• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of jgenphysiolHomeThe Rockefeller University PressEditorsContactInstructions for AuthorsThis issue
J Gen Physiol. Jan 1, 2001; 117(1): 69–90.
PMCID: PMC2232467

Electrostatics and the Gating Pore of Shaker Potassium Channels


Various experiments have suggested that the S4 segment in voltage-dependent Na+ and K+ channels is in contact with a solvent-accessible cavity. We explore the consequences of the existence of such a cavity through the electrostatic effects on the gating currents of Shaker K+ channels under conditions of reduced ionic strength S. We observe that ~10-fold reductions of intracellular S produce reductions of the measured gating charge of ~10%. These effects continue at even lower values of S. The reduction of gating charge when S is reduced by 10-fold at the extracellular surface is much smaller (~2%). Shifts of the Q(V) curve because of a reduced S are small (<10 mV in size), which is consistent with very little fixed surface charge. Continuum electrostatic calculations show that the S effects on gating charge can be explained by the alteration of the local potential in an intracellular conical cavity of 20–24-Å depth and 12-Å aperture, and a smaller extracellular cavity of 3-Å depth and the same aperture. In this case, the attenuation of the membrane potential at low S leads to reduction of the apparent gating charge. We suggest that this cavity is made by a bundle of transmembrane helices, and that the gating charge movement occurs by translocation of charged residues across a thin septum of ~3–7 Å thickness.

Keywords: Gating currents, voltage dependence, Poisson-Boltzmann equation


Gating of voltage-dependent channels occurs by the interaction of the membrane electric field with charged residues in the channel protein. It now seems clear that the main voltage-sensing elements are the charges of basic amino acid residues in the S4 transmembrane domain, and that gating involves movement of the S4 in the membrane potential field. This movement has been measured indirectly by monitoring state-dependent modification of introduced cysteines or directly by voltage clamp fluorometry (Yang and Horn 1995; Mannuzzu et al. 1996; Yang et al. 1996; Cha and Bezanilla 1997). The charge movement produced by this conformational change in Na+ and K+ channels has been measured to be in the range of 7–13 eo (Hirschberg et al. 1995; Aggarwal and MacKinnon 1996; Seoh et al. 1996; Islas and Sigworth 1999).

Early theories of how the S4 is able to transduce a voltage change into a conformational change assumed an α-helical conformation and had the segment undergoing a screw-like outward motion. This interpretation makes use of the assumption that the large charge movement has to be produced by the interaction of the voltage sensor with an electric potential that is imposed across the full thickness of the plasma membrane, roughly 30 Å. For example, four 25-Å-long α-helices with four equally spaced positive charges in a linear field on a 25-Å membrane would have to be displaced almost 20 Å normal to the membrane plane to produce 12 eo of gating charge. Such a translocation of an α helix is a conformational change of unprecedented magnitude in a membrane protein.

It has been demonstrated that the accessibility of introduced cysteine residues in S4 to soluble sulfhydryl modifying agents is state-dependent and occurs in a manner consistent with the movement of the S4 voltage sensor, transporting residues from the intracellular to the extracellular face of the channel upon depolarization (Yang and Horn 1995; Larsson et al. 1996; Baker et al. 1998). In view of the accessibility patterns of the S4 in the Na+ channel, Yang and Horn 1995 proposed that the S4 is actually located in a water-filled cavity contiguous with the intracellular solution that has been called the gating pore or “canaliculus” (Goldstein 1996). Larsson et al. 1996 demonstrated that in the Shaker S4, modification of introduced cysteines is consistent with a picture in which the S4 is able to move a small distance and still produce the large charge movement measured. These observations implied that the membrane potential might be highly focused in a small region around the S4 and that as in the Na+ channel, a region of high dielectric constant might surround the Shaker S4. In a remarkable set of experiments, Starace et al. 1997 provided evidence that the region in which most of the membrane potential falls across the channel must be very small to account for experiments in which a single histidine substitution allows for proton transport in a pH gradient, as if the histidine completed a narrow pore. Taken together, all of this evidence seems to suggest that the membrane potential is highly focused in a small region around the S4, and that the space around the S4 may be surrounded by a solute-accessible region. These may be clever design elements necessary to obtain a large charge movement with a relatively small conformational change, since the gating charges would then traverse only a small distance to be translocated across most of the membrane potential.

If this arrangement of a water-filled region around the voltage sensor is correct, the electric field may have a complicated shape in the gating pore. For example, it has been demonstrated that cavities within water-soluble proteins produce large focusing effects of the local electric field and that the effects of ionic strength and pH on the electric field in these cavities can be large (Klapper et al. 1986; Rashin et al. 1986). In an integral membrane protein such as an ion channel, the ionic strength of the electrolyte solution in the extracellular and intracellular regions determines the Debye length and, thus, affects the local electric field. If some of the voltage sensing charges lie in cavities, it is possible that altering the local electrical field by manipulation of ionic strength could affect the size of the effective gating charge.

In the experiments presented in this report, we seek to investigate the effects of low ionic strength on charge movement of the Shaker potassium channel, and possibly to estimate the size of the cavity in which the voltage sensor lies. We investigate, through calculations with the linearized Poisson-Boltzmann equation, the size of the ionic screening effects on a simulated gating pore and seek to interpret these in terms of possible geometries for the proposed gating pore.


Channels and Oocyte Preparation

The inactivation-removed Shaker 29-4 channel ShΔ (Hoshi et al. 1990) and the nonconducting W434F mutant ShΔF, (Perozo et al. 1993) were subcloned in the vector pGEM and linearized with NotI. In vitro transcription was done with T7 polymerase, and mRNA was stored at a concentration of 1 μg/μl.

Xenopus laevis oocytes were harvested under anesthesia and defolliculated by incubation with collagenase 1A in Ca2+-free OR2 media for 1 h. Oocytes were kept at 20oC in a solution ([in mM]: 96 NaCl, 1.8 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, and 5 HEPES), and injected 1 or 2 d after harvesting with 50 nl of mRNA with a Nanostepper (Drummond Co.) using pipets of 20-μm diam. Oocytes were used in experiments 1–7 d after injection.


Low S solutions were prepared with sucrose or mannitol to maintain osmolarity and avoid osmotic water transport across the membrane that could produce concentration gradients. The concentration of divalent ions was kept constant in both high and low S solutions to avoid specific effects. We tried as much as possible to keep the same concentration of permeant ions to circumvent their known effects on gating. The composition of solutions is listed in Table .

Table 1
Composition of Solutions

Electrical Recordings

Gating currents from ShΔF and ionic currents from ShΔ channels were recorded in the inside-out patch configuration for testing the effects of ionic strength on the intracellular side of the channel, whereas the cut-open oocyte technique and conventional two-electrode voltage clamp were used to examine extracellular effects. Patches were obtained from mRNA-injected oocytes using borosilicate glass pipets that had a resistance of 1–4 MΩ. Patches were excised into a control solution and locally perfused using a pipet of 20–50 μm in diameter positioned ~10 μm from the patch. Currents were filtered at 5 kHz (−3 dB Bessel characteristic) and sampled at 100 kHz using an EPC-9 amplifier (HEKA Elektronik). 20 or more sweeps were averaged. Linear leak and capacitive currents were subtracted using a −P/4 protocol with a leak holding potential of −120 mV.

Cut-open oocyte voltage clamp recording was done with an amplifier (model CA-1B; Dagan Corp.). A modification to the external solution perfusion system in the cut-open chamber was used. The top and guard chambers were perfused at the same time to avoid gradients in solution composition between these chambers. For two-microelectrode voltage clamp, a Warner Instruments amplifier (OC-725) was used. Current and voltage microelectrodes had a resistance of 400 kΩ, and were filled with 1 M KCl.

