![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2007 Tyra et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. Host origin of plastid solute transporters in the first photosynthetic eukaryotes 1Department of Biological Sciences and Roy J Carver Center for Comparative Genomics, 446 Biology Building, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242-1324, USA 2Department of Plant Biology, S-336 Plant Biology Building, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824-1312, USA 3Current address: Institute for Plant Biochemistry, Heinrich-Heine-University, Gebäude 26.03.01, Universitätsstrasse 1, D-40225 Düsseldorf, Germany Corresponding author.#Contributed equally. Heather M Tyra: heather-tyra/at/uiowa.edu; Marc Linka: zimme139/at/msu.edu; Andreas PM Weber: andreas.weber/at/uni-duesseldrof.de; Debashish Bhattacharya: debashi-bhattacharya/at/uiowa.edu Received June 22, 2007; Revised August 23, 2007; Accepted October 5, 2007. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract Background It is generally accepted that a single primary endosymbiosis in the Plantae (red, green (including land plants), and glaucophyte algae) common ancestor gave rise to the ancestral photosynthetic organelle (plastid). Plastid establishment necessitated many steps, including the transfer and activation of endosymbiont genes that were relocated to the nuclear genome of the 'host' followed by import of the encoded proteins into the organelle. These innovations are, however, highly complex and could not have driven the initial formation of the endosymbiosis. We postulate that the re-targeting of existing host solute transporters to the plastid fore-runner was critical for the early success of the primary endosymbiosis, allowing the host to harvest endosymbiont primary production. Results We tested this model of transporter evolution by conducting a comprehensive analysis of the plastid permeome in Arabidopsis thaliana. Of 137 well-annotated transporter proteins that were initially considered, 83 that are broadly distributed in Plantae were submitted to phylogenetic analysis. Consistent with our hypothesis, we find that 58% of Arabidopsis transporters, including all carbohydrate transporters, are of host origin, whereas only 12% arose from the cyanobacterial endosymbiont. Four transporter genes are derived from a Chlamydia-like source, suggesting that establishment of the primary plastid likely involved contributions from at least two prokaryotic sources. Conclusion Our results indicate that the existing plastid solute transport system shared by Plantae is derived primarily from host genes. Important contributions also came from the cyanobacterial endosymbiont and Chlamydia-like bacteria likely co-resident in the first algae. Background Plastids in eukaryotes that contain chlorophyll are capable of carrying out photosynthesis, a process that converts light energy, carbon dioxide, and water into organic compounds. The evolutionary history of this organelle unfolded over a billion years ago when a previously non-photosynthetic protist engulfed and maintained a free-living cyanobacterium in its cytoplasm [1]. It is hard to over-state the importance of this ancient and extraordinarily rare primary endosymbiosis because plastids allowed the evolution of algae and the plants that form the base of the food chain for many ecosystems on Earth. Current data suggest that the primary endosymbiosis occurred once in the common ancestor of the red, green (including land plants), and glaucophyte algae, the Plantae [2-4], with the original plastid and the nuclear-encoded machinery for running the organelle spreading in subsequent cell captures to other branches of the eukaryotic tree [5-7]. The only other known case of a potential bona fide cyanobacterial primary endosymbiosis occurred relatively recently in the thecate amoeba Paulinella chromatophora [8,9]. The gradualist view of evolution through mutation-selection suggests that it would have taken millions of years for the captured prokaryote to become fully integrated into the 'host' eukaryote, ultimately becoming the site not only for carbon fixation but also for other complex functions, such as lipid, isoprenoid, and amino acid biosynthesis [10]. These processes were associated with the migration of much of the cyanobacterial genome to the host nucleus and development of the complex protein import system that are key shared features among all canonical plastids [3,11,12]. A remarkable exception to the view that endosymbiosis was a gradual process of integration is offered by the katablepharid protist 'Hatena', which undergoes large-scale morphological changes following the engulfment of a green alga [13]. Regardless of whether the ancient primary endosymbiosis fostered an accelerated rate of morphological evolution in the Plantae ancestor or whether general cell morphology was unchanged as in the Paulinella example [14], one thing is clear - in the absence of rapid benefits to the host it is unlikely that the endosymbiosis would long have been sustained. Given the need for short-term survival, a key feature of early success for the endosymbiosis must have