![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||
An Important Role for the Multienzyme Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetase Complex in Mammalian Translation and Cell Growth Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA *Contact: mdeutsch/at/med.miami.edu SUMMARY In mammalian cells, aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) are organized into a high molecular weight multisynthetase complex whose cellular function has remained a mystery. In this study, we have taken advantage of the fact that mammalian cells contain two forms of ArgRS, both products of the same gene, to investigate the complex’s physiological role. The data indicate that the high molecular weight form of ArgRS, which is present exclusively as an integral component of the multisynthetase complex, is essential for normal protein synthesis and growth of CHO cells even when low molecular weight, free ArgRS is present and Arg-tRNA continues to be synthesized at close to wild type levels. Based on these observations, we conclude that Arg-tRNA generated by the synthetase complex is a more efficient precursor for protein synthesis than Arg-tRNA generated by free ArgRS, exactly as would be predicted by the channeling model for mammalian translation. INTRODUCTION In mammalian cells, aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) are organized into a high molecular mass multisynthetase complex (Han et al., 2003; Lee et al., 2004). Although the number of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases in the complex in vivo is unclear, a stable core of at least nine synthetases and three additional non-synthetase accessory proteins (p43, p38 and p18) can be isolated reproducibly (Mirande et al., 1985; Kerjan et al., 1994). Multisynthetase complexes with many fewer components than the mammalian one also exist in lower organisms such as Haloarcula marismortui (Goldgur and Safro, 1994), Methanococcus jannaschii (Lipman et al., 2000; Lipman et al., 2003), and Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Simos et al., 1996). Nevertheless, despite extensive study since its initial discovery over 35 years ago (Bandyopadhyay and Deutscher, 1971), the cellular function of the multisynthetase complex remains a mystery. It is known that removal of Arc1p, a yeast p43 homolog, leads to slowed growth and reduced MetRS activity (Simos el al., 1996; Deinert et al., 2001), and also that mutation of mammalian p38 results in loss of structural integrity of the multisynthetase complex and mouse neonatal death (Kim et al., 2002; Kim et al., 2003), suggesting that the role of the synthetase complex is important. Among the mammalian aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, ArgRS is unique in that two forms of this enzyme are present within a cell (Deutscher and Ni, 1982; Vellekamp et al., 1985; Cirakoglu and Waller, 1985). One form is ~ 72-kDa, and is found exclusively as an integral component of the multisynthetase complex. The second form of ArgRS is ~60-kDa, and exists free in cell extracts. It lacks the 12-kDa, N-terminal, hydrophobic extension characteristic of the larger form, known to be responsible for the latter’s association with the multisynthetase complex. Both forms of the enzyme display similar catalytic properties in vitro (Vellekamp et al., 1985; Lazard et al., 2000). Northern blot analysis indicates that the two forms of ArgRS are derived from a single transcript, but utilize alternate AUG initiation codons (Lazard and Mirande, 1993; Girjes et al., 1995; Zheng et al., 2006). Our laboratory has proposed a model to explain the need for two forms of ArgRS in a single cell (Sivaram and Deutscher, 1990). In contrast to other aminoacyl-tRNAs, mammalian cells utilize Arg-tRNA for two discrete functions - protein synthesis and post-translational modification carried out by arginyl-tRNA protein transferase which arginylates the -NH2 terminus of certain proteins (Ferber and Ciechanover, 1987), a modification that serves as a signal for ubiquitin-dependent protein degradation. The model proposes that Arg-tRNA generated by the high molecular weight form of ArgRS, as part of the multisynthetase complex, is used for protein synthesis, whereas Arg-tRNA generated by the free form of ArgRS is used for the protein transferase reaction. One important corollary of this model is that the two pools of Arg-tRNA generated in this fashion remain separate, as that would appear to be the only apparent reason for needing distinct forms of ArgRS. This conclusion led to the concept of channeling of aminoacyl-tRNAs for protein synthesis (Sivaram and Deutscher, 