![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||
Copyright © the College of Family Physicians of Canada Zopiclone Is it a pharmacologic agent for abuse? General practitioner, a medical microbiologist, and a Professor in the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver Correspondence to: Dr N. Cimolai, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Children’s and Women’s Health Centre of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6H 3V4; telephone 604 271-9321; e-mail ncimolai/at/interchange.ubc.ca This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract OBJECTIVE To determine whether the hypnosedative drug zopiclone could be an agent for abuse. SOURCES OF INFORMATION Using MEDLINE and PubMed, English-language medical literature was systematically reviewed for reports of direct drug abuse and addiction. A review was also conducted for clinical trials or patient series that discussed issues of addiction or rebound effects. MAIN MESSAGE Evidence of drug abuse and dependency was found in case reports and small patient series. Dependency symptoms of severe rebound, severe anxiety, tremor, palpitations, tachycardia, and seizures were observed in some patients after withdrawal. Abuse occurred more commonly among patients with previous drug abuse or psychiatric illnesses. Many clinical trials have found evidence of rebound insomnia after recommended dosages were stopped, albeit for a minority of patients. Comparative studies of zopiclone and benzodiazepines or other “Z” drugs are conflicting. CONCLUSION Zopiclone has the potential for being an agent of abuse and addiction. While many have suggested that the addictive potential for this and other “Z” drugs is less than for most benzodiazepines, caution should be taken when prescribing this agent for insomnia. Ideally, prescriptions should be given for a short period of time and within the recommended dosage guidelines. RÉSUMÉ OBJECTIF Déterminer si l’agent hypnosédatif zopiclone présente un risque d’accoutumance. SOURCE DE L’INFORMATION À l’aide de MEDLINE et de PubMed, on a effectué une revue systématique de la littérature anglaise sur des cas de toxicomanie et d’accoutumance de ce type. On a également relevé les essais cliniques et les séries de patients relatifs à l’accoutumance et àl’effet rebond. PRINCIPAL MESSAGE On a trouvé des rapports de cas et des petites séries de patients décrivant des cas de toxicomanie et d’accoutumance. Chez certains patients en sevrage, on a observé de graves symptômes de rebond et d’anxiété, de tremblement, de palpitations, de tachycardie et de convulsions. Les patients avec antécédents de toxicomanie ou de maladie psychiatrique étaient plus susceptibles de toxicomanie. Plusieurs essais cliniques ont observé chez un petit nombre de patients de l’insomnie rebond à l’arrêt d’un traitement aux doses recommandées. Les études comparant la zopiclone aux benzodiazépines et aux autres médicaments de type «Z» sont contradictoires. CONCLUSION La zopiclone a le potentiel d’entraîner de l’accoutumance et de la toxicomanie. Même si plusieurs auteurs donnent à penser que le risque de toxicomanie avec cet agent et les autres médicaments de type «Z» est moins élevé qu’avec la plupart des benzodiazépines, il y a lieu d’être prudent lorsqu’on le prescrit pour l’insomnie. Idéalement, ces prescriptions devraient être de courte durée et respecter les doses recommandées. Case
