![]() | ![]() |
Formats: |
||||
Oral biofilms, periodontitis, and pulmonary infections 1Institute of Dentistry, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland 2Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland 3Department of Oral Biology, School of Dental Medicine, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA Correspondence: Susanna Paju, Institute of Dentistry, PO Box 63, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland. Tel / fax: +358 919125194, E-mail: susanna.paju/at/helsinki.fi Abstract Bacteria from the oral biofilms may be aspirated into the respiratory tract to influence the initiation and progression of systemic infectious conditions such as pneumonia. Oral bacteria, poor oral hygiene, and periodontitis seem to influence the incidence of pulmonary infections, especially nosocomial pneumonia episodes in high-risk subjects. Improved oral hygiene has been shown to reduce the occurrence of nosocomial pneumonia, both in mechanically-ventilated hospital patients and non-ventilated nursing home residents. It appears that oral colonization by potential respiratory pathogens, possibly fostered by periodontitis, and possibly by bacteria specific to the oral cavity or to periodontal diseases contribute to pulmonary infections. Thus, oral hygiene will assume an even more important role in the care of high-risk subjects – patients in the hospital intensive care and the elderly. The present paper critically reviews the recent literature on the effect of oral biofilms and periodontitis on pneumonia. Keywords: infectious diseases, oral hygiene, pathogenesis, periodontitis, pneumonia Pneumonia is an infection of the lungs caused by bacteria, mycoplasma, viruses, fungi, or parasites. Bacterial pneumonia is a common and significant cause of mortality and morbidity in human populations. Pneumonia together with influenza is a top ten cause of death in the world, and in elderly nursing home residents the leading cause of death. Pneumonia also results in morbidity and considerable decline in the individual quality of life as well as in increased medical care costs for the healthcare system. Bacterial pneumonia includes community-acquired pneumonia and hospital-acquired (nosocomial) pneumonia. Nosocomial pneumonia, occurring >48–72 h after admission to a hospital or nursing home, can be divided into two subtypes: ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and non-VAP. Pneumonia accounts for 10% of infections in intensive care units (ICU) being the most common infection in this hospital setting (Vincent et al, 1995). The onset of pneumonia can easily double the length of the patient’s hospital stay, and the cost of VAP treatment has been estimated to average as high as $40 000 per patient (Rello et al, 2002). Pneumonia is also prevalent in nursing homes, comprising 13–48% of all infections (Crossley and Thurn, 1989). The mortality rate of nosocomial pneumonia can be as high as 25%. The oral cavity may be an important source of bacteria that cause infections of the lungs. Dental plaque, a tooth-borne biofilm that initiates periodontal disease and dental caries may also influence the initiation and progression of pneumonia because of relocalization of the bacteria from the biofilm into the respiratory tract. Bacteria causing community-acquired pneumonia are typically species that normally colonize the oropharynx such as Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Nosocomial pneumonia is, in contrast, often caused by bacteria that are not common members of the oropharyngeal flora such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and enteric Gram-negative bacteria. These organisms populate the oral cavity in certain settings, for example in institutionalized subjects and in people living in areas served by unsanitary water supplies (Scannapieco, 1999). Respiratory pathogens, such as S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, and Escherichia coli, have been found to be present in substantial numbers on the teeth in both institutionalized elders (Russell et al, 1999) and intensive care patients (Scannapieco et al, 1992). In this review we concentrate on the possible effect of oral biofilms and periodontitis on pneumonia. Mechanisms behind the association between oral bacteria/periodontitis and pneumonia One cubic millimeter of dental plaque contains about 100 million bacteria (Thoden van Velzen et al, 1984) and may serve as a persistent reservoir for potential pathogens, both oral and respiratory bacteria. It is likely that oral and respiratory bacteria in the dental plaque are shed into the saliva and are then aspirated into the lower respiratory tract and the lungs to cause infection (Scannapieco, 1999; Scannapieco et al, 2001). Cytokines and enzymes induced from the periodontally inflamed tissues by the oral biofilm may also be transferred into the lungs where they may stimulate local inflammatory processes preceding colonization of pathogens and the actual lung infection (Scannapieco, 1999; Scannapieco et al, 2001). Other possible mechanisms of pulmonary infection are inhalation of airborne pathogens or translocation of bacteria from local infections via bacteremia. In a healthy subject, the respiratory tract is able to defend against aspirated bacteria. Patients with diminished salivary flow, decreased