![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||
Copyright Hett et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. A Mycobacterial Enzyme Essential for Cell Division Synergizes with Resuscitation-Promoting Factor 1Department of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America 2Department of Medicine, VA Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America William Bishai, Editor Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, United States of America * E-mail: erubin/at/hsph.harvard.edu Conceived and designed the experiments: EH ER. Performed the experiments: EH MC. Analyzed the data: EH. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: EH MC LD ER. Wrote the paper: EH. Received October 11, 2007; Accepted January 16, 2008. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract The final stage of bacterial cell division requires the activity of one or more enzymes capable of degrading the layers of peptidoglycan connecting two recently developed daughter cells. Although this is a key step in cell division and is required by all peptidoglycan-containing bacteria, little is known about how these potentially lethal enzymes are regulated. It is likely that regulation is mediated, at least partly, through protein–protein interactions. Two lytic transglycosylases of mycobacteria, known as resuscitation-promoting factor B and E (RpfB and RpfE), have previously been shown to interact with the peptidoglycan-hydrolyzing endopeptidase, Rpf-interacting protein A (RipA). These proteins may form a complex at the septum of dividing bacteria. To investigate the function of this potential complex, we generated depletion strains in M. smegmatis. Here we show that, while depletion of rpfB has no effect on viability or morphology, ripA depletion results in a marked decrease in growth and formation of long, branched chains. These growth and morphological defects could be functionally complemented by the M. tuberculosis ripA orthologue (rv1477), but not by another ripA-like orthologue (rv1478). Depletion of ripA also resulted in increased susceptibility to the cell wall–targeting β-lactams. Furthermore, we demonstrate that RipA has hydrolytic activity towards several cell wall substrates and synergizes with RpfB. These data reveal the unusual essentiality of a peptidoglycan hydrolase and suggest a novel protein–protein interaction as one way of regulating its activity. Author Summary Mycobacteria, like all peptidoglycan-containing bacteria, must extend and cleave the surrounding structurally rigid layer of peptidoglycan to grow and divide. The peptidoglycan hydrolases responsible for this cleavage often have redundant functions, both revealing their importance and making them difficult to study. Furthermore, such hydrolases must be tightly regulated, due to their potentially lytic nature. We recently demonstrated the interaction between a lytic transglycosylase (Rpf) and an endopeptidase (RipA) at the septum of dividing bacteria. To investigate the role of these two hydrolases, we generated conditional mutants of each and were surprised to find that depletion of ripA resulted in long chains of cells. This phenotype was reversed upon induction of ripA, indicating that cell wall expansion and septum formation can be decoupled from the process of septum resolution. In addition, we present data showing that the combination of Rpf and RipA results in enhanced hydrolysis of peptidoglycan in an in vitro assay, suggesting protein–protein interactions as one potential mechanism of regulation. Introduction Though not formally considered virulence factors, genes required for bacterial cell division clearly are necessary for the growth, and thus, pathogenesis, of bacteria. The distinction between homeostatic and virulence genes is blurred when nonessential genes involved in vegetative cell division become essential under specific stressful conditions encountered inside a host. Such an example is seen with the resuscitation-promoting factors (Rpf) encoded by many different bacteria, including mycobacteria. These proteins are named for their ability to resuscitate nonreplicating dormant bacteria. The single Rpf-encoding gene in Micrococcus luteus [1] is essential, but as many as three of the five genes encoding RpfA-E can be