• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Plant J. Mar 2008; 53(5): 731–738.
PMCID: PMC2268993

MicroRNA399 is a long-distance signal for the regulation of plant phosphate homeostasis

Abstract

The presence of microRNA species in plant phloem sap suggests potential signaling roles by long-distance regulation of gene expression. Proof for such a role for a phloem-mobile microRNA is lacking. Here we show that phosphate (Pi) starvation-induced microRNA399 (miR399) is present in the phloem sap of two diverse plant species, rapeseed and pumpkin, and levels are strongly and specifically increased in phloem sap during Pi deprivation. By performing micro-grafting experiments using Arabidopsis, we further show that chimeric plants constitutively over-expressing miR399 in the shoot accumulate mature miR399 species to very high levels in their wild-type roots, while corresponding primary transcripts are virtually absent in roots, demonstrating shoot-to-root transport. The chimeric plants exhibit (i) down-regulation of the miR399 target transcript (PHO2), which encodes a critical component for maintenance of Pi homeostasis, in the wild-type root, and (ii) Pi accumulation in the shoot, which is the phenotype of pho2 mutants, miR399 over-expressers or chimeric plants with a genetic knock-out of PHO2 in the root. Hence the transported miR399 molecules retain biological activity. This is a demonstration of systemic control of a biological process, i.e. maintenance of plant Pi homeostasis, by a phloem-mobile microRNA.

Keywords: microRNA, phosphate homeostasis, long-distance signaling, nutrient, Arabidopsis, Brassica

Introduction

Inorganic phosphate (Pi) is one of the most limiting mineral nutrients for plant growth (Bieleski, 1973; Poirier and Bucher, 2002; Marschner, 1995). The levels in the soil are often low, much of the Pi is covalently or non-covalently bound, and mobility is restricted. Strategies of plants to cope with and to improve Pi acquisition during Pi limitation include increasing the root/shoot ratio (Lynch, 1995), alterations in root architecture (López-Bucio et al., 2002; Williamson et al., 2001), production of lateral roots into Pi-rich patches in the soil (Robinson, 1994), proliferation of long root hairs (Bates and Lynch, 2001), increasing high-affinity Pi uptake capacities (Mudge et al., 2002; Smith et al., 2003), establishing symbiotic interactions with mycorrhizal fungi (Harrison, 1999), production and root secretion of organic acids to solubilize Pi in the soil and apoplast (Raghothama, 1999), and induction of phosphatases (del Pozo et al., 1999; Li et al., 2002) and RNases (Bariola et al., 1994) that mobilize organically bound phosphate inside and outside the plant. Changes in metabolism allow re-mobilization of Pi in the plant, including a general decrease in the levels of P-containing intermediates and co-factors such as nucleotides (Zrenner et al., 2006), or replacement of phospholipids by sulfo- and galactolipids (Dörmann and Benning, 2002; Härtel et al., 2000).

Correct allocation of the available Pi in the plant, i.e. maintenance of Pi homeostasis by supplying growing organs and tissues such as young leaves and inflorescences with the spare resources taken up by roots, is also important for plant productivity and survival during Pi limitation. The existence of mutants with altered levels and distribution of Pi (pho1, pho2 and pup1; see Delhaize and Randall, 1995; Poirier et al., 1991; Trull and Deikman, 1998) suggests that plants regulate the long-distance transport and allocation of Pi between shoot and root. PHO1 encodes the founder member of a novel transporter family (Hamburger et al., 2002) and probably is involved in Pi transport into the xylem (Wang et al., 2004), and PHO2 encodes an E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme (Aung et al., 2006; Bari et al., 2006). The PHO2 E2 conjugase is a major component for the maintenance of Pi homeostasis in Arabidopsis. pho2 mutants grown in Pi-replete conditions display continuous induction of a subset of phosphate starvation-induced (PSI) genes, including some encoding phosphate transporters (Aung et al., 2006; Bari et al., 2006), and accumulate Pi to high levels (three- to fivefold increased) in shoots but not roots (Bari et al., 2006; Delhaize and Randall, 1995).