Zopiclone is a commonly used hypnosedative that has been mainly promoted as a sleep aid.1 It is available in several generic formulations in Canada but has been marketed under the trade names Imovane and Rhovane. Zopiclone is one of the “Z” drug sedative-hypnotics and became clinically available in the mid 1980s. (Others include zaleplon [Starnoc in Canada and Sonata in the United States], zolpidem [Ambien in the United States], and eszopiclone [S-isomer of zopiclone; Lunesta in the United States].) It is not one of the benzodiazepine drugs but has many similarities to them when used for sleep. These include decreased latency to sleep initiation, increased duration of sleep, and reduced episodes of awakening. There was hope that “Z” drugs would be less addictive or less associated with post-use rebound than benzodiazepines.2 Chemically, zopiclone is a cyclopyrrolone.3 It is a type A γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptor agonist and therefore enhances GABA-related neuronal inhibition. Benzodiazepines also bind to and affect the function of GABA receptors. Few interactions with other drugs are documented.4 Zopiclone is typically prescribed in the range of 5 mg to 7.5 mg daily and at 3.75 mg daily for the elderly. While zopiclone is a highly effective sleep aid, there is controversy about the extent of its addiction potential. In practice, zopiclone is often used for treating insomnia, but it is not uncommon for patients with drug-seeking behaviour to request it. Although recommended for short-term treatment of insomnia,5 it is also not uncommon for patients, including the elderly, to take the drug nightly or continuously for many months. When discussing potential addiction to zopiclone use with their physicians, some prospective patients say they have been told it is not addictive. The costs and consequences of insomnia in the Canadian population have been estimated.6 From 5% to 30% of any particular population might be affected. In response, a considerable amount of hypnosedatives is prescribed yearly. Studies show the use of benzodiazepines and “Z” drugs to be as high as 5% to 30% among the elderly.7,8 Sources of information Using MEDLINE and PubMed, English-language medical literature was systematically reviewed for reports of direct drug abuse and addiction. A review was also conducted for clinical trials or patient series that discussed issues of addiction or rebound effects. Main message Zopiclone has quickly gained acceptance by practitioners and patients.9 In Alberta it is now the most frequently dispensed hypnosedative agent (47.4% of such agents compared with 0.1% to 28.7% for individual benzodiazepines).10 Investigators have found substantial increases in the use of zopiclone in Canada in the years 1996–1997, 1998–1999, and 2000–2001.11 It appears that the increases might have come at the expense of declining use of some benzodiazepines. In a 2003 lay review12 of Canadian pharmaceuticals, zopiclone ranked 30th among the top 100 generic drug products sold (nearly 1.5 million prescriptions of generic zopiclone), and the brand name Imovane ranked 74th (more than 500 000 prescriptions) of 100 brand-name drug products sold in Canada; only Ativan ranked higher (14th; approximately 2.5 million prescriptions) as a brand-name hypnosedative.12 Initial reports have proposed that zopiclone did not cause rebound or withdrawal phenomena or dependence.13–15 Postmarketing surveillance reports have been favourable.16,17 Some have indicated that “Z” drugs were less likely to be habit forming than benzodiazepines.18–20 However, animal data support the potential for addiction.21 Although not much has been published on this topic, a somewhat different picture has emerged with the few anecdotes, case series, and controlled studies. Parallels with other addictive substances have been heralded and reviewed.22,23 Table 1 provides examples of zopiclone abuse and addiction.24–31 In some circumstances, the drug was initiated at a standard dose of 7.5 mg daily but then increased. Most patients taking the drug suffered from pre-existing addiction or chemical abuse, or from underlying psychiatric disorders. Withdrawal symptoms were reported in several of these anecdotes, including cravings, severe rebound insomnia, anxiety or panic attacks, weakness, tremor, palpitations, and tachycardia. Withdrawal seizures were also recorded.
