidopsis/ww/Vol4ii).

Freezing Tolerance of Wild-Type and esk1 Plants.

When wild-type and esk1–1 plants were grown side by side and then frozen to −8°C without acclimation, all the wild type were killed whereas none of the esk1 plants showed significant damage (Fig. (Fig.11A). Mutant plants were capable of continued growth after freezing and completed their life cycle. In the same experiment, 2 days of cold acclimation at 4°C allowed 100% survival of both wild-type and esk1 plants after freezing to −8°C (not shown). To determine the extent of freezing tolerance that is constitutively activated in esk1 mutants, samples of plants grown on agar were frozen to temperatures ranging from −4°C to −16°C (Fig. (Fig.11B). These experiments indicated that nonacclimated wild-type showed 50% survival at a temperature of −5.5°C. Full acclimation of wild-type plants increased survival to −12.6°C whereas nonacclimated esk1 plants showed 50% survival at −10.6°C. These results indicate that esk1 mutation has instituted approximately 70% of the freezing tolerance generated by full acclimation of wild-type Arabidopsis. Interestingly, cold acclimation of esk1 plants increased their tolerance beyond that of acclimated wild type to −14.8°C, indicating that other signaling pathways, in addition to the one constitutively activated in esk1 plants, are also likely to be involved in cold acclimation.

When the freezing tolerance of plants grown on soil was measured using an ion leakage assay, the temperature causing 50% ion leakage was −7.9°C for esk1 compared with −2.8°C for nonacclimated wild type. The extent of improved freezing tolerance, 5.1°C, was the same as that observed in plants grown on agar in Petri dishes, although the absolute temperatures are higher than those derived from plant survival on agar media. To date, experiments with six other, nonallelic mutants have demonstrated increases in constitutive freezing tolerance ranging from 1.3°C to 5.1°C.

When grown at 22°C under continuous light, esk1 plants were darker green in color and more compact in stature than wild type (Fig. (Fig.22A). Measurements of shoot dry weight accumulation under these conditions yielded relative growth rates of 0.338 ± 0.025 and 0.262 ± 0.012 (mean ± SE) for wild type and mutant, respectively. Despite these differences, the mutant retained a normal pattern and chronology of development with germination, flowering, and seed development after similar timing to wild type (Fig. (Fig.22A). Interestingly, darker color and more compact growth are characteristic of wild-type Arabidopsis grown at temperatures (c. 4°C) that induce cold acclimation. Indeed, growth at 4°C produced wild-type and mutant plants that were indistinguishable both in appearance (Fig. (Fig.22B) and growth rate (0.062 ± 0.004 and 0.064 ± 0.005 for wild type and mutant, respectively). These morphological features of the esk1 phenotype cosegregated with freezing tolerance during backcrossing experiments and also were identical in an independently isolated esk1–2 mutant. We conclude that the esk1 mutations have pleiotropic effects that may reflect, to some extent, changes that occur in wild-type plants during cold acclimation.

Figure 2
Growth habits of wild-type (Left) and esk1 plants. (A) Plants grown for 30 days at 22°C under 150 μmol quanta m−2[center dot]s−1 continuous light. (B) Plants grown for 7 days at 22°C and then for 60 days at 4°C ...

Freezing Tolerance in esk1 Does Not Depend on Expression of Four COR Genes.

Differential screening techniques have identified genes that are induced during cold acclimation. The most strongly induced of these cold-regulated genes in Arabidopsis include COR6.6, COR15a, RAB18, COR47, and COR78 (9). The precise roles of these genes in cold acclimation remain unknown, and several of them are induced by both drought and abscisic acid, as well as by low temperature (22). This suggests that they may help to protect cells during dehydration, which is a major component of freezing stress. Constitutive expression of the COR15a gene in transgenic Arabidopsis has been shown to provide some increase in freezing tolerance to chloroplasts and protoplasts derived from nonacclimated plants (14).

To determine whether expression of these cold-regulated genes contributes to the constitutive freezing tolerance of esk1 plants, mRNA levels corresponding to the five genes were assayed by gel blot analysis. Only one of the genes, RAB18, showed significant constitutive expression in esk1 plants (Fig. (Fig.3).3). The remaining genes showed very strong induction (ranging from 25- to 100-fold) after cold acclimation of either wild-type or esk1 plants, but transcript levels in nonacclimated esk1 plants were essentially the same as in wild-type controls. Thus, the extensive freezing tolerance achieved in the esk1 mutants does not depend on high levels of COR gene expression.

