• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of jexpmedHomeThe Rockefeller University PressThis articleEditorsContactInstructions for AuthorsThis issue
J Exp Med. Feb 17, 2003; 197(4): 451–460.
PMCID: PMC2193859

T Cell Regulation as a Side Effect of Homeostasis and Competition

Abstract

We have previously hypothesized that maintaining a balanced peripheral immune system may not be the sole responsibility of a specialized subset of T cells dedicated to immune regulation, but also a side effect of normal competition for shared resources within an intact immune system. Here we show that regulatory activity is correlated with high homeostatic expansion potential, reflecting the avidity for self-peptide:MHC complexes. Monoclonal transgenic T cells with high homeostatic expansion potential and lacking characteristics previously associated with regulatory function were able to regulate wasting disease induced by transfer of a small number of naive CD45RBhi CD4 T cells into lymphopenic hosts. Self-regulatory function is also found in the naive polyclonal T cell repertoire depleted of CD25+ T cells. T cells capable of preventing immune pathology, like the transgenic T cells, express higher than average levels of CD5, an indicator of avidity for self:MHC peptide complexes. We therefore propose that dysregulated expansion of potentially pathogenic T cells in a lymphopenic environment can be prevented by members of the naive T cell repertoire, irrespective of their specificity, as a side effect of their response to homeostatic and antigenic stimulation.

Keywords: T cell regulation, homeostasis, lymphopenia, immune pathology, CD4 T cells

Introduction

Regulation or control of responsiveness is an intrinsic property of the immune system. Excessive T cell responses to self-antigens (autoimmune disease) or innocuous environmental antigens (allergy) are usually prevented in the vast majority of individuals. Furthermore, maximal responses to foreign antigens are also normally controlled by a number of mechanisms, including competition between responding T cells. This phenomenon is thought to be responsible for affinity maturation of the T cell response (1) and helps prevent disproportionate damage to self (immunopathology). The control mechanisms that maintain a stable and diverse repertoire of naive and memory T cells in a healthy functional immune system (2, 3) are severely compromised in lymphopenic mice. For instance, thymectomy shortly after birth or transfer of small numbers of T cells into T cell–deficient hosts are consistently associated with immunopathology and an array of autoimmune diseases (48). Furthermore, responses to cognate antigens are also exaggerated in lymphopenic hosts (9). Thus, lymphopenia is invariably associated not only with homeostatic expansion of the remaining T cells in response to endogenous MHC ligands and IL-7, but also with immune reactivity both to self- and foreign antigens that would not normally be apparent in T cell–replete hosts.

Suppression of immune reactivity is currently attributed to a population of regulatory T cells dedicated to maintaining peripheral tolerance to self-antigens or preventing harmful immunopathological responses (for a review, see reference 10). Regulatory T cells, obtained from unmanipulated hosts, are defined by markers such as CD25 (11) and CTLA-4 (12, 13) and more recently expression of the glucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor receptor family related gene (GITR; references 14 and 15) and may mediate their function via release of inhibitory cytokines such as TGF-β and IL-10 (1619) and/or cell contact dependent mechanisms (14, 20). Although T cell–mediated regulation of immune pathology is amply documented, it is not well understood how many different types of regulatory T cells there might be, how they are related and how they function.

We have previously suggested that maintaining a balanced peripheral immune system may not be the sole responsibility of a specialized subset of T cells dedicated to immune regulation, but rather a side effect of normal competition for shared resources within an intact immune system (21). To demonstrate that T cell competition for shared resources, independent of specificity, or effector function can achieve T cell regulation, we employed one of the most widely used animal models for studies of regulatory T cells. In this model severe gut pathology and wasting disease are induced by transfer of a small number of naive CD45RBhi CD4 T cells into lymphopenic hosts and pathology is prevented by cotransfer of cells from the reciprocal CD45RBlo subset, especially those that also express CD25. To demonstrate that competition for space by T cells that do not have any of the characteristics associated with regulatory T cells, can underlie regulatory activity we employed monoclonal TCR transgenic T cells. We show here that cotransfer of AND T cells with a defined antigenic specificity unrelated to that of the pathological response can protect mice from pathology as well as CD25+CD45RBlo T cells. Regulatory function of AND T cells did not require acquisition of markers previously associated with regulatory function, but was correlated with exceptionally high homeostatic expansion potential. Furthermore, even monoclonal CD8 T cells from the OT-I strain which expand considerably, if less than AND T cells, in lymphopenic hosts afforded at least partial protection.

In addition, we demonstrate here that T cells with properties similar to AND T cells can also be found in the polyclonal naive CD4 T cell repertoire depleted of CD25+ T cells. Such T cells, like AND T cells show increased homeostatic expansion and express high levels of CD5, reflecting their avidity for self-peptide:MHC complexes (22, 23). CD5, a negative regulator of TCR signaling (24), is up-regulated during thymic differentiation and ensures that thymocytes with high avidity for self peptide:MHC complexes are not overtly self-reactive in the periphery because they display lower responsiveness to self-antigen (25). On the other hand, CD5hi T cells possess higher homeostatic expansion potential to self peptide:MHC signals than their CD5lo counterparts (26). Cells that are involved in negative regulation may therefore be members of the naive T cell repertoire that fulfill this function not as their sole purpose, but rather as a side effect of their response to homeostatic and antigenic stimulation.

Materials and Methods

Mice.

Mice of strain A (H-2a) and C57BL/10 (H-2b), wild-type and backcrossed onto a Rag-1−/− background, and TCR transgenic AND mice, on a Rag-1−/− H-2a MHC and Rag-1−/− H-2b background, as well as OT-I Rag1−/− mice were bred and maintained in the animal facilities of the National Institute for Medical Research in accordance with established guidelines.

Flow Cytometry.