1990). However, although channeling of aminoacyl-tRNA was subsequently confirmed by a variety of experimental approaches (Negrutskii and Deutscher, 1991; Negrutskii and Deutscher, 1992; Negrutskii et al., 1994; Stapulionis and Deutscher, 1995), the original suggestion that the multisynthetase complex is required to generate aminoacyl-tRNAs channeled for protein synthesis has not been verified. In this paper, we take advantage of the existence of the two forms of ArgRS, and of stable clones deficient in one or the other form, to show that the high molecular mass ArgRS is essential for normal growth and protein synthesis in mammalian cells even when the necessary arginyl-tRNA can still be synthesized by the low molecular mass enzyme. This work demonstrates for the first time a direct role for the multisynthetase complex in mammalian translation, and further emphasizes the importance of aminoacyl-tRNA channeling in the translation process. RESULTS Properties of Arg-1 Mutant CHO Cells In order to assess the growth potential and synthetase activity of cells containing only a single form of ArgRS, it was desirable to carry out experiments in a background that would minimally affect such measurements. For this purpose, we made use of the Arg-1 CHO mutant which is known to exhibit temperature-sensitive growth and diminished ArgRS activity relative to the parental Gat- strain (Thompson et al., 1977; Thompson et al., 1978) due to a Cys to Tyr substitution at position 599 in ArgRS (Lazard et al., 2000). We have confirmed that the Arg-1 mutant shows marked growth inhibition at 40°C, that it displays slightly slower growth at 34°C, and that its ArgRS activity is reduced ~80% at 40°C (data not shown). To reduce mutant cell growth even further, cells were cultured in a customized F-12 medium that contains no arginine and is supplemented with dialyzed, rather than normal, fetal bovine serum. As shown in Figure 1
Construction of Mutant Cells Expressing a Single Form of ArgRS Earlier work showed that the two forms of ArgRS arise from a single mRNA through the utilization of alternative AUG initiation codons (Lazard and Mirande, 1993; Girjes et al., 1995) (Figure 2
ArgRS Activity in Mutant Cells Assay of ArgRS activity in S10 extracts from the selected clones revealed that each of the clones of a particular type (WT, Mut1 or Mut2) had essentially identical activity (data not shown). Thus, only one clone of each type was chosen for detailed examination. An equal amount of S10 extract (30 μg) was assayed in each case following a 45 min preincubation at 40°C to first inactivate the thermosensitive ArgRS activity derived from the Arg-1 cell background. Consequently, any ArgRS activity observed would result from the transfected argRS genes. The data presented in Figure 3
To confirm this conclusion, and to directly determine the amount of each form of ArgRS present in each of the strains, S10 cell extracts were fractionated on a Sephacryl S-300 gel filtration column, and the fractions assayed for ArgRS activity. As is well known, cells normally contain two forms of ArgRS, one eluting in the void volume of a gel filtration column as part of the multisynthetase complex, and one corresponding to the free form at a molecular mass of ~60 kDa (e.g. Deutscher and Ni, 1982; Mirande et al., 1985; Sivaram and Deutscher, 1990). Western blot analysis indicates that the complex contains exclusively ArgRS of ~72 kDa, whereas the late-eluting activity is exclusively low molecular weight ArgRS (Nathanson and Deutscher, 2000). As shown in Figure 4A
These data demonstrate that each form of ArgRS is dependent on a distinct AUG codon for translation initiation, and that the ArgRS proteins expressed as a result of transfection distribute either in the multisynthetase complex or as the free form exactly as predicted from their structure. Most importantly, the availability of a stable, mutant clone expressing only the free form of ArgRS enabled us to assess the role of the multisynthetase complex in vivo. Growth of Mutant Cells As shown above (Figure 1
Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetases and Aminoacyl-tRNAs in Mutant Cells To examine in more detail the basis of the poor growth phenotype, aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases and aminoacyl-tRNAs in Mut1 cells were analyzed. Since these mutant cells do not have an active, complexed form of ArgRS, we first examined whether the multisynthetase complex itself remained intact and active. S-10 supernatant fractions from WT, Mut1 and Mut2 cells were each subjected to gel filtration on Sephacryl S-300 columns and analyzed for LeuRS, LysRS and AspRS activity, three enzymes known to be part of the complex. These experiments showed that despite the absence of an active ArgRS, the multisynthetase complex remained intact and that each of the three synthetases retained full activity in Mut1 cells (data not shown). A portion of cellular tRNA is found associated with the multisynthetase complex following gel filtration (Bandyopadhyay and Deutscher, 1971). This amounted to 46% in wild type CHO cells (data not shown). In Arg-1 cells transfected with the WT argRS construct, this portion amounted to 43% of total tRNAArg (average of 3 experiments). A similar value of 37% was found in cells transfected with the Mut2 gene. However, only 20% of tRNAArg was associated with the complex in Mut1 cells. These data indicate that only about half as much tRNAArg is stably bound to the multisynthetase complex in the absence of an active ArgRS. Protein synthesis is dependent on charged tRNAs. Therefore, it was of considerable interest to determine the level of tRNA arginylation in vivo in the various cells under study (Table 1). This was done using the periodate oxidation technique (Rizzino et al., 1974; Andrulis et al., 1979). The total amount of tRNAArg in each of the four cell lines examined was essentially identical (Table 1). Based on periodate oxidation, both wild type CHO cells and the WT clone were found to be aminoacylated with arginine to ~90%, in agreement with other measurements in mammalian cells. In contrast, the level of arginylation was significantly reduced in the mutant clones, amounting to 78% in cells expressing only the complexed, high molecular weight ArgRS, and 68% in cells expressing only the free form. Thus, elimination of either of the two forms of ArgRS does lead to a decrease in the amount of arginyl-tRNA in vivo, although the extent of reduction is relatively modest. Most importantly, these data show that even though arginyl-tRNA continues to be made in the Mut1 cell at approximately 75% of normal levels (68÷90%) by the free ArgRS, growth is dramatically reduced, supporting the conclusion that for efficient protein synthesis, arginyl-tRNA must be generated by the ArgRS present in the multisynthetase complex.
Channeling of Aminoacyl-tRNA for Protein Synthesis in Mutant Cells That arginyl-tRNA must be generated by complexed ArgRS for efficient translation is exactly what would be predicted by the channeling model of mammalian translation. In this model, which has been verified experimentally, aminoacyl-tRNA generated within the translation apparatus is preferentially utilized for protein synthesis compared to exogenous aminoacyl-tRNA added to cells by electroporation (Negrutskii and Deutscher, 1991) or through use of permeabilized cells (Negrutskii and Deutscher, 1992; Negrutskii et al., 1994; Stapulionis and Deutscher, 1995). In the current situation, we propose that arginyl-tRNA synthesized by the free form of ArgRS, although generated within the cell, also is exogenous to the translation apparatus leading to less efficient utilization for protein synthesis and to slower growth. To test this idea directly, the various transfected cells were permeabilized with saponin, labeled with [3H]-amino acids, and aminoacyl-tRNA levels and protein synthesis measured, as described previously (Negrutskii and Deutscher, 1992; Negrutskii et al., 1994; Stapulionis and Deutscher, 1995). As a control for a true exogenous substrate, the corresponding [14C]-aminoacyl-tRNAs were added and protein synthesis measured. The amount of [14C]-exogenous aminoacyl-tRNA added was adjusted to be equal to that of the endogenous aminoacyl-tRNA. The data for this experiment are presented in Figure 6
DISCUSSION The existence of two forms of ArgRS in a single cell, each of which could be eliminated by mutation, as well as the availability of the Arg-1 CHO cell mutant, provided the ideal system to examine the biosynthesis of the two forms of ArgRS, to ascertain their contribution to overall ArgRS activity, and to elucidate their functional roles. Moreover, the presence of a thermosensitive and hyperauxotrophic ArgRS in the Arg-1 cell background enabled us to completely eliminate any involvement by the endogenous ArgRS. Thus, using this system, we were able to clearly show that both forms of ArgRS are independently expressed in cells, that their synthesis is dependent on translation from two separate initiation codons, and that in CHO cell extracts each form of ArgRS contributes about half of the total ArgRS activity. Most importantly, these studies revealed that the two forms of ArgRS are functionally distinct. In