• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
Neuron. Author manuscript; available in PMC Aug 16, 2008.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2215388
NIHMSID: NIHMS28956

RNA binding proteins hnRNP A2/B1 and CUGBP1 suppress Fragile X CGG premutation repeat-induced neurodegeneration in a Drosophila model of FXTAS

Abstract

Fragile X associated tremor ataxia syndrome (FXTAS) is a recently described neurodegenerative disorder of older adult carriers of premutation alleles (60-200 CGG repeats) in the fragile-X mental retardation gene (FMR1). It has been proposed that FXTAS is an RNA mediated neurodegenerative disease caused by the titration of RNA binding proteins by the CGG repeats. To test this hypothesis, we utilize a transgenic Drosophila model of FXTAS that expresses premutation length repeat (90 CGG repeats) from the 5’ UTR of the human FMR1 gene and displays neuronal degeneration. Here, we show that over-expression of RNA binding proteins, hnRNP A2/B1 and CUGBP1 suppress the phenotype of the CGG transgenic fly. Furthermore, we show that hnRNP A2/B1 directly interacts with riboCGG repeats and that the CUGBP1 protein interacts with the riboCGG repeats via hnRNP A2/B1.

Introduction

Fragile X Syndrome is the most common form of hereditary mental retardation, occurring in individuals lacking the fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP). Large expansions of the CGG trinucleotide repeat (>200 repeats) in the 5’ untranslated region of the FMR1 gene leads to silencing of its transcript and the loss of FMR1 product, FMRP (Warren, 2001). Most individuals in the general population carry fewer than 60 CGG repeats while those individuals with CGG repeat expansions between 60 and 200 are referred to as premutation carriers. These alleles support transcription of FMR1 and hence premutation carriers are phenotypically normal with respect to the features of Fragile X syndrome. However, fragile X associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS), a neurodegenerative disorder has recently been described in a subgroup of premutation adult carriers (Hagerman and Hagerman, 2004). FXTAS is characterized by tremor, gait problems, cerebellar dysfunction, cognitive decline and parkinsonism associated with generalized brain atrophy (Hagerman et al., 2001). Eosinophilic intranuclear inclusions in both neuronal and astroglial cells, Purkinje cell drop out and Purkinje axonal torpedos have been observed in postmortem examinations of the brains of premutation carrier males (Greco et al., 2002). The lack of association of features of Fragile X Syndrome with FXTAS (and vice versa) suggests an improbable relationship between the FMR1 protein and FXTAS. A distinguishing characteristic of premutation carriers is the production of FMR1 transcripts with extended CGG repeats, while patients with Fragile X Syndrome produce little or no FMR1 mRNA. Additionally, increased FMR1 mRNA levels have been observed in the premutation carriers and in a ‘knock-in’ CGG mouse model supporting the idea that FXTAS is an RNA-mediated neurodegenerative disorder (Tassone et al., 2000, Willemsen et al., 2003). A transgenic fly model expressing the 5’ UTR of the human FMR1 gene with 90 CGG repeats showed that the premutation length repeat out of the FMR1 mRNA context could cause neurodegeneration (Jin et al., 2003). Flies expressing these CGG repeats in the eye display disorganized ommatidia, de-pigmentation and progressive loss of photoreceptor neurons. As shown by temperature shift experiments these phenotypes are late onset and not a consequence of developmental abnormalities (Jin et al., 2003). The eye phenotype could be suppressed by over expressing hsp70, a chaperone involved in protein folding (Jin et al., 2003). These results suggest that transcription of the CGG90 repeats lead to an RNA-mediated neurodegenerative disease, possibly via influencing RNA binding proteins.

