• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of plosonePLoS OneView this ArticleSubmit to PLoSGet E-mail AlertsContact UsPublic Library of Science (PLoS)
PLoS ONE. 2008; 3(3): e1791.
Published online Mar 12, 2008. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0001791
PMCID: PMC2262149

Transcriptomic Analyses Reveal Novel Genes with Sexually Dimorphic Expression in the Zebrafish Gonad and Brain

Geraldine Butler, Academic Editor

Abstract

Background

Our knowledge on zebrafish reproduction is very limited. We generated a gonad-derived cDNA microarray from zebrafish and used it to analyze large-scale gene expression profiles in adult gonads and other organs.

Methodology/Principal Findings

We have identified 116638 gonad-derived zebrafish expressed sequence tags (ESTs), 21% of which were isolated in our lab. Following in silico normalization, we constructed a gonad-derived microarray comprising 6370 unique, full-length cDNAs from differentiating and adult gonads. Labeled targets from adult gonad, brain, kidney and ‘rest-of-body’ from both sexes were hybridized onto the microarray. Our analyses revealed 1366, 881 and 656 differentially expressed transcripts (34.7% novel) that showed highest expression in ovary, testis and both gonads respectively. Hierarchical clustering showed correlation of the two gonadal transcriptomes and their similarities to those of the brains. In addition, we have identified 276 genes showing sexually dimorphic expression both between the brains and between the gonads. By in situ hybridization, we showed that the gonadal transcripts with the strongest array signal intensities were germline-expressed. We found that five members of the GTP-binding septin gene family, from which only one member (septin 4) has previously been implicated in reproduction in mice, were all strongly expressed in the gonads.

Conclusions/Significance

We have generated a gonad-derived zebrafish cDNA microarray and demonstrated its usefulness in identifying genes with sexually dimorphic co-expression in both the gonads and the brains. We have also provided the first evidence of large-scale differential gene expression between female and male brains of a teleost. Our microarray would be useful for studying gonad development, differentiation and function not only in zebrafish but also in related teleosts via cross-species hybridizations. Since several genes have been shown to play similar roles in gonadogenesis in zebrafish and other vertebrates, our array may even provide information on genetic disorders affecting gonadal phenotypes and fertility in mammals.

Introduction

Zebrafish (Danio rerio) has become a major vertebrate model for developmental biology and genetics [1], genomics [2], [3] and human diseases [4][6] during the last three decades. Despite these advances, little is known about the molecular aspects of its reproduction. The molecular mechanisms underlying gonad development and function in zebrafish have yet to be elucidated.

Gonad differentiation in zebrafish is a highly complex process involving a ‘juvenile ovary-to-testis’ transformation [7][9]. At 15–20 days post fertilization (dpf), every zebrafish individual develops an ovary-like gonad (‘juvenile ovary’). The juvenile ovary continues to develop until maturation in the females while in the rest of the individuals it undergoes a transitional intersexual phase eventually leading to the formation of a differentiated testis [7], [10]. This process is further complicated by the high variability of the starting point and extent of the transformation process in different individuals [9]. Although the molecular mechanism of gonad differentiation is largely unknown, the products of several genes, including aromatase (cyp19a1; [11], Fushi tarazu factor-1d (ff1d; [12], [13]), anti-Müllerian hormone (amh; [14], [15]), and 11β-hydroxylase (cyp11b; [15]) have been implicated in this process.

Besides the gonads, the brain is also involved in vertebrate reproduction. The involvement of the brain in gonad development has been established by studies on quail which showed that males transplanted with female forebrains had abnormally developed testes, indicating that a genetically male brain is necessary for normal testis development [16]. Since sex change in some teleosts can be influenced by social control [17], [18], it is likely that events in the brain may determine the fate of the gonads, as suggested earlier by Francis [19]. Vertebrate reproduction and in part, sexual development, is largely controlled by feedback interactions in the brain-pituitary-gonadal (BPG) axis [19], [20]. Contrary to the dogma in mammals and birds that brain sexual dimorphism is entirely a result of hormonal action from the gonads, it has now been proven that the brain also develops differently in the two sexes as a result of differential brain gene expression, remarkably even before the gonads are formed [21][23].

Microarray-based approaches have been used to identify genes involved in gonad development and function in several organisms. In Caenorhabditis elegans, sex-regulated genes have been identified by characterizing gene expression differences between males and hermaphrodites using DNA microarrays [24], while in Drosophila melanogaster, microarray analysis has been performed to obtain the gene expression profile of the testis [25]. In rainbow trout, precocious ovaries were compared against normal ones using ovary-specific microarrays to reveal genes which are potentially involved in ovary maturation and development [26]. Extensive array-based studies have also been performed to elucidate gonad development and function in mice. These include gene expression profiling in differentiating male and female embryonic gonads [27], microarray analyses to identify genes involved in ovary development [28] and time course profiling of testicular gene expression during spermatogenesis [29].

In contrast to the extensive studies performed on other organisms, there has been little information available regarding the gonad transcriptomes of zebrafish. Currently available zebrafish microarrays include at least seven commercial whole genome oligo arrays, a heart and skeletal muscle-derived cDNA array [30], a microarray derived from mixed tissues of 4-month-old to adult zebrafish [31], an array containing brain-specific cDNAs [32] and a microarray spanning promoter regions of over 11,000 genes [33].

In order to identify and characterize genes potentially involved in gonad development and function, we constructed a microarray comprising nearly 6,400 unique cDNAs from zebrafish gonads. In our previous work, we analyzed a smaller subset of this collection by hybridizing adult ovary-, testis- and kidney-derived labeled targets to a membrane-based cDNA macroarray containing 2760 adult gonad cDNAs [34]. In the current experiment, we extended the throughput of the study by adding 3634 clones (derived mostly from the differentiating gonad) to the array and switching to a slide-based platform. In order to analyze the transcriptomes of the adult gonads and to compare them with those of other organs, RNA from adult ovary and testis were used as targets for hybridization onto the microarray, while RNA from the brain, kidney and rest of the body from both male and female adult zebrafish were used as controls. Our analysis revealed that a large number of genes showed sexually dimorphic expression in the gonads and other organs of adult zebrafish. These included novel transcripts which have not been characterized in any other vertebrate species according to our knowledge.

Results and Discussion

Extension of the gonadal EST set and generation of the Gonad Uniclone Microarray

We generated 4613 new ESTs from the adult zebrafish testis and ovary and 11010 sequences from the differentiating gonad [3, 4 and 5 weeks post-fertilization (wpf)], which has never been sampled before by others (refer to Table S1 for details). In total, 15623 new zebrafish ESTs have been submitted to GenBank from the effort described in this study.

In order to minimize redundancy, we performed in silico normalization of the above clone set by clustering their sequences together with our clone set published earlier [34], gonad-derived zebrafish ESTs from GenBank and gonadal zebrafish sequences from RefSeq (see Methods for details). Clustering of these sequences resulted in 11320 clusters and 21520 singletons (Fig. 1). Out of these, 542 clusters (representing 1893 ESTs) and 6325 singletons that were isolated by us have not been previously described from the zebrafish gonad by others. When we BLAST-searched our transcripts against GenBank at the nucleotide level (July 2007), 2018 transcripts did not hit any coding regions of the zebrafish genome. Out of these, 90 of them could be translated into peptides, 24 of which contained domains categorized by Gene Ontologies [35] (Table S2). Of the 2018 transcripts, 365 did not find any significant sequence identity to zebrafish ESTs, indicating that they are likely to be absent from commercial zebrafish microarrays. Of the 365 transcripts, 185 did not have hits to any characterized genes in GenBank. Therefore, these sequences represent entirely new zebrafish or vertebrate ESTs, justifying our extension of gene discovery efforts to developmental stages that have not been sampled previously.

Figure 1
Venn diagram depicting the clones used for in silico normalization for the generation of the Gonad Uniclone Microarray.

From the clustered dataset, we selected full-length cDNA clones representing 6370 unique clusters/singletons to form an extended, in silico-normalized cDNA collection, PCR-amplified inserts of which were used to generate our Gonad Uniclone Microarray. All inserts were sequenced from the 5′ end (refer to Table S1 for GenBank IDs) and over 90% of them (5750 clones) from the 3′ end, providing full-length sequences for 3582 clones (GenBank IDs: EX153972-EX159719, EX159734-EX159735).

The expression profiles of several candidate genes on the Gonad Uniclone Microarray were consistent with previous reports

We performed a total of 32 hybridizations, using eight target organs with four biological replicates each, with the aim of identifying differentially expressed genes in the gonads and other organs, and to set up a biological reference for future hybridizations involving differentiating gonads. The target organs consisted of adult ovary and testis; the brain, kidney and ‘rest-of-body’ (ie. whole body except the three organs listed earlier) from both male and female zebrafish, were used as controls. For simplicity, ‘rest of body’ was regarded as an organ in this publication. All targets were hybridized against a pooled common reference consisting of equal amounts of targets from all dissected organs from a single adult male and a single adult female.

