![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2008 Shankar et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. Curcumin sensitizes TRAIL-resistant xenografts: molecular mechanisms of apoptosis, metastasis and angiogenesis 1Department of Biochemistry, University of Texas Health Science Center at Tyler, Tyler, Texas, 75703, USA Corresponding author.Sharmila Shankar: sharmila.shankar/at/uthct.edu; Suthakar Ganapathy: suthakar.ganapathy/at/uthct.edu; Qinghe Chen: Qinghe.chen/at/uthct.edu; Rakesh K Srivastava: rakesh.srivastava/at/uthct.edu Received November 21, 2007; Accepted January 29, 2008. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract Background We have recently shown that curcumin (a diferuloylmethane, the yellow pigment in turmeric) enhances apoptosis-inducing potential of TRAIL in prostate cancer PC-3 cells, and sensitizes TRAIL-resistant LNCaP cells in vitro through multiple mechanisms. The objectives of this study were to investigate the molecular mechanisms by which curcumin sensitized TRAIL-resistant LNCaP xenografts in vivo. Methods Prostate cancer TRAIL-resistant LNCaP cells were implanted in Balb c nude mice to examine the effects of curcumin and/or TRAIL on tumor growth and genes related to apoptosis, metastasis and angiogenesis. Results Curcumin inhibited growth of LNCaP xenografts in nude mice by inducing apoptosis (TUNEL staining) and inhibiting proliferation (PCNA and Ki67 staining), and sensitized these tumors to undergo apoptosis by TRAIL. In xenogrfated tumors, curcumin upregulated the expression of TRAIL-R1/DR4, TRAIL-R2/DR5, Bax, Bak, p21/WAF1, and p27/KIP1, and inhibited the activation of NFκB and its gene products such as cyclin D1, VEGF, uPA, MMP-2, MMP-9, Bcl-2 and Bcl-XL. The regulation of death receptors and members of Bcl-2 family, and inactivation of NFκB may sensitize TRAIL-resistant LNCaP xenografts. Curcumin also inhibited number of blood vessels in tumors, and circulating endothelial growth factor receptor 2-positive endothelial cells in mice. Conclusion The ability of curcumin to inhibit tumor growth, metastasis and angiogenesis, and enhance the therapeutic potential of TRAIL suggests that curcumin alone or in combination with TRAIL can be used for prostate cancer prevention and/or therapy. Introduction The process of malignant transformation involves the sequential acquisition of a number of genetic and epigenetic alterations as a result of increasing genomic instability caused by defects in checkpoint controls [1,2]. These alterations allow cancer cells to acquire the capabilities to become self-sufficient in mitogenic signals, deregulate the control of cell cycle, escape from apoptosis, and obtain unlimited replication potential [3-5]. Within a growing tumor mass, the genetic changes during tumor progression also enable cancer cells to gain the ability to induce angiogenesis, invade neighboring tissues, and metastasize to distinct organs [6]. The new chemopreventive agents or therapeutic strategies that inhibit angiogenesis, metastasis and invasion can be considered for future clinical development. Epidemiological data have demonstrated that curcumin is safe, non-toxic, and has long lasting beneficial effects on human health. Curcumin [1,7-bis(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)-1,6-hepatadiene-3,5-dione; diferulolylmethane], a major constituent of the yellow spice turmeric, is derived from the rhizomes of Curcuma spp. [7]. It possesses antitumor, anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant properties [7,8]. In addition, curcumin has been shown to inhibit tumor metastasis, invasion and angiogenesis [9-12]. We have recently shown that Bax and Bak genes completely inhibited curcumin-induced apoptosis in Bax-/- and Bax -/- mouse embryonic fibroblasts [13], and curcumin induced apoptosis in prostate cancer cells by inhibiting Akt activity upstream of mitochondria [14]. These data suggest that curcumin regulates multiple signaling pathways and possesses several therapeutic benefits. Nuclear factor (NFκB) is a dimeric DNA binding protein consisting of members of the NFκB/Rel family [15]. Its expression is ubiquitous in mammalian cells. Normally, NFκB resides in the cytoplasm in an inactive form in association with inhibitory proteins. These inhibitory proteins, which belong to a family of