Addicts report that ingesting zopiclone and alcohol together heightens euphoria.27 In one report,24 use of zopiclone appeared to instigate a relapse into narcotic use. The drug has become well known in addict circles,32 and in the United Kingdom, the tablets have been labeled as zim-zims.27 Drug abusers have also used zopiclone as a replacement for benzodiazepines. With many generic versions becoming available, the cost of zopiclone on the street has decreased. Oral use of zopiclone predominates, but intravenous use has also been reported. In clinical practice, other patients are possibly at risk for dependence, especially after prolonged use. Table 2 also provides some insight from various studies.32–50 Some of the data pose contradictions; however, rebound insomnia and withdrawal symptoms soon after cessation are not uncommon whether patients took the usual dose or excessive doses. Symptoms might also occur despite a tapering of the dose. As with benzodiazepines, zopiclone was recognized as a potential replacement for alcohol. These phenomena occurred with what would have been considered standard daily doses. One addiction centre reported that 5.1% of addicts presenting to addiction centres admitted to zopiclone addiction.50
Zopiclone will continue to be prescribed for insomnia given that most believe, generally and scientifically, that it is associated with fewer clinical problems than benzodiazepines.18 Some even believe zopiclone is not addictive at all. In a recent, although small, survey51 of 40 British psychiatrists, zopiclone was found to be commonly prescribed; however, many respondents were unaware of its dependence potential. The Compendium of Pharmaceuticals and Specialties warns of potential addiction.5 It also recommends limiting the agent’s use (to approximately 7 to 10 days). Although the initial manufacturer’s recommendations include limits for length of therapy, long-term use in geriatric or general populations is not uncommon. Some have argued that the frequency of “Z” drug misuse must be low given the many prescriptions written and the few case reports published worldwide.52 However, an Internet source53 has enumerated 24 people who have sought advice regarding zopiclone dependency, and this number rivals the total available case reports cited worldwide in the medical literature. Because some drug abusers do not seek treatment, the true frequency of abuse or dependence is certainly higher than reported. Conclusion Physicians prescribing zopiclone should have the same concerns as they would for prescribing benzodiazepines (Table 3,54). Ideally, use should be short-term; long-term use must be monitored carefully. Physicians are also advised to be cautious about giving prescriptions to patients who misuse alcohol or drugs. A direct and especially new request for zopiclone should raise concern for potential abuse. Such abuse might include personal use or sale of the drug on the street. Physicians could try low-dose antidepressants, such as amitripty-line or trazodone, if a pharmacologic agent is absolutely required for insomnia.
Cognitive behavioural therapy is another alternative to or replacement for medication.55 In studies of the elderly, for example, meta-analysis has proposed that short-term treatment with hypnosedatives is more likely to cause adverse effects than to improve sleep.8 Other nonpharmacologic interventions are also likely to be successful.56 Managing insomnia should not consist solely of using prescription medication. Notes