In order to validate our data, duplicate clones of 24 candidate genes, most of which were known to be involved in gonad development and/or function in zebrafish and/or other organisms, were also included in the microarray. We observed a good similarity between expression profiles of the duplicate clones of each candidate gene. Following a 1-way ANOVA test and a Student-Newman-Keuls post hoc test, 18 of the 24 genes showed statistically significant differences between the eight organs. Of the 18 genes, 11 showed at least 1.5-fold higher expression in comparison to the common reference target in either of the gonads. These 11 included four and seven genes most highly expressed in the ovary and testis respectively. Although some of the remaining candidate genes showed enhanced expression in the gonads, they were excluded from analysis for the following reasons: they were expressed more strongly in other organs compared to the gonads, they had inconsistent replicate readings, they fell below the 1.5-fold cutoff or they did not show differential expression between the gonads. In addition, the inability of cDNA microarrays to distinguish between splice isoforms or similar transcripts produced from paralogous loci may also have resulted in lack of the expected differential expression for some of the candidate genes. A summary of the expression pattern observed for each of the 24 candidate genes is described in Table 1 and Table S3. Figure S1 depicts the expression profiles of three selected candidate genes described below.

Table 1
The list of the 24 candidate genes on the Gonad Uniclone Microarray, with their expression patterns indicated*.

Our array data revealed that the candidate gene zona pellucida glycoprotein 2 (zp2; [36]) showed specific expression in the adult zebrafish ovary (81-fold higher expression compared to the common reference target; all subsequent fold values in this publication are in comparison to the common reference target). Zp2 is an egg envelope protein which functions as a secondary sperm receptor during fertilization in mice [37]. Our observations are consistent with previous studies which have also reported ovary-specific expression of zp2 in zebrafish and mammals [36][38].

Another candidate gene, anti-Müllerian hormone (amh; for reviews see e.g. [39][42]), showed a 5.4-fold and 1.2-fold hybridization intensity in the testis and ovary respectively. This is consistent with recent reports indicating higher expression of amh in the zebrafish testis compared to the ovary [12], [14], [15], [43]. Similarly, in rat, calf and human, AMH is expressed primarily in fetal testicular tissue [44]. Its functions include regression of the Müllerian duct to suppress the formation of the female reproductive tract in males [45], and the regulation of gonadal steroidogenesis to promote testosterone synthesis [46].

Recently, a gene called fushi tarazu factor 1d (ftz-f1d or ff1d) has been suggested to be a candidate for sex determination and differentiation in zebrafish [12]. ff1d is one of the four zebrafish homologs of Steroidogenic Factor-1 (SF-1), a gene implicated in mammalian sex determination and differentiation [12], [47]. Our results revealed that ff1d showed an 8.3-fold and 1.4-fold expression level in the testis and ovary respectively. These results are consistent with RT-PCRs performed by [12] which showed that ff1d expresses in both gonads of zebrafish, albeit more strongly in the testis.

The positive results obtained from the expression profiles of the 11 candidate genes have enabled us to validate the experimental data obtained from our array, hence reinforcing its reliability. The comparison of candidate gene expression patterns across different organisms will also enable us to broaden our understanding of vertebrate sex determination and differentiation.

The Gonad Uniclone Microarray reveals many genes with sexually dimorphic expression in the gonads of zebrafish

A 1-way ANOVA parametric test revealed 6302 genes that showed statistically significant differences in their expression levels across the eight organs. These genes were subjected to a Student-Newman-Keuls post hoc test to reveal 1366 and 881 transcripts that showed at least 1.5-fold expression level in the adult ovary (Fig. S2) or testis (Fig. S3) respectively. Such genes will be referred to as genes with ‘ovary-’ or ‘testis-enhanced’ expression. While the expression of some genes appeared to be enhanced in one of the gonads, some showed high expression in both: there were 656 transcripts with levels of at least 1.5-fold in both gonads. A list of selected genes that were highly expressed in the gonads, together with their normalized intensities, is shown in Table 2 (full gene lists with Genbank IDs are shown in Tables S4, S5, S6 under ‘Supporting Information’).

Table 2
Selected genes showing >1.5-fold higher expression than the common reference in adult zebrafish gonads (normalized intensities for the gonads, and the range of the normalized intensities for the remaining organs are indicated).

Of the 881 ‘testis-enhanced’ genes, 346 showed lower expression levels in the ovary, increasing their differential expression level further between the two gonads. Similarly, 338 of the 1366 ‘ovary-enhanced’ genes showed lower expression level in the testis. Interestingly, many of these genes also appeared to be expressed at a lower level in all the other organs (Fig. S2A). In contrast, the 346 ‘testis-enhanced’ genes showed considerably lower levels in the ovary than in the other organs (Fig. S3C, F and I). Therefore, a higher proportion of genes expressed in the testis, as opposed to those expressed in the ovary, are co-expressed in other organs.

Genes with the most abundant transcripts in the gonad are expressed in the germline

In order to validate the expression patterns of genes obtained from the microarray, we performed in situ hybridizations (ISH) of 16 different transcripts on adult ovary or testis sections. We selected six ovary- and ten testis-enhanced genes on the basis of our microarray data (Table S7).

ISH results showed the expected expression in the gonad for five of the six ovary-expressed genes and eight of the ten testis-expressed genes analyzed (see Table S7), indicating an 81.3% concurrence with our array data. Images of ISH signals in gonad sections for five ovary- and five testis-expressed genes, together with their expression profiles from the microarray, are shown in Fig. 2. Nine of the ten genes shown had a positive correlation of ISH signal intensities with their corresponding gene expression levels as reflected from our array data (Fig. 2; Table S7), hence reinforcing the validity of our hybridization results. Four genes with unknown functions that showed ovary- or testis-enhanced expression were defined in our study as gez1-gez4 (‘gez’: gonad-expressed in zebrafish; see Fig. 2D, Fig. 2F and Table S7).

Figure 2
In situ hybridization revealed expression in the germline for ovary- and testis-enhanced genes.

All five ovary-enhanced genes with positive signal detected by ISH showed oocyte-specific expression pattern (Fig. 2A–E). Expression was strongest in Stage I and II oocytes, while only some Stage III oocytes showed strong staining. It is likely that expression of these genes is stage-specific and that they are involved in early oogenesis, as shown by their strong expression in earlier stages. Our observation is substantiated by previous studies which showed that zp2 expression in zebrafish (shown in Fig. 2A) is restricted to developing and not mature oocytes [38], [48]. Similarly, all eight testis-enhanced genes with positive signal detected by ISH showed spermatocyte-specific expression (Fig. 2F–J). Staining was observed in clearly defined clusters of primary and secondary spermatocytes for all genes analyzed. Their expression pattern indicates that these genes may play a role in spermatogenesis.

Most gonadal RNA would be derived from the germline cells since they comprise the most abundant cell types in the gonads. This may explain why all the genes analyzed in our study were found to be expressing in the germline. Analysis of some of the weakly expressed ‘gonad-enhanced’ genes by ISH may in turn reveal genes which are specific to gonadal somatic cells. In addition to validating our array data, our ISH results have also enabled us to identify new gonadal germ cell-markers from zebrafish.

Microarray data analysis reveals gonad-enhanced expression for several characterized and novel genes

A number of gonad-enhanced genes identified from our array were previously reported to be involved in gonad development and function. For example, the tektin-1 gene (tekt1) and the 11β-hydroxylase gene (cyp11b), which have been implicated in spermatogenesis in mice and humans [49] and testicular differentiation in teleosts [15], [50], showed higher expression levels in the testis (127.8-fold and 13.6-fold respectively).

Some of the gonad-enhanced genes have important molecular functions and could possibly be implicated in gonad development and function. For example, the cdc20 gene showed 69.3-fold and 18-fold expression levels in the ovary and testis respectively. This WD40-repeat protein, which is a homolog of fizzy in Drosophila and Xenopus, is required to activate the anaphase-promoting complex (APC) to enable anaphase initiation and exit from mitosis [51], [52]. Its strong expression in zebrafish gonads may indicate an involvement in cell division during oogenesis and spermatogenesis.

Of the 2903 gonad-enhanced transcripts, 1008 were found to be novel (without any functional information from zebrafish or other organisms). Studies of these genes with unknown functions can lead to further elucidation of various aspects of zebrafish gonad development and function including gonadal differentiation.

Several members of the septin gene family are predominantly expressed in the zebrafish gonad

One member of the septin gene family (septin 4) is required for normal sperm development in mice [53], [54]. We found that several other members of the septin gene family are highly expressed in the gonads of zebrafish (Fig. 3), suggesting a common role of septins in gonad development and/or function. The septins are a family of cytoskeletal GTP-binding proteins found in fungi and animals. They are involved in diverse processes such as cytokinesis, exocytosis, tumorigenesis, maintenance of cell polarity and apoptosis (for reviews, see [55], [56]). Most septin transcripts undergo alternative splicing and their splice variants are expressed differentially in various tissues [56], [57].

Figure 3
Hierarchical clustering of expression profiles of five members of the septin gene family in zebrafish.

We identified five members of the septin gene family from our array (sept4, 6, 7, 8 and 9; Fig. 3). The expression profiles for sept6, sept9 and sept8 were highly correlated to each other, while those of sept4 and sept7 formed a separate cluster. All, except for sept7, showed the highest expression levels in either one or both gonads.