earlier work (Sivaram and Deutscher, 1990), our laboratory predicted that the two forms of ArgRS would be separate translation products and that the high molecular weight form would be used to generate Arg-tRNA for translation, whereas the low molecular weight ArgRS would generate Arg-tRNA for N-terminal arginylation of certain proteins. In addition, based on these predictions, it was suggested that the Arg-tRNA generated by the two forms of ArgRS would not mix, leading to the concept of aminoacyl-tRNA channeling during translation (Sivaram and Deutscher, 1990), an idea that was subsequently confirmed by experiment (Negrutskii and Deutscher, 1991; Negrutskii and Deutscher, 1992; Negrutskii et al., 1994; Stapulionis and Deutscher, 1995). The role of the high molecular weight ArgRS has been confirmed by this work. However, based on these studies, there may be more overlap between the two Arg-tRNA pools than was originally envisioned. Thus, we find that cells can grow, albeit slowly, in the absence of high molecular weight ArgRS, implying that Arg-tRNA generated by the low molecular weight ArgRS is able to be used for translation, but much less efficiently (see Figure 6 This study does not deal explicitly with the function of the low molecular weight form of ArgRS. However, since cells lacking this enzyme grow normally, either the function(s) carried out by free ArgRS are not essential for normal growth or Arg-tRNA generated by the high molecular weight enzyme can be used instead. Studies are now in progress to examine these various possibilities. Over the years, a number of possible functions have been proposed for the multisynthetase complex (Han et al., 2003; Lee et al., 2004). These include: 1) channeling of aminoacyl-tRNAs for protein biosynthesis; 2) acting as a molecular reservoir to regulate the non-translational activities of aaRSs; 3) serving as a means to stabilize translation components; and 4) facilitating transport of tRNAs from the nucleus to the cytoplasm since the complex has also been found in the nucleus (Nathanson and Deutscher, 2000). The studies presented here provide strong support for the first role listed. Clearly, additional work will be necessary to determine whether the multisynthetase complex serves the other proposed functions as well, and to understand how it enhances the efficiency of translation, as reported here. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES Materials 3H-labeled arginine, leucine, lysine, tyrosine, valine, and 14C-labeled arginine, leucine, lysine, and tyrosine were purchased from Amersham Biosciences. Unlabeled amino acids, phosphocreatine, creatine phosphokinase, ATP, GTP, saponin, DTT, and trypan blue were obtained from Sigma. Halt Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (EDTA-Free) was purchased from Pierce. Complete Mini EDTA-free Protease Inhibitor Cocktail Tablets were from Roche. Cell culture reagents were from Gibco. Chinese hamster ovary cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). The CHO mutant strain, Arg-1, containing a temperature sensitive ArgRS (Thompson et al., 1977; Thompson et al., 1978), was generously provided by Dr. L.H. Thompson (Livermore, California). The Arg-1 parental strain (Gat-), having a triple auxotrophic requirement for glycine, adenosine, and thymidine due to a defect in folate metabolism, was also provided by Dr. L.H. Thompson. Rabbit liver tRNA was prepared as described previously (Negrutskii et al., 1994). Cell Culture For experiments using normal growth medium (containing arginine), CHO cells were grown as monolayers in Ham’s F-12 medium (Gibco) containing 2 mM L-glutamine supplemented with 5% (v/v) fetal bovine serum, 100 units/ml penicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin (HyClone). For experiments in arginine-free medium, CHO cells were maintained as monolayers in customized arginine-free F-12 medium formulated in the lab and supplemented with dialyzed 5% (v/v) fetal bovine serum. Preparation of arginine-free F-12 medium was according to Gibco’s recipe by adding all components except arginine. The pH of the customized nutrient mixture was adjusted to pH 7.2-7.4 and filtered through a 0.1 μm Acrodisc syringe filter membrane (Pall). Cells were cultured in Nunc flasks at 34°C or 40°C in air containing 5% CO2 and were transferred every 2-3 days. Cells were harvested at 80-90% of confluence by washing with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), followed by treatment with 2 ml pre-warmed trypsin containing EDTA (Invitrogen). Approximate cell numbers were determined in a hemacytometer, and their intactness was