Footnotes Competing interests None declared This article has been peer reviewed. References 1. Noble S, Langtry HD, Lamb HM. Zopiclone: an update of its pharmacology, clinical efficacy and tolerability in the treatment of insomnia. Drugs. 1998;55:277–302. [PubMed] 2. Kales A, Scharf MB, Kales JD, Soldatos CR. Rebound insomnia. A potential hazard following withdrawal of certain benzodiazepines. JAMA. 1979;241:1692–5. [PubMed] 3. Sanger DJ. The pharmacology and mechanisms of action of new generation, non-benzodiazepine hypnotic agents. CNS Drugs. 2004;18(Suppl 1):9–15. [PubMed] 4. Hesse LM, von Moltke LL, Greenblatt DJ. Clinically important drug interactions with zopiclone, zolpidem and zaleplon. CNS Drugs. 2003;17:513–32. [PubMed] 5. Repchinsky C, editor. Canadian Pharmacists Association. Compendium of pharmaceuticals and specialties: the Canadian drug reference for health professionals. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Pharmacists Association; 2006. 6. Chilcott LA, Shapiro CM. The socioeconomic impact of insomnia. An overview. Pharmacoeconomics. 1996;10(Suppl 1):1–14. [PubMed] 7. Busto UE, Sproule BA, Knight K, Herrmann N. Use of prescription and non-prescription hypnotics in a Canadian elderly population. Can J Clin Pharmacol. 2001;8:213–21. [PubMed] 8. Glass J, Lanctôt KL, Herrmann N, Sproule BA, Busto UE. Sedative hypnotics in older people with insomnia: meta-analysis of risks and benefits. BMJ. 2005;331:1169. [PubMed] 9. Rendle MA. Zopiclone (Imovane): evaluation in general practice. N Z Med J. 1990;103:225. [PubMed] 10. Kassam A, Carter B, Patten SB. Sedative hypnotic use in Alberta. Can J Psychiatry. 2006;51:287–94. [PubMed] 11. Kassam A, Patten SB. Canadian trends in benzodiazepine and zopiclone use. Can J Clin Pharmacol. 2006;13:e121–7. 12. Skinner BJ. Canada’s drug price paradox: the unexpected losses caused by government interference in pharmaceutical markets. Vancouver, BC: Fraser Institute Digital Publication; 2005. 13. Bianchi M, Musch B. Zopiclone discontinuation: review of 25 studies assessing withdrawal and rebound phenomena. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1990;5(Suppl 2):139–45. [PubMed] 14. Musch B, Maillard F. Zopiclone, the third generation hypnotic: a clinical overview. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1990;5(Suppl 2):147–58. [PubMed] 15. Hajak G. A comparative assessment of the risks and benefits of zopiclone: a review of 15 years’ clinical experience. Drug Saf. 1999;21:457–69. [PubMed] 16. Delahaye C, Ferrand B, Pieddeloup C, Musch B. Post marketing surveillance of zopiclone: interim analysis on the first 10,000 cases in a clinical study in general practice. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1990;5(Suppl 2):131–8. [PubMed] 17. Allain H, Delahaye C, Le Coz F, Blin P, Decombe R, Martinet JP. Postmarketing surveillance of zopiclone in insomnia: analysis of 20,513 cases. Sleep. 1991;14:408–13. [PubMed] 18. Lader M. Rebound insomnia and newer hypnotics. Psychopharmacology. 1992;108:248–55. [PubMed] 19. Lader M. Zopiclone: is there any dependence and abuse potential? J Neurol. 1997;244(4 Suppl 1):s18–22. [PubMed] 20. Soyka M, Bottlender R, Möller HJ. Epidemiological evidence for a low abuse potential of zolpidem. Pharmacopsychiatry. 2000;33:138–41. [PubMed] 21. Yanagita T. Dependence potential of zopiclone studied in monkeys. Pharmacology. 1983;27(Suppl 2):216–27. [PubMed] 22. Clee WB, McBride AJ, Sullivan G. Warning about zopiclone misuse. Addiction. 1996;91:1389–90. [PubMed] 23. Dündar Y, Dodd S, Strobl J, Boland A, Dickson R, Walley T. Comparative efficacy of newer hypnotic drugs for the short-term management of insomnia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2004;19:305–22. [PubMed] 24. Sutherland JC. Imovane and narcotic addiction. N Z Med J. 1991;104:103. [PubMed] 25. Aranko K, Henriksson M, Hublin C, Seppäläinen AM. Misuse of zopiclone and convulsions during withdrawal. Pharmacopsychiatry. 1991;24:138–40. [PubMed] 26. Thakore J, Dinan TG. Physical dependence following zopiclone usage: a case report. Hum Psychopharmacol. 