To test this model and to define modifiers of the rCGG repeats-mediated eye phenotype, we carried out a genetic screen making use of a collection of candidate RNA binding proteins. CUGBP1, an RNA binding protein discovered for its ability to bind CUG repeats and implicated in myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) (Timchenko et al., 1996, Timchenko et al., 2001, Timchenko et al., 2004) was identified in our screen as the sole modifier among the candidates. We show that over-expression of CUGBP1 is able to suppress the neurodegenerative eye phenotype of the CGG90 transgenic flies. Furthermore, we show that the CUGBP1 protein is able to interact with the CGG repeats via hnRNP A2/B1, a riboCGG binding protein. hnRNP A2/B1 is an RNA-binding protein that is present in intranuclear inclusions of FXTAS patients (Iwahashi et al., 2006). We demonstrate that hnRNP A2/B1 binds directly to the CGG repeats (accompanying manuscript, Jin et al. and in this paper), and that over-expression of hnRNP A2/B1 and its two Drosophila homologues suppress the rCGG repeat-mediated neurodegenerative eye phenotype.

Results

Over-expression of CUGBP1 suppresses the rCGG induced neurodegeneration

We carried out a genetic screen on the CGG90 neurodegenerative eye phenotype to identify potential RNA binding proteins that modify the rCGG-mediated toxicity. The screen involved directing the expression of premutation-length CGG repeats to the eye with the Gmr-GAL4 driver using the Drosophila GAL4/UAS system. This was followed by crossing Gmr-GAL4, UAS-(CGG)90-EGFP transgenic flies with flies mutant in genes coding for approximately 60 different candidate RNA binding proteins which were either created by our group or were available from the Bloomington stock center (Table 1). The progeny were examined for potential suppression or enhancement of the disorganized eye phenotype by comparison to control rCGG flies (Table 1). Through this screen, we identified one modifier of rCGG-mediated neurodegeneration, CUGBP1. Figure 1 shows that over-expression of human CUGBP1 suppresses the neurodegenerative phenotype of the CGG90 transgenic fly. Given the role of CUGBP1 in myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1), we also examined the other major protein implicated in DM1, Muscle blind-like protein 1 (MBNL1) (Kanadia et al., 2003; Ranum and Day, 2004). We did not observe a genetic interaction between MBNL1 and rCGG-mediated neurodegeneration (Table 1 and data not shown). This is unlikely to be due to inadequate levels of expression of MBNL1 since the same lines have been shown to modify the eye toxicity and muscle degeneration phenotypes in a fly model of myotonic dystrophy (de Haro et al., 2006).

Figure 1
CUGBP1 modulates rCGG-mediated neurodegenerative eye phenotype
Table thumbnail
Candidate RNA binding proteins screened to identify modifiers of the rCGG-mediated neurodegenerative eye phenotype

CUGBP1 interacts with rCGG repeats via hnRNP A2/B1

Similar to the DM1 model, it has been proposed that the lengthy rCGG repeats sequesters RNA binding proteins from their normal function(s) which leads to neuronal degeneration (Hagerman and Hagerman, 2002; Jin et al., 2003). Therefore to understand how CUGBP1 modulates rCGG-mediated toxicity, we tested whether CUGBP1 could bind rCGG repeats. We did not detect a direct interaction between CUGBP1 and rCGG repeats (data not shown), which is consistent with a previous report (Timchenko et al., 1996). Next, we reasoned that CUGBP1 might interact indirectly with rCGG repeats via rCGGBPs, thus we turned to interactions between CUGBP1 and rCGGBPs. hnRNPA2/B1 and Pur α are the two RNA binding proteins identified to bind rCGG repeats in a parallel biochemical screen (accompanying paper, Jin et al.). Therefore, we tested the interactions between Pur α or hnRNP A2/B1 with CUGBP1. We found that endogenous Pur α did not co-immunoprecipitate with CUGBP1 (data not shown). However, endogenous hnRNP A2/B1 co-immunoprecipitated with endogenous CUGBP1 from mouse brain lysates and this interaction is RNA independent (Figures 2A, B and C), which suggests a distinct complex is formed between CUGBP1 and hnRNP A2/B1 independent of Pur α. Also, we showed that CUGBP1 does not interact with other RNA binding proteins, hnRNP A3 and FMRP, which suggests a specific interaction of CUGBP1 with hnRNP A2/B1 (Figure 2A). To confirm that the interaction between CUGBP1 and hnRNP A2/B1 is relevant to FXTAS pathogenesis, we investigated whether a complex is formed between all three components, CUGBP1, hnRNP A2/B1 and the rCGG repeats. Using in vitro translated protein, we found that CUGBP1 bound to rCGG repeats in the presence of hnRNP A2/B1 (Figure 2D). These observations suggest that the modulation of rCGG-mediated eye phenotype by CUGBP1 is through hnRNP A2/B1. To further investigate whether this physical interaction is relevant in vivo, we tested for possible genetic interactions between CUGBP1 and hnRNP A2/B1. We found that co-expression of Drosophila homologues of hnRNP A2/B1 proteins suppress the rough-eye phenotype caused by a high expression of CUGBP1 (Figure 3). This suggests that these proteins might antagonize each other's biological function/s although this relationship may or may not be relevant to FXTAS pathogenesis.