Conjugated mAb were purchased from BD Biosciences and flow cytometric analyses were performed using standard staining procedures on FACScan™ and FACSCalibur™ cytometers with CELLQuest™ software. For intracellular cytokine stainings mesenteric lymph node cell suspensions were stimulated for 4 h with PdBU and ionomycin (both at 50 ng/ml). For the last 2 h Brefeldin A (10 μg/ml) was added to the cultures. Cells were washed and stained for CD4 and Vα11, fixed in 1% PFA, and permeabilized in 0.1% NP-40. After washing, unspecific staining was blocked with anti-FcR (2.4G2) and cells were stained with anti–IL-10 APC in conjunction with anti–IFN-γ PE or anti–IL-2 PE. Intracellular CTLA-4 staining was performed without the PdBU/ionomycin stimulation step.

Cell Sorting and Adoptive Transfer Experiments.

Single cell suspensions of spleen and lymph nodes from 6- to 10-wk-old donor mice were enriched for CD4 T cells using magnetic beads conjugated with CD4 beads (Miltenyi Biotech) on an AutoMACS. Thereafter CD4 cells were sorted on a MoFlo cytometer according to CD45RB, CD25, and CD5 expression as stated in the respective experiments. Between 2 and 4 × 105 (unless otherwise stated) CD4 T cells were injected intravenously. In cotransfer experiments equal numbers of each T cell population were injected. Recipient mice were weighed weekly and the weight on the day of injection was set as 100%. Mice were culled when 20% weight loss occurred and/or excessive diarrhea developed. The assessment of mean survival time therefore corresponds with the time point of 20% weight loss.

In Vitro Experiments.

In vitro suppression experiments were done as described previously (27). Briefly, 5 × 104 sorted CD45RBhi CD4 T cells were cultured in 96-well flat bottom plates with 5 × 104 irradiated (3,000 Rad) Rag−/− spleen cells in the presence of 0.5 μg/ml anti CD3 (2C11) mAb. Increasing numbers of sorted ex vivo AND H-2a Rag−/− CD4 T cells, or AND H-2a Rag−/− CD4 T cells resorted after transfer (4 × 105 AND T cells transferred into Rag−/− H-2a hosts 8 wk before the experiment) or sorted CD25+CD45RBlo CD4 T cells were added to the cultures. After 48 h, supernatants were taken and analyzed for IL-2 content in standard CTLL assay.

Results

Co-transfer of CD4 T Cells from AND Rag−/− Mice Prevents Immune Pathology in H-2a, but Not H-2b Recipients of CD45RBhi CD4 T Cells.

Transfer of low numbers of CD4 T cells expressing CD45RB at high levels into lymphopenic recipients results in immune pathology characterized by a wasting disease with severe weight loss, diarrhea, and development of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD; reference 5). This can be prevented by cotransfer of CD45RBlo CD4 T cells and specifically those that also express CD25 (11). To test our hypothesis that competition for space between T cell populations might underlie the protective effect we chose as ‘regulatory’ population a monoclonal transgenic T cell population with known antigenic specificity unrelated to that involved in development of gut pathology in this system. Lymphopenic Rag−/− mice on an H-2a MHC background (i.e., expressing class II Ak and Ek molecules) were injected either with 2 × 105 sorted CD45RBhi CD4 T cells from H-2a mice only or with a mixture of CD45RBhi CD4 T cells (2 × 105 of each) and CD4 T cells from the AND Rag−/− strain expressing H-2Ek or CD45RBlo CD4 T cells which contain regulatory T cells. AND T cells are known to rapidly divide upon transfer into H-2Ek containing hosts (28, 29). From ~4 wk after transfer all recipients of CD45RBhi CD4 T cells alone lost weight and eventually developed severe diarrhea so that they had to be culled around 6–7 wk after transfer (Fig. 1 a, top row left). None of the animals that received AND Rag−/− T cells together with CD45RBhi T cells developed such symptoms (Fig. 1 a, top row right) and at termination of the experiment these mice were as healthy as mice that had received cotransfer of CD45RBlo T cells (Fig. 1 a, top row middle).

Figure 1.
TCR transgenic AND Rag−/− CD4 T cells from H-2Ek+, but not H-2Ab+ mice can regulate CD45RBhi T cells in lymphopenic hosts. (A) Equal numbers (2 × 105) of CD45RBhi and CD45RBlo or AND Rag−/− T cells (all H-2a) were ...

Monitoring of CD4 T cell expansion in blood (Fig. 1 a, middle row) over 50 d and in lymphoid organs upon termination of the experiment (Fig. 1 a, bottom row) showed dramatic expansion of CD4 T cells in recipients of CD45RBhi CD4 T cells, whereas there was no equivalent expansion over time in recipients cotransferred with AND Rag−/− T cells or CD45RBlo. On the other hand AND T cells expanded enormously for the first 7 d after transfer as evident from the proportion of AND T cells present in blood on day 7. Although the number of AND T cells in blood decreased from day 7 after transfer, they still comprised 35% of the cells in mesenteric lymph nodes and more than 10% in spleen 50 d later (Fig. 1 a, bottom row). Expansion of polyclonal CD4 T cells was most prominent in the mesenteric lymph nodes draining the gut, but was strongly reduced in mice that had been cotransferred with AND T cells.

While AND T cells are known to have exceptionally high expansion potential in H-2Ek expressing hosts, AND T cells on an H-2b background that also selects this T cell receptor undergo more limited expansion in lymphopenic hosts (28). We therefore performed a similar experiment transferring CD45RBhi CD4 T cells from H-2b hosts with AND T cells or CD45RBlo cells from H-2b donors into Rag−/− H-2b mice. In this case cotransfer of AND T cells did not protect the recipients from weight loss and development of diarrhea, whereas CD45RBlo cells prevented all symptoms of gut pathology (Fig. 1 b, top panel). Analysis of the CD4 T cell numbers revealed that AND T cells from H-2b mice did not expand extensively and also did not prevent the expansion of the injected CD45RBhi population (Fig. 1 b, bottom panel).