Figure 3
Gel-blot analysis of transcripts from five cold-regulated genes in wild-type (WT) and esk1 Arabidopsis. Plants were grown at 22°C under 150 μmol quanta m−2[center dot]s−1. Total RNA (10 μg) isolated from leaf tissue ...

Accumulation of Free Proline Is One Aspect of the esk1 Phenotype.

Proline is one of several compounds that act as compatible osmolytes to ameliorate the effect of dehydration that occurs during freezing and drought stress (32). Increases in proline content occur in many plant species during cold acclimation (13). In our experiments, cold acclimation of wild-type plants resulted in a 10-fold increase in free proline from 4.3 to 47.0 μmol[center dot]g−1 dry wt (Fig. (Fig.44A), and such data are comparable with those obtained in other studies of cold acclimation (13) and drought stress (33, 34). By contrast, esk1 plants constitutively maintained proline at more than 150 μmol[center dot]g−1 dry wt and did not show any increase after cold acclimation. Analyses showed that levels of other amino acids in the mutant remained close to those in wild-type plants, indicating that constitutive accumulation of proline as a compatible solute indeed may be a component of freezing tolerance in the mutant. We also determined the levels of soluble sugars, another class of compatible osmolytes, and the osmotic pressure of leaf cell sap in wild-type and esk1 plants. The level of soluble sugar was found constitutively in leaf tissue of esk1 was 5.9 mg[center dot]g−1 fresh wt compared with only 2.3 mg[center dot]g−1 fresh wt for wild-type controls. The osmotic pressure of leaf cell sap was −1.41 MPa in esk1 compared with −0.80 MPa in wild-type plants.

Figure 4
Proline accumulation and expression of proline metabolism genes in wild-type (WT) and esk1 Arabidopsis. (A) Proline levels in nonacclimated plants (open bars), in plants cold acclimated at 4°C for 2 days (shaded bars), and in plants 10 hr after ...

The esk1 Mutation Affects the Expression of Genes Controlling Proline Synthesis and Degradation.

In plants, proline levels are maintained by transcriptional regulation of both synthesis and degradation (32, 33). The first committing step in proline synthesis is catalyzed by the enzyme Δ1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase (P5CS). Consistent with the accumulation of free proline in cold-acclimated wild-type plants, the expression of P5CS transcript was increased 3-fold in these plants compared with nonacclimated controls (Fig. (Fig.44B). Without acclimation esk1 plants exhibited an 8-fold higher level of transcript than nonacclimated wild type (Fig. (Fig.44B). After acclimation, the P5CS transcript was not increased in esk1 plants, but instead was slightly decreased.

Proline is degraded through proline oxidase (32, 33), which is encoded by AtPOX genes in Arabidopsis (34). The AtPOX genes are normally induced by proline (34, 35). However, the transcript abundance of AtPOX were similar in esk1 mutants and wild-type plants even though esk1 plants accumulate free proline to a level 30-fold higher than nonacclimated wild type (Fig. (Fig.4).4). This suggests that the esk1 mutation acts to prevent the induction of AtPOX genes by proline. To test this possibility, soil-grown wild-type and esk1 plants were supplied with exogenous proline by directly watering plants with 100 mM proline solution. Such treatment increased free proline in wild-type plants to a level about one-third of that as observed in esk1 plants (Fig. (Fig.44A) and induced a significant increase in the abundance of AtPOX transcript. However, the same treatment only slightly increased AtPOX transcript in the esk1 mutant. We also observed that AtPOX transcript was increased during cold acclimation in both wild-type and esk1 plants.

DISCUSSION

Cold acclimation involves changes in many different cellular processes. To dissect the signaling pathways mediating the complex changes that result in increased freezing tolerance, we have isolated 26 mutants with enhanced freezing tolerance in the absence of cold acclimation. Complementation tests with the first nine mutants identified six separate loci. This suggests that the 26 mutants we have isolated may represent 12–15 different genes, which, when mutated, result in constitutive increases in freezing tolerance. Most mutant lines are represented only by one or two alleles, suggesting that the screen has not been saturated. The freezing assay that we have developed will facilitate the screen of more mutagenized populations to approach saturation. Characterization of the existing 26 mutant lines and isolation of additional mutants should lead eventually to a broader understanding of all aspects of cold acclimation. The particular focus of this investigation was a mutation at the esk1 locus that provides a constitutive increase in freezing tolerance of 5.1°C, which compares with a 7.1°C increase observed in fully acclimated wild-type plants. When esk1 plants were cold acclimated, they became 9.3°C more freezing tolerant than nonacclimated wild-type plants.