Figure 2
CUGBP1 interacts with rCGG repeats through hnRNP A2/B1
Figure 3
Over-expression of Drosophila hnRNP A2/B1 homologues suppress the CUGBP1 rough eye phenotype

hnRNP A2/B1 interacts with the rCGG repeats

We confirmed the interaction between rCGG repeats and hnRNP A2/B1 by performing gel-shift assays using the antibody against hnRNP A2/B1 in mouse cerebellar lysates, the brain region most affected in FXTAS (Greco et al., 2006). The addition of antibody against hnRNP A2/B1 leads to a supershift, indicating that hnRNP A2/B1 is present in the rCGG-protein complex (Figure 4A). We also carried out binding reactions of both cytoplasmic and nuclear mouse cerebellar lysates, with the CGG105 as well as with a normal length CGG30 biotinylated RNA. The captured proteins were analyzed using antibody against hnRNP A2/B1. We found that both normal (30 repeats) and premutation (105 repeats) length rCGG repeats could bind to hnRNP A2/B1. However, this interaction is most evident in the cytoplasmic mouse cerebellar lysates, despite the finding that hnRNP A2/B1 is present in both the cytoplasm and nuclei (Figure 4B). Nuclear hnRNPA2/B1 shows little or no interaction with rCGG repeats suggesting that some modification(s) of the protein in either the nucleus or cytoplasm alters its ability to bind the rCGG repeats.

Figure 4
Interaction between rCGG repeats and hnRNP A2/B1 modulates rCGG-mediated neurodegeneration

To test that hnRNP A2/B1 directly interacts with rCGG repeats, we isolated the full-length cDNA encoding human hnRNP A2/B1 (A2 form) for in vitro translation. This protein was incubated with identical molar quantities of biotinylated normal (30 repeats) or premutation (105 repeats) length rCGG repeats. We demonstrated that hnRNP A2/B1 directly interacts with the rCGG repeats, and that increased binding of the protein to the premutation length rCGG repeats is observed. (Figure 4C). Also, we note that transgenic flies expressing normal length rCGG repeats do not have a rough eye phenotype (supplemental figure 1).

Over-expression of human and two Drosophila homologues of hnRNP A2/B1 suppress the rCGG-mediated phenotype

