![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology Novel Transcription Factor-Like Function of Human Matrix Metalloproteinase 3 Regulating the CTGF/CCN2 Gene Departments of Biochemistry & Molecular Dentistry,1 Oral & Maxillofacial Rehabilitation,3 Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery & Biopathology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Okayama City, Okayama 700-8525, Japan,4 Bio-Dental Research Center, Okayama University Dental School, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Okayama City, Okayama 700-8525, Japan2 *Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Dentistry, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2-5-1, Shikata-cho, Okayama City, Okayama, Japan. Phone: 81-86-235-6645. Fax: 81-86-235-6649. E-mail: takigawa/at/md.okayama-u.ac.jp Received July 18, 2007; Revised August 14, 2007; Accepted December 15, 2007. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract Matrix metalloproteinase 3 (MMP3) is well known as a secretory endopeptidase that degrades extracellular matrices. Recent reports indicated the presence of MMPs in the nucleus (A. J. Kwon et al., FASEB J. 18:690-692, 2004); however, its function has not been well investigated. Here, we report a novel function of human nuclear MMP3 as a trans regulator of connective tissue growth factor (CCN2/CTGF). Initially, we cloned MMP3 cDNA as a DNA-binding factor for the CCN2/CTGF gene. An interaction between MMP3 and transcription enhancer dominant in chondrocytes (TRENDIC) in the CCN2/CTGF promoter was confirmed by a gel shift assay and chromatin immunoprecipitation. The CCN2/CTGF promoter was activated by overexpressed MMP3, whereas a TRENDIC mutant promoter lost the response. Also, the knocking down of MMP3 suppressed CCN2/CTGF expression. By cytochemical and histochemical analyses, MMP3 was detected in the nuclei of chondrocytic cells in culture and also in the nuclei of normal and osteoarthritic chondrocytes in vivo. The nuclear translocation of externally added recombinant MMP3 and six putative nuclear localization signals in MMP3 also were shown. Furthermore, we determined that heterochromatin protein gamma coordinately regulates CCN2/CTGF by interacting with MMP3. The involvement of this novel role of MMP3 in the development, tissue remodeling, and pathology of arthritic diseases through CCN2/CTGF regulation thus is suggested. Connective tissue growth factor (CTGF/CCN2) is a member of the CCN family of matricellular proteins and also has been designated Hcs24, FISP12, IGFBP8, IGFBP-rP2, βIG-M2, and ecogenin. The other CCN proteins include Cyr61/CCN1, NOV/CCN3, WISP1/CCN4, WISP2/CCN5, and WISP3/CCN6 (5, 26, 38, 39) as well, and they are structurally and functionally related glycoproteins involved in cell differentiation, proliferation, adhesion, migration, and the formation of the extracellular matrix. These matricellular functions of CCNs are involved in physiological processes such as wound healing, angiogenesis, morphogenesis, and embryogenesis as well as in pathological states including fibrotic disorders, cancer, and arthritis. Earlier we showed that CCN2 promotes endochondral ossification by acting on chondrocytes, osteoblasts, and endothelial cells (35, 37, 46). For example, CCN2 promotes physiological chondrocytic proliferation and extracellular matrix (ECM) formation. We also reported the regeneration of defects in articular cartilage in rat knee joints following treatment with recombinant CCN2 (36). Furthermore, ctgf-null mice were dead on delivery and were characterized by defective angiogenesis, the derangement of endochondral ossification, and dysmorphisms that occurred as a result of impaired chondrocyte proliferation and an abnormal ECM composition within the hypertrophic zone (24). Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are zinc-dependent endopeptidases that are involved in the remodeling and turnover of the ECM in physiological processes such as angiogenesis, wound healing, embryogenesis, and morphogenesis as well as in pathological states including cancers, myocardial infarction, fibrotic disorders, rheumatism, and osteoarthritis (33, 49). Cartilage is a connective tissue that is constructed by chondrocytes embedded within an ECM predominantly composed of collagens and proteoglycans. ECM remodeling is achieved by regulating the production and degradation of specific ECM components. MMPs, which comprise a large family of enzymes with differential abilities to degrade specific ECM components, play a vital role in this process. MMPs also cleave growth factors and their binding proteins, thereby activating or inhibiting specific signaling events (15). Of note, the expression and role of MMP3 have been investigated in the pathological status of articular cartilage, such as in osteoarthritis and rheumatism (1, 52). Recent study has demonstrated the existence and functions of intracellular MMPs and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs). TIMP-1 accumulates in the cellular nuclei in association with the cell cycle (54). Alternative splicing and promoter usage generate an intracellular MMP11 isoform directly translated as an active MMP (31). MMP2 is found in the nuclei of cardiac myocytes and is capable of cleaving poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) in vitro (28). MMP3 also is detected in the nuclei of hepatocytes and is involved in apoptosis (47). MT1-MMP exhibits an intracellular cleavage function and causes chromosome instability, and it cleaves centrosomal pericentrin in human cells but not in murine cells (12). The mechanisms of CCN2/CTGF induction/production have been well investigated (4, 26, 29); however, there have been few approaches to identify directly binding regulatory proteins of the CCN2/CTGF gene. Recently, we investigated cell type-specific mechanisms of CCN2/CTGF gene regulation and found a cis-acting element, transcription enhancer dominant in chondrocytes (TRENDIC), between positions −202 and −180 from the transcription start site of CCN2/CTGF (7), a region that previously had been predicted to contain an NF-1-like site (7, 13). In our previous study, the strong production of CCN2 from chondrocytic cells was estimated to be mediated by TRENDIC rather than by a juxtaposing Smad-binding element (SBE) (7, 23). In this present study, we subsequently cloned the cDNAs encoding TRENDIC-binding factors and unexpectedly found MMP3/stromelysin-1 to be one of them. We then investigated whether or not MMP3 is localized in the nuclei of chondrocytes in vitro and in vivo. Having found such localization, we also examined if the nuclear MMP3 could bind with enhancer sequences in the CCN2/CTGF promoter and activate CCN2/CTGF transcription, and we showed that it did so. Finally, we evaluated the properties of MMP3 as a transcription factor by analyzing nuclear MMP3-associated proteins (NuMAPs). MATERIALS AND METHODS HCS-2/8 cDNA phage library. The cDNA phage library was constructed by using a ZAP cDNA synthesis kit (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan) and a ZAP express predigested Gigapack cloning kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) according to the manufacturer's protocols. Total RNA was prepared from HCS-2/8 cells by an acid guanidinium-phenol-chloroform (AGPC) method. Polyadenylated RNA was prepared from the total RNA by using an Oligotex-dT30 Super mRNA purification kit (Takara, Otsu, Japan). First-strand cDNA was synthesized by using linker primer 5′-CTCGAGTTTTTTTTTTTT and 5-methyl-dCTP. Second-strand cDNA was synthesized by using RNase H and DNA polymerase I. The double-strand cDNA was blunted by using Pfu DNA polymerase. The cDNA was added to a phosphorylated EcoRI adapter, digested by XhoI, and inserted in a ZAP express vector digested with EcoRI and XhoI. The average length of the insert cDNA of the library was confirmed by PCR to be approximately 2 kb. Southwestern screening. We performed Southwestern screening as previously described, with a slight modification (53). The Escherichia coli XL1-Blue MRF′ strain was infected with the lambda phage library and then spread on NZY agar plates containing 0.5 M isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG). Formed plaques were lifted onto nitrocellulose membranes (GE Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden). The double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) of four tandem repeats of TRENDIC was prepared by annealing the following oligonucleotides: 4× TRENDIC-s, 5′-ACG CGT [(CTG TGA GCT GGA GTG TGC CAGC) CAG]4 CTC GAG-3′; 4× TRENDIC-as, 5′-CTC GAG [CTG (GCT GGC ACA CTC CAG CTC ACAG)]4 ACG CGT-3′. The annealed probe was end labeled with [γ-32P]ATP and was applied to the membranes in binding buffer (10 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, containing 50 mM KCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol [DTT], 0.25% skim milk, and 50 μg/ml of denatured and undenatured salmon sperm DNA). After the membranes had been washed three times with a wash buffer (10 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, containing 250 mM KCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, and 0.25% skim milk), they were exposed to X-ray films. The positive plaques were picked up for subsequent secondary and tertiary screenings as well. The final cDNA clones in a pBK-cytomegalovirus vector were obtained by in vivo excision using the E. coli XLOLR strain. DNA sequencing and computer analysis. The cDNA cloned into each plasmid was sequenced by the dideoxy chain termination method (42) with a BigDye Terminator cycle sequencing ready reaction kit, version 2.0 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA), and an ABI PRISM 310 genetic analyzer (Applied Biosystems). The sequences were analyzed by using BLASTn, Evidence Viewer, and UniGene online services at the NCBI website (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). These data on the cloned genes are summarized in Table 1.