been the integration of the metabolism of the two cells. The key to this process would have been solute transporters that regulate the flux of metabolites (for example, ATP, phosphate, sugars and sugar phosphates, metal ions, and other important ions) across the organelle membranes. Controlled exchange in response to environmental factors such as changes in light intensity and trace metal availability [15-17] is decisive because the unregulated flux of metabolites would have had detrimental effects and, thereby, lowered the evolutionary fitness of the endosymbiosis. A complex system of solute transporters is in place today in extant plastids that provides the link between this organelle and the surrounding cytosol [18-20]. Here we focus on the evolutionary history of these plastid metabolite transporters to infer early events in plastid evolution. We make two assumptions in this study. First, a system of metabolite transporters was a critical and early development in plastid evolution to supply the endosymbiont with essential nutrients and to enable the host to reap immediate benefit from photosynthetic primary production. It is unclear why the cyanobacterium that was destined to become the plastid escaped digestion in the host but this scenario has also played out in 'Hatena' and in Paulinella. Second, whereas the genome of the previously free-living cyanobacterium encoded all the transport systems required for the uptake of essential inorganic nutrients, it most likely did not harbor genes encoding transporters for the export of organic solutes to the host - this would have served no obvious pre-existing purpose in the prokaryote. Precisely how the plastid solute transport system was established is unknown. One possible model involves a primarily cyanobacterial origin, in which the plastid continued to utilize its own original cyanobacterial solute transporters with their evolution over time into proteins that perform most or all currently known plastid permeome functions. An alternative model involves a host-driven solute transport system, likely derived from the vacuolar envelope that initially surrounded the endosymbiont after its engulfment [3]. And finally, both of the new partners could have contributed proteins equally to this machinery, resulting in a chimeric system composed of the most beneficial combination possible of prokaryotic and eukaryotic transporters. To determine which of these competing hypotheses best explains plastid transporter evolution, we undertook an initial bioinformatics analysis of 137 Arabidopsis thaliana solute transporters and then a detailed phylogenetic analysis of a subset of 83 conserved proteins that included available data from other Plantae. The Arabidopsis transporters are either predicted or have been shown to be chloroplast targeted and are ideal for tracking plastid permeome evolution. Using these data we demonstrate that over one-half of Plantae plastid targeted transporters are putatively of host origin whereas less than a quarter arose from the cyanobacterial endosymbiont. This suggests that the lasting contribution to the Plantae host-endosymbiont relationship with regard to the plastid solute transport system was made primarily by host genes. We also find evidence for the origin of four transporter genes or gene families from a Chlamydia-like source. This latter result raises the possibility that establishment of the ancient primary plastid may have involved contributions from at least two prokaryotic sources, perhaps explaining its singular nature. This hypothesis received substantial support from the recent finding of at least 21 genes of Chlamydia-like origin in the nuclear genome of the extremophilic red alga Cyanidioschyzon merolae [21]. Results and discussions Distribution of transporters within Plantae Phylogenetic analysis of the best-annotated transporter data that are currently available from Arabidopsis was used to identify and putatively annotate homologs from other Plantae. Of 137 transporter proteins that were initially considered, BLAST and phylogenetic analyses and manual curation of recently available data led to the identification of 83 proteins that were of sufficient conservation and broad distribution among Plantae to be used for further analyses. Each of these 83 proteins that included gene families (that is, representing 63 distinct, ancestral genes; Table 1) was used as input in BLAST and PHYML bootstrap analyses to infer the trees. This approach identified 41 proteins that are present in both red and green algae (including land plants) and, therefore, were likely found in the Plantae ancestor (glaucophyte homologs were found for some of these genes; for example, ADP/ATP translocase, hypothetical protein At3g45890). Eleven proteins were restricted to green algae and land plants, seven were plant-specific, and two were limited to red algae and land plants. The distribution of these proteins with respect to their putative origin in Plantae is shown in Figure Figure1a.1a
Most proteins of the plastid envelope permeome are host-derived Analysis of the phylogenetic data supports the notion that the host drove the integration of plastid and host metabolism. We find that the majority (58%, when considering all 83 genes; Figure Figure1b1b