1992;7:143–5. 27. Sullivan G, McBride AI, Clee WB. Zopiclone abuse in South Wales: three case reports. Hum Psychopharmacol. 1995;10:351–2. 28. Jones IR, Sullivan G. Physical dependence on zopiclone: case reports. BMJ. 1998;316:117. [PubMed] 29. Sikdar S. Physical dependence on zopiclone. Prescribing this drug to addicts may give rise to iatrogenic drug misuse. BMJ. 1998;317:146. [PubMed] 30. Ayonrinde O, Sampson E. Physical dependence on zopiclone. Risk of dependence may be greater in those with dependent personalities. BMJ. 1998;317:146. [PubMed] 31. Flynn A, Cox D. Dependence on zopiclone [letter]. Addiction. 2006;101:898. [PubMed] 32. Sikdar S, Ruben SM. Zopiclone abuse among polydrug users. Addiction. 1996;91:285–6. [PubMed] 33. Mamelak M, Scima A, Price V. Effects of zopiclone on the sleep of chronic insomniacs. Int Pharmacopsychiatry. 1982;17(Suppl 2):156–64. [PubMed] 34. Dorian P, Sellers EM, Kaplan H, Hamilton C. Evaluation of zopiclone physical dependence liability in normal volunteers. Pharmacology. 1983;27(Suppl 2):228–34. [PubMed] 35. Lader M, Denney SC. A double-blind study to establish the residual effects of zopiclone on performance in healthy volunteers. Pharmacology. 1983;27(Suppl 2):98–108. [PubMed] 36. Bechelli LP, Navas F, Pierangelo SA. Comparison of the reinforcing properties of zopiclone and triazolam in former alcoholics. Pharmacology. 1983;27(Suppl 2):235–41. [PubMed] 37. Boissl K, Dreyfus JF, Delmotte M. Studies on the dependence-inducing potential of zopiclone and triazolam. Pharmacology. 1983;27(Suppl 2):242–7. [PubMed] 38. Lader M, Frcka G. Subjective effects during administration and on discontinuation of zopiclone and temazepam in normal subjects. Pharmacopsychiatry. 1987;20:67–71. [PubMed] 39. Fleming JA, McClure DJ, Mayes C, Phillips R, Bourgouin J. A comparison of the efficacy, safety and withdrawal effects of zopiclone and triazolam in the treatment of insomnia. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1990;5(Suppl 2):29–37. [PubMed] 40. Ponciano E, Freitas F, Camara J, Faria M, Barreto M, Hindmarch I. A comparison of the efficacy, tolerance and residual effects of zopiclone, flurazepam and placebo in insomniac outpatients. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1990;5(Suppl 2):69–77. [PubMed] 41. Ngen CC, Hassan R. A double-blind placebo-controlled trial of zopiclone 7.5 mg and temazepam 20 mg in insomnia. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1990;5(Suppl 2):165–71. [PubMed] 42. Pecknold J, Wilson R, le Morvan P. Long term efficacy and withdrawal of zopiclone: a sleep laboratory study. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1990;5(Suppl 2):57–67. [PubMed] 43. Begg EJ, Robson RA, Frampton CM, Campbell JE. A comparison of efficacy and tolerance of the short acting sedatives midazolam and zopiclone. N Z Med J. 1992;105:428–9. [PubMed] 44. Lemoine P, Allain H, Janus C, Sutet P. Gradual withdrawal of zopiclone (7.5 mg) and zolpidem (10 mg) in insomniacs treated for at least 3 months. Eur Psychiatry. 1995;10(Suppl 3):161–5. 45. Mann K, Bauer H, Hiemke C, Röschke J, Wetzel H, Benkert O. Acute, sub-chronic and discontinuation effects of zopiclone on sleep EEG and nocturnal melatonin secretion. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 1996;6:163–8. [PubMed] 46. Stip E, Furlan M, Lussier I, Bourgouin P, Elie R. Double-blind, placebo-controlled study comparing effects of zopiclone and temazepam on cognitive functioning of insomniacs. Hum Psychopharmacol. 1999;14:253–61. 47. Voderholzer U, Riemann D, Hornyak M, Backhaus J, Feige B, Berger M, et al. A double-blind, randomized and placebo-controlled study on the polysomnographic withdrawal effects of zopiclone, zolpidem and triazolam in healthy subjects. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2001;251:117–23. [PubMed] 48. Tsutsui S. Zolipidem Study Group. A double-blind comparative study of zolpidem versus zopiclone in the treatment of chronic primary insomnia. J Int Med Res. 2001;29:163–77. [PubMed] 49. Johansson BA, Berglund M, Hanson M, Pöhlén C, Persson I. Dependence on legal psychotropic drugs among alcoholics. Alcohol Alcohol. 2003;38:613–8. [PubMed] 50. Jaffe JH, Bloor R, Crome I, Carr M, Alam F, Simmons A, et al. A postmarketing study of relative abuse liability of hypnotic sedative drugs. Addiction. 2004;99:165–73. [PubMed] 51. Mahomed R, Paton C, Lee E. Prescribing hypnotics in a mental health trust: what consultant psychiatrists say and what they do. Pharm J. 2002;268:657–9. 52. Hajak G, Müller WE, Wittchen HU, Pittrow D, Kirch W. Abuse and dependence potential for the non-benzodiazepine hypnotics zolpidem and zopiclone: a review of case reports and epidemiological data. Addiction. 2003;98:1371–8. [PubMed] 53. Medsafe Editorial Team. Dependence with zopiclone. Information for Health Professionals. Wellington, New Zealand: Medsafe. New Zealand Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Authority, Ministry of Health; 1998. [Accessed 2007 Oct 15]. Available from: www.medsafe.govt.nz/profs/PUarticles/3.htm. 54. Hajak G, Rodenbeck A. Clinical management of patients with insomnia. The role of zopiclone. Pharmacoeconomics. 1996;10(Suppl 1):29–38. [PubMed] 55. Sivertsen B, Omvik S, Pallesen S, Bjorvatn B, Havik OE, Kvale G, et al. Cognitive behavioral therapy vs zopiclone for treatment of chronic primary insomnia in older adults: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2006;295:2851–8. [PubMed] 56. Morin CM, Culbert JP, Schwartz SM. Nonpharmacological interventions for insomnia: a meta-analysis of treatment efficacy. Am J Psychiatry. 1994;151:1172–80. [PubMed] |
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||
Drugs. 1998 Feb; 55(2):277-302.
[Drugs. 1998]JAMA. 1979 Apr 20; 241(16):1692-5.
[JAMA. 1979]CNS Drugs. 2004; 18 Suppl 1():9-15; discussion 41, 43-5.
[CNS Drugs. 2004]CNS Drugs. 2003; 17(7):513-32.
[CNS Drugs. 2003]Pharmacoeconomics. 1996; 10 Suppl 1():1-14.
[Pharmacoeconomics. 1996]Can J Clin Pharmacol. 2001 Winter; 8(4):213-21.
[Can J Clin Pharmacol. 2001]BMJ. 2005 Nov 19; 331(7526):1169.
[BMJ. 2005]N Z Med J. 1990 May 9; 103(889):225.
[N Z Med J. 1990]Can J Psychiatry. 2006 Apr; 51(5):287-94.
[Can J Psychiatry. 2006]Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1990 Apr; 5 Suppl 2():139-45.
[Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1990]Drug Saf. 1999 Dec; 21(6):457-69.
[Drug Saf. 1999]Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1990 Apr; 5 Suppl 2():131-8.
[Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1990]Sleep. 1991 Oct; 14(5):408-13.
[Sleep. 1991]Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1992; 108(3):248-55.
[Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1992]N Z Med J. 1991 Mar 13; 104(907):103.
[N Z Med J. 1991]Addiction. 2006 Jun; 101(6):898.
[Addiction. 2006]N Z Med J. 1991 Mar 13; 104(907):103.
[N Z Med J. 1991]Addiction. 1996 Feb; 91(2):285-6.
[Addiction. 1996]Addiction. 1996 Feb; 91(2):285-6.
[Addiction. 1996]Addiction. 2004 Feb; 99(2):165-73.
[Addiction. 2004]Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1992; 108(3):248-55.
[Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1992]Addiction. 2003 Oct; 98(10):1371-8.
[Addiction. 2003]Pharmacoeconomics. 1996; 10 Suppl 1():29-38.
[Pharmacoeconomics. 1996]JAMA. 2006 Jun 28; 295(24):2851-8.
[JAMA. 2006]BMJ. 2005 Nov 19; 331(7526):1169.
[BMJ. 2005]Am J Psychiatry. 1994 Aug; 151(8):1172-80.
[Am J Psychiatry. 1994]Pharmacoeconomics. 1996; 10 Suppl 1():29-38.
[Pharmacoeconomics. 1996]