PHO2 expression is post-transcriptionally regulated by microRNA399 (miR399). miR399 acts through transcript cleavage (Allen et al., 2005) and probably also translational repression (Bari et al., 2006). Consistently, over-expression of miR399 leads to high shoot Pi levels, thus phenocopying pho2 mutants (Aung et al., 2006; Bari et al., 2006; Fujii et al., 2005). The PHO2 gene harbors five binding sites complementary to miR399 in its 5′ UTR approximately 200–400 nucleotides upstream of the start codon, and miR399-dependent PHO2 transcript cleavage at these sites has been experimentally verified (Allen et al., 2005). Six miR399 species (a–f) that arise from five primary transcripts (PTs) have been identified in Arabidopsis (http://microrna.sanger.ac.uk). miR399d is by far the most prominent one during Pi limitation, based on the abundance of its primary transcript (Bari et al., 2006). The levels of mature miR399 and the five miR399 PTs are highly and specifically increased during Pi limitation (Bari et al., 2006; Fujii et al., 2005), suggesting inhibition of PHO2 under these conditions. Consistently, removal of the miR399 binding sites results in high and stable PHO2 transcript levels in Pi-limited plants (Fujii et al., 2005). Micrografting experiments revealed that a pho2 mutant root genotype is sufficient to result in shoot Pi accumulation (Bari et al., 2006). On the other hand, MIR399 genes, and especially MIR399d, display particularly strong induction in shoots (as compared to roots) during Pi limitation, with the shoot miR399d PT level exceeding the root PHO2 transcript level (Bari et al., 2006). This led us to hypothesize that miR399 itself might act as a long-distance Pi starvation signal in Arabidopsis.

Long-distance signaling in plants is known to be important for the regulation of several processes including leaf development, flowering, pathogen defense and resource allocation (Jaeger and Wigge, 2007; Khamis et al., 1990; Palauqui et al., 1997; Voinnet et al., 1998; for review, see Lough and Lucas, 2006). The phloem translocation stream of higher plants contains a multitude of small molecules and macromolecules, including proteins, mRNA and small RNAs (Lough and Lucas, 2006; Ruiz-Medrano et al., 2001). Several microRNAs have also been detected in the phloem sap of pumpkin (Yoo et al., 2004) and oilseed rape (Buhtz et al.). However, unlike siRNA or mRNA species (Haywood et al., 2005; Ruiz-Medrano et al., 1999; Voinnet et al., 1998; Yoo et al., 2004), microRNAs have not been functionally implicated in plant long-distance signaling. Here we present data that identify miR399 as a phloem-mobile long-distance signal for regulation of Pi homeostasis in Arabidopsis.

Results and discussion

Presence and Pi-specific induction of miR399 in phloem sap

To demonstrate the presence of miR399 and its Pi-status-dependent changes in phloem sap, we grew rapeseed (Brassica napus) and pumpkin (Cucurbita maxima) plants under abundant and limiting Pi conditions, and collected phloem sap for the determination of microRNA levels. Doing this type of experiment with Arabidopsis is impracticable because of (i) major difficulties associated with the collection of sufficiently large quantities of phloem sap from this small plant species, (ii) problems with RNase contamination and/or wounding-inducible RNase activity (Köck et al., 2004; LeBrasseur et al., 2002) in phloem sap exudates collected by decapitation or incision methods, making isolation and quantification of RNA impossible (A.B. and J.K., unpublished observations), and (iii) contamination of the sap with content (e.g. RNA) from other cells. Rapeseed plants are a useful alternative to Arabidopsis due to the close genetic relatedness of the two species, as well as their similar phloem sap composition, as judged by their protein profiles (J.K., unpublished data). In addition, phloem sap exudation from incised rapeseed inflorescence stems is quite strong, thus enabling rapid sampling and minimization of problems involving contaminating/induced RNase activity.

Mature miR399 was detected by quantitative real-time PCR and RNA gel blotting in rapeseed and pumpkin phloem sap (Figure 1), but miR399 precursors or primary transcripts were not detectable (results not shown). Mature miR399 levels increased very strongly in the phloem sap of Pi-limited plants (a difference of 7–10 quantitative real-time PCR CT value units, equivalent to a >100-fold change) (Figure 1a–c,e). The increase was even stronger and the abundance higher in phloem sap than in leaves, for example (Figure 1c), suggesting efficient transport of miR399 into the sap and/or strong induction of miR399 expression in phloem companion cells. The increase/accumulation of miR399 in phloem sap or other plant organs such as roots was also specific, as levels for other microRNA species, i.e. miR164 (Figure 1d) and miR172 (Figure 1f), did not change during Pi limitation. These results demonstrate that miR399 is present and highly abundant in the phloem, and indicate that the increase during Pi limitation is not related to decreased phloem mass flow. They also underscore the conserved Pi-responsiveness of miR399 in distantly related plant species (Bari et al., 2006; Chiou et al., 2006).

Figure 1
Mature miR399 levels in phloem sap change with phosphate status. (a) Levels of mature miR399 in phloem saps of Brassica napus and Curcurbita maxima grown under full nutrient (FN, black bars) and Pi-limited (white bars) conditions. Data (mean ± ...

We further investigated the Pi specificity of this response by investigating miR399 levels in phloem sap of plants starved of sulfate. RNA gel blotting showed that mature miR399 abundance was unaffected by sulfate deprivation in phloem sap (Figure 1g) and leaves and roots (results not shown) of rapeseed plants. This is in accordance with previous results showing that miR399 primary transcripts are unaffected by limitation of sulfate, nitrogen or carbohydrates (Bari et al., 2006). It was also demonstrated that mature miR399 is unaffected by nitrogen (Bari et al., 2006) or potassium limitation (Fujii et al., 2005). Taken together, these results show that the responsiveness of miR399 and its primary transcripts is Pi-specific in all plant organs/samples, including phloem sap.

