![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2008 The American Society of Human Genetics. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All right reserved.. X-Linked Dominant Scapuloperoneal Myopathy Is Due to a Mutation in the Gene Encoding Four-and-a-Half-LIM Protein 1 1Department of Neurology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA 2Wellspan Neurology, York, PA 17402, USA 3Department of Pathology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA 4New Jersey Neuroscience Institute, Edison, NJ 08818, USA 5Unidad Experimental, Hospital Donostia, San Sebastian 20014, Spain 6Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA Michio Hirano: mh29/at/columbia.edu Corresponding author Email: mh29/at/columbia.eduReceived May 21, 2007; Revised August 30, 2007; Accepted September 11, 2007. This document may be redistributed and reused, subject to certain conditions. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract Scapuloperoneal (SP) syndrome encompasses heterogeneous neuromuscular disorders characterized by weakness in the shoulder-girdle and peroneal muscles. In a large Italian-American pedigree with dominant SP myopathy (SPM) previously linked to chromosome 12q, we have mapped the disease to Xq26, and, in all of the affected individuals, we identified a missense change (c.365G→C) in the FHL1 gene encoding four-and-a-half-LIM protein 1 (FHL1). The mutation substitutes a serine for a conserved trypophan at amino acid 122 in the second LIM domain of the protein. Western blot analyses of muscle extracts revealed FHL1 loss that paralleled disease severity. FHL1 and an isoform, FHL1C, are highly expressed in skeletal muscle and may contribute to stability of sarcomeres and sarcolemma, myofibrillary assembly, and transcriptional regulation. This is the first report, to our knowledge, of X-linked dominant SP myopathy and the first human mutation in FHL1. Main Text Scapuloperoneal syndrome (SPS) was initially described more than 120 years ago by Jules Broussard as “une forme héréditaire d'atrophie musculaire progressive” beginning in the lower legs and affecting the shoulder region earlier and more severely than distal arm;1 however, the etiology of this condition remains unclear. Descriptions of neurogenic SP (MIM 181400) with distal limb sensory loss (Davidenkow syndrome) or without sensory involvement (Kaeser syndrome) as well as SP myopathy (SPM [MIM 181430]) suggest that at least three pathogenically distinct forms exist.2–5 Molecular genetic studies have confirmed the existence of more than one cause of SP syndrome. In 1996, we linked an apparently autosomal-dominant SPM in a large Italian-American family (family C) to chromosome 12q6 whereas an autosomal-dominant neurogenic SP in New England kindred of French-Canadian origin (MIM 181405) was mapped to a second distinct locus on chromosome 12q24.7 In the original family reported by Kaeser, a pathogenic missense mutation (R350P) of the desmin gene (Des [MIM 125660]) was identified,4,8 and in two of 17 patients with scapuloperoneal myopathy, a missense mutation (R1845W) in the MYH7 gene encoding myosin heavy chain 7 (MIM 160760) was observed.9 In family C, 14 of 44 members were definitely affected by SPM and two other deceased individuals were probably affected based on clinical history.6 The diagnosis of SPS was based on clinical features including footdrop as an “invariable early sign,” proximal arm weakness always preceding hand weakness, and scapular winging on examination of all patients. Elevated serum creatine kinase (CK) levels in all patients, normal nerve conduction studies with electromyographic myogenic changes, and muscle biopsies in four patients revealing typical myopathic changes indicated that myopathy was the cause of weakness. Detailed analysis of two muscle biopsy samples revealed desmin-positive cytoplasmic bodies indicative of a myofibrillary myopathy. The prior linkage study mapped the disease to chromosome 12q between markers 12S88 (94.49 cM) and 12S306 (105.18) based on a maximum 2-point LOD score of 2.95 (marker D12S82 at recombinant fraction [θ] = 0) and peak multipoint LOD score of 3.0. However, 10 individuals who were “not affected” shared the chromosome 12q haplotype with the affected individuals suggesting incomplete penetrance, double recombination in these nonaffected individuals, or false-positive linkage. Therefore, we performed a new genome-wide scan with microsatellite markers to identify the chromosomal locus of the disease. Sex chromosome markers were included because X-linked dominant inheritance could not be excluded by male-to-male transmission. In this study, we re-evaluated 27 adult members of family C (Figure 1