proteins named inhibitor of NFκB [15], prevent NFκB nuclear translocation by masking the NFκB nuclear localization signal and thus, inhibit NFκB DNA binding and transactivational function [15,16]. Various stimuli activate a large number of distinct signaling pathways that eventually result in the phosphorylation of inhibitor of NFκB and its subsequent degradation by the proteasome or its dissociation from NFκB without additional degradation [15-17]. The released NFκB then translocates to the nucleus and binds to κB DNA motifs to initiate gene transcription. The putative target genes of NFκB are involved in immune and inflammatory responses, and in the control of cell proliferation, apoptosis, metastasis and angiogenesis [15,16]. Tumor cells usually express high levels of constitutively active NFκB [16,18]. Furthermore, curcumin inhibited NFκB activity in cancer cells [9,19] and sensitized cancer cells to chemotherapy and radiotherapy [20-25]. TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) binds to TRAIL-R1/DR4 and TRAIL-R2/DR5. TRAIL induces apoptosis in cancer cells of various origins [26-30]. Data on experimental animals and primates led us to believe that TRAIL has great promise as a selective anticancer agent [27,28,31]. We have recently demonstrated that TRAIL induces apoptosis in several prostate cancer cells lines, but it was ineffective in inducing apoptosis in LNCaP cells [27,28,32]. Furthermore, curcumin sensitizes TRAIL-resistant prostate cancer cells to growth inhibition by TRAIL in vitro [33-35]. However, the ability of curcumin to sensitize TRAIL-resistant prostate cancer cells in vivo has not yet been demonstrated. The purpose of our studies was to investigate the molecular mechanisms by which curcumin sensitized TRAIL-resistant prostate cancer cells in vivo. Our results indicated that curcumin inhibited growth, metastasis, and angiogenesis of TRAIL-resistant LNCaP xenografts in nude mice through regulation of NFκB and its gene products, and sensitized these xenografts to TRAIL treatment. Thus, curcumin can be used alone or combined with TRAIL for prostate cancer prevention and/or therapy. Results Curcumin sensitizes TRAIL-resistant tumor cells in vivo We have recently shown that curcumin sensitizes TRAIL-resistant prostate cancer LNCaP cells in vitro [35]. Therefore in the present study, we examined the ability of curcumin to sensitize TRAIL-resistant LNCaP cells in vivo. LNCaP cells were xenografted in Balb c nude mice. After tumor formation, these mice were treated with curcumin, TRAIL, or curcumin plus TRAIL for 6 weeks to examine their effects on tumor growth and markers of proliferation, apoptosis, metastasis, invasion and angiogenesis. While TRAIL was ineffective in inhibiting the tumor growth, curcumin inhibited the growth of LNCaP xenografts in nude mice (Fig. (Fig.1A).1A
Since tumor growth is determined by the balance of cell proliferation and apoptosis, mechanisms that promote cell survival or prevent apoptosis of cancer cells would favor the establishment of tumor colonies. To test this, we examined the extent of cellular apoptosis in those tumors. Examination of tumor tissues by TUNEL assay revealed that curcumin alone induced apoptosis (Fig. (Fig.1B1B In vivo regulation of Bcl-2 family members and death receptors by curcumin and/or TRAIL Since curcumin sensitized TRAIL-resistant cells in vivo, we sought to examine the molecular mechanisms by which curcumin sensitized TRAIL-resistant LNCaP cells. We next examined the effects of curcumin and/or TRAIL on the expression of Bcl-2 family members (Bax, Bak, Bcl-2, and Bcl-XL) and death receptors (TRAIL-R1/DR4 and TRAIL-R2/DR5) by immunohistochemistry in tumor tissues derived from in vivo experiment (Fig. (Fig.2).2
We confirmed the immunohistochemistry data by examining the expression of these proteins by the Western blot analysis (Fig. (Fig.3).3
In vivo regulation of cell cycle inhibitors (p21/WAF1/CIP1 and p27/KIP1) and cyclin D1 by curcumin and/or TRAIL Since curcumin caused growth arrest by inducing expression of cell cycle inhibitors p21/WAF1/CIP1 and p27/KIP1 in vitro, we sought to validate this phenomenon in vivo in xenografted tumors. Treatment of mice with curcumin resulted in the induction of cell cycle inhibitors p21/WAF1/CIP1 and p27/KIP1 and inhibition of cyclin D1 (Fig. (Fig.4A).4A