Micrografting reveals shoot-to-root transport and biological activity of shoot-derived miR399 in roots

We next investigated whether miR399 produced in the shoot can be detected and consequently alter expression of its target gene (PHO2) in the root. For this purpose, we used micro-grafting (Turnbull et al., 2002) to generate chimeric Arabidopsis plants that over-express miR399 in either shoots or roots. Six miR399 species (a–f) that arise from five primary transcripts have been identified in Arabidopsis. miR399d is the most prominent one during Pi limitation, based on the abundance of its primary transcript (Bari et al., 2006) (Figures 2 and and3).3). Transgenic plants strongly over-expressing miR399d (OX) under control of the 35S promoter were previously shown to have approximately 10-fold lower levels of the target PHO2 transcript (Bari et al., 2006), and to accumulate Pi in leaves to levels as high as in pho2 mutants or in micro-grafted chimeric plants with a pho2 root and a wild-type (WT) shoot scion (Bari et al., 2006).

Figure 2
Quantitative real-time PCR expression levels of miR399 and PHO2 in shoots. Levels of (a–e) the five miR399 primary transcripts (PT), (f) mature miR399, and (g, h) PHO2 in shoots of WT (black bars), miR399 OX (white bars), and micrografted chimeric ...
Figure 3
Quantitative real-time PCR expression levels of miR399 and PHO2 in roots. Levels of (a–e) the five miR399 primary transcripts (PT), (f) mature miR399, and (g,h) PHO2 in shoots of WT (black bars), miR399 OX (white bars), and micrografted chimeric ...

As expected, the primary transcripts of miR399d (miR399d PT) and mature miR399 were strongly increased (threshold fluorescence was reached 12–13 cycles earlier during quantitative real-time PCR, equivalent to a >1000-fold increase) in root and shoot material from OX plants compared to the same material from WT plants (Figures 2 and and33 and Table S1). The levels of miR399d PT and mature miR399 in OX shoots matched the high levels found in Pi-starved WT shoots (Figure 2d,f), but the levels of the other miR399 primary transcripts (a, b, c, e/f) remained at barely detectable or undetectable levels, as in Pi-replete WT (see Table S1; note that in Figures 2 and and33 values for 40-deltaCT of less than approximately 30 correspond to transcript copy numbers of far less than 1 per cell in our quantitative real-time PCR system (Czechowski et al., 2004; also see Experimental Procedures)). In Figures 2 and and3,3, values for 40 −ΔCT of less than approximately 30 correspond to transcript copy numbers of much less than 1 per cell in our quantitative real-time PCR system (see Experimental procedures). The level of PHO2 transcript, measured using two quantitative real-time PCR primer pairs amplifying near the 3′ and 5′ ends of the PHO2 coding sequence (CDS), was approximately 10-fold decreased in OX plants (equivalent to 3 or 4 quantitative real-time PCR cycles) (Figure 2g,h and Table S1), and the leaf Pi level was four- to fivefold increased (Figure 4) as previously reported (Bari et al., 2006).

Figure 4
Leaf phosphate levels in chimeric plants. Phosphate levels in leaves of 5-week-old, hydroponically grown WT (black bars), miR399 OX (white bars), pho2 mutant (gray bars) and reciprocally grafted chimeras (hatched bars). Shoot (S) and root (R) genotypes ...

When shoot material from chimeras with an OX shoot and WT root (OX/WT) was investigated, it showed the same behavior as OX shoots of non-chimeric plants with respect to the levels of miR399 PTs, mature miR399 and PHO2 transcript (Figure 2). The root material of the same OX/WT chimeras exhibited WT-like miR399 PT levels (Figure 3a–e and Table S1), which were all below the expression level of some of the rarest transcription factor transcripts known (e.g. WUSCHEL, At2g17950), equivalent to an abundance of approximately 1 copy per 100 cells or less for each miR399 PT (see Czechowski et al., 2004). In contrast, the same WT roots had very high, OX-like, mature miR399 levels (Figure 3f), equivalent to a copy number of > 500 per cell, which is similar to that of one of the most abundant plant transcripts, UBQ10 (see Czechowski et al., 2005) and OX-like low PHO2 transcript level (Figure 3g,h). The shoot material had high Pi levels in the leaves, similar to those of genotypes in which PHO2 is inhibited in roots (Figure 4). We have previously shown by micro-grafting of pho2 and WT that decreased PHO2 in the shoot alone does not lead to increased Pi in the shoot (Bari et al., 2006).