deleted in Mycobacterium tuberculosis without markedly affecting in vitro growth. However, one single deletion (rpfB) and several of the triple combinations yielded strains unable to grow or divide in stressful conditions in vitro and in vivo [2],[3]. This suggests that certain potential cell division proteins that appear to play nonessential roles in homeostatic processes can become vital in conditions of stress. The vital processes of cell growth and division involve the temporal and spatial coordination of events such as peptidoglycan and cell wall extension, DNA replication, chromosomal partitioning, Z-ring assembly, septum formation, and cytokinesis. Much of the mechanism behind this coordination involves inhibiting and stabilizing proteins that regulate the eventual assembly of a Z-ring at the midcell of bacteria [4],[5]. This Z-ring consists primarily of a polymerized ring of tubulin-like FtsZ on the cytoplasmic side of the plasma membrane, stabilized by membrane-associated and integral membrane proteins. Assembly occurs in an ordered fashion that is not entirely linear, with some components assembling before joining the Z-ring [6],[7],[8]. Some of the last proteins to be recruited to the Z-ring are thought to be the peptidoglycan hydrolyzing enzymes, such as AmiC [9] and EnvC [10] in E. coli. These enzymes digest the peptidoglycan layers connecting two recently developed daughter cells in the final stage of cell division [11]. While crucial to cell division, the regulation of these potentially lethal enzymes is poorly understood. It is thought that protein-protein interactions play a role in regulating activity and localization [12]. Studying cell wall hydrolases has proven difficult due to the large number encoded in most bacterial genomes and the high degree of functional redundancy. For example, seven hydrolases can be deleted from a strain of E. coli without loss of viability [13]. Little is known about the hydrolases involved in mycobacterial cell division. CwlM and Rv2719c were both shown to be mycobacterial cell wall hydrolases [14],[15]. Two recently identified hydrolases, RpfB and RpfE, were shown to interact with rpf-interacting protein (RipA), a peptidoglycan endopeptidase [16]. Rpf proteins constitute a family of lytic transglycosylase enzymes capable of hydrolyzing the glycosidic bonds in the essential stress-bearing, shape-maintaining peptidoglycan layer [17]. RpfB has a structure similar to the E. coli soluble lytic transglycosylase 70 (Slt70) [18] and is known to hydrolyze the beta-1,4-glycosidic bond between N-acetyl muramic acid and N- acetyl glucosamine [19]. RipA has been shown to be a peptidoglycan hydrolase [16]. It is predicted to function as an L,D-endopeptidase, capable of hydrolyzing D-glutamyl-meso-diaminopimelic acid [20], two amino acids that are part of the crosslinking peptides vital for keeping peptidoglycan rigid and stable [21]. Both RpfB and RipA localize to the septa of dividing bacteria [16] and thus may play a role in the late stages of mycobacterial cell division, possibly during regrowth from a stressed state. Here we show that depletion of ripA in a strain of M. smegmatis results in a significant decrease in growth, formation of long, branched chains, and increased sensitivity to a cell wall–targeting antibiotic. These defects can be functionally complemented with the M. tuberculosis allele of ripA. We demonstrate that the peptidoglycan hydrolytic activity of RipA synergizes with RpfB. Thus, this protein is an unusual example of an essential peptidoglycan hydrolase whose activity may be partially regulated through protein-protein interactions. Results Depletion of RipA blocks normal cell division RipA interacts with RpfB, a lytic transglycosylase, and colocalizes at the septum [16]. We hypothesized that the RipA-RpfB complex may be involved in degrading peptidoglycan at the septum during cell division. To further investigate the function the individual components of this complex, we attempted to make deletion strains of ripA and rpfB in M. smegmatis. Though disruption of rpfB was successful, we were unable to disrupt the ripA gene in M. smegmatis. We have previously reported that the ripA gene in M. tuberculosis appears to be essential for in vitro growth [22], suggesting that it might also be essential in M. smegmatis. To test this possibility we constructed depletion strains of M. smegmatis in which ripA (MSMEG3153) or rpfB (MSMEG5439) are transcribed from an inducible tetracycline promoter (Ptet, Figure 1A