cough reflex, swallowing disorders, poor ability to perform good oral hygiene, or other physical disabilities have a high risk for pulmonary infections. Mechanically ventilated patients in ICUs with no ability to clear oral secretions by swallowing or by coughing, are at risk for VAP especially if the ventilation lasts for more than 48 h (Estes and Meduri, 1995). Oral bacterial load increases during intubation and higher dental plaque scores predict risk of pneumonia (Munro et al, 2006). Anaerobic bacteria are frequently found to colonize the lower respiratory tract in mechanically-ventilated patients (Estes and Meduri, 1995; Robert et al, 2003). Colonization of bacteria in the digestive tract has been suggested to be a source for nosocomial pneumonia, but recently oral and dental bacterial colonization has been proposed to be the major source of bacteria implicated in the etiology of VAP (Garcia, 2005). In the institutionalized elderly the aspiration of saliva seems to be the main route of bacteria into the lungs causing aspiration pneumonia. Dysphagia seems to be an important risk factor, even a predictor, for aspiration pneumonia (Langmore et al, 1998). The major oral and dental risk factors for aspiration pneumonia in veteran residents of nursing homes were number of decayed teeth, periodontitis, oral S. aureus colonization, and requirement of help feeding (Terpenning et al, 2001). Inadequate oral care and swallowing diffculties were associated with pneumonia in 613 elderly nursing home patients (Quagliarello et al, 2005). Studies on the relationship between the oral microflora /periodontitis and pneumonia Very little data on the relationship of oral microflora to community-acquired pneumonia are available. Most of the studies have been conducted in populations with a high prevalence of pneumonia, such as hospitalized patients and the elderly in nursing homes. An epidemiologic study found no association between periodontal state or poor oral hygiene and acute respiratory disease in the community-dwelling population (Scannapieco et al, 1998), but ample evidence exists to support a role for oral bacteria and/or poor oral health in the pathogenesis of nosocomial pneumonia. Poor oral health, dental plaque, or oropharyngeal bacterial colonization have been associated with the occurrence of pneumonia in hospitalized or ICU patients (Scannapieco et al, 1992; Bonten et al, 1996; Garrouste-Orgeas et al, 1997; Fourrier et al, 1998; Preston et al, 1999; El-Solh et al, 2004), but a clear relationship between periodontitis and pneumonia has not always been found (Chabrand et al, 1986; Treloar and Stechmiller, 1995). Higher plaque scores, bacterial presence in saliva, or colonization in the oropharynx seem to be associated with pneumonia in elderly nursing home patients (Mojon et al, 1997; Langmore et al, 1998; Russell et al, 1999; Terpenning et al, 2001). Recent systematic reviews of the literature substantiate the link between poor oral health and pneumonia (Scannapieco et al, 2003; Azarpazhooh and Leake, 2006), but more studies on the possible role of periodontitis are needed. Dentate status may be a risk for pneumonia and respiratory tract infections – patients with natural teeth developed aspiration pneumonia more often than edentulous subjects (Terpenning et al, 1993; Mojon et al, 1997). Cariogenic bacteria and periodontal pathogens in saliva or dental plaque are found to be risk factors for aspiration pneumonia in nursing home patients (Langmore et al, 1998; Terpenning et al, 2001). It is well known that the teeth and gingival margin are places that favour bacterial colonization, and periodontal pockets may serve as reservoirs for potential pathogens for pneumonia. Previous studies have shown that enteric bacteria colonize periodontal pockets (Slots et al, 1988; Rams et al, 1990). Periodontitis together with poor oral hygiene or by facilitating colonization of dental plaque may promote pneumonia. Intervention studies on the role of improved oral cleaning in reducing pneumonia Oral interventions to reduce pulmonary infections have been examined in both mechanically ventilated ICU patients and non-ventilated elderly patients. These studies included chemical intervention using topical antimicrobial agents and traditional oral mechanical hygiene performed by a professional. Hospitalized ICU patients seem to benefit from daily oral cleansing. Studies have shown that the use of oral topical chlorhexidine (CHX) reduces pneumonia in mechanically ventilated patients and may even decrease the need of systemic IV antibiotics or shorten the duration of mechanical ventilation in the ICU (DeRiso et al, 1996; Fourrier et al, 2000; Genuit et al, 2001; Koeman et al, 2006). Moreover, oral application of CHX in the early post-intubation period lowers the numbers of cultivable oral bacteria and may delay the development of VAP (Grap et al, 2004). Studies validating the effectiveness of oral CHX on reducing pneumonia are not unanimous. For example, Fourrier et al found that gingival decontamination with CHX gel significantly decreased the oropharyngeal colonization by bacteria in ventilated patients, but was not sufficient to reduce the incidence of respiratory infections (Fourrier et al, 2005). Another study by Houston et al (2002) reported that a significant reduction in