![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Clinical Investigation The initial steps of ovarian cancer cell metastasis are mediated by MMP-2 cleavage of vitronectin and fibronectin 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Section of Gynecologic Oncology, and Gordon Center for Integrative Science, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA. 2Department of Pathology and Comprehensive Cancer Center, UCSF, San Francisco, California, USA. 3Committee on Cancer Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA. Address correspondence to: Ernst Lengyel, University of Chicago, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA. Phone: (773) 702-6722; Fax: (773) 702-5411; E-mail: elengyel/at/uchicago.edu. Received August 30, 2007; Accepted January 30, 2008. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract Most patients (80%) with ovarian cancer (OvCa) present with metastatic disease. Attachment of OvCa cells to peritoneum and omentum represents the first rate-limiting step for metastatic spread. Therefore, identifying factors regulating cell attachment in the abdominal cavity is critical to the development of therapeutic agents. We show here that MMP-2 expression was upregulated in OvCa cells upon attachment to their microenvironment. Downregulation of MMP-2 mRNA or pharmacological inhibition of MMP-2 proteolytic function, in both human OvCa primary cells and cell lines, reduced attachment of OvCa cells to a 3D organotypic model of metastatic OvCa, full human omentum or peritoneum, and in vivo to mouse peritoneum and omentum. Absence of MMP-2 in the host did not alter OvCa adhesion, as determined utilizing mice harboring homozygous null mutations in either the Mmp2 or Mmp9 genes. Conversely, adhesion induced upregulation of MMP-2 mRNA in OvCa cells. MMP-2 inhibition in OvCa cells through pharmacological or antibody treatment prior to i.p. dissemination in nude mice significantly decreased tumor growth and metastasis and extended survival. MMP-2 enhanced peritoneal adhesion of OvCa cells through cleavage of ECM proteins fibronectin (FN) and vitronectin (Vn) into small fragments and increased binding of OvCa cells to these FN and Vn fragments and their receptors, α5β1 and αVβ3 integrin. These findings indicate that MMP-2 expressed by metastatic OvCa cells functionally regulates their attachment to peritoneal surfaces.
Introduction Ovarian cancer (OvCa) has the highest mortality rate of all gynecologic tumors and is the fifth leading cause of cancer death among US women (1). It is predominantly confined within the abdominal cavity and, unlike breast, colon, or lung cancer, rarely metastasizes hematogenously. Once an ovarian epithelial cell undergoes neoplastic transformation, it freely disseminates throughout the peritoneal cavity, carried by peritoneal fluid that facilitates attachment to peritoneum and omentum. The omentum is a large fat pad (approximately 12 × 12 cm) located inferior to the stomach and draped over the small bowel. It is the most common metastatic site (80%) for OvCa cells (2) followed by implants on the abdominal peritoneum. Identification of cofactors regulating OvCa cell attachment to omentum and/or peritoneum would have tremendous clinical utility, by enabling identification of cellular or molecular targets that could be pursued therapeutically and thus, enabling blockade of a critical step necessary for OvCa metastasis within the peritoneal cavity.
A role for MMPs in OvCa development has been postulated based upon the observation that several members of the MMP family are upregulated during OvCa neoplastic progression (3). When MMPs were first characterized (4), it was hypothesized that their major contribution to cancer development was merely to degrade ECM molecules, thereby facilitating cancer cell migration/invasion across tissue boundaries. More recent insights have, however, defined a more complex role for MMPs in cancer. They are now recognized as key regulators of various neoplastic processes by virtue of their ability to mediate differentiation, proliferation, and survival of neoplastic cells (5), release mitogenic growth factors from cell surfaces and from ECM reservoirs, and regulate tumor-associated angiogenesis (6, 7). In spite of these revelations, no MMPs have been identified as being absolutely required for neoplastic cell migration/invasion into ectopic tissue compartments in vivo. Based upon their perceived importance as mediators of ECM remodeling, clinical trials assessing efficacy of broad spectrum MMP inhibitors (MMPI) in patients with solid tumors, including non–small cell lung (8), pancreatic (9), gastric (10), and OvCas (11), were undertaken in patients with recurrent, metastatic, chemotherapy-resistant tumors. Unfortunately, none of the MMPI evaluated improved patient survival (12).
Interestingly, several groups using preclinical mouse models of de novo cancer development (7, 13) revealed that MMPI efficacy may be best achieved during earlier stages of tumor development, prior to appearance of bulky and/or metastatic disease. In the RIP1-Tag2 model of pancreatic islet carcinogenesis (7), tumor burden was significantly reduced in tumor-prone mice when mice were treated with the MMPI batimastat during early neoplasia, prior to malignant conversion and development of islet adenocarcinomas. Moreover, if tumor-prone mice were treated later in their disease progression, when tumors were already present, there was no significant effect (14). Similarly, growth of OvCa xenografts is significantly diminished if mice are treated with batimastat immediately following tumor cell injection; whereas, if batimastat is administered after solid tumors are established, minimal efficacy is achieved (13). Similar results have also been reported with gastric cancer and platinum-resistant OvCa xenografts (15, 16), indicating that efficacy of MMPI therapy is most significant when administered early in disease progression. Furthermore, in the clinical arena, it has now been reported that treatment of early-stage cancer with an MMP-2/-9 inhibitor (marimastat) might increase survival (9). We previously examined expression of MMP-2 and MMP-9 in human OvCa tissue and found that essentially all invasive OvCas, including early stage I cancers as well as metastatic implants, overexpress both MMP-2 and MMP-9, while normal ovarian tissue exhibits significantly lower levels of expression (17, 18), indicating that MMP-2 and MMP-9 are upregulated early in OvCa progression.