To further confirm the requirement of ripA for growth, we plated ripA-depletion or rpfB-depletion strains of M. smegmatis on plates containing a gradient of inducer. The ripA-depletion strain grew in a Tet-dependent manner, with the highest growth in the center corresponding to the highest concentration of inducer and no growth near the edges of the plate where inducer was the lowest, confirming the requirement of ripA for growth. Conversely, the rpfB-depletion strain grew similarly throughout the plate in a Tet-independent manner, indicating that rpfB is not required for growth under these conditions. Depletion of RipA results in abnormal morphology While rpfB depleted cells had normal morphology, ripA depleted cells had markedly abnormal shape (Figures 1C
Branches, not observed in wild-type cells, were seen in almost all ripA-depleted bacteria visualized (>95%). Interestingly, 91% (203/223) of the branches visualized originated directly adjacent to septa. M. tuberculosis ripA allele functionally complements M. smegmatis ripA The M. tuberculosis ripA gene encodes a 472 amino acid protein that has been shown to degrade peptidoglycan [23]. Its C-terminal 105 amino acids contain a putative endopeptidase domain, which has 40% identity with the Listeria monocytogenes p60 protein (Figure 3A
To identify the responsible gene we tested if the M. tuberculosis allele of ripA (ripA-mtb) was able to complement the M. smegmatis with diminished native ripA (ripA-smeg) production. We expressed ripA-mtb from a zeocin-marked episomal plasmid. A ripA-smeg depletion strain containing the ripA-mtb construct grew similarly to wildtype in the absence of inducer, while a strain carrying an empty plasmid formed chains when ripA-smeg was depleted (Figure 3C Depletion of RipA increases susceptibility to a cell wall–targeting antibiotic Because depletion of ripA may have a marked effect on cell wall structure, we reasoned that strains with diminished expression of ripA might have altered susceptibility to antibiotics that target the cell wall. To test this, we grew the M. Smegmatis regulated ripA strain in the presence of inducer, then washed and spread on plates containing various amounts of inducer (0, 10, 100 ng/ml Tet). A sterilized disc of Whatman paper was placed in the middle of the plate and 10 ul of a single antibiotic was added to the disc. After incubating for 3–4 days, the size of the zone of inhibition was measured (Figure 4
RipA degrades multiple cell wall substrates RipA has been predicted and shown to degrade M. luteus cell wall material [25],[26]. To test if RipA hydrolyzes peptidoglycan and cell wall material from other species of bacteria, we determined the enzymatic activity of RipA using a variety of FITC-labeled, cell wall–derived substrates. We expressed RipA as a fusion protein with GST in E. coli and purified the fusion protein using affinity chromatography. We found that GST-RipA, but not GST alone, was able to hydrolyze cell wall derived from M. smegmatis as well as peptidoglycan purified from Streptomyces, and had minimal activity against M. luteus cell wall (Figure 5B–D
The interaction of RipA and RpfB results in synergistic hydrolysis of peptidoglycan The predicted activity of RipA is to cleave the peptide cross-linkages in peptidoglycan and is distinct from Rpf, which is predicted to cleave glycosidic bonds in peptidoglycan (Figure 5A Using the same assays described above, we found that GST-RpfB alone had minimal ability to degrade cell wall extracts or purified peptidoglycan. However, when GST-RpfB was combined with GST-RipA, activity was more than the sum of individual enzyme activities. The same result was found with all substrates tested (Figure 5B–D Discussion In this work, we demonstrate that RipA is essential for normal cell division in M. smegmatis, with its depletion resulting in long, branched filaments and increased susceptibility to a specific cell wall targeting antibiotic. Furthermore, RipA cleaves peptidoglycan and synergizes with RpfB. Taken together, these data support a model where RipA is 