In vivo regulation of NFκB, Cox-2 and IL-8 by curcumin and/or TRAIL The NFκB family of transcription factors has been shown to be constitutively activated in cancer cells and thus regulates genes involved in cell proliferation, apoptosis, metastasis and angiogenesis [36]. Since NFκB, Cox-2 and IL-8 play major role in cancer cell proliferation, and immune response, we sought to examine the effects of curcumin and/or TRAIL on the expression of these proteins by immunohistochemistry in tumor tissues derived from xenograft experiment (Fig. (Fig.5A).5A
We next confirmed the immunohistochemistry data by examining the expression of these proteins by the Western blot analysis (Fig. (Fig.5B).5B Since curcumin inhibited the phosphorylation of p65 subunit of NFκB, we next measured the NFκB-DNA binding activity in tumor tissues derived from control, TRAIL, curcumin, and curcumin plus TRAIL treated groups. Nuclear extracts were prepared from tumor tissues derived from different treatment groups, and NFκB-DNA binding activity was measured by gelshift assay (Fig. (Fig.5C).5C In vivo regulation of angiogenesis by curcumin and/or TRAIL Whether regression in tumor growth by curcumin was due to inhibition of angiogenesis, we analyzed the markers of angiogenesis by immunohistochemistry in tumor samples. Examination of tumor tissues by immunohistochemistry showed that control mice had increased VEGF-positive endothelial cells compared to curcumin treated mice (Fig. (Fig.6A).6A
We next examined the effects of curcumin and/or TRAIL treatment on number of blood vessels in tumor tissues by utilizing three different approaches (Fig. (Fig.6B).6B Several laboratories, including ours, have demonstrated that numbers of circulating vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGF-R2)-positive endothelial cells correlate directly with increase in tumor angiogenesis and can serve as in vivo indicators of tumor angiogenesis [27,37,38]. As expected, control mice had increased circulating VEGF-R2-positive endothelial cells compared to curcumin treated mice (Fig. (Fig.6C).6C We next confirmed the immunohistochemistry data of VEGF expression by examining the protein levels by the Western blot analysis (Fig. (Fig.6D).6D In vivo regulation of metastasis by curcumin and/or TRAIL Elevated expression of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and uPA are associated with increased metastatic potential in many tumor cells [39-42]. We therefore sought to examine the effects of curcumin on MMP-2, MMP-9, and uPA on tumor tissues derived from xenografted nude mice. Treatment of xenogrfated mice with curcumin resulted in inhibition of MMP-2, MMP-7, and uPA expression than those of control or TRAIL group (Fig. (Fig.7A).7A
Discussion We have recently shown that curcumin induces apoptosis in TRAIL-sensitive PC-3 cells, and sensitizes TRAIL-resistant LNCaP cells in vitro through activation of multiple signaling pathways [35]. Curcumin-induced apoptosis engages mitochondria, which was evident by drop in mitochondrial membrane potential and activation of caspase-3 and caspase-9 in both prostate cancer PC-3 and LNCaP cells [35]. Curcumin induced expression of proapoptotic proteins (Bax, Bak, PUMA, Noxa and Bim), death receptors (TRAIL-R1/DR4 and TRAIL-R2/DR5), and inhibited expression of antiapoptotic proteins (Bcl-2 and Bcl-XL) and IAPs (XIAP and survivin) [35]. Since these proteins regulate cell-intrinsic and/or cell-extrinsic pathways of apoptosis, and they may be responsible for sensitization of TRAIL-resistant LNCaP cells. In the present study, we have demonstrated that curcumin inhibited the growth of LNCaP xenografts, metastasis and angiogenesis. Although the TRAIL was ineffective alone, the combination of curcumin and TRAIL had greater effect on tumor growth inhibition, metastasis and angiogenesis than curcumin. In vitro curcumin downregulated the expression of Bcl-2, and Bcl-XL and upregulated the expression of p53, Bax, Bak, PUMA, Noxa, and Bim at mRNA and protein levels in prostate cancer cells [14]. We have also demonstrated that curcumin upregulated the expression, phosphorylation, and acetylation of p53 in androgen-dependent LNCaP cells [14]. The ability of curcumin to regulate gene transcription was also evident as it caused acetylation of histone H3 and H4 in LNCaP cells [14]. Furthermore, treatment of