The cyanobacterial contribution The cyanobacterial endosymbiont putatively contributed ten solute transporters to the plastid transport system (Table 1, Figure S2 in Additional data file 1). These proteins include trigalactosyldiacylglycerol 1 (TGD1; Figure Figure3a),3a
'Chlamydia-like' transporters In addition to the host and cyanobacteria, a third significant contributor to the Plantae plastid solute transport system is the Chlamydiae. A surprisingly high number (four) of plastid envelope membrane transporters have been contributed by these prokaryotes. The presence of plant-like genes in Chlamydia has been noted in the past, sparking debate over whether their presence indicated a transfer from the ancestral plant to Chlamydia, an evolutionary relationship between cyanobacteria and Chlamydia, or a horizontal gene transfer (HGT) from a chlamydial parasite to the plant ancestor [34-36]. Phylogenetic analysis of plastid, Chlamydiae, and Rickettsiae ADP/ATP translocases [36] supports an ancient Chlamydia-to-Plantae direction of transfer. This explanation for the origin of the ADP/ATP translocase gene (and other Chlamydial-like genes) in Plantae was strongly supported by the phylogenomic analysis of Huang and Gogarten [21]. We found a monophyletic relationship between the AtNTT1 and AtNTT2 (the Arabidopsis plastid ADP/ATP translocases) and Chlamydiae ADP/ATP translocases (Figure (Figure4a)4a
In summary, it is surprising that bacteria not putatively involved in the endosymbiosis contributed 8% of the transporters that we have identified. When one considers the functions of these transporters, the chlamydial contribution becomes more important. HMA1 increases copper and/or zinc transport into the plastid under conditions of high light, facilitating the production of copper/zinc superoxide dismutase (CuZnSOD), which protects the plant from superoxide radicals produced under high light conditions [42,43]. PHT2;1, a phosphate transporter, controls phosphate allocation under conditions of phosphate-starvation [44]. The DiT transporters are involved in assimilating nitrogen and recovering carbon lost to photorespiration, a process that is initiated by the oxygenation reaction of Rubisco that primarily occurs under conditions when a high O2:CO2 ratio is present in the vicinity of Rubisco. Mutants lacking these transporters are unable to survive in ambient CO2 concentrations [17,45,46]. Finally, the AtNTT1 and AtNTT2 transporters are required for ATP import into the plastid during the dark (that is, in the absence of photosynthetic ATP production), particularly during lipid and chlorophyll biosynthesis. Although AtNTT2 mutants are still capable of producing lipids, indicating that the plastid has an alternative method for generating the ATP required for lipid biosynthesis, the production is significantly reduced and mutant plants have a sharply reduced growth rate [16]. Arabidopsis mutants deficient in both AtNTT1 and AtNTT2 develop necrotic lesions when grown under short days, accumulate H2O2, and, strikingly, show constitutive expression of CuZnSOD2 and ascorbate peroxidase [47]. The phenotype of the mutant was linked to reduced magnesium chelatase activity and it was concluded that ATP import into plastids in the dark is required for chlorophyll biosynthesis and for preventing photooxidative damage [47]. The import of ATP into plastids in the dark is thus clearly a case in which the endosymbiont benefits from host metabolism. The ancient origin of these transporters in the tree of photosynthetic eukaryotes (Figure (Figure4a)4a How the 'Chlamydia-like' genes entered into the Plantae ancestor is unclear but it is possible that both the cyanobacterial endosymbiont and chlamydial parasites may have co-existed in the cell. Many environmental Chlamydia are known today that are broadly distributed in animals and protists [48]. The co-existence of these two distinct prokaryotes may have provided the genetic 'toolkit' to make permanent the endosymbiosis with gene transfer from each cell providing essential functions for endosymbiont utilization. An alternative explanation is that the cyanobacterial endosymbiont was itself highly chimeric (that is, the 'fluid chromosome model') [49] and contained genes of chlamydial origin that had been gathered through HGT. Although possible, this scenario seems less plausible because it invokes, for example, the presence of an ADP/ATP translocator (a gene typical for 'energy parasites' such as Rickettsiae) in the genome of an oxygenic photosynthetic cell that is unlikely to encounter high concentrations of ATP in the surrounding environment; that is, it is absent from all studied cyanobacteria. Additional discussion of these issues can be found in Huang and Gogarten [21]. 'Other' and 'Plantae-specific' transporters We were unable to conclusively determine the origin of 18 transport proteins. Fourteen of these data sets resulted in PHYML trees in which the Plantae transporters were rooted within prokaryotes but without bootstrap support for a specific affiliation. An excellent example is provided by At1g32080 (Figure (Figure5a),5a