A theoretical explanation for the virtually absent miR399 PTs and the simultaneous massive accumulation of mature miR399 in roots of OX/WT chimeras could be highly efficient cleavage of miR399 PTs into shorter fragments that escape oligo(dT)-primed reverse transcription and subsequent quantitative real-time PCR detection. Although there is no indication of highly efficient cleavage in roots of OX plants or WT/OX chimeras (i.e. the level of miR399 PTs mirrors the mature miR399 level), we analyzed whether there is an increase of corresponding fragments by reverse-transcribing total RNA with a primer binding to the 3′ region of the miR399d precursor sequence (Figure 5) (see Experimental procedures). However, there was no evidence for accumulation of such fragments in the roots of the OX/WT chimeras, as the level was as low as in Pi-replete WT. Similarly, the miR399 complementary duplex strand (miR399*) could not be detected in roots of OX/WT chimeras or roots of Pi-replete WT, but was clearly present in Pi-limited WT roots and miR399d PT over-expresser roots (results not shown). These results further suggest that the MIR399 genes are truly inactive in the roots of the OX/WT chimeras. The explanation for the massive accumulation of mature miR399 found in roots of OX/WT chimeras therefore must be transport of miR399 molecules from the OX scion to the WT root, where they exert their biological function, i.e. suppress PHO2. Co-localization of miR399 and the PHO2 target transcript in the root vascular cylinder has been reported previously (Aung et al., 2006), and further supports their interaction in vivo. The inactivity of the MIR399 genes in the roots of OX/WT chimeras also excludes the possibility that another phloem-mobile molecular species (e.g. a hormone or metabolite) acts as an intermediate signal to trigger miR399 synthesis.

Figure 5
Absence of miR399d precursor fragments in roots of OX/WT chimeras. (a) Depiction of miR399d primary transcript structure. miR399 is shown in black, the miR399 precursor in gray, and the residual parts of the known transcript in white. The hatched part ...

A situation similar to that in the OX/WT chimera was also observed in Pi-deprived WT plants. During Pi starvation, levels of the miR399 PT rise in WT roots, but only to levels that are approximately 1% of the level of mature miR399 (Figure 3 and Figure S1a), while miR399 PT levels in WT shoots equal or exceed the mature miR399 level (Figure 2 and Figure S1a). This result indicates that miR399 phloem transport is relevant in the normal biological situation. In addition, given the relatively long half-life time of mature miR399 (approximately 12 h, Figure S1b) (Bari et al., 2006), we estimated that phloem transport rates are sufficiently high to achieve and maintain very high (i.e. PHO-inhibitory) levels of mature miR399 in roots that do not express miR399 PTs within a physiological response time of 2–3 h (see Appendix S1). In summary, Pi deprivation in the shoot can be rapidly signaled to the roots through miR399. Subsequent inhibition of PHO2 by miR399 in the root will lead to increased Pi uptake and transport to the shoot (Aung et al., 2006; Bari et al., 2006; Delhaize and Randall, 1995). This elegant mechanism is capable of maintaining shoot Pi homeostasis and optimizing shoot growth during Pi limitation.

No evidence for root-to-shoot transport of miR399

Reciprocal chimeras (WT/OX) that over-express miR399d PT and mature miR399 in roots were also investigated. The root material (Figure 3) resembled that of normal OX plants, while the shoot material (Figure 2) resembled WT material, with low miR399d PT and low mature miR399. This indicates that root-to-shoot transport of miR399, which would occur via the xylem, does not take place or occurs to a negligible extent. Unlike water or ions, the transport of larger molecules, including miR399, is not circulatory between shoot and root (Lough and Lucas, 2006). Accordingly, miR399 was not detectable in xylem sap from oilseed rape plants grown under normal or phosphate-deficient conditions (Buhtz et al., in press). The level of PHO2 transcript in the shoots of WT/OX chimeras was high, resembling Pi-replete WT shoots (Figure 2g,h). Leaf Pi levels were also high (Figure 4), resembling genotypes in which the level of PHO2 transcript is low in roots (Bari et al., 2006).

Taken together, these results pinpoint the mature miR399 as a phloem-mobile molecule that increases in concentration in phloem sap during Pi limitation, and that can be transported between plant organs and exert its biological role at its destination. Hence, miR399 fulfills the criteria for a long-distance signaling molecule. The existence of multiple microRNA species in phloem sap of diverse plant species (Buhtz et al., in press; Yoo et al., 2004) indicates that this might only be one example of systemic control of a biological process by a microRNA.