LNCaP cells with curcumin resulted in translocation of Bax and p53 to mitochondria, production of reactive oxygen species, drop in mitochondrial membrane potential, release of mitochondrial proteins (cytochrome c, Smac/DIABLO and Omi/HtrA2), and activation of caspase-3 leading to apoptosis [14]. Furthermore, deletion of Bax and Bak genes completely inhibited curcumin-induced cytochrome c and Smac/DIABLO release in mouse embryonic fibroblasts [13]. In the present study, tumor tissues derived from curcumin treated mice showed that curcumin inhibited the exprerssion of Bcl-2 and Bcl-XL, and induced the expression of Bax and Bak. The combinatioin of curcumin and TRAIL was more effective in regulating Bcl-2 family members than single agent alone. Our in vitro and in vivo studies demonstrate that curcumin can engage cell-intrinsic pathway of apoptosis by regulating the expression of Bcl-2 family of proteins. We and others have recently shown that curcumin caused a growth arrest at G1/S stage in several cancers including prostate [43-45]. The G1/S phase arrest by curcumin was associated with the induction of p21/WAF1, p27/KIP1, and p16, and inhibition of cyclin D1, cyclin E, Cdk4 and cdk 6 [45]. The ability of curcumin to induce cdk inhibitors p21/CIP1 and p27/KIP1 and inhibit cyclin D1 expression was also confirmed in our xenograft experiment. In a recent study, we have demonstrated that inhibition of p21/CIP1 inhibited curcumin-induced cell cycle arrest and apoptosis [46]. We and others have also demonstrated that curcumin induces the degradation of cyclin E expression through ubiquitin-dependent pathway in several cancer cell lines [44,45]. Interestingly, deregulated expression of cyclin E correlated with chromosome instability [47], malignant trasformation [48], tumor progression [49], and patient survival [50]. Overall, our data suggest that curcumin induces growth arrest at G1/S stage of cell cycle. Entry of malignant cells into the vasculature (i.e. intravasation) requires proteolytic remodeling of the extracellular matrix so that tumor cells may pass through the local stroma and penetrate the vessel wall. The circulatory system then provides a means of transporting tumor cells to distant sites where they extravasate and establish metastatic lesions. Matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) is up-regulated in many tumor types and has been implicated in tumor progression and metastasis. MMP is critical for pericellular degradation of the extracellular matrix, thereby promoting tumor cell invasion and dissemination. To grow efficiently in vivo, tumor cells induce angiogenesis in both primary solid tumors and metastatic foci. Our results showed that curcumin significantly inhibited the growth of TRAIL-resistant LNCaP xenografts and sensitized these xenografts to undergo apoptosis by TRAIL. Tumor tissues derived from curcumin treated mice showed that curcumin inhibibited proliferation (PCNA and Ki67 staining), induced apoptosis (TUNEL staining), metastasis (uPA, MMP-2 and MMP-9 staining), and angiogenesis (CD31 and VEGF staining). Curcumin also inhibited VEGFR2-positive circulating endothelial cells. Treatment of LNCaP xenografted mice with TRAIL alone had no effect on tumor growth, apoptosis, metastasis and angiogenesis. Our recent in vitro studies demonstrated that curcumin inhibits capillary tube formation and endothelial cell migration, and the inhibitory effects of curcumin were enhanced in the presence of ERK MAP kinase inhibitor [35]. These data suggest that curcumin can inhibit tumor growth by inhibiting apoptosis, metastasis and angiogenesis. TRAIL induces apoptosis in cancer cells which express TRAIL-R1/DR4 and TRAIL-R2/DR5. We have shown that the upregulation of death receptors by chemotherapeutic drugs, irradiation and chemopreventive agents enhance or sensitize cancer cells to TRAIL treatment [28,30,35,51-58]. Specifically, TRAIL-resistant LNCaP cells can be sensitized by chemotherapeutic drugs and irradiation in vitro and in vivo through upregulation of death receptors DR4 and/or DR5 [27,28]. Similarly, our in vitro study has demonstrated the upregulation of DR4 and DR5 in PC-3 and LNCaP cells by curcumin [35]. Interestigly, curcumin sensitized TRAIL-resistant LNCaP xenografts by inhibiting tumor cell proliferation and inducing apoptosis which were