Cell culture. The following human-derived cells were used: human chondrosarcoma-derived chondrocytic HCS-2/8 cells (40, 51), MDA-MB-231 breast carcinoma cells, HeLa cells derived from human cervical cancer, and SaOS-2 osteosarcoma-derived cells. A COS7 monkey kidney-derived cell line also was used. Cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's minimum essential medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) in humidified air containing 5% CO2 at 37°C. For immunocytochemistry and internalization studies, glass chamber slides (4 or 8 well) were coated with 50 μg/ml of collagen (Cellmatrix type I-C; Nitta-Gellatin, Osaka, Japan) for 30 min before cells were seeded. Antibodies. We used the following anti-MMP3 antibodies: anti-MMP3 N-terminal region (5052; Sigma, St. Louis, MO), anti-MMP3 hinge region (4802; Sigma), anti-MMP3 C-terminal domain (4927; Sigma), and anti-MMP3 catalytic (CAT) domain antibody (4190; Sigma). We also used anti-CCN2/CTGF (AF660; R&D), anti-histone H3 (06-599; Upstate), anti-Sox6 (S7193; Sigma), anti-α-tubulin immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) (T9026; Sigma), anti-cathepsin D (C-20; Santa Cruz Biotech, Santa Cruz, CA), anti-lamin A/C monoclonal IgM (sc-7293; Santa Cruz), and anti-β-actin (AC-74; Sigma). We used the following antibodies to detect tags: anti-Flag M2 (Sigma), anti-Myc tag (Abcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom), and anti-glutathione S-transferase (anti-GST) (GE Healthcare) antibodies. An antidigoxigenin alkaline phosphatase-conjugated Fab (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) was used in electrophoresis mobility shift assays (EMSA). For Western blotting, we used horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies against anti-mouse IgG (Amersham) and anti-rabbit IgG (Dako, Copenhagen, Denmark). An anti-rabbit IgG rhodamine conjugate (Sigma) was used for immunostaining. We used these antibodies at the concentrations instructed by the manufacturer. The MMP3 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit was purchased from Daiichi Pure Chemicals (Tokyo, Japan). Preparation of subcellular fraction proteins. The nuclear and cytoplasmic proteins were prepared by using a CelLytic NuCLEAR extraction kit (Sigma) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The subcellular fractions were prepared by using a ProteoExtract subcellular proteome extraction kit (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Total cell lysate was prepared by using a CelLytic M reagent (Sigma) according to the manufacturer's protocols. The protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma) was added at the appropriate steps. SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis. Extracted proteins were heated at 95°C for 5 min in sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) sample buffer in the presence of 5% 2-mercaptoethanol and separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) in 12% polyacrylamide gel. Alternatively, proteins were heated at 70°C for 10 min in lithium dodecyl sulfate sample buffer containing 50 mM DTT and were separated in a 10% Bis-Tris NuPAGE gel (Invitrogen) in morpholinepropanesulfonic acid running buffer containing an antioxidant. Semidry electroblotting was carried out using a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Hybond P; GE Healthcare). The membrane was blocked in Tris-buffered saline containing 0.05% Tween 20 (TBST) and 5% skim milk for 30 min at room temperature (RT). After being blocked, the membrane was incubated with the primary antibody overnight at 4°C and subsequently was incubated with the secondary antibody for 1 h at RT in the blocking solution. The blot was visualized by using an enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) Western blotting analysis system (GE Healthcare) with chemiluminescence detection. The photogram was obtained by autoradiography or by using an ECL minicamera (GE Healthcare). The band signals obtained by Western blotting were quantified by using ImageJ, version 1.37 (Wayne Rasband, NIH). Recombinant proteins, MMP3 activator, and inhibitors. A recombinant human proenzyme MMP3 (rhMMP3; R&D) was purchased and used for the molecular weight control and the internalization assay. For other experiments, we used our purified rhMMP3, prepared as described below. Organomercurial (4-aminophenyl)mercuric acetate (APMA) (Sigma) was dissolved in 50 mM NaOH. Active MMP3 was prepared by incubating proenzyme MMP3 (final concentration, 83.3 nM) with 1 mM of APMA in Tris buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, containing 5 mM CaCl2 and 0.05% Triton X-100) at 37°C for 4 h. All MMP inhibitors were purchased from Calbiochem and were dissolved and stored in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). Before use, they were diluted 100-fold once in a cell culture medium (1% DMSO) and then added to cultured cells (final concentration, 0.01% DMSO). Transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) (10 ng/ml) was purchased from Peprotech (Rocky Hill, NJ). Stromelysin endopeptidase activity assay. The stromelysin endopeptidase activity assay was carried out by using the fluorescence resonance energy transfer peptide substrate Mca-RPKPVE-Nval-WRK(Dnp)-NH2 fluorogenic substrate II (R&D, Minneapolis, MN) (32). The substrate (10 μM) was mixed with enzyme or nuclear extract in a Tris buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, containing 5 mM CaCl2 and 0.05% Triton X-100) and incubated at 37°C. The relative fluorescence units (RFUs) of the reactant in a 96-well black plate were measured by using a Fluoroskan AscentFL (Labsystem, Helsinki, Finland). Immunocytochemistry. For immunocytochemistry, cells were fixed in 4% (wt/vol) paraformaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 15 min, washed in TBS, and permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100 for 15 min. Incubation with primary and secondary antibodies was performed in PBS containing 1.5% normal goat serum and 0.05% Triton X-100 at RT for 1 h, respectively. After three washes with TBS, the mounting and DNA staining were performed by using ProLong gold antifade reagents with 4′,6-diamino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (Molecular Probes, Invitrogen). Cells were observed with an immunofluorescence microscope (Biozero; Keyence, Osaka, Japan) or a Radiance 2100 laser scanning system (Bio-Rad). Conjugation of Cy3 to rhMMP3. For the conjugation of Cy3 to rhMMP3, the Tris-based solvent of rhMMP3 was replaced with sodium carbonate-sodium bicarbonate buffer (pH 9.3) by use of a Microcon YM-30 (Millipore, Billerica, MA), and the concentration was adjusted to 100 μg/ml. MMP3 (50 μl) was added to a vial of Cy3 monoreactive dye (GE Healthcare) and was incubated at RT for 30 min with mixing every 10 min. The labeled MMP3 was desalted and separated from the unconjugated Cy3 on a MicroSpin G-25 column (GE Healthcare) preequilibrated with PBS. Internalization studies. The cells in chamber slides were washed once with prewarmed serum-free medium and incubated with Cy3-MMP3 (1 μg/ml) in the serum-free medium at 37°C for 5, 10, 15, 30, or 60 min and subsequently were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 15 min. The cells were stained with 10 nM Sytox green nucleic acid stain (Molecular Probes, Invitrogen) in TBS for 20 min and mounted in ProLong antifade reagents (Molecular Probes, Invitrogen). The cells were observed by confocal laser microscopy as described below, and Cy3-positive cells were classified into three groups: cells with cytoplasm-dominant signals, cells with both cytoplasmic and nuclear signals, and cells with nucleus-dominant signals. Confocal laser scanning microscopy. Confocal laser scanning was carried out with a Radiance 2100 laser scanning system equipped with an argon and krypton laser (excitation wavelengths of 488 and 568 nm) (Bio-Rad) through an Eclipse TE2000-U microscope (Nikon) with a ×60 objective lens. The scan was visualized with the software Laser Sharp 2000 (Bio-Rad). NLS analysis. Nuclear localization signals (NLSs) in MMP3 were predicted by the PSORTII program (http://psort.nibb.ac.jp/helpwww2.html#src) (34). Several arginine- and lysine-rich sequences in MMP3 also were selected for analysis. pEGFP-NLSs were constructed as described below. COS7 cells were cultured in the 4-well chamber slides and were transfected with 200 ng of a series of pEGFP-NLS constructs by the aid of Fugene 6 transfection reagent (Roche). After being cultured for 24 h, cells were fixed with 4% formaldehyde in PBS and mounted with a fluorescent mounting medium (Dako). The subcellular localization of the enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) was visualized with confocal laser scanning microscopy. EMSA. EMSA was carried out as described previously (7) by using a digoxigenin system (Roche). For preparing the probes, sense and antisense oligonucleotides were annealed in a TEN buffer (10 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA, 