AND T cells did not express markers typically associated with regulatory T cells, such as CD25 or CTLA-4 at the time of transfer (Fig. 2 a), nor did they acquire a ‘classical’ regulatory phenotype during their expansion in vivo (Fig. 2 b). All AND T cells harvested from protected mice 8 wk after transfer have an activated phenotype judged by high levels of CD44 expression, but did not express CD25. Their cytokine potential as revealed after restimulation in vitro revealed IL-2 and γ-interferon activity, but no IL-10 production (Fig. 2 c).

Figure 2.
Activation markers and cytokine expression. (A) Polyclonal and AND Rag−/− CD4 T cells (all H-2a) were stained for CD25 and intracellular CTLA-4 (shaded histograms = isotype control). (B) CD25 and CD44 expression on polyclonal and AND Rag ...

A summary of experiments (endpoints 8–15 wk after transfer) shown in Table I demonstrates that 75% of mice which had received cotransfer of AND H-2a T cells were protected from disease similar to mice that had received cotransfer of CD45RBlo T cells (85% protected), whereas only 10% of mice injected with CD45RBhi T cells alone did not develop pathology. On an H-2b background AND T cells were unable to protect recipients against colitis, whereas 100% of mice that received cotransfer of CD45RBlo T cells remained healthy. Thus, these experiments show an intriguing correlation between regulatory activity and the capacity for expansion in a lymphopenic environment.

Table I.
Summary of Adoptive Transfer Experiments with AND TCRtg CD4 T Cells

AND T Cells Are Not Suppressive In Vitro.

Numerous reports have shown in vitro suppressive activity of the CD25+ T cell population (for a review, see reference 30). To assess whether the regulatory function of AND T cells would be detectable in vitro, we set up standard mixtures of T cells with irradiated spleen cells and anti-CD3 stimulation. Coculture of fresh CD25+ T cells suppressed IL-2 production and proliferation of CD45RBhi T cells as previously reported. However, AND T cells, taken either ex vivo as naive T cells or after expansion in a lymphopenic host, did not show any suppressive effect in vitro (Fig. 3 , left panel). On their own, CD3 stimulated AND T cells produced IL-2, but much lower amounts than the polyclonal CD45RBhi population (Fig. 3, right panel) whereas CD25+ CD4 T cells did not make IL-2 at all. This indicates that AND T cells do not share the ability for in vitro suppression. On the other hand, in vivo suppression by both CD25+ CD4 T cells and AND T cells led to indistinguishable outcomes. Thus, in vitro suppression is not a prerequisite and might be of limited predictive value for in vivo regulation.

Figure 3.
AND T cells do not suppress in vitro Sorted naive ex vivo AND T cells ([filled square], □), sorted AND T cells after homeostatic expansion in a lymphopenic host (•, ○), or sorted ex vivo CD25+ T cells ([filled triangle], [open triangle]) were cultured ...

Homeostatically Expanding CD8 T Cells Offer Partial Protection.

While the AND TCR transgenic strain served as an example of a monoclonal T cell population that was able to regulate immune pathology irrespective of its unrelated antigenic specificity and phenotype, the expansion capacity of AND T cells in lymphopenic hosts is exceptional and does not resemble that of any other TCR transgenic strain. One might therefore be concerned to link protective function to homeostatic expansion potential based on this strain alone. To further substantiate our claim that homeostatic expansion of transgenic T cells in a lymphopenic host can interfere with the induction of immune pathology by CD45RBhi polyclonal T cells, we used another TCR transgenic strain on a Rag−/− background, OT-I. CD8 T cells from the OT-I strain have been shown to undergo substantial expansion and phenotypic conversion upon transfer into lymphopenic hosts (31). As CD4 and CD8 T cells to some extent share a peripheral niche (3), homeostatic expansion of one population would be expected to affect the other. Although OT-I T cells divide extensively, their proliferation is much less pronounced than that of AND T cells, illustrated by the CFSE profile shown in Fig. 4 a. Nevertheless, cotransfer of OT-I T cells had a strong effect on immune pathology caused by CD4 CD45RBhi T cells, delaying the onset of disease and protecting 50% of the mice completely.

Figure 4.
CD8 T cells from OT-I show regulatory activity. (A) OT-I H-2b and AND Rag−/− H-2a T cells were labeled with CFSE and transferred into corresponding syngeneic Rag−/− hosts. The CFSE profiles were assessed 7 d later. (B) ...

Self-regulation by High Numbers of CD45RBhi CD4 T Cells.

Excessive expansion may be more pronounced with a small inoculum of T cells that encounters unlimited resources than with larger numbers of T cells that would compete amongst each other for factors controlling their expansion. To test this assumption, we compared groups of mice that received either 4 × 105, 6 × 106, or 12 × 106 sorted CD45RBhiCD25 CD4 T cells (Fig. 5 a). While the recipients of the smallest cell dose had all developed symptoms of colitis by 3–4 wk (Fig. 5 b), transfer of higher numbers of T cells showed either partial protection, preventing disease in 3 out of 5 animals (Fig. 5 b, left) or in the case of the highest dose complete protection (Fig. 5 b, right). T cells in lymphoid organs from recipients of the high dose of CD45RBhi cells were not all activated, as shown by retention of the CD45RBhi marker in 26% of the cells compared with 9% of the cells from recipients of the low dose (Fig. 5 c, top panel). Furthermore, while 92% of the transferred T cells found in recipients of small numbers of CD45RBhi cells expressed high levels of CD44 indicating their activation, only 58% of the T cells in mice that had received high doses of CD45RBhi cells showed an activated phenotype (Fig. 5 c, bottom panel). This finding is compatible with the hypothesis that competition with neighboring T cells for limited resources may restrain excessive activation and outgrowth of transferred T cells.