correlated with induction of death receptors DR4 and DR5. Death receptor (DR4 and/or DR5) regulation has been shown to be under the control of transcription factor NFκB, SP1 and p53 [59-64]. Inducible silencing of KILLER/DR5 in vivo promoted bioluminescent colon tumor xenograft growth and confers resistance to chemotherapeutic agent 5-fluorouracil [65]. These finding suggest that upregulation of death receptors DR4 and DR5 by curcumin may be one of the mechanisms by which curcumin enhances the therapeutic potnetial of TRAIL. The NFκB family of transcription factors has been shown to be constitutively activated in various human malignancies, including a number of solid tumors, leukemias, and lymphomas [66]. NFκB is shown to contribute to development and/or progression of malignancy by regulating the expression of genes involved in cell growth, differentiation, apoptosis, angiogenesis and metastasis [66]. Prostate cancer cells have been reported to have constitutive NFκB activity due to increased activity of the IκB kinase complex [67]. Furthermore, an inverse correlation between androgen receptor (AR) status and NFκB activity was observed in prostate cancer cell lines [68]. In prostate cancer cells, NFκB may promote cell growth and proliferation by regulating expression of genes such as c-myc, cyclin D1, and IL-6 [66,69], and inhibit apoptosis through activation of expression of anti-apoptotic genes, such as Bcl-2 and Bcl-XL. NFκB-mediated expression of genes, involved in angiogenesis (IL-8, VEGF), invasion and metastasis (MMP-9, uPA, uPA receptor), may further contribute to the progression of prostate cancer. Constitutive NFκB activity has also been demonstrated in primary prostate cancer tissue samples and suggested to have prognostic importance for a subset of primary tumors. In the present study, curcumin inhibited the activation of NFκB and its gene products such as VEGF, Bcl-2, Bcl-XL, uPA, cyclin D1, MMP-2, MMP-9, COX-2 and IL-8 in LNCaP xenografted tumors. These findings suggest that NFκB may play a role in human prostate cancer development, and/or progression, and curcumin can inhibit these processes through regulation of NFκB-regulated gene products. Conclusion Our in vivo experiments have demonstrated that curcumin sensitizes TRAIL-resistant LNCaP cells through multiple mechanisms. It induces death receptors, upregulates proapoptotic members of Bcl-2 family (Bax and Bak), inhibits antiapoptotic Bcl-2 proteins (Bcl-2 and Bcl-XL) and markers of cell proliferation (PCNA and Ki67), and induces expression of cell cycle inhibitors p21/CIP1, and p27/KIP1. Furthermore, curcumin can also inhibit the activation of NFκB and its gene products (e.g. VEGF, Bcl-2, Bcl-XL, uPA, cyclin D1, MMP-2, MMP-9, COX-2 and IL-8) in vitro [35], and in vivo (current study), which play significant roles in invasion, metastasis and angiogenesis. All these events will significantly contribute to the antiproliferative and antitumor activities of curcumin. Clinical trials on curcumin have demonstrated that (1) curcuma extract can be administered safely to patients at doses of up to 2.2 g daily, equivalent to 180 mg of curcumin; and (2) curcumin has low oral bioavailability in humans and may undergo intestinal metabolism [70]. Our studies posses strong clinical potential because curcumin either alone or in combination with TRAIL can be used to prevent and/or treat prostate cancer. Methods Reagents Antibodies against CD31, VEGF, VEGFR2, Bcl-2, Bcl-XL, Bax, Bak, TRAIL-R1/DR4, TRAIL-R2/DR5 and β-actin were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA). Antibodies against p21, p27, phospho-p65-NFκB, Cox-2, IL-8, cyclin D1, uPA, MMP-2, and MMP-9 were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology, Inc. (Danvers, MA). Enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) Western blot detection reagents were from Amersham Life Sciences Inc. (Arlington Heights, IL). Terminal Deoxynucleotidyl Transferase Biotin-dUTP Nick End Labeling (TUNEL) assay kit was purchased from EMD Biosciences/Calbiochem (San Diego, CA). TRAIL was purified as described elsewhere [71]. Curcumin was purchased from LKT Laboratories, Inc. (St. Paul, MN). Western blot analysis Western blot analysis was performed as we described earlier [13]. Protein bands were visualized on X-ray film using an enhanced chemiluminescence