• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of plosonePLoS OneView this ArticleSubmit to PLoSGet E-mail AlertsContact UsPublic Library of Science (PLoS)
PLoS ONE. 2008; 3(1): e1488.
Published online Jan 23, 2008. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0001488
PMCID: PMC2198948

Group II Introns Break New Boundaries: Presence in a Bilaterian's Genome

Jason Stajich, Academic Editor

Abstract

Group II introns are ribozymes, removing themselves from their primary transcripts, as well as mobile genetic elements, transposing via an RNA intermediate, and are thought to be the ancestors of spliceosomal introns. Although common in bacteria and most eukaryotic organelles, they have never been reported in any bilaterian animal genome, organellar or nuclear. Here we report the first group II intron found in the mitochondrial genome of a bilaterian worm. This location is especially surprising, since animal mitochondrial genomes are generally distinct from those of plants, fungi, and protists by being small and compact, and so are viewed as being highly streamlined, perhaps as a result of strong selective pressures for fast replication while establishing germ plasm during early development. This intron is found in the mtDNA of an annelid worm, (an undescribed species of Nephtys), where the complete sequence revealed a 1819 bp group II intron inside the cox1 gene. We infer that this intron is the result of a recent horizontal gene transfer event from a viral or bacterial vector into the mitochondrial genome of Nephtys sp. Our findings hold implications for understanding mechanisms, constraints, and selective pressures that account for patterns of animal mitochondrial genome evolution

Introduction

Ribozymes are RNA molecules with enzymatic activities [1]. One type is called a self-splicing intron because these are removed from the gene's transcript without the formation of the spliceosomal protein complex (although some may require other proteins for efficient splicing in vivo) [2]. These are separated into group I and II types depending on the mechanism of splicing [1], [3], [4]. Although each type folds into a characteristic structure that is necessary for catalysis, there is almost no widely conserved nucleotide sequence even within each type [1], [2], [3]. These introns are also mobile genetic elements, capable of movement into other genes and, in many cases, they contain one or more genes that encode for proteins (e.g. reverse transcriptase) that enable this mobility [4], [5]. Both types of introns have a wide phylogenetic distribution (Table 1), being found in bacteria and the organelles of plants, fungi, protists and animals [3], [6], [7], [8]. Interestingly, group II introns, although completely absent in nuclear eukaryotic genomes, are believed to be the ancestors of spliceosomal introns and therefore have played a central role in eukaryotic genome evolution [9]. In contrast, group I introns are found in phage, viruses and nuclear genomes of fungi and protists [3], [10], [11], [12], [13].

Table 1
Key characteristics of group I and group II self-splicing introns.

The very rare presence of introns in animal mtDNAs challenges current views on organelle evolution. With more than 900 complete animal mtDNA sequences available, only some members of the basal groups, sponges and cnidarians (which have group I introns) and the placozoan Trichoplax adhaerens (which has multiple introns, including one of group II), have been found to possess introns, and all appear to have been acquired secondarily [7], [10], [12]. Although mitochondrial genomes of protists, fungi, and plants display wide variation in size, structure, and gene content, undergo high rates of recombination, and often contain large amounts of non-coding sequence and both types of self-splicing introns [14], [15], [16], those of animals have become practically evolutionarily static, with almost all being small, compact, circular molecules with the same 37 genes and lacking introns, all but small tracts of non-coding sequence, and all or nearly all recombination [17]. Understanding the forces responsible for these restricted set of changes in animal mtDNAs, in contrast to those of fungi and plants, has been the subject of much study and debate among evolutionary biologists [18].

Results

We have determined the complete sequence of the mitochondrial genome of Nephtys sp., a carnivorous polychaete inhabiting the intertidal and subtidal zones. This genome is typical of animal mtDNAs in possessing 37 genes on a single circular molecule with few and short non-coding regions [17]. However, contrary to all expectations, the protein coding gene cox1 contains a group II intron (Fig. 1). We confirmed that the intron is a part of the mtDNA rather than a nuclear pseudogene by using polymerase chain reactions (PCR) to amplify the entire mtDNA in two overlapping pieces using inverted primers that anneal within the intron (Table 2). We verified that this intron is, in fact, removed from the mRNA by cloning and sequencing cDNA made from the transcripts of the cox1 gene. We identified it as a group II self-splicing intron by a detailed examination of its sequence and potential secondary structure that revealed these diagnostic features: (1) conserved GUGYG and AY nucleotides at the 5′ and 3′ intron boundaries, respectively; (2) conserved sequence of domain V, which is the catalytic core of the intron's ribozymic activity; (3) presence of an ORF for a contiguous reverse transcriptase (RT) gene and a partial maturase gene; (4) potential secondary structure with six helical domains radiating from a central core consistent with the highly conserved secondary structure of group II introns (Fig. 1) [2], [6], [19], [20]. This is the first case of any intron found in the mtDNA of any bilaterian animal (Table 1).