100 mM NaCl, pH 8.0) and labeled with digoxigenin-11-UTP by using terminal transferase (Roche). The following pairs of oligonucleotides were annealed: TRENDIC-s (5′-CTG TGA GCT GGA GTG TGC CAG C-3′) and TRENDIC-as (5′-GCT GGC ACA CTC CAG CTC ACA G-3′); BCE1/TbRE-s (5′-CTG AGT GTC AAG GGG TCA GGA-3′) and BCE1/TbRE-as (5′-TCC TGA CCC CTT GAC ACT CAG-3′); and Seq2-s (5′-GAA TCA GGA GTG GTG CGA AG-3′) and Seq2-as (5′-CTT CGC ACC ACT CCT GAT TC-3′). The cellular or nuclear extract (5 μg) was preincubated with antibodies for 15 min at RT. Subsequently, 60 fmol of probes was added to the 0.5× binding buffer [10 mM HEPES, pH 7.6, containing 0.5 mM EDTA, 5 mM (NH4)2SO4, 0.5 mM DTT, 1% Tween 20, and 15 mM KCl] with 5 ng/ml of poly(dI-dC) for 15 min at RT. rhMMP3 (300 ng) was incubated with 45 fmol of probe, 50 ng/ml of poly-l-lysine, and 5 ng/ml of poly(dI-dC) in the binding buffers for 15 min. Electrophoresis was performed in a 6% polyacrylamide Tris-borate-EDTA (TBE) gel in a 0.5× TBE buffer for 60 to 100 min. Electroblotting was carried out on a positively charged nylon membrane (GE Healthcare). The UV cross-linking and detection of digoxigenin were carried out according to the manufacturer's protocols (Roche). Probe CCN2p160, which contains a CCN2 promoter DNA fragment between positions −292 and −137, was prepared from a plasmid template by PCR and labeled with digoxigenin. For EMSA performed with rhMMP3, MMP3 inhibitor (0.5 mM) was added to each reaction. For supershift assays, rhMMP3 and an antibody (2 μg) were preincubated at 4°C for 40 min before the addition of the probes. For competitive EMSA, the recombinant protein and competitor were preincubated at 4°C for 5 min before the addition of the probe. Poly-l-lysine (0.5 or 1.0 μg/reaction) was used. ChIP assay. The chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay was carried out according to the manufacturer's protocol (Upstate) with a slight modification. A half million HCS-2/8 cells were seeded in each well of a 6-well plate and were cultured for 48 h with a medium change at 24 h. Formaldehyde (final concentration, 1%) was added to the medium, and the cells were incubated for 10 min at 37°C. The cells were washed twice and scraped in ice-cold PBS containing a protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma) and then centrifuged for 4 min at 200 × g at 4°C. Subsequently, the cells were lysed in 200 μl of SDS lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.1, containing 10 mM EDTA and 1% SDS) for 10 min on ice. DNA was sheared by three 10-s rounds of sonication on ice by using a Handy Sonic model UR-20P (Tomy Seiko, Tokyo, Japan) at 30% of maximum power. After centrifugation at 10,000 × g at 4°C for 10 min, the supernatant was diluted 10-fold in ChIP dilution buffer (16.7 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8, containing 167 mM NaCl, 1.2 mM EDTA, 0.01% SDS, 1.1% Triton X-100, and protease inhibitor cocktail), and 1% of it was retained as the input. The sample was precleared by rotating it with 80 μl (4%) of a 50% salmon sperm DNA-50% protein A-agarose slurry (Upstate) for 30 min at 4°C. After a brief centrifugation, the supernatant was rotated with or without the anti-MMP3 CAT domain antibody (1:500; Sigma) overnight at 4°C and was further incubated after adding 60 μl (3%) of the 50% salmon sperm DNA-50% protein A-agarose slurry at 4°C for 1 h. The protein A-agarose-antibody-antigen complex was centrifuged at 300 × g at 4°C for 1 min, and the pellet was washed once with low-salt wash buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.1, containing 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 0.1% SDS, and 1% Triton X-100), once with high-salt wash buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.1, containing 500 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 0.1% SDS, and 1% Triton X-100), once with LiCl wash buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.1, containing 0.25 M LiCl, 1% NP-40, 1% deoxycholate, and 1 mM EDTA), and twice with TE buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 1 mM EDTA). The antigen complex was eluted by being mixed and rotated in 250 μl of freshly prepared elution buffer (1% SDS, 0.1 M NaHCO3). The elution step was repeated, and the eluates were combined. A 4% volume of 5 M NaCl was added to the eluate and to the input sample. The cross-linked chromatin complex was reversed by being heated at 65°C for 4 h, and DNA was purified using QIAquick spin columns (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). PCR was carried out using Prime STAR HS DNA polymerase (Takara) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Ten percent of the total purified DNA was used for the PCR in 50 μl of reaction mixture. The 204 bp of CCN2 enhancer fragment between −292 and −88 was amplified by using the primer pair Seq2-s (5′-GAA TCA GGA GTG GTG CGA AG-3′) and 110bp-as (5′-ATT CCT CGC ATT CCT CCC CAC CT-3′) in 30 cycles of PCR under the following conditions: 98°C for 10 s, 62°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 30 s. The 215-bp cDNA of GAPDH was amplified by using the primer pair GAPDH NEO LCL (5′-GCC AAA AGG GTC ATC ATC TC-3′) and GAPDH NEO LCR (5′-GTC TTC TGG GTG GCA GTG AT-3′) in 30 cycles of PCR under the following conditions: 98°C for 10 s, 65°C for 20 s, and 72°C for 20 s. The PCR products were analyzed by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis. Plasmid constructs. The cDNA of MMP3 cloned in pBK-CMV by Southwestern screening was subcloned into the p3xFlag-myc vector (Sigma) via a PCR-based method, and it was designated p3Flag-MMP3-myc. A series of CTGF/CCN2 promoter-luciferase reporter constructs were described previously (7-9). The cDNA of MMP3 was subcloned from the p3Flag-MMP3-myc vector to the pCold-TFII vector for expression in E. coli. Expression plasmids for MMP3 domains (full length [FL] and active forms, the prodomain, the combination of the CAT and Hinge domains [CAT+Hinge], and hemopexin-like repeat [PEX]) and MMP3 point mutants (H218R, H228R, and H218/228R) were constructed via a PCR-mediated mutagenesis method. The cDNA of GST was recombined from the pGEX-6P-3 vector (Amersham) to the pCold-TFII vector (Takara) using HindIII and SalI sites by a PCR-mediated method to constitute pCold-GST. The cDNAs of heterochromatin protein 1α (HP1α), HP1γ, NF45, nuclear receptor corepressor 1 (NCoR1), and chromatin assembly factor p48/retinoblastoma binding protein 4/7 (CAFp48/RBBP4) were prepared from mRNA of HCS-2/8 cells via reverse transcription-PCR and were subcloned into the pCold-GST vector. For the preparation of pEGFP-NLS constructs, sense and antisense oligonucleotides for NLSs were annealed and subcloned into the pEGFP-C1 vector (Clontech, Takara) between XhoI and EcoRI sites. These constructs are designated pEGFP-NLS0 to pEGFP-NLS5. All constructs were confirmed by DNA sequencing. pcDNA3.1(−)-3HA (p3xHA) was constructed by inserting a three-hemagglutinin (HA) tag in the pcDNA3.1(−) vector (Invitrogen). pcDNA3.1(−)HP1γ-3HA, pcDNA3.1(−)NF45-3HA, pcDNA3.1(−)RBBP4-3HA, and pcDNA3.1(−)DDOST-3HA were constructed via PCR-mediated subcloning. All constructs were confirmed by DNA sequencing and Western blotting. DNA transfection and luciferase assay. Cationic liposome-mediated DNA transfection was carried out with a Fugene 6 transfection reagent according to the manufacturer's optimized methodology (Roche). For reporter gene assays, cells were seeded in 12-well plates and cultured for 12 to 24 h. Subsequently, cells were transfected with a total of 1 μg of plasmid DNA in the reporter/effecter/control ratio of 2:1:1 or 10:10:1. Medium was changed 20 h after the transfection. After being cultured for a further 24 h, cells were lysed in 200 μl of 1× passive lysis buffer (Promega, Madison, WI) with gentle rocking for 20 min and were collected. Luciferase assays were carried out by using a Dual Glo luciferase assay system (Promega), as described previously, on a smaller scale (17). Relative luciferase activities were calculated as the ratios of firefly luciferase activity to Renilla luciferase activity. siRNA and gene knockdown studies. The specific short interfering RNAs (siRNAs) were predicted and synthesized by iGENE (Sapporo, Japan). The siRNA targeting MMP3 (siM3-1369) was an oligoduplex of 5′-GAG UUU GAC CCA AAU GCA AAG AAA G-AG-3′ (sense) and 5′-CUU UCU UUG CAU UUG GGU CAA ACU C-AU-3′ (antisense). The control was an oligoduplex of 5′-UUA GUG GUG AAU AUA ACA AGC UCU C-AG-3′ (sense) and 5′-GAG AGC UUG UUA UAU UCA CCA CUA A-AU-3′ (antisense). This control double-strand RNA (dsRNA) was predicted not to be homologous to known mRNA sequences of vertebrates. For transient gene knockdown studies, cells were seeded in 12-well plates and cultured for 24 h. Cells were transfected with siRNA (25 nM) with the aid of 1 μl of Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and were further cultured for 24 h. After being trypsinized, the cells were collected by centrifugation at 300 × g for 5 min. Cytoplasmic RNA was isolated by using RNeasy minicolumns (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's protocol. For reporter gene assays, 500 ng of the reporter construct and 50 ng of the phRL-TK(int−) control vectors (Promega) were transfected at 8 h after the siRNA transfection. The medium was changed 24 h later, and the cells were lysed at 48 h after the reporter transfection. The luciferase assay was performed as described above. A retroviral vector (pSINsi-hU6; Takara, Otsu, Japan) that expresses the short hairpin RNA (shRNA) targeting MMP3 (shMMP3) or scrambled shRNA was constructed by inserting the following sense-loop-antisense DNA sequence: shMMP3, 5′-G AGT TTG ACC CAA ATG CAA AGA AAG GTG TGC TGT CCC TTT CTT TGC ATT TGG GTC AAA CTC-3′, or scrambled shRNA, 5′-T TAG GGG ATA AGT ACG GTT GAA TCT GTG TGC TGT CCA GAT TCA ACC GTA CTT ATC CCC TAA-3′. 