system. Xenograft assays in nude mice Athymic nude mice (Balb c nu/nu, 4–6 weeks old) were purchased from the National Cancer Institute (Frederick, MD). LNCaP cells (2 × 106cells as a 50% suspension in matrigel, Becton Dickinson, Bedford, MA) in a final volume of 0.1 ml were injected subcutaneously at right flank of Balb c nude mice. When the average tumor volume reached about 100 mm3, mice were randomized into four groups of 10 mice/group, and the following treatment protocol was implemented: Group 1, vehicle control (0.1 ml normal saline containing 0.5 % DMSO) administered by oral injection, three times/week (Monday, Wednesday and Friday) beginning the day of tumor cell implantation through out the duration of experiment; Group 2, TRAIL (15 mg/kg) administered i.v. on day 1, 7, 14, and 21; Group 3, curcumin (30 mg/kg, in 0.1 ml normal saline containing 0.5 % DMSO) administered by oral injection, three times/week (Monday, Wednesday and Friday) beginning the day of tumor cell implantation through out the duration of experiment; Group 4, curcumin and TRAIL, curcumin administered through oral injection, and TRAIL administered i.v. Mice were housed under pathogen-free conditions and maintained on a 12 h light/12 h dark cycle, with food and water supplied ad libitum. Tumor volume was calculated using the equation: (volume = length × width × depth × 0.5236 mm3). The in vivo experiment was performed under IACUC's approved protocol. Immunohistochemistry Immunohistochemistry was performed as described earlier (28, 29). In brief, tumor tissues were collected on week 6, excised and fixed with 10% formalin, embedded in paraffin and sectioned. Tissue sections were stained with primary antibodies against Bax, Bak, Bcl-2, Bcl-XL, DR4, DR5, Ki-67, PCNA, p21/WAF1/CIP1, p27/Kip1, IL-8, Cox-2, phospho-p65-NFkB, CD31, VEGF, VEGFR2, MMP-2, MMP-9 and uPA or TUNEL reaction mixture. For immunohistochemistry, sections were fixed in cold 100% acetone for 3 min, air-dried, and incubated with various primary antibodies at room temperature for 4 h. Subsequently, slides were washed three times in PBS and incubated with secondary antibody at room temperature for 1 h. Finally, alkaline phosphatase or hydrogen peroxide polymer-AEC chromagen substrate kits were used as per manufacturer' instructions (Lab Vision Corporation). After washing with PBS, Vectashield (Vector Laboratories) mounting medium was applied and sections were coverslipped and imaged. Electrophoretic mobility shift assay EMSA was performed as we described elsewhere [59]. Statistical analysis The mean and SD were calculated for each experimental group. Differences between groups were analyzed by one or two way ANOVA. The non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test was performed to assess the difference of tumor volume between control and treatment group. To assess the difference between two groups under multiple conditions, one-way ANOWA followed by Bonferoni's multiple comparison tests were performed using PRISM statistical analysis software (GrafPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA). Significant differences among groups were calculated at P < 0.05. Competing interests The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests. Authors' contributions SS, SG, and QC have performed the experiments and drafted the manuscript. RS has directed the project and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Acknowledgements The project was funded by the Department of Defense US Army and the National Institutes of Health. We thank all the lab members for critically reading the manuscript. References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||
Nat Rev Cancer. 2002 May; 2(5):331-41.
[Nat Rev Cancer. 2002]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Dec 10; 99(25):16226-31.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002]Nat Med. 2000 Aug; 6(8):852-5.
[Nat Med. 2000]Cell. 2000 Jan 7; 100(1):57-70.
[Cell. 2000]Curr Mol Med. 2003 Nov; 3(7):643-51.
[Curr Mol Med. 2003]Adv Exp Med Biol. 2007; 595():1-75.
[Adv Exp Med Biol. 2007]Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2001 Dec; 10(12):1295-9.
[Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2001]Anticancer Agents Med Chem. 2006 May; 6(3):259-70.
[Anticancer Agents Med Chem. 2006]Clin Cancer Res. 2007 Jun 1; 13(11):3423-30.