1) required for the final stage of cell division, where daughter cells are separated and 2) has peptidoglycan hydrolytic activity that may be modulated by RpfB under certain conditions. It is unusual that RipA is essential for normal cell division in M. smegmatis and, apparently, M. tuberculosis [22]. Because bacteria encode a number of hydrolytic enzymes that are, at least in part, functionally redundant, strains carrying deletions of single hydrolase genes are generally viable, though combinations of mutations can result in lack of viability [13]. In M. smegmatis and M. tuberculosis, ripA does not appear to be redundant. Conversely, while M. marinum strains carrying mutations in the homologous gene, iipA, do have abnormal morphology, they are still able to divide. Mutations in the hydrolytic domain of IipA abolished complementation of the defect, confirming the importance of the hydrolytic activity of IipA [27]. In M. marinum, different rip paralogues might be able to complement for loss of iipA. None of the rpf genes appears to be essential in M. tuberculosis and combinations of at least three rpf genes can be deleted in M. tuberculosis strains while still maintaining normal in vitro vegetative growth [2]. We demonstrate that RpfB is also not essential in M. smegmatis. It logically follows that the interaction between RpfB and RipA must not be essential for RipA function during vegetative growth. Of course, it is possible that another Rpf protein is able to compensate for the absence of RpfB, resulting in increased RipA-dependent activity. For example, RpfE is able to interact with RipA [16]. It is also possible that the RipA-RpfB interaction, and subsequent enhanced hydrolytic activity, is required only under special circumstances, such as growth under specific conditions of stress. As noted, RpfB is required for resuscitation of M. tuberculosis in a reactivation mouse model [3]. Likewise, deletion of several combinations of three rpf genes results in viable bacteria that are unable to resuscitate from in vitro and in vivo resuscitation assays [2]. Thus, the RipA-RpfB interaction may be necessary under certain conditions. There are several models that might explain the cooperativity seen between RipA and RpfB. One protein might allosterically activate the other, resulting in increased peptidoglycan degradation. Alternatively, both proteins might be fully active, but their association might bring their active sites in close proximity, thus producing cleavage of bonds located near to one another in the peptidoglycan. Since peptidoglycan is a highly cross-linked polymer, nearby cleavages are more likely to effectively degrade peptidoglycan and release fragments. Several of the most effective antibiotics, including many important antimycobacterial agents, target cell wall synthesis. RipA appears to represent a particular vulnerability for M. tuberculosis. In addition to its possible role in reactivation through interaction with Rpf, RipA is essential for normal cell division and is accessible to drugs, given its external localization. Inhibiting the enzymatic activity should block the ability of daughter cells to separate from one another, while blocking protein-protein interactions could result in dysregulation of activity. Thus, RipA is an attractive target for antimycobacterial drug development. Materials and Methods Strains and culture conditions E. coli XL-1 (Stratagene) strains were used for cloning and E. coli BL21 (DE3) (Stratagene) was used for expression of recombinant proteins from the pET41a (Novagen) or pMal (NEB). Mycobacterium smegmatis (mc2155) and Mycobacterium tuberculosis (H37Rv) strains were grown at 37°C in Middlebrook 7H9 broth supplemented with ADC and Tween80 and antibiotic when appropriate. Recombinant protein production The E. coli expression strain, BL21(DE3) was used to synthesize each protein following the Novagen manual protocol. Protein concentrations were measured using the Bradford assay, normalized, and confirmed by coomassie-stained polyacrylamide gels. Western blotting Protein samples were combined with 4× Laemmli's SDS PAGE buffer and boiled at 100°C for 10 minutes. Proteins were separated on 10% Tris-tricine polyacrylamide gels by electrophoresis, transferred to nitrocellulose, and probed with specific