Data Analysis

Estimation of the number of channels in a patch of membrane was done by nonstationary noise analysis (Sigworth 1980; Heinemann and Conti 1992). The mean and variance were calculated from 50 to 60 current traces elicited by depolarizing steps to the indicated membrane potential filtered at 5 kHz. Pulses were delivered at 0.5-s intervals. The variance estimation made use of groups of four sweeps to reduce the influence of drifting baselines and channel rundown. The pulsed data were displayed in the form of mean–variance relationships and fitted to the equation

equation M1

where σ2 is the variance, I is the mean current, i is the single channel current, and N is the number of channels. The maximal open probability was then obtained as

equation M2

For estimation of the gating current noise, the nonstationary variance was calculated from 1,000 sweeps (in groups of four) to minimize the effects of the baseline current drift. Data were sampled at 100 kHz and filtered at 5 kHz. Q(V) data were fitted to a Boltzmann function of the form:

equation M3

where Qmax is the charge at saturated voltages, V0.5 is the voltage of half activation and qg is the effective charge; kT has its usual meaning. Values are expressed as the mean ± standard error.


The linearized Poisson-Boltzmann equation (see ) was solved analytically for the one-dimensional case. For the more complex geometries, it was solved numerically in cylindrical coordinates using the finite difference algorithm of Jordan et al. 1989. The implementation was done using Matlab (The Math Works, Inc., version 5) running on a Macintosh G3 computer. Proper convergence, using a grid size of 0.5 Å in both the radial (r) and the z direction, was reached in 16,000 iterations, and took ~4 min for a grid of 60 × 110 Å. The boundary conditions were set such that the potential at the bottom of the integration box, which corresponds to the intracellular solution, is unity and at the top (extracellular solution) it is zero. The radial component of the electric field was also set to zero at the cylindrical (r = 60 Å) boundary. The integration was carried out to 40 Å beyond the membrane in the intracellular and extracellular solutions. The accuracy of the calculation was checked by solving for a point charge and comparing with the analytical expression for the point-charge problem (Bockris and Reddy 1973).


Electrostatic Effects of Ionic Strength on Shaker Gating Currents

The experimentally measured charge movement from gating currents is the product of the moving charge and its coupling to the local electrostatic potential (Sigworth 1994). The charge in an arbitrary state λ of the channel is given by

equation M4

where the sum is over all the charges qi of the protein in state λ. The quantity δiλ is given by

equation M5

Thus, δiλ is the “electrical distance” of the ith charge, and represents the degree of coupling between the local potential [var phi]i and the membrane potential V. The steady-state charge measured in the external circuit at a membrane potential V depends on the state occupancies pλ according to

equation M6

The measured charge movement is then given by

equation M7

where Vo is a reference potential typically chosen to have the channels in a fully deactivated state. It can be seen that only charges qi that move relative to the electric field (δ changes with changes in λ) contribute to Q(V). Any manipulation that alters the relationship between V and [var phi]i (and therefore changes δ) can change the magnitude of Q. The magnitude of the change in the local potential is expected to be a function of the physical conformation of the channel and the lipid bilayer.

We set out to investigate the effects of the electrostatic environment on the gating charge movement in Shaker K+ channels through manipulation of the ionic strength (S), and interpret the results in terms of the possible local environment and conformation of the S4 voltage sensor.

The Electrical Potential Distribution in Lipid Bilayer Membranes

If a potential difference is imposed across a lipid bilayer, bathed in both sides by an electrolyte solution, the potential adopts a characteristic distribution. The potential inside the lipid bilayer decays as a linear function of distance. Outside the membrane, in the electrolyte solution, it decays as an exponential function of distance, because of the redistribution of mobile ions in solution. This is best illustrated by a continuum calculation based on classical electrostatics. The electrical potential in a region of space can be described by the macroscopic Poisson-Boltzmann equation. For small potentials, the linearized Poisson-Boltzmann equation holds, which in the case of zero fixed surface charge density has the form

equation M8

where [var phi] represents the space-dependent electrical potential, epsilon is the space-dependent dielectric constant, and the decay constant κ2 is given by

equation M9

where κ−1 has units of distance and is called the Debye length; ci is the concentration of ionic species i, and zi is the valence.

Roux 1997 has obtained an analytical solution to the linearized Poisson-Boltzmann equation in one dimension for a membrane potential V, in a membrane of thickness d by matching the boundary conditions to make [var phi] and epsilon[nabla]f continuous across the membrane boundaries. Let z = 0 be the inner membrane boundary and z = d be the outer membrane boundary, then the analytical expressions for [var phi] are:

equation M10

epsilons and epsilonm are the dielectric constants of the solution and the membrane, respectively. Using this analytical expression, the potential distribution across a lipid bilayer of thickness d = 30 Å was calculated, when a potential of −100 mV is imposed across it (Fig. 1). The potential in the membrane decays linearly, and the potential in the bath decays according to the Debye-Hückel exponential. The fraction of the transmembrane potential that decays in the bath is a function of the electrostatic shielding of the solution. For a 1:1 electrolyte and epsilons = 80, the Debye length is given by

equation M11

where S is the ionic strength, which is given by

equation M12

where ci and zi are the concentration and the valence of ion i, respectively.

Figure 1
Analytical solution of the linearized Poisson-Boltzmann equation for a planar membrane of 30 Å thickness. The ionic strength in the outside solution is fixed at 318 mM (κ−1 = 7.6 Å) and, in the intracellular side, it is ...

In the case of a physiological solution with S = 300 mM, only 0.75% of the total potential decays in the solution. When S is reduced to 20 or 10 mM, the fraction of potential decaying in the solution increases to 2 and 2.8%, respectively (Fig. 1). Thus, if the charge movement occurs by displacement of the gating charge from one side to the other of the membrane, then in the case of low S, less potential will drop across the membrane itself. This will produce a reduction in the δ and, in consequence, a slight reduction in the measured charge movement. A more complicated situation is to be expected if the charge movement does not involve simple displacement of charged residues from one side of the membrane to the other. As was discussed previously, a clear view of the 3-D organization of transmembrane segments is lacking, but cysteine modification experiments suggest that most of the S4 residues are accessible to the aqueous phase. These results lead to the idea that the S4 transmembrane segment may be surrounded by a solvent-accessible cavity. If this is the case, one expects a larger reduction of the charge with low values of S, and the magnitude of the reduction will be a function of the shape of the cavity.

Intracellular Ionic Strength Effects

The mutant Shaker channel ShΔF was used to record gating currents. This construct contains the W434F mutation that suppresses ionic currents by promoting an inactivation process while leaving the voltage-dependent activation process relatively untouched, allowing for recordings of charge movement without the use of a blocking agent (Perozo et al. 1993; Yang et al. 1997). Currents were recorded in the inside-out configuration of the patch-clamp technique, and the intracellular face was exposed to low S solutions. The tonicity of the solutions was maintained by substituting sucrose for the main electrolyte to avoid osmotic effects (Zimmerberg et al. 1990; Rayner et al. 1992; Starkus et al. 1995).

The main result is illustrated by Fig. 2 A. After excision of the patch into a solution of S = 324 mM, gating currents were recorded. Subsequently, the patch was locally perfused with a solution of lowered S. The amount of the charge was calculated from integration of the gating current at potentials where the charge has saturated. Exposure to a solution of S = 24 mM reduces the charge by 8.7 ± 3.5% (n = 6). This reduction happens with little shift in the voltage dependence of charge movement (Fig. 2 C). The fact that the reduction of S does not shift the Q(V) curve suggests that the net surface charge in the intracellular part of Shaker channels is very small.