Our array data revealed that sept4, which has been implicated in various functions from cytokinesis to apoptosis to tumor suppression [58][60], was most highly expressed in the testis (137.4-fold), consistently with data from zebrafish [43] and mice [53]. In mice, homozygous Sept4 mutants have immotile and structurally defective sperm due to a disorganized annulus (a ring-like structure in the sperm tail), indicating a role in spermiogenesis [53], [54]. We performed in situ hybridization on adult zebrafish testis sections and found that sept4 was expressed in the primary and secondary spermatocytes (and possibly round spermatids) (Fig. 2G). This is in contrast to the more restricted expression pattern observed in mouse, where specific testicular localization to post-meiotic round spermatids and spermatozoa was found [53]. Our results, therefore, indicate that sept4 may be involved in earlier stages of spermatogenesis in zebrafish, possibly in cytokinesis during meiosis.

Another member of the family, sept9, showed the highest expression in the gonads, with 4.8-fold and 1.6-fold expression levels in the ovary and testis respectively. Previous reports have shown that SEPT9 is ubiquitously expressed in human tissues [61], although one isoform shows higher expression in the ovary than testis [62]. Mammalian SEPT9 has been implicated in a wide range of cancers including ovarian cancer [61][63].

On the other hand, while sept7 had the highest expression in the female ‘rest-of-body’, it also showed high expression in the testis (2.3-fold and 1.4-fold expression levels respectively). Both sept7 and sept9 have been implicated in germ cell cytokinesis as they localize to germ cell intercellular bridges [64]. Hence, it is possible that these genes may play a role in germ cell cytokinesis in the zebrafish gonad.

Our data also showed that the sept6 gene showed the highest expression in the ovary and much lower level in the testis (3.7- vs. 1-fold). High expression levels were also observed in the female and male brains (1.4-fold and 1.8-fold respectively). In contrast, SEPT6 is ubiquitously expressed in humans with higher levels observed in lymphoid and hematopoietic tissues [57]. It is not known if sept6 plays a role in gonad development and function but its interaction with sept9 [65] and its strong expression in the zebrafish ovary indicate a potential involvement.

We have also identified on our array the sept8 gene which was most highly expressed in the gonads (3.8- and 4.2-fold expression levels in the ovary and testis respectively). Similarly, Blaser and colleagues [66] have shown that one isoform of SEPT8 was highly expressed in human gonads. While the function of this isoform remains unknown, its strong expression in the gonads may indicate an involvement in gonad development and function. Since Sept8 forms a complex with Sept5 in mouse gonads [66] and since the latter is involved in exocytosis [67], it has been suggested that Sept8 could play a role in the regulation of hormone secretion [66]. In light of the above findings, it would be interesting to further characterize the septins in order to elucidate their potential roles in zebrafish gonad development and/or function.

The ovarian and testicular transcriptomes of zebrafish are correlated with each other and with those of the male and female brain

In order to compare transcriptional profiles across all eight organs, hierarchical clustering was performed with a similarity measure using Pearson correlation coefficient and a complete linkage algorithm on 6331 genes which had expression levels above those of negative controls. (All negative control probes, β-actin probes and probes corresponding to RNA spikes were eliminated from this analysis.) The resulting condition tree (Fig. 4) revealed similar expression levels between biological and technical replicates, highlighting the minimal inter- and intra-array hybridization variation. As expected from an array enriched in gonad-derived clones, the highest number of strongly-expressed transcripts was found in the ovary and testis. Although the organ pairs of the two sexes clustered together, distinct differences were observed for all four sample types tested, particularly between the ovary and testis. In addition, the gonad cluster grouped together with the brain cluster, indicating the similarity of the transcriptome among these organs (Fig. 4). The kidney and ‘rest of body’ profiles showed significantly different transcriptional profiles from those of the gonads and brains.

Figure 4
Hierarchical clustering of expression profiles for 6331 genes across eight different organs.

These data were further substantiated by a principle component analysis (PCA), using a mean centering and scaling, which showed a similar correlation between expression profiles of the different organs, albeit an increased distance was observed between the gonads and brains (Fig. S4). Interestingly, when the ovarian and testis transcriptomes were compared on the PCA, the latter appeared to be more closely related to those of the male and female brain than the former. This further substantiates our finding that a higher proportion of genes in the testis are co-expressed in other organs and previous reports stating the similarity in gene expression of the testis and brain in mice and humans [68], [69]. These data point towards the conservation of gene expression patterns of these organs across different organisms. The discovery of gene mutations in mice and humans which result in defects in both the nervous system as well as the male reproductive system further substantiates the link between brain and testicular gene expression [70], [71].

Transcriptional analysis reveals genes with sexually dimorphic co-expression in both the gonads and the brains

While searching for genes differentially expressed in the two sexes, we identified 3080 transcripts which showed statistically significant differences in expression between the male and female brain from the 1-way ANOVA parametric test and Student-Newman-Keuls post hoc test. Out of these, 1641 genes were found to be at least 1.5-fold differentially expressed between the brains of the two sexes. When compared to the list of 2247 genes differentially expressed between the two gonads (Tables S4 and S5), we found 276 genes represented in both groups, indicating that their expression was sexually dimorphic between both organ types (Table 3). There were about twice as many genes (183) showing higher expression levels in the female brains than those showing male brain-enhanced expression (93), whereas the number of genes with higher ovary (143) versus higher testis (133) expression was similar (Table 3; for details, see Tables S8 and S9).

Table 3
Genes* with sexually dimorphic co-expression in both the gonads and the brains.

Sexually dimorphic gene expression has recently been reported in the mouse brain by two research groups [23], [72]. In the first report [23], 54 genes were found to show sexually dimorphic expression in the developing mouse brain (10.5 dpc), with twice as many genes showing enhanced expression in the female brain than in the male brain (36 vs. 18). The second study [72] reported that about 650 genes (14% of those detected from the brain) showed sexually dimorphic expression between the two adult mouse brain types, with about half of them showing higher expression in female brain and the other half in male brain.

We performed real-time PCR on three of the genes showing sexually dimorphic expression in the brain to verify if they were indeed differentially expressed between the male and female adult brain (Fig. 5). These genes included a homolog of the Xenopus tropicalis milk fat globule-EGF factor 8 (mfge8), Wilms' tumor suppressor gene 1 (wt1a) and a homolog of mouse carboxyl ester lipase (cel). In all three cases, the real-time PCR results (Fig. 5) yielded differential expression parallel to that observed on the array, thereby confirming our array data. However, only in the case of mfge8 did we find similar ratios with the two methods; for wt1a and cel, the difference in expression levels was considerably higher on the array. This may be explained by the fact that brain expression levels of both wt1a and cel were very low, hence stretching the limit of microarray detection sensitivity.

Figure 5
Real-time PCR analysis of selected genes which showed sexually dimorphic expression in the zebrafish brain.

The three genes analyzed by real-time PCR in our study have previously been implicated in reproduction. In mice, the Mfge8 gene has been shown to be expressed strongly in the initial segment of the epididymis [73] and has been implicated in cell-cell interactions during fertilization, since the ortholog in pig is expressed on the apical head of the spermatozoa and binds zona pellucida glycoproteins [74], [75]. On the other hand, mutation of WT1 in humans leads to Wilms' tumor, a pediatric kidney cancer [76], [77]. Multiple organ defects, including in the kidneys and gonads, have been reported in Wt1 knockout mice [78]. In zebrafish and mice, high expression levels have been observed in the gonads [79]. The cel gene is required for conversion of cholesterol esters to free cholesterol for the biosynthesis of steroid hormones. Our observation that these genes are also differentially expressed in the male and female brain indicates their potential involvement in the interplay between the brain and the gonads to regulate gonad development and function.

This is the first report of sexually dimorphic gene expression on a global scale in a teleost brain. The genes we have uncovered that show differences in expression level between the male and female brains and are highly expressed in the gonads could potentially be important for gonad development and function, since it has been shown in birds that a genetically male brain is necessary for normal testis development [16]. Perhaps, the differential expression may be required in the complex regulatory networks involved in the brain-pituitary-gonadal axis that links the nervous and reproductive systems. Such genes are hormonally-influenced and may need to be expressed at different levels in order to establish the differences in the two gonads. Genes differentially expressed in the two brains may also act independently of hormones to directly establish brain sexual differentiation, gender-specific behavior and possibly gonad development and function, as shown recently in birds and mammals [21], [22], [80].

The Gonad Uniclone Microarray: a useful tool for studies on reproduction in teleosts

The use of the Gonad Uniclone Microarray has enabled us to generate a global profile of gonadal expression patterns in adult zebrafish. We have also been able to identify genes that showed enhanced or sexually dimorphic expression in the gonads. Several genes were also found to be differentially expressed both in the brains and the gonads of the two sexes, suggesting a sexually dimorphic role for these genes in both of these organs. Further analysis of some of these genes may lead to the discovery of gonad- and/or brain-expressed markers with early sex-specificity, provided that their sexually dimorphic expression is also observable at early stages. In addition, the possible availability of the brain for molecular sexing of individuals would enable researchers to preserve the gonad for other studies.