antibodies using standard techniques. Preparation and FITC-labeling of cell wall material M. smegmatis cell wall was prepared as previously described [14]. Streptomyces peptidoglycan and lyophilized M. luteus cell wall were both obtained from Sigma. The fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled bacterial cell wall was prepared by covalently linking FITC to amine groups in the cell wall. 10 mg FITC (Molecular Probes) was used to label 10 mg of insoluble peptidoglycan or cell wall material following the protocol from Molecular Probes. Enzyme assay Recombinant M. tuberculosis proteins were incubated with several FITC-labeled cell wall substrates and assayed for activity by measuring FITC release. 25 µg of Rpf or RipA alone or 25 µg of Rpf and 25 µg RipA combined, were added to 25 µl of 2 mg/ml substrate and 25 µl 4× reaction buffer (50 mM Tris, 10 mM MgCl, 50 mM KCl, 2 mM MnCl, 0.01% Chaps, 100 mM KH2PO4, pH 5.75). The final volume was brought to 100 µl with H2O. As a control, 50 µg of lysozyme was added to M. smegmatis cell wall. Similar combinations with GST were also tested. GST alone, as well as buffer alone, were used to determine background release of FITC. After incubating at 30°C with enzyme and buffer for 3–5 days, the insoluble substrate was centrifuged (18,000×g) and soluble FITC was measured with filters for excitation 485 nm and emission 538 nm. Generation of depletion strains Depletion strains were generated as previously described [28]. Briefly, M. smegmatis, with the tetracycline repressor gene integrated into the attB site, was transformed with a suicide vector containing the first 600 nucleotides of M. smegmatis ripA gene under control of the tetracycline operator/promoter system (Ptet). Transformants were selected for hygromycin resistance. Appropriate recombination was confirmed using forward primers to Ptet and Prip (native ripA promoter) paired with a reverse primer to the 3′ end of ripA. The presence of a product of appropriate size for the former and lacking in the latter, confirmed the desired strain. Attempts to disrupt the ripA gene in M. smegmatis using a nonreplicating suicide vector designed to recombine into the middle of the gene were unsuccessful (though control knockouts, such as rpfB, were successful). Depletion strain growth and complementation The ripA and rpfB depletion strains were initially grown in 7H9 media containing kanamycin (selecting for TetR) and hygromycin (selecting for inserted pTet) as well as anhydrotetracycline (Tet). Once cultures reached late log-phase or stationary phase, they were centrifuged (2500×g for 5 minutes), washed once with PBS, and resuspended in media with varying amounts of Tet. To test recovery of ripA depleted cells, Tet was either added directly to cultures grown without Tet or to fresh media inoculated with cells depleted of ripA. To test complementation, the ripA gene and its native promoter from M. tuberculosis was amplified and cloned into an episomal plasmid containing the zeocin gene as a marker. This construct, or the isogenic empty vector, was transformed into the ripA depletion strain of M. smegmatis. Strains were grown in the presence of tetracycline inducer, washed and inoculated into media lacking inducer. Cultures were monitored by OD600 and microscopy. To confirm the essentiality of ripA, depletion strains of M. smegmatis were grown on a plate with a gradient of inducer generated by placing 10 µl of 10 ng/ml Tet on a paper disc in the center of the plate, resulting in a concentration of inducer highest at the middle of the plate and lowest at the edges. Susceptibility to antibiotics assay The ripA depletion strain of M. smegmatis was spread on LB agar plates containing different amounts of anhydrotetracycline inducer (ng/ml concentrations) to regulate the amount of ripA expressed. A filter disc with 10 µl of carbenicillin (100 mg/ml), isoniazid (10 mg/ml), or cycloserine (100 mg/ml) was placed in the center of plate and the diameter of inhibition of growth was measured after 4 days of growth. Microscopy and imaging M. smegmatis strains were centrifuged at 2500×g for 2 minutes, washed with 1ml PBS, and resuspended in 20 µl of PBS containing 50 nM TMA-DPH or 5 µM SYTO 9 for staining membranes or DNA, respectively. Samples were imaged