To further explore the functional significance of the association between hnRNP A2/B1 and rCGG repeats, we generated transgenic lines expressing members of the hnRNP A2/B1 family of proteins. Drosophila genes Hrb87Fand Hrb98DE encode the fly proteins HRB87F and HRB98DE (also known as hrp36 and hrp38, respectively) (Zu et al., 1996), which are the closest Drosophila homologues for mammalian hnRNP A2/B1 protein (55% identity). We generated UAS lines that over-express human hnRNP A2/B1, Hrb87F or Hrb98DE in the presence of a GAL4 driver, and crossed those lines with transgenic flies expressing 90 CGG repeat. We found that over-expression of either human hnRNP A2/B1, Hrb87For Hrb98DE suppresses the rCGG-mediated eye toxicity (Figure 4D). This result suggests that hnRNP A2/B1 is also involved in rCGG-mediated neurodegeneration. Furthermore, it supports the model that titration of these proteins by the rCGG repeats prevents them from carrying out their functions since over-expression of these proteins suppress the neurodegenerative phenotype of flies expressing rCGG repeats. Additionally, flies that are homozygous null for Hrb87F present with a mild rough eye phenotype and loss of photoreceptor neurons (Sengupta and Lakhotia, 2006) which is in agreement with the titration model.

Discussion

Fragile X-Associated Tremor/Ataxia Syndrome (FXTAS) is a neurodegenerative disorder recognized in some fragile X syndrome premutation carriers with FMR1 alleles containing 55–200 CGG repeats (Hagerman et al., 2004). Previous studies have demonstrated that FXTAS is RNA-mediated, caused by expanded fragile X premutation rCGG repeats (Arocena et al., 2005; Jin et al., 2003; Willemsen et al., 2003). Our studies have tested the hypothesis that RNA binding proteins are involved in FXTAS pathogenesis, and we report that CUGBP1 and hnRNPA2/B1 are two such RNA binding proteins.

HnRNP A2/B1 and CUGBP1 in FXTAS

HnRNP A2/B1 was identified to bind rCGG repeats in a parallel biochemical screen (accompanying paper, Jin et al.). We confirmed this interaction between rCGG repeats and hnRNP A2/B1 in our studies. We found that both normal (30 repeats) and premutation (105 repeats) length rCGG repeats could bind to hnRNP A2/B1. However, nuclear hnRNPA2/B1 shows little or no interaction with rCGG repeats suggesting that some modification(s) of the protein in either the nucleus or cytoplasm alters its ability to bind the rCGG repeats. Indeed, the protein kinase, Casein kinase 2 is able to phosphorylate hnRNP A2/B1 in vivo (Pancetti et al., 1999). The differential binding abilities of hnRNPA2/B1 to rCGG repeats depending upon the protein's cellular location suggests that cytoplasmic hnRNP A2/B1 has an independent or distinct role from its function in the nucleus. An alternative possibility to explain the differential binding of hnRNP A2/B1 is that other proteins compete with it for rCGG binding in the nuclear fraction. Iwahashi et al., 2006 identified more than twenty of such proteins in the nuclear inclusions of FXTAS patients.

Also, we identified CUGBP1 has a modifier of the rCGG mediated eye phenotype through our candidate based genetic screen. We show that CUGBP1 is able to interact with the rCGG repeats in the presence of hnRNP A2/B1. Furthermore, we show that over-expression of either CUGBP1 or hnRNPA2/B1 suppresses the eye phenotype caused by the expression of fragile X premutation rCGG repeats. These data support the model that titration of these proteins by the rCGG repeats prevents them from carrying out their functions since over-expression of these proteins suppress the neurodegenerative phenotype of flies expressing rCGG repeats.

The roles of hnRNP A2/B1 and CUGBP1 in the pathogenesis of FXTAS are intriguing. In DM1, total CUGBP1 steady-state levels are increased, with increased nuclear CUGBP1 and decreased CUGBP1 in the cytoplasm (Ranum and Cooper, 2006). In our study, we found that increased levels of CUGBP1 suppress the neurodegenerative phenotype caused by the rCGG repeats. This is an interesting and surprising observation as increased levels of CUGBP1 are implicated in DM1. However, the findings that cytoplasmic hnRNP A2/B1 interacts strongly with rCGG, and that CUGBP1 is able to interact with rCGG repeats via hnRNP A2/B1 suggest that principally cytoplasmic functions are compromised. This is consistent with the reduction of cytoplasmic CUGBP1 found in DM1.