Given these findings, we hypothesized that type IV collagenases, e.g., MMP-2/-9, might be important regulators for early steps of OvCa metastasis. We report here that upregulation of MMP-2 in OvCa cells is critical for their adhesion to the mesothelial lining of the peritoneum and omentum. Using an orthotopic model of OvCa cell metastasis, we found that early inhibition of MMP-2 reduced ovarian tumor cell adhesion and metastasis and thus, significantly prolonged survival of experimental mice. Subsequent or repeated treatment of solid tumors with an MMP-2 inhibitor minimally reduced ovarian tumor metastasis and had no effect on survival. MMP-2 increased the adhesive capability of OvCa cells by specific cleavage of fibronectin (FN) and vitronectin (Vn), allowing for enhanced attachment of OvCa cells to FN and Vn fragments through α5β1 and αVβ3 integrin. Therefore, our findings implicate MMP-2 in OvCa adhesion and indicate that therapeutic efficacy of MMP-2–selective inhibitors will be best achieved clinically if applied prior to peritoneal dissemination.
Results Coculture of OvCa cells with mesothelial and stromal cells induces MMP-2 and MMP-9. The peritoneal cavity, including the omentum, is covered by mesothelium consisting of a confluent layer of epithelial mesothelial cells, lying juxtaposed to a layer of ECM where fibroblasts are embedded. Because peritoneal surfaces are the most common site of OvCa metastases (2), we established what we believe to be a novel organotypic 3D coculture model mimicking human omentum, in order to examine the role of MMP-2 and MMP-9 in adhesion (Figure (Figure1A).1
To determine which cell population was necessary for the increased presence of MMP-2/-9, SKOV3ip1 cells were fluorescently labeled and plated on the 3D culture. Four hours later, cells were isolated by flow cytometry and immunoblotted to assess MMP-2 and MMP-9 levels (Figure (Figure1D).1 Matrix remodeling activity of MMP-2 is the result of a stoichiometric interaction between membrane-type 1–MMP/MMP-14 (MT1-MMP/MMP-14), a transmembrane receptor and proteolytic activator of pro–MMP-2 (3), and TIMP-2, a tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase. Binding of SKOV3ip1 cells to the 3D culture did not alter MT1-MMP or TIMP-2 protein expression (Figure (Figure1F).1 In view of these findings, we hypothesized that MMP-2 or MMP-9 mediated OvCa cell adhesion to mesothelium. To test this, we took a 3-pronged approach and evaluated attachment of 2 established OvCa cell lines (SKOV3ip1, HeyA8) and primary OvCa cells to the 3D coculture (Figure (Figure2A)2
Initial attachment of OvCa cells to the abdominal cavity is mediated by MMP-2. The peptide used to inhibit adhesion in Figure Figure22
Host cells do not contribute the MMP-2 or MMP-9 necessary for peritoneal adhesion. Several studies have reported that MMP-2 and MMP-9 are expressed by activated stromal cells that thereby promote tumorigenesis (26). Moreover, in OvCa, expression of MMP-2 and MMP-9 mRNA has not only been localized to stromal cells but also to carcinoma cells (27). Therefore, we sought to determine the principal cellular source of MMP-2 and/or MMP-9 detected on OvCa cells. We found that blocking MMP-2 and MMP-9 function on HPMCs or HPFs with the MMP-2/-9 peptide or with the MMP-2 or MMP-9 antibodies did not alter adhesion of SKOV3ip1 cells (Figure (Figure4A).4
Adhesion induces MMP-2 transcription. In view of previous reports that MMP-2 is regulated transcriptionally (29, 30), we investigated whether interaction of OvCa cells with host cells stimulated MMP-2 mRNA expression. Fluorescently labeled SKOV3ip1 cells were added to the various tissues, attached cells collected by fluorescent-activated cell sorting (FACS), and MMP-2 mRNA detected by quantitative real-time PCR. The relative expression of MMP-2 mRNA was 20-, 10-, and 7-fold higher in OvCa cells attached to the 3D coculture (Figure (Figure5A),5
Single pretreatment of OvCa cells with an MMP-2/-9 inhibitor or an MMP-2 antibody prevents peritoneal metastases and increases survival. Our interpretation of the data resulting from the analyses above was that MMP-2 functionally regulates adhesion of OvCa cells to the mesothelium covering the abdominal cavity. Since adhesion is the first step in OvCa metastasis, we speculated that a 1-time pretreatment (prevention study) of OvCa with an MMPI might reduce peritoneal attachment and, therefore, diminish metastasis. Indeed, after 4 weeks, mice that received an i.p. injection of SKOV3ip1 that had been treated with an MMPI developed 68% fewer metastatic tumor nodules and 65% less tumor weight than mice injected with control treated cells (P < 0.001; Figure Figure6A).6
Pretreatment of SKOV3ip1 with the MMP-2–blocking antibody also resulted in a significant reduction of metastatic nodules (54%; P < 0.001) and tumor weight (68%; P < 0.001) as compared with an isotypic control antibody (Figure (Figure6C).6 We then analyzed tumors from the prevention studies to understand whether a single treatment with the MMPI or MMP-2 antibody affected other established MMP-2/-9 functions such as gelatinolytic activity, proliferation, apoptosis, or angiogenesis (Figure (Figure6E).6 MMP-2 cleaves Vn and FN. MMP-2 can cleave various ECM proteins (3), raising the possibility that cleavage of 1 or more ECM components into smaller fragments allows for the improved adhesion of OvCa cells to ECM. To test this hypothesis, we first confirmed the presence of Vn and FN in human omentum. Vn and FN are highly expressed in the ECM of the human omentum, and mesothelial cells produce Vn and FN as shown by western blot analysis (Figure (Figure7A).7
To test whether cleavage of Vn and FN by MMP-2 was of functional significance, adhesion assays were conducted on cleaved Vn or FN fragments. Indeed, significantly more SKOV3ip1 cells adhered to culture wells coated with MMP-2–cleaved Vn and FN than to wells coated with full-length Vn or FN alone (Vn, 1.4 ± 0.04-fold increase, P < 0.0001; FN, 1.7 ± 0.04-fold increase, P < 0.0001; Figure Figure7C),7 Since OvCa cell adhesion is enhanced following cleavage of FN and Vn, we examined the functional contribution of the FN (α5β1 integrin) and Vn receptors (αVβ3 integrin) during the initial phase of adhesion. α5 and β3 integrin were inhibited by siRNAs, and adhesion assays to the different ECM proteins performed (Figure (Figure7F).7 Discussion Our contention that MMP-2 is a significant regulator of OvCa adhesion is supported by experiments demonstrating that a cyclic peptide preferentially inhibits MMP-2 gelatinolytic activity (22) and reduces adhesion to the 3D coculture, full human omentum/peritoneum, and in vivo binding to mouse omentum/peritoneum (Figure (Figure2).2 We found