Figure 5.Figure 5.
Transfer of high numbers of CD45RBhi CD4 T cells does not lead to immune pathology. (A) Phenotype of sorted CD45RBhi CD25 negative and CD45RBlo CD25 positive CD4 T cells. (B) 4 × 105 (○, n = 5) and 6 × 106 (•, n = 5) or ...

Immune Regulation by CD5hiCD45RBhi Polyclonal T Cells.

Self-regulation after transfer of large numbers of CD45RBhiCD25 T cells into lymphopenic hosts indicated the existence of a subset of T cells within this population which, similarly to AND T cells, could inhibit the development of immune pathology. Although AND T cells might represent an extreme example, we hypothesized that T cells with similar properties that might make them ‘regulatory’ are also contained in the polyclonal repertoire. Extrapolating from the behavior of AND T cells transferred into H-2Ek+ recipients, such cells would be expected to have high avidity for self-peptide:MHC. One of the hallmarks of avidity for self peptide:MHC is the level of expression of CD5, a negative regulator of TCR signaling. As the strength of interaction with self-peptide: MHC is reflected in the levels of expression of CD5, we compared CD5 expression on AND cells and polyclonal CD45RBhi T cells. As shown in Fig. 6 a, CD5 expression on AND T cells on an H-2Ek+ background falls within the high range of expression levels on polyclonal T cells, correlating well with their reported high avidity for self peptide:MHC. CD5 expression of AND T cells on an H-2b background, on the other hand, falls within the lower expression levels of polyclonal T cells in agreement with their reported lower avidity (32). When analyzing T cells in adoptive hosts of CD45RBhi T cells that succumbed to disease (transfer of low T cell numbers middle panel) with those that remained healthy (transfer of high T cell numbers top panel), it was clear that healthy mice contained a larger proportion of CD5hi T cells, whereas in sick animals CD5lo T cells predominated (Fig. 6 b). We therefore hypothesized that CD5lo T cells may be enriched in potentially pathogenic T cells. These may normally be kept in check by CD5hi T cells in the repertoire that out compete them due to their higher avidity for self peptide:MHC complexes on APCs; their decreased responsiveness to cognate antigens, on the other hand, would make CD5hi T cells less likely to cause immune pathology themselves.

Figure 6.
CD45RBhi CD5hi CD4 T cells act as regulatory T cells. (A) CD5 expression on AND CD4 T cells (shaded histogram) and on polyclonal CD4 T cells (open histogram) on different MHC backgrounds. (B) CD5 expression on peripheral CD4 T cells from experiment described ...

To test this hypothesis, CD45RBhiCD25 T cells were sorted for low and high CD5 expression and 3 × 105 sorted CD5hi or CD5lo (see Fig. 6 c) were transferred into lymphopenic hosts and compared with unseparated CD45RBhiCD25 cells (Fig. 6 d). Mice that received CD45RBhi CD25 T cells all developed disease with a mean survival time of 44.3 ± 11.9 d after injection. Mice that received the sorted CD5lo population succumbed to disease significantly earlier with a mean survival time of 30.1 ± 6.5 d (P < 0.005). In contrast, onset of disease in recipients of the CD5hi subset was substantially delayed (mean survival time 57.1 ± 12.0 d, P < 0.05) and 40% of them remained healthy. CD5 levels on sorted populations did not change after transfer in vivo (Fig. 6 e). This suggests that the predominance of CD5hi and CD5lo T cells in healthy and sick animals respectively (Fig. 6 b) is the result of selection and expansion rather than of conversion. These results further emphasize that there are cells, distinct from CD25+ cells, in the normal T cell repertoire that can regulate the development of immune pathology. This happens irrespective of antigen specificity by virtue of their high responsiveness to homeostatic signals in lymphopenic hosts.

Discussion

Regulation of peripheral T cell responses is an essential feature in the immune system, preventing not only the development of autoimmune disease, but also excessive responses to ‘foreign’ antigens that could lead to immune pathology. Maintenance of tolerance to self in the periphery as well as prevention of exaggerated outgrowth of activated T cells after their stimulation by foreign antigen are fundamentally important functions of the immune system. Robustness in the mechanisms to achieve these goals is therefore expected and indeed a vast variety of peripheral mechanisms have been described to exist for this purpose. These include peripheral deletion (33, 34), differential action of cytokines, including TGF-β (35) or IL-10- production (36), self-antigen presentation by immature rather than mature dendritic cells (37) or induction of anergy after suboptimal activation (38, 39), restriction of clonal expansion by CTLA-4 (40), and Fas/Fas ligand interactions (41).

We have focused on the regulation of lymphopenia associated immune pathology induced by an excessive T cell response, presumably directed against commensal microorganisms of the gut. The mouse model used in our experiments is one of the most commonly used in vivo models for the study of regulatory T cells. However, the principles of regulation put forward in our study may also apply for autoimmune diseases, such as diabetes in the NOD mouse or BB rat model both of which exhibit a degree of lymphopenia (42, 43). We have shown here, using the extreme example of a monoclonal T cell receptor transgenic T cell populations, that T cells lacking characteristic markers ascribed to the regulatory lineage can function as regulatory T cells. It should be emphasized that neither regulation by monoclonal AND T cells nor self-regulation by high numbers of CD45RBhiCD25 T cells correlated with expression of CD25, although CD25+ T cells emerge in polyclonal T cells even if they are transferred as CD45RBhiCD25 cells, as also noted by Annacker et al. (44). In fact, AND T cells from H-2b donors show a marked increase in CD25+ cells after transfer into lymphopenic hosts, yet these T cells failed to act as regulatory T cells (45). Other studies have shown that CD25 cells can have regulatory capacity and it was suggested that both CD4+CD25+ and CD4+CD25 regulatory cells exist (46, 47).