MBNL1, the other major protein implicated in myotonic dystrophy, was found in the nuclear inclusions of FXTAS patients (Iwahashi et al., 2006). However we did not detect a modification on the rCGG repeat eye phenotype by modulating MBNL1 levels. This result raises the issue of the functional significance of a protein that is found in inclusions. The observation of widespread nuclear ubiquitin and hsp70 positive inclusions in affected tissues of FXTAS (Greco et al., 2002) suggested that these play a direct role in pathology, possibly by sequestering factors in a manner to that proposed in DM1. The presence of FMR1 mRNA in inclusions (Tassone et al., 2004) argues that rCGG repeats may nucleate inclusions that contain rCGGBPs. However, it is unlikely that the majority of FMR1 mRNA is confined to inclusions, and the soluble RNA may also interact aberrantly with RNA binding proteins. Thus, presence of a protein in inclusions may not be an indicator of a direct role in pathogenesis.

In summary, through both biochemical and genetic assays, we implicate the RNA binding proteins CUGBP1, hnRNP A2/B1 and Pur α (Pur α results are described in the accompanying manuscript by Jin et al.) in the pathogenesis of FXTAS. Our data support the model of FXTAS pathogenesis whereby these RNA binding proteins are titrated from their biological functions. These results could also explain the incomplete penetrance of FXTAS as polymorphisms in expression levels of these proteins could offer a protective effect to a fraction of premutation carriers. More importantly, the existing data suggest two distinct ways by which the CGG repeat exerts its toxicity. In the nuclear inclusions rCGG repeats sequester RNA binding proteins such as hnRNP A2/B1 (observed in FXTAS patients). However, our observations show that the interaction between hnRNP A2/B1 and the rCGG repeats is most evident in the cytoplasm. The data suggest another mechanism such that FMR1 mRNA not confined to nucleus may also interact aberrantly with RNA binding proteins.

Experimental Procedures

RNA-binding assays and Protein Identification

To prepare brain lysates, mouse brains were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and homogenized in lysis buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM KCl, 0.5 mM DTT). The samples were then centrifuged for 5 min at 10,000 rpm to pellet nuclei and the supernatant (cytoplasmic fraction) was collected and used for RNA-binding assays. Radioactive-, biotin-, or fluorescent-labeled CGG repeat RNAs were synthesized using the RNAMaxx High Yield Transcription Kit (Stratagene). The RNA probe (100ng) was incubated with 20 μg brain lysates or with 50 ng in vitro-translated protein(s) at room temperature for 30 minutes in 1X binding buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 100 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 5 mM DTT and 10% glycerol). The binding reaction was loaded and separated on native polyacrylamide gel, which was analyzed via Storm 840 phosphorimager (Amersham Biosciences Corp). For the binding reaction with biotinylated RNAs, DynaBeads M-280 Streptavidin (Dynal, Invitrogen) were used to capture the rCGG-protein complex. The beads were washed before use and resuspended in binding buffer. The captured proteins were subjected to Western blots with anti-hnRNP A2/B1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and anti-CUGBP1 (Upstate) antibodies.

Immunoprecipitation

Mouse brains were collected and homogenized in 1 ml ice-cold lysis buffer (10 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 30 mM EDTA, 0.5% Triton X-100) with 2X complete protease inhibitors. All further manipulations of the brain lysates were performed at 4°C or on ice. Nuclei and debris were pelleted at 10,000 X g for 10 minutes; the supernatant was collected, and pre-cleared for 1 hr with 100ul recombinant protein G agarose (Invitrogen). Anti-CUGBP1 antibody (Upstate) or Anti-hnRNP A2/B1 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) was incubated with recombinant protein G agarose at 4°C for 2hr and washed three times with lysis buffer. The precleared lysates were immunoprecipitated with antibody coated recombinant protein G agarose at 4°C overnight. The precipitated complexes were used for western blot. Anti-hnRNP A2/B1 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), Anti-hnRNP A3 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), Anti-CUGBP1 (Upstate) antibody or Anti-FMRP (kind gift from J.L Mandel) was used for western blot. For RNase treatment, the pre-cleared lysate was incubated with RNase A (1 mg/ml) at 37 degree for 15 min. Each sample was subjected to additional centrifugation at 10,000 X g before immunoprecipitation.