Of the remaining transporters, four fell in the 'Plantae-specific' category because they lacked identifiable homologs outside of this supergroup and may simply be too divergent to determine their origin. This includes At5g24690 (Figure (Figure5b,5b Conclusion Here we determined the phylogeny of 83 Arabidopsis plastid solute transporters to determine whether they are of endosymbiotic origin from the captured cyanobacterium, of host origin, or of a 'mixed' origin from both of these sources. Our analysis has afforded a rare look at early, critical events in primary plastid evolution and support the notion that integration of plastid-host metabolism was primarily driven by host-derived transporters with important contributions coming from the cyanobacterial endosymbiont and Chlamydia-like bacteria. Another class of proteins of currently unknown origin included plant specific transporters such as MEX1. Despite the power of our comparative approach, our work has some important limitations. One is that because we used the Arabidopsis transporter set, we most certainly have missed a number of Plantae transporters that are specific to red or green algae and have been lost from the Arabidopsis genome. In addition, we lack significant data from glaucophytes, but the upcoming Cyanophora paradoxa (glaucophyte) nuclear genome sequence [52] will allow us to incorporate this lineage into future inferences about transporter evolution. It is reasonable to assume, however, given the wealth of data supporting Plantae monophyly [2-4,7], that our inferences regarding the red and green lineages also apply to their glaucophyte sisters. Despite these limitations and the fact that phylogenetic signal is imperfectly maintained over a billion years of evolution, our comprehensive analysis of the chloroplast solute transport system will likely hold up and can be further tested as other genome sequences become available. Materials and methods Initial transporter analyses As a starting point for the compilation of a conservative set of predicted or confirmed plastid envelope membrane transporters, we used a previously published list of 137 plastid-targeted membrane proteins that was based on predicted plastid localization and classification by the transporter classification system [10]. This list was manually curated to remove proteins from the list if published evidence indicated that they were localized to a cellular location other than chloroplasts, if they represented membrane-bound enzymes, or if they were annotated as components of the TIC/TOC protein import apparatus, the photosynthetic machinery of the thylakoid membrane, or the Sec or Tat protein targeting pathways. This curated list of candidate genes was updated and amended with recently published chloroplast envelope membrane transporters, such as AtFOLT1, a plastid localized transporter belonging to the mitochondrial carrier family that does not contain a plastid targeting signal [33] and was thus not included in previous lists. The final list contained 83 A. thaliana predicted or confirmed chloroplast solute transporters. The sequence for each protein was obtained from The Arabidopsis Information Resource website [53]. These protein sequences were used as queries in blastp and tblastn searches of the NCBI Database [54], the plant and algal genomes available through the Joint Genome Institute [55], the Cyanidioschyzon merolae Genome Project website [56], the Galdieria sulphuraria Genome Project website [57], and Dragonblast V2.1 (SE Ruemmele, unpublished data), a web based database in the DB lab that contains EST datasets for several chromalveolates, Plantae, excavates, Rhizaria, and Amoebozoa. We used the predicted protein sequences for the following species for our analysis whenever available: Arabidopsis thaliana, Oryza sativa, Physcomitrella patens, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, Ostreococcus tauri, Ostreococcus lucimarinus, Cyanidioschyzon merolae, Galdieria sulphuraria, Cyanophora paradoxa, Dictyostelium discoideum, Strongylocentrotus purpuratus, Xenopus laevis, Danio rerio, Mus musculus, Canis familiaris, and Homo sapiens. In addition, we included at least one insect, three fungal species, and a broad range of Bacteria and Archaea in our analysis. The BLAST searches used an e-value cut-off < 10-5. If a translated EST sequence was not available, the nucleotide sequence was translated over six frames using the ExPASy translate tool [58]. The resulting protein sequences were used in a BLAST search against the NCBI protein database to ensure the correct translation was obtained. We used the ClustalW feature included with BioEdit V7.0.5.3 to generate protein alignments [59]. Alignments were visually inspected and manually corrected if necessary. Trees were generated under maximum likelihood using PHYML V2.4.4 utilizing the WAG model of amino acid substitution and estimating both the proportion of invariable sites and the alpha parameter (that is, WAG + I + Γ)[60]. We performed non-parametric bootstrap analysis with 100 replicates for each PHYML analysis. The resulting trees were analyzed to determine the origin of the transporter in Arabidopsis and other Plantae. The designation of gene origin was done as follows. When the Plantae solute transporter formed a well-supported (usually > 70% bootstrap support) monophyletic group with homologs in opisthokonts (that is, animals and fungi) and secondarily with other eukaryotes such as excavates and chromalveolates (if present), then it was classified as having a 'Host' origin. Under this scheme, no bacterial sequences interrupted the eukaryotic domain. 