[Clin Cancer Res. 2007]Carcinogenesis. 2007 Jun; 28(6):1277-86.
[Carcinogenesis. 2007]Cell. 1996 Oct 4; 87(1):13-20.
[Cell. 1996]Annu Rev Immunol. 1996; 14():649-83.
[Annu Rev Immunol. 1996]Annu Rev Immunol. 1998; 16():225-60.
[Annu Rev Immunol. 1998]Semin Cancer Biol. 2003 Apr; 13(2):107-14.
[Semin Cancer Biol. 2003]Anticancer Agents Med Chem. 2006 May; 6(3):259-70.
[Anticancer Agents Med Chem. 2006]Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1999 Apr; 11(2):255-60.
[Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1999]Neoplasia. 2001 Nov-Dec; 3(6):535-46.
[Neoplasia. 2001]Prostate. 2005 Feb 1; 62(2):165-86.
[Prostate. 2005]Prostate. 2004 Sep 15; 61(1):35-49.
[Prostate. 2004]J Clin Invest. 1999 Jul; 104(2):155-62.
[J Clin Invest. 1999]J Mol Signal. 2007 Oct 4; 2():10.
[J Mol Signal. 2007]J Mol Signal. 2007 Oct 4; 2():10.
[J Mol Signal. 2007]J Mol Signal. 2007 Oct 4; 2():10.
[J Mol Signal. 2007]Sci STKE. 1999 Oct 26; 1999(5):RE1.
[Sci STKE. 1999]Prostate. 2005 Feb 1; 62(2):165-86.
[Prostate. 2005]Semin Cancer Biol. 2003 Apr; 13(2):159-67.
[Semin Cancer Biol. 2003]Semin Oncol. 2002 Dec; 29(6 Suppl 16):15-8.
[Semin Oncol. 2002]J Cell Biochem. 2004 Jan 1; 91(1):100-17.
[J Cell Biochem. 2004]Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2006 Mar; 25(1):9-34.
[Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2006]J Mol Signal. 2007 Oct 4; 2():10.
[J Mol Signal. 2007]Int J Oncol. 2007 Apr; 30(4):905-18.
[Int J Oncol. 2007]Carcinogenesis. 2007 Jun; 28(6):1277-86.
[Carcinogenesis. 2007]Nutr Cancer. 2004; 49(2):200-8.
[Nutr Cancer. 2004]Cell Cycle. 2007 Dec 1; 6(23):2953-61.
[Cell Cycle. 2007]Biochem Pharmacol. 2007 Apr 1; 73(7):1024-32.
[Biochem Pharmacol. 2007]Nature. 1999 Sep 16; 401(6750):297-300.
[Nature. 1999]Oncogene. 1997 Nov 20; 15(21):2615-23.
[Oncogene. 1997]J Mol Signal. 2007 Oct 4; 2():10.
[J Mol Signal. 2007]Prostate. 2004 Sep 15; 61(1):35-49.
[Prostate. 2004]Neoplasia. 2001 Nov-Dec; 3(6):535-46.
[Neoplasia. 2001]J Mol Signal. 2007 Oct 4; 2():10.
[J Mol Signal. 2007]Cancer Res. 2003 Sep 1; 63(17):5390-400.
[Cancer Res. 2003]Int J Mol Med. 2005 Dec; 16(6):1125-38.
[Int J Mol Med. 2005]Nature. 2006 May 25; 441(7092):431-6.
[Nature. 2006]Mol Pharmacol. 2006 Jan; 69(1):195-206.
[Mol Pharmacol. 2006]Mol Cancer Res. 2007 Jan; 5(1):87-94.
[Mol Cancer Res. 2007]Mol Carcinog. 2006 Jun; 45(6):355-61.
[Mol Carcinog. 2006]J Mol Signal. 2007 Oct 4; 2():10.
[J Mol Signal. 2007]Clin Cancer Res. 2001 Jul; 7(7):1894-900.
[Clin Cancer Res. 2001]Int J Oncol. 2001 Jan; 18(1):187-94.
[Int J Oncol. 2001]Carcinogenesis. 2007 Jun; 28(6):1277-86.
[Carcinogenesis. 2007]Cancer Res. 2003 Mar 1; 63(5):1059-66.
[Cancer Res. 2003]