with a Nikon TE-200 100× (NA 1.4) objective and captured with an Orca-II ER cooled CCD camera (Hamamatsu). Final images were prepared using Adobe Photoshop 7.0. Acknowledgments We are grateful to Sabine Ehrt for the pTetR and pTetO plasmids; Sunita Patel, Joseph Italiano, and David Rudner for assistance with microscopy; Marcia Goldberg, David Rudner, Chris Sassetti, Robert Husson, and Simon Dove for review of the manuscript; and Rubin lab members for insightful discussions. Footnotes The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. This work was supported by the Burroughs Wellcome Fund and the National Institutes of Health grants R01 AI51929, R01 AI48704, and P01 AI56296 (EJR). References 1. Mukamolova GV, Turapov OA, Kazarian K, Telkov M, Kaprelyants AS, et al. The rpf gene of Micrococcus luteus encodes an essential secreted growth factor. Mol Microbiol. 2002;46:611–621. [PubMed] 2. Downing KJ, Mischenko VV, Shleeva MO, Young DI, Young M, et al. Mutants of Mycobacterium tuberculosis lacking three of the five rpf-like genes are defective for growth in vivo and for resuscitation in vitro. Infect Immun. 2005;73:3038–3043. [PubMed] 3. Tufariello JM, Mi K, Xu J, Manabe YC, Kesavan AK, et al. Deletion of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis resuscitation-promoting factor Rv1009 gene results in delayed reactivation from chronic tuberculosis. Infect Immun. 2006;74:2985–2995. [PubMed] 4. Errington J, Daniel RA, Scheffers DJ. Cytokinesis in bacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2003;67:52–65. table of contents. [PubMed] 5. Vicente M, Rico AI, Martinez-Arteaga R, Mingorance J. Septum enlightenment: assembly of bacterial division proteins. J Bacteriol. 2006;188:19–27. [PubMed] 6. Goehring NW, Beckwith J. Diverse paths to midcell: assembly of the bacterial cell division machinery. Curr Biol. 2005;15:R514–526. [PubMed] 7. Goehring NW, Gonzalez MD, Beckwith J. Premature targeting of cell division proteins to midcell reveals hierarchies of protein interactions involved in divisome assembly. Mol Microbiol. 2006;61:33–45. [PubMed] 8. Goehring NW, Gueiros-Filho F, Beckwith J. Premature targeting of a cell division protein to midcell allows dissection of divisome assembly in Escherichia coli. Genes Dev. 2005;19:127–137. [PubMed] 9. Bernhardt TG, de Boer PA. The Escherichia coli amidase AmiC is a periplasmic septal ring component exported via the twin-arginine transport pathway. Mol Microbiol. 2003;48:1171–1182. [PubMed] 10. Bernhardt TG, de Boer PA. Screening for synthetic lethal mutants in Escherichia coli and identification of EnvC (YibP) as a periplasmic septal ring factor with murein hydrolase activity. Mol Microbiol. 2004;52:1255–1269. [PubMed] 11. Priyadarshini R, Popham DL, Young KD. Daughter cell separation by penicillin-binding proteins and peptidoglycan amidases in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 2006;188:5345–5355. [PubMed] 12. Romeis T, Holtje JV. Specific interaction of penicillin-binding proteins 3 and 7/8 with soluble lytic transglycosylase in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:21603–21607. [PubMed] 13. Heidrich C, Ursinus A, Berger J, Schwarz H, Holtje JV. Effects of multiple deletions of murein hydrolases on viability, septum cleavage, and sensitivity to large toxic molecules in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 2002;184:6093–6099. [PubMed] 14. Deng LL, Humphries DE, Arbeit RD, Carlton LE, Smole SC, et al. Identification of a novel peptidoglycan hydrolase CwlM in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005;1747:57–66. [PubMed] 15. Chauhan A, Lofton H, Maloney E, Moore J, Fol M, et al. Interference of Mycobacterium tuberculosis cell division by Rv2719c, a cell wall hydrolase. Mol Microbiol. 2006;62:132–147. [PubMed] 16. Hett EC, Chao MC, Steyn AJ, Fortune SM, Deng LL, et al. A partner for the resuscitation-promoting factors of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Mol Microbiol. 2007;66:658–668. [PubMed] 17. Mukamolova GV, Murzin AG, Salina EG, Demina GR, Kell DB, et al. Muralytic activity of Micrococcus luteus Rpf and its relationship to physiological activity in promoting bacterial growth and resuscitation. Mol Microbiol. 