• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of mlabJournal informationSubscribeSubmissions on the Publisher web siteCurrent issue of BMLA in PMCAlso see JMLA journal in PMC
Bull Med Libr Assoc. Apr 1994; 82(2): 140–146.
PMCID: PMC225885

Can primary care physicians' questions be answered using the medical journal literature?

Abstract

Medical librarians and informatics professionals believe the medical journal literature can be useful in clinical practice, but evidence suggests that practicing physicians do not share this belief. The authors designed a study to determine whether a random sample of "native" questions asked by primary care practitioners could be answered using the journal literature. Participants included forty-nine active, nonacademic primary care physicians providing ambulatory care in rural and nonrural Oregon, and seven medical librarians. The study was conducted in three stages: (1) office interviews with physicians to record clinical questions; (2) online searches to locate answers to selected questions; and (3) clinician feedback regarding the relevance and usefulness of the information retrieved. Of 295 questions recorded during forty-nine interviews, 60 questions were selected at random for searches. The average total time spent searching for and selecting articles for each question was forty-three minutes. The average cost per question searched was $27.37. Clinician feedback was received for 48 of 56 questions (four physicians could not be located, so their questions were not used in tabulating the results). For 28 questions (56%), clinicians judged the material relevant; for 22 questions (46%) the information provided a "clear answer" to their question. They expected the information would have had an impact on their patient in nineteen (40%) cases, and an impact on themselves or their practice in twenty-four (51%) cases. If the results can be generalized, and if the time and cost of performing searches can be reduced, increased use of the journal literature could significantly improve the extent to which primary care physicians' information needs are met.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (1.1M), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Huth EJ. The underused medical literature. Ann Intern Med. 1989 Jan 15;110(2):99–100. [PubMed]
  • Evidence-based medicine. A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA. 1992 Nov 4;268(17):2420–2425. [PubMed]
  • Poisson EH. End-user searching in medicine. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1986 Oct;74(4):293–299. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Williamson JW, German PS, Weiss R, Skinner EA, Bowes F., 3rd Health science information management and continuing education of physicians. A survey of U.S. primary care practitioners and their opinion leaders. Ann Intern Med. 1989 Jan 15;110(2):151–160. [PubMed]
  • Covell DG, Uman GC, Manning PR. Information needs in office practice: are they being met? Ann Intern Med. 1985 Oct;103(4):596–599. [PubMed]
  • Connelly DP, Rich EC, Curley SP, Kelly JT. Knowledge resource preferences of family physicians. J Fam Pract. 1990 Mar;30(3):353–359. [PubMed]
  • Timpka T, Ekström M, Bjurulf P. Information needs and information seeking behaviour in primary health care. Scand J Prim Health Care. 1989 Jun;7(2):105–109. [PubMed]
  • Gruppen LD. Physician information seeking: improving relevance through research. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1990 Apr;78(2):165–172. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Stinson ER, Mueller DA. Survey of health professionals' information habits and needs. Conducted through personal interviews. JAMA. 1980 Jan 11;243(2):140–143. [PubMed]
  • Haynes RB, McKibbon KA, Walker CJ, Ryan N, Fitzgerald D, Ramsden MF. Online access to MEDLINE in clinical settings. A study of use and usefulness. Ann Intern Med. 1990 Jan 1;112(1):78–84. [PubMed]
  • McKibbon KA, Haynes RB, Dilks CJ, Ramsden MF, Ryan NC, Baker L, Flemming T, Fitzgerald D. How good are clinical MEDLINE searches? A comparative study of clinical end-user and librarian searches. Comput Biomed Res. 1990 Dec;23(6):583–593. [PubMed]
  • Haynes RB, Ramsden MF, McKibbon KA, Walker CJ. Online access to MEDLINE in clinical settings: impact of user fees. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1991 Oct;79(4):377–381. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Greer AL. The two cultures of biomedicine: can there be consensus? JAMA. 1987 Nov 20;258(19):2739–2740. [PubMed]
  • Kuller AB, Wessel CB, Ginn DS, Martin TP. Quality filtering of the clinical literature by librarians and physicians. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1993 Jan;81(1):38–43. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from Bulletin of the Medical Library Association are provided here courtesy of Medical Library Association

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

  • Cited in Books
    Cited in Books
    PubMed Central articles cited in books
  • PubMed
    PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...