Free proline increases in plants in response to many stresses (32). However, its role in stress tolerance remains equivocal. Here, we provided evidence that proline is a factor contributing to increased freezing tolerance. Proline content increased in wild type during cold acclimation (Fig. (Fig.44A), and similar increases have been reported in other plant species (13, 32). In the absence of acclimation, both esk1–1 and esk1–2 plants accumulated similar amounts of free proline, indicating that accumulation of proline was caused by esk1 mutation rather than another closely linked but unrelated mutation. We have measured proline levels in five other, nonallelic lines derived from our mutant screen. Of these, two lines showed constitutive proline levels of 163 and 188 μmol[center dot]g−1 dry wt, whereas the remaining three lines showed proline levels similar to nonacclimated wild type. These results strongly suggested that proline does play an important role in plant freezing tolerance. However, in the mutants that did not accumulate proline, the levels of constitutive freezing tolerance ranged from 3° to 5°C better than nonacclimated wild type. Thus, although proline accumulation may be a component of constitutive freezing tolerance in some mutants, it is not essential for the considerable freezing tolerance observed in others. For the esk1 mutation, the accumulation of free proline (150 μmol[center dot]g−1 dry wt) accounted for about 2% of total dry matter. There appears to be a recognizable penalty associated with the accumulation of free proline and increase in constitutive freezing tolerance in esk1 mutants. However, several other mutants derived from our screen are similar to wild type in growth and appearance. Apparently, it is possible to achieve an increase in constitutive freezing tolerance without significantly compromising growth at higher temperatures.

The high levels of proline found in esk1 plants would normally induce the AtPOX gene and result in increased breakdown of this amino acid (33, 34). A much lower concentration of proline in wild-type plants supplied with exogenous proline led to a 6-fold increase at AtPOX transcript. Thus, the esk1 mutation leads to the activation of P5CS and the accumulation of proline while also preventing the induction of AtPOX. The esk1 mutation does not map to any of the P5CS or AtPOX loci (3436), indicating that ESK1 may be a regulatory component of cold acclimation. We consider it unlikely that proline accumulation is the only process controlled by the signaling pathway involving ESK1. The increased RAB18 transcript levels, accumulation of soluble sugars, and decreased osmotic pressure in the mutant are all consistent with this view. Given our incomplete knowledge of the biochemical processes that contribute to freezing tolerance, it will require considerable effort with the mutants and with other approaches to define all the additional processes involved. However, if the esk1 mutation is specifically activating a suite of genes contributing to increased freezing tolerance, it is likely that the mutants will facilitate the identification of these genes by differential screening strategies while reducing interference from genes that are induced by low temperature but not involved in freezing tolerance.

The recessive nature of the esk1 mutation suggests that the wild-type ESK1 protein normally functions as a negative regulator to repress P5CS expression and other responses in the absence of low-temperature signals. Mutations at esk1 apparently disrupt the repressor activity and result in hyperactivation of proline synthesis and other processes controlled by the ESK1 pathway. Presumably, presence of active ESK1 protein is also required for proline to induce the AtPOX gene at warm temperatures. Cloning of the ESK1 gene may help elucidate the dual function of the ESK1 protein in repressing P5CS and allowing proline-induced activation of the AtPOX genes. We currently have no rationale for the low-temperature induction of AtPOX transcript in both wild-type and esk1 plants, but a similar induction has been observed in the early stages of drought stress before any detectable increase in proline (35).