Figure 1
Predicted secondary structure of the Nephtys sp. group II intron.
Table 2
Primers used for completion of Nephtys' mtDNA amplification.

Attempting to identify the evolutionary origin of the intron, we incorporated the inferred amino acid sequence of the intron's ORF (RT and partial maturase) into the alignment of Zimmerly et al. [19], which contains ORFs from other group II introns from bacterial and organellar genomes (both mitochondrial and chloroplast) from plants, fungi and protists (Table 3). In addition we have included the three most similar sequences in a search (using BLAST) of GenBank to the intron's ORF of Nephtys and of Trichoplax adhaerens in the alignment. A maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis suggests that Nephtys's ORF is sister to the cox1 ORF718 of the marine centric diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana among those RT sequences available for comparison (Fig. 2). However, broader taxon sampling of group II introns is needed to reliably infer their evolutionary history.

Figure 2
Phylogenetic analysis of 71 group II intron ORFs. A maximum likelihood analysis of the amino acid sequence for 71 ORFs suggests the cox1 ORF718 of the marine centric diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana as sister to the Nephtys's ORF.
Table 3
Mitochondrial, chloroplast and bacterial group II introns included in the phylogenetic analysis (modified from Zimmerly et al. ).

Discussion

The amino acid sequences of the intronic ORFs of Nephtys sp. and T. adhaerens (the only other animal shown to have a group II intron) have only 29% identity, indicating that these introns diverged long ago, presumably long-predating the divergence of these animal groups. Although both the T. adhaerens and Nephtys ORFs are found in the cox1 mitochondrial gene, their positions differ by 108 nucleotides. For these reasons it seems very likely that this intron has integrated into these two mtDNAs in separate events, particularly because the alternative would require the hypothesis of many parallel losses in related lineages.

Thus, this group II intron is most likely the result of recent horizontal gene transfer, presumably from a bacterial or a viral intermediary. This would require that the transferred genetic material was specifically sequestered by the germline in order to be inherited. Interestingly, some bacterial lineages (i.e. Wolbachia) invade the female reproductive tissues of their host (i.e. Drosophila) and live intracellularly inside of the eggs, leading to inheritance of the microbial population in subsequent generations [21]. Furthermore, horizontal gene transfer from these endosymbionts to the host has been documented [22]. In the case of annelids with high regenerative abilities such as Nephtys [23], [24], it is also conceivable that the initial horizontal transfer event occurred in tissue that later re-differentiated during regeneration. Because these introns are highly mobile and move throughout populations by both horizontal transfer and vertical inheritance [2], [16], [25], the mitochondrial host could have acquired the intron from a bacterial endosymbiont. However, whether Nephtys sp. harbors endosymbionts is yet unknown.

It may be that this intron is present only because it was recently acquired and insufficient time has passed for it to be lost. Nonetheless, it is tempting to speculate on whether there are properties of this mitochondrial genome that differ from those of most animals that have allowed it to escape from the presumed selection for small size to ensure rapid replication. Lynch and colleagues [18], [26] have advanced a theory to explain the opposite trends in the evolution of plant and animal mtDNAs that links rate of nucleotide substitution (much lower for plants) with the propensity to accumulate non-coding DNA (much higher in plants). Supporting this hypothesis, it has already been noted that, in contrast to most animals, cnidarians have a very slow rate of mitochondrial sequence change that may account for their adoption of introns [27], [28]. However, this does not appear to be consistent in the case of Nephtys sp., since a maximum likelihood analysis including all annelids for which the complete mtDNA sequence is available shows no great differences in branch lengths among them, even though only Nephtys sp. has acquired an intron (Fig. 3).

Figure 3
Maximum likelihood analysis of the protein coding genes.

Further study of mtDNAs of annelids, as well as the other groups that have acquired introns (i.e. sponges, cnidarians and placozoans) may illuminate the extent and patterns of intron gain as well as provide further genome-level data for better understanding the forces shaping mitochondrial genome evolution.

Materials and Methods

Nucleic acid extraction and sequencing

Total genomic DNA was extracted from frozen tissue using a Qiagen DNeasy kit according to supplier's instructions. The mtDNA was amplified by long PCR (using the Takara polymerase kit) in three overlapping pieces (~8 kb each) using specific and universal primers (Table 2) [29]. Each amplification product was ethanol-precipitated with NaSO4, dried, and resuspended in 100 µl of water. This was sheared into ~1.5 kb fragments using a Hydroshear device (GeneMachines), then the fragment ends were repaired using Klenow fragment and T4 polymerase. The product was size-selected using an agarose gel and ligated into pUC18 vector. These clones were introduced into E. coli cells by electroporation. This was plated and grown overnight at 37°. Colonies were picked and processed to generate reads from each end of randomly selected clones.