Despite the demonstration that miR399 is transported in the phloem conduit, and thereby plays a central role in the maintenance of whole-plant Pi homeostasis, several questions remain to be addressed with respect to the transport mechanism. These include the mechanism and proteins required for miR399 entry into and exit from the sieve tubes, and the requirement and nature of RNA binding proteins to allow miR399 phloem transport, such as the 27 kDa phloem small RNA binding protein CmPSRP1 (Yoo et al., 2004) or the 16 kDa phloem protein 16 (CmPP16) (Xoconostle-Cázares et al., 1999) in Cucurbita maxima. With respect to translocation in the phloem, the current data indicate that miR399, as already suggested for the whole miRNA population (Yoo et al., 2004), travels as a single-stranded molecule, as, in contrast to the miR399 sense strand, the level of the miR399* strand does not show any increase under phosphate starvation (Buhtz et al., in press). miR399 is efficiently translocated from Pi-replete OX shoots to Pi-replete WT roots. This suggests that the components of miR399 phloem uptake, translocation and exit are either constitutively present or induced during Pi limitation in a miR399-dependent manner.

Long-distance signaling in biological systems was put in place when multi-cellular organisms evolved. In this regard, it is interesting to note that miR399 and its target PHO2 gene are found in higher multi-cellular plants only, including rice, poplar and Medicago, but not in single-celled algae (Bari et al., 2006). The Pi-dependence of miR399 expression is strongly conserved between dicots and monocots, as is the target gene with respect to gene structure, encoded protein sequence, and the number and positions of miR399 binding sites in its 5′ UTR (Bari et al., 2006). This suggests co-evolution and conservation of the molecular components required for Pi homeostasis in higher multi-cellular plants. Long-distance transport of miR399 further cements this view.

Experimental procedures

Growth of rapeseed and pumpkin, and phloem sap sampling

Rapeseed (Brassica napus cv. Drakkar) and pumpkin (Cucurbita maxima) plants were grown in 18 cm pots containing a low-Pi soil mix in a phytotron at 25°C (day)/20°C (night), with a 16 h light period at an intensity of 550 μE. Plants were divided into two sets; one set was supplied with a full nutrient solution containing sufficient (3 mm) Pi, and the other one was supplied with the same nutrient solution free of Pi. Rapeseed plants were grown until flowering (7–8 weeks) and phloem sap was then collected by incising inflorescence stems (Giavalisco et al., 2006). Phloem sap from pumpkin plants was collected by stem incision 3 weeks after germination. After discarding the first droplets, the exuded phloem sap was collected into four volumes of ice-cold Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, http://www.invitrogen.com/).

Hydroponically grown rapeseed plants were germinated on filter paper for 1 week before transferring them to a hydroponics system containing nutrient medium (Buhtz et al., in press) for 7–8 weeks. Nutrient solutions were changed after 3 weeks, and subsequently renewed once a week. Phosphate and sulfur starvation were initiated after 3 weeks by changing to medium containing no phosphate or sulfur, respectively, and phloem sap was collected from inflorescence stems as described above.

Micrografting of Arabidopsis seedlings

Micrografting of 6-day-old seedlings grown on sterile vertical agar plates was performed as described previously (Turnbull et al., 2002). Seeds of the miR399d over-expressers, wild-type (ecotype Col-0) and pho2 mutant were surface-sterilized, and stratified at 4°C for 3 days. The seed were then laid onto sterile half-strength MS agar (0.7%) plates. The plates were kept vertically in constant light (approximately 120 μE) at 20°C for 3 days in an Arabidopsis growth chamber (Percival Scientific Inc., http://www.percival-scientific.com/), and then kept at 28°C under an 8 h photoperiod (60 μE) for another 3 days. The seedlings were grafted using silicon tubing (0.3 mm internal diameter) as the collar, and grafted seedlings were kept on identical sterile agar plates and under the same growth conditions for another 6–8 days until the graft junction had healed. Successfully grafted plantlets (approximately 14 days old) were transferred to a hydroponic culture system with half-strength nutrient solution containing 1.5 mm or no Pi (Scheible et al., 2004), and grown for another 3 weeks before harvesting of leaf and root material into liquid nitrogen. This material was used for analysis of gene expression and Pi content. Special care was taken to avoid any plants with adventitious roots.

Pi measurements

Pi levels were measured using a colorimetric micromethod (Itaya and Ui, 1966). Discs were taken from leaves of the same age using a 6 mm cork borer, and individually ground in 50 μl distilled water using plastic rods (Sarstedt, http://www.sarstedt.com) in 96-well plates (Greiner Bio-One, http://www.greinerbioone.com). Extracts were diluted with water to 125 μl, and then the microtiter plate was centrifuged at 3000 gfor 4 min. Aliquots (10 μl) of the supernatant were mixed with 15 μl water, and 100 μl 1 m HCl and 100 μl color reagent (one volume of 4.2% (NH4)6Mo7O24·H2O in 5 N HCl, three volumes of 0.2% malachite green dye in water) were added. The plate was incubated at room temperature for 15 min before adding 100 μl 1.5% Tween-20. The absorbance at 660 nm was measured another 15 min later. The Pi concentration in the samples was determined against a calibration curve.