Figure 2
Effects of low ionic strength solution (24 mM) on the gating charge movement in Shaker. (A) Gating current traces at +20 mV from a holding potential of –90 mV, before (continuous trace) and after (dotted trace) perfusion on the intracellular side ...

This reduction of the amount of charge, although modest, is larger than the 1.7% decrease that would be expected from charge movement within a simple planar membrane (Fig. 1). To try to understand this reduction better, the gating current noise was measured from an ensemble of gating currents at high and low S. The variance is reduced by ~20% by the reduction of S (Fig. 2 B). In the limit of large depolarizations, the mean gating current and its variance are functions of the gating charge as follows:

equation M13

where q is the elementary gating charge, n is the rate of charge movement, and B is the bandwidth of the recording (Conti and Stühmer 1989; Crouzy and Sigworth 1993). The fitted values of q from the mean and variance time courses in Fig. 2 are 1.0 eo for S = 318 mM and 0.8 eo for S = 24 mM. This result is consistent with the idea that the effect of low S is to diminish the size of the individual gating charge shots.

A further reduction of S to 12 mM produces the larger reduction of the total charge of 16.1 ± 2.9% (n = 4), and still no significant shift in the Q(V) relationship is detected. Fig. 3 shows data from one such experiment. These experiments at a lower S were carried out with either NMDG-aspartate or CsCl as the cation-anion pair without observing any major difference.

Figure 3
Effects of low ionic strength solutions (12 mM) on the gating currents of Shaker. (A) Gating current traces before and after perfusion of the intracellular side of a patch for depolarizations from−30 to 60 mV from a holding potential of −90 ...

It is conceivable that the reduction in the size of the gating current arises from a reduction in the number of functional channels or through immobilization of the channel gating mechanism. To test for these possibilities, the influence of a low S on the ionic currents of conducting channels was determined. Experiments were carried out in which the intracellular face of inside-out patches was perfused with low S solution, while the inward current carried by potassium was recorded (Fig. 4). Under these conditions, noise analysis was used to determine the open probability and the number of channels in the patch.

Figure 4
Ionic strength effects on ionic currents of Shaker. (A) I(V) relationships obtained from ramps of voltage (0.32 mV/ms) using S = 318 K-Asp intracellular K+ solution and switching to S = 12 mM intracellular solution. The external solution is pipet K. The ...

The changes observed in the shape of the current–voltage relationship in low S are consistent with a change in the driving force being the main difference. With the S = 12 mM (NMDG) internal solutions, the outward current disappears, and the reversal potential shifts by >60 mV. The nonlinear I(V) relationship in symmetrical K+ concentrations has been observed previously (Heginbotham and MacKinnon 1993), and we account for it by using a simple permeation model having a single energy barrier (see Fig. 4 legend). The other main effect of a low S is that the activation seems to be shifted in the hyperpolarizing direction by ~10 mV at S = 12 mM and 6 mV at S = 24 mM (Fig. 4 B).

The nonstationary variance was also determined from multiple pulsed sweeps to a voltage where the function p(V) is saturated (Fig. 4 C). This provides estimates of the open probability and the number of channels. It is seen that by lowering S to 24 or 12 mM, the estimated number of channels diminishes by <1% (from 5,624 to 5,605 in this experiment). This result confirms that the charge reduction observed in gating currents is not a simple result of fewer channels contributing to the recording. The maximum open probability is also changed very little, from 0.81 at 324 mM to 0.67 at 12 mM.

Finally, to test if the use of sucrose solutions to reduce S has a specific effect on charge movement, mannitol-containing solutions were used. Gating currents in low S solutions (12 mM) prepared with mannitol also display a reduction of the gating current comparable to that observed at the same S with sucrose solutions. Gating charge is reduced by 17.5 ± 4.3% (n = 2). No significant shift in the Q(V) curve or the gating current kinetics was observed (Fig. 5). This supports the idea that the effects are produced by low S and not by specific effects of the osmoticant.

Figure 5
Effects of mannitol-containing low ionic strength solutions (12 mM) on the gating charge movement in Shaker. (A) Gating current traces before and after perfusion of the intracellular side of a patch for depolarizations from –90 to 30 mV. (Continuous ...

It has been shown that the absence of permeant ions in the extracellular side of the pore of Shaker K+ channels accelerates the rate of C-type inactivation (Baukrowitz and Yellen 1996). This process is accompanied by an immobilization of charge in response to prolonged depolarization (Olcese et al. 1997). To test for the possibility that C-type inactivation may be responsible for the reduced charge observed here, we examined the charge movement as a function of time both in the high S solution and after perfusion with the low S solution. Fig. 6 shows an experiment in which the charge was monitored for ~40 s in a solution of S = 318 mM and also in S = 24 mM (Fig. 6A and Fig. B). The charge remains constant for the duration of the recordings (Fig. 6 C). This indicates that there is not an appreciable degree of accumulation of slow inactivation or rundown.

Figure 6
Tests for possible charge immobilization produced by slow inactivation of Shaker channels. (A and B) Representative average gating currents obtained from 10 sweeps for depolarization from –90 to 0 mV. The pulse interval was 200 ms for averaging, ...

Fig. 6 D also shows that the effects of low ionic strength are almost fully reversible. After exposure to S = 24 mM and return to high S solution, the charge recovers to within 98% of that of the control. In two additional patches, the recovery was within 97% and, in three more, it was within 95% of the control. These experiments indicate that charge reduction seems not to be a product of cumulative slow inactivation, and combined with the fact that the open probability and the number of functional channels in the patch is changed very little by a low S, argue in favor of the interpretation that the reduction of the gating charge is caused by the reduction of intracellular ionic strength only.

Extracellular Effects

We first attempted to measure the effect of lowering S of the extracellular solution in outside-out patches, but these were not stable in low S solutions, and the integration of gating currents was unreliable. For this reason, we decided to use the cut-open oocyte technique (Taglialatela et al. 1992). In preliminary experiments using perfusion of the upper chamber with low S solutions, we observed a very large reduction (55%) of the gating currents. This could arise from different patterns of current flow at the boundary between the top and guard chambers during perfusion of the top chamber with low S solutions.

For this reason, we decided to perfuse both the guard and top chambers. Simultaneous perfusion of the chambers with low S solutions resulted in only a small decrease in charge movement. To be certain that this decrease is not artifactual, we also tested the effect of low S on whole oocytes using two-microelectrode voltage clamp. Lowering the external S to 28 or 16 mM was seen to produce a very modest change in the size of the gating currents. The reduction of the charge is ~2.2% at 28 mM. This effect is seen in both two-electrode voltage clamp recordings and in cut-open clamp recordings (Fig. 7). A larger reduction of S to 16 mM produces a reduction in the charge of 3.5%. A reduction of extracellular S produces only a small shift in the voltage dependence of charge movement: the average shift at S = 16 mM is <5 mV in the depolarizing direction.

Figure 7
Extracellular effect of low ionic strength solutions on charge movement. (A) Gating current traces from the cut-open oocyte clamp in extracellular control solution S = 325 mM are on the left. The right panel shows currents at S = 28 mM. (B) The corresponding ...