Currently, we are using our array for the analysis of zebrafish gonad differentiation by comparing the expression profiles of developing ovaries, testes and brains isolated from juvenile vas::egfp-transgenic individuals sorted on the basis of the dynamic EGFP levels of their gonads [9]. The comparison of the global expression profiles of these developing gonads with each other and with those of the adult organs is expected to provide us with a deeper understanding of the molecular regulation of juvenile hermaphroditism and possibly even that of protogynous sex change.

The Gonad Uniclone Microarray is therefore a useful tool for researchers analyzing the molecular regulation of gonad development and function, and it may also be used to study the involvement of other organs in these processes, since many gonad-enhanced transcripts identified in our study were not exclusively expressed in the gonads. In addition, our array may be suitable for researchers studying genetically-inherited diseases with distinct effects on gonadal phenotype in zebrafish, as well as the genomics of other teleosts for which such a resource is not available [81]. Since several genes have been shown to play similar roles in gonadogenesis in zebrafish and other vertebrates including mammals [13], the data obtained in this study may provide information on the development of the reproductive system in zebrafish, other teleosts and other vertebrates, and may even contribute new pieces to the complex puzzle of the genetic causes of infertility in vertebrates.

Methods

Fish stocks and collection of gonadal samples

Zebrafish individuals from the AB strain and from a local strain, called Toh, were kept at our fish facility at ambient temperature and light cycle (12/12 hours) in AHAB (Aquatic Habitats, Apopka, FL, USA) recirculation systems. Adult gonads were isolated as described earlier [34]. For juvenile gonad isolation, the larvae were placed on an examination plate ventral side up, surrounded by 1.5% low melt agarose in egg water (60 µg/ml Instant Ocean sea salts) and overlaid with cold 1× phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The body cavity was dissected and the gonads were removed using fine forceps (Dumostar #55, Dumont, Switzerland).

cDNA synthesis and library construction

Normalized and ORESTES cDNA libraries from adult testis were generated earlier [34]. For the generation of three cDNA libraries from differentiating gonads (Table S1), total RNA was isolated from the gonad of 3 and 4 wpf mixed-sex individuals and 5 wpf males. Full-length cDNA was synthesized using Creator Smart Library Construction Kit (Clontech, Mountain View, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instruction. After Sfi I restriction enzyme digestion, the adaptors and short cDNAs were removed by ChromaSpin 400 column (Clontech). The size fractionated cDNA pool was then cloned into pBS-SK-Sfi (a pBluescript based vector; detailed map is available on request) and transformed into E. coli XL10-Gold cells. Clones were sequenced from each library as described earlier; clones from full-length and normalized libraries were sequenced from the 5′ end [34].

For the generation of 4 wpf subtracted libraries, total RNA samples from 4 wpf individuals were sorted into two groups (‘sexed’) using an earlier version of the Gonad Uniclone array (data not shown). Two sets of subtractive hybridizations were performed: 3 wpf gonad (driver) from 4 wpf ‘male gonad’ (tester), and 4 wpf ‘female gonad’ (driver) from 4 wpf ‘male gonad’ (tester). The PCR-Select™ cDNA subtraction kit (Clontech) was used to enrich for developmental stage-specific fragments from the SMART cDNA template according to the recommendations of the manufacturer. To decrease the number of ‘background clones’, mirror-oriented selection was applied as described previously [82].

A 5 wpf transforming male gonad cDNA library was also generated by subtracting against 5 wpf ovary. Zebrafish transgenic to vas::egfp were sorted based on their gonadal EGFP levels as transforming males and juvenile females at the age of 5 wpf [9]. cDNA was synthesized from 5 wpf transforming male gonad and 5 wpf ovary total RNA using SMART PCR cDNA synthesis kit (Clontech). PCR-Select™ cDNA subtraction kit (Clontech) was used to enrich for fragments that were present in the 5 wpf transforming male gonad but not in the 5 wpf ovary sample.

The selectively amplified cDNA fragments (in average 400–800 bp in length) were ligated into pGEM-T (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) cloning vector. In total, 1400 clones were picked from the three subtracted libraries and their inserts were sequenced using M13 forward or reverse primer.

Sequence pre-processing

A total of 4746 ‘raw’ ESTs sequenced from adult testis and ovary, and 11212 ‘raw’ ESTs obtained from differentiating gonad were generated in our laboratory during this study and combined with our previously submitted data set of 11122 ESTs [34]. Pre-processing included the removal of 291 chimeric clones and 86 ESTs containing sequencing errors. In addition, sequences shorter than 100 nucleotides (729 ESTs) were removed together with a set of 1217 ESTs that was repeat-masked over at least 30% of an EST length. The remaining 24813 ESTs were combined with gonad-derived ESTs obtained from Genbank.

Similarly, a total of 90668 gonad-derived ESTs were obtained from GenBank. Chimeric clones (499) and 1568 ESTs that were repeat-masked over at least 30% of an EST length were removed and the remaining 88601 ESTs were added to the 24813 ESTs generated in our laboratory. In addition, a set of 3224 sequences was obtained from NCBI's reference sequence division, thus producing a final data set of 116638 ESTs.

Clustering and sequence analysis

A total of 116638 ESTs were clustered as described earlier [34]. All ESTs that were <100 nucleotides and masked over at least 30% of an EST length, were reintroduced as singletons after clustering the final data set. We re-introduced those sequences that were included in the Gonad Uniclone macroarray [34] but had been removed during the present pre-processing due to more stringent criteria.

Clones representing transcripts with at least one sequence from our full-length or normalized libraries (i.e. sequences that have not been represented in the previous Gonad UniClone set; [34]) were selected to extend our non-redundant cDNA clone collection (an additional 3634 clones). All the 6370 selected clones were subjected to 3′-end sequencing using an 18mer oligo-dT primer with single-base anchor as described in [83].

Singletons derived from our libraries and clusters without any public ESTs were assessed in silico to retain every query EST that does not match data in Genbank since these ESTs represent data that have not been sampled by others. Transcripts were BLAST searched locally against the zebrafish division of Genbank dbEST using default parameters with the exception of e-value <1e-02. BLAST results were filtered by using a sequence similarity threshold defined as 70% sequence identity across 30% of the transcript length. (By using less stringent criteria, we found hits to “weak homologs” and ensured that our new ESTs indeed represent data that had not been sampled in the current public databases.) Sequences that did not show any sequence similarity to zebrafish transcripts were screened against Genbank non-redundant database. The absence of any identifiable homologs in Genbank resulted in the ESTs being classified as either ‘noncoding’ as in the case of sequence identity to intergenic regions or ‘unknown’ in the event that no significant sequence identity was observed (e-value threshold of 1e-02).

Amplification and purification of cDNA inserts

Adult gonad cDNAs in pBluescript II SK (+) (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA, USA) were amplified in 90 µl colony PCR reactions using the following forward and reverse primers respectively: 5′-GGGCTGCAGGAATTCGGC-3′ and 5′-GGGTTAAGCGGGATATCACTCAG-3′. cDNAs from differentiating gonads in pBS-SK-Sfi were amplified with the following forward and reverse primers respectively: 5′-TCCCAGTCACGACGTTG-3′ and 5′-CCATGATTACGCCAAGC-3′. Control and candidate cDNAs were cloned into pBluescript II SK (+) and pBS-SK-Sfi respectively and were PCR amplified with M13 primers. PCR product quantity and quality were assessed by gel electrophoresis.

A Biomek 2000 workstation (Beckman Coulter, Inc., Fullerton, CA, USA) was used to purify the PCR products by a vacuum-based, size exclusion separation through Montage PCRμ96 Plates (Millipore Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA), following the manufacturer's instructions. The DNA was eluted in 50 µl sterile water and separated equally into two 384-well polypropylene plates. The cDNAs were dried completely in a speedvac and then resuspended in 10 µl ArrayIt Micro Spotting Solution Plus (TeleChem International Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA). The average concentration of purified PCR products was 180 ng/µl.

Printing of Gonad Uniclone Microarray

The array was designed according to MIAME guidelines [84]. Purified cDNA inserts were spotted onto amine-coated microarray slides (Genetix, Boston, MA, USA) with 24 Stealth SMP3 Micro Spotting Pins (TeleChem International, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) using the GeneMachines OmniGrid 100 Microarrayer (Genomic Solutions, Ann Arbor, MI, USA). Spots were printed at an average spot diameter of 145 µm with a vertical and horizontal spot spacing of 180 µm to form a 4×12 subarray layout. A total of 6912 probes were printed in duplicate arrays on each slide. In order to assess spot morphology, red reflect scanning with a 633 nm laser at 10 µm resolution was performed using the Scanarray Express Microarray Scanner (Perkin Elmer, Boston, MA, USA).

The probes comprised 6,370 unique Gonad Uniclones, plus 24 candidate genes in duplicate and several control probes. Positive controls included 132 β-actin clones and 111 clones representing 12 other ubiquitously-expressed genes. Negative controls comprised empty cloning vectors (111 pBluescript II SK (+) clones and 18 pBS-SK-Sfi clones), 78 clones representing nine Arabidopsis, viral or fungal genes which showed no sequence similarity to those of zebrafish, triplicates of two clones containing a poly-A tail and flanking vector arms from both cloning vectors which are present in all clones and six samples of spotting solution. Controls were interspersed throughout the array. To validate and monitor target labeling and hybridization, eight Array Control™ PCR Spots (Ambion, Austin, Texas, USA), a set of E. coli DNAs designed to hybridize to eight Array Control™ RNA Spikes (Ambion), were included in four concentrations spanning the probe concentration range (25, 60, 120, 250 ng/ul). Information regarding the probes and genes on the Gonad Uniclone Microarray is shown in Table S10 (ArrayExpress accession number: A-MEXP-838). A full list of probes present on the array is listed in Table S11.