Total RNA was extracted from tissues samples using Quiazol reagent (Quiagen) according to the manufacturers instructions. cDNA was constructed from total RNA using the Superscript III First-Strand Synthesis System for RT-PCR (Invitrogen) following the manufacturers instructions. In order to verify that the presumed intron was removed from the transcript, a portion of the cox1 mRNA was amplified by PCR using primers matching the mtDNA sequence, and this product was isolated, cloned, and sequenced as above.

Sequence annotation, alignment and phylogenetic analyses

Phred and Phrap were used to call bases and produce an alignment (~10×) and Consed was used for manual verification of quality [30], [31], [32]. The mtDNA was annotated using DOGMA [33] and MacVector (Accelrys). The intron secondary structure was folded initially with Mfold [34] followed by hand editing.

In order to evaluate the evolutionary history of the introns themselves, the intronic ORFs within Nephtys sp. (Accession number EU293739), Trichoplax adhaerens [NC_008151], Thalassiosira pseudonana (ORF718) [YP_316587.1], Schizosaccharomyces octosporus (ORF786) [NP_700371.1] and Chlorokybus atmophyticus (ORF845) [NC_009630.1] were incorporated within the Zimmerly et al. [19] alignment using DIALIGN [35] (alignment accession number ALIGN_001217). Gblocks was used to determine the amino acid positions included in the phylogenetic analyses [36]. We performed a maximum likelihood (ML) analysis following the JTT model for amino acid substitution and executed bootstrap resampling to evaluate branch support in RAxML [37]. Percentage identity between Nephtys's ORF and T. adhaerens was calculated using the amino acid sequence included in the analysis with the program WU-blastp (http://www.proweb.org/proweb/Tools/WU-blast.html).

In order to evaluate the rates of change for Nephtys sp. and related mtDNAs, the protein coding genes of six annelids (Lumbricus terrestris, Nephtys sp., Clymenella torquata, Platynereis dumerilii, Orbinia latreillii, and Urechis caupo) and two mollusks (Nautilus macromphalus and Katharina tunicata) were aligned with CLUSTAL X [38]. Gblocks [36] was used to determine the positions included in the analyses. Modeltest determined the ML model (TVM+G) that best fit the data. We built the tree (Fig. 3) using the settings given by Modeltest [39] (Lset: Base = (0.3156 0.2146 0.1402) Nst = 6 Rmat = (1.1922 12.4843 2.0012 5.9256 12.4843) Rates = gamma Shape = 0.2388 Pinvar = 0) and 1000 bootstrap replicates in PAUP [40].

Acknowledgments

We thank R. Baker, P. Francino, T. Hausmann, J. Kuehl, C. Moritz, D. Simon, M. Stoeck, H. Vallès and D. Weisblat for valuable comments and P. Dehal for help with the analysis. The organism was collected with help from Friday Harbor Marine Labs of the University of Washington. L. Harris of the Los Angeles County Museum was most helpful with organismal identification (undescribed species, Nephtys sp. 3 Harris); this is now accession LACM-AHF POLY 2180 at that institution.

Footnotes

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Funding: This study was supported by a grant from the U.S. National Science Foundation EAR-0120646 (to KMH and JLB). Part of this work was performed under the auspices of the U. S. Department of Energy's Office of Science, Biological and Environmental Research Program, and by the University of California, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231.The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