pneumonia using CHX rinse in ICU patients was achieved only after 24 h of intubation. However, the efficacy of oral CHX decontamination to reduce VAP needs further investigation as no clear reduction in mortality rate has been shown. In addition to CHX, other anti-plaque agents have been investigated. The use of antimicrobial gels including polymyxin B sulfate, neomycin sulfate, and vancomycin hydrochloride (Pugin et al, 1991) or gentamicin/colistin/vancomycin (Bergmans et al, 2001) have also been shown to reduce VAP. Recently, the first study showing that mechanical oral care in combination with povidone iodine significantly decreases pneumonia in ventilated ICU patients was published (Mori et al, 2006). This suggests that tooth brushing combined with a topical antimicrobial agent is a promising method for oral cleansing of mechanically ventilated patients. Institutionalized but non-ventilated patients, mainly elders living in nursing homes, appear to benefit from improved oral care by showing lower levels of oral bacteria and fewer pneumonia episodes and febrile days. Daily tooth brushing and topical oral swabbing with povidone iodine significantly decreased pneumonia in residents in long-term care facilities (Yoneyama et al, 1999, 2002; Yoshida et al, 2001). However, in an earlier study by the same research group, oral care with both brushing and antimicrobial gargling had an effect only on febrile days but not on the incidence of pneumonia (Yoneyama et al, 1996). Interestingly, professional cleaning by a dental hygienist once a week significantly reduced the prevalence of fever and fatal pneumonia in 141 elderly patients in nursing homes (Adachi et al, 2002). Similar once-a-week professional oral cleaning significantly reduced influenza infections in an elderly population (Abe et al, 2006). Dental plaque is known to form clearly visible masses in the teeth in a few days, but these studies suggest that improved oral care even without chemical agents and even if not performed daily not only reduces the oral bacterial, viral, and fungal load, but may have an effect on reducing the risk of pneumonia. Therefore, more studies are needed to find the easiest oral decontamination methods to reduce pulmonary infections in elderly nursing home patients. Our previously published systematic literature review revealed that interventions improving oral hygiene by mechanical and/or topical chemical disinfection or antibiotics reduce the incidence of hospital-acquired pneumonia by an average of 40% (Scannapieco et al, 2003). Oral cleansing reduces pneumonia in both edentulous and dentate subjects, suggesting that oral colonization of bacteria contributes to nosocomial pneumonia to a greater extent than periodontitis. However, intervention studies on the treatment of periodontitis on the incidence of pneumonia have not been performed due to the complexities required in investigating ICU or bed-bound nursing home patients. In edentulous people, dentures may easily serve as a similar reservoir as teeth for oral and respiratory bacteria if not cleaned properly and daily. Conclusions and future visions Poor oral health, dependence on help conducting daily oral hygiene, oral colonization of periodontal and respiratory pathogens, all possibly influenced by periodontitis, are associated with nosocomial pneumonia. A direct causal relationship between periodontitis and pneumonia has not been established, however. Based on the studies reviewed here it seems that oral colonization by potential respiratory pathogens contributes to pulmonary infections. The specific contribution of periodontitis per se to pneumonia risk is presently unknown. It will be difficult to determine whether periodontitis is related to pneumonia in ICU subjects, for example, due to the limited access to these patients’ oral cavity, and the rapid turnover of patients in the hospital that presents logistical challenges to such research. Thus, oral hygiene of both dentate and edentulous subjects will assume an even more important role in elder care. Chronic periodontal infections are common – the prevalence of severe periodontitis in Western countries has been estimated to be 5–15%. Pneumonia and other respiratory infections are common in community-dwelling populations but especially in high-risk subjects such as mechanically-ventilated ICU patients and residents in long-term care facilities. With improved oral hygiene and preventative approaches to dental care, people are able to keep their natural teeth longer, even for life. Edentulousness will someday be a rare phenomenon; in the future there will be more elderly dentate people, having more teeth than ever, but who will also have impaired ability to perform oral hygiene, and hence more cases of periodontal diseases. To assure that improved knowledge and methods to save people’s natural teeth are not taking us from one problem to another, emphasis on the importance of good oral hygiene and periodontal treatment, especially in subjects who are in high risk for pulmonary infections, is crucial. Acknowledgments The authors are supported by grants 209152 and 211117 (SP) from the Academy of Finland and DE014685 (FAS) from the National Institutes of Health (USA). References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||
JAMA. 1995 Aug 23-30; 274(8):639-44.