RNA isolation, cDNA preparation, and quantitative real-time PCR

RNA isolation of total RNA from Brassica napus and Curcurbita maxima was achieved using Trizol reagent, and isolation of RNA from roots and shoots of micrografted Arabidopsis plants was performed using RNeasy mini kits (Qiagen; http://www.qiagen.com). cDNA preparation and quantitative real-time PCR were performed using the primer pairs previously described (Bari et al., 2006; Czechowski et al., 2004, 2005). cDNA synthesis for the detection of miR399d precursors/primary transcript fragments was primed using 5′- GGCAAATCTCCTTTGGCAGAG-3′ (RT2 in Figure 5). Typically, approximately 5–10 ng of cDNA, the amount produced from the RNA of several thousand cells (Czechowski et al., 2004), was used per assay, yielding a CT value of 16–17 for UBQ10 (see Table S1), which is equivalent to 1–2 million single-stranded UBQ10 template copies in the PCR reaction vessel.

For quantification of mature miR399 and miR164, total RNA was reverse-transcribed using stem-loop primers (5′-GTCGTATCCAGTGCAGGGTCCGAGGTATTCGCACTGGATACGACCGGGGCAAA-3′ and 5′-GTCGTATCCAGTGCAGGGTCCGAzGGTATTCGCACTGGAT ACGACCGCACG-3′, respectively) and MultiScribe reverse transcriptase (Applied Biosystems; http://www.appliedbiosystems.com/) (Chen et al., 2005). In brief, 1 μg total RNA was mixed with 1 μl 10 mm dNTPs, 1 μl 2.5 μm miRNA-specific stem-loop RT primer and RNase-free water to a final volume of 36.5 μl, heated to 65°C for 5 min, and then chilled on ice. Then 10 μl of 5x first-strand buffer, 2 μl 0.1 m DTT, 0.5 μl RNase inhibitor and 1 μl MultiScribe reverse transcriptase were added. The reaction mixture was incubated for 30 min at 16°C, followed by 30 min at 42°C and 5 min at 85°C, and then held at 4°C until quantitative real-time PCR amplification using primers miR399fwd (5′-CGACGTGCCAAAGGAGATTTG-3′), miR164fwd (5′-CACGTGGAGAAGCAG GGCA-3′) and miRrev (5′-CCAGTGCAGGGTCCGAGGT-3′). Rather than TaqMan probes (Chen et al., 2005), SYBR® Green (Applied Biosystems; http://www.appliedbiosystems.com) was used as the fluorescence dye for real-time monitoring of DNA amplification.

Primer efficiency (E) was determined for all amplicons using the freeware program LinRegPCR (Ramakers et al., 2003). The value did not change significantly between different cDNA samples, and was always higher than 0.80.

RNA gel blot analysis of microRNA species

Northern analysis was performed as described by Bari et al. (2006). Aliquots (20 μg) of total RNA were resolved on denaturing 17% polyacrylamide gels containing 7 m urea in 0.5x Tris-Borate/EDTA. RNA was blotted to positively charged nylon membranes (Biodyne B, Pall Europe Ltd; http://www.pall.com/) using a semi-dry transfer cell (Bio-Rad; http://www.bio-rad.com/) and auto-crosslinked at 0.12 mJ in a Stratalinker 1800 (Stratagene; http://www.stratagene.com/). The membrane was hybridized at 42°C with 32P end-labeled probes (5′-TTACAGGGCAAATCTCCTTTGGCA-3′ and 5′-ATGCAGCATCATCAAGATTCT-3′) complementary to miR399 and miR172, respectively, and visualized using a phosphorimager BAS-1800 II (Fuji Photo Film Co. Ltd; http://www.fujifilm.com/).

Materials not commercially available and used in the experiments reported will be made available for non-profit research on request.

Acknowledgments

We thank Professor Mark Stitt (Max-Planck Institute for Molecular Plant Physiology) for his comments on the manuscript, and Dr Tzyy-Jen Chiou (Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan) for discussions on the results. The work was supported by the Max-Planck Society.

Supplementary material

The following supplementary material is available for this article online:

Figure S1

Expression levels of mature miR399 and miR399d primary transcripts in Arabidopsis wild-type during Pi limitation and re-addition.

Table S1

Quantitative real-time RT-PCR threshold cycle values.

Appendix S1

Estimation of the time required to establish high mature miR399 levels by shoot-to-root phloem transport in roots that do not express miR399 PTs.

This material is available as part of the online article from http://www.blackwell-synergy.com

Please note: Blackwell Publishing are not responsible for the content or functionality of any supplementary materials supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing material) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.