A very interesting observation in the extracellular effects of low S is that gating current kinetics are slowed considerably. Fig. 8 A shows gating current traces at 0 mV obtained before and after lowering the S of the extracellular solution. Both ON and OFF gating currents are slowed. The slowing of ON gating currents is seen in Fig. 8 B as an approximately twofold increase in τON at all voltages. The OFF gating currents are slowed down by a similar amount (Fig. 8 C). The voltage dependence of the OFF gating currents is consistent with that of the activation of macroscopic currents in the same extracellular solutions (high S). At membrane potentials where the channels begin to open, the OFF gating currents become slower because of the slow rate of exit from the open state (Zagotta et al. 1994; Schoppa and Sigworth 1998). The slowing of both ON and OFF gating currents by a similar amount is consistent with the absence of a shift in the equilibrium distribution of charge movement.

Figure 8
Comparison of gating current kinetics at high and low extracellular ionic strength. (A) Gating currents at 0 mV obtained with the cut-open voltage clamp. The faster trace was obtained at S = 325 mM and the slower trace corresponds to S = 16 mM. It is ...

These effects of a lowered S are not explained by a simple voltage shift of the kinetics, as predicted by electrostatic screening of surface charge. In experiments involving changes in external pH, Campbell and Hahin 1984 observed a similar slowing of kinetics of Na+ channel gating currents at low pH that was not a simple shift in the voltage axis. Clearly, not all ionic strength effects are mediated by the screening of fixed charges.

Electrostatic Calculations

Is it possible to give a mechanistic interpretation to the reduction of charge observed in low S in the intracellular part of the channel? In , we have presented the argument that the degree of coupling to the membrane potential and the gating charge is measured as the gating current. A reduction in S would be expected to reduce coupling by affecting the local potential that the gating charges sense. To interpret the experimental results within this formalism, we performed a calculation to try to account for the effects of S on gating currents in terms of a gating pore. For this purpose, the linearized Poisson-Boltzmann equation was solved in cylindrical coordinates using a finite difference algorithm to investigate the dependence of the local potential on the geometry of the membrane.

In this scheme, it is possible to set up a membrane surrounded by high dielectric constant regions that simulate the intracellular and extracellular solutions. Also a cavity of arbitrary shape and molecular dimensions can be made in the membrane (Fig. 9 A). This is meant to simulate the gating pore. By examining the local potential in this model pore, one can get an idea of the expected magnitude in the change of gating charge as a function of S and the shape and dimensions of the cavity. The dielectric constant is set to a value of 80 in solution and 2 in the membrane, and it is initially assumed that the dielectric constant in the cavity is the same as that of the bulk solution. The value of κ in the cavity is also set equal to its value in the adjacent solution, while κ is zero elsewhere in the membrane.

Figure 9
Numerical solutions of the linearized Poisson-Boltzmann equation in cylindrical coordinates for a cylindrical cavity in the membrane. (A) Schematic representation of the geometry used for the calculations. The grid dimensions were 0.5 Å in the ...

Fig. 9 B shows an example of such a calculation for the cylindrical cavity. Isopotential lines are shown in a slice through the center of the membrane cavity system. The calculation was done with a cavity of 3-Å radius (ra) and 25-Å depth in a membrane of 30 Å thickness. The intracellular value of S was changed from its high value of 318 mM (Debye length κ−1 = 7.6 Å) to values of 24 mM (κ−1 = 21 Å) and 12 mM (κ−1 = 30 Å). The extracellular value of S remained fixed at 318 mM. The effect that the cavity has on the membrane potential distribution is to increase the fraction of the potential that falls in the solution and in consequence, reduce the potential measured at the apex of the cavity ([var phi]a). Assuming that the gating charge moves between the cavity's apex and the external surface, this produces a reduced gating charge because the fraction of membrane potential that the gating charge traverses is now diminished and the difference in δ () between resting and activated states is also reduced. As S is lowered in the intracellular space, [var phi]a is further reduced. This is seen by an increase in the number of isopotential lines in the intracellular side (Fig. 9 B, right).

At a given pair of intra- and extracellular S values, the depth or the diameter of the cylindrical cavity was varied while maintaining the other constant at a given value. Fig. 9 C shows the value of [var phi]a in the 3-Å radius cylindrical cavity, as a function of the depth of the cavity at the three indicated values of S. The same data are transformed in Fig. 9 D to give the fractional reduction of potential produced upon going from S = 318 mM to 24 mM and 12 mM. This value, Δf, is the difference of [var phi]a at two values of S. The data points with the error bars are the experimentally measured charge reductions produced by changing intracellular ionic strength, and plotted arbitrarily at the depth value of 24 Å to fit the calculated curves.

The calculation was also performed in a cavity of depth 25 Å for various values of ra. The changes in ra have only a moderate effect on [var phi]a, as shown in Fig. 9 E. The reduction of [var phi]a is more pronounced with a smaller radius, but for both S = 12 mM and 24 mM at radii >6 Å, the reduction rapidly approaches the asymptotic value given by an infinite, thin membrane. The experimental data seem to be consistent with a cavity of a radius of 3 Å and a depth of 25 Å out of the total 30-Å membrane thickness. (Fig. 9 F). However, for a deeper cavity, the larger radius would also satisfy the data. In general, it is seen that the cavity must be narrow and deep to produce the observed Δf values.

The same kind of numeric calculation was performed using a truncated conical cavity. This geometry has an added parameter, which is the radius rm at the mouth of the cavity, and is presented schematically in Fig. 10 A. The value of ra was left constant at 3 Å to facilitate comparisons with other geometries, and the effect of varying the depth of the cavity with radii rm= 3, 6, and 10 Å was investigated. At a constant rm, the effects on the potential are qualitatively similar to that observed in the cylindrical cavity, i.e., [var phi]a diminishes as the cavity becomes deeper and is also diminished at a lowered S. As the value of rm is made larger, the depth that is necessary to account for experimental values is increased. The mouth aperture of the cone has a progressively more important effect as the cone becomes deeper. The data are best approximated with a cone of rm = 10 Å and a depth of the cavity of 28 Å (Fig. 10 A). Overall, the conical cavity produces smaller changes in [var phi]a than the cylindrical cavity, and it is necessary to have a deeper cone compared with a cylinder to account for the experimental observations. It seems that the progressively increasing radius from ra to rm in the truncated cone allows for less crowding of the electrical potential inside the cavity.

Figure 10
Numerical solutions of the linearized Poisson-Boltzmann equation for two different geometries. (A) Truncated conical cavity. The membrane thickness was 30 Å, and the cone radii were fixed at ra = 3 Å and rm = 10 Å as the cavity ...

Explaining Extracellular and Intracellular Effects

Since we have observed some charge reduction while reducing S in the extracellular face, we attempted to explain the effects of both intracellular and extracellular reductions of S with a calculation using a membrane with both internal and external cavities. Since the extracellular effects are smaller, we used a small cavity for the external face. At a given value of S, the potential reduction was now calculated as the difference between the potential at the apex of the internal cavity [var phi]a and the potential at the bottom of the external cavity [var phi]e. This difference is called Δfm and represents the effective membrane potential. The effect of going from a high to a low value of S is called ΔΔf and is calculated as the difference ΔΔf = Δfm(318)− Δfm(S).