2006;59:84–98. [PubMed] 18. Cohen-Gonsaud M, Barthe P, Bagneris C, Henderson B, Ward J, et al. The structure of a resuscitation-promoting factor domain from Mycobacterium tuberculosis shows homology to lysozymes. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2005;12:270–273. [PubMed] 19. van Asselt EJ, Thunnissen AM, Dijkstra BW. High resolution crystal structures of the Escherichia coli lytic transglycosylase Slt70 and its complex with a peptidoglycan fragment. J Mol Biol. 1999;291:877–898. [PubMed] 20. Boneca IG. The role of peptidoglycan in pathogenesis. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2005;8:46–53. [PubMed] 21. Brennan PJ. Structure, function, and biogenesis of the cell wall of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2003;83:91–97. [PubMed] 22. Sassetti CM, Boyd DH, Rubin EJ. Genes required for mycobacterial growth defined by high density mutagenesis. Mol Microbiol. 2003;48:77–84. [PubMed] 23. Hett EC, Chao MC, Steyn AJ, Fortune SM, Deng LL, et al. A partner for the resuscitation-promoting factors of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Mol Microbiol. 2007 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05945.x. 24. Lenz LL, Mohammadi S, Geissler A, Portnoy DA. SecA2-dependent secretion of autolytic enzymes promotes Listeria monocytogenes pathogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:12432–12437. [PubMed] 25. Pilgrim S, Kolb-Maurer A, Gentschev I, Goebel W, Kuhn M. Deletion of the gene encoding p60 in Listeria monocytogenes leads to abnormal cell division and loss of actin-based motility. Infect Immun. 2003;71:3473–3484. [PubMed] 26. Anantharaman V, Aravind L. Evolutionary history, structural features and biochemical diversity of the NlpC/P60 superfamily of enzymes. Genome Biol. 2003;4:R11. [PubMed] 27. Gao LY, Pak M, Kish R, Kajihara K, Brown EJ. A mycobacterial operon essential for virulence in vivo and invasion and intracellular persistence in macrophages. Infect Immun. 2006;74:1757–1767. [PubMed] 28. Ehrt S, Guo XV, Hickey CM, Ryou M, Monteleone M, et al. Controlling gene expression in mycobacteria with anhydrotetracycline and Tet repressor. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:e21. [PubMed] |
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||
Mol Microbiol. 2002 Nov; 46(3):611-21.
[Mol Microbiol. 2002]Infect Immun. 2005 May; 73(5):3038-43.
[Infect Immun. 2005]Infect Immun. 2006 May; 74(5):2985-95.
[Infect Immun. 2006]Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2003 Mar; 67(1):52-65, table of contents.
[Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2003]J Bacteriol. 2006 Jan; 188(1):19-27.
[J Bacteriol. 2006]Curr Biol. 2005 Jul 12; 15(13):R514-26.
[Curr Biol. 2005]Mol Microbiol. 2006 Jul; 61(1):33-45.
[Mol Microbiol. 2006]Genes Dev. 2005 Jan 1; 19(1):127-37.
[Genes Dev. 2005]Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005 Feb 14; 1747(1):57-66.
[Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005]Mol Microbiol. 2006 Oct; 62(1):132-47.
[Mol Microbiol. 2006]Mol Microbiol. 2007 Nov; 66(3):658-68.
[Mol Microbiol. 2007]Mol Microbiol. 2006 Jan; 59(1):84-98.
[Mol Microbiol. 2006]Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2005 Mar; 12(3):270-3.
[Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2005]Mol Microbiol. 2007 Nov; 66(3):658-68.
[Mol Microbiol. 2007]Mol Microbiol. 2003 Apr; 48(1):77-84.
[Mol Microbiol. 2003]Nucleic Acids Res. 2005 Feb 1; 33(2):e21.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 2005]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Oct 14; 100(21):12432-7.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003]Infect Immun. 2003 Jun; 71(6):3473-84.
[Infect Immun. 2003]Infect Immun. 2003 Jun; 71(6):3473-84.
[Infect Immun. 2003]Genome Biol. 2003; 4(2):R11.
[Genome Biol. 2003]Mol Microbiol. 2003 Apr; 48(1):77-84.
[Mol Microbiol. 2003]J Bacteriol. 2002 Nov; 184(22):6093-9.
[J Bacteriol. 2002]Infect Immun. 2006 Mar; 74(3):1757-67.
[Infect Immun. 2006]Infect Immun. 2005 May; 73(5):3038-43.
[Infect Immun. 2005]Mol Microbiol. 2007 Nov; 66(3):658-68.
[Mol Microbiol. 2007]Infect Immun. 2006 May; 74(5):2985-95.
[Infect Immun. 2006]Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005 Feb 14; 1747(1):57-66.
[Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005]Nucleic Acids Res. 2005 Feb 1; 33(2):e21.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 2005]