293T cells were cotransfected with an established combination of viral protein expression vectors, and then the conditioned media were prepared. HCS-2/8 cells (2 × 105/well of 6-well plates) were cultured overnight, and then the medium was changed to 1 ml of DMEM containing 10% FBS, 8 μg Polybrene, and 40 μl of the virus-containing conditioned medium. One milliliter of DMEM containing 10% FBS was added 6 h after the infection. The medium was changed every 3 days. Total RNA was prepared 2 weeks after the infection by using Isogen (Nippongene, Tokyo, Japan). cDNA synthesis and real-time PCR were performed as described below. Reverse transcription and real-time PCR. Reverse transcription was carried out with 500 ng of the cytoplasmic RNA by using Omniscript reverse transcriptase (Qiagen) and oligo(dT) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The real-time PCR was carried out as described previously (7) using a LightCycler system (Roche) with Sybr green (Toyobo) according to the manufacturer's directions. The PCR conditions were as follows: primary denaturation at 95°C for 30 s, followed by 45 cycles of PCR at 95°C for 5 s, 65°C (for MMP3 and CCN2) or at 60°C (for GAPDH) for 10 s, and 72°C for 15 s. The signals were collected at 72°C in every cycle. The specific primers for real-time PCR were designed and synthesized by NGRL (Sendai, Japan) as MMP3LCL (5′-CAG GCT TTC CCA AGC AAA TA-3′) and MMP3LCR (5′-GTG CCC ATA TTG TGC CTT CT-3′) for human MMP3. The nucleotide sequences of the primer pairs for CCN2 and GAPDH were previously described (7). Coimmunoprecipitation and LC-MS. The anti-MMP3 antibody affinity columns were prepared by using antibodies described above and a ProFound mammalian coimmunoprecipitation kit (Pierce, Rockford, IL) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Eluate (20% of the total) was used for the subsequent tryptic digestion using an in-solution tryptic digestion and guanidination kit (Pierce). The eluted proteins were reduced in ultrapure water containing 5 mM DTT and 25 mM ammonium bicarbonate at 95°C for 5 min. To minimize disulfate bond formation and side chain modification, the alkylation of the samples was carried out by adding iodoacetamide (IAA; 10 mM at final concentration) at RT for 20 min in the dark. The protein samples were digested by adding activated trypsin (final concentration, 3 ng/μl) and incubating them at 30°C overnight. Formic acid was added (final concentration, 0.1%). One microliter of the peptide samples was applied to nanospray high-performance liquid chromatography chip-ion trap-mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry (MS/MS) with an Agilent 1100 liquid chromatography (LC)/MSD Trap XCT Ultra series system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA). The MS and MS/MS data were analyzed by the data analysis software Spectrum Mill, version 3.3 (Agilent). The cutoff score for proteins was 8.0. The score was defined based on the covering rate for amino acid sequences and the frequency of detected fragments. To remove the background signals, we excluded the data obtained with a control IgG column from those obtained with the anti-MMP3 columns. Recombinant protein preparation. Recombinant proMMP3, GST, GST-fused HP1α, HP1γ, NF45, NCoR1(1-152), and CAFp48/RBBP4 were prepared by a cold shock system (Takara) according to the manufacturer's protocol. These recombinant proteins were designed to be fused with a trigger factor (Takara), which improves protein solubility. E. coli Rosetta2(DE3)pLysS-competent cells (Invitrogen) were transformed by the pCold-derived vectors described above. Transformed clones were cultured in 2 ml of Luria-Bertani broth containing 500 μg/ml of carbenicillin at 37°C for 8 h. Cells were further cultured in 10 to 500 ml of the broth at 37°C until an optical density at 600 nm of between 0.4 and 0.5 was reached. The induction of the protein synthesis was carried out by cooling the E. coli at 15°C for 30 min and further shaking the sample for 24 h at 15°C after the addition of 0.5 mM IPTG. Cellular pellets were obtained by centrifugation, frozen at −80°C, melted, suspended in appropriate volumes of lysis buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 8.0, containing 500 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 1 μM pepstatin A, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride [PMSF]), disrupted by four 30-s sets of sonication, and centrifuged at 17,000 × g for 15 min at 4°C. To confirm the recombinant protein production in the supernatants, we carried out SDS-10% PAGE and Coomassie brilliant blue (CBB) staining using CBB R-250 (Sigma). Bovine serum albumin (BSA) was used as a concentration standard. GST pull-down assay. The GST pull-down assay was carried out by using the soluble fractions including recombinant proMMP3, GST, and GST-fused proteins as described above. Twenty microliters of glutathione-Sepharose 4B beads (GE Healthcare) was washed once with 500 μl of the Tris buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, containing 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, and 1% Triton X-100) with protease inhibitors (0.5 mM PMSF and 1 μM pepstatin A). The beads were mixed with the soluble fractions containing 3, 10, or 30 μg of GST-fused recombinant proteins in 500 μl of the Tris buffer, and the soluble fraction containing 10 μg of recombinant proMMP3 tagged with Flag3 was added. The mixture was rotated for 2 h at 4°C, and the precipitant was washed four times with 500 μl of the Tris buffer. The precipitant was dissolved in 20 μl of 2× SDS sample buffer containing β-mercaptoethanol, was boiled at 95°C for 5 min, and was separated by SDS-10% PAGE. Western blot analysis was performed using an anti-Flag M2 antibody (Sigma) or anti-GST antibody (GE Healthcare). Animals, tissue preparation, and immunohistochemistry. The hind limbs of 8-week-old female BALB/c nu/nu mice (Clea, Tokyo, Japan) were fixed with 10% neutral phosphate-buffered formalin. The experimental osteoarthritis was induced by injecting monoiodoacetic acid (MIA; Sigma) into the intraarticular spaces of 6-month-old Wister rats, as described previously (36). These procedures were approved by the Animal Committee of the Okayama University Dental School. The animals were processed for histological analysis at 6 weeks after the injections. The specimens were decalcified in a 14% EDTA solution for 2 to 3 weeks and then embedded in paraffin, and the sections were prepared. After deparaffinization, the antigen in the section was activated by immersion in 10 mM target retrieval solution (Dako) in a microwave oven operating for 2 min. The sections were blocked in TBS with 10% FBS for 10 min and incubated with the anti-MMP3 C-terminal antibody (1:100) in TBS containing 3% BSA at 4°C overnight. Afterwards, the sections were incubated with anti-rabbit IgG tetramethyl rhodamine isothiocyanate conjugate (1:100) for 1 h in TBS containing 3% BSA and subsequently were incubated with 10 nM Sytox green nucleic acid stain (Molecular Probes, Invitrogen) in TBS for 1 h. Fluorescent medium (Dako) was used for mounting. The sections were observed by confocal laser scanning microscopy. Statistics. Data were expressed as means ± standard deviations, and the statistical significance of differences in mean values was assessed by Student's unpaired t tests. Differences among the mean values were considered significant at a P of <0.05. RESULTS MMP3 in the cell nucleus. To identify TRENDIC-binding nuclear factors, we performed Southwestern screening by using a cDNA library of HCS-2/8 cells, since TRENDIC was first identified as an enhancer element dominant in these cells (7). Among the three genes cloned (Table 1), we further analyzed MMP3, because MMP3/stromelysin-1 is known to have an important role in cartilaginous tissues, although it had been recognized to act in the extracellular environment. In order to investigate if MMP3 was present in the cell nucleus, we prepared subcellular fractions of HCS-2/8 cells and analyzed the distribution of MMP3 by Western blotting. Surprisingly, MMP3 was detected in the nuclear extract of HCS-2/8 cells (Fig. (Fig.1A).1A