We performed molecular genetic linkage studies with leukocyte DNA from 27 family members (14 affected and 13 unaffected individuals). Three unaffected female individuals allowed us to analyze their DNA but refused publication of their genetic information; therefore, their haplotypes are not included in the pedigree (Figure 1 We screened three candidate genes for mutations: MBNL3 (MIM 300413), ZNF75 (MIM 314997), and FHL1 (MIM 300163). To sequence FHL1, we designed 11 primer pairs flanking the exons, the promoter region, and the 5′ and 3′ untranslated region. Sequencing was performed with BigDye 3.1 with an ABI 3100 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems). Screening of 181 healthy individuals for the G-to-C transition at nucleotide 365 of FHL1 was performed by restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis with BsmBI restriction endonuclease digestion of PCR-amplified DNA fragments. Western blot studies were performed with rabbit polyclonal antibody anti-FHL1 (AVIVA Systems Biology) at a dilution of 1:1000 and with mouse monoclonal anti-vinculin antibody (Sigma) at a dilution of 1:5000. After washing, the membranes were incubated with the corresponding anti-rabbit or anti-mouse IgG secondary antibodies (Dako) at a dilution of 1:1000 for 45 min at room temperature. The membranes were developed with the chemiluminescence ECL system (Pharmacia) followed by exposure of the membranes to autoradiographic films. Quantitation of immunoreactive bands was performed by densitometric analysis with the NIH Scion Image software package (version 1.61). To generate a model of W122S mutant FHL1, we used the coordinates of PDB entry 1X63 and replaced tryptophan 122 with a serine residue via a common rotamer with the program COOT. The molecular surface was generated with the program GRASP, and figures were generated with the program PYMOL. Only three microsatellite markers produced LOD scores ≥ 1.0: TPO (chromosome 2p25), D12S1294 (12q15), and ATCT003 (Xq26) (see Table S1 available online). We disproved the prior linkage to chromosome 12q because one affected individual (III-27), who was “not affected” in the prior study, did not share the haplotype with her affected relatives. We also excluded linkage to the desmin gene locus at chromosome 2q35. We tested additional microsatellite markers at chromosome Xq26. Recombinations detected with markers GATA16B12P and DXS2390 restricted the SPM locus to a 19 megabase interval with a maximum two-point LOD score of 3.66 at θ = 0 with marker ATCT003 (Table 1). Although the critical region was large, we identified three candidate genes, which encode proteins highly expressed in muscle and are involved in muscle sarcomeric organization or muscle differentiation: MBNL3, ZNF75, and FHL1. Direct DNA sequencing of MBNL3 and ZNF75 did not reveal any potential mutations; however, in FHL1, we identified a G-to-C transition at nucleotide 365 in exon 3 (c.365G→C) that changes a tryptophan in position 122 to serine (W122S). The skeletal muscle LIM protein 1, FHL1 or SLIM1, is a member of the four-and-a-half-LIM (FHL) domain protein family.10–12 LIM is an acronym of the three transcription factors Lin-11, Isl-1, and Mec-3 in which the cysteine-rich double zinc finger motif (CX2CX17-19HS2C)X2(CX2CX16-20CX2(H/D/C) was originally identified.13 The W122S mutation alters a conserved residue in the second LIM domain of the protein (Figure 2