References

  • Allen E, Xie Z, Gustafson AM, Carrington JC. MicroRNA-directed phasing during trans-acting siRNA biogenesis in plants. Cell. 2005;121:207–221. [PubMed]
  • Aung K, Lin SI, Wu CC, Huang YT, Su CL, Chiou TJ. Pho2, a phosphate overaccumulator, is caused by a nonsense mutation in a microRNA399 target gene. Plant Physiol. 2006;141:1000–1011. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Bari R, Pant BD, Stitt M, Scheible W-R. PHO2, microRNA399, and PHR1 define a phosphate-signaling pathway in plants. Plant Physiol. 2006;141:988–999. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Bariola PA, Howard CJ, Taylor CB, Verburg MT, Jaglan VD, Green PJ. The Arabidopsis ribonuclease gene RNS1 is tightly controlled in response to phosphate limitation. Plant J. 1994;6:673–685. [PubMed]
  • Bates R, Lynch JP. Root hairs confer a competitive advantage under low phosphate availability. Plant Soil. 2001;236:243–250.
  • Bieleski RL. Phosphate pools, phosphate transport, and phosphate availability. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 1973;24:225–252.
  • Buhtz A, Springer F, Chapell L, Baulcombe D, Kehr J. Identification and characterization of small RNAs from the phloem of Brassica napus. Plant J. 2007 doi 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.003368.x. [PubMed]
  • Chen C, Ridzon DA, Broomer AJ, et al. Real-time quantification of microRNAs by stem–loop RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:e179. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Chiou TJ, Aung K, Lin SI, Wu CC, Chiang SF, Su CL. Regulation of phosphate homeostasis by microRNA in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2006;18:412–421. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Czechowski T, Bari RP, Stitt M, Scheible W-R, Udvardi MK. Real-time RT-PCR profiling of over 1400 Arabidopsis transcription factors: unprecedented sensitivity reveals novel root- and shoot-specific genes. Plant J. 2004;38:366–379. [PubMed]
  • Czechowski T, Stitt M, Altmann T, Udvardi MK, Scheible W-R. Genome-wide identification and testing of superior reference genes for transcript normalization in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2005;139:5–17. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Delhaize E, Randall PJ. Characterization of a phosphate-accumulator mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol. 1995;107:207–213. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Dörmann P, Benning C. Galactolipids rule in seed plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2002;7:112–118. [PubMed]
  • Fujii H, Chiou TJ, Lin SI, Aung K, Zhu JK. A miRNA involved in phosphate-starvation response in Arabidopsis. Curr. Biol. 2005;15:2038–2042. [PubMed]
  • Giavalisco P, Kapitza K, Kolasa A, Buhtz A, Kehr J. Towards the proteome of Brassica napus phloem sap. Proteomics. 2006;6:896–909. [PubMed]
  • Hamburger D, Rezzonico E, MacDonald-Comber Petétot J, Somerville C, Poirier Y. Identification and characterization of the Arabidopsis PHO1 gene involved in phosphate loading to the xylem. Plant Cell. 2002;14:889–902. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Harrison MJ. Molecular and cellular aspects of the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 1999;50:361–389. [PubMed]
  • Härtel H, Dörmann P, Benning C. DGD1-independent biosynthesis of extraplastidic galactolipids after phosphate deprivation in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2000;97:10649–10654. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Haywood V, Yu TS, Huang NC, Lucas WJ. Phloem long-distance trafficking of GIBBERELLIC ACID INSENSITIVE RNA regulates leaf development. Plant J. 2005;42:49–68. [PubMed]
  • Itaya K, Ui M. A new micromethod for the colorimetric determination of inorganic phosphate. Clin. Chim. Acta. 1966;14:361–366. [PubMed]
  • Jaeger KE, Wigge PA. FT protein acts as a long-range signal in Arabidopsis. Curr. Biol. 2007;17:1050–1054. [PubMed]
  • Khamis S, Chaillou S, Lamaze T. CO2 assimilation and partitioning of carbon in maize plants deprived of orthophosphate. J. Exp. Bot. 1990;41:1619–1625.
  • Köck M, Gross N, Stenzel I, Hause G. Phloem-specific expression of the wound-inducible ribonuclease LE from tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum cv. Lukullus) Planta. 2004;219:233–242. [PubMed]
  • LeBrasseur ND, MacIntosh GC, Pérez-Amador MA, Saitoh M, Green PJ. Local and systemic wound-induction of RNase and nuclease activities in Arabidopsis: RNS1 as a marker for a JA-independent systemic signaling pathway. Plant J. 2002;29:393–403. [PubMed]
  • Li D, Zhu H, Liu K, Liu X, Leggewie G, Udvardi M, Wang D. Purple acid phosphatases of Arabidopsis thaliana. Comparative analysis and differential regulation by phosphate deprivation. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:27772–27781. [PubMed]
