Logo of jbiocytThe Journal of Cell BiologyThis Article at jcb.orgEditorsContactThe Rockefeller University PressInstructions to Authors
J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1960 Jun 1; 7(3): 559–565.
PMCID: PMC2224832

Multinucleation of Skeletal Muscle in vitro


Healthy, mature, spontaneously contracting muscle was cultivated from explants of 13-day chick embryos for periods up to 4 months in the multipurpose chamber (Rose, 1954) using cellophane-strip technique (Rose et al., 1958) with silicone gaskets, Eagle's medium including 10 per cent horse serum reinforced with 300 mg-per cent of glucose, and the teased type of explant. This method provided optically ideal conditions for the study of muscle fibers with oil immersion, phase contrast time-lapse cinematography at 1 frame per minute without apparent damage for periods as long as 10 days. In no case was mitosis, amitosis, or nuclear "budding" observed in the course of muscle development. Multinuclear muscle fibers have been shown with cine technique to result from both myoblast fusion and polar extension of preformed (explanted) muscle tissue. Myoblast fusion was the only demonstrable way of giving rise to multinucleation. Nuclear membrane "wrinkling" was shown to be merely a temporary distortion that occurred during nuclear migration and rotation. It is suggested that this phenomenon may be responsible for numerous reports of amitosis in the genesis of muscle fibers. The histological development of new straps resulted from an orderly sequence of events. Included in these were polar extension, nuclear migration, rotation, and fixation. Following these events there was increased mitochondrial activity, myofibril formation, and cross-banding. Spontaneous contractions were seen throughout the entire course of differentiation in vitro but became more regular and stronger in the later stages.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.5M).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • GODMAN GC. The effect of colchicine on striated muscle in tissue culture. Exp Cell Res. 1955 Jun;8(3):488–499. [PubMed]
  • GODMAN GC, MURRAY MR. Influence of colchicine on the form of skeletal muscle in tissue culture. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1953 Dec;84(3):668–672. [PubMed]
  • HOLTZER H, MARSHALL JM, Jr, FINCK H. An analysis of myogenesis by the use of fluorescent antimyosin. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1957 Sep 25;3(5):705–724. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • LASH JW, HOLTZER H, SWIFT H. Regeneration of mature skeletal muscle. Anat Rec. 1957 Aug;128(4):679–697. [PubMed]
  • MOSCONA A. Development of heterotypic combinations of dissociated embryonic chick cells. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1956 Jun;92(2):410–416. [PubMed]
  • POMERAT CM. Cinematographic analysis of cell dynamics. Fed Proc. 1958 Dec;17(4):975–984. [PubMed]
  • ROSE G. A separable and multipurpose tissue culture chamber. Tex Rep Biol Med. 1954;12(4):1074–1083. [PubMed]
  • ROSE GG, POMERAT CM, SHINDLER TO, TRUNNELL JB. A cellophane-strip technique for culturing tissue in multipurpose culture chambers. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1958 Nov 25;4(6):761–764. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from The Journal of Biophysical and Biochemical Cytology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press


Save items

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...


  • PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...