Target amplification and labeling

For generation of labeled targets, five female and five male 10-month-old zebrafish from Toh strain were dissected and total RNA was isolated from the gonad, brain, kidney and ‘rest of body’ using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Following DNase treatment, RNA quantification was performed using the NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, Inc., Wilmington, DE, USA). RNA quality was assessed by agarose gel electrophoresis and by analyzing RNA samples on the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Palo Alto, CA, USA) using the RNA 6000 Nano LabChip Kit (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The RNA integrity number (RIN) ranged from 6–9 for all samples (a RIN of 1 represents a completely degraded sample whereas a RIN of 10 represents an intact sample). Four of the five individuals with the best RNA quality were selected for subsequent reactions.

Target amplification and labeling were performed using the Amino Allyl MessageAmp™ II aRNA Amplification Kit (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA), following manufacturer's instructions. Total RNA (800 ng) from each target organ was subjected to reverse transcription, second strand synthesis and 1-round amplification by in vitro transcription, from which 20 µg amino allyl aRNA was labeled with Alexa Fluor 647 reactive dyes (Invitrogen). For the common reference, 200 ng total RNA from each of the four target organs (gonad, brain, kidney and ‘rest-of-body’) were pooled from one male and one female individual separately and amplified as described above. Ten µg of amino allyl aRNA from each individual was then pooled and labeled with Alexa Fluor 555 reactive dyes. Both aRNA and labeled aRNA were quantified on the NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, Inc.). Frequency of incorporation (FOI) of the targets ranged from 31–58 dye molecules/1000 nucleotides. Target quality was assessed by agarose gel electrophoresis. Gels of labeled targets were imaged using the Typhoon 9200 Variable Mode Imager and visualized using ImageQuant TL software (GE Healthcare).

A set of eight E. coli RNA spikes (10–250 pg) from ArrayControl™ (Ambion) which are complementary to the Array Control PCR Spots on the array were included in each labeling reaction in different ratios as a labeling and hybridization control.

Hybridization and washing of the microarray

Printed slides were heated on a 100°C heat block for 5 sec after which DNA was UV crosslinked to the slide at 120 mJ using a UV Stratalinker 2400 (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA, USA). The slides were then heated to 100°C for 20 sec after which they were blocked using a protocol adapted from [85]. Slides were immersed and shaken for 1 hr at 40 rpm in a solution of 1.2 g succinic anhydride (Fluka, Buchs, Switzerland) freshly dissolved in 240 ml anhydrous 1,2-dichloroethane (DCE; Fisher Scientific, New Jersey, USA) and 3 ml 1-methylimidazole (Fluka). After blocking, the slides were rinsed once in DCE and three times in sterile water. DNA was denatured by immersing the slides in boiling water for 2 min, after which the slides were dipped twice in 100% ethanol and immediately spin-dried in an Eppendorf 5804 centrifuge.

A total of 32 hybridizations were performed, which included the four pairs of target organs (male and female) from four biological replicates, all hybridized against the common reference. Fifty pmol each of Alexa Fluor 555 and 647 labeled targets were dried completely in a speedvac and dissolved in 50 µl of Micromax hybridization buffer (Perkin Elmer). The targets were denatured at 90°C for 2 min and then incubated at 65°C. A MAUI Mixer FL Hybridization Chamber Lid (BioMicro Systems, Salt Lake City, UT, USA) was adhered onto the slide to form a sealed chamber, allowing 46 µl of target to be loaded onto the array. Hybridization was performed at 65°C for 16 hours on a MAUI 4-Bay Hybridization System (BioMicro Systems) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

The post-hybridization wash protocol was adapted from Diehl et al. [85]. After hybridization, the MAUI Mixer was removed from the slide in a 65°C solution of 2× SSC, 0.1% SDS. The slide was then washed in fresh 2× SSC, 0.1% SDS for 2 min, 1× SSC for 3 min and 0.2× SSC for 3 min. All three washes were performed at room temperature with shaking at 50 rpm. The slides were then dipped into fresh 0.2× SSC and immediately blow-dried using a nitrogen gun at a pressure of 7 bar.

Microarray scanning and statistical analysis

The arrays were scanned at 5 µm resolution using the ScanArray Express Microarray Scanner. A 543 nm and 633 nm laser with 90% laser power were used to excite Alexa Fluor 555 and 647 fluorophores respectively. Scanned TIFF images of the three biological replicates which gave the best hybridization signal and lowest background were used for statistical analysis (24 images in total). The median of signal and background intensities from the Alexa Fluor 555 and 647 channels were quantified using GenePix Pro 6.0 image acquisition and analysis software (Axon Instruments, Union City, CA, USA).

Statistical analysis was performed using GeneSpring GX 7.3 (Agilent). Local background-subtracted median intensities of 6739 genes were subjected to Locally Weighed Scatterplot Smoothing (Lowess) normalization, global normalization to 33 positive control probes (comprising β-actin and nine of the 12 ubiquitously-expressing genes mentioned above) and gene normalization to its median. To eliminate signals that were close to background levels, probes which showed intensities lower than the median raw intensity of 111 negative control probes on each slide were excluded from analysis. (These 111 probes included 99 pBluescript II SK (+) clones, 6 pBS-SK-Sfi clones and 6 clones containing flanking vector arms and poly-A tail.) The resulting probes were subjected to a 1-way ANOVA parametric test (variances assumed equal; p-value cutoff 0.05) and a multiple testing correction using Benjamini and Hochberg False Discovery Rate to reveal probes that showed statistically significant differences in expression across the eight organs. A Student-Newman-Keuls post hoc test was performed on these genes to identify genes that were differentially expressed in a selected organ(s) compared to the others. All target preparation and hybridization protocols as well as raw expression data are available on ArrayExpress (accession no: E-MEXP-1272).

Quality control of array hybridizations

We adopted the use of a common reference-based design for our experiments. The common reference was generated by pooling equal amounts of targets from the adult gonad, brain, kidney and rest-of-body of both sexes. Such a common reference should hybridize to all spots relevant to the individual target organ hybridizations, thereby enabling a ‘non-zero value’ to be obtained for each spot upon normalization. This strategy has the weakness of being affected by extreme high or low expression level for any given gene in one or more of the organs used.

For each probe, two technical replicates were printed on each microarray. Duplicate spots were located distally from each other to account for any intra-hybridization variation. Scatter plots of background-subtracted raw intensities of Duplicate B against Duplicate A of a single biological replicate of female brain (FB1), male brain (MB2) and ovary (FO3) are shown in Fig. S5. For all three organs, most spots were centered along the 45° line, indicating the similarity in intensities between technical replicates. There were a few spots scattered above or below the line, mostly at the lower signal range. We used the square of the Pearson correlation coefficient (R2) as a measure of the relatedness between technical replicates. A high level of correlation was obtained between technical replicates as the median R2 value for normalized intensities across all 24 hybridizations was 0.977. These results confirm that the hybridization conditions used for our arrays generated highly reproducible technical replicates, hence reflecting the reliability of our data.

For every organ type, the three best biological replicates (judged on the basis of the linearity of scatter plot) were included in the analysis. Scatter plots of the normalized intensities of various biological replicates of the testis and female brain plotted against each other showed that most genes were centered along the gradient of 1, indicating that the data from the replicates were reproducible (Fig. S6). As with the technical replicates, genes which were scattered above or below the line were mostly at the lower signal range. The biological replicates were confirmed to show highly reproducible signals as a high level of correlation was obtained across all 24 hybridizations (median R2 value for normalized intensities = 0.909).

The eight spiked-in controls added in varying ratios during target labeling produced raw/control ratios that were similar to expected ratios (data not shown). This highlights the efficiency and sensitivity of the target labeling, and the reproducibility of target hybridization.

In situ hybridization

We performed in situ hybridization (ISH) for six ovary-expressed and ten testis-expressed genes on adult ovary or testis sections. Eco RI or Spe I-linearized Gonad Uniclone plasmids containing the cDNAs of interest were in vitro transcribed using DIG RNA Labeling Mix (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany) and T7 RNA polymerase (Promega), following manufacturer's instructions. Probes larger than 800 bp were hydrolysed at 60°C using 1× carbonate buffer (40 mM NaHCO3, 60 mM Na2CO3) to generate approximately 300 bp fragments.