that induction of MMP-2 in OvCa cells by normal omental fibroblasts and mesothelial cells involves direct cell-cell interaction, extending previous reports that dermal (21) and ovarian (38) fibroblasts induce MMP-2 expression in cancer cells. MMP-2 is not provided by the host, since deletion of host-derived MMP-2 or MMP-9, using RAG1/MMP-2 and MMP-9–deficient mice, did not alter OvCa cell adhesion. The specific interaction between mesothelial cells/fibroblasts and OvCa cells may explain why OvCa metastasis favors the peritoneum and omentum and rarely seeds to secondary sites that are not covered by mesothelium. In our studies, MMP-2 was induced in the cancer cells upon binding to mesothelium. Still, in situ hybridization in different cancers, including ovarian (27, 39), has localized MMP-2 mRNA expression to fibroblasts. However, these represent a snapshot of MMP expression at an advanced tumor stage, when the OvCa has already established. In contrast, our study examines the initial step of OvCa metastasis, when cancer cells “meet” unprepared, resting mesothelial cells and fibroblasts. In the earliest phase of metastasis, contact of mesothelium with OvCa cells induces MMP-2 mRNA expression in the cancer cells through a consensus p53 transcription factor binding site in the MMP-2 promoter at –1,659 bp. Consistent with this finding, we found that upon attachment of SKOV3ip1 cells to the 3D culture, p53 protein and mRNA expression is induced and mutation of the p53 binding site in the MMP-2 promoter abrogates induction of MMP-2.
The SKOV3 cell line is widely used as a p53-null cell line, and previously no p53 mRNA or protein was detected in SKOV3 or SKOV3ip1 cells when cultured on plastic (31, 40, 41). However, only 1 study investigated the status of p53 alleles using Southern blot analysis, wherein a deletion or rearrangement of only 1 of the p53 alleles was reported (42). On the contrary, SKOV3 cells were reported as wild type for p53 in another study (43). Given that the SKOV3ip1 cell clone we used also does not express p53 on plastic but that p53 mRNA and protein are induced in the SKOV3ip1 cells upon binding to the 3D culture, we suggest that in the SKOV3ip1 cells one p53 allele is still intact (as suggested by the Southern blot in ref. 42), allowing for inducible p53 expression.
The mechanism by which MMP-2 enhances peritoneal adhesion of OvCa cells involves enzymatic activity and cleavage of FN and Vn. When a panel of integrin antibodies was tested for their ability to inhibit adhesion, α5β1 and αvβ3 integrin–blocking antibodies inhibited adhesion, but this effect was abolished when OvCa cells were preincubated with the MMPI or an MMP-2 antibody. This finding led us to investigate the possibility that MMP-2 cleaves Vn and FN that is highly expressed in peritoneal and omental basement membranes, as well as on HPMCs. Indeed, we found that MMP-2 cleaves FN and Vn. In addition, OvCa cells adhere more efficiently to the smaller FN and Vn cleavage products than the full-length proteins, and the increased adhesion is abrogated when α5β1 and αVβ3 integrin are knocked down by siRNA. We propose the following general mechanism for the initial steps of OvCa adhesion. Contact of OvCa cells with mesothelium induces MMP-2 transcription, followed by protein expression and activation. MMP-2 then cleaves various ECM components, including Vn and FN, into smaller fragments, thereby allowing for improved binding of OvCa adhesion receptors (α5β1 and αVβ3 integrin) to fragmented ECM (Figure (Figure8).8
We found that MMP-9 is highly expressed by mesothelial cells and fibroblasts and that OvCa cells express MMP-9 once they bind the 3D coculture. Nevertheless, we concluded that MMP-9 expression was not significant for initial adhesion, since we saw no inhibition of adhesion when blocking MMP-9. Nonetheless, several reports suggest that MMP-9 promotes growth and angiogenesis. Huang et al. (46) identified tumor-infiltrating macrophages as a significant source of MMP-9 and demonstrated that SKOV3ip1 cells growing in MMP-9–deficient mice are less metastatic. In a skin carcinogenesis model, MMP-9 supplied by innate immune cells is critical for tumor progression (26), tumor cell proliferation, and angiogenesis (47). In the RIP1-Tag2 model of pancreatic islet carcinogenesis, MMP-2 was important for tumor initiation but played no role in angiogenesis (7). These findings, together with our studies, assign unique functions to MMP-2 and MMP-9 during tumorigenesis. MMP-2 is important for adhesion, while MMP-9 exerts a functional role during angiogenesis and tumor progression.
While we remain disappointed by the failure of MMPI in clinical studies aimed at targeting late-stage disease, we are optimistic that our findings, which demonstrate that inhibition of MMP-2 during early metastasis provides a survival advantage, will encourage the reassessment of MMPI as an anticancer therapeutic agent. The MMPI, marimastat, that has selective affinity for MMP-2/-9, was evaluated in a phase III trial enrolling patients with platinum resistant, recurrent OvCa. Although the trial was not formally published, abstracts and reviews (11) reported that treatment with marimastat did not block tumor growth or improve survival, a result that is in line with other unsuccessful trials of MMPI in cancer (8, 10). The data presented here, demonstrating that MMP-2 is important for adhesion and early metastasis, explain at least partially, why marimastat failed in the treatment of OvCa — patients treated with marimastat had widely metastatic tumors that are less dependant on MMPs for continued growth and survival. Our prevention study shows clearly that treatment with an MMP-2 inhibitor will only exhibit efficacy if administered prior to ovarian tumor cell attachment to the peritoneal cavity. While the clinical relevance of beginning therapy before tumor inoculation is at first glance debatable, there is a subgroup of OvCa patients who might benefit from early treatment with an MMPI. These are patients whose disease at the time of surgery is limited to the ovary but have tumor cell positive ascites (FIGO stage IC to IIIA), or patients who at the end of surgery were rendered macroscopically tumor free and have only presumed “microscopic disease”. Early i.p. treatment with an MMPI may reduce peritoneal attachment, although it would have less impact on the growth of cells that have already attached and have formed colonies. In summary, we have demonstrated that adhesion of OvCa cells to the peritoneal cavity is mediated, at least in part, by MMP-2 through cleavage of FN and Vn and that in a mouse model, pretreatment with an MMPI can reduce metastasis as well as significantly prolong survival.