1. Lehmann K, Schmidt U. Group II introns: structure and catalytic versatility of large natural ribozymes. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2003;38:249–303. [PubMed]
2. Lambowitz AM, Zimmerly S. Mobile group II introns. Annu Rev Genet. 2004;38:1–35. [PubMed]
3. Haugen P, Simon DM, Bhattacharya D. The natural history of group I introns. Trends Genet. 2005;21:111–119. [PubMed]
4. Robart AR, Zimmerly S. Group II intron retroelements: function and diversity. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2005;110:589–597. [PubMed]
5. Belfort M, Derbyshire V, Parker MM, Cousineau B, Lambowitz AM. Mobile introns: pathways and proteins. In: Graig NL, editor. Mobile DNA II. Washington, D.C.: ASM, Press; 2002.
6. Bonen L, Vogel J. The ins and outs of group II introns. Trends Genet. 2001;17:322–331. [PubMed]
7. Dellaporta SL, Xu A, Sagasser S, Jakob W, Moreno MA, et al. Mitochondrial genome of Trichoplax adhaerens supports placozoa as the basal lower metazoan phylum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:8751–8756. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. Foley S, Bruttin A, Brussow H. Widespread distribution of a group I intron and its three deletion derivatives in the lysin gene of Streptococcus thermophilus bacteriophages. J Virol. 2000;74:611–618. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Palmer JD, Logsdon JM., Jr The recent origins of introns. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1991;1:470–477. [PubMed]
10. Beagley CT, Okimoto R, Wolstenholme DR. The mitochondrial genome of the sea anemone Metridium senile (Cnidaria): introns, a paucity of tRNA genes, and a near-standard genetic code. Genetics. 1998;148:1091–1108. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Medina M, Collins AG, Takaoka TL, Kuehl JV, Boore JL. Naked corals: skeleton loss in Scleractinia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:9096–9100. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Rot C, Goldfarb I, Ilan M, Huchon D. Putative cross-kingdom horizontal gene transfer in sponge (Porifera) mitochondria. BMC Evol Biol. 2006;6:71. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Yamada T, Tamura K, Aimi T, Songsri P. Self-splicing group I introns in eukaryotic viruses. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994;22:2532–2537. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Andre C, Levy A, Walbot V. Small repeated sequences and the structure of plant mitochondrial genomes. Trends Genet. 1992;8:128–132. [PubMed]
15. Gray MW, Burger G, Lang BF. Mitochondrial evolution. Science. 1999;283:1476–1481. [PubMed]
16. Palmer JD, Adams KL, Cho Y, Parkinson CL, Qiu YL, et al. Dynamic evolution of plant mitochondrial genomes: mobile genes and introns and highly variable mutation rates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:6960–6966. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Boore JL. Animal mitochondrial genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999;27:1767–1780. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Lynch M, Koskella B, Schaack S. Mutation pressure and the evolution of organelle genomic architecture. Science. 2006;311:1727–1730. [PubMed]
19. Zimmerly S, Hausner G, Wu X. Phylogenetic relationships among group II intron ORFs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29:1238–1250. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Knoop V, Kloska S, Brennicke A. On the identification of group II introns in nucleotide sequence data. J Mol Biol. 1994;242:389–396. [PubMed]
21. Pontes MH, Dale C. Culture and manipulation of insect facultative symbionts. Trends Microbiol. 2006;14:406–412. [PubMed]
22. Kondo N, Nikoh N, Ijichi N, Shimada M, Fukatsu T. Genome fragment of Wolbachia endosymbiont transferred to X chromosome of host insect. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:14280–14285. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Clark ME. Later stages of regeneration in the Polychaete, Nephtys. J Morphol. 1968;124:483–510. [PubMed]
24. Clark ME, Clark RB. Growth and regeneration in Nephtys. Zool Jb Physiol. 1962;70:24–90.
25. Dai L, Toor N, Olson R, Keeping A, Zimmerly S. Database for mobile group II introns. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31:424–426. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Lynch M, Conery JS. The origins of genome complexity. Science. 2003;302:1401–1404. [PubMed]
27. van Oppen MJ, Willis BL, Miller DJ. Atypically low rate of cytochrome b evolution in the scleractinian coral genus Acropora. Proc Biol Sci. 1999;266:179–183. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
28. Shearer TL, Van Oppen MJ, Romano SL, Worheide G. Slow mitochondrial DNA sequence evolution in the Anthozoa (Cnidaria). Mol Ecol. 2002;11:2475–2487. [PubMed]
29. Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol. 1994;3:294–299. [PubMed]
30. Ewing B, Green P. Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. II. Error probabilities. Genome Res. 1998;8:186–194. [PubMed]
31. Ewing B, Hillier L, Wendl MC, Green P. Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. I. Accuracy assessment. Genome Res. 1998;8:175–185. [PubMed]
32. Gordon D, Abajian C, Green P. Consed: a graphical tool for sequence finishing. Genome Res. 1998;8:195–202. [PubMed]
33. Wyman SK, Jansen RK, Boore JL. Automatic annotation of organellar genomes with DOGMA. Bioinformatics. 2004;20:3252–3255. [PubMed]
34. Zuker M. Mfold web server for nucleic acid folding and hybridization prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31:3406–3415. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
35. Morgenstern B. DIALIGN 2: improvement of the segment-to-segment approach to multiple sequence alignment. Bioinformatics. 1999;15:211–218. [PubMed]
36. Castresana J. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2000;17:540–552. [PubMed]
37. Stamatakis A, Ludwig T, Meier H. RAxML-III: a fast program for maximum likelihood-based inference of large phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics. 2005;21:456–463. [PubMed]
38. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. The ClustalX windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Research. 1997;24:4876–4882. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
39. Posada D, Crandall KA. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics. 1998;14:817–818. [PubMed]
40. Swofford DL. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Version 4.0 b10; In: Sinauer Associates S, editor. Massachusetts: 2000.
41. Lambowitz AM, Belfort M. Introns as mobile genetic elements. Annu Rev Biochem. 1993;62:587–622. [PubMed]

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of Public Library of Science

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...