For ISH, we used a modified protocol based on Strahle et al. [86]. Dissected gonads from two female and two male adult zebrafish (AB strain) were fixed overnight at 4°C in 4% paraformaldehyde in 1× PBS. Ovary and testis sections (20 µm and 18 µm respectively) were made using a cryostat (Leica Microsystems GmbH, Nussloch, Germany), transferred to microscope slides and hybridized overnight at 70°C with DIG-labeled riboprobes at a final concentration of 1 ng/µl. Slides were blocked in a solution containing MABT (5× maleic acid buffer, 20% Tween 20, pH 7.5), 20% fetal bovine serum and 2% blocking reagent (Roche) for 2 hours at room temperature, followed by overnight incubation in a 1:3000 dilution of anti-digoxigenin-AP antibody (Roche) in blocking solution. Slides were stained overnight at room temperature in a solution of NBT (337.5 µg/ml) and BCIP (175 µg/ml) (Roche) in AP staining buffer (100 mM NaCl, 50 mM MgCl2, 100 mM Tris pH 9.5, 0.1% Tween-20). Slides were viewed under a Zeiss Axioplan 2 upright microscope and imaged using a Nikon DXM1200F digital camera and ACT-1 software.

Real-time PCR

Real-time PCRs were performed on three genes that showed differential expression between the male and female brain in the microarray data. Total brain RNA (300 ng) from three male and three female adult individuals was reverse transcribed using the iScript cDNA Synthesis Kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA) following manufacturer's instructions. The RNA used was identical to that used as targets for array hybridization. cDNA (0.5–1 µl) was amplified in 25 µl triplicate reactions containing 0.2 µM primers and 12.5 µl iQ SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad) using a MyiQ Single Colour Real-time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad), according to manufacturer's instructions. Primers used for amplification were as follows: mfge8: F-5′ TTATCAAGGCTTTCAAGGTGGC 3′, R-5′ GGCTTTACGGCAGACAACAGG 3′, wt1a: F-5′ GAGCCATCCCGGAGGTTATGA 3′, R-5′ TTGGTCTCGGTTGAACGCACA 3′; cel: F-5′ ACATTCCCTCAATCAACAACGC 3′, R-5′ CAAAGGCTTTCCAAACACATACTG 3′;. Either a plasmid DNA or cDNA dilution series was used to generate a standard curve for quantification of transcript levels and for measuring amplification efficiency. For each sample, β–actin was amplified in parallel using the following primers: F-5′ CCATCCTTCTTGGGTATGGAATC 3′, R-5′ GGTGGGGCAATGATCTTGATC 3′, to normalize transcript levels. Negative control PCRs containing RNA templates and β–actin primers were included for each individual to rule out the possibility of genomic DNA contamination.

Supporting Information

Figure S1

Expression profiles of selected candidate genes across eight organs in adult zebrafish. The normalized intensity (in log scale) is indicated on the y-axis and organ types are stated on the x-axis. FB, FO, FK and FRB represent the brain, ovary, kidney and ‘rest-of-body’ from female zebrafish, while MB, MT, MK and MRB represent the brain, testis, kidney and ‘rest-of-body’ from male zebrafish.

(1.28 MB TIF)

Figure S2

Self-organizing map showing the 1366 genes which had at least 1.5-fold higher expression in the ovary compared to the common reference target. The genes were clustered using 1000000 iterations and a neighbourhood radius of 3.0. The number of genes in each cluster is indicated in parentheses. FB, FO, FK and FRB represent the brain, ovary, kidney and ‘rest-of-body’ from female zebrafish, while MB, MT, MK and MRB represent the brain, testis, kidney and ‘rest-of-body’ from male zebrafish.

(4.58 MB TIF)

Figure S3

Self-organizing map showing the 881 genes which had at least 1.5-fold higher expression in the testis compared to the common reference target. The genes were clustered using 1000000 iterations and a neighbourhood radius of 3.0. The number of genes in each cluster is indicated in parentheses. FB, FO, FK and FRB represent the brain, ovary, kidney and ‘rest-of-body’ from female zebrafish, while MB, MT, MK and MRB represent the brain, testis, kidney and ‘rest-of-body’ from male zebrafish.

(4.69 MB TIF)

Figure S4

Principle component analysis showing correlation between expression profiles of eight different organs in the three biological replicates analyzed. Kidney targets clustered together with ‘rest of body’ to form a distinct group from the ovary, testis and brain targets. The brain targets also showed a higher correlation to the testis than the ovary. FB, FO, FK and FRB represent the brain, ovary, kidney and ‘rest-of-body’ from female zebrafish, while MB, MT, MK and MRB represent the brain, testis, kidney and ‘rest-of-body’ from male zebrafish.

(1.75 MB TIF)

Figure S5

Typical scatter plots showing reproducibility of technical replicates in the following hybridizations: A) female brain (FB), B) male brain (MB) and C) ovary (FO). Background-subtracted raw intensities of Replicate B against Replicate A of a single biological replicate are shown. All hybridizations were performed against a common reference sample containing an equal mixture of labeled targets from adult gonads, brains, kidney and ‘rest-of-body’ from the two sexes.

(2.47 MB TIF)

Figure S6

Scatter plots showing reproducibility of the three biological replicates for testis (MT) and female brain (FB) hybridizations. The normalized intensities of various biological replicates are plotted against each other. A: MT2 vs MT1, B: MT3 vs MT1, C: MT3 vs MT2, D: FB2 vs FB1, E: FB3 vs FB1, F: FB3 vs FB2.

(2.30 MB TIF)

Table S1

Description of the gonad-derived libraries and ESTs used for the extension of the dataset featured on the Gonad Uniclone Microarray. (Abbreviations: FL-full-length, NRM-normalized, ORE-ORESTES, R-random, S/SU-subtracted, wpf-week post fertilization)

(0.02 MB XLS)

Table S2

Domains and corresponding functional classes of 24 clones which did not find hits to characterized genes in Genbank when BLAST-searched at the nucleotide level. *Source: ‘non-coding’: transcripts align to non-coding regions of the zebrafish genome; ‘no hits’: transcripts do not find any significant matches to the zebrafish genome.

(0.02 MB XLS)

Table S3

Normalized intensities (‘Norm’) and corresponding standard error (‘StdErr Norm’) of the 24 candidate genes on the Gonad Uniclone Microarray. Genes which were at least 1.5× more highly expressed in the ovary or testis, compared to the common reference, are underlined or indicated in bold respectively. References which describe the characterization of these genes are also indicated. (FB, FO, FK, FRB: brain, ovary, kidney, ‘rest-of-body’ from female zebrafish; MB, MT, MK, MRB: brain, testis, kidney, ‘rest-of-body’ from male zebrafish. Data from 3 biological replicates is shown.)

(0.09 MB XLS)

Table S4

List of 1366 genes with at least 1.5-fold higher expression in the adult ovary compared to the common reference. Normalized intensities (‘Norm’) and corresponding standard errors (‘StdErr Norm’) are shown. (FB, FO, FK, FRB: brain, ovary, kidney, ‘rest-of-body’ from female zebrafish; MB, MT, MK, MRB: brain, testis, kidney, ‘rest-of-body’ from male zebrafish.)

(0.63 MB XLS)

Table S5

List of 881 genes with at least 1.5-fold higher expression in the adult testis compared to the common reference. Normalized intensities (‘Norm’) and corresponding standard errors (‘StdErr Norm’) are shown. (FB, FO, FK, FRB: brain, ovary, kidney, ‘rest-of-body’ from female zebrafish; MB, MT, MK, MRB: brain, testis, kidney, ‘rest-of-body’ from male zebrafish.)

(0.41 MB XLS)

Table S6

List of 656 genes with at least 1.5-fold higher expression in both the adult ovary and testis compared to the common reference. Normalized intensities (‘Norm’) and corresponding standard errors (‘StdErr Norm’) are shown. (FB, FO, FK, FRB: brain, ovary, kidney, ‘rest-of-body’ from female zebrafish; MB, MT, MK, MRB: brain, testis, kidney, ‘rest-of-body’ from male zebrafish.)

(0.32 MB XLS)

Table S7

List of highly-expressed ovary and testis genes analyzed by in situ hybridization (ISH). Normalized intensities for ovary (FO) and testis (MT) targets and ratios of normalized intensities of FO/MT (or vice versa) are shown.

(0.02 MB XLS)

Table S8

List of 183 gonad-expressed genes that show female brain-enhanced expression. These genes i)show at least 1.5-fold higher expression than the common reference in the female brain and one or both gonads; and ii) are differentially expressed (at least 1.5-fold) both between the gonads and between the brains of the two sexes. Normalized intensities (‘Norm’) and corresponding standard errors (‘StdErr Norm’) are shown, along with the ratios of normalized intensities of female brain:male brain (‘Ratio FB/MB’) and ovary:testis (‘Ratio FO/MT’). (FB, FO, FK, FRB: brain, ovary, kidney, ‘rest-of-body’ from female zebrafish; MB, MT, MK, MRB: brain, testis, kidney, ‘rest-of-body’ from male zebrafish.)

(0.11 MB XLS)

Table S9

List of 93 gonad-expressed genes that show male brain-enhanced expression. These genes i)show at least 1.5-fold higher expression than the common reference in the male brain and one or both gonads; and ii) are differentially expressed (at least 1.5-fold) both between the gonads and between the brains of the two sexes. Normalized intensities (‘Norm’) and corresponding standard errors (‘StdErr Norm’) are shown, along with the ratios of normalized intensities of male brain:female brain (‘Ratio MB/FB’) and ovary:testis (‘Ratio FO/MT’). (FB, FO, FK, FRB: brain, ovary, kidney, ‘rest-of-body’ from female zebrafish; MB, MT, MK, MRB: brain, testis, kidney, ‘rest-of-body’ from male zebrafish.)