determined by trypan blue exclusion. Growth Measurements Exponentially-growing cells were harvested, resuspended in the appropriate medium and seeded into either 24-well plates (1 ml each at a cell density of 10,000 cells per well) or 6 well plates (2 ml each at a cell density of 40,000 cells per well). Cells were trypsinized and counted daily in a hemacytometer following staining with trypan blue. The generation of dead cells could also be readily monitored. In experiments with medium containing no arginine or reduced levels of arginine, the customized arginine-free F-12 medium was used, and the appropriate amount of arginine from a sterile arginine stock solution was added just prior to the experiment. Dialyzed fetal bovine serum (filter sterilized) was also used in these experiments. In all other cases, normal fetal bovine serum was used. Preparation of S10 and S100 Supernatant Fractions After harvesting and washing in PBS, the cell pellet was quickly frozen in an ethanol-dry ice bath and thawed in Buffer A (20 mM HEPES-KOH buffer, pH 7.4, containing 0.5 mM spermine, 130 mM KCl, 1% thiodiglycol, 0.5 mM EDTA, 2 mM CaCl2, and protease inhibitors (Roche; 1 tablet per 10 ml)). The cell suspension was incubated on ice for 15 min with occasional stirring. The S10 and S100 fractions were prepared by centrifuging at 10,000xg for 10 min or at 100,000xg for 2.5 h, respectively. The supernatant fraction was collected in each case, aliquoted, quick-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C. The total protein concentration was determined using the Bradford assay (Bradford, 1976). Gel Filtration Chromatography S10 or S100 supernatant fractions (1-1.5 mg total protein) were loaded into a column (0.7 × 50 cm) of Sephacryl S-300 equilibrated with 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 10% glycerol (v/v), 0.2 mM dithiothreitol, 0.2 mM EDTA, and 100 mM NaCl and eluted at a flow rate of 2.5 ml/h. Fractions of 350 μl were collected. Portions (60 μl) were assayed for aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase activity. Aminoacylation Assays Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase activity was determined at either 34°C or 40°C in reaction mixtures containing: 250 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 10 mM ATP, 10 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM EDTA, 0.2 mg/ml bovine serum albumin (BSA), 1.5 mg/ml rabbit liver tRNA, and 0.1 mM 3H-labeled amino acid (20-100 cpm/pmol). Each reaction was initiated by addition of cell lysate to the complete reaction mixture. A 100 μl portion was removed for the zero time point and the remaining mixture was placed in a 34°C or 40°C water bath. Additional 100 μl portions were removed at the indicated time points. Reactions were terminated on ice by the addition of ice-cold 10% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) containing 0.5% Casamino acids. Aminoacyl-tRNA precipitates were collected onto Glass Microfibre 696 (2.4 cm) filters (VWR) presoaked with 10% TCA containing 0.5% Casamino acids. The filters were washed nine times with 2.5% cold TCA and twice with ethanol:ether (1:1). After drying the filters, radioactivity was determined in a scintillation counter. The zero time point was used for background subtraction. Construction of Plasmids cDNA encoding the full-length, wild-type ArgRS sequence was generated from total RNA (isolated from exponentially growing CHO wt cells) via RT-PCR using primers complementary to the ArgRS cDNA sequence from CHO wt cells, and ligated into the EcoRI site of a pCMV-Script vector. For construction of a plasmid expressing only the high molecular weight form of ArgRS (Mut2), the second AUG codon (corresponding to Met74) was changed via site-directed mutagenesis into an AUU codon. For construction of a plasmid expressing only the low molecular weight form of ArgRS (Mut1), the first AUG codon (corresponding to Met1) was mutated into an AUC codon. The final constructs were verified by DNA sequencing. DNA Transfection CHO mutant Arg-1 cells were grown at 34°C in F-12 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 100 units/ml penicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin. Arg-1 cells were stably transfected using FuGENE 6 (Roche) transfection reagent according to the manufacturer’s protocol with different pCMV-Script multicopy plasmid constructs: one encoding only the high molecular weight form of ArgRS (Mut2), one encoding only the low molecular weight form of ArgRS (Mut1), and one encoding both forms of ArgRS (WT). Antibiotic G418 (at a final concentration of 0.4 μg/μl) was used to select and