Transcript levels of RAB18 in nonacclimated esk1 plants showed a consistent 3- to 4-fold increase compared with wild-type controls. Although cold acclimation of esk1 led to a further 3-fold induction of RAB18, the data nevertheless suggest that increased RAB18 expression is one aspect of the esk1 phenotype. By contrast, four other cold-regulated genes (COR6.6, COR15a, COR47, and COR78) exhibited no constitutive increase in expression in mutant plants but instead showed normal induction after 2 days at 4°C. Previous work has demonstrated that overexpression of the COR15a gene in Arabidopsis provides for increased freezing protection of chloroplasts and protoplasts derived from nonacclimated transgenic plants compared with untransformed controls (14). More recently, a transcription factor, CBF1, that binds to cis-acting regulatory elements within the COR15a and COR78 promoters has been cloned by using a yeast “one-hybrid” strategy (37). Overexpression of CBF1 driven by a strong, constitutive promoter activated COR6.6, COR15a, COR47, and COR78 at normal temperatures in transgenic Arabidopsis plants and resulted in increased freezing tolerance in the absence of cold acclimation (15). These findings indicate that some of the COR gene products are important in freezing tolerance. It is likely that increased expression of the COR genes contributes to the additional 4.2°C increase in freezing tolerance that occurs upon cold acclimation of esk1 mutant plants.

Taken together, our results indicate that it is not appropriate to consider cold acclimation as a simple, linear signaling pathway activating the full set of processes required for increased freezing tolerance. Instead, we propose a model for cold acclimation in which parallel or branched signaling pathways activate distinct suites of cold-acclimation responses. Constitutive activation of one of these pathways can result in considerable freezing tolerance without support from other components. Previous studies have shown that the expression of COR genes is controlled by both ABA-dependent and ABA-independent signal pathways (21, 22, 38). Because esk1 plants do not overexpress any of the four major COR genes at 22°C, esk1 apparently defines another signaling pathway of cold acclimation distinct from those that mediate the expression of COR genes. Several mutant lines from our screen neither accumulate proline nor activate the COR genes (unpublished results); they must define additional pathways that are distinct from the three described above. Hence, the minimum number of separate signaling pathways involved in cold acclimation is four, and further studies of the mutants may identify additional pathways.

The complexity of cold-acclimation signaling that we propose here is consistent with the results of Ishitani et al. (38), who identified mutations that influence differentially the effect of ABA, drought, cold, and salt stress on the activity of the COR78 (=RD29A) promoter. Recently, Warren et al. (25) isolated seven nonallelic sfr (sensitive to freezing) mutants of Arabidopsis, which acquire only partial freezing tolerance after acclimation. Consistent with the notion that multiple signal pathways are involved in cold acclimation, most of the sfr mutants retain more than 50% capacity to cold acclimate. Epistasis analysis of these sfr mutants to our constitutively freezing tolerant mutants will greatly extend our ability to genetically define the signaling networks controlling cold acclimation.

An intriguing and very pertinent observation from our studies is that cold acclimation of esk1 produces plants that are more than 2°C more freezing tolerant than acclimated wild type (Fig. (Fig.11B). It is possible that wild-type Arabidopsis could be induced to exhibit higher levels of tolerance by a more extensive acclimation regime. However, studies by us and by others (7, 8, 11, 12) have not provided evidence for such a possibility. Thus, the increased tolerance resulting from cold acclimation of esk1 is consistent with the concept of multiple signaling pathways discussed above but also suggests that mutations at ESK1 may hyperactivate the signaling pathway in which this gene is involved. This explanation implies that cold-acclimation signaling may have evolved to modulate the level of freezing tolerance so that it is sufficient for the conditions found within the geographic range of a given ecotype without limiting the plant’s competitiveness. Such a hypothesis implies that it may be possible to improve freezing tolerance by increased activation of preexisting pathways of cold acclimation.

At present, it is unclear which genes or biochemical processes are essential to the development of freezing tolerance and which are general responses to low, nonfreezing temperatures but are not required for freezing tolerance. Except for the induction of a few COR genes, the signal cascades mediating most aspects of cold acclimation, such as increases in ABA, synthesis of compatible osmolytes, and changes in membrane lipid composition, are unknown. The isolation of a series of constitutively freezing tolerant mutants now opens new routes to study the processes required for freezing tolerance and to identify components of the signaling pathways that mediate these processes.

Acknowledgments

We thank Sarah Bradford and Sarah Henry for help with the mutant screen; Tapio Palva, Kazuo Shinozaki, and Michael Thomashow for cDNA clones; and Paul Li, Kay Simmons, Jim Tokuhisa, and Jim Wallis for helpful discussions. This work was supported by a fellowship from the U.S. National Science Foundation (to Z.X.), by a grant from the U.S. National Science Foundation (IBN-9407902), and by the Agricultural Research Center, Washington State University.