[JAMA. 1995]Chest. 2002 Dec; 122(6):2115-21.
[Chest. 2002]Semin Respir Infect. 1989 Mar; 4(1):64-72.
[Semin Respir Infect. 1989]J Periodontol. 1999 Jul; 70(7):793-802.
[J Periodontol. 1999]Spec Care Dentist. 1999 May-Jun; 19(3):128-34.
[Spec Care Dentist. 1999]J Clin Periodontol. 1984 Apr; 11(4):209-20.
[J Clin Periodontol. 1984]J Periodontol. 1999 Jul; 70(7):793-802.
[J Periodontol. 1999]Ann Periodontol. 2001 Dec; 6(1):78-86.
[Ann Periodontol. 2001]Intensive Care Med. 1995 Apr; 21(4):365-83.
[Intensive Care Med. 1995]Am J Crit Care. 2006 Sep; 15(5):453-60.
[Am J Crit Care. 2006]Intensive Care Med. 2003 Jul; 29(7):1062-8.
[Intensive Care Med. 2003]Am J Infect Control. 2005 Nov; 33(9):527-41.
[Am J Infect Control. 2005]Dysphagia. 1998 Spring; 13(2):69-81.
[Dysphagia. 1998]J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001 May; 49(5):557-63.
[J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001]Clin Infect Dis. 2005 Jan 1; 40(1):1-6.
[Clin Infect Dis. 2005]Crit Care Med. 1992 Jun; 20(6):740-5.
[Crit Care Med. 1992]Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996 Nov; 154(5):1339-46.
[Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996]Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997 Nov; 156(5):1647-55.
[Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997]Crit Care Med. 1998 Feb; 26(2):301-8.
[Crit Care Med. 1998]Gerontology. 1999 Jan-Feb; 45(1):49-52.
[Gerontology. 1999]Ann Periodontol. 2003 Dec; 8(1):54-69.
[Ann Periodontol. 2003]J Periodontol. 2006 Sep; 77(9):1465-82.
[J Periodontol. 2006]Clin Infect Dis. 1993 Jun; 16 Suppl 4():S314-6.
[Clin Infect Dis. 1993]Gerodontology. 1997 Jul; 14(1):9-16.
[Gerodontology. 1997]Dysphagia. 1998 Spring; 13(2):69-81.
[Dysphagia. 1998]Chest. 1996 Jun; 109(6):1556-61.
[Chest. 1996]Intensive Care Med. 2000 Sep; 26(9):1239-47.
[Intensive Care Med. 2000]Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2001 Spring; 2(1):5-18.
[Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2001]Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006 Jun 15; 173(12):1348-55.
[Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006]Heart Lung. 2004 Mar-Apr; 33(2):83-91.
[Heart Lung. 2004]Lancet. 1999 Aug 7; 354(9177):515.
[Lancet. 1999]J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002 Mar; 50(3):430-3.
[J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002]Nippon Ronen Igakkai Zasshi. 2001 Jul; 38(4):481-3.
[Nippon Ronen Igakkai Zasshi. 2001]Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 1996 Jan-Feb; 22(1):11-9.
[Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 1996]Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2002 Aug; 94(2):191-5.
[Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2002]Ann Periodontol. 2003 Dec; 8(1):54-69.
[Ann Periodontol. 2003]