maintain the stable Arg-1 cell lines. Stable clones were isolated from these lines using limited dilution and seeding with 0.5 cells/well. Permeabilization of Cells One day after reaching confluency, cells (grown at 40°C) were washed once with 25 ml of Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and harvested from the flasks by incubation with 2 ml of TrypLE Express (Gibco) for 10 min at room temperature. The released cells were washed with ice-cold permeabilization Buffer S (130 mM sucrose, 50 mM potassium acetate, 50 mM KCl, 20 mM HEPES pH 7.4), pelleted by centrifugation, and resuspended in ice-cold Buffer S using ~ 60 μl of buffer per 107 cells. The total volume of cell suspension was measured by pipetting, and an equal volume of saponin solution (150 μg/ml) in Buffer S was added to give ~1.2 μg of saponin per 106 cells. The suspension was mixed and incubated at 37°C for 6 min, cooled on ice and centrifuged for 1 min at 400-500xg. The permeabilized cells were washed once with ice-cold PSW buffer (130 mM sucrose, 50 mM potassium acetate, 50 mM KCl, 20 mM HEPES pH 7.4, 5 mM ATP, 13 mM phosphocreatine, 6.1 mM MgCl2, 2.6 mM CaCl2, 5.3 mM EGTA, 5 mM glucose), suspended in 4-5 volumes of PSW buffer and immediately used for assays. A small portion was used to measure cell permeability by trypan blue exclusion and for cell counting. Protein Synthesis in Permeabilized Cells Protein synthesis experiments using permeabilized cells were carried out in PSW buffer supplemented with the following components: 0.1 mM GTP, 250 μM each of 20 amino acids, [3H]-labeled arginine, tyrosine, leucine, lysine, and 30 μg/ml creatine phosphokinase. Permeabilized cells were incubated at 28°C (at this temperature they are capable of carrying out high rates of protein synthesis), and at various times, duplicate portions of 100 μl were taken, precipitated with ice-cold 2.5% TCA and 0.5% Casamino acids, and cooled on ice. One portion was boiled for 10 min at 95°C to destroy labeled aminoacyl-tRNA and then cooled on ice. Precipitates were collected on microfibre filters. Hot TCA-insoluble radioactivity was considered to represent protein synthesis, whereas that from the non-boiled samples represents both protein synthesis and aminoacyl-tRNA. Isolation of Charged tRNA and Periodate Oxidation The extent of aminoacylation in vivo was measured by the periodate oxidation method (Rizzino, et al., 1974; Andrulis, et al., 1979). tRNA was isolated under acidic conditions by resuspending the cell pellet in buffer containing 0.3 M sodium acetate (pH 5.0), 10 mM Na2EDTA, and 0.15 M NaCl. Cells were lysed using TRI-Reagent (Sigma), chloroform was added and the mixture was vortexed for 15 sec, followed by incubation at room temperature for 15 min. After centrifugation at 10,000xg at 4°C for 15 min, the aqueous phase was collected, mixed with 2.5 vol of ice-cold 95% ethanol and placed at - 20°C. The precipitate was collected by centrifugation at 10,000xg at 4°C. Each pellet was resuspended in 0.1 M sodium acetate, pH 5.0, followed by two isopropanol precipitations to remove high molecular weight RNA species. The isolated tRNA was then dissolved in 0.1 M sodium acetate, pH 5.0, and divided into two equal portions. To one portion was added 40 mM sodium periodate (J.T.Baker) to a final concentration of 3 mM, while the control received 0.1 vol of distilled water. The tubes were incubated in the dark at 37°C for 30 min. After incubation, periodate was destroyed by addition of excess glucose and samples were incubated in the dark for 5 min at 37°C. Samples were mixed with 2.5 vol of ice-cold 95% ethanol and precipitated for 90 min at -20°C. Precipitates were collected by centrifugation at 10,000xg at 4°C for 10 min. tRNA was collected and deacylated in 0.1 M Tris-HCl, pH 9.0, by incubation at 37°C for 1 h. Samples were mixed with 2.5 vol of ice-cold 95% ethanol and precipitated at -20°C. tRNA was resuspended in 0.1 M sodium acetate, pH 5.0. The percentage of tRNA that originally existed in a charged form in vivo was then measured using an aminoacylation assay at 37°C, as described above. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank David Fisher and Dr. Alice Hudder for construction of plasmids and for their efforts in the initial stages of this project, Dr. Oleksii Dubrovskyi for helpful discussion, and Dr. Larry H. Thompson for CHO cell strains. This work was supported by Grant GM16317 and by funds provided by the Lucille P. Markey Foundation. Footnotes Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. REFERENCES
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003 Apr 18; 303(4):985-93.
[Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003]J Cell Sci. 2004 Aug 1; 117(Pt 17):3725-34.
[J Cell Sci. 2004]Eur J Biochem. 1985 Mar 1; 147(2):281-9.
[Eur J Biochem. 1985]Biochim Biophys Acta. 1994 Apr 21; 1199(3):293-7.
[Biochim Biophys Acta. 1994]Biochem Mol Biol Int. 1994 Apr; 32(6):1075-83.
[Biochem Mol Biol Int. 1994]J Biol Chem. 1982 Jun 10; 257(11):6003-6.
[J Biol Chem. 1982]J Biol Chem. 1985 Aug 15; 260(17):9843-7.
[J Biol Chem. 1985]Biochim Biophys Acta. 1985 Jun 10; 829(2):173-9.
[Biochim Biophys Acta. 1985]J Mol Biol. 2000 Sep 29; 302(4):991-1004.
[J Mol Biol. 2000]Gene. 1993 Oct 15; 132(2):237-45.
[Gene. 1993]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 May; 87(10):3665-9.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990]Nature. 1987 Apr 23-29; 326(6115):808-11.
[Nature. 1987]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Jun 1; 88(11):4991-5.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Apr 15; 89(8):3601-4.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Feb 1; 91(3):964-8.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994]Cell. 1977 May; 11(1):157-68.
[Cell. 1977]Somatic Cell Genet. 1978 Jul; 4(4):423-35.
[Somatic Cell Genet. 1978]J Mol Biol. 2000 Sep 29; 302(4):991-1004.
[J Mol Biol. 2000]Gene. 1993 Oct 15; 132(2):237-45.
[Gene. 1993]Gene. 1995 Oct 27; 164(2):347-50.
[Gene. 1995]J Biol Chem. 1982 Jun 10; 257(11):6003-6.
[J Biol Chem. 1982]Eur J Biochem. 1985 Mar 1; 147(2):281-9.
[Eur J Biochem. 1985]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 May; 87(10):3665-9.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990]J Biol Chem. 2000 Oct 13; 275(41):31559-62.
[J Biol Chem. 2000]J Bacteriol. 1974 Feb; 117(2):449-55.
[J Bacteriol. 1974]J Biol Chem. 1979 Nov 10; 254(21):10629-33.
[J Biol Chem. 1979]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Jun 1; 88(11):4991-5.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Apr 15; 89(8):3601-4.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Feb 1; 91(3):964-8.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Aug 1; 92(16):7158-61.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Jun 1; 88(11):4991-5.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Apr 15; 89(8):3601-4.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Feb 1; 91(3):964-8.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Aug 1; 92(16):7158-61.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 May; 87(10):3665-9.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Jun 1; 88(11):4991-5.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Apr 15; 89(8):3601-4.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Feb 1; 91(3):964-8.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Aug 1; 92(16):7158-61.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995]Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003 Apr 18; 303(4):985-93.
[Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003]J Cell Sci. 2004 Aug 1; 117(Pt 17):3725-34.
[J Cell Sci. 2004]J Biol Chem. 2000 Oct 13; 275(41):31559-62.
[J Biol Chem. 2000]Cell. 1977 May; 11(1):157-68.
[Cell. 1977]Somatic Cell Genet. 1978 Jul; 4(4):423-35.
[Somatic Cell Genet. 1978]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Feb 1; 91(3):964-8.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994]Anal Biochem. 1976 May 7; 72():248-54.
[Anal Biochem. 1976]J Bacteriol. 1974 Feb; 117(2):449-55.
[J Bacteriol. 1974]J Biol Chem. 1979 Nov 10; 254(21):10629-33.
[J Biol Chem. 1979]