While it is highly unlikely that AND only regulate because they differentiate into one of the currently described types of regulatory T cells in vivo, their capacity for regulation correlated with rapid expansion potential in response to endogenous MHC–peptide ligands in lymphopenic hosts. Representative data on polyclonal CD4 T cell expansion suggest that AND reflect the behavior of a minor (1%) subset of polyclonal T cells that divide more than 8 times within 7 d after transfer into lymphopenic hosts (48). Previous studies using monoclonal transgenic T cells as a source of regulatory T cells did not observe inhibition of either EAE (49) or gastritis (50). It is not clear, however, in these different experimental models if T cells from the DO-11–10 strain used could expand early and sufficiently enough to out-compete either polyclonal or MBP-specific T cells even when subjected to immunization with ovalbumin. The expansion potential of AND T cells is exceptional and not shared by any other TCR transgenic population available so that one could rightfully be concerned about their representative value. However, we obtained similar results with a monoclonal transgenic CD8 population which divide substantially, if less than AND T cells, upon transfer into lymphopenic mice. OT-I T cells offered at least partial protection, supporting our claim that homeostatic expansion and the resulting competition for shared resources impacts on regulation of immune responses irrespective of specificity and phenotype of the protective T cell population. Their reduced efficiency compared with AND T cells could be due to less exaggerated proliferation or might also reflect differential homeostatic requirements. Although naive CD4 and CD8 T cells share the same peripheral niche (3), resources controlling the number of activated/memory CD4 and CD8 T cells, while partially overlapping (51), are not identical (52, 53) so that one might expect only partial competition between activated CD4 and CD8 T cells.

While our data do not rule out that regulatory cells function via release of inhibitory mediators such as IL-10 and/or TGF-β, they nevertheless suggest that a certain degree of expansion is an essential prerequisite for manifestation of regulatory function in vivo under conditions of lymphopenia. It is important to stress that regulatory function in vivo need not correlate with suppressive activity in vitro, as we show in these experiments. As far as the contribution of homeostatic expansion to regulation is concerned, this is understandable, as proliferation in lymphopenic hosts takes place only in the microenvironment of lymphoid organs (54) that would not be mimicked by any in vitro suspension culture.

Lymphocyte diversity can prevent the outgrowth of potentially harmful cells by lymphocyte competition. In contrast, lymphopenia is invariably associated with homeostatic expansion of the remaining T cells, resulting in an oligoclonal repertoire of a few clones that may become irreversibly dominant and cause pathology (55). Although the rules that regulate T cell homeostasis are not entirely understood, naive T cells depend on self-peptide:MHC and IL-7 signals for expansion, whereas for T cells with an activated phenotype such as CD25+ T cells IL-7 signals are not essential for further expansion (56). Naive T cells exhibit variable degrees of homeostatic expansion, reflecting their avidity for self peptide:MHC complexes and in some cases homeostatic expansion can lead to activation, such that all cells acquire characteristics typical for memory T cells. This is exemplified by AND T cells which can be selected on both H-2Ek for which they have very high affinity and H-2Ab for which they have lower affinity (32), reflected in dramatic proliferation and activation of AND T cells from H-2Ek mice transferred into an H-2Ek environment and more limited proliferation in an H-2b background (28, 54). Similarly OT-I T cells were shown to divide in response to self peptide:MHC ligands resulting in acquisition of an activated phenotype (31).

T cell avidity for self peptide:MHC complexes not only influences their potential for homeostatic expansion, but also tunes their activation threshold in response to cognate antigen. Up-regulation of CD5, a negative regulator of TCR signaling, in the thymus ensures that thymocytes with high avidity for self peptide:MHC are not overtly self-reactive in the periphery because they display lower responsiveness to cognate antigen (23). On the other hand CD5hi T cells possess higher homeostatic expansion potential in response to self peptide:MHC signals than their CD5lo counterparts (26). AND T cells on an H-2Ek background fulfill these criteria, being CD5hi, relatively insensitive to CD3 stimulation, with a very high homeostatic potential and the capacity to regulate expansion of other T cells. We have shown here that polyclonal CD4 T cells, depleted of putative regulatory T cells (CD45RBlo CD25+), exhibit self-regulatory activity, provided they are injected in higher numbers. While the higher homeostatic expansion potential of CD5hi T cells is not evident in completely lymphopenic mice, presumably due to the excess of resources in that situation, they expand more than CD5lo T cells in partially lymphopenic hosts (26). This would explain why CD5hi T cells in the CD45RBhi inoculum can prevent immune pathology in recipients of higher (12 × 106) T cell numbers, whereas they can only delay it in recipients of low T cell numbers (see Figs. 4 and and5).5). Therefore, T cell regulation by transgenic T cells or self-regulation by high numbers of CD45RBhiCD25 CD4 T cells might simply be the result of competition for limited homeostatic signals such as IL-7 and MHC.

However, there are more levels of competition involved in immune regulation. CD25+ T cells are likely to compete with any other T cell for access to antigen-carrying APCs and growth factors such as IL-2. IL-2 signaling may be involved in the regulatory function (46, 5759) and might underlie the differential capacities of AND versus CD25+ cells for in vitro regulation. Moreover, activated T cells may directly or indirectly inhibit the expansion of rival T cells by secretion of inhibitory cytokines, such as IL-10 and TGF-β, both of which have been implicated in T cell regulation (35, 36). Expression of CTLA-4, another ‘marker’ for regulatory T cells, represents yet another mechanism by which activated T cells control their own expansion, and presumably the expansion of other T cells via induction of TGF-β (60).