'Cyanobacterial' or 'Chlamydia-like' origin was inferred if the Plantae sequence formed a monophyletic group with protein sequences from either of these lineages with strong bootstrap support. Other bacterial or eukaryotic sequences could (not necessarily) be in these trees but there had to be a robust separation of the Plantae + cyanobacteria or Chlamydia-like clade from all other homologs. We had two other categories of gene origin that likely reflected a lack of phylogenetic resolution or pervasive HGT among taxa that defied a clear inference of origin. The first was the 'Other' category in which the Plantae transporter formed a well-supported monophyletic clade but its position relative to available bacterial data was unresolved, thereby not allowing us to identify the donor taxon. The second, 'Plantae-specific', was for transporters that had no significant hits to sequences in GenBank or other databases and appeared to be limited to the Plantae. All of the transporter PHYML bootstrap trees are available in Additional data file 1. The protein alignments are available in the download section of the Bhattacharya Lab website [61]. Detailed phylogenetic analyses For eight representative transporters from the five categories described above we inferred a maximum likelihood phylogeny using RAxML (RAxML-VI-HPC, v2.2.1) [62] and the WAG + Γ evolutionary model. The specific transporters were: 'Host' - At4g39460 (SAMT, S-adenosylmethionine carrier 1 protein, 236 amino acids), At5g66380 (AtFOLT1, Arabidopsis thaliana folate transporter 1, 268 amino acids); 'Cyanobacterial' - At1g19800 (TGD1, trigalactosyldiacylglycerol 1, lipid transporter, 234 amino acids), At5g64940 (ABC transporter protein, 487 amino acids); 'Chlamydia-like' - At1g15500 (chloroplast ADP, ATP carrier protein 2, 436 amino acids), At4g37270 (HMA1, copper exporting ATPase, 444 amino acids); 'Other' - At1g32080 (putative membrane protein, 211 amino acids); 'Plantae-specific' - At5g24690 (hypothetical expressed protein, 274 amino acids). These detailed analyses used a random starting tree (one round of taxon addition) and the rapid hill-climbing algorithm (that is, option -f d in RAxML). To generate bootstrap values for these phylogenies, we used RAxML with the same settings and 100 replications. In addition, we used Bayesian inference (MrBayes V3.0b4) [63] with each of the eight data sets using the WAG + I + Γ model to calculate posterior probabilities for nodes in the RAxML trees. Metropolis-coupled Markov chain Monte Carlo from a random starting tree was used in this analysis with two independent runs (that is, nrun = 2 command) and 1 cold and 3 heated chains. The Bayesian analyses were run for two million generations each with trees sampled every 100th generation. To increase the probability of chain convergence, we sampled trees after the standard deviation values of the two runs were < 0.01 to calculate the posterior probabilities. We also ran the Bayesian analysis for the remaining two putative 'Chlamydia-like' genes in Plantae (dicarboxylate translocators DiT1, DiT2.1, and DiT2.2, and the phosphate transporter PHT2;1) to assess the topologies. We incorporated a representative diversity of available sequences in all of these trees. Abbreviations AtFOLT, A. thaliana folate transporter; AtNTT, A. thaliana ADP/ATP translocase; DiT, dicarboxylate translocator; EST, expressed sequence tag; HGT, horizontal gene transfer; HMA, heavy metal ATPase; TGD, trigalactosyldiacylglycerol. Authors' contributions APMW and ML gathered and prepared the Arabidopsis plastid transporter data for downstream bioinformatic analyses. HMT did the subsequent database searches and built the initial phylogenetic trees. DB was responsible for the final phylogenetic trees presented in the manuscript figures. HMT wrote the initial draft of the manuscript. APMW and DB conceived of and supervised this study and prepared the final manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Additional data files The following additional data are available with the online version of this paper. Additional data file 1 shows trees of all remaining plastid transporters analyzed in this study Additional data file 1 PHYML bootstrap trees of plastid targeted solute transporters of putative 'Host', 'Cyanobacterial', 'Chlamydia-like', 'Other', and 'Plantae-specific' origin found in our study. Click here for file(8.5M, pdf) Acknowledgements This work was supported by NSF Award EF-0332882 to APMW and NIH Award R01 ES013679-01 and NSF Award EF-0431117 to DB. References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||
Mol Biol Evol. 2004 May; 21(5):809-18.
[Mol Biol Evol. 2004]Curr Biol. 2005 Jul 26; 15(14):1325-30.
[Curr Biol. 2005]Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2007 Oct; 45(1):384-91.
[Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2007]Bioessays. 2004 Jan; 26(1):50-60.
[Bioessays. 2004]Curr Opin Plant Biol. 1999 Dec; 2(6):513-9.
[Curr Opin Plant Biol. 1999]Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2005; 56():133-64.
[Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2005]Eukaryot Cell. 2006 Mar; 5(3):609-12.
[Eukaryot Cell. 2006]J Plant Physiol. 2006 Feb; 163(3):333-47.
[J Plant Physiol. 2006]Nat Rev Genet. 2004 Feb; 5(2):123-35.
[Nat Rev Genet. 2004]Science. 2005 Oct 14; 310(5746):287.
[Science. 2005]Plant J. 2003 Aug; 35(3):316-31.
[Plant J. 2003]Mol Cell Proteomics. 2003 May; 2(5):325-45.
[Mol Cell Proteomics. 2003]FEBS Lett. 2007 May 25; 581(12):2215-22.
[FEBS Lett. 2007]Eukaryot Cell. 2006 Mar; 5(3):609-12.
[Eukaryot Cell. 2006]Genome Biol. 2007; 8(6):R99.
[Genome Biol. 2007]Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2007 Oct; 45(1):384-91.
[Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2007]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Jun 24; 100(13):7678-83.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003]Mol Biol Evol. 2004 May; 21(5):809-18.
[Mol Biol Evol. 2004]Mol Biol Evol. 2007 Aug; 24(8):1702-13.
[Mol Biol Evol. 2007]Eukaryot Cell. 2006 Mar; 5(3):609-12.
[Eukaryot Cell. 2006]Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2006 Jun; 9(3):241-7.
[Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2006]EMBO J. 2003 May 15; 22(10):2370-9.
[EMBO J. 2003]Plant Cell. 2003 Jun; 15(6):1333-46.
[Plant Cell. 2003]Plant Cell. 2005 Apr; 17(4):1233-51.
[Plant Cell. 2005]J Biol Chem. 2005 Nov 18; 280(46):38457-63.
[J Biol Chem. 2005]Genome Res. 2002 Aug; 12(8):1159-67.
[Genome Res. 2002]J Bacteriol. 2004 Feb; 186(3):683-91.
[J Bacteriol. 2004]Genome Biol. 2007; 8(6):R99.
[Genome Biol. 2007]Gene. 2003 Mar 13; 306():27-35.
[Gene. 2003]J Exp Bot. 2002 Apr; 53(370):865-74.
[J Exp Bot. 2002]J Biol Chem. 2006 Feb 3; 281(5):2882-92.
[J Biol Chem. 2006]Plant Cell Rep. 2007 May; 26(5):591-8.
[Plant Cell Rep. 2007]Plant Cell. 2002 Aug; 14(8):1751-66.
[Plant Cell. 2002]Plant J. 2003 Aug; 35(3):316-31.
[Plant J. 2003]Plant J. 2006 Jan; 45(2):206-24.
[Plant J. 2006]Nature. 2006 Mar 30; 440(7084):623-30.
[Nature. 2006]Genome Biol. 2007; 8(6):R99.
[Genome Biol. 2007]Mol Biol Evol. 2006 Mar; 23(3):663-74.
[Mol Biol Evol. 2006]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jan 16; 104(3):870-5.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007]Curr Biol. 2005 Jul 26; 15(14):1325-30.
[Curr Biol. 2005]Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2007 Oct; 45(1):384-91.
[Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2007]Curr Opin Plant Biol. 1999 Dec; 2(6):513-9.
[Curr Opin Plant Biol. 1999]Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2005; 56():133-64.
[Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2005]J Biol Chem. 2005 Oct 14; 280(41):34823-31.
[J Biol Chem. 2005]Bioinformatics. 2005 Feb 15; 21(4):456-63.
[Bioinformatics. 2005]Bioinformatics. 2001 Aug; 17(8):754-5.
[Bioinformatics. 2001]