As in previous calculations, the depth of the internal cavity Di was varied while keeping a fixed value of ra = 3 Å and a fixed value of the external cavity depth De = 3 Å (Fig. 10 B). The results of these calculations are qualitatively similar to those obtained with the internal cavity and the planar external face, but the reduction of potential ΔΔf produced by S = 12 mM is smaller than in the other geometries. If the calculation is repeated with an external cavity depth of 5 Å, the values of ΔΔf are even smaller. To try to explain the experimental results with this geometry, the value of Di has to be 23 Å, but the reduction in gating charge produced by lowering S to 12 mM is underestimated (Fig. 10 B). With an internal cavity depth Di = 23 Å and an external cavity depth De = 3 Å, and keeping the value of internal S at 325, the values of ΔΔf produced by changing external S are 2.2% at S = 28 mM and 2.6% at S = 16 mM. The experimentally observed reductions of the gating charge with the reduction of extracellular S are 2.3 ± 1.4% for S = 28 mM and 3.2 ± 1.2% for S = 16 mM. Nevertheless, it seems that if there is an external cavity, as in our double cavity system, this has to be much smaller than the internal cavity and the space between the external and internal cavities has to be a very small slab of ~4 Å thickness.

Effects of Model Parameters

It is likely that the dielectric constant of water in a pore-like cavity is different from that of bulk water. Sansom et al. 1997 have shown that the helix dipoles of a helix bundle can produce polarization saturation of water molecules, effectively reducing the value of epsilon. This effect may be smaller in anti-parallel helix bundles, as those expected to form the walls of the gating pore. Nevertheless, we were interested in testing the effect of having a smaller epsilon in the internal cavity and set up a membrane system with truncated conical external and internal cavities in which the value of epsilon in the internal cavity is 30. The value of κ in the internal cavity is changed accordingly (). The potential at the apex of the internal cavity [var phi]a and on the base of the external cavity [var phi]e are reduced by the low value of epsilon. The potential in the membrane more readily penetrates the internal cavity, and the reduction of S produces larger effects in the values of Δfm. Fig. 11 B shows the dependence of ΔΔf on the depth of a cylindrical double cavity of radius ra = 3 Å. The main effect of having a reduced dielectric constant in the internal cavity is that the percent reductions of the effective membrane potential ΔΔf are larger than in the same geometry with epsilon = 80. As was noted previously (Fig. 10 B), having an external as well as an internal cavity in the membrane system produced smaller reductions of a membrane potential. Now with a reduced epsilon, the system better accounts for the experimental observations. Using the truncated conical double cavities, the measured reductions of gating charge produced by reducing S, either internally or externally, can be explained simultaneously by having an external cavity of depth De = 3 Å and an internal cavity of depth Di= 20 Å, with radius ra = 3 Å and internal mouth opening rm = 10 Å (Fig. 11 C).

Figure 11
Calculated effects of S in the double cavity system with low dielectric constant (epsilon = 30) in the internal cavity. (A) The radius ra is the same for the external and internal cavity, and the mouth radius rm was varied. The geometry of the system ...

It seems that allowing for a reduced dielectric constant of 30, the double cavity system with the truncated cones provides a good description of both the intracellular and extracellular reductions of charge. The use of epsilon = 30 for the solution in the cavity seems reasonable in view of the calculations of Sansom et al. 1997, and also allows for a larger cavity with a minimum radius ra = 3 Å, which is in agreement with the ability of large MTS reagents to modify S4 residues. The dimensions of the external and internal cavities reduce the region of membrane potential focusing to a septum of ~7 Å thickness. In the normal high S solutions (~300 mM), the drop of potential across the septum in Fig. 11 C is 91% of the full membrane potential.

We have used 30 Å as the thickness of the hydrophobic core of the bilayer and the height of the channel protein. This is close to the ~35 Å height of the KcsA channel (Doyle et al. 1998) and 26 Å for gramicidin (Roux and Karplus 1991). To investigate the effect of the (unknown) size of the Shaker channel, we performed calculations like those shown in Fig. 11 A, but used a membrane–channel thickness of 40 Å. As can be seen in Fig. 11 D, the effects of a deep cavity are qualitatively similar to those of the 30-Å system, but the cavity has to be as deep as 25 Å to account for the experimental observations. This means that the effect of increasing the thickness of the membrane–channel system is to scale up the dimensions of the cavity. In this case, the expected thickness of the septum increases from 7 to 13 Å.

Another issue is related to the value of the dielectric constant of the protein, epsilonp. Molecular dynamics calculations in soluble proteins have suggested that the value of epsilonp should be larger than that of the lipid bilayer. Antosiewicz et al. 1996 have shown that in calculating the pKa of titrable groups of proteins in aqueous solutions, values for epsilonp of 4–8, and perhaps as high as 20 provide better agreement of the MD calculation with actual data. However, the issue of the value of epsilonp is an open one and, recently, more elaborate calculations have shown that a value of epsilonp = 2 is appropriate (Sheinerman et al. 2000). Fig. 11 E shows results from a calculation as in Fig. 11 C using an epsilonp of 4 for the membrane–channel system with a thickness of 30 Å. As can be seen, the higher value of epsilonp reduces the size of the cavity necessary to approximate the experimentally observed effects of S; a predicted difference between S = 24 mM and S = 12 mM become less marked. This can be explained because the higher value of epsilonp produces less decay of potential across the protein septum.

Finally, we address an issue related to the calculation of the effects of ionic strength using LPB theory. It has been suggested that the use of the Poisson-Boltzmann formalism is inadequate in the vicinity of a dielectric boundary because of a strong repulsive force on ions close to it. In a recent Brownian dynamics study, Moy et al. 2000 have shown that within a few angstroms of a dielectric boundary there is a depletion of ions because of the repulsive reaction field. The repulsion increases as the charge squared and, therefore, is incorrectly described by a continuum of charge. To first order a small depletion of ions near a dielectric boundary is negligible in terms of ionic screening, because anions and cations are depleted equally; however, when the reaction potential exceeds the value of kT, the effects will be substantial. Consider a monovalent ion in a medium of dielectric constant epsilon1 approaching a plane boundary with a medium of dielectric epsilon2. Using the method of image charges, the energy from the reaction field is seen to be

equation M14

where r is the distance from the ion to the plane. Letting epsilon1= 80 and assuming epsilon2 to be much smaller, U(r) becomes equal to kT at ~1.7 Å. For epsilon1 =30 and epsilon2 = 2, the critical distance becomes r = 4.1 Å. Because of this depletion of ions near the boundary, the effects we see in our calculations with cavity radii on the order of 3 Å are probably better modeled with a cavity radius a few angstroms larger. To account for the possibility of such an effect, we introduced an ion exclusion region, where the value of κ is set equal to zero, represented by a slab 4 Å thick surrounding the dielectric boundary in the internal cavity and 2 Å in the external cavity. Fig. 12 shows that the introduction of a cutoff region is equivalent to a reduction of the overall size of the cavity, so that the experimental data are approximated by a much deeper cavity. If the dielectric repulsion of ions in the cavity is significant, this means that the best cavity would have a radius ra = 6 Å, a mouth radius rm = 14 Å, and an internal depth Di = 24 Å. In this case, the septum is reduced to a thickness of only 3 Å.

Figure 12
Effects of the inclusion of an ion depletion area in calculations using the conical geometry. Calculation with a bigger cone radius (ra= 6 Å) and mouth radius (rm = 14 Å) in the double-cone system. The external cavity depth is 3 Å. ...


In this paper, we have shown that reducing the ionic strength S causes small but reproducible reductions in the measured gating charge. An approximate 10-fold reduction of internal S produces an 8.7% reduction of gating charge. These effects continue at even lower values of S (Table ). A similar reduction of external S produces a much smaller reduction of 2.2%. It seems that the low S environment affects the local electric field and, thus, reduces the coupling between it and the intrinsic voltage-sensing charges, producing the observed reduction of the gating charge. The magnitude of the charge reduction is significantly larger than what is expected from a voltage sensor in a simple planar membrane (Table ). We have also shown that the Q(V) curves have only small shifts in the presence of low S solutions, either on the intracellular or extracellular sides.