The origin of CD45RBloCD25+ found in the normal T cell repertoire is currently unknown. Their functional properties however, suggest that they may represent T cells, which have acquired an activated phenotype by high avidity interactions either in the thymus (57, 61) or the periphery. Interestingly, CD25+ regulatory T cells have also been reported to express high levels of CD5 (11), thus representing T cells with high avidity for self-peptide:MHC; their poor responsiveness to TCR stimulation in vitro and in vivo is well documented (20, 62, 63). The CD25+ T cell population might also include effector cells transiently responding to their cognate antigen at that time. Therefore there may exist, in addition to the independently regulated pools of naive and memory T cells (3), a regulated pool of effector T cells, which employs exploitation and interference competition strategies to inhibit the expansion of rival T cells as a bystander effect of their own expansion. The existence of such a pool could also explain enhanced responses to nonimmunogenic tumors observed upon depletion of CD4+CD25+ cells (64, 65), suggesting that depletion of the effector pool can make otherwise limited resources available to the next wave of responding T cells.

In conclusion, our results show that T cell regulation, at least in partially or fully lymphopenic states, can be effected by members of the normal T cell repertoire. These need not be dedicated suppressor T cells, but instead regulate T cell responses as a side effect of their own response to homeostatic and antigenic stimulation. Such context dependent regulation has been proposed earlier on theoretical grounds (66). Lymphopenia per se constitutes a high-risk scenario for the development of pathological or autoimmune responses, yet so far little attention has been given to the contribution of lymphocyte homeostasis and competition in prevention of immune dysregulation. Thus, further definition of the mechanisms responsible for immune regulation will inevitably depend on our understanding of the consequences of perturbations in the control mechanisms that maintain a balanced peripheral immune system.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank A. Grimm for technical assistance, T. Norton and K. Williams for maintenance of our mice, and Drs. A. O'Garra, B. Seddon, and R. Zamoyska for critical comments and suggestions during preparation of the manuscript.