The mutation was hemizygous in all the affected males and heterozygous in all affected females. Affected men had earlier age at onset (26.1 ± 4.7 years, mean ± standard deviation; n = 8) than women (34.4 ± 11.9 years; n = 8) (p = 0.04, t test). In addition, men were more severely affected than women: 7 of 8 men became wheelchair bound earlier (age 35.9 ± 4.0 years) and only one was walking with a cane at age 63, whereas only 4 of 8 women became wheelchair bound later (age 54.8 ± 19) and four were ambulating at ages 33–74. Two unaffected females (III-21 and an individual who requested to be anonymous) carry the mutation, but because both are <58 years old, the oldest age at onset among definitely affected individuals, they are presumed to be presymptomatic. We did not detect the mutation in 181 unrelated and unaffected Italian-American individuals, 54 females and 127 males (235 X chromosomes); 40 individuals were of Italian origin. We also excluded FHL1 mutations in 10 unrelated patients with myofibrillar myopathy and 5 unrelated probands with the clinical diagnosis of SP syndrome. We performed western blot analyses to quantitate levels of FHL1 and vinculin (a sarcolemmal protein) with quadriceps muscle from two affected men (III-24 and IV-18), two affected women (III-14 and III-32), and two controls (Figure 3
To confirm that loss of protein was disease specific, western blot analyses of FHL1 and vinculin were performed with extracts of muscles from two patients with cytoplasmic body myopathy, two patients with myofibrillar myopathy not caused by mutations in FHL1, and two controls. The ratios of FHL1/vinculin were comparable in all muscle samples (controls, 1 and 1.15; cytoplasmic body myopathies, 1.17 and 0.9; and myofibrillar myopathies, 0.7 and 0.73). Trytophan at amino acid 122 of FHL1 is conserved in all four LIM domains of FHL1 and in the consensus LIM motif (Figure 4
The LIM motif mediates protein-protein interactions with transcription factors, cell-signaling molecules, and cytoskeleton-associated proteins.15 The FHL family includes FHL1, FHL2, FHL3, FHL4, and ACT in humans. Whereas expression of FHL4 and ACT is restricted to testis, FHL1, FHL2, and FHL3 are mainly expressed in muscle. FHL2 and FHL3 also contribute to the mechanical stabilization of muscle cells.16 FHL1 is the least characterized of the FHL proteins; it contains an N-terminal single zinc finger followed by four LIM domains, which are separated by eight intervening amino acids. FHL1 is highly expressed in adult human skeletal muscle, moderately in heart, and weakly in placenta, ovary, prostate, testis, small intestine, colon, and spleen.10–12 In cultured C2C12 skeletal muscle cell lines, levels of FHL1 and FHL3 transcripts appear to be coordinated with expression of myogenic factors including MyoD, MRF4, and myogenin, suggesting that FHL1 and FHL3 participate in myogenesis.17 FHL1 may contribute to muscle cytoarchitecture by interacting with myosin-binding protein C (MyBP-C) and has been localized to the I-band and M-line of sarcomeres as well as to sarcolemma, where it colocalizes with MyBP-C.18 RNAi knockdown of FHL1 in C2C12 cells impaired myosin thick filament formation and reduced MyBP-C incorporation into sarcomeres, indicating that FHL1 is required for sarcomere assembly.18 In addition, FHL1 may have a role in α5β1-integrin-dependent myocyte elongation, adhesion, spreading, and migration.19,20 Two additional transcripts of the FHL1 gene have been described: FHL1B (SLIMMER) and FHL1C (KyoT2).21–23 FHL1B is expressed mainly in brain whereas FHL1C is primarily in skeletal muscle. All three transcripts share exons 1–3, which encode the N-terminal single zinc finger and two LIM domains. Isoforms FHL1B and 1C lack exon 4 (encoding two LIM domains of FHL1) and contain a C-terminal putative binding domain for J-recombination signal protein (RBP-J),21–23 a transcription factor required for development and negatively regulated by KyoT2 in mice;24,25 therefore, human FHL1C may modulate muscle transcription by repressing RBP-J transcription. Based on the putative functions of FHL1 and FLH1C proteins in skeletal muscle, we hypothesize that the W122S mutation causes focal myofibrillary disarray though possible disruption of stability of sarcomeres and sarcolemma, myofibrillary assembly, transcriptional regulation, or a combination of these functions. The identification of FHL1, MHC7, and Des mutations in patients with scapuloperoneal myopathy suggests that myofibrillary disarray may be a common feature of SP syndrome.8,9 Further studies are needed to elucidate the role of FHL1 in skeletal muscle and the pathomechanism of FHL1 in this novel X-linked dominant myopathy. Web Resources The URLs for data presented herein are as follows:
One supplemental table can be found with this article online at http://www.ajhg.org/cgi/content/full/82/1/208/DC1/. Supplemental Data Document S1. One Table Click here to view.(26K, pdf) Acknowledgments We are grateful to all of the patients and relatives for their collaboration. We appreciate Dr. Osvaldo Graña (Structural Computational Biology Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre, Madrid, Spain) for assistance. This work was partially supported by the CFSR Foundation. The authors are supported by grants from Telethon Italy, the Muscular Dystrophy Association, National Institutes of Health (NS11766), and the Marriott Mitochondrial Disorder Clinical Research Fund (MMDCRF). References 1. Broussard J. Steinheil; Paris: 1886. Étude clinique sur une forme hérèditaire d'atrophie musculaire progressive débutant par les membres inférieurs (type fémoral avec griffe desl orteils). PhD thesis. 2. Davidenkow S. Scapuloperoneal amyotrophy. Arch. Neurol. Psychiatry. 1939;41:694–701. 3. Hausmanowa-Petrusewicz I., Zielinska S. Zur nosologiscen stellung des scapulo-peronealen syndroms. Dtsch. Z. Nervenheilkd. 1962;183:377–382. [PubMed] 4. Kaeser H.E. Scapuloperoneal muscular atrophy. Brain. 1965;88:407–418. [PubMed] 5. Steidl L., Urbanek K. The dystrophic type of scapuloperoneal syndrome. Cesk. Neurol. 1973;36:147–150. [PubMed] 6. Wilhelmsen K.C., Blake D.M., Lynch T., Mabutas J., De Vera M., Neystat M., Bernstein M., Hirano M., Gilliam T.C., Murphy P.L. Chromosome 12-linked autosomal dominant scapuloperoneal muscular dystrophy. Ann. Neurol. 1996;39:507–520. [PubMed] 7. Isozumi K., DeLong R., Kaplan J., Deng H.X., Iqbal Z., Hung W.Y., Wilhelmsen K.C., Hentati A., Pericak-Vance M.A., Siddique T. Linkage of scapuloperoneal spinal muscular atrophy to chromosome 12q24.1-q24.31. Hum. Mol. Genet. 1996;5:1377–1382. [PubMed] 8. Walter M.C., Reilich P., Huebner A., Fischer D., Schroder R., Vorgerd M., Kress W., Born C., Schoser B.G., Krause K.H. Scapuloperoneal syndrome type Kaeser and a wide phenotypic spectrum of adult-onset, dominant myopathies are associated with the desmin mutation R350P. Brain. 2007;130:1485–1496. [PubMed] 9. Pegoraro E., Gavassini B.F., Borsato C., Melacini P., Vianello A., Stramare R., Cenacchi G., Angelini C. MYH7 gene mutation in myosin storage myopathy and scapulo-peroneal myopathy. Neuromuscul. Disord. 2007;17:321–329. [PubMed] 10. Greene W.K., Baker E., Rabbitts T.H., Kees U.R. Genomic structure, tissue expression and chromosomal location of the LIM-only gene, SLIM1. Gene. 1999;232:203–207. [PubMed] 11. Lee S.M., Tsui S.K., Chan K.K., Garcia-Barcelo M., Waye M.M., Fung K.P., Liew C.C., Lee C.Y. Chromosomal mapping, tissue distribution and cDNA sequence of four-and-a-half LIM domain protein 1 (FHL1). Gene. 1998;216:163–170. [PubMed] 12. Morgan M.J., Madgwick A.J. Slim defines a novel family of LIM-proteins expressed in skeletal muscle. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1996;225:632–638. [PubMed] 13. Freyd G., Kim S.K., Horvitz H.R. Novel cysteine-rich motif and homeodomain in the product of the Caenorhabditis elegans cell lineage gene lin-11. Nature. 1990;344:876–879. [PubMed] 14. Goldberg A.L. Protein degradation and protection against misfolded or damaged proteins. Nature. 2003;426:895–899. [PubMed] 15. Kadrmas J.L., Beckerle M.C. The LIM domain: from the cytoskeleton to the nucleus. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2004;5:920–931. [PubMed] 16. Johannessen M., Moller S., Hansen T., Moens U., Van Ghelue M. The multifunctional roles of the four-and-a-half-LIM only protein FHL2. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2006;63:268–284. [PubMed] 17. Morgan M.J., Madgwick A.J. The LIM proteins FHL1 and FHL3 are expressed differently in skeletal muscle. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1999;255:245–250. [PubMed] 18. McGrath M.J., Cottle D.L., Nguyen M.A., Dyson J.M., Coghill I.D., Robinson P.A., Holdsworth M., Cowling B.S., Hardeman E.C., Mitchell C.A., Brown S. Four and a half LIM protein 1 binds myosin-binding protein C and regulates myosin filament formation and sarcomere assembly. J. Biol. Chem. 2006;281:7666–7683. [PubMed] 19. McGrath M.J., Mitchell C.A., Coghill I.D., Robinson P.A., Brown S. Skeletal muscle LIM protein 1 (SLIM1/FHL1) induces alpha 5 beta 1-integrin-dependent myocyte elongation. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2003;285:C1513–C1526. [PubMed] 20. Robinson P.A., Brown S., McGrath M.J., Coghill I.D., Gurung R., Mitchell C.A. Skeletal muscle LIM protein 1 regulates integrin-mediated myoblast adhesion, spreading, and migration. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2003;284:C681–C695. [PubMed] 21. Lee S.M., Li H.Y., Ng E.K., Or S.M., Chan K.K., Kotaka M., Chim S.S., Tsui S.K., Waye M.M., Fung K.P., Lee C.Y. Characterization of a brain-specific nuclear LIM domain protein (FHL1B) which is an alternatively spliced variant of FHL1. Gene. 1999;237:253–263. [PubMed] 22. Ng E.K., Lee S.M., Li H.Y., Ngai S.M., Tsui S.K., Waye M.M., Lee C.Y., Fung K.P. Characterization of tissue-specific LIM domain protein (FHL1C) which is an alternatively spliced isoform of a human LIM-only protein (FHL1). J. Cell. Biochem. 2001;82:1–10. [PubMed] 23. Brown S., McGrath M.J., Ooms L.M., Gurung R., Maimone M.M., Mitchell C.A. Characterization of two isoforms of the skeletal muscle LIM protein 1, SLIM1. Localization of SLIM1 at focal adhesions and the isoform slimmer in the nucleus of myoblasts and cytoplasm of myotubes suggests distinct roles in the cytoskeleton and in nuclear-cytoplasmic communication. J. Biol. Chem. 1999;274:27083–27091. [PubMed] 24. Oka C., Nakano T., Wakeham A., de la Pompa J.L., Mori C., Sakai T., Okazaki S., Kawaichi M., Shiota K., Mak T.W., Honjo T. Disruption of the mouse RBP-J κ gene results in early embryonic death. Development. 1995;121:3291–3301. [PubMed] 25. Taniguchi Y., Furukawa T., Tun T., Han H., Honjo T. LIM protein KyoT2 negatively regulates transcription by association with the RBP-J DNA-binding protein. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1998;18:644–654. [PubMed] 26. Nicholls A., Sharp K.A., Honig B. Protein folding and association: insights from the interfacial and thermodynamic properties of hydrocarbons. Proteins. 1991;11:281–296. [PubMed] |
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||
Dtsch Z Nervenheilkd. 1962; 183():377-82.
[Dtsch Z Nervenheilkd. 1962]Brain. 1965 Jun; 88(2):407-18.
[Brain. 1965]Cesk Neurol. 1973 May; 36(3):147-50.
[Cesk Neurol. 1973]Ann Neurol. 1996 Apr; 39(4):507-20.
[Ann Neurol. 1996]Hum Mol Genet. 1996 Sep; 5(9):1377-82.
[Hum Mol Genet. 1996]Ann Neurol. 1996 Apr; 39(4):507-20.
[Ann Neurol. 1996]Ann Neurol. 1996 Apr; 39(4):507-20.
[Ann Neurol. 1996]Gene. 1999 May 31; 232(2):203-7.
[Gene. 1999]Gene. 1998 Aug 17; 216(1):163-70.
[Gene. 1998]Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1996 Aug 14; 225(2):632-8.
[Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1996]Nature. 1990 Apr 26; 344(6269):876-9.
[Nature. 1990]Nature. 2003 Dec 18; 426(6968):895-9.
[Nature. 2003]Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2004 Nov; 5(11):920-31.
[Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2004]Cell Mol Life Sci. 2006 Feb; 63(3):268-84.
[Cell Mol Life Sci. 2006]Gene. 1999 May 31; 232(2):203-7.
[Gene. 1999]Gene. 1998 Aug 17; 216(1):163-70.
[Gene. 1998]Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1996 Aug 14; 225(2):632-8.
[Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1996]Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1999 Feb 16; 255(2):245-50.
[Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1999]J Biol Chem. 2006 Mar 17; 281(11):7666-83.
[J Biol Chem. 2006]Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2003 Dec; 285(6):C1513-26.
[Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2003]Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2003 Mar; 284(3):C681-95.
[Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2003]Gene. 1999 Sep 3; 237(1):253-63.
[Gene. 1999]J Cell Biochem. 2001 Apr 2-27; 82(1):1-10.
[J Cell Biochem. 2001]J Biol Chem. 1999 Sep 17; 274(38):27083-91.
[J Biol Chem. 1999]Development. 1995 Oct; 121(10):3291-301.
[Development. 1995]Mol Cell Biol. 1998 Jan; 18(1):644-54.
[Mol Cell Biol. 1998]Brain. 2007 Jun; 130(Pt 6):1485-96.
[Brain. 2007]Neuromuscul Disord. 2007 Apr; 17(4):321-9.
[Neuromuscul Disord. 2007]Ann Neurol. 1996 Apr; 39(4):507-20.
[Ann Neurol. 1996]Proteins. 1991; 11(4):281-96.
[Proteins. 1991]