(0.07 MB XLS)

Table S10

Composition of probes and genes on Gonad Uniclone Microarray.

(0.01 MB XLS)

Table S11

Complete list of probes on Gonad Uniclone Microarray

(1.10 MB XLS)

Acknowledgments

We thank Woei Chang Liew, Mohammad Sorowar Hossain, Hamsa Srinivasan, Aaron Chuah, Isvary Sivalingam, Deepa Govindasamy, Pusparani Venugopal, Yi Zhen Wee, Melanie Chua Eelyn, Rashmi Sukumaran, Natascha May and William Birch for technical contribution; Linsheng Wong for help with data analysis, Naweed Naqvi, Terje Dokland and Wei-Cai Yang for control probes used on the array. We would also like to thank John Postlethwait and Kellee Siegfrid for their suggestions on the manuscript. The help of TLL Sequencing Facility is also acknowledged.

Footnotes

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Funding: This work was supported by fellowships from Temasek Life Sciences Laboratory and the Department of Biological Sciences of the National University of Singapore as well as by internal research grants from Temasek Life Sciences Laboratory.

References

1. Grunwald DJ, Eisen JS. Headwaters of the zebrafish-emergence of a new model vertebrate. Nat Rev Genet. 2002;3:717–724. [PubMed]
2. Wixon J. Featured organism: Danio rerio, the zebrafish. Yeast. 2000;17:225–231. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Beier DR. Zebrafish: Genomics on the fast track. Genome Res. 1998;8:9–17. [PubMed]
4. Amatruda JF, Shepard JL, Stern HM, Zon LI. Zebrafish as a cancer model system. Cancer Cell. 2002;1:229–231. [PubMed]
5. Dodd A, Curtis PM, Williams LC, Love DA. Zebrafish: bridging the gap between development and disease. Hum Mol Genet. 2000;9:2443–2449. [PubMed]
6. Dooley K, Zon LI. Zebrafish: a model system for the study of human disease. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2000;10:252–256. [PubMed]
7. Takahashi H. Juvenile hermaphroditism in the zebrafish, Brachydanio rerio. Bull Fac Fish Hokkaido Univ. 1977;28:57–65.
8. Maack G, Segner H. Morphological development of the gonads in zebrafish. J Fish Biol. 2003;62:895–906.
9. Wang XG, Bartfai R, Sleptsova-Freidrich I, Orban L. The timing and extent of ‘juvenile ovary’ phase are highly variable during zebrafish testis differentiation. J Fish Biol. 2007;70:1–12.
10. Uchida D, Yamashita M, Kitano T, Iguchi T. Oocyte apoptosis during the transition from ovary-like tissue to testes during sex differentiation of juvenile zebrafish. J Exp Biol. 2002;205:711–718. [PubMed]
11. Chiang EFL, Yan YL, Yann GG, Postlethwait J, Chung BC. Two Cyp19 (P450 aromatase) genes on duplicated zebrafish chromosomes are expressed in ovary or brain. Mol Biol Evol. 2001;18:542–550. [PubMed]
12. von Hofsten J, Larsson A, Olsson PE. Novel steroidogenic factor-1 homolog (ff1d) is coexpressed with anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) in zebrafish. Dev Dyn. 2005;233:595–604. [PubMed]
13. von Hofsten J, Olsson PE. Zebrafish sex determination and differentiation: Involvement of FTZ-F1 genes. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2005;3:63. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Rodriguez-Mari A, Yan YL, BreMiller RA, Wilson C, Canestro C, et al. Characterization and expression pattern of zebrafish anti-Mullerian hormone (amh) relative to sox9a, sox9b, and cyp19a1a, during gonad development. Gene Expr Pattern. 2005;5:655–667. [PubMed]
15. Wang XG, Orban L. Anti-Müllerian hormone and 11ß-hydroxylase show reciprocal expression to that of aromatase in the transforming gonad of zebrafish males. Dev Dyn. 2007;236:1329–1338. [PubMed]
16. Gahr M. Male Japanese quails with female brains do not show male sexual behaviors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:7959–7964. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Munday PL, Buston PM, Warner RR. Diversity and flexibility of sex-change strategies in animals. Trends Ecol Evol. 2006;21:89–95. [PubMed]
18. Francis RC, Barlow GW. Social control of primary sex differentiation in the Midas cichlid. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993;90:10673–10675. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Francis RC. Sexual lability in teleosts: Developmental factors. Quart Rev Biol. 1992;67:1–18.
20. Weltzien FA, Andersson E, Andersen O, Shalchian-Tabrizi K, Norberg B. The brain-pituitary-gonad axis in male teleosts, with special emphasis on flatfish (Pleuronectiformes). Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2004;137:447–477. [PubMed]
21. Dennis C. Brain development: the most important sexual organ. Nature. 2004;427:390–392. [PubMed]
22. Davies W, Wilkinson LS. It is not all hormones: alternative explanations for sexual differentiation of the brain. Brain Res. 2006;1126:36–45. [PubMed]
23. Dewing P, Shi T, Horvath S, Vilain E. Sexually dimorphic gene expression in mouse brain precedes gonadal differentiation. Mol Brain Res. 2003;118:82–90. [PubMed]
24. Jiang M, Ryu J, Kiraly M, Duke K, Reinke V, et al. Genome-wide analysis of developmental and sex-regulated gene expression profiles in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:218–223. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Andrews J, Bouffard GG, Cheadle C, Lu J, Becker KG, et al. Gene discovery using computational and microarray analysis of transcription in the Drosophila melanogaster testis. Genome Res. 2000;10:2030–2043. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. von Schalburg KR, Rise ML, Brown GD, Davidson WS, Koop BF. A comprehensive survey of the genes involved in maturation and development of the rainbow trout ovary. Biol Reprod. 2005;72:687–699. [PubMed]
27. Small CL, Shima JE, Uzumcu M, Skinner MK, Griswold MD. Profiling gene expression during the differentiation and development of the murine embryonic gonad. Biol Reprod. 2005;72:492–501. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
28. Herrera L, Ottolenghi C, Garcia-Ortiz JE, Pellegrini M, Manini F, et al. Mouse ovary developmental RNA and protein markers from gene expression profiling. Dev Biol. 2005;279:271–290. [PubMed]
29. Shima JE, McLean DJ, McCarrey JR, Griswold MD. The murine testicular transcriptome: Characterizing gene expression in the testis during the progression of spermatogenesis. Biol Reprod. 2004;71:319–330. [PubMed]
30. Ton C, Stamatiou D, Dzau VJ, Liew CC. Construction of a zebrafish cDNA microarray: gene expression profiling of the zebrafish during development. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002;296:1134–1142. [PubMed]
31. Lo J, Lee S, Xu M, Liu F, Ruan H, et al. 15000 unique zebrafish EST clusters and their future use in microarray for profiling gene expression patterns during embryogenesis. Genome Res. 2003;13:455–466. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
32. van der Ven K, De Wit M, Keil D, Moens L, Van Leemput K, et al. Development and application of a brain-specific cDNA microarray for effect evaluation of neuro-active pharmaceuticals in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol. 2005;141:408–417. [PubMed]
33. Wardle FC, Odom DT, Bell GW, Yuan B, Danford TW, et al. Zebrafish promoter microarrays identify actively transcribed embryonic genes. Genome Biol. 2006;7:R71. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
34. Li Y, Chia JM, Bartfai R, Christoffels A, Yue GH, et al. Comparative analysis of the testis and ovary transcriptomes in zebrafish by combining experimental and computational tools. Comp Funct Genomics. 2004;5:403–418. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
35. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, et al. Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat Genet. 2000;25:25–29. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
36. Wang H, Gong Z. Characterization of two zebrafish cDNA clones encoding egg envelope proteins ZP2 and ZP3. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1999;1446:156–160. [PubMed]
37. Wassarman PM, Jovine L, Litscher ES. Mouse zona pellucida genes and glycoproteins. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2004;105:228–234. [PubMed]
38. Mold DE, Kim IF, Tsai CM, Lee D, Chang CY, et al. Cluster of genes encoding the major egg envelope protein of zebrafish. Mol Reprod Dev. 2001;58:4–14. [PubMed]
39. Rey R, Lukas-Croisier C, Lasala C, Bedecarras P. AMH/MIS: what we know already about the gene, the protein and its regulation. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2003;211:21–31. [PubMed]
40. Josso N, di Clemente N, Gouedard L. Anti-Mullerian hormone and its receptors. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2001;179:25–32. [PubMed]
41. Josso N, Racine C, di Clemente N, Rey R, Xavier F. The role of anti-Mullerian hormone in gonadal development. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 1998;145:3–7. [PubMed]
42. di Clemente N, Josso N, Gouedard L, Belville C. Components of the anti-Mullerian hormone signaling pathway in gonads. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2003;211:9–14. [PubMed]