ABBREVIATIONS

ABA
abscisic acid
LT50
lethal temperature (50)
P5CS
Δ1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthase

References

1. Levitt J. Responses of Plants to Environmental Stresses. Orlando: Academic; 1980. , 497 pp.
2. Boyer J S. Science. 1982;218:443–448. [PubMed]
3. Brown I M, Gaugler R. J Thermal Biol. 1996;21:115–121.
4. Kostal V, Simek P. J Insect Physiol. 1996;42:727–733.
5. Webb M S, Uemura M, Steponkus P L. Plant Physiol. 1994;104:467–478. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
6. Guy C L, Niemi K J, Brambl R. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1985;82:3673–3677. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Gilmour S J, Hajela R K, Thomashow M F. Plant Physiol. 1988;87:745–750. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. Leyva A, Jarillo J A, Salinas J, Martinez Zapater J M. Plant Physiol. 1995;108:39–46. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Thomashow M F. In: Arabidopsis. Meyerowitz E M, Somerville C R, editors. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Lab. Press; 1994. pp. 807–834.
10. Chen H-H, Brenner M L, Li P H. Plant Physiol. 1983;71:362–365. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Uemura M, Joseph R A, Steponkus P L. Plant Physiol. 1995;109:15–30. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Ristic Z, Ashworth E N. Protoplasma. 1993;172:111–123.
13. Koster K L, Lynch D V. Plant Physiol. 1992;98:108–113. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Artus N N, Uemura M, Steponkus P L, Gilmour S J, Lin C, Thomashow M F. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:13404–13409. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Jaglo-Ottosen K R, Gilmour S J, Zarka D G, Schabenberger O, Thomashow M F. Science. 1998;280:104–106. [PubMed]
16. Jarillo J A, Leyva A, Salinas J, Martinez Zapater J M. Plant Physiol. 1993;101:833–837. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Anderberg R J, Walker-Simmons M K. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992;89:10183–10187. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Jonak C, Kiegerl S, Ligterink W, Barker P J, Huskisson N S, Hirt H. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:11274–11279. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Knight H, Trewavas A J, Knight M R. Plant Cell. 1996;8:489–503. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Monroy A F, Dhindsa R S. Plant Cell. 1995;7:321–331. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Nordin K, Heino P, Tapio Palva E. Plant Mol Biol. 1991;16:1061–1071. [PubMed]
22. Gilmour S J, Thomashow M F. Plant Mol Biol. 1991;17:1233–1240. [PubMed]
23. Gamborg O L, Miller R A, Ojima K. Exp Cell Res. 1968;50:151–158. [PubMed]
24. Browse J A, McCourt P, Somerville C R. Science. 1985;227:763–765. [PubMed]
25. Warren G, McKown R, Marin A, Teutonico R. Plant Physiol. 1996;111:1011–1019. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Klimyuk V I, Carroll B J, Thomas C M, Jones J D. Plant J. 1993;3:493–494. [PubMed]
27. Konieczny A, Ausubel F M. Plant J. 1993;4:403–410. [PubMed]
28. Bell C J, Ecker J R. Genomics. 1994;19:137–144. [PubMed]
29. Dubois M, Gilles K A, Hamilton J K, Rebers P A, Smith F. Anal Chem. 1956;28:350–356.
30. Verwoerd T C, Dekker B M, Hoekema A. Nucleic Acids Res. 1989;17:2362. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
31. Amasino R M. Anal Biochem. 1986;152:304–307. [PubMed]
32. Delauney A J, Verma D P S. Plant J. 1993;4:215–223.
33. Peng Z, Lu Q, Verma D P. Mol Gen Genet. 1996;253:334–341. [PubMed]
34. Verbruggen N, Hua X J, May M, Van Montagu M. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:8787–8791. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
35. Kiyosue T, Yoshiba Y, Yamaguchi Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K. Plant Cell. 1996;8:1323–1335. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
36. Strizhov N, Abraham E, Okresz L, Blickling S, Zilberstein A, Schell J, Koncz C, Szabados L. Plant J. 1997;12:557–569. [PubMed]
37. Stockinger E J, Gilmour S J, Thomashow M F. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:1035–1040. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
38. Ishitani M, Xiong L, Stevenson B, Zhu J K. Plant Cell. 1997;9:1935–1949. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences
PubReader format: click here to try

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...