Table 2
Gating Charge Reduction at Low Ionic Strength

Surface Charge Effects

Previous studies have dealt with the effects of low S on ionic currents of voltage-activated Na+ channels, inferring the existence of a negative surface charge in the intracellular and extracellular region of the channel and the surrounding membrane. This charge is thought to affect the gating and permeation properties by a simple electrostatic mechanism (Frankenhaeuser and Hodgkin 1957; Chandler et al. 1965; Hille et al. 1975a,Hille et al. 1975b; Cukierman 1991).

Those experiments in which the effects of S were investigated relied on the measurement of ionic currents and their voltage dependence. In most cases, a shift in the voltage dependence was observed that was interpreted in terms of the surface potential theory, where the surface charge affects channel gating and permeation by setting up a bias potential that is superimposed on the membrane potential. If the fixed charge is negative, then a reduction of S is expected to produce a negative shift for changes at the extracellular medium and positive shifts for changes in the intracellular face. Because the shifts are taken to be the result of a bias potential, they should be of the same magnitude for steady-state and kinetic properties alike; but in most cases, this expectation has not been fulfilled. Several studies have shown that shifts of kinetic and steady-state parameters in the Na+ channel are correlated with the occupancy of the pore and can be explained by a model that does not involve surface charge effects. Studies of the magnitude of the screening effects of calcium on Na+ channels reached the conclusion that not only the surface charge effects of Ca2+ are small, but they also seem to be inconsistent with the canonical form of surface charge theory. It is possible to account for all the effects of Ca2+ by an occupancy model in which Ca2+ occupation of the pore is needed for the channel to close (Boccaccio et al. 1998; Armstrong 1999).

In our experiments on Shaker potassium channels, ionic current activation is shifted in the hyperpolarizing direction upon reduction of internal S, by 6 mV at 24 mM and by 10 mV at 12 mM. The polarity of these shifts could be readily explained if the surface charge in the intracellular part of the channel is assumed to be positive and quite small. According to Gouy-Chapmann theory, it is possible to calculate an approximate charge density from the shifts of voltage dependence of 6.4 × 10−4 eo2. Similarly, Elinder et al. 1998 have estimated an extracellular surface charge of −27 × 10−4 eo2, which is roughly explained by the negatively charged amino acid residues on the external surface of the channel protein. Another explanation is that the removal of permeant ions from the intracellular space affects the equilibrium of the opening transition by an allosteric mechanism and is thus producing the shift. Our low S solutions had reduced K+ concentrations. It is possible that absence of K+ at the inside of the channel changes the energetics of the opening conformational change by a few kT units, which would be sufficient to produce the observed shift of voltage dependence.

Finally, it seems that the actions of divalent ions in Shaker gating currents are also inconsistent with the surface charge theory. Raising external Ca2+ does not modify charge movement, while the action of Ba2+ is explained by a selective acceleration of the rate of channel closing (Hurst et al. 1997). It is possible that the amount of fixed charge in potassium channels differs from that of their sodium counterparts and, in consequence, many of the effects previously attributed to surface charge screening in potassium channels, can be explained at least as well by gating effects of permeant or partially permeant ions. We conclude that surface charge effects on Shaker are small.

Ionic Strength Effects on Kinetics

We have shown that the extracellular reduction of S has a qualitatively and quantitatively different effect on gating currents than intracellular changes. The time constant of decay of ON and OFF gating currents is made slower in reduced extracellular S. The overall slowing of kinetics is inconsistent with a simple surface charge mechanism, but is similar to the effect of low pH on Na+ channel gating currents (Campbell and Hahin 1984).

It is possible that our low S solutions, having an increased viscosity, affect the gating kinetics by changing the energy barrier for one or multiple transitions. It has been shown that increased solution viscosity affects protein dynamics by a damping effect on the internal motion of the protein, affecting the energy barrier for a particular transition (Beece et al. 1980). In Shaker channels, exposure to hyperosmotic solutions slows the kinetics of activation of macroscopic currents, and the result has been interpreted in a similar way, as an increase of the energy barrier of one or multiple transitions (Starkus et al. 1995). The absence of a shift of the Q(V) relationship is consistent with the observed slowing of both the ON and OFF gating currents by a similar amount. Also, the absence of a shift in the voltage axis is consistent with experiments in Shaker involving the effects of divalent cations (Hurst et al. 1997). In those experiments, the gating currents also did not change voltage dependence in the absence or presence of divalent ions, which would be expected to produce surface charge screening effects.

A Cavity Explains Asymmetric Ionic Strength Effects

Reductions in intracellular ionic strength produce large reductions in the apparent gating charge. We have ascribed this effect to the potential drop in an intracellular aqueous cavity. However, it should be noted that a cavity is not required to explain the effect: a planar membrane that is sufficiently thin (say 5 Å) can also account for the intracellular effects, as shown in Fig. 9 E. The problem with a thin membrane (or equivalently, a very broad cavity) is that such a membrane would produce an equally large sensitivity to extracellular ionic strength changes, which is not observed. In the end, it is the asymmetry of the ionic strength effects that requires us to postulate a restricted cavity on the intracellular surface of the channel.

The estimated dimensions of the intracellular cavity depend on the assumed values for dielectric constants. Letting epsilon = 80 for the cavity as well as bulk solutions and epsilon = 2 for the membrane and protein interior in a membrane of 30 Å thickness, the effects are accounted for by a cylindrical cavity of ~25-Å depth and 3-Å radius. The calculations performed with a truncated conical cavity show that an even deeper cavity would be necessary to explain the effects of low S on gating current.

When we considered having a reduced dielectric constant epsilon in the internal cavity, as suggested by previous theoretical work, the geometry that incorporates an internal and an external cavity seems to provide a good explanation for both the intracellular and extracellular effects of lowered S. Meanwhile, the question remains as to what is the correct value of epsilon to use to describe the interior of a membrane protein. It was originally suggested that a value of 8 and as a high as 20 was necessary to account for the pKa of soluble proteins. More recently, work that explicitly treats protein conformational changes suggested that an epsilon value of 4 (Havranek and Harbury 1999) or 2 (Misra et al. 1998) is more appropriate to capture the electronic polarizability effects that contribute more significantly to the dielectric properties of a protein. Also, a recent study (Dwyer et al. 2000) shows that the large values of epsilon encountered in the interior of proteins, may arise from water penetration into the core of the molecule.

Validity of the Continuum Theory

The Poisson-Boltzmann equation embodies a mean-field theory, in which ion concentrations are represented by a smeared out continuum of charge. Two problems can be imagined to arise because of the mean-field approximation in the present context. First, the dimensions of the internal cavity (e.g., the one in Fig. 12) are so small that at a concentration of 24 mM, the cavity is occupied by an ion with a probability of only 0.037. At S = 318 mM, the occupancy increases to 0.5. It is clear that the charge measured in the external circuit will be a quantity that fluctuates as ions diffuse into and out of the cavity on a nanosecond time scale. However, this is no problem because the gating charge as a function of potential is an equilibrium quantity (at least on the time scale of a few milliseconds in our measurements) and, therefore, the time-averaged charge movement measurement is appropriate.