  • López-Bucio J, Hernández-Abreu E, Sánchez-Calderón L, Nieto-Jacobo MF, Simpson J, Herrera-Estrella L. Phosphate availability alters architecture and causes changes in hormone sensitivity in the Arabidopsis root system. Plant Physiol. 2002;129:244–256. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Lough TJ, Lucas WJ. Integrative plant biology: role of phloem long-distance macromolecular trafficking. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2006;57:203–232. [PubMed]
  • Lynch J. Root architecture and plant productivity. Plant Physiol. 1995;109:7–13. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Marschner H. Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. 2. London: Academic Press; 1995.
  • Mudge SR, Rae AL, Diatloff E, Smith FW. Expression analysis suggests novel roles for members of the Pht1 family of phosphate transporters in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2002;31:341–353. [PubMed]
  • Palauqui JC, Elmayan T, Pollien JM, Vaucheret H. Systemic acquired silencing: transgene-specific post-transcriptional silencing is transmitted by grafting from silenced stocks to non-silenced scions. EMBO J. 1997;16:4738–4745. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Poirier Y, Bucher M. Phosphate transport and homeostasis in Arabidopsis. In: Somerville CR, Meyerowitz EM, editors. The Arabidopsis Book. Rockville, MD: American Society of Plant Biologists; 2002. doi/10.1199/tab.
  • Poirier Y, Thoma S, Somerville C, Schiefelbein J. A mutant of Arabidopsis deficient in xylem loading of phosphate. Plant Physiol. 1991;97:1087–1093. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • del Pozo JC, Allona I, Rubio V, Leyva A, De la Pena A, Aragoncillo C, Paz-Ares J. Type 5 acid phosphatase gene from Arabidopsis thaliana is induced by phosphate starvation and by some other types of phosphate mobilising/oxidative stress conditions. Plant J. 1999;19:579–589. [PubMed]
  • Raghothama KG. Phosphate acquisition. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 1999;50:665–693. [PubMed]
  • Ramakers C, Ruijter JM, Deprez RH, Moorman AF. Assumption-free analysis of quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) data. Neurosci. Lett. 2003;13:62–66. [PubMed]
  • Robinson D. The responses of plants to non-uniformous supplies of nutrients. New Phytol. 1994;127:635–674.
  • Ruiz-Medrano R, Xoconostle-Cázares B, Lucas WJ. Phloem long-distance transport of CmNACP mRNA: implications for supracellular regulation in plants. Development. 1999;126:4405–4419. [PubMed]
  • Ruiz-Medrano R, Xoconostle-Cazares B, Lucas WJ. The phloem as a conduit for inter-organ communication. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2001;4:202–209. [PubMed]
  • Scheible W-R, Morcuende R, Czechowski T, Fritz C, Osuna D, Palacios-Rojas N, Schindelasch D, Thimm O, Udvardi MK, Stitt M. Genome-wide reprogramming of primary and secondary metabolism, protein synthesis, cellular growth processes, and the regulatory infrastructure of Arabidopsis in response to nitrogen. Plant Physiol. 2004;136:2483–2499. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Smith FW, Mudge SR, Rae AL, Glassop D. Phosphate transport in plants. Plant Soil. 2003;248:71–83.
  • Trull MC, Deikman J. An Arabidopsis mutant missing one acid phosphatase isoform. Planta. 1998;206:544–550. [PubMed]
  • Turnbull CG, Booker JP, Leyser HM. Micrografting techniques for testing long-distance signalling in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2002;32:255–262. [PubMed]
  • Voinnet O, Vain P, Angell S, Baulcombe DC. Systemic spread of sequence-specific transgene RNA degradation in plants is initiated by localized introduction of ectopic promoterless DNA. Cell. 1998;95:177–187. [PubMed]
  • Wang Y, Ribot C, Rezzonico E, Poirier Y. Structure and expression profile of the Arabidopsis PHO1 gene family indicates a broad role in inorganic phosphate homeostasis. Plant Physiol. 2004;135:400–411. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Williamson LC, Ribrioux SP, Fitter AH, Leyser OHM. Phosphate availability regulates root system architecture in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2001;126:875–882. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Xoconostle-Cázares B, Xiang Y, Ruiz-Medrano R, Wang HL, Monzer J, Yoo BC, McFarland KC, Franceschi VR, Lucas WJ. Plant paralog to viral movement protein that potentiates transport of mRNA into the phloem. Science. 1999;283:94–98. [PubMed]
  • Yoo BC, Kragler F, Varkonyi-Gasic E, Haywood V, Archer-Evans S, Lee YM, Lough TJ, Lucas WJ. A systemic small RNA signaling system in plants. Plant Cell. 2004;16:1979–2000. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Zrenner R, Stitt M, Schmidt R, Sonnewald U, Boldt R. Pyrimidine and purine biosynthesis and degradation in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2006;57:805–836. [PubMed]

Articles from Wiley-Blackwell Online Open are provided here courtesy of Wiley-Blackwell, John Wiley & Sons

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...