G. Kassiotis is the recipient of a Wellcome Traveling Fellowship.

References

1. Kedl, R.M., B.C. Schaefer, J.W. Kappler, and P. Marrack. 2002. T cells down-modulate peptide-MHC complexes on APCs in vivo. Nat. Immunol. 3:27–32. [PubMed]
2. Freitas, A.A., and B. Rocha. 1999. Peripheral T cell survival. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 11:152–156. [PubMed]
3. Tanchot, C., and B. Rocha. 1998. The organization of mature T-cell pools. Immunol. Today. 19:575–579. [PubMed]
4. Groux, H., and F. Powrie. 1999. Regulatory T cells and inflammatory bowel disease. Immunol. Today. 20:442–445. [PubMed]
5. Powrie, F., M.W. Leach, S. Mauze, L.B. Caddle, and R.L. Coffman. 1993. Phenotypically distinct subsets of CD4+ T cells induce or protect from chronic intestinal inflammation in C. B-17 scid mice. Int. Immunol. 5:1461–1471. [PubMed]
6. Gleeson, P.A., B.-H. Toh, and I.R. van Driel. 1996. Organ-specific autoimmunity induced by lymphopenia. Immunol. Rev. 149:97–125. [PubMed]
7. Sakaguchi, S. 2000. Regulatory T cells: key controllers of immunologic self-tolerance. Cell. 101:455–458. [PubMed]
8. Shevach, E.M. 2000. Suppressor T cells: Rebirth, function and homeostasis. Curr. Biol. 10:R572–R575. [PubMed]
9. Fry, T.J., and C.L. Mackall. 2001. Interleukin-7: master regulator of peripheral T cell homeostasis. Trends Immunol. 22:564–571. [PubMed]
10. Powrie, F., K.J. Maloy, and F. Powrie. 2001. Regulatory T cells in the control of immune pathology. Nat. Immunol. 2:816–822. [PubMed]
11. Sakaguchi, S., N. Sakaguchi, M. Asano, M. Itoh, and M. Toda. 1995. Immunologic self-tolerance maintained by activated T cells expressing IL-2 receptor alpha-chains (CD25). Breakdown of a single mechanism of self-tolerance causes various autoimmune diseases. J. Immunol. 155:1151–1164. [PubMed]
12. Read, S., V. Malmstrom, and F. Powrie. 2000. Cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 plays an essential role in the function of CD25+CD4+ regulatory cells that control intestinal inflammation. J. Exp. Med. 192:295–302. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Takahashi, T., T. Tagami, S. Yamazaki, T. Uede, J. Shimizu, N. Sakaguchi, T.W. Mak, and S. Sakaguchi. 2000. Immunologic self-tolerance maintained by CD25+CD4+ regulatory T cells constitutively expressing cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4. J. Exp. Med. 192:303–310. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Shimizu, J., S. Yamazaki, T. Takahashi, Y. Ishida, and S. Sakaguchi. 2002. Stimulation of CD25(+)CD4(+) regulatory T cells through GITR breaks immunological self-tolerance. Nat. Immunol. 3:135–142. [PubMed]
15. McHugh, R.S., M.J. Whitters, C.A. Piccirillo, D.A. Young, E.M. Shevach, M. Collins, and M.C. Byrne. 2002. CD4(+)CD25(+) immunoregulatory T cells: gene expression analysis reveals a functional role for the glucocorticoid-induced TNF receptor. Immunity. 16:311–323. [PubMed]
16. Seddon, B., and D. Mason. 1999. Regulatory T cells in the control of autoimmunity: the essential role of transforming growth factor beta and interleukin 4 in the prevention of autoimmune thyroiditis in rats by peripheral CD4+CD45RC cells and CD4+CD8 thymocytes. J. Exp. Med. 189:279–288. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Bridoux, F., A. Badou, A. Saoudi, I. Bernard, E. Druet, R. Pasquier, P. Druet, and L. Pelletier. 1997. Transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta)-dependent inhibition of T helper cell 2 (Th2)-induced autoimmunity by self-major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II-specific, regulatory CD4+ T cell lines. J. Exp. Med. 185:1769–1775. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Groux, H., A. O'Garra, M. Bigler, M. Rouleau, S. Antonenko, J.E. de Vries, and M.G. Roncarolo. 1997. A CD4+ T-cell subset inhibits antigen-specific T-cell responses and prevents colitis. Nature. 389:737–742. [PubMed]
19. Powrie, F., J. Carlino, M.W. Leach, S. Mauze, and R.L. Coffman. 1996. A critical role for transforming growth factor-beta but not interleukin 4 in the suppression of T helper type 1-mediated colitis by CD45RB(low) CD4+ T cells. J. Exp. Med. 183:2669–2674. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Shevach, E.M. 2000. Regulatory T cells in autoimmunity. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 18:423–449. [PubMed]
21. Stockinger, B., T. Barthlott, and G. Kassiotis. 2001. T cell regulation: a special job or everyone's responsibility? Nat. Immunol. 2:757–758. [PubMed]
22. Ge, Q., V.P. Rao, B.K. Cho, H.N. Eisen, and J. Chen. 2001. Dependence of lymphopenia-induced T cell proliferation on the abundance of peptide/MHC epitopes and strenght of their interaction with T cell receptors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 98:1728–1733. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Wong, P., G.M. Barton, K.A. Forbush, and A.Y. Rudensky. 2001. Dynamic tuning of T cell reactivity by self-peptide-major histocompatibility complex ligands. J. Exp. Med. 193:1179–1187. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Tarakhovsky, A., S.B. Kanner, J. Hombach, J.A. Ledbetter, W. Muller, N. Killeen, and K. Rajewsky. 1995. A role for CD5 in TCR-mediated signal transduction and thymocyte selection. Science. 269:535–537. [PubMed]
25. Azzam, H.S., A. Grinberg, K. Lui, H. Shen, E.W. Shores, and P.E. Love. 1998. CD5 expression is developmentally regulated by T cell receptor (TCR) signals and TCR avidity. J. Exp. Med. 188:2301–2311. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Smith, K., B. Seddon, M.A. Purbhoo, R. Zamoyska, A.G. Fisher, and M. Merkenschlager. 2001. Sensory adaptation in naive peripheral CD4 T cells. J. Exp. Med. 194:1253–1261. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Thornton, A.M., and E.M. Shevach. 1998. CD4+CD25+ immunoregulatory T cells suppress polyclonal T cell activation in vitro by inhibiting interleukin 2 production. J. Exp. Med. 188:287–296. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
28. Tanchot, C., A. Le Campion, S. Leaument, N. Dautigny, and B. Lucas. 2001. Naive CD4(+) lymphocytes convert to anergic or memory-like cells in T cell-deprived recipients. Eur. J. Immunol. 31:2256–2265. [PubMed]
29. Ferreira, C., T. Barthlott, S. Garcia, R. Zamoyska, and B. Stockinger. 2000. Differential survival of naive CD4 and CD8 T cells. J. Immunol. 165:3689–3694. [PubMed]
30. Shevach, E.M. 2002. CD4+ CD25+ suppressor T cells: more questions than answers. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2:389–400. [PubMed]
31. Kieper, W.C., and S.C. Jameson. 1999. Homeostatic expansion and phenotypic conversion of naive T cells in response to self peptide/MHC ligands. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 96:13306–13311. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
32. Kaye, J., G. Kersh, I. Engel, and S.M. Hedrick. 1991. Structure and specificity of the T cell antigen receptor. Semin. Immunol. 3:269–281. [PubMed]
33. Critchfield, J.M., M.K. Racke, J.C. Zuniga-Pflücker, B. Cannella, C.S. Raine, J. Goverman, and M.J. Lenardo. 1994. T cell deletion in high antigen dose therapy of autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Science. 263:1139–1143. [PubMed]
34. Webb, S., C. Morris, and J. Sprent. 1990. Extrathymic tolerance of mature T cells: clonal elimination as a consequence of immunity. Cell. 63:1249–1256. [PubMed]