Drosophila Genetics

The pUAST constructs were generated by cloning full-length cDNAs, including 2 lines each of Drosophila Hrb87F, Hrb98DE and human hnRNP A2/B1 into the pUAST transformation vectors. The constructs were confirmed by DNA sequencing and then injected in a w1118 strain by standard methods. All the other UAS lines, insertions and GAL4 lines used in this study were obtained from the Bloomington Drosophila stock center or generated in the lab. Fly lines were grown on standard medium with yeast paste added. Genetic screen was carried out at 22°C, all other crosses were performed at 25°C unless indicated in text.

Microscopy

For scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images, whole flies were dehydrated in ethanol, dried with hexamethyldisilazane (Sigma), and analysed with an ISI DS-130 LaB6 SEM/STEM microscope.

Supplementary Material

01

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Jeannette Taylor and Dr. Robert Apkarian from The Integrated Microscopy and Microanalytical Facility and Dr. Jim Barrish, for help with SEM. The authors also would like to thank the members of Jin, Nelson and Botas lab for assistance. P.J. is supported by NIH grants R01 NS051630 and R01 MH076090. P.J. is the recipient of Beckman Young Investigator Award, Basil O'Connor Scholar Research Award and Alfred P. Sloan Research Fellow in Neuroscience. D.L.N. is supported by NIH grant RO1 HD038038, the BCM Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Center P50 HD024064, and the BCM-Emory Fragile X Research Center. J.B is supported by NIH grant NS42179.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • Arocena DG, Iwahashi CK, Won N, Beilina A, Ludwig AL, Tassone F, Schwartz PH, Hagerman PJ. Induction of inclusion formation and disruption of lamin A/C structure by premutation CGG-repeat RNA in human cultured neural cells. Hum Mol Genet. 2005;14:3661–3671. [PubMed]
  • de Haro M, Al-Ramahi I, De Gouyon B, Ukani L, Rosa A, Faustino NA, Ashizawa T, Cooper TA, Botas J. MBNL1 and CUGBP1 modify expanded CUG-induced toxicity in a Drosophila model of myotonic dystrophy type 1. Hum Mol Genet. 2006;15:2138–2145. [PubMed]
  • Greco CM, Hagerman RJ, Tassone F, Chudley AE, Del Bigio MR, Jacquemont S, Leehey M, Hagerman PJ. Neuronal intranuclear inclusions in a new cerebellar tremor/ataxia syndrome among fragile X carriers. Brain. 2002;125:1760–1771. [PubMed]
  • Greco CM, Berman RF, Martin RM, Tassone F, Schwartz PH, Chang A, Trapp BD, Iwahashi C, Brunberg J, Grigsby J, et al. Neuropathology of fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS) Brain. 2006;129:243–255. [PubMed]
  • Hagerman RJ, Leehey M, Heinrichs W, Tassone F, Wilson R, Hills J, Grigsby J, Gage B, Hagerman PJ. Intention tremor, parkinsonism, and generalized brain atrophy in male carriers of fragile X. Neurology. 2001;57:127–129. [PubMed]
  • Hagerman RJ, Hagerman PJ. The fragile X premutation: into the phenotypic fold. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2002;12:278–283. [PubMed]
  • Hagerman PJ, Hagerman RJ. The fragile-X premutation: a maturing perspective. Am J Hum Genet. 2004;74:805–816. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Iwahashi CK, Yasui DH, An HJ, Greco CM, Tassone F, Nannen K, Babineau B, Lebrilla CB, Hagerman RJ, Hagerman PJ. Protein composition of the intranuclear inclusions of FXTAS. Brain. 2006;129:256–271. [PubMed]
  • Jin P, Zarnescu DC, Zhang F, Pearson CE, Lucchesi JC, Moses K, Warren ST. RNA-mediated neurodegeneration caused by the fragile X premutation rCGG repeats in Drosophila. Neuron. 2003;39:739–747. [PubMed]