The other problem with the use of a mean-field theory concerns the reaction field experienced by individual ions. Although the Poisson-Boltzmann theory is quite successful in describing ion behavior in bulk solutions and also at planar interfaces (Bockris and Reddy 1973), the theory does not describe reaction field effects as individual ions approach dielectric boundaries. Moy et al. 2000 have demonstrated a depletion of ions due to the repulsive reaction field that increases as charge squared and, therefore, is incorrectly described by a continuum of charge. We have included this effect as a depletion area around the dielectric boundary, and show that the effect may be more pronounced in the low dielectric constant internal cavity. This depletion region is similar to the volume exclusion region of 2–4 Å which is commonly used in electrostatic and molecular dynamics simulations (Alexov and Gunner 1997; Misra et al. 1998).

Finally, it should be emphasized that we have used only the linearized form of the Poisson-Boltzmann equation. Because it is linear, this equation allows very great simplifications through superposition. We are interested only in the changes in potential due to the applied membrane potential, so that superposition allows us to neglect any effects of fixed charges in the system. It also allows us to present the computed potentials simply as fractions of the membrane potential. The linearized equation is an approximation, valid for potentials differing less than about kT/e0 from the bulk solution potential. Very close to fixed charges, this approximation will not hold, but the polarity of the error is not obvious: at moderate electric field strengths, the screening effect is expected to be larger; but, at high field strengths, the finite ion radii and saturation of water dipoles will reduce the screening effect. Because the detailed structure of the protein is not known, we take the linearized equation as an accessible and reasonable approximation to the actual problem.

Shape of the Cavities

The exact geometry of the cavity would be expected to be much more complex than the models presented here, but the simple existence of a cavity seems to be enough to sharply focus the electric field into a small region of the protein, which is not possible in a simple planar membrane. We suggest that the internal cavity is very deep and relatively narrow while the external cavity, if any, is small. Our favorite model is an internal conical cavity of ~20-Å depth and external mouth radius of 10 Å and internal radius of 3 Å. This internal cavity is large enough to give access to the relatively large (6-Å diam by 10 Å in length) cysteine modifying agents used in other experiments (Karlin and Akabas 1998). The cavity may be larger if the magnitude of ion repulsion effects in the dielectric boundary are considerable (up to rm =14 Å, ra = 6 Å, and a depth of 24 Å; Fig. 11 D). The volume of this cavity would be large enough to contain a large number of water molecules. The region of membrane potential focusing, as suggested by these calculations, may be as small as 3 Å in thickness and not larger than 10 Å. It is possible that this region is formed at the intersection of a number of the α-helices, which may form the core of one of the channel's subunits. In our favored geometry (Fig. 12), the low dielectric septum is only 3 Å thick, which is in agreement with suggestions from other experiments (Starace et al. 1997).

Fig. 13 presents a cartoon representation of one subunit of the Shaker channel in two conformations. The cavity would be formed by a bundle of α-helices, and one of those helices would be S4 itself. Most α-helices in bundles cross at an angle of between 11° and 20° (Chothia et al. 1981; Son and Sanson 1999), although the helices in the KcsA channel come together at a larger angle (Doyle et al., 1999). Given the results of our electrostatic calculations with the conical cavity of reduced epsilon, the dimensions of the best cavity are 20 Å in the mouth opening and 6 Å at the apex. This corresponds to a crossing angle of ~40°.

Figure 13
Cartoon of the possible geometry of the gating pore and voltage sensor. The S4 helix is represented by the structure proposed in the model of Durell et al. 1998 as a space-filling α-helix, the charged residues are in black. The lightly shaded ...

Since the extracellular effects of reduced S are small, and the electrostatic calculations suggest that using a small (3–5 Å) external cavity is appropriate, we suggest that the helix bundle actually forms in the external third of the membrane, just opposite to the form the bundle crossing occurs in the KcsA channel, which happens in the intracellular region. This disposition would form a long internal cavity and a short external cavity (Fig. 13). In summary, this structural cartoon is consistent with the data presented here and that of other groups. It incorporates a conical cavity whose size is consistent with that of cysteine-modifying compounds. Gating charges are displaced across a thin septum, allowing a small movement, such as a helix rotation, to give rise to the large gating charge movement of >3 eo per channel subunit.

figure JGP8266.s1


We wish to thank Y.-Y. Yan for expert technical assistance. We thank B. Roux (Cornell Medical Center, NY, NY), and Y. Yang and Q.-X. Jiang (Yale University) for discussions and helpful comments during the course of this work.

This study was supported by the National Institutes of Health grant NS 21501 to F.J. Sigworth.