35. Letterio, J.J., and A.B. Roberts. 1998. Regulation of immune responses by TGF-beta. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 16:137–161. [PubMed]
36. Moore, K.W., R. de Waal Malefyt, R.L. Coffman, and A. O'Garra. 2001. Interleukin-10 and the interleukin-10 receptor. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 19:683–765. [PubMed]
37. Steinman, R.M., S. Turley, I. Mellman, and K. Inaba. 2000. The induction of tolerance by dendritic cells that have captured apoptotic cells. J. Exp. Med. 191:411–416. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
38. Thompson, C.B., and J.P. Allison. 1997. The emerging role of CTLA-4 as an immune attenuator. Immunity. 7:445–450. [PubMed]
39. Mondino, A., A. Khoruts, and M.K. Jenkins. 1996. The anatomy of T-cell activation and tolerance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 93:2245–2252. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
40. Doyle, A.M., A.C. Mullen, A.V. Villarino, A.S. Hutchins, F.A. High, H.W. Lee, C.B. Thompson, and S.L. Reiner. 2001. Induction of cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) restricts clonal expansion of helper T cells. J. Exp. Med. 194:893–902. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
41. Van Parijs, L., D.A. Peterson, and A.K. Abbas. 1998. The Fas/Fas ligand pathway and Bcl-2 regulate T cell responses to model self and foreign antigens. Immunity. 8:265–274. [PubMed]
42. Poussier, P., A.F. Nakhooda, J.A. Falk, C. Lee, and E.B. Marliss. 1982. Lymphopenia and abnormal lymphocyte subsets in the “BB” rat: relationship to the diabetic syndrome. Endocrinology. 110:1825–1827. [PubMed]
43. Pontesilli, O., P. Carotenuto, L.S. Gazda, P.F. Pratt, and S.J. Prowse. 1987. Circulating lymphocyte populations and autoantibodies in non-obese diabetic (NOD) mice: a longitudinal study. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 70:84–93. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
44. Annacker, O., R. Pimenta-Araujo, O. Burlen-Defranoux, T.C. Barbosa, A. Cumano, and A. Bandeira. 2001. CD25(+) CD4(+) T cells regulate the expansion of peripheral CD4 T cells through the production of Il-10. J. Immunol. 166:3008–3018. [PubMed]
45. Tanchot, C., A. Le Campion, B. Martin, S. Leaument, N. Dautigny, and B. Lucas. 2002. Conversion of naive T cells to a memory-like phenotype in lymphopenic hosts is not related to a homeostatic mechanism that fills the peripheral naive T cell pool. J. Immunol. 168:5042–5046. [PubMed]
46. Furtado, G.C., D. Olivares-Villagomez, M.A. Curotto de Lafaille, A.K. Wensky, J.A. Latkowski, and J.J. Lafaille. 2001. Regulatory T cells in spontaneous autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Immunol. Rev. 182:122–134. [PubMed]
47. Stephens, L.A., and D. Mason. 2000. CD25 is a marker for CD4+ thymocytes that prevent autoimmune diabetes in rats, but peripheral T cells with this function are found in both CD25+ and CD25- subpopulations. J. Immunol. 165:3105–3110. [PubMed]
48. Bender, J., T. Mitchell, J. Kappler, and P. Marrack. 1999. CD4+ T cell division in irradiated mice requires peptides distinct from those responsible for thymic selection. J. Exp. Med. 190:367–374. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
49. Olivares-Villagomez, D., A.K. Wensky, Y. Wang, and J.J. Lafaille. 2000. Repertoire requirements of CD4+ T cells that prevent spontaneous autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J. Immunol. 164:5499–5507. [PubMed]
50. Suri-Payer, E., A.Z. Amar, A.M. Thornton, and E.M. Shevach. 1998. CD4+CD25+ T cells inhibit both the induction and effector function of autoreactive T cells and represent a unique lineage of immunoregulatory cells. J. Immunol. 160:1212–1218. [PubMed]
51. Kassiotis, G., S. Garcia, E. Simpson, and B. Stockinger. 2002. Impairment of immunological memory in the absence of MHC despite survival of memory T cells. Nat. Immunol. 3:244–250. [PubMed]
52. Marrack, P., J. Bender, D. Hildeman, M. Jordan, T. Mitchell, M. Murakami, A. Sakamoto, B.C. Schaefer, B. Swanson, and J. Kappler. 2000. Homeostasis of alpha beta TCR+ T cells. Nat. Immunol. 1:107–111. [PubMed]
53. Sprent, J., and C.D. Surh. 2001. Generation and maintenance of memory T cells. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 13:248–254. [PubMed]
54. Dummer, W., B. Ernst, E. LeRoy, D. Lee, and C. Surh. 2001. Autologous regulation of naive T cell homeostasis within the T cell compartment. J. Immunol. 166:2460–2468. [PubMed]
55. Freitas, A.A., and B. Rocha. 2000. Population Biology of lymphocytes: the flight for survival. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 18:83–111. [PubMed]
56. Schluns, K.S., W.C. Kieper, S.C. Jameson, and L. Lefrancois. 2000. Interleukin-7 mediates the homeostasis of naive and memory CD8 T cells in vivo. Nat. Immunol. 1:426–432. [PubMed]
57. Apostolou, I., A. Sarukhan, L. Klein, and H. von Boehmer. 2002. Origin of regulatory T cells with known specificity for antigen. Nat. Immunol. 3:756–763. [PubMed]
58. Almeida, A.R., N. Legrand, M. Papiernik, and A.A. Freitas. 2002. Homeostasis of peripheral CD4(+) T cells: IL-2Ralpha and IL-2 shape a population of regulatory cells that controls CD4(+) T cell numbers. J. Immunol. 169:4850–4860. [PubMed]
59. Malek, T.R., A. Yu, V. Vincek, P. Scibelli, and L. Kong. 2002. CD4 regulatory T cells prevent lethal autoimmunity in IL-2Rbeta-deficient mice. Implications for the nonredundant function of IL-2. Immunity. 17:167–178. [PubMed]
60. Chen, W., W. Jin, and S.M. Wahl. 1998. Engagement of cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) induces transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta) production by murine CD4(+) T cells. J. Exp. Med. 188:1849–1857. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
61. Jordan, M.S., A. Boesteanu, A.J. Reed, A.L. Petrone, A.E. Holenbeck, M.A. Lerman, A. Naji, and A.J. Caton. 2001. Thymic selection of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells induced by an agonist self-peptide. Nat. Immunol. 2:301–306. [PubMed]
62. Takahashi, T., Y. Kuniyasu, M. Toda, N. Sakaguchi, M. Itoh, M. Iwata, J. Shimizu, and S. Sakaguchi. 1998. Immunologic self-tolerance maintained by CD25+CD4+ naturally anergic and suppressive T cells: induction of autoimmune disease by breaking their anergic/suppressive state. Int. Immunol. 10:1969–1980. [PubMed]
63. Gavin, M.A., S.R. Clarke, E. Negrou, A. Gallegos, and A. Rudensky. 2002. Homeostasis and anergy of CD4+CD25+ suppressor T cells in vivo. Nat. Immunol. 3:33–41. [PubMed]
64. Iwashiro, M., R.J. Messer, K.E. Peterson, I.M. Stromnes, T. Sugie, and K.J. Hasenkrug. 2001. Immunosuppression by CD4+ regulatory T cells induced by chronic retroviral infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 98:9226–9230. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
65. Shimizu, J., S. Yamazaki, and S. Sakaguchi. 1999. Induction of tumor immunity by removing CD25+CD4+ T cells: a common basis between tumor immunity and autoimmunity. J. Immunol. 163:5211–5218. [PubMed]
66. Grossman, Z., and W.E. Paul. 2000. Self-tolerance: context dependent tuning of T cell antigen recognition. Semin. Immunol. 12:197–203. [PubMed]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

  • MedGen
    MedGen
    Related information in MedGen
  • PubMed
    PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles
  • Substance
    Substance
    PubChem Substance links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...