  • Jin P, Duan R, Qin Y, Rosser TC, Liu H, Warren ST. Pur α binds to rCGG repeats and modulates repeat-mediated neurodegeneration in a Drosophila model of Fragile X Tremor/ Ataxia Syndrome. Neuron. 2007 current issue. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Kanadia RN, Johnstone KA, Mankodi A, Lungu C, Thornton CA, Esson D, Timmers AM, Hauswirth WW, Swanson MS. A muscleblind knockout model for myotonic dystrophy. Science. 2003;302:1978–1980. [PubMed]
  • Pancetti F, Bosser R, Krehan A, Pyerin W, Itarte E, Bachs O. Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A2 interacts with protein kinase CK2. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1999;260:17–22. [PubMed]
  • Ranum LP, Cooper TA. RNA-Mediated Neuromuscular Disorders. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2006;29:259–277. [PubMed]
  • Ranum LP, Day JW. Myotonic dystrophy: RNA pathogenesis comes into focus. Am J Hum Genet. 2004;74:793–804. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Sengupta S, Lakhotia SC. Altered Expressions of the Noncoding hsromega Gene Enhances poly-Q-Induced Neurotoxicity in Drosophila. RNA Biol. 2006;3 [PubMed]
  • Takahashi N, Sasagawa N, Suzuki K, Ishiura S. The CUG-binding protein binds specifically to UG dinucleotide repeats in a yeast three-hybrid system. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000;277:518–523. [PubMed]
  • Tassone F, Hagerman RJ, Taylor AK, Gane LW, Godfrey TE, Hagerman PJ. Elevated levels of FMR1 mRNA in carrier males: a new mechanism of involvement in the fragile-X syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 2000;66:6–15. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Tassone F, Iwahashi C, Hagerman PJ. FMR1 RNA within the intranuclear inclusions of fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS) RNA Biol. 2004;1:103–105. [PubMed]
  • Timchenko LT, Miller JW, Timchenko NA, DeVore DR, Datar KV, Lin L, Roberts R, Caskey CT, Swanson MS. Identification of a (CUG)n triplet repeat RNA-binding protein and its expression in myotonic dystrophy. Nucleic Acids Res. 1996;24:4407–4414. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Timchenko NA, Cai ZJ, Welm AL, Reddy S, Ashizawa T, Timchenko LT. RNA CUG repeats sequester CUGBP1 and alter protein levels and activity of CUGBP1. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:7820–7826. [PubMed]
  • Timchenko NA, Patel R, Iakova P, Cai ZJ, Quan L, Timchenko LT. Overexpression of CUG triplet repeat-binding protein, CUGBP1, in mice inhibits myogenesis. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:13129–13139. [PubMed]
  • Warren ST, Sherman SL. The fragile X syndrome. In: Scriver CR, Beaudet AL, Valle D, Childs B, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, editors. The Metabolic & Molecular Bases of Inherited Disease. McGraw-Hill Companies; 2001. pp. 1257–1290.
  • Willemsen R, Hoogeveen-Westerveld M, Reis S, Holstege J, Severijnen LA, Nieuwenhuizen IM, Schrier M, van Unen L, Tassone F, Hoogeveen AT, et al. The FMR1 CGG repeat mouse displays ubiquitin-positive intranuclear neuronal inclusions; implications for the cerebellar tremor/ataxia syndrome. Hum Mol Genet. 2003;12:949–959. [PubMed]
  • Zu K, Sikes ML, Haynes SR, Beyer AL. Altered levels of the Drosophila HRB87F/hrp36 hnRNP protein have limited effects on alternative splicing in vivo. Mol Biol Cell. 1996;7:1059–1073. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
PubReader format: click here to try

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links