43. Santos EM, Workman VL, Paull GC, Filby AL, Van Look KJ, et al. Molecular basis of gender and reproductive status in breeding zebrafish. Physiol Genomics. 2007;30:111–122. [PubMed]
44. Picard JY, Benarous R, Guerrier D, Josso N, Kahn A. Cloning and expression of cDNA for anti-mullerian hormone. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1986;83:5464–5468. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
45. Munsterberg A, Lovell-Badge R. Expression of the mouse anti-mullerian hormone gene suggests a role in both male and female sexual differentiation. Development. 1991;113:613–624. [PubMed]
46. di Clemente N, Ghaffari S, Pepinsky RB, Pieau C, Josso N, et al. A quantitative and interspecific test for biological activity of anti-mullerian hormone - the fetal ovary aromatase assay. Development. 1992;114:721–727. [PubMed]
47. Giuili G, Shen WH, Ingraham HA. The nuclear receptor SF-1 mediates sexually dimorphic expression of Mullerian Inhibiting Substance, in vivo. Development. 1997;124:1799–1807. [PubMed]
48. Liu X, Wang H, Gong Z. Tandem-repeated zebrafish zp3 genes possess oocyte-specific promoters and are insensitive to estrogen induction. Biol Reprod. 2006;74:1016–1025. [PubMed]
49. Xu M, Zhou Z, Cheng C, Zhao W, Tang R, et al. Cloning and characterization of a novel human TEKTIN1 gene. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2001;33:1172–1182. [PubMed]
50. Liu S, Govoroun M, D'Cotta H, Ricordel MJ, Lareyre JJ, et al. Expression of cytochrome P450(11beta) (11beta-hydroxylase) gene during gonadal sex differentiation and spermatogenesis in rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2000;75:291–298. [PubMed]
51. Kramer ER, Gieffers C, Holzl G, Hengstschlager M, Peters JM. Activation of the human anaphase-promoting complex by proteins of the CDC20/Fizzy family. Curr Biol. 1998;8:1207–1210. [PubMed]
52. Lorca T, Castro A, Martinez AM, Vigneron S, Morin N, et al. Fizzy is required for activation of the APC/cyclosome in Xenopus egg extracts. EMBO J. 1998;17:3565–3575. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
53. Kissel H, Georgescu MM, Larisch S, Manova K, Hunnicutt GR, et al. The Sept4 septin locus is required for sperm terminal differentiation in mice. Dev Cell. 2005;8:353–364. [PubMed]
54. Ihara M, Kinoshita A, Yamada S, Tanaka H, Tanigaki A, et al. Cortical organization by the septin cytoskeleton is essential for structural and mechanical integrity of mammalian spermatozoa. Dev Cell. 2005;8:343–352. [PubMed]
55. Kinoshita M. The septins. Genome Biol. 2003;4:236. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
56. Hall PA, Russell SE. The pathobiology of the septin gene family. J Pathol. 2004;204:489–505. [PubMed]
57. Hall PA, Jung K, Hillan KJ, Russell SE. Expression profiling the human septin gene family. J Pathol. 2005;206:269–278. [PubMed]
58. Elhasid R, Sahar D, Merling A, Zivony Y, Rotem A, et al. Mitochondrial pro-apoptotic ARTS protein is lost in the majority of acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients. Oncogene. 2004;23:5468–5475. [PubMed]
59. Larisch S, Yi Y, Lotan R, Kerner H, Eimerl S, et al. A novel mitochondrial septin-like protein, ARTS, mediates apoptosis dependent on its P-loop motif. Nat Cell Biol. 2000;2:915–921. [PubMed]
60. Zhang J, Kong C, Xie H, McPherson PS, Grinstein S, et al. Phosphatidylinositol polyphosphate binding to the mammalian septin H5 is modulated by GTP. Curr Biol. 1999;9:1458–1467. [PubMed]
61. Osaka M, Rowley JD, Zeleznik-Le NJ. MSF (MLL septin-like fusion), a fusion partner gene of MLL, in a therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia with a t(11;17)(q23;q25). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:6428–6433. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
62. Scott M, Hyland PL, McGregor G, Hillan KJ, Russell SE, et al. Multimodality expression profiling shows SEPT9 to be overexpressed in a wide range of human tumours. Oncogene. 2005;24:4688–4700. [PubMed]
63. Montagna C, Lyu MS, Hunter K, Lukes L, Lowther W, et al. The Septin 9 (MSF) gene is amplified and overexpressed in mouse mammary gland adenocarcinomas and human breast cancer cell lines. Cancer Res. 2003;63:2179–2187. [PubMed]
64. Greenbaum MP, Ma L, Matzuk MM. Conversion of midbodies into germ cell intercellular bridges. Dev Biol. 2007;305:389–396. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
65. Hanai N, Nagata K, Kawajiri A, Shiromizu T, Saitoh N, et al. Biochemical and cell biological characterization of a mammalian septin, Sept11. FEBS Lett. 2004;568:83–88. [PubMed]
66. Blaser S, Jersch K, Hainmann I, Zieger W, Wunderle D, et al. Isolation of new splice isoforms, characterization and expression analysis of the human septin SEPT8 (KIAA0202). Gene. 2003;312:313–320. [PubMed]
67. Dent J, Kato K, Peng XR, Martinez C, Cattaneo M, et al. A prototypic platelet septin and its participation in secretion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:3064–3069. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
68. Guo J, Zhu P, Wu C, Yu L, Zhao S, et al. In silico analysis indicates a similar gene expression pattern between human brain and testis. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2003;103:58–62. [PubMed]
69. Guo JH, Huang Q, Studholme DJ, Wu CQ, Zhao SY. Transcriptomic analyses support the similarity of gene expression between brain and testis in human as well as mouse. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2005;111:107–109. [PubMed]
70. Dragatsis I, Levine MS, Zeitlin S. Inactivation of Hdh in the brain and testis results in progressive neurodegeneration and sterility in mice. Nat Genet. 2000;26:300–306. [PubMed]
71. Kitamura K, Yanazawa M, Sugiyama N, Miura H, Iizuka-Kogo A, et al. Mutation of ARX causes abnormal development of forebrain and testes in mice and X-linked lissencephaly with abnormal genitalia in humans. Nat Genet. 2002;32:359–369. [PubMed]
72. Yang X, Schadt EE, Wang S, Wang H, Arnold AP, et al. Tissue-specific expression and regulation of sexually dimorphic genes in mice. Genome Res. 2006;16:995–1004. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
73. Hsia N, Cornwall GA. DNA microarray analysis of region-specific gene expression in the mouse epididymis. Biol Reprod. 2004;70:448–457. [PubMed]
74. Ensslin M, Vogel T, Calvete JJ, Thole HH, Schmidtke J, et al. Molecular cloning and characterization of P47, a novel boar sperm-associated zona pellucida-binding protein homologous to a family of mammalian secretory proteins. Biol Reprod. 1998;58:1057–1064. [PubMed]
75. Petrunkina AM, Lakamp A, Gentzel M, Ekhlasi-Hundrieser M, Topfer-Petersen E. Fate of lactadherin P47 during post-testicular maturation and capacitation of boar spermatozoa. Reproduction. 2003;125:377–387. [PubMed]
76. Call KM, Glaser T, Ito CY, Buckler AJ, Pelletier J, et al. Isolation and characterization of a zinc finger polypeptide gene at the human chromosome 11 Wilms' tumor locus. Cell. 1990;60:509–520. [PubMed]
77. Gessler M, Poustka A, Cavenee W, Neve RL, Orkin SH, et al. Homozygous deletion in Wilms tumours of a zinc-finger gene identified by chromosome jumping. Nature. 1990;343:774–778. [PubMed]
78. Kreidberg JA, Sariola H, Loring JM, Maeda M, Pelletier J, et al. WT-1 is required for early kidney development. Cell. 1993;74:679–691. [PubMed]
79. Bollig F, Mehringer R, Perner B, Hartung C, Schafer M, et al. Identification and comparative expression analysis of a second wt1 gene in zebrafish. Dev Dyn. 2006;235:554–561. [PubMed]
80. Arnold AP. Sex chromosomes and brain gender. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004;5:701–708. [PubMed]
81. Orban L, Wu QJ. Cyprinids. In: Kole C, Kocher TD, editors. Genome Mapping and Genomics in Animals: Fishes and Aquatic Animals. Berlin, Germany: Springer Verlag; 2008. (in press)
82. Rebrikov DV, Britanova OV, Gurskaya NV, Lukyanov KA, Tarabykin VS, et al. Mirror orientation selection (MOS): a method for eliminating false positive clones from libraries generated by suppression subtractive hybridization. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;20:e90. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
83. Liao J, Gong Z. Sequencing of 3′ cDNA clones using anchored oligo(dT) primers. Biotechniques. 1997;23:368–370. [PubMed]
84. Brazma A, Hingamp P, Quackenbush J, Sherlock G, Spellman P, et al. Minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAME) - toward standards for microarray data. Nat Genet. 2001;29:365–371. [PubMed]
85. Diehl F, Grahlmann S, Beier M, Hoheisel JD. Manufacturing DNA microarrays of high spot homogeneity and reduced background signal. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29:E38. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
86. Strahle U, Blader P, Adam J, Ingham PW. A simple and efficient procedure for non-isotopic in situ hybridization to sectioned material. Trends Genet. 1994;10:75–76. [PubMed]

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of Public Library of Science
PubReader format: click here to try

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...