DNA-binding ability of MMP3. We originally cloned MMP3 as a DNA-binding factor (Table 1). To examine whether MMP3 could bind to TRENDIC or not, we first performed EMSAs. The TRENDIC probe (pTRENDIC) was shifted in the gel with nuclear proteins of HCS-2/8 cells (Fig. (Fig.2A,2A
To confirm the specificity of the TRENDIC-MMP3 binding, a competitive EMSA was performed. The probe-protein interaction was inhibited by the addition of cold TRENDIC in a dose-dependent manner (10-, 100-, or 1,000-fold excess of cold TRENDIC) (Fig. (Fig.2C2C To further examine the interaction between the genomic CCN2 enhancer and the nuclear MMP3, we carried out a ChIP assay. In the chromatin immunoprecipitate obtained from HCS-2/8 cells by using anti-MMP3 antibody, the genomic CCN2 enhancer region between positions −292 and −88, which contains enhancers such as TRENDIC, BCE1/TbRE, and Seq2, was detected by the ChIP assay (Fig. (Fig.2E).2E Effects of intracellular MMP3 on CCN2 promoter activity. To clarify if MMP3 could modulate the CCN2 promoter activity, we cotransfected several cell lines with an MMP3 expression vector (p3xFlagMMP3-myc; schemed in Fig. Fig.3A)3A
Effects of MMP3 knockdown on CCN2 gene expression. To investigate if the endogenous MMP3 was involved in the abundant production of CCN2 from HCS-2/8 cells (7, 9), we knocked down MMP3 mRNA by RNA interference technology and evaluated the effect of the siRNA on CCN2 mRNA and protein expression and promoter activity. Transient transfection of siMMP3-1369 (20 nM) decreased MMP3 mRNA expression to 14% of the control dsRNA (siNC) level (Fig. (Fig.4A,4A
Next, to evaluate the effect of the MMP3 siRNA (siMMP3) on MMP3 and CCN2 protein production, 0, 20, 50, or 100 nM of siMMP3-1302 or control dsRNA (siNC) was transfected into HCS-2/8 cells, and MMP3, CCN2, and GAPDH protein production in the lysate was evaluated by Western blotting. As a result, the levels of FL MMP3 (Fig. (Fig.4B,4B To further confirm the regulation of CCN2 gene expression by MMP3 in HCS-2/8 cells, a retroviral vector that expressed shMMP3 or scrambled shRNA was constructed and infected into HCS-2/8 cells, and MMP3 and CCN2 expression was evaluated 2 weeks after the infection. The shMMP3 retroviral vector successfully knocked down the level of expression of MMP3 mRNA to 35% of that of the control (Fig. (Fig.4D,4D If MMP3 is a critical and general regulator of CCN2, the expression of CCN2 is anticipated to be significantly lower in other cells without MMP3 expression. To confirm this, we comparatively analyzed the expression of CCN2 and MMP3 in HCS-2/8 and HeLa cells. In contrast to its expression in HCS-2/8 cells, MMP3 mRNA expression was deficient in HeLa cells (Fig. (Fig.4E).4E MMP3 domains required for CCN2/CTGF promoter activation. In order to determine the involvement of individual domains of MMP3 in the CCN2/CTGF trans-activation function, several assemblages of MMP3 domains were expressed in COS7 and HCS-2/8 cells, and the CCN2/CTGF promoter reporter assay was carried out. The expression of the MMP3 domain deletion mutants in COS7 cells was confirmed by Western blotting (Fig. (Fig.5C).5C
A proteolytic activity of MMPs has been known to be zinc dependent. In the part of the CAT domain forming the active site, a Zn2+ ion is coordinated by a chelate bond with three histidine residues found in the conserved sequence HEXXHXXGXXH and is called a zinc-binding motif. The change of any one of the histidines to arginine was reported to cause the loss of the proteolytic activity of MMPs (27). To clarify if the trans-activation ability of MMP3 for CCN2 expression is dependent on proteolytic activity or not, we constructed plasmids expressing catalytically dead mutants of MMP3. As a result, the alteration of a histidine residue at position 218 (H218) to arginine (H218R mutant) resulted in a decrease of the trans-activation ability of MMP3 for the CCN2 promoter (Fig. (Fig.5D).5D Uptake and nuclear translocation of extracellular MMP3. Next, to clarify the subcellular dynamics of MMP3, we prepared Cy3-labeled rhMMP3 (Cy3-MMP3), added it to the medium of HCS-2/8 cells in culture, and observed its behavior with a confocal laser scanning microscope. The Cy3-MMP3 signals emanated from the cellular membrane or cytoplasm between 5 and 60 min after the addition of Cy3-MMP3 to the cell culture (Fig. (Fig.6A,6A
Effect of LMB on the induction of CCN2/CTGF by MMP3. In order to demonstrate that nuclear translocated MMP3 trans activates the CCN2/CTGF promoter, leptomycin B (LMB) was employed. LMB is an antibiotic with membrane permeability, and it has been known to inhibit the nuclear export function of CRM1/exportin 1 by directly binding to its cysteine residue. We hypothesized that the nuclear export of MMP3 could be CRM1 dependent, and thus LMB could cause the nuclear accumulation of MMP3 and the enhancement of the activation of the CCN2/CTGF promoter by nuclear MMP3. Exactly as we predicted, LMB enhanced the trans-activation effect of MMP3 on the CCN2/CTGF promoter (Fig. (Fig.6D).6D Domain structure and nuclear localization signals of MMP3. In addition to the classical domain structure of MMP3, we found and predicted several novel domains and signal sequences in MMP3 (Fig. (Fig.7A).7A
Classically, the nuclear import of proteins is mediated by importins α and β, which recognize basic amino acid clusters, designated NLSs, on the protein to be imported (3, 34). In order to assess if MMP3 entered the nucleus via this classical pathway, we sought putative NLSs in MMP3. Six lysine- and arginine-rich sequences were found in the amino acid sequence of MMP3, and we designated them NLS0 to NLS5 (Fig. 7A, B Identification of NuMAPs. If MMP3 plays a certain role in the nuclei, it should be associated with other proteins to exhibit the downstream phenomenon, whether it cleaves them or not. To clarify this point, we applied the nuclear extract of HCS-2/8 cells to anti-MMP3 antibody columns and then eluted the bound proteins and analyzed them by using an LC-MS/MS system (Fig. (Fig.8A).8A
To clarify the function of these NuMAPs and the collaborative function with intracellular MMP3 for CCN2/CTGF transcription, mammalian NuMAP expression plasmids were constructed (Fig. (Fig.8E)8E MMP3 can be (auto)cleaved into the CAT domain and the PEX domain in or out of the cells, and the PEX domain and CAT+Hinge domain possess a trans-activation ability for the CCN2/CTGF promoter at a level comparable to that of FL MMP3. In addition, both contain putative NLSs. To clarify the localization of NuMAPs (HP1γ, NF45, and RBBP4) with MMP3s (FL, PEX, and CAT domains), these proteins or domains were coexpressed in COS7 cells, and then the colocalization was investigated by using confocal microscopy. Firstly, HP1γ, NF45, and RBBP4 were observed mainly to be localized only in the nucleus (Fig. 8H to J Subcellular localization of MMP3 in normal and osteoarthritic cartilaginous tissues. To investigate the relationship between subcellular MMP3 localization and the pathophysiology of articular cartilage in animals, we immunohistochemically examined MMP3 in normal and osteoarthritic articular cartilages with a confocal laser microscope. MMP3 was immunopositive in the normal articular cartilage of 2-month-old mice (Fig. (Fig.9A,9A
Effects of MMP inhibitors on CCN2/CTGF promoter activity and on nuclear stromelysin-like endopeptidase activity. To investigate if the proteinase activity of MMP3 was associated with the observed transcriptional activation of CCN2, we added MMP inhibitors to the culture medium of HCS-2/8 cells and subsequently quantified the CCN2 promoter activities. A specific inhibitor of human MMP3 (MMP3 inhibitor II) suppressed the CCN2 promoter activity in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 10A
To determine further if the nuclei of HCS-2/8 cells exerted stromelysin endopeptidase activity, we tested the ability of a nuclear extract of HCS-2/8 cells to cleave a fluorogenic substrate of stromelysin (32). Initially, the stromelysin activity of MMP3 (8.3 nM) activated by 1 mM APMA was successfully detected by measuring the number of RFUs emitted by the cleavage of the peptide substrate (Fig. 10B Specificity of MMP3-TRENDIC interaction and its consensus sequence. The DNA-binding ability of MMP3 was already demonstrated in Fig. Fig.2,2
DISCUSSION In this report, we demonstrated a novel aspect of MMP3; i.e., that it acted as a transcription factor in cell nuclei. First, we cloned MMP3 as a gene encoding a TRENDIC-binding factor (Table 1). Next, the existence of MMP3 in the nuclei (Fig. (Fig.11 In this study, most of the data were obtained by using HCS-2/8 chondrocytic cells, a cell line that has been a useful model in chondrocyte biology. The cells have been used as a model of normal and osteoarthritis chondrocytes in a number of studies (30, 40, 51). Of note, CCN2 originally was cloned as a hypertrophic chondrocyte-specific gene product 24 (Hcs24) from HCS-2/8 cells and was demonstrated to function as an endochondral ossification-promoting factor (50). Indeed, HCS-2/8 cells produced abundant amounts of CCN2 compared to the amount produced by other cell types (7, 9). The HCS-2/8 cell line was established from a chondrosarcoma, but the expression of CCN2 in cartilaginous tumors is negatively related with the level of their malignancy (45), indicating that HCS-2/8 cells can be a model of a normal phenotype of chondrocytes. This cell line also has been used for arthritis studies, because HCS-2/8 produces MMP3 and matrix degradation-related molecules in response to tumor necrosis factor alpha (16, 17, 41). In addition, MMP3 immunopositive cells were specifically expressed in normal articular cartilage of a 14-year-old human, while MMP9, MMP13, and ADAMTS4 were not detected (H. I. Roach, personal communication). We observed nuclear MMP3 in both normal and osteoarthritic cartilages (Fig. (Fig.8).8 The trans activation of the CCN2/CTGF promoter by the nuclearly translocated MMP3 is a major discovery in this study. One piece of evidence for this finding is that the knockdown of MMP3 resulted in a decrease in CCN2/CTGF expression (Fig. (Fig.4).4 The TGF-β/Smad signal regulates CCN2/CTGF gene expression at the level of transcription, and the activation of TGF-β by MMP3 in the extracellular microenvironment can indirectly activate CCN2/CTGF through TGF-βR/Smad signaling (7); however, the intracellular overexpression of MMP3 from the pMMP3 vector trans activated the CCN2/CTGF promoter (Fig. (Fig.3).3 MMP3-null mice have been reported to show delayed wound healing, joint inflammation/osteoarthritis, abnormal CD4+ physiology, increased susceptibility to bacterial infection, abnormal neuromuscular synapse morphology, and abnormal miniature end plate potential (48). CCN2/CTGF has been known to be a key player in the wound-healing process. Together with our discovery that nuclear MMP3 regulates CCN2/CTGF, the insufficient supply of CCN/CTGF in MMP3-null mice should result in a delayed wound-healing phenotype. Further investigation by using MMP3-null mice is under way. We should be careful to explain the mechanism of trans activation by MMP3 and the novel domain structure of MMP3, because MMP3 can cleave and activate itself. The overexpression of the MMP3 deletion mutants revealed that the PEX domain and CAT+Hinge domain can trans activate the CCN2/CTGF promoter per se as well as the FL or active form of MMP3 (Fig. (Fig.5A).5A The DNA-binding domain of MMP3 was revealed to be in the PEX domain, because the TRENDIC-nuclear protein interaction was blocked by the anti-PEX antibody (Fig. 2A, B In our study, recombinant MMP3 was translocated from outside of the cells into the nuclei (Fig. (Fig.6).6 We also found six putative NLSs in MMP3 for nuclear entry through the nucleopores (Fig. (Fig.7).7 Of note, Si-Tayeb et al. (47) also reported an NLS in MMP3 that is the same as one of the NLSs identified in our study (Fig. (Fig.7B).7B We detected FL MMP3 dominantly in the nuclear fraction of HCS-2/8 cells (Fig. (Fig.1)1 We identified several NuMAPs by performing the coimmunoprecipitation study (Fig. (Fig.8;8 As a NuMAP, NCoR1 also was identified, which is a transcription repressor that acts by promoting chromatin condensation and by preventing access to the gene by the transcription machinery. Another possible mechanism of CCN2 gene trans activation is that MMP3 degrades NCoR1 to prevent transcription repression. Recently, MMP2 was found in the nuclei of cardiac myocytes and is capable of cleaving PARP in vitro (28). Thus, PARP can be inactivated or activated by MMP3 itself, or MMP2 can be activated by MMP3. PARP has been known to perform poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation of the chromatin DNA for chromatin DNA maintenance. The cleavage and inactivation of PARP result in the inhibition of poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation and expose the DNase hypersensitive region. The exposure of such naked DNA can supply an MMP3-accessible region on DNA. Further genetic and epigenetic approaches will clarify the precise mechanisms of CCN2 induction by MMP3 acting with such cofactors. In this report, we showed that MMP3 from outside of the cells and in the cytoplasm was translocated into the nucleus, where MMP3 bound to DNA/chromatin and trans activated the CCN2 gene (Fig. (Fig.12).12
Acknowledgments We thank Takako Hattori, Takashi Nishida, Eriko Aoyama, Takeshi Yanagita, Harumi Kawaki, and Mamoru Ohuchida for their useful discussions and technical assistance. We acknowledge Yuki Nonami for secretarial assistance and thank Seiji Tamaru for technical assistance with the LC-MS/MS analysis. We appreciate Derek C. Radisky, Motomi Enomoto-Iwamoto, Kinichi Nakashima, and Koichi Ikuta for useful discussions and helpful suggestions. We thank H. I. Roach for informing us of unpublished data from a human case and Cindy Farach-Carson for analyzing signal sequences and for useful discussions. We thank the members of ODR, NILS, and NCGG for thoughtful actions in completing this work. This work was supported by Research Fellowships for Young Scientists of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science to T.E., Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (S) to M.T. and (C) to S.K. and a Grant-in-Aid for Exploratory Research to M.T. from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan (MEXT), and by grants from the Sumitomo Foundation to M.T. and the Foundation of Sanyo Broadcasting to S.K. Footnotes Published ahead of print on 2 January 2008.REFERENCES 1. Aigner, T., B. Kurz, N. Fukui, and L. Sandell. 2002. Roles of chondrocytes in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis. Curr. Opin. Rheumatol. 14578-584. [PubMed] 2. Bannister, A. J., P. Zegerman, J. F. Partridge, E. A. Miska, J. O. Thomas, R. C. Allshire, and T. Kouzarides. 2001. Selective recognition of methylated lysine 9 on histone H3 by the HP1 chromo domain. Nature 410120-124. [PubMed] 3. Benmerah, A., M. Scott, V. Poupon, and S. Marullo. 2003. Nuclear functions for plasma membrane-associated proteins? Traffic 4503-511. [PubMed] 4. Blom, I. E., R. Goldschmeding, and A. Leask. 2002. Gene regulation of connective tissue growth factor: new targets for antifibrotic therapy? Matrix Biol. 21473-482. [PubMed] 5. Brigstock, D. R. 2003. The CCN family: a new stimulus package. J. Endocrinol. 178169-175. [PubMed] 6. Chirco, R., X. W. Liu, K. K. Jung, and H. R. Kim. 2006. Novel functions of TIMPs in cell signaling. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2599-113. [PubMed] 7. Eguchi, T., S. Kubota, K. Kawata, Y. Mukudai, T. Ohgawara, K. Miyazono, K. Nakao, S. Kondo, and M. Takigawa. 2007. Different transcriptional strategies for ccn2/ctgf gene induction between human chondrocytic and breast cancer cell lines. Biochimie 89278-288. [PubMed] 8. Eguchi, T., S. Kubota, S. Kondo, T. Kuboki, H. Yatani, and M. Takigawa. 2002. A novel cis-element that enhances connective tissue growth factor gene expression in chondrocytic cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 295445-451. [PubMed] 9. Eguchi, T., S. Kubota, S. Kondo, T. Shimo, T. Hattori, T. Nakanishi, T. Kuboki, H. Yatani, and M. Takigawa. 2001. Regulatory mechanism of human connective tissue growth factor (CTGF/Hcs24) gene expression in a human chondrocytic cell line, HCS-2/8. J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 13079-87. [PubMed] 10. Emonard, H., G. Bellon, L. Troeberg, A. Berton, A. Robinet, P. Henriet, E. Marbaix, K. Kirkegaard, L. Patthy, Y. Eeckhout, H. Nagase, W. Hornebeck, and P. J. Courtoy. 2004. Low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein mediates endocytic clearance of pro-MMP-2.TIMP-2 complex through a thrombospondin-independent mechanism. J. Biol. Chem. 27954944-54951. [PubMed] 11. Galazka, G., L. J. Windsor, H. Birkedal-Hansen, and J. A. Engler. 1999. Spontaneous propeptide processing of mini-stromelysin-1 mutants blocked by APMA [(4-aminophenyl)mercuric acetate]). Biochemistry 381316-1322. [PubMed] 12. Golubkov, V. S., S. Boyd, A. Y. Savinov, A. V. Chekanov, A. L. Osterman, A. Remacle, D. V. Rozanov, S. J. Doxsey, and A. Y. Strongin. 2005. Membrane type-1 matrix metalloproteinase (MT1-MMP) exhibits an important intracellular cleavage function and causes chromosome instability. J. Biol. Chem. 28025079-25086. [PubMed] 13. Grotendorst, G. R., H. Okochi, and N. Hayashi. 1996. A novel transforming growth factor beta response element controls the expression of the connective tissue growth factor gene. Cell Growth Differ. 7469-480. [PubMed] 14. Hahn-Dantona, E., J. F. Ruiz, P. Bornstein, and D. K. Strickland. 2001. The low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein modulates levels of matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9) by mediating its cellular catabolism. J. Biol. Chem. 27615498-15503. [PubMed] 15. Hashimoto, G., I. Inoki, Y. Fujii, T. Aoki, E. Ikeda, and Y. Okada. 2002. Matrix metalloproteinases cleave connective tissue growth factor and reactivate angiogenic activity of vascular endothelial growth factor 165. J. Biol. Chem. 27736288-36295. [PubMed] 16. Hattori, T., H. Kawaki, S. Kubota, Y. Yutani, B. de Crombrugghe, K. von der Mark, and M. Takigawa. 2003. Downregulation of a rheumatoid arthritis-related antigen (RA-A47) by ra-a47 antisense oligonucleotides induces inflammatory factors in chondrocytes. J. Cell. Physiol. 19794-102. [PubMed] 17. Hattori, T., S. Kubota, Y. Yutani, T. Fujisawa, T. Nakanishi, K. Takahashi, and M. Takigawa. 2001. Change in cellular localization of a rheumatoid arthritis-related antigen (RA-A47) with downregulation upon stimulation by inflammatory cytokines in chondrocytes. J. Cell. Physiol. 186268-281. [PubMed] 18. Hayakawa, T. 2002. Multiple functions of tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs): a new aspect involving osteoclastic bone resorption. J. Bone Miner. Metab. 201-13. [PubMed] 19. Hediger, F., and S. M. Gasser. 2006. Heterochromatin protein 1: don't judge the book by its cover! Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 16143-150. [PubMed] 20. Heintzman, N. D., R. K. Stuart, G. Hon, Y. Fu, C. W. Ching, R. D. Hawkins, L. O. Barrera, S. Van Calcar, C. Qu, K. A. Ching, W. Wang, Z. Weng, R. D. Green, G. E. Crawford, and B. Ren. 2007. Distinct and predictive chromatin signatures of transcriptional promoters and enhancers in the human genome. Nat. Genet. 39311-318. [PubMed] 21. Hiragami, K., and R. Festenstein. 2005. Heterochromatin protein 1: a pervasive controlling influence. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 622711-2726. [PubMed] 22. Hishikawa, K., T. Nakaki, and T. Fujii. 2000. Connective tissue growth factor induces apoptosis via caspase 3 in cultured human aortic smooth muscle cells. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 39219-22. [PubMed] 23. Holmes, A., D. J. Abraham, S. Sa, X. Shiwen, C. M. Black, and A. Leask. 2001. CTGF and SMADs, maintenance of scleroderma phenotype is independent of SMAD signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 27610594-10601. [PubMed] 24. Ivkovic, S., B. S. Yoon, S. N. Popoff, F. F. Safadi, D. E. Libuda, R. C. Stephenson, A. Daluiski, and K. M. Lyons. 2003. Connective tissue growth factor coordinates chondrogenesis and angiogenesis during skeletal development. Development 1302779-2791. [PubMed] 25. Kawata, K., T. Eguchi, S. Kubota, H. Kawaki, M. Oka, S. Minagi, and M. Takigawa. 2006. Possible role of LRP1, a CCN2 receptor, in chondrocytes. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 345552-559. [PubMed] 26. Kubota, S., and M. Takigawa. 2007. Role of CCN2/CTGF/Hcs24 in bone growth. Int. Rev. Cytol. 2571-41. [PubMed] 27. Kurisu, G., T. Kinoshita, A. Sugimoto, A. Nagara, Y. Kai, N. Kasai, and S. Harada. 1997. Structure of the zinc endoprotease from Streptomyces caespitosus. J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 121304-308. [PubMed] 28. Kwan, J. A., C. J. Schulze, W. Wang, H. Leon, M. Sariahmetoglu, M. Sung, J. Sawicka, D. E. Sims, G. Sawicki, and R. Schulz. 2004. Matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) is present in the nucleus of cardiac myocytes and is capable of cleaving poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) in vitro. FASEB J. 18690-692. [PubMed] 29. Leask, A., and D. J. Abraham. 2006. All in the CCN family: essential matricellular signaling modulators emerge from the bunker. J. Cell Sci. 1194803-4810. [PubMed] 30. Lin, Z., C. Willers, J. Xu, and M. H. Zheng. 2006. The chondrocyte: biology and clinical application. Tissue Eng. 121971-1984. [PubMed] 31. Luo, D., B. Mari, I. Stoll, and P. Anglard. 2002. Alternative splicing and promoter usage generates an intracellular stromelysin 3 isoform directly translated as an active matrix metalloproteinase. J. Biol. Chem. 27725527-25536. [PubMed] 32. Nagase, H., C. G. Fields, and G. B. Fields. 1994. Design and characterization of a fluorogenic substrate selectively hydrolyzed by stromelysin 1 (matrix metalloproteinase-3). J. Biol. Chem. 26920952-20957. [PubMed] 33. Nagase, H., and J. F. Woessner, Jr. 1999. Matrix metalloproteinases. J. Biol. Chem. 27421491-21494. [PubMed] 34. Nakai, K., and P. Horton. 1999. PSORT: a program for detecting sorting signals in proteins and predicting their subcellular localization. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2434-36. [PubMed] 35. Nishida, T., S. Kubota, T. Fukunaga, S. Kondo, G. Yosimichi, T. Nakanishi, T. Takano-Yamamoto, and M. Takigawa. 2003. CTGF/Hcs24, hypertrophic chondrocyte-specific gene product, interacts with perlecan in regulating the proliferation and differentiation of chondrocytes. J. Cell. Physiol. 196265-275. [PubMed] 36. Nishida, T., S. Kubota, S. Kojima, T. Kuboki, K. Nakao, T. Kushibiki, Y. Tabata, and M. Takigawa. 2004. Regeneration of defects in articular cartilage in rat knee joints by CCN2 (connective tissue growth factor). J. Bone Miner. Res. 191308-1319. [PubMed] 37. Nishida, T., S. Kubota, T. Nakanishi, T. Kuboki, G. Yosimichi, S. Kondo, and M. Takigawa. 2002. CTGF/Hcs24, a hypertrophic chondrocyte-specific gene product, stimulates proliferation and differentiation, but not hypertrophy of cultured articular chondrocytes. J. Cell. Physiol. 19255-63. [PubMed] 38. Perbal, B. 2004. CCN proteins: multifunctional signalling regulators. Lancet 36362-64. [PubMed] 39. Perbal, B., and M. Takigawa. 2005. CCN proteins: a new family of cell growth and differentiation regulators, 1st ed. Imperial College Press, London, United Kingdom. 40. Saas, J., K. Lindauer, B. Bau, M. Takigawa, and T. Aigner. 2004. Molecular phenotyping of HCS-2/8 cells as an in vitro model of human chondrocytes. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 12924-934. [PubMed] 41. Sakai, T., F. Kambe, H. Mitsuyama, N. Ishiguro, K. Kurokouchi, M. Takigawa, H. Iwata, and H. Seo. 2001. Tumor necrosis factor alpha induces expression of genes for matrix degradation in human chondrocyte-like HCS-2/8 cells through activation of NF-kappaB: abrogation of the tumor necrosis factor alpha effect by proteasome inhibitors. J. Bone Miner. Res. 161272-1280. [PubMed] 42. Sanger, F., S. Nicklen, and A. R. Coulson. 1977. DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 745463-5467. [PubMed] 43. Schübeler, D. 2007. Enhancing genome annotation with chromatin. Nat. Genet. 39284-285. [PubMed] 44. Shaffer, K. L., A. Sharma, E. L. Snapp, and R. S. Hegde. 2005. Regulation of protein compartmentalization expands the diversity of protein function. Dev. Cell 9545-554. [PubMed] 45. Shakunaga, T., T. Ozaki, N. Ohara, K. Asaumi, T. Doi, K. Nishida, A. Kawai, T. Nakanishi, M. Takigawa, and H. Inoue. 2000. Expression of connective tissue growth factor in cartilaginous tumors. Cancer 891466-1473. [PubMed] 46. Shimo, T., T. Nakanishi, T. Nishida, M. Asano, M. Kanyama, T. Kuboki, T. Tamatani, K. Tezuka, M. Takemura, T. Matsumura, and M. Takigawa. 1999. Connective tissue growth factor induces the proliferation, migration, and tube formation of vascular endothelial cells in vitro, and angiogenesis in vivo. J. Biochem. 126137-145. [PubMed] 47. Si-Tayeb, K., A. Monvoisin, C. Mazzocco, S. Lepreux, M. Decossas, G. Cubel, D. Taras, J. F. Blanc, D. R. Robinson, and J. Rosenbaum. 2006. Matrix metalloproteinase 3 is present in the cell nucleus and is involved in apoptosis. Am. J. Pathol. 1691390-1401. [PubMed] 48. Somerville, R. P., S. A. Oblander, and S. S. Apte. 2003. Matrix metalloproteinases: old dogs with new tricks. Genome Biol. 4216. [PubMed] 49. Sternlicht, M. D., and Z. Werb. 2001. How matrix metalloproteinases regulate cell behavior. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 17463-516. [PubMed] 50. Takigawa, M., T. Nakanishi, S. Kubota, and T. Nishida. 2003. Role of CTGF/HCS24/ecogenin in skeletal growth control. J. Cell. Physiol. 194256-266. [PubMed] 51. Takigawa, M., T. Okawa, H. Pan, C. Aoki, K. Takahashi, J. Zue, F. Suzuki, and A. Kinoshita. 1997. Insulin-like growth factors I and II are autocrine factors in stimulating proteoglycan synthesis, a marker of differentiated chondrocytes, acting through their respective receptors on a clonal human chondrosarcoma-derived chondrocyte cell line, HCS-2/8. Endocrinology 1384390-4400. [PubMed] 52. van Bilsen, J. H., J. P. Wagenaar-Hilbers, M. C. Grosfeld-Stulemeijer, M. J. van der Cammen, M. E. van Dijk, W. van Eden, and M. H. Wauben. 2004. Matrix metalloproteinases as targets for the immune system during experimental arthritis. J. Immunol. 1725063-5068. [PubMed] 53. Yoshimura, T., J. Fujisawa, and M. Yoshida. 1990. Multiple cDNA clones encoding nuclear proteins that bind to the tax-dependent enhancer of HTLV-1: all contain a leucine zipper structure and basic amino acid domain. EMBO J. 92537-2542. [PubMed] 54. Zhao, W. Q., H. Li, K. Yamashita, X. K. Guo, T. Hoshino, S. Yoshida, T. Shinya, and T. Hayakawa. 1998. Cell cycle-associated accumulation of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1 (TIMP-1) in the nuclei of human gingival fibroblasts. J. Cell Sci. 1111147-1153. [PubMed] |
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
J Endocrinol. 2003 Aug; 178(2):169-75.
[J Endocrinol. 2003]Int Rev Cytol. 2007; 257():1-41.
[Int Rev Cytol. 2007]Lancet. 2004 Jan 3; 363(9402):62-4.
[Lancet. 2004]J Cell Physiol. 2003 Aug; 196(2):265-75.
[J Cell Physiol. 2003]J Cell Physiol. 2002 Jul; 192(1):55-63.
[J Cell Physiol. 2002]J Biochem. 1999 Jul; 126(1):137-45.
[J Biochem. 1999]J Bone Miner Res. 2004 Aug; 19(8):1308-19.
[J Bone Miner Res. 2004]Development. 2003 Jun; 130(12):2779-91.
[Development. 2003]J Biol Chem. 1999 Jul 30; 274(31):21491-4.
[J Biol Chem. 1999]Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2001; 17():463-516.
[Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2001]J Biol Chem. 2002 Sep 27; 277(39):36288-95.
[J Biol Chem. 2002]Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2002 Sep; 14(5):578-84.
[Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2002]J Immunol. 2004 Apr 15; 172(8):5063-8.
[J Immunol. 2004]J Cell Sci. 1998 May; 111 ( Pt 9)():1147-53.
[J Cell Sci. 1998]J Biol Chem. 2002 Jul 12; 277(28):25527-36.
[J Biol Chem. 2002]FASEB J. 2004 Apr; 18(6):690-2.
[FASEB J. 2004]Am J Pathol. 2006 Oct; 169(4):1390-401.
[Am J Pathol. 2006]J Biol Chem. 2005 Jul 1; 280(26):25079-86.
[J Biol Chem. 2005]Matrix Biol. 2002 Oct; 21(6):473-82.
[Matrix Biol. 2002]Int Rev Cytol. 2007; 257():1-41.
[Int Rev Cytol. 2007]J Cell Sci. 2006 Dec 1; 119(Pt 23):4803-10.
[J Cell Sci. 2006]Biochimie. 2007 Mar; 89(3):278-88.
[Biochimie. 2007]Cell Growth Differ. 1996 Apr; 7(4):469-80.
[Cell Growth Differ. 1996]EMBO J. 1990 Aug; 9(8):2537-42.
[EMBO J. 1990]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Dec; 74(12):5463-7.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977]Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2004 Nov; 12(11):924-34.
[Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2004]Endocrinology. 1997 Oct; 138(10):4390-400.
[Endocrinology. 1997]J Biol Chem. 1994 Aug 19; 269(33):20952-7.
[J Biol Chem. 1994]Trends Biochem Sci. 1999 Jan; 24(1):34-6.
[Trends Biochem Sci. 1999]Biochimie. 2007 Mar; 89(3):278-88.
[Biochimie. 2007]Biochimie. 2007 Mar; 89(3):278-88.
[Biochimie. 2007]J Biochem. 2001 Jul; 130(1):79-87.
[J Biochem. 2001]J Cell Physiol. 2001 Feb; 186(2):268-281.
[J Cell Physiol. 2001]Biochimie. 2007 Mar; 89(3):278-88.
[Biochimie. 2007]J Bone Miner Res. 2004 Aug; 19(8):1308-19.
[J Bone Miner Res. 2004]Biochimie. 2007 Mar; 89(3):278-88.
[Biochimie. 2007]Biochimie. 2007 Mar; 89(3):278-88.
[Biochimie. 2007]Cell Growth Differ. 1996 Apr; 7(4):469-80.
[Cell Growth Differ. 1996]Biochimie. 2007 Mar; 89(3):278-88.
[Biochimie. 2007]J Biochem. 2001 Jul; 130(1):79-87.
[J Biochem. 2001]J Biochem. 1997 Feb; 121(2):304-8.
[J Biochem. 1997]Dev Cell. 2005 Oct; 9(4):545-54.
[Dev Cell. 2005]Traffic. 2003 Aug; 4(8):503-11.
[Traffic. 2003]Trends Biochem Sci. 1999 Jan; 24(1):34-6.
[Trends Biochem Sci. 1999]Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2006 Apr; 16(2):143-50.
[Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2006]J Biol Chem. 1994 Aug 19; 269(33):20952-7.
[J Biol Chem. 1994]Biochemistry. 1999 Jan 26; 38(4):1316-22.
[Biochemistry. 1999]Biochimie. 2007 Mar; 89(3):278-88.
[Biochimie. 2007]Tissue Eng. 2006 Jul; 12(7):1971-84.
[Tissue Eng. 2006]Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2004 Nov; 12(11):924-34.
[Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2004]Endocrinology. 1997 Oct; 138(10):4390-400.
[Endocrinology. 1997]J Cell Physiol. 2003 Mar; 194(3):256-66.
[J Cell Physiol. 2003]Biochimie. 2007 Mar; 89(3):278-88.
[Biochimie. 2007]Biochimie. 2007 Mar; 89(3):278-88.
[Biochimie. 2007]J Biochem. 2001 Jul; 130(1):79-87.
[J Biochem. 2001]Dev Cell. 2005 Oct; 9(4):545-54.
[Dev Cell. 2005]Biochimie. 2007 Mar; 89(3):278-88.
[Biochimie. 2007]Genome Biol. 2003; 4(6):216.
[Genome Biol. 2003]Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2006 Mar; 25(1):99-113.
[Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2006]J Biol Chem. 2001 May 4; 276(18):15498-503.
[J Biol Chem. 2001]J Biol Chem. 2004 Dec 24; 279(52):54944-51.
[J Biol Chem. 2004]Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006 Jun 30; 345(2):552-9.
[Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006]Traffic. 2003 Aug; 4(8):503-11.
[Traffic. 2003]Am J Pathol. 2006 Oct; 169(4):1390-401.
[Am J Pathol. 2006]Am J Pathol. 2006 Oct; 169(4):1390-401.
[Am J Pathol. 2006]J Cell Sci. 1998 May; 111 ( Pt 9)():1147-53.
[J Cell Sci. 1998]J Bone Miner Metab. 2002; 20(1):1-13.
[J Bone Miner Metab. 2002]Eur J Pharmacol. 2000 Mar 24; 392(1-2):19-22.
[Eur J Pharmacol. 2000]Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2006 Apr; 16(2):143-50.
[Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2006]Cell Mol Life Sci. 2005 Dec; 62(23):2711-26.
[Cell Mol Life Sci. 2005]Nature. 2001 Mar 1; 410(6824):120-4.
[Nature. 2001]Nat Genet. 2007 Mar; 39(3):311-8.
[Nat Genet. 2007]Nat Genet. 2007 Mar; 39(3):284-5.
[Nat Genet. 2007]