Methods Reagents. Collagen I (rat tail), FN, and Vn were purchased from BD Biosciences. Anti-vimentin, anti–prolyl-hydroxylase, anti-Ki67, and anti-CD31 antibodies were purchased from Dako Cytomation. Anti-CAM 5.2 against cytokeratin 8 was from Becton Dickinson. The β1 integrin antibody was purchased from Santa Cruz, while MT1-MMP (clone AB8102), TIMP-2, β4 integrin (clone ASC-3), αVβ3 integrin (clone LM609), α5 integrin (clone P1D6), and MMP-2 (clone CA-4001) antibodies were purchased from Chemicon. Anti-actin antibody was from Cell Signaling Technology. The human OvCa cell lines, SKOV3ip1 and HeyA8, were provided by Gordon B. Mills (MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA). Anti–MMP-2 and –MMP-9 (clone IM09L) monoclonal antibodies were purchased from EMD Bioscience. MMP-2/MMP-9 Inhibitor III, monoclonal anti-p53 (clone Ab-5) antibody, pantropic anti-p53 (clone Ab-7) antibody, fatty-acid free bovine serum albumin, and streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase conjugate were purchased from Calbiochem. Negative control, MMP-2, MMP-9, and α5 and β3 integrin siRNA were purchased from Ambion Inc.
Animal husbandry. Mice carrying homozygous-null mutations in the MMP2 (28), MMP9 (48) and RAG-1 gene (6) were backcrossed into the FVB/n mouse strain and maintained in the homozygous-null (–/–) state. Immunodeficient MMP2–/– and MMP9–/– mice were generated by successive intercrossing (49). For all other experiments female athymic nude mice were used. All procedures involving animals were approved by the Institutional Committee on Animal Care, University of Chicago.
Adhesion and invasion assay. Primary OvCa cells were isolated from ascites as described (50). HPMCs and HPFs were isolated from normal human omentum, and purification was verified by vimentin, keratin 8 (CAM5.2), and prolyl-hydroxylase stainings (20). HPMCs and HPFs at early passages (passages 1–3) were used for the experiments to minimize dedifferentiation and modification of the original phenotype.
The 3D culture was assembled by embedding HPFs in collagen I and plating HPMCs as a confluent layer on top (20). Adhesion assays to the 3D culture and full human omentum or peritoneum were conducted as previously described (20). Each adhesion assays was run in triplicate. For adhesion assays to mouse peritoneum, SKOV3ip1 cells were fluorescently labeled with CMFDA (Invitrogen), and a single-cell suspension (4 × 106 cells/ml in 0.5 ml PBS) was injected into the peritoneal cavity of athymic nude or RAG1–/–, MMP2–/–, or MMP-9–/– mice. After 4 hours, mice were sacrificed and full-thickness peritoneum and omentum excised. After washing to remove nonadherent cells, the tissue was lysed with 1% NP-40 and fluorescence was measured with a fluorescence spectrophotometer (Synergy HT) (33).
For the nitrocellulose adhesion assay (35), FN digested with APMA-activated MMP-2 or full-length FN was resolved on a native Tris-HCl gel (4%–20%). Proteins were transferred on nitrocellulose, the blot was washed with PBS and incubated with SKOV3ip1 cells for 4 hours. After adhesion, the blot was washed, cells were fixed with 10% formalin, stained with 0.1% amido black, and destained with a methanol/acetic acid/water solution (90:2:8). Cells bound to nitrocellulose stain dark blue. For the competition adhesion assays, SKOV3ip1 cells were preincubated with FN or cleaved FN fragments, and then an adhesion assay performed. The invasion assay was conducted for 24 hours as described (33).
Inhibition experiments. The SKOV3ip1 cells were incubated for 18 hours with MMP-2/-9 inhibitor (10 μm), anti–MMP-2 (4 μg/ml), anti–MMP-9 (6 μg/ml), or anti–MT1-MMP (12 μg/ml) neutralizing antibody. For integrin experiments, the cells were pretreated with anti–MMP-2 or mouse IgG antibody (18 hours), followed by treatment with antibodies against α5, β1, β4, αVβ3 integrin or specific isotype mouse IgG (10 μg/ml). The cells were then used for in vitro or in vivo adhesion assays. MMP-2, MMP-9, α5, β3 integrin, and control siRNA constructs were transfected into 2.4 × 105 SKOV3ip1 cells using siPORT NeoFX transfection reagent (Ambion Inc.). After culturing cells for 72 hours (optimal knockdown time), they were used in the in vitro or in vivo adhesion assays.
MMP activity measurement. Gelatinolytic zymography was performed as described with conditioned serum-free media (51).