  • Aggarwal S.K., MacKinnon R. Contribution of the S4 segment to gating charge in the Shaker K+ channel. Neuron. 1996;16:1169–1177. [PubMed]
  • Alexov E.G., Gunner M.R. Incorporating protein conformational flexibility into the calculation of pH-dependent protein properties. Biophys. J. 1997;74:2075–2093. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Antosiewicz J., McCammon J.A., Gilson M.K. The determinants of pKas in proteins. Biochemistry. 1996;35:7819–7833. [PubMed]
  • Armstrong C.M. Distinguishing surface effects of calcium ion from pore-occupancy effects in Na+ channels. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci USA. 1999;96:4158–4163. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Baker O.S., Larsson H.P., Mannuzzu L.M., Isacoff E.Y. Three transmembrane conformations and sequence-dependent displacement of the S4 domain in Shaker K+ channel gating. Neuron. 1998;20:1283–1294. [PubMed]
  • Baukrowitz T., Yellen G. Use-dependent blockers and exit rate of the last ion from the multi-ion pore of a K+ channel. Science. 1996;271:653–656. [PubMed]
  • Beece D., Eisenstein L., Frauenfelder H., Good D., Marden M.C., Reinisch L., Reynolds A.H., Sorensen L.B., Yue K.T. Solvent viscosity and protein dynamics. Biochemistry. 1980;19:5147–5157. [PubMed]
  • Boccaccio A., Moran O., Conti F. Calcium dependent shifts of Na+ channel activation correlated with the state dependence of calcium-binding to the pore. Eur. Biophys. J. 1998;27:558–566. [PubMed]
  • Bockris, J.O.M., and A.K.N. Reddy. 1973. Modern Electrochemistry. Plenum Press, New York. Second edition. 235–250.
  • Campbell D.T., Hahin R. Altered sodium and gating current kinetics in frog skeletal muscle caused by low external pH. J. Gen. Physiol. 1984;84:771–788. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Cha A., Bezanilla F. Characterizing voltage-dependent conformational changes in the Shaker K+ channel with fluorescence. Neuron. 1997;19:1127–1140. [PubMed]
  • Chandler W.K., Hodgkin A.L., Meves H. The effect of changing the internal solution on sodium inactivation and related phenomena in giant axons. J. Physiol. 1965;180:821–836. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Chothia C., Levitt M., Richardson D. Helix to helix packing in proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 1981;145:215–250. [PubMed]
  • Conti F., Stühmer W. Quantal charge redistributions accompanying the structural transitions of sodium channels. Eur. Biophys. J. 1989;17:53–59. [PubMed]
  • Crouzy S.C., Sigworth F.J. Fluctuations in ion channel gating currents. Analysis of nonstationary shot noise. Biophys. J. 1993;64:68–76. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Cukierman S. Asymmetric electrostatic effects on the gating of rat brain sodium channels in planar lipid membranes. Biophys. J. 1991;60:845–855. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Doyle D.A., Cabral J.M., Pfuetzner R.A., Kuo A., Gulbis J.M., Cohen S.L., Chait B.T., MacKinnon R. The structure of the potassium channelmolecular basis of K+ conduction and selectivity. Science. 1998;280:69–77. [PubMed]
  • Durell S.R., Hao Y., Guy H.R. Structural models of the transmembrane region of voltage-gated and other K+ channels in open, closed, and inactivated conformations. J. Struct. Biol. 1998;121:263–284. [PubMed]
  • Dwyer J.J., Gittis A.G., Karp D.A., Lattman E.E., Spencer D.S., Sites W.E., Garcia-Moreno E.B. High apparent dielectric constants in the interior of a protein reflect water penetration. Biophys. J. 2000;79:1610–1620. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Elinder F., Liu Y., Arhem P. Divalent cation effects on the Shaker K channel suggest a pentapeptide sequence as determinant of functional surface charge. J. Memb. Biol. 1998;165:183–189. [PubMed]
  • Frankenhaeuser B., Hodgkin A.L. The action of calcium on the electrical properties of squid axons. J. Physiol. 1957;137:218–244. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Goldstein S.A. A structural vignette common to voltage sensors and conduction porescanaliculi. Neuron. 1996;16:717–722. [PubMed]
  • Havranek J.J., Harbury P.B. Tanford-Kirkwood electrostatics for protein modeling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1999;96:11145–11150. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Heginbotham L., MacKinnon R. Conduction properties of the cloned Shaker K+ channel. Biophys. J. 1993;65:2089–2096. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Heinemann S.H., Conti F. Nonstationary noise analysis and application to patch clamp recordings. Methods Enzymol. 1992;207:131–148. [PubMed]
  • Hille B., Ritchie J.M., Strichartz G.R. The effect of surface charge on the nerve membrane on the action of tetrodotoxin and saxitoxin in frog myelinated nerve J. Physiol. 2501975. 34P–35P.35Pa. [PubMed]
  • Hille B., Woodhull A.M., Shapiro B.I. Negative surface charge near sodium channels of nervedivalent ions, monovalent ions, and pH Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 2701975. 301–318.318b. [PubMed]
  • Hirschberg B., Rovner A., Lieberman M., Patlak J. Transfer of twelve charges is needed to open skeletal muscle Na+ channels. J. Gen. Physiol. 1995;106:1053–1068. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Hoshi T., Zagotta W.N., Aldrich R.W. Biophysical and molecular mechanisms of Shaker potassium channel inactivation. Science. 1990;250:533–538. [PubMed]
  • Hurst R.S., Roux M.J., Toro L., Stefani E. External barium influences the gating charge movement of Shaker potassium channels. Biophys. J. 1997;72:77–84. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Islas L.D., Sigworth F.J. Voltage sensitivity and gating charge in Shaker and Shab family potassium channels. J. Gen. Physiol. 1999;114:723–741. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Jordan P.C., Bacquet R.J., McCammon J.A., Tran P. How electrolyte shielding influences the electrical potential in transmembrane ion channels. Biophys. J. 1989;55:1041–1052. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Karlin A., Akabas M.H. Substituted-cysteine accessibility method. Methods Enzymol. 1998;293:123–145. [PubMed]
  • Klapper I., Hagstrom R., Fine R., Sharp K., Honig B. Focusing of electric fields in the active site of Cu-Zn superoxide dismutaseeffects of ionic strength and amino-acid modification. Proteins. 1986;1:47–59. [PubMed]
  • Larsson H.P., Baker O.S., Dhillon D.S., Isacoff E.Y. Transmembrane movement of the Shaker K+ channel S4. Neuron. 1996;16:387–397. [PubMed]
  • Mannuzzu L.M., Moronne M.M., Isacoff E.Y. Direct physical measure of conformational rearrangement underlying potassium channel gating. Science. 1996;271:213–216. [PubMed]
  • Misra V.K., Hecht J.L., Yang A.-S., Honig B. Electrostatic contributions to the binding energy of the λcl repressor to DNA. Biophys. J. 1998;75:2262–2273. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Moy G., Corry B., Kuyucak S., Chung S.-H. Tests of continuum theories as models of ion channels. I. Poisson-Boltzmann theory versus Brownian dynamics. Biophys. J. 2000;78:2349–2363. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Olcese R., Latorre R., Toro L., Bezanilla F., Stefani E. Correlation between charge movement and ionic current during slow inactivation in Shaker K+ channels. J. Gen. Physiol. 1997;110:579–589. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Perozo E., MacKinnon R., Bezanilla F., Stefani E. Gating currents from a nonconducting mutant reveal open-closed conformations in Shaker K+ channels. Neuron. 1993;11:353–358. [PubMed]
  • Rashin A., Iofin A.M., Honig B. Internal cavities and buried waters in globular proteins. Biochemistry. 1986;25:3619–3625. [PubMed]
  • Rayner M.D., Starkus J.G., Ruben P.C., Alicata D.A. Voltage-sensitive and solvent-sensitive processes in ion channel gating. Kinetic effects of hyperosmolar media on activation and deactivation of sodium channels. Biophys. J. 1992;61:96–108. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Roux B. Influence of the membrane potential on the free energy of an intrinsic protein. Biophys. J. 1997;73:2980–2989. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Roux B., Karplus M. Ion transport in a model gramicidin channel. Structure and thermodynamics. Biophys J. 1991;59:961–981. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Sansom M.S., Smith G.R., Adcock C., Biggin P.C. The dielectric properties of water within model transbilayer pores. Biophys. J. 1997;73:2404–2415. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Schoppa N.E., Sigworth F.J. Activation of Shaker potassium channels. III. An activation gating model for wild-type and V2 mutant channels. J. Gen. Physiol. 1998;111:313–342. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Seoh S.A., Sigg D., Papazian D.M., Bezanilla F. Voltage-sensing residues in the S2 and S4 segments of the Shaker K+ channel. Neuron. 1996;16:1159–1167. [PubMed]
  • Sheinerman F.B., Norel R., Honig B. Electrostatic aspects of protein-protein interactions. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2000;10:153–159. [PubMed]
  • Sigworth F.J. The variance of sodium current fluctuations at the node of Ranvier. J. Physiol. 1980;307:97–129. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Sigworth F.J. Voltage gating of ion channels. Q. Rev. Biophys. 1994;27:1–40. [PubMed]
  • Son H.S., Sanson M.S.P. Simulation of the packing of idealized transmembrane α-helix bundles. Eur. Biophys. J. 1999;28:489–498. [PubMed]
  • Starace D.M., Stefani E., Bezanilla F. Voltage-dependent proton transport by the voltage sensor of the Shaker K+ channel. Neuron. 1997;19:1319–1327. [PubMed]
  • Starkus J.G., Schlief T., Rayner M.D., Heinemann S.H. Unilateral exposure of Shaker B potassium channels to hyperosmolar solutions. Biophys. J. 1995;69:860–872. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Taglialatela M., Toro L., Stefani E. A novel voltage clamp to record small, fast currents from ion channels expressed in Xenopus oocytes. Biophys. J. 1992;61:78–82. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Yang N., Horn R. Evidence for voltage-dependent S4 movement in sodium channels. Neuron. 1995;15:213–218. [PubMed]
  • Yang N., George A.L., Jr., Horn R. Molecular basis of charge movement in voltage-gated sodium channels. Neuron. 1996;16:113–122. [PubMed]
  • Yang Y., Yan Y., Sigworth F.J. How does the W434F mutation block current in Shaker potassium channels? J. Gen. Physiol. 1997;109:779–789. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Zagotta W.N., Hoshi T., Dittman J., Aldrich R.W. Shaker potassium channel gating. IITransitions in the activation pathway. J. Gen. Physiol. 1994;103:279–319. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Zimmerberg J., Bezanilla F., Parsegian V.A. Solute inaccessible aqueous volume changes during opening of the potassium channel of the squid giant axon. Biophys. J. 1990;57:1049–1064. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press


Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...


Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...