Cell-surface–associated MMP activity was measured using a fluorogenic peptide (DQ gelatin; Invitrogen). A total of 25,000 cells were plated in a 96-well plate. The plates were incubated at 37°C and fluorescence was measured. Samples were run in quintuplet. Western blot analysis. After adhesion of CMFDA-labeled SKOV3ip1 cells to the 3D culture, cells were sorted by FACS on a MoFlo (Dako Cytomation). This procedure separated labeled SKOV3ip1 from fibroblasts and mesothelial cells after their coculture (Figure (Figure1D).1 Quantitative real-time RT-PCR. After adhesion of CMFDA-labeled SKOV3ip1 cells to the 3D culture, cells were sorted by FACS in PBS. cDNA was synthesized after total RNA extraction using the Applied Biosystems cDNA archive kit. After RT, real-time PCR was performed using a Prism 7500 (Applied Biosystems), with predesigned and validated TaqMan probes for MMP-2, p53, GAPDH, and huGUS. The relative mRNA expression of MMP-2 or p53 was normalized to GAPDH and huGUS mRNA expression (Applied Biosystems). The reactions were run in triplicate using the following conditions: 1 cycle at 50°C for 2 minutes, followed by 10 minutes activation of the polymerase at 95°C. Subsequently, 40 cycles were performed at 95°C for 15 seconds and 60°C for 60 seconds. The median Ct value was determined, and data was expressed as fold change of relative mRNA expression using the comparative Ct method (53).
Transfections. SKOV3ip1 cells were transiently transfected with the full-length MMP-2 promoter (–1,659 bp or 5′-deletions (30) using SuperFect Transfection Reagent (QIAGEN). Eighteen hours after transfection, cells were trypsinized for adhesion assays, and the SKOV3ip1 cells (1.5 × 106 /well) were added on the 3D culture. After 4 hours cells were detached, lysed, and luciferase activity was analyzed (54).
Immunoprecipitation. Immunoprecipitation western blot analysis was performed on SKOV3ip1 cells that were bound to plastic or bound to 3D culture after FACs sorting as described (55).
Treatment studies. For the intervention study, SKOV3ip1 cells (1 × 106) were injected into the peritoneal cavity of nude mice. Fourteen days after injection, the control peptide (200 μg/injection/mouse) or MMPI (200 μg) was injected twice per week for 3 weeks (10 mice/group). For the prevention study, SKOV3ip1 cells (1 × 106), pretreated with control (PBS alone) or MMPI (10 μM), were injected i.p., and 28 days after injection the mice were sacrificed (10 mice/group). The number of tumor colonies was counted and the tumor was weighed (33). For the prevention survival study, SKOV3ip1 cells (1 × 106), pretreated for 18 hours with control peptide (10 μm) or MMPI (10 μm), were injected i.p. into female athymic nude mice (10 mice/group), and animals were sacrificed at the first signs of distress per institutional guidelines. For the intervention survival study, treatment was started after 14 days and continued 2 times per week for 3 weeks (10 mice/group).
Immunohistochemistry. Formalin-fixed tumors were stained with H&E, or immunohistochemistry was performed with antibodies against Ki67 (1:100), CD31 (1:50), and FN (soluble IST-3) (Sigma-Aldrich). MMP-2 cleavage of Vn and FN. Recombinant human MMP-2 (a kind gift of William Stetler-Stevenson, National Cancer Institute [NCI], Bethesda, Maryland, USA) was activated with APMA for 1 hour at 37°C. Full-length Vn or FN was cleaved by activated MMP-2 for 2 hours at 37°C. One hundred nanograms of MMP-2 and APMA-activated MMP-2 were analyzed by gelatin zymography. MMP-2 cleavage of FN were analyzed on a 10% Tris-HCl gel and silver stained. Statistics. Adhesion assays were performed in triplicate, and at least 3 independent experiments were conducted. Gelatinase assays were performed in quintuplet, and at least 3 independent experiments were conducted. The mean ± SD are reported. Significant changes were determined by 2-sided, unpaired t tests. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were calculated to determine significant changes in prevention survival study.
Acknowledgments We are grateful to Emily Kistner (University of Chicago) for help with the statistical analysis; Douglas Boyd (MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA) for the MMP-2 promoter constructs; Carl Maki (University of Chicago) for the p53 constructs; Anthony Montag (Department of Pathology, University of Chicago) for reading the immunohistochemical stainings; William Stetler-Stevenson for the human recombinant MMP-2; Gail Isenberg for critical review of the manuscript; Lidiya Korets (UCSF) for help with animal husbandry; and Alexandra Eichten (UCSF) for assistance with in vivo evaluation of RAG/MMP mice. E. Lengyel was supported by grants from the Gynecologic Cancer Foundation (2005-2006 GCF/Molly Cade Ovarian Cancer Research Grant), the Ovarian Cancer Research Fund (Liz Tilberis Scholars Program), and the NCI (R01 CA111882). H.A. Kenny was supported by a Penny Severns Breast, Cervical, and Ovarian Cancer Research postdoctoral fellowship from the Illinois Department of Public Health and a Graduate Training Program in Cancer Biology postdoctoral fellowship through the University of Chicago (NIH/NCI 5T32 CA09594). L.M. Coussens was supported by NIH grants CA72006, CA94168, and CA098075 and a Department of Defense Breast Cancer Research Program Era of Hope Scholar Award (BC051640).
Footnotes Nonstandard abbreviations used: APMA, aminophenylmercuric acetate; FACS, fluorescent-activated cell sorting; FN, fibronectin; HPF, human primary fibroblast; HPMC, human primary mesothelial cell; MMPI, MMP inhibitor; MT1, membrane-type 1; OvCa, ovarian cancer; Vn, vitronectin.
Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.
Citation for this article: J. Clin. Invest. 118:1367–1379 (2008). doi:10.1172/JCI33775
References 1. Cannistra S.A. Cancer of the ovary. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004;351:2519–2529. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra041842. [PubMed] 2. Doig T., Monaghan H. Sampling the omentum in ovarian neoplasia: when one block is enough. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer. 2006;16:36–40. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2006.00273.x. [PubMed] 3. Egeblad M., Werb Z. Νew functions for the matrix metalloproteinases in cancer progression. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2002;2:161–174. doi: 10.1038/nrc745. [PubMed] 4. Liotta L., Abe S., Robey P., Martin G. Preferential digestion of basement membrane collagen by an enzyme derived from a metastatic murine tumor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1979;76:2268–2272. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.5.2268. [PubMed] 5. Lakka S.S., et al. Synergistic down-regulation of urokinase plasminogen activator receptor and matrix metalloproteinase-9 in SNB19 glioblastoma cells efficiently inhibits glioma cell invasion, angiogenesis and tumor growth. Cancer Res. 2003;63:2454–2461. [PubMed] 6. Chantrain C.F., et al. Stromal matrix metalloproteinase-9 regulates the vascular architecture in neuroblastoma by promoting pericyte recruitment. Cancer Res. 2004;64:1675–1686. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-0160. [PubMed] 7. Bergers G., et al. Matrix metalloproteinase-9 triggers the angiogenic switch during carcinogenesis. Nat. Cell Biol. 2000;2:737–744. doi: 10.1038/35036374. [PubMed] 8. Bissett D., et al. Phase III study of matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor prinomastat in non-small-cell lung cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2005;23:842–849. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.170. [PubMed] 9. Bramhall S.R., Rosemurgy A., Brown P.D., Bowry C., Buckels J.A.C. Marimastat as first-line therapy for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer: a randomized trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 2001;19:3447–3455. [PubMed] 10. Bramhall S.R., et al. Marimastat as maintenance therapy for patients with advanced gastric cancer: a randomised trial. Br. J. Cancer. 2002;86:1864–1870. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600310. [PubMed] 11. Fletcher L. MMPI demise spotlights target choice. Nat. Biotechnol. 2000;18:1138–1139. doi: 10.1038/81111. [PubMed] 12. Coussens L., Fingleton B., Matrisian L.M. Matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors and cancer: trial and tribulations. Science. 2002;295:2387–2392. doi: 10.1126/science.1067100. [PubMed] 13. Davies B., Brown P.D., East N., Crimmin M.J., Balkwill F. A synthetic matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor decreases tumor burden and prolongs survival of mice bearing human ovarian carcinoma xenografts. Cancer Res. 1993;53:2087–2091. [PubMed] 14. Bergers G., Javaherian K., Lo K.-M., Folkman J., Hanahan D. Effects of angiogenesis inhibitors on multistage carcinogenesis in mice. Science. 1999;284:808–812. doi: 10.1126/science.284.5415.808. [PubMed] 15. Giavazzi R., et al. Batimastat, a synthetic inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinases, potentiates the antitumor activity of cisplatin in ovarian carcinoma xenografts. Clin. Cancer Res. 1998;4:985–992. [PubMed] 16. Watson S.A., et al. Inhibition of tumor growth by marimastat in a human xenograft model of gastric cancer: relationship with levels of circulating CEA. Br. J. Cancer. 1999;81:19–23. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690645. [PubMed] 17. Lengyel E., et al. Expression of latent matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9) predicts survival in advanced ovarian cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 2001;82:291–298. doi: 10.1006/gyno.2001.6243. [PubMed] 18. Schmalfeldt B., et al. Increased expression of matrix metalloproteinases (MMP)-2, MMP-9, and the urokinase-type plasminogen activator is associated with progression from benign to advanced ovarian cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2001;7:2396–2404. [PubMed] 19. Moser T.L., Pizzo S.V., Bafetti L., Fishman D.A., Stack M.S. Evidence for preferential adhesion of ovarian epithelial carcinoma cells to type I collagen mediated by the α2β1 integrin. Int. J. Cancer. 1996;67:695–701. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19960904)67:5<695::AID-IJC18>3.0.CO;2-4. [PubMed] 20. Kenny H.A., Krausz T., Yamada S.D., Lengyel E. Development of an organotypic peritoneal three-dimensional culture to study peritoneal attachment of ovarian cancer cells. Int. J. Cancer. 2007;121:1463–1472. doi: 10.1002/ijc.22874. [PubMed] 21. Westerlund A., Hujanen E., Puistola U., Turpeenniemi-Hujanen T. Fibroblasts stimulate human ovarian cancer cell invasion and expression of 72-kDa gelatinase A (MMP-2). Gynecol. Oncol. 1997;67:76–82. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1997.4808. [PubMed] 22. Koivunen E., et al. Tumor targeting with a selective gelatinase inhibitor. Nat. Biotechnol. 1999;17:768–774. doi: 10.1038/11703. [PubMed] 23. Hu B., et al. Angiopoietin-2 induces human glioma invasion through the activation of matrix metalloprotease-2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2003;100:8904–8909. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1533394100. [PubMed] 24. Ramos-DeSimone N., Moll U., Quigley J.P., French D.L. Inhibition of matrix metalloproteinase 9 activation by a specific monoclonal antibody. Hybridoma. 1993;12:349–363. [PubMed] 25. Tam E.M., Wu Y., Butler G., Stack S., Overall C. Collagen binding properties of the membrane type-1 matrix metalloproteinase (MT1-MMP) hemopexin C domain. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:39005–39014. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M206874200. [PubMed] 26. Coussens L., Tinkle C.L., Hanahan D., Werb Z. MMP-9 supplied by bone marrow-derived cells contributes to skin carcinogenesis. Cell. 2000;103:481–490. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00139-2. [PubMed] 27. Autio-Harmainen H., et al. Expression of 72 kilodalton type IV collagenase (gelatinase A) in benign and malignant ovarian tumors. Lab. Invest. 1993;69:312–321. [PubMed] 28. Itoh T., et al. Reduced angiogenesis and tumor progression in gelatinase A-deficient mice. Cancer Res. 1998;58:1048–1051. [PubMed] 29. Yan C., Wang H., Boyd D. ATF3 represses 72-kDa type IV collagenase (MMP-2) expression by antagonizing p53- dependent trans-activation of the collagenase promoter. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:10804–10812. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112069200. [PubMed] 30. Bian J., Sun Y. Transcriptional activation by p53 of the human type IV collagenase (gelatinase A or matrix metalloproteinase 2) promoter. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1997;17:6330–6338. [PubMed] 31. Modesitt S.C., et al. In vitro and in vivo adenovirus-mediated p53 and p16 tumor supressor therapy in ovarian cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2001;7:1765–1772. [PubMed] 32. Pletenpol J.A., et al. Sequence-specific transcriptional activation is essential for growth supression by p53. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1994;91:1998–2002. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.6.1998. [PubMed] 33. Sawada K., et al. C-Met overexpression is a prognostic factor in ovarian cancer and an effective target for inhibition of peritoneal dissemination and invasion. Cancer Res. 2007;67:1670–1680. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1147. [PubMed] 34. Carreiras F., et al. Migration properties of the human ovarian adenocarcinoma cell line IGROV1: importance of αvβ3 integrins and vitronectin. Int. J. Cancer. 1999;80:285–294. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19990118)80:2<285::AID-IJC19>3.0.CO;2-L. [PubMed] 35. Pierschbacher M.D., Hayman E.G., Ruoslahti E. The cell attachment determinant in fibronectin. J. Cell. Biochem. 1985;28:115–126. doi: 10.1002/jcb.240280205. [PubMed] 36. Cannistra S.A., Ottensmeier C., Niloff J., Orta B., DiCarlo J. Expression and function of β1 and αvβ3 integrins in ovarian cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 1995;58:216–225. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1995.1214. [PubMed] 37. Krüger A., et al. Antimetastatic activity of a novel mechanism-based gelatinase inhibitor. Cancer Res. 2005;65:3523–3526. [PubMed] 38. Boyd R., Balkwill F. MMP-2 release and activation in ovarian carcinoma: the role of fibroblasts. Br. J. Cancer. 1999;80:315–321. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690357. [PubMed] 39. Naylor M.S., Stamp G.W., Davies B.D., Balkwill F.R. Expression and activity of MMPs and their regulators in ovarian cancer. Int. J. Cancer. 1994;58:50–56. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910580110. [PubMed] 40. Vikhanskaya F., Erba E., D’Incalci M., Broggini M. Introduction of wild-type p53 in a human ovarian cancer cell line not expressing endogenous p53. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994;22:1012–1017. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.6.1012. [PubMed] 41. Brader K.R., et al. Adenovirus E1A expression enhances the sensitivity of an ovarian cancer cell line to multiple cytotoxic agents through an apoptotic mechanism. Clin. Cancer Res. 1997;3:2017–2024. [PubMed] 42. Yaginuma Y., Westphal H. Abnormal structure and expression of the p53 gene in human ovarian carcinoma cell lines. Cancer Res. 1992;52:4196–4199. [PubMed] 43. Hagiwara K., McMenamin M.G., Harris C.C. Mutational analysis of the p63/p73L/p51/p40/CUSP/Ket gene in human cancer cell lines using intronic primers. Cancer Res. 1999;59:4165–4169. [PubMed] 44. Giannelli G., et al. Induction of cell migration by matrix metalloprotease-2 cleavage of laminin-5. Science. 1997;277:225–228. doi: 10.1126/science.277.5323.225. [PubMed] 45. Wang H., et al. Tumor cell α3β1 integrin and vascular laminin-5 mediate pulmonary arrest and metastasis. J. Cell Biol. 2004;164:935–941. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200309112. [PubMed] 46. Huang S., et al. Contributions of stromal metalloproteinase-9 to angiogenesis and growth of human ovarian carcinoma in mice. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2002;94:1134–1142. [PubMed] 47. Coussens L., et al. Inflammatory mast cells upregulate angiogenesis during squamous epithelial carcinogenesis. Genes Dev. 1999;13:1382–1397. doi: 10.1101/gad.13.11.1382. [PubMed] 48. Vu T.H., et al. MMP-9/gelatinase B is a key regulator of growth plate angiogenesis and apoptosis of hypertrophic chondrocytes. Cell. 1998;93:411–422. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81169-1. [PubMed] 49. Mombaerts P., et al. RAG-1 deficient mice have no mature B and T lymphocytes. Cell. 1992;68:869–877. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90030-G. [PubMed] 50. Lounis H., et al. Primary cultures of normal and tumoral human ovarian epithelium: a powerful tool for basic molecular studies. Exp. Cell Res. 1994;215:303–309. doi: 10.1006/excr.1994.1346. [PubMed] 51. Lengyel E., et al. Induction of Mr 92,000 type IV collagenase expression in a squamous cell carcinoma cell line by fibroblasts. Cancer Res. 1995;55:963–967. [PubMed] 52. Ried S., et al. Activation mechanisms of the urokinase-type plasminogen activator promoter by hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor (HGF/SF). J. Biol. Chem. 1999;274:16377–16386. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.23.16377. [PubMed] 53. Pfaffl M., et al. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29:e45. [PubMed] 54. Hapke S., et al. β3A-integrin downregulates the urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (u-PAR) through a PEA3/ets transcriptional silencing element in the u-PAR promoter.
. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2001;21:2118–2132. doi: 10.1128/MCB.21.6.2118-2132.2001. [PubMed] 55. Nie L., Sasaki M., Maki C.G. Regulation of p53 nuclear export through sequential changes in conformation and ubiquitination. J. Biol. Chem. 2007;282:14616–14625. [PubMed] |
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||||
N Engl J Med. 2004 Dec 9; 351(24):2519-29.
[N Engl J Med. 2004]Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2006 Jan-Feb; 16(1):36-40.
[Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2006]Nat Rev Cancer. 2002 Mar; 2(3):161-74.
[Nat Rev Cancer. 2002]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 May; 76(5):2268-72.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979]Cancer Res. 2003 May 15; 63(10):2454-61.
[Cancer Res. 2003]Cancer Res. 2004 Mar 1; 64(5):1675-86.
[Cancer Res. 2004]Nat Cell Biol. 2000 Oct; 2(10):737-44.
[Nat Cell Biol. 2000]Nat Cell Biol. 2000 Oct; 2(10):737-44.
[Nat Cell Biol. 2000]Cancer Res. 1993 May 1; 53(9):2087-91.
[Cancer Res. 1993]Science. 1999 Apr 30; 284(5415):808-12.
[Science. 1999]Clin Cancer Res. 1998 Apr; 4(4):985-92.
[Clin Cancer Res. 1998]Br J Cancer. 1999 Sep; 81(1):19-23.
[Br J Cancer. 1999]Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2006 Jan-Feb; 16(1):36-40.
[Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2006]Int J Cancer. 1996 Sep 4; 67(5):695-701.
[Int J Cancer. 1996]Int J Cancer. 2007 Oct 1; 121(7):1463-72.
[Int J Cancer. 2007]Gynecol Oncol. 1997 Oct; 67(1):76-82.
[Gynecol Oncol. 1997]Nat Biotechnol. 1999 Aug; 17(8):768-74.
[Nat Biotechnol. 1999]Nat Rev Cancer. 2002 Mar; 2(3):161-74.
[Nat Rev Cancer. 2002]Int J Cancer. 2007 Oct 1; 121(7):1463-72.
[Int J Cancer. 2007]Nat Biotechnol. 1999 Aug; 17(8):768-74.
[Nat Biotechnol. 1999]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Jul 22; 100(15):8904-9.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003]Hybridoma. 1993 Aug; 12(4):349-63.
[Hybridoma. 1993]J Biol Chem. 2002 Oct 11; 277(41):39005-14.
[J Biol Chem. 2002]Cell. 2000 Oct 27; 103(3):481-90.
[Cell. 2000]Lab Invest. 1993 Sep; 69(3):312-21.
[Lab Invest. 1993]Cancer Res. 2004 Mar 1; 64(5):1675-86.
[Cancer Res. 2004]Cancer Res. 1998 Mar 1; 58(5):1048-51.
[Cancer Res. 1998]J Biol Chem. 2002 Mar 29; 277(13):10804-12.
[J Biol Chem. 2002]Mol Cell Biol. 1997 Nov; 17(11):6330-8.
[Mol Cell Biol. 1997]Clin Cancer Res. 2001 Jun; 7(6):1765-72.
[Clin Cancer Res. 2001]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Mar 15; 91(6):1998-2002.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994]Cancer Res. 2007 Feb 15; 67(4):1670-9.
[Cancer Res. 2007]Nat Rev Cancer. 2002 Mar; 2(3):161-74.
[Nat Rev Cancer. 2002]Int J Cancer. 1999 Jan 18; 80(2):285-94.
[Int J Cancer. 1999]J Cell Biochem. 1985; 28(2):115-26.
[J Cell Biochem. 1985]Gynecol Oncol. 1995 Aug; 58(2):216-25.
[Gynecol Oncol. 1995]Nat Biotechnol. 1999 Aug; 17(8):768-74.
[Nat Biotechnol. 1999]Cancer Res. 2005 May 1; 65(9):3523-6.
[Cancer Res. 2005]Gynecol Oncol. 1997 Oct; 67(1):76-82.
[Gynecol Oncol. 1997]Br J Cancer. 1999 May; 80(3-4):315-21.
[Br J Cancer. 1999]Lab Invest. 1993 Sep; 69(3):312-21.
[Lab Invest. 1993]Int J Cancer. 1994 Jul 1; 58(1):50-6.
[Int J Cancer. 1994]Clin Cancer Res. 2001 Jun; 7(6):1765-72.
[Clin Cancer Res. 2001]Nucleic Acids Res. 1994 Mar 25; 22(6):1012-7.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 1994]Clin Cancer Res. 1997 Nov; 3(11):2017-24.
[Clin Cancer Res. 1997]Cancer Res. 1992 Aug 1; 52(15):4196-9.
[Cancer Res. 1992]Cancer Res. 1999 Sep 1; 59(17):4165-9.
[Cancer Res. 1999]Science. 1997 Jul 11; 277(5323):225-8.
[Science. 1997]J Cell Biol. 2004 Mar 15; 164(6):935-41.
[J Cell Biol. 2004]J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002 Aug 7; 94(15):1134-42.
[J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002]Cell. 2000 Oct 27; 103(3):481-90.
[Cell. 2000]Genes Dev. 1999 Jun 1; 13(11):1382-97.
[Genes Dev. 1999]Nat Cell Biol. 2000 Oct; 2(10):737-44.
[Nat Cell Biol. 2000]Nat Biotechnol. 2000 Nov; 18(11):1138-9.
[Nat Biotechnol. 2000]J Clin Oncol. 2005 Feb 1; 23(4):842-9.
[J Clin Oncol. 2005]Br J Cancer. 2002 Jun 17; 86(12):1864-70.
[Br J Cancer. 2002]Cancer Res. 1998 Mar 1; 58(5):1048-51.
[Cancer Res. 1998]Cell. 1998 May 1; 93(3):411-22.
[Cell. 1998]Cancer Res. 2004 Mar 1; 64(5):1675-86.
[Cancer Res. 2004]Cell. 1992 Mar 6; 68(5):869-77.
[Cell. 1992]Exp Cell Res. 1994 Dec; 215(2):303-9.
[Exp Cell Res. 1994]Int J Cancer. 2007 Oct 1; 121(7):1463-72.
[Int J Cancer. 2007]Int J Cancer. 2007 Oct 1; 121(7):1463-72.
[Int J Cancer. 2007]Cancer Res. 2007 Feb 15; 67(4):1670-9.
[Cancer Res. 2007]J Cell Biochem. 1985; 28(2):115-26.
[J Cell Biochem. 1985]Cancer Res. 2007 Feb 15; 67(4):1670-9.
[Cancer Res. 2007]Cancer Res. 1995 Feb 15; 55(4):963-7.
[Cancer Res. 1995]J Biol Chem. 1999 Jun 4; 274(23):16377-86.
[J Biol Chem. 1999]Nucleic Acids Res. 2001 May 1; 29(9):e45.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 2001]Mol Cell Biol. 1997 Nov; 17(11):6330-8.
[Mol Cell Biol. 1997]Mol Cell Biol. 2001 Mar; 21(6):2118-32.
[Mol Cell Biol. 2001]J Biol Chem. 2007 May 11; 282(19):14616-25.
[J Biol Chem. 2007]Cancer Res. 2007